DOCSLIB.ORG

An Impediment to Integration of Turkish Youths Into Society a Modest Proposal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Impediment to Integration of Turkish Youths Into Society a Modest Proposal THE GERMAN EDUCATION SYSTEM: AN IMPEDIMENT TO INTEGRATION OF TURKISH YOUTHS INTO SOCIETY A MODEST PROPOSAL A thesis submitted to the Kent State University Honors College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for University Honors by Jennifer Marie Maas May, 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEGDGMENTS .............................................................................................. vi PREFACE ......................................................................................................................... vii CHAPTER I. GERMAN SOCIETY IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY .............................. 1 The Population of Twenty-first Century Germany ................................................. 1 The Population of 1961 Germany in a Journey back to Divided Times .............. 10 The 1961 Population of the Federal Republic of Germany .................................. 11 The 1961 Population of the German Democratic Republic .................................. 14 A Changed Nation: the Fifty Years That Led to a Multicultural Society ............. 16 II. MINORITIES IN TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY GERMANY ........................... 20 A Changing and Diverse Society .......................................................................... 20 The National Minorities Residing in Twenty-first Century Germany .................. 20 Velkommen, or Did You Mean Wilkommen ............................................ 21 Esmeralda Danced her Way to Germany .................................................. 23 The Sorbs, a Minority That Prides Itself on Tradition .............................. 25 The Ethnic Minorities Residing in Twenty-first Century Germany ..................... 26 The Crescent Moon has Risen ................................................................... 27 The Maestro Has Arrived Bearing Gifts - Pizza Fungi, per favore! ......... 28 Polonaise or Polka ..................................................................................... 30 Seeking Asylum .................................................................................................... 32 III. TURKS RESIDING IN TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY GERMANY .................. 35 Hoşgeldiniz,Welcome! .......................................................................................... 35 Can One Define a Turk?........................................................................................ 35 Turkish Population over Time............................................................................... 37 The Urban Minority .............................................................................................. 39 The Turkish Population in Germany: A Reflection on the Past ............................ 40 Turks’ Role in Society: From Necessary Workers to a Nuisance and Unwelcome Guest .......................................................................................... 41 An Economic Disadvantage .................................................................................. 41 A Religious Debate ............................................................................................... 43 Merhaba ≠ Guten Tag ........................................................................................... 46 iii The Cultural Impact of the Turks on German Society .......................................... 47 A Unique and Unfitting Piece of the Puzzle ......................................................... 49 IV. THE DIVIDE BETWEEN ETHNIC GERMANS AND TURKS IN TWENTY- FIRST CENTURY GERMANY ........................................................................... 51 A Square Peg in a Round Hole.............................................................................. 51 Turk = Foreigner ................................................................................................... 52 A Negative Disposition ......................................................................................... 53 A Frightened Population ....................................................................................... 57 The Ignorant Majority ........................................................................................... 58 V. INTEGRATION IN TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY GERMANY ....................... 60 A Call for Assimilation ......................................................................................... 60 Integrate: To Bring Together or Incorporate Parts into a Whole, or: Ethnic Germans + Turks = Heterogeneous Society .............................................. 60 Integration, a Fundamental Responsibility and Necessity .................................... 63 The Integrator vs. the Integratee ........................................................................... 63 The Importance of Language and Education ........................................................ 64 The Extreme Push towards Integration ................................................................. 65 Attempts at Integration .......................................................................................... 66 Has Integration Failed, and Was it even a Possibility? ........................................ 66 VI. YOUTHS IN TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY GERMANY .................................. 69 Germany’s Diverse Youth Population .................................................................. 69 Part I: The Ethnic German Youths ........................................................................ 72 Part II: The Turkish Youths .................................................................................. 73 An Identity Crisis .................................................................................................. 74 Living Like a Turk ................................................................................................ 74 The Great Divide ................................................................................................... 76 VII. THE CONTEMPORARY GERMAN SCHOOL SYSTEM ................................. 79 Intellectual Forefathers .......................................................................................... 79 Part I: The Institutions of the Contemporary German School System .................. 80 Kindergarten ............................................................................................. 81 Grundschule .............................................................................................. 82 Gymnasium ................................................................................................ 83 Realschule ................................................................................................. 84 Hauptschule ............................................................................................... 86 Germany’s School System is Embracing Change ................................................. 87 Part II: Placement in German Schools .................................................................. 88 A Complex Formula: A + B + C = Success .......................................................... 88 The Teacher, the Ruler of Children’s Futures ....................................................... 89 Placement: A Controversial Procedure ................................................................. 90 A Lack of Control ................................................................................................. 91 Corrupting Dreams ................................................................................................ 92 Does the Process of Placement need to be Challenged? ...................................... 94 iv VIII. INTEGRATION HAS FAILED: GERMANY’S EDUCATION SYSTEM IS TO BLAME ................................................................................................................. 96 Part I: Integration Has Failed ................................................................................ 96 An Unwelcome Population and its Unfriendly Host ............................................. 96 The Economic Divide............................................................................................ 98 Part II: Germany’s Contemporary Education System Prevents Turkish Youths from Successfully Integrating into German Society ........................................... 100 Placement: Separating the Foreigners from the Natives ..................................... 100 The Turks’ Lack of Education ............................................................................ 103 Hidden Identity .................................................................................................... 105 Change is the Only Solution ............................................................................... 105 IX. FORM MUST FOLLOW FUNCTION: REFORMS TO THE GERMAN EDUCATION SYSTEM THAT WILL ENABLE THE TURKS’ TO SUCCEED .................................................................................................... 107 Change is a Requirement..................................................................................... 107 Hauptschule , the Pink Slip for a Student ............................................................ 109 Solution I: Placing a Makeover on Line One ...................................................... 111 Solution II: Abolish Hauptschulen and Replace Them with Integrated Secondary Schools ...................................... 115 X. MERHABA! LESS CONFUSION, MORE UNDERSTANDING: INTROCDUCING TURKISH AS A FOREIGN LANGUAGE IN GERMAN SCHOOLS TO PROMOTE INTEGRATION AMONG TURKISH AND GERMAN YOUTHS .........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Germany-Thuringia "Stiftung Deutsche Landerziehungsheime Hermann
    OECD - Innovative Learning Environment Project Universe Case Germany-Thuringia "Stiftung Deutsche Landerziehungsheime Hermann-Lietz Schule Haubinda" A private full-day boarding school based on reform pedagogic principles by H. Lietz (in tradition of Landerziehungsheime), comprising primary school, secondary school, and technical college for students aged 6 – 20. The school follows official curricula, but in addition emphasizes practical, manual work and cooperative, social skills. Whereas the focus of primary school is on the acquisition of learning methods like individual project work and cooperative learning in mixed-age groups, the higher grades are more subject- oriented. Work forms include participation in scientific competitions, cooperation with local communities, and theatre performances. Communication among teachers is organized (e.g., in teacher groups) in order to encourage interdisciplinary cooperation and unified curricula. A school parliament including students decides on daily school life, and a school board including parents oversees school functioning. Main Focus of Innovation: ORGANISATION, TEACHERS Other keywords: alternative philosophy General Information Name of the ILE: Stiftung Deutsche Landerziehungsheime Hermann-Lietz Schule Haubinda Location/Address: Stiftung 01, 98663 Haubinda, Thuringia, Germany Website: www.lietz-schulen.de ILE submitted by: Thuringian Ministry of Culture and Education 1 OECD - Innovative Learning Environment Project Universe Case Rationale Why do you suggest that it should be included in
    [Show full text]
  • Reconstruction of the Ja'fari Identity in Turkey
    European Scientific Journal February 2015 edition vol.11, No.5 ISSN: 1857 – 7881 (Print) e - ISSN 1857- 7431 FROM MAIN COMPONENT TO EQUAL CITIZEN: RECONSTRUCTION OF THE JA’FARI IDENTITY IN TURKEY Baris Erdogan, PhD Assistant Professor of Sociology, Istanbul Gelisim University/Turkey Abstract The ethnic, sectarian, and political conflicts in Iraq and Syria serve as significant catalysts for Turkey’s Ja’faris to redefine their social identity. This article comprises a sociological analysis of the Ja’fari community who are predominantly Azeri Turks adhering to the Shiite sect. The article addresses the parameters they pursue in order to construct and position their own social identity in light of the developments in foreign and domestic politics in Turkey where the Sunni population constitutes the quantitative and political majority. Since the foundation of the secular Republic up until today, the establishment has pursued the policy of homogenizing citizens via its ideological apparatus based on Sunni Islam references. As a response, Ja’faris have been rebuilding their identity in tandem with the social changes. In order to integrate with the national policies and overcome the barriers that arise from sectarian differences, Ja’faris constantly underscore in the public sphere that they are the founding components of the nation as “Turks” and “Muslim”s. However, Turkey’s foreign and domestic politics during the conflicts in Iraq, and particularly in the post-Syrian crisis has engendered, citing the Ja’fari leader’s own words, a “shocking effect” within the Ja’fari community. Given the new state of affairs, Ja’faris are rebuilding the Ja’fari identity using a dual language: On one hand, they continue to highlight the “superior” Turkish and Muslim identity that is embraced by the unofficial state ideology, and on the other hand, they embark on a quest for a more civilian equal citizenship within social movements.
    [Show full text]
  • Germanic Origins from the Perspective of the Y-Chromosome
    Germanic Origins from the Perspective of the Y-Chromosome By Michael Robert St. Clair A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor in Philosophy in German in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Irmengard Rauch, Chair Thomas F. Shannon Montgomery Slatkin Spring 2012 Abstract Germanic Origins from the Perspective of the Y-Chromosome by Michael Robert St. Clair Doctor of Philosophy in German University of California, Berkeley Irmengard Rauch, Chair This dissertation holds that genetic data are a useful tool for evaluating contemporary models of Germanic origins. The Germanic languages are a branch of the Indo-European language family and include among their major contemporary representatives English, German, Dutch, Danish, Swedish, Norwegian and Icelandic. Historically, the search for Germanic origins has sought to determine where the Germanic languages evolved, and why the Germanic languages are similar to and different from other European languages. Both archaeological and linguist approaches have been employed in this research direction. The linguistic approach to Germanic origins is split among those who favor the Stammbaum theory and those favoring language contact theory. Stammbaum theory posits that Proto-Germanic separated from an ancestral Indo-European parent language. This theoretical approach accounts for similarities between Germanic and other Indo- European languages by posting a period of mutual development. Germanic innovations, on the other hand, occurred in isolation after separation from the parent language. Language contact theory posits that Proto-Germanic was the product of language convergence and this convergence explains features that Germanic shares with other Indo-European languages.
    [Show full text]
  • Erfurt - Weimar - Jena West - Jena-Göschwitz - Gera HOLZLANDBAHN ൹ 565
    Kursbuch der Deutschen Bahn 2020 www.bahn.de/kursbuch 565 Erfurt - Weimar - Jena West - Jena-Göschwitz - Gera HOLZLANDBAHN ൹ 565 VMT-Tarif Erfurt Hbf - Gera (IC, RE, EB); Anerkennung von Nahverkehrsfahrscheinen in den IC zwischen Erfurt und Gera RE 1 Göttingen - Erfurt - Gera - Glauchau ᵕᵖ; RE 3 Erfurt - Gera - Altenburg ᵕᵖ EB 21 Erfurt - Weimar - Jena-Göschwitz - Gera ᵕᵖ Zug EB 21 EB 21 EB 21 EB 21 RE 3 RE 3 RB 20 EB 21 ICE EB 21 RE 1 RE 1 EB 21 RE 3 RE 3 RE 3 80915 80796 80919 80875 3949 3901 74605 80877 698 80917 3653 3653 80879 3953 3903 3923 f hy Sa,So Mo-Fr Mo-Fr Mo-Fr Mo-Fr Sa Mo-Fr Mo-Fr Ẅ ẅ Ẇ ẇ Ẇ Ẇ Ẇ Ẇ km von Eisenach München Greiz Heilbad Hbf Heiligensta 51 6 ܥ 51 6 20 6 ܥ ẘẖ 5 44 ẘẖ 6 06 22 5 58 4 ܥ ẗẒ 4 37 ẗẔ 4 37 08 3 ܥ Erfurt Hbf ẞẖ ݝ 0 38 0 7 Vieselbach Ꭺ 0 43 ܥ 3 15 ܥᎪܥᎪܥ 5 03 Ꭺ ܥᎪ ܥᎪܥᎪ ᎪܥᎪ 14 Hopfgarten (Weimar) Ꭺ 0 48 ܥ 3 19 ܥᎪܥᎪܥ 5 08 Ꭺ ܥᎪ ܥᎪܥᎪ ᎪܥᎪ 21 Weimar ẞẖ ܙ 0 54 ܥ 3 25 ܥ 4 49 ܥ 4 49 ܥ 5 13 5 35 ܥ 5 55 ẘẖ 6 21 ܥ 6 32 7 04 ܥ 7 04 Weimar 0 55 ܥ 2 05 ܥ 3 25 ܥ 4 22 ܥ 4 51 ܥ 4 51 ܥ 5 17 ܥ 5 41 ܥ 5 57 ẗẔ 6 22 ܥ 6 34 7 06 ܥ 7 06 25 Oberweimar 0 59 ܥᎪܥᎪܥ4 26 ܥᎪܥᎪ ܥ5 21 ܥ 5 45 ܥᎪ ܥ6 26 ܥᎪ ᎪܥᎪ 29 Mellingen (Thür) 1 02 ܥᎪܥ3 31 ܥ 4 29 ܥᎪܥᎪ ܥ5 24 ܥ 5 48 ܥᎪ ܥ6 29 ܥᎪ ᎪܥᎪ 36 Großschwabhausen 1 07 ܥᎪܥ3 36 ܥ 4 34 ܥᎪܥᎪ ܥ5 29 ܥ 5 53 ܥᎪ ܥ6 34 ܥᎪ ᎪܥᎪ 44 Jena West ܙ 1 13 ܥᎪܥ3 42 ܥ 4 40 ܥ 5 04 ܥ 5 04 ܥ 5 35 ܥ 5 59 ܥ 6 10 ܥ 6 40 ܥ 6 48 7 20 ܥ 7 20 Jena West 1 14 ܥᎪܥ3 43 ܥ 4 41 ܥ 5 05 ܥ 5 05 ܥ 5 37 ܥ 6 00 ܥ 6 12 ܥ 6 41 ܥ 6 50 7 22 ܥ 7 22 26 7 ܥ 26 7 54 6 ܥ 46 6 ܥ 16 6 ܥ 05 6 ܥ 41 5 ܥ 09 5 ܥ 09 5 ܥ 46 4 ܥ 48 3 ܥ 51 2 ܥ 19 1 ܙ Jena-Göschwitz
    [Show full text]
  • An Etymological and Lexicological Note on the Words for Some Ancient Eurasian Grain Legume Crops in Turkic Languages
    Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 2011, 16(2): 179-182 AN ETYMOLOGICAL AND LEXICOLOGICAL NOTE ON THE WORDS FOR SOME ANCIENT EURASIAN GRAIN LEGUME CROPS IN TURKIC LANGUAGES Aleksandar MIKIĆ1* Vesna PERIĆ2 1Institute of Field and Vegetable Crops, Serbia 2Maize Research Institute Zemun Polje, Serbia *Corresponding author’s email: [email protected] Received: 06.07.2011 ABSTRACT On their way to both Europe and Caucasus, during the 7th and 6th millennia BC, the most ancient Old World grain legume crops, such as pea (Pisum sativum L.), lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) and faba bean (Vicia faba L.), passed through the region of modern Turkey but also spread towards the original Altaic, and then, Turkic homeland. The assumption that at least some of these crops were known to the ancestors of the modern Turkic nations is confirmed by attesting the Proto-Altaic *bŭkrV, denoting pea and its descendant the Proto-Turkic *burčak, being responsible for all the words denoting pea in the majority of the modern Turkic languages and the borrowed Hungarian borsó. The Proto-Altaic root *zịăbsa, denoting lentil, gave the Proto-Turkic, *jasi-muk, with the same meaning and with numerous, morphologically well-preserved descendants in modern Turkic languages. Key words: Etymology, grain legumes, lexicology, Turkic languages. INTRODUCTION uncertain origin (Georg et al. 1999) and still disputed by some as being true Altaic languages. Majority of the traditional Eurasian grain legume crops, such as pea (Pisum sativum L.) and lentil (Lens culinaris The supporters of the existence of the Altaic language Medik.) originated in the Near Eastern centre of diversity, family assumed that its five branches had a common ancestor while faba bean (Vicia faba L.) originated in the central referred to as Proto-Altaic, although the written records on its Asian centre of diversity (Zeven and Zhukovsky 1975).
    [Show full text]
  • Coordinating Immigrant Integration in Germany Mainstreaming at the Federal and Local Levels
    coordinating immigrant integration in germany mainstreaming at the federal and local levels By Petra Bendel MIGRATION POLICY INSTITUTE EUROPE Coordinating immigrant integration in Germany Mainstreaming at the federal and local levels By Petra Bendel August 2014 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author is particularly grateful for the assistance of Sabine Klotz and Christine Scharf in research and useful critiques. She would also like to thank all her interview partners in the different ministeries and agencies at the federal and state levels as well as local administrations for their frankness and for providing useful material on ‘best practices’. This report, part of a research project supported by the Kingdom of the Netherlands, is one of four country reports on mainstreaming: Denmark, France, Germany, and the United Kingdom. MPI Europe thanks key partners in this research project, Peter Scholten from Erasmus University and Ben Gidley from Compas, Oxford University. © 2014 Migration Policy Institute Europe. All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission from MPI Europe. A full-text PDF of this document is available for free download from www.mpieurope.org. Information for reproducing excerpts from this report can be found at www.migrationpolicy.org/about/copyright-policy. Inquiries can also be directed to [email protected]. Suggested citation: Bendel, Petra. 2014. Coordinating immigrant integration in Germany: Mainstreaming at the federal and local levels. Brussels: Migration Policy Institute Europe. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................1 I. INTRODUCTION: THE CONTEXT OF IMMIGRATION AND INTEGRATION IN GERMANY ...........................................2 II.
    [Show full text]
  • Thuringia Focus
    August 2021 Thuringia Focus. Intercord dedicates new R&D center Mühlhausen has long been a produc- tion hub for technical yarns, espe- cially for the automotive industry. Its footprint is now set to grow: A new development center was officially com- missioned on Intercord’s Mühlhausen premises in mid-June. The company en- larged the research department, too. Intercord will conduct tests at the new development center, while customers and suppliers will have an opportuni- ty to perform material testing of their At the laying of the foundation stone for the new building of Carlisle in Waltershausen. Photo: Carlisle own. Intercord’s Managing Director Ra- mazan Yasbay believes the center will provide a comprehensive overview of On the growth track: US investor Carlisle the products and materials that custo- mers want. The CEO described the sale expands operations in Thuringia of the company last October to US- based Beaver Manufacturing Company (BMC) as a “lucky thing” and called the Plastics specialist Carlisle is growing 25 new jobs and increase the Thuringian family-owned company a good choice. and investing around EUR 50 million in site’s total internal area to 17,000 square Electric mobility, too, is an important a new production facility in Waltershau- meters. The company will also buy new issue for Intercord. New engines will sen, Thuringia. The expansion is proof equipment for producing its special wa- mean new requirements for technical positive that Thuringia’s excellent site terproofing membranes. These products fibers. The company and its 90 em- conditions and all-round service make a are a runaway success since they can be ployees appear well prepared.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkish Language As a Politicized Element: the Case of Turkish Nation-Building
    GeT MA Working Paper Series No. 15 2018 Turkish Language as a Politicized Element: The Case of Turkish Nation-Building TOLGA SEVIN GeT MA Working Paper Series Department of Social Sciences Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Unter den Linden 6, 10099 Berlin www.sowi.hu-berlin.de/getma [email protected] TOLGA SEVIN GET MA WP 15/2018 GeT MA Working Paper Series Published by the German Turkish Masters Program of Social Sciences (GeT MA), Department of Social Sciences at Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. Papers in this series are the final theses of GeT MA graduates. Publication in this series does not preclude a later publication elsewhere. The views expressed in the GeT MA Working Paper Series are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the GeT MA Program or of Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. The copyright stays with the author(s). Copyright for this paper: Tolga Sevin Please cite in the following format: Sevin, Tolga (2018): Turkish Language as a Politicized Element: The Case of Turkish Nation-Building. GeT MA Working Paper No. 15, Department of Social Sciences, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. [online] Homepage: Edoc Server Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. URL: http://edoc.hu-berlin.de/series/getmaseries Corresponding authors: Tolga Sevin, Master of Social Science, German Turkish Masters Program, Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, 10099 Berlin. Tolga Sevin, born in Ankara, studied at Bilkent University, Middle East Technical University, and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin. He lives in Berlin. This thesis is dedicated to Müfit Kulen.
    [Show full text]
  • Standing up for Equality in Germany’S Schools Standing up for Equality in Germany’S Schools 1
    STANDING UP FOR EQUALITY IN GERMANy’S SCHOOLS STANDING UP FOR EQUALITY IN GERMANy’S SCHOOLS 1 INTRODUCTION No country wants to believe that it is It is clear that children from a “migration failing its children in any way. It is difficult background”1 perform significantly to imagine a government that would not worse at school than their native German support the idea of equal education for counterparts. The term “migration back- all. Germany is no exception. And yet, ground” covers children from families in Germany, children of varied ethnic who are still perceived as “foreigners” and racial backgrounds have vastly because of their racial or ethnic identity, different educational opportunities and even though their families may have experiences. arrived in Germany years ago. This should no longer be a surprise. In 2001, an influential European study shocked Germans with the news that their country, which long had prided itself on its excellent educational system, was at the low end of the compara- tive spectrum. The study, undertaken in 2000 by the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) (an arm of the Organization for Economic Development and Cooperation (OECD)), showed that German children did poorly in reading, math, and science, in comparison to students from 56 other countries. The PISA study described the deep flaws in the German education system. In particular, it explained that at-risk students—including those of migration, or migrant, backgrounds—performed among the worst in the world. They were more often tracked into the lowest level Hauptschule; they were excluded from the best classrooms; and they had far fewer opportunities to attend Gymnasium, which meant they were not permitted to take the state Abitur examination and attend university.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom of Religion in Turkey – the Alevi Issue
    www.epc.eu 24 January 2014 01/12/2009 Freedom of religion in Turkey – The Alevi issue Amanda Paul and Demir Murat Seyrek Freedom of religion is a fundamental right that must be protected and respected by states. While Turkey has taken important steps in advancing religious freedoms over the last decade, a number of challenges remain. Turkey’s Alevi Community continues to face serious problems in terms of being officially recognised by the state and in practicing their religion. While Turkey is officially a secular country, Sunni Islam is the unofficial state religion. Despite Ankara being a signatory of several international conventions and treaties that guarantee fundamental freedoms for all, key fundamental rights of Alevis remain ignored by the state. Last September, hopes were raised that a new “democratisation package” would include steps to further their freedoms but it failed to do so, with the government announcing that a ‘special’ Alevi reform package would be unveiled by the end of 2013. This did not happen. Who are the Alevis? After Sunnis, Alevis constitute the second largest religious community in Turkey. While Alevism is frequently categorised under the Shia denomination of Islam, it is significantly different. While, as with Shia Muslims, Alevis consider the Prophet Mohammed’s descendants (12 Imams) as holy, they also see them as philosophic leaders. Philosophy, human development and humanist ideals are important cornerstones of the Alevi belief. Alevi, which means “follower of Ali”, attribute great significance to Sufism and the 12 Imams, with a unique importance given to Ali, the son-in-law of the Prophet Mohammed.
    [Show full text]
  • Conceptions of Terror(Ism) and the “Other” During The
    CONCEPTIONS OF TERROR(ISM) AND THE “OTHER” DURING THE EARLY YEARS OF THE RED ARMY FACTION by ALICE KATHERINE GATES B.A. University of Montana, 2007 B.S. University of Montana, 2007 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Colorado in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Germanic and Slavic Languages and Literatures 2012 This thesis entitled: Conceptions of Terror(ism) and the “Other” During the Early Years of the Red Army Faction written by Alice Katherine Gates has been approved for the Department of Germanic and Slavic Languages and Literatures _____________________________________ Dr. Helmut Müller-Sievers _____________________________________ Dr. Patrick Greaney _____________________________________ Dr. Beverly Weber Date__________________ The final copy of this thesis has been examined by the signatories, and we Find that both the content and the form meet acceptable presentation standards Of scholarly work in the above mentioned discipline. iii Gates, Alice Katherine (M.A., Germanic and Slavic Languages and Literatures) Conceptions of Terror(ism) and the “Other” During the Early Years of the Red Army Faction Thesis directed by Professor Helmut Müller-Sievers Although terrorism has existed for centuries, it continues to be extremely difficult to establish a comprehensive, cohesive definition – it is a monumental task that scholars, governments, and international organizations have yet to achieve. Integral to this concept is the variable and highly subjective distinction made by various parties between “good” and “evil,” “right” and “wrong,” “us” and “them.” This thesis examines these concepts as they relate to the actions and manifestos of the Red Army Faction (die Rote Armee Fraktion) in 1970s Germany, and seeks to understand how its members became regarded as terrorists.
    [Show full text]
  • Henryk Chałupczak POLAND's STRATEGY to NEUTRALIZE THE
    16 HENRYK CHAŁUPCZAK ESSAYS „Studies in Politics and Society” 9/2012 Henryk Chałupczak POLAND’S STRATEGY TO NEUTRALIZE THE GERMAN MINORITY’S PETITIONS AT THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS IN THE INTERWAR PERIOD 1. The Procedure The interwar system for protection of national minorities in Europe was based on commitments undertaken by several states that had fol- lowed from the so called small Treaty of Versailles, resolutions of the Council of the League of Nations that specified the conditions of its execution, and, as far as some states are concerned, conventions signed by those states. The principles to file petitions by the minorities in the states covered by the small Treaty of Versailles were laid down in the so called general procedure and an extraordinary procedure that – even though not included in the Treaty – followed from the Treaty’s inter- pretation. The first of those envisaged a few ways for the minorities to assert their rights, including putting in complaints – some types of the complaints required collaboration with a member of the League’s Council. Art. 12 of the Treaty was particularly important in this respect, according to which should a controversy arise over its interpretation, the controversial issue might be resolved by means of arbitrage (Kutrzeba 1925: 79–82). Regarding the extraordinary procedure, the resolution of the League’s Council of 22 October 1920 had been of fundamental im- portance, since it had granted actors who were not members of the Council – including the minorities – the right to inform the Council by means of petitions about infringements or threats to infringe upon the Treaty regulations.
    [Show full text]