Martha Bayles Curriculum Vitae February 2018 331

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Martha Bayles Curriculum Vitae February 2018 331 1 MARTHA BAYLES CURRICULUM VITAE FEBRUARY 2018 331 Kenrick St. Boston College Newton, MA 02458 140 Commonwealth Ave. 857-231-6277 Chestnut Hill, MA 02467 [email protected] 617-552-3141 EDUCATION * Ed.M., Graduate School of Education, University of Pennsylvania. * B.A., Harvard University; art history, cum laude. EMPLOYMENT * Senior Lecturer in Humanities, Boston College (2003-present). * Consultant and Editor, Legatum Institute, London (2011-2012). * Lecturer, Claremont McKenna College (1997-2003). * Visiting Faculty, Colorado College (spring 2002). * Arts correspondent, Religion & Ethics News Weekly, PBS (1997-2000). * Literary Editor, Wilson Quarterly (1995-1997). * Scriptwriter and producer, New River Media (1993-1997). * Television and arts critic, Wall Street Journal (1982-1990). FELLOWSHIPS, GRANTS, AWARDS * Smith Richardson Foundation Grant, project on global media freedom (2013-present). * National Endowment for the Humanities Grant, course development grant (2015-2017). * Earhart Foundation Grant, research for Through a Screen Darkly (2010). * Smith Richardson Foundation Grant, research for Through a Screen Darkly (2006-2008). * Fulbright Senior Specialist Grant, lectureship in Poland (May 2006). * Visiting Scholar, Getty Research Institute (1998) * George C. S. Benson Fellowship, Gould Center, Claremont McKenna College (1997, 2001). * Smith Richardson Foundation Grant, research for Hole in Our Soul (1985-1987). SELECTED PUBLICATIONS Books * Through a Screen Darkly: Popular Culture, Public Diplomacy, and America’s Image Abroad (Yale University Press, 2014). * Ain't That a Shame? Censorship and the Culture of Transgression (Institute of United States Studies, University of London, 1996). * Hole in Our Soul: The Loss of Beauty and Meaning in American Popular Music (Free Press, 1994; paperback, University of Chicago Press, 1996). 2 Columns and Blogs * Monthly column on global media culture, American Interest (2016-present). * “Shadow Play,” film and television column, Claremont Review of Books (2006-present). * “Hearts and Minds,” culture and foreign affairs blog, World Affairs (2010-2011). * “Serious Popcorn,” film blog, ArtsJournal.com (2004-2011). * "Television," weekly television column, Wall Street Journal (1983-1990). * "The Talkies," monthly film column, American Spectator (1982-1984). * "Nonfiction in Brief," book review column, New York Times Book Review (1981-1983). Book Chapters * “Popular Culture,” in Understanding America, edited by Peter H. Schuck and James Q. Wilson (Public Affairs, 2008). * “Exporting the Wrong Picture,” in International Relations (Longman, 2006) [originally published in Washington Post (August 28, 2005)]. * “None So Deaf: Toward a New Pedagogy of Popular Music,” in Bridging the Gap: Popular Music and Music Education, edited by Carlos Rodriquez (National Association for Music Education, 2004). * “We Are All Sopranos,” in Annual Editions: Race and Ethnic Relations (McGraw Hill, 2004) [originally published in Chronicle of Higher Education (6 December, 2002)]. * “Miles Davis and the Double Audience,” Essays on Miles Davis, edited by Gerald Early (Missouri Historical Society, 2001). * "Popular Culture," entry in The Oxford Companion to United States History (Oxford University Press, 2001). Selected Op-Eds, Essays, and Articles * “Good for the Media, Bad for America,” American Interest (July 6, 2016). * “America's Voice Must Be Heard,” with Jeffrey Gedmin, Politico Magazine (November 16, 2015). * “How the World Perceives the New American Dream,” Atlantic (October 10, 2015). * “Putin’s Propaganda Highlights Need for Public Diplomacy,” Boston Globe (July 28, 2014). * “CIA Should Pledge Ban on Recruiting Journalists” (with Jeffrey Gedmin), Boston Globe (January 4, 2015). * “Kick the Chicken, Kowtow to the Monkey (with Jeffrey Gedmin), American Interest (December 26, 2014). * “The Decline of America’s Image Abroad,” Aus Politik und Zeitgesichte (December 8, 2014). * “Putin Propaganda Highlights Need for Public Diplomacy,” Boston Globe (July 28, 2014). * “The Struggle for Hearts and Minds: America’s Culture War and the Decline of US Public Diplomacy,” Hedgehog Review (Spring 2014). * “America’s Misguided Gender Missionaries,” American Interest (February-March 2014). * “‘The Wolf of Wall Street’: Martin Scorsese’s Cynical Global Ploy,” Boston Globe (January 27, 2014). * "Subdued by the Tube," Boston Globe (January 20, 2013). * “The Marketing of a Global Blockbuster,” Boston Globe (January 2, 2010). * “Both a Dream and a Nightmare,” Wall Street Journal (August 14, 2009). * “The Struggle for Hearts and Minds: America's Culture War and the Decline of US Public Diplomacy,” Hedgehog Review (Spring 2014) 3 * "Subdued by the Tube," Boston Globe (January 20, 2013). * “The Marketing of a Global Blockbuster,” Boston Globe (January 2, 2010). * “Paint By Numbers: New Deal art and the problems of public patronage,” Weekly Standard (November 16, 2009). * “Both a Dream and a Nightmare,” Wall Street Journal (August 14, 2009). * “When the Revolution Isn’t Broadcast,” Boston Globe (June 28, 2009) [reprinted in International Herald Tribune]. * “The Legacy of Michael Jackson,” Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty website (June 27, 2009). * “The Return of Cultural Diplomacy,” Newsweek “Special Edition: Issues 2009" (December 2008- February 2009). * “The Art of Global Public Relations,” Wall Street Journal (July 24, 2008). * “Strangers in a Foreign Land,” Wall Street Journal (August 1, 2008). * “Risky Business for Hollywood,” Boston Globe (May 6, 2008) [reprinted in International Herald Tribune]. * “Public Diplomacy, TV-Style,” Wall Street Journal (February 16, 2007). * “Innocents Abroad,” Wall Street Journal (May 5, 2006). * “Now Showing: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly Americans,” Washington Post Outlook (August 28, 2005). * “Goodwill Hunting,” Wilson Quarterly (Summer 2005). * “Some of Rap’s Fathers Start Taking Responsibility,” Wall Street Journal (July 6, 2005). * “Attacks on Rap Now Come from Within,” Wall Street Journal (April 28, 2005). * “The Strange Career of Folk Music,” Michigan Quarterly Review (Spring 2005). * “Cultural Aftershocks: Closing the Curtain on ‘Perverse Modernism’,” Chronicle of Higher Education (October 26, 2001). SELECTED RECENT LECTURES * George C. Marshall European Center for Security Studies; Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany; February 20-21, 2018. * Keynote Address, Salzburg Global Seminar organized around Through a Screen Darkly; Salzburg, Austria; September 23-28, 2016. * Presentation on US response to Russian, ISIS, and Chinese media offensives, National Endowment for Democracy Board of Directors meeting, Washington, DC; September 9, 2016. * Keynote Address, Technische Universität, Dortmund, Germany; November 6, 2015. * North American Studies and Cultural Studies, Universität Bonn, Germany; November 4, 2015. * Marian Miner Cook Athenaeum, Claremont Colleges; October 12, 2015. * James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions, Princeton University; May 18-19, 2015. * Center for the Study of Democracy, Kenyon College; April 2, 2015. * Center for the History of Liberty, University of Oklahoma; March 26-27, 2015. * Hillsdale College, conference in Naples, FL; February 18-19, 2015. * Ashbrook Center, Ashland University; October 24, 2014. * Speaking Tour of Germany sponsored by US Embassy Berlin; September 28-October 3, 2014. * Hudson Institute, Washington, DC; May 9, 2014. * American Foreign Service Association, Washington, DC; May 5, 2014. * Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University; April 8, 2014. 4 * Institute for Advanced Studies in Culture, University of Virginia; March 5, 2014. * Institute for Liberal Arts, Boston College; February 20, 2014. * Political Science Department, Boston College; January 29, 2014. * Bradley Lecture, American Enterprise Institute, Washington, DC; March 18, 2013. * James Madison Program, Princeton University; April 28-29, 2010. * International School for the Humanities in Europe, University of Warsaw, Kolegium Artes Liberales; May 29, 2009. * US Institute of International Education and Higher Colleges of Technology, Abu Dhabi; New York, NY; October 20-21, 2008. * Humanity in Action American Core Fellowship Program; New York, NY; July 15, 2008. * Public Diplomacy Council summit; George Washington University; April 25, 2008. * Panel on Understanding America, edited by Peter Schuck and James Q. Wilson; American Enterprise Institute; Washington, DC; April 22, 2008. * Young Arab Leaders Forum, sponsored by Business for Diplomatic Action and the Global Action Forum; New York, NY; March 13-15, 2008. * Chilton Club, Boston, MA; February 7, 2008. * Cosmos Club, Washington, DC; November 20, 2007. * Institute on Culture, Religion, and World Affairs, Boston University; October 31, 2007. * Council for Women at Boston College; October 18, 2007. * Conference on United States International Broadcasting, McCormick Tribune Foundation and Hudson Institute Center for Future Security Strategies, Wheaton, Illinois; April 25-27, 2007. * Film in Trade Roundtable, Washington, DC; May 7, 2007. * Vision 2047 Foundation, Hong Kong Club; April 20, 2007. * Hong Kong Forum, Foreign Correspondents’ Club; April 20, 2007. * Department of Politics and Public Administration, University of Hong Kong; April 19, 2007. * Beijing International Studies University; April 17, 2007. * Beijing Foreign Studies University, Beijing, PRC; April 16, 2007. * Shanghai Foreign Studies University; April 12, 2007. * Fudan University, Shanghai;
Recommended publications
  • Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and Voice of America: Soft Power and the Free Flow of Information
    RADIO FREE EUROPE/RADIO LIBERTY AND VOICE OF AMERICA: SOFT POWER AND THE FREE FLOW OF INFORMATION HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON EUROPE OF THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION JULY 23, 2009 Serial No. 111–24 Printed for the use of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.foreignaffairs.house.gov/ U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 51–255PDF WASHINGTON : 2009 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 0ct 09 2002 17:26 Sep 08, 2009 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 F:\WORK\EU\072309\51255.000 HFA PsN: SHIRL COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS HOWARD L. BERMAN, California, Chairman GARY L. ACKERMAN, New York ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN, Florida ENI F.H. FALEOMAVAEGA, American CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey Samoa DAN BURTON, Indiana DONALD M. PAYNE, New Jersey ELTON GALLEGLY, California BRAD SHERMAN, California DANA ROHRABACHER, California ROBERT WEXLER, Florida DONALD A. MANZULLO, Illinois ELIOT L. ENGEL, New York EDWARD R. ROYCE, California BILL DELAHUNT, Massachusetts RON PAUL, Texas GREGORY W. MEEKS, New York JEFF FLAKE, Arizona DIANE E. WATSON, California MIKE PENCE, Indiana RUSS CARNAHAN, Missouri JOE WILSON, South Carolina ALBIO SIRES, New Jersey JOHN BOOZMAN, Arkansas GERALD E. CONNOLLY, Virginia J. GRESHAM BARRETT, South Carolina MICHAEL E. MCMAHON, New York CONNIE MACK, Florida JOHN S. TANNER, Tennessee JEFF FORTENBERRY, Nebraska GENE GREEN, Texas MICHAEL T.
    [Show full text]
  • Neoconservatives Among Us? Astudy of Former Dissidents' Discourse
    43 L 62 Neoconservatives Among Us? A Study of Former Dissidents’ Discourse* JENI SCHALLER Abstract: Neoconservative political thought has been characterized as “distinctly American”, but could there be fertile ground for its basic tenets in post-communist Europe? This paper takes an initial look at the acceptance of the ideas of American neo- conservative foreign policy among Czech elites who were dissidents under the communist regime. Open-ended, semi-structured interviews with eight former dissidents were con- ducted and then analyzed against a background of some fundamental features of neocon- servative foreign policy. Discourse analysis is the primary method of examination of the texts. Although a coherent discourse among Czech former dissidents cannot be said to ex- ist, certain aspects reminiscent of American neoconservative thought were found. Key words: neoconservatism, Czech dissidents, foreign policy, discourse analysis I. INTRODUCTION Neoconservatism, as a strain of political thought in the United States, has been represented as “distinctly American” and Irving Kristol, often considered the “godfather” of neoconservatism, emphatically states “[t]here is nothing like neoconservatism in Europe” (Kristol 2003: 33). Analyst Jeffrey Gedmin writes that the “environment for neoconservatism as such is an inhospitable one” in Europe, especially Germany (Gedmin 2004: 291). The states of Cen- tral Europe, in contrast to many of the established continental EU members, represent a rather more pro-American stance. With groups of former dissi- dents whose political leanings are in part informed by the American anti- communist, pro-democracy policies of the 1970s and 1980s, could there be a more hospitable environment for neoconservative ideas in a Central Euro- pean state such as the Czech Republic? The Czech dissident community was not as extensive or well-organised as that in Poland or even Hungary, largely due to the post-1968 “normalisation” in Czechoslovakia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Boisi Center Report the Boisi Center for Religion and American Public Life at Boston College
    The Boisi Center Report the boisi center for religion and american public life at boston college vol. 10 v no. 2 v june 2010 From the Director When we began our work at the Boisi Center ten years ago, we had high hopes that the Prophetic Voices Lecture would become our signature event each year. The idea was to invite a prominent person who has demonstrated usual moral courage, and who has thought publically about his or her faith in ways that inspire action in the world. Many distinguished individuals have joined us for this purpose, including Sr. Helen Prejean, Fuller Seminary’s Richard Mouw, and Muslim scholar Abdullahi An-Na’im. This year, though, may have been the best we have hosted. Committed to intellectual diversity, I wanted a conservative thinker for the lecture and immediately thought of Professor Robert George, of Princeton University. No sooner did he accept our invitation than the New York Times Magazine ran a major profile of him. Professor George’s talk on natural law and human dignity was deeply nuanced and fascinating. Rarely have I seen so many pay attention for so long. I am enormously grateful to Robby George for joining us, and for saying such gracious things about us afterwards on the Mirror of Justice blog. This semester the Boisi Center also hosted a lecture by our benefactor and friend Geoff Boisi, who enthralled a large audience with his candid and extremely interesting talk on the Wall Street financial crisis. It was terrific to have this visit from Geoff, his wife Rene, and their son John, a student at BC.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Hollywood Isn't As Liberal As We Think and Why It Matters
    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont CMC Senior Theses CMC Student Scholarship 2019 Why Hollywood Isn't As Liberal As We Think nda Why It Matters Amanda Daily Claremont McKenna College Recommended Citation Daily, Amanda, "Why Hollywood Isn't As Liberal As We Think nda Why It Matters" (2019). CMC Senior Theses. 2230. https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/2230 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you by Scholarship@Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in this collection by an authorized administrator. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 Claremont McKenna College Why Hollywood Isn’t As Liberal As We Think And Why It Matters Submitted to Professor Jon Shields by Amanda Daily for Senior Thesis Fall 2018 and Spring 2019 April 29, 2019 2 3 Abstract Hollywood has long had a reputation as a liberal institution. Especially in 2019, it is viewed as a highly polarized sector of society sometimes hostile to those on the right side of the aisle. But just because the majority of those who work in Hollywood are liberal, that doesn’t necessarily mean our entertainment follows suit. I argue in my thesis that entertainment in Hollywood is far less partisan than people think it is and moreover, that our entertainment represents plenty of conservative themes and ideas. In doing so, I look at a combination of markets and artistic demands that restrain the politics of those in the entertainment industry and even create space for more conservative productions. Although normally art and markets are thought to be in tension with one another, in this case, they conspire to make our entertainment less one-sided politically.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of Entrepreneurship in Turkey and the Middle East
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY BERKELEY ● DAVIS ● IRVINE ● LOS ANGELES ● MERCED ● RIVERSIDE ● SAN DIEGO ● SAN FRANCISCO ● SANTA BARBARA ● SANTA CRUZ The Rise of Entrepreneurship in Turkey and the Middle East: Successes, Failures, and the Future October 12, 2013 at UC Berkeley Glimpse at the Past With the introduction of multiparty politics in 1950, Turkey’s political trajectory began to diverge form the closed, authoritarian, and repressive political systems that were fast becoming entrenched in virtually every country in the Middle East. In spite of its relatively open, democratic, and pluralistic (though flawed and military-dominated) political system, however, for most of the post- WWII period Turkey’s economic structure and patterns of development bore an uncanny resemblance to the regional norm of underperformance and unfulfilled potentials. Although largely bereft of abundant natural resources and export commodities, Turkey was nonetheless saddled with a state-dominated, inward looking, uncompetitive, corrupt, and inefficient economy that was beset with anemic growth and chronically high levels of inflation, unemployment, disparity, mismanagement, debt, and deficit. The primary foundations for economic takeoff, including the dismantling of import substituting industrialization, encouragement of private initiative, retreat from autarky, and embrace of export led growth, were laid during the premiership/presidency of Turgut Ozal in the 1980’s. Nevertheless, the 1980’s were also a time of turmoil and disruptive transition during which inflation averaged 75 percent and the ratio of government debt to GDP was consistently and excessively high. The period also witnessed the emergence of cozy and unsustainable relations between the government, bureaucracy, banks, and corporations, which paved the way for subsequent financial scandals and crises.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Europeanism and Euroscepticism in the United States
    EUI WORKING PAPERS RSCAS No. 2004/25 Anti-Europeanism and Euroscepticism in the United States Patrick Chamorel EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Transatlantic Programme Series 2004_25 Chamorel Cover.indd 1 10/11/2004 16:31:16 EUI Working Paper RSCAS No. 2004/25 Patrick Chamorel, Anti-Europeanism and Euroscepticism in the United States The Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies carries out disciplinary and interdisciplinary research in the areas of European integration and public policy in Europe. It hosts the annual European Forum. Details of this and the other research of the centre can be found on: http://www.iue.it/RSCAS/Research/. Research publications take the form of Working Papers, Policy Papers, Distinguished Lectures and books. Most of these are also available on the RSCAS website: http://www.iue.it/RSCAS/Publications/. The EUI and the RSCAS are not responsible for the opinion expressed by the author(s). EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE, FLORENCE ROBERT SCHUMAN CENTRE FOR ADVANCED STUDIES Anti-Europeanism and Euroscepticism in the United States PATRICK CHAMOREL EUI Working Paper RSCAS No. 2004/25 BADIA FIESOLANA, SAN DOMENICO DI FIESOLE (FI) All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed or utilised in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, or otherwise, without the prior permission in writing from the Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies. Download and print of the electronic edition for teaching or research non commercial use is permitted on fair use grounds—one readable copy per machine and one printed copy per page. Each copy should include the notice of copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • The Curious Relationship
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-76729-3 - Why NATO Endures Wallace J. Thies Excerpt More information 1 The Curious Relationship A curious relationship has developed within the Atlantic Alliance, also known as the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), since its inception in 1949. NATO is widely regarded as the most successful alliance ever, and statesmen on 1 both sides of the Atlantic have lavished praise upon it. They also complain incessantly about its shortcomings, most of which they blame on their counter- parts across the sea. These complaints have not gone unnoticed by observers in the press and academia, who have been quick to pronounce the Alliance ‘‘in crisis,’’ or even on the brink of collapse. Looking back over the history of the Alliance, there seems to have been scarcely a year when it was not widely said to 2 be in crisis, or at least in disarray. Is it really the case that NATO is perpetually on the brink of collapse? Claims that NATO is in crisis have been frequent in no small part because the idea of a crisis is a useful one for insiders and outsiders alike. For insiders, warning of an actual or impending crisis is the rhetorical equivalent of a shot across the bow – a way of serving notice that trouble is brewing and something should be done about it forthwith. For outsiders, a crisis in the Alliance is the rhetorical equiv- alent of an alarm bell – a way of dramatizing a problem that might otherwise be dismissed as unworthy of space on a prestigious op-ed page or in a scholarly journal.
    [Show full text]
  • MADE in HOLLYWOOD, CENSORED by BEIJING the U.S
    MADE IN HOLLYWOOD, CENSORED BY BEIJING The U.S. Film Industry and Chinese Government Influence Made in Hollywood, Censored by Beijing: The U.S. Film Industry and Chinese Government Influence 1 MADE IN HOLLYWOOD, CENSORED BY BEIJING The U.S. Film Industry and Chinese Government Influence TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION 1 REPORT METHODOLOGY 5 PART I: HOW (AND WHY) BEIJING IS 6 ABLE TO INFLUENCE HOLLYWOOD PART II: THE WAY THIS INFLUENCE PLAYS OUT 20 PART III: ENTERING THE CHINESE MARKET 33 PART IV: LOOKING TOWARD SOLUTIONS 43 RECOMMENDATIONS 47 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 53 ENDNOTES 54 Made in Hollywood, Censored by Beijing: The U.S. Film Industry and Chinese Government Influence MADE IN HOLLYWOOD, CENSORED BY BEIJING EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ade in Hollywood, Censored by Beijing system is inconsistent with international norms of Mdescribes the ways in which the Chinese artistic freedom. government and its ruling Chinese Communist There are countless stories to be told about China, Party successfully influence Hollywood films, and those that are non-controversial from Beijing’s warns how this type of influence has increasingly perspective are no less valid. But there are also become normalized in Hollywood, and explains stories to be told about the ongoing crimes against the implications of this influence on freedom of humanity in Xinjiang, the ongoing struggle of Tibetans expression and on the types of stories that global to maintain their language and culture in the face of audiences are exposed to on the big screen. both societal changes and government policy, the Hollywood is one of the world’s most significant prodemocracy movement in Hong Kong, and honest, storytelling centers, a cinematic powerhouse whose everyday stories about how government policies movies are watched by millions across the globe.
    [Show full text]
  • Nato Enlargement: Qualifications and Contributions—Parts I–Iv Hearings
    S. HRG. 108–180 NATO ENLARGEMENT: QUALIFICATIONS AND CONTRIBUTIONS—PARTS I–IV HEARINGS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED EIGHTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION MARCH 27, AND APRIL 1, 3 AND 8, 2003 Printed for the use of the Committee on Foreign Relations ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/senate U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 90–325 PDF WASHINGTON : 2003 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 11-MAY-2000 17:42 Nov 12, 2003 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 90325 SFORELA1 PsN: SFORELA1 COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS RICHARD G. LUGAR, Indiana, Chairman CHUCK HAGEL, Nebraska JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., Delaware LINCOLN CHAFEE, Rhode Island PAUL S. SARBANES, Maryland GEORGE ALLEN, Virginia CHRISTOPHER J. DODD, Connecticut SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas JOHN F. KERRY, Massachusetts MICHAEL B. ENZI, Wyoming RUSSELL D. FEINGOLD, Wisconsin GEORGE V. VOINOVICH, Ohio BARBARA BOXER, California LAMAR ALEXANDER, Tennessee BILL NELSON, Florida NORM COLEMAN, Minnesota JOHN D. ROCKEFELLER IV, West Virginia JOHN E. SUNUNU, New Hampshire JON S. CORZINE, New Jersey KENNETH A. MYERS, JR., Staff Director ANTONY J. BLINKEN, Democratic Staff Director (II) VerDate 11-MAY-2000 17:42 Nov 12, 2003 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 90325 SFORELA1 PsN: SFORELA1 CONTENTS Thursday, March 27, 2003—Part I Page Allen, Hon. George, U.S. Senator from Virginia, opening statement .................
    [Show full text]
  • Pfizerlectures03.Pdf
    On Corporate Governance The Corporation As It Ought to Be Michael Novak The AEI Press Publisher forthe American Enterprise Institute WASHINGTON, D.C. 1997 Available in the United States from the AEI Press, cf o Pub­ lisher Resources Inc., 1224 Heil Quaker Blvd., P.0. Box 7001, La Vergne, TN 37086-7001. Distributed outside the United States by arrangement with Eurospan, 3 Henrietta Street, London WC2E BLU England. ISBN 0-8447-7082-5 1357910 8 6 4 2 ©1997 by the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Washington, D.C. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without permission in writing from the American Enterprise Institute except in the case of brief quotations embodied in news articles, critical articles, or reviews. The views expressed in thepublications of the American Enterprise Institute are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect theviews of thestaff, advisory panels, officers,or trusteesof AEI. The AEI Press Publisher for the American Enterprise Institute 1150 17th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036 Printed in the United States ofAmerica To the memory ofMichael A. Scully (1949-1996) who served his faith, his family, his country, and his business vocation well, and who was loved by his friendsas few men are. Contents PREFACE vii WHAT Is THE BUSINESS CORPORATION? 3 EXECUTNE ENERGY 5 THE ANT AND THE ELEPHANT 10 WHY Do FIRMS ExisT? 12 PIRATES! 13 MUTUAL FUNDS AND PENSION FUNDS 15 LOOKING FOR THE RIGHT STUFF 16 A WELL-LIGHTED PLACE 18 ON ENVY: "THOU SHALT NOT COVET" 19 Two TYPES OF INEQUALITY 22 JUSTIFYING UNEQUAL COMPENSATION 24 AGAINST APPEASEMENT 27 A CHEERFUL VIEW AT THE END OF A SORRY CENTURY 30 NOTES 33 ABOUT THE AUTHOR 45 v Preface n the summer of 1995, representatives of Pfizer Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Support a Strong Transatlantic Dialogue 2. Defend Pluralistic Democracy As a Core Value of Western Democracies 3
    Although terrorism and the migrant crisis have, until The Steering Committee recently, attracted most of the headlines, in Europe Jeffrey Gedmin, Senior Fellow, Georgetown University; today one of the most serious threats to the democratic Sandra Kalniete, Member of the European Parliament, former order comes from Vladimir Putin’s Kremlin. Across the Foreign Minister of Latvia; continent, Russia is in the process of expanding its Petr Kolář, Chairman, European Values Initiative; former Czech military and political options by polarizing attitudes Ambassador to U.S. and Russia; David J. Kramer, Senior Director for Human Rights and Human among the public in target states. It spreads false Freedoms, McCain Institute; former President, Freedom House; information regarding United States and European Günter Krings, Parliamentary State Secretary, Federal Ministry Union (EU) policies and intentions in order to decrease of the Interior (Germany); trust in democratic institutions and public support for Mike Rogers, Distinguished Fellow, Hudson Institute; former closer ties with the Euro-Atlantic community in states Member of Congress; former Chairman, House Intelligence both inside and outside of the EU. This campaign of Committee; Gary Schmitt, Resident Scholar, Co-Director of the Marilyn soft-power intervention created the need for a Ware Center for Security Studies and Director of the Program coordinated response carried out by both, the on American Citizenship, American Enterprise Institute; and European governments and civil society with an aim to Lucinda Creighton, Former Irish Minister of State for European improve communication, strengthen advocacy, and Affairs; increase outreach within the transatlantic community. Martin Bútora, Member, Slovak Atlantic Commission, former Slovak Ambassador to the US.
    [Show full text]
  • NORMAN L. EISEN the Brookings Institution 1775 Massachusetts Ave NW Washington, DC 20036 (202) 238-3178 [email protected] [email protected]
    1 AMBASSADOR (RET.) NORMAN L. EISEN The Brookings Institution 1775 Massachusetts Ave NW Washington, DC 20036 (202) 238-3178 [email protected] [email protected] CURRICULUM VITAE PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE The Brookings Institution Senior Fellow, Governance Studies 1775 Massachusetts Ave NW, Washington, DC 20036 September 2014–Present (Visiting Fellow through 12/2016; Fellow through 6/2017) Author of A Case for the American People: The United States v. Donald J. Trump (Crown 2020); The Last Palace: Europe’s Turbulent Century in Five Lives and One Legendary House (Crown 2018); Democracy’s Defenders: U.S. Embassy Prague, the Fall of Communism in Czechoslovakia, and its Aftermath (Brookings Institution Press 2020); and numerous reports and other writings. Project chair and principal investigator of “Leveraging Transparency to Reduce Corruption,” a five-year global study examining transparency, accountability, and participation (TAP) mechanisms, along with their contextual factors, in the extractives industry. Convene and lead dialogues at Brookings with diplomatic, government, business, and nonprofit leaders from the United States and Europe. Speak before government bodies and other audiences on governance issues domestically and internationally, including regarding legislation, regulation, and policy formation. Regularly author op-eds in such outlets as the New York Times and the Washington Post and appear on television and radio to present transatlantic relations and governance issues to the general public. Committee on the Judiciary of the U.S. House of Representatives Special Counsel 2138 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515 February 2019–February 2020 Counsel for oversight and policy issues within the Committee’s jurisdiction, including the investigation, impeachment and trial of President Donald Trump.
    [Show full text]