DOCSLIB.ORG

Winged Launcher

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Winged Launcher 2015 Winged Launcher TAKEHIRO OKURA Contents 1. Overview ............................................................................................................................................................... 2 2. Spaceplane ............................................................................................................................................................. 2 2.1. Spaceplane .................................................................................................................................................... 2 2.2. Technical aspect ............................................................................................................................................ 3 2.3. Problems ....................................................................................................................................................... 3 3. Winged Launcher .................................................................................................................................................. 4 3.1. Merits and Demerits of Winged Launcher .................................................................................................... 4 3.2. Prospective winged launcher ........................................................................................................................ 4 4. Dream Chaser Orbital Spacecraft .......................................................................................................................... 5 5. Pegasus .................................................................................................................................................................. 6 6. Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................................. 8 7. References ............................................................................................................................................................. 8 1. Overview The space shuttle is a manned spacecraft that has re-use concept. The United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has been launched 135 times from 1981 to 2011. (Figure 1) Since the space shuttle had had the unexpected high cost and risk, the idea that winged spacecraft is inefficient and that the capsule spacecraft is the most efficient is widespread. However, just because the space shuttle had failed does not lead to an absolute negation of the winged spacecraft. This paper researched the possibilities of winged spacecraft. Figure 1. Space Shuttle 2. Spaceplane 2.1. Spaceplane Spaceplane is the next generation of space shuttle and equipped with wings and a rocket engine. (Figure 2) Like an aircraft, the spaceplane can horizontally takeoff and land without a special launch system; therefore this is expected to be ultra-high-speed transport aircraft type of spacecraft that can be used for cargo transportation between the space station and the ground. In the atmosphere, the spaceplane operates as an aircraft; on the other hand, in the space, it operates as a spacecraft. In addition, since the design of spaceplane is based on an aircraft, the spaceplane is expected to be a reusable spacecraft, leading to decreasing the operation cost. Figure 2. History of Spaceplanes 2.2. Technical aspect As technical features of the spaceplane, air breathing (air suction type) is utilized for an engine in the atmosphere. Because in the normal rocket engine, such as liquid oxygen is included as an oxidizer other than liquid hydrogen as fuel, it is difficult to further improve the performance according to the Tsiolkovsky rocket equation. Therefore, it has been considered to use the oxygen in the air as an oxidizer as a jet engine without mounting any oxidizer. Also, the spaceplane has a lift generation mechanism such as wing and lifting body for atmospheric flight. 2.3. Problems In the past, even though it is expected to lead to significant cost saving of spaceflight if the spaceplane is realized, the development of scramjet engine have faced many difficulties. Therefore, it is necessary to be equipped with multiple types of engines according to flight speed and altitude, and rocket engines are also essential in the outer space. As manned spacecraft of space shuttle successor, Orion capsule spacecraft using disposable rocket and Kliper designed as a Soyuz successor spacecraft are reusable spacecrafts. However, these spacecrafts uses disposable type rockets for their launch. 3. Winged Launcher 3.1. Merits and Demerits of Winged Launcher The main merit of winged launcher is that the spacecraft can come back to pin-point to the runway, which allows that it is not necessary to transport the spacecraft since it returns the shortest location in maintenance field. The next merit is that a large number of recovery corps are unnecessary, and doctors and researchers can treat people in spacecraft and get feedback immediately. On the other hand, the capsule type spacecraft needs a large ship and at least a helicopter and a crane if it is in the sea. Even if it is in land, a helicopter and vehicle are necessary for recovery. The last one is that when it is returning, gravity load and impact on crews and research equipment can be small. The main demerit of winged launcher is that the construction costs and maintenance costs for wings, landing gear, and control system are higher than the capsule type. And, the mission cannot be a long term space flight so that crews would not forget the control feeling and how to control spacecraft. There is a damage risk due to the debris because the heat-resistant panels in the orbit are not covered with anything. Furthermore, during atmospheric re-entry, it is difficult for the winged launcher to be aerodynamic naturally stable compared to the capsule type. 3.2. Prospective winged launcher After the Space Shuttle retirement, the United States left the next manned spacecraft development (CCDev) to the private sector. Even though a lot of spacecraft have been developed at the same time, Dream Chaser spacecraft developed by Sierra Nevada Corporation is the only one winged spacecraft. (Figure 3) In addition, the U.S. Air Force have been developing their own winged unmanned spacecraft called X-37B. Figure 3. Image of Dream Chase Cargo System 4. Dream Chaser Orbital Spacecraft The Dream Chaser Orbital Spacecraft is designed to carry 2-7 people to and from low Earth orbit (LEO). (Figure 4) The vehicle was launched in vertical state by mounting on the Atlas V rocket and lands horizontally on the runway. The size of the Dream Chaser is about one-third of the size of fuselage of the space shuttle, and it is planed that it is possible to re-use 30 times. Figure 4. Rough Design of Dream Chaser Twin hybrid-rocket was adopted to the engine, and propellant was a combination of hydroxyl- terminated polybutadiene (HTPD) and nitrous oxide, which could lead to the gravitational acceleration 1.5G at the time of re-entry. However, this plan was changed, and a liquid propulsion system was adopted because a hybrid motor is required to be replaced every time and costs higher. Table 1. Specification of Dream Chaser Orbital Spacecraft Crew 2-7 Length 9.0 m Wing Span 7.0 m Volume 16.0 m3 Mass 11,300 kg Re-entry Less than 1.5 G 5. Pegasus Pegasus rocket with three-stage solid rocket has a winged-type shape and is mounted on an L- 1011 carrier aircraft. (Figure 5) The Pegasus is released from the carrier aircraft that is flying. This is the first air-launched type of satellite launch rocket, and this can reach to Mach 8 as a flying object with wings. The Pegasus can carry payloads of up to 443 kg into low Earth orbit (LEO). Figure 5. Pegasus mounted on a carrier aircraft The Pegasus is consist of three solid propellant stages and monopropellant fourth stage which is optional. (Table 2) Table 2. Specification of Pegasus spacecraft Pegasus Pegasus hybrid Pegasus XL Total length 15.43 m 15.43 m 17.41 m Wing span 6.71 m 6.71 m 6.71 m Mass 19270 kg 19270 kg 22690 kg Payload to LEO 350 kg 350 kg 440 kg First Stage Engine Orion50S Orion50S Orion50SXL Length 8.86 m 8.86 m 10.27 m Mass 14020 kg 14020 kg 15383 kg Propellant QDL-1 QDL-1 QDL-1 Mass of propellant 12163 kg 12163 kg 15014 kg Thrust (vacuum) 464.8 kN 464.8 kN 625.9 kN Isp (vacuum) 294 s 294 s 295 s Burn time 75.3 s 75.3 s 68.6 s Second Stage Engine Orion50 Orion50 Orion50XL Length 2.67 m 2.67 m 3.11 m Mass 3379 kg 3379 kg 4341 kg Propellant QDL-1 QDL-1 QDL-1 Mass of propellant 3025 kg 3025 kg 3925 kg Thrust (vacuum) 114.5 kN 114.5 kN 160.5 kN Isp (vacuum) 292 s 292 s 289 s Burn time 75.6 s 75.6 s 69.4 s Third Stage Engine Orion38 Length 1.34 m Mass 896 kg Propellant QDL-1 Mass of propellant 770 kg Thrust (vacuum) 32.2 kN Isp (vacuum) 287 s Burn time 68.5 s Fourth Stage (Option) Engine HAPS (MR-107K) Length 0.8 m Mass 100 kg Propellant Hydrazine Mass of propellant 41 kg Thrust (vacuum) 0.67 kN Isp (vacuum) 235 s Burn time 142 s 6. Conclusion This paper introduces several kinds of winged launchers that are cost-effective. The spaceplane is still in the middle of development, but many organizations and universities study and improve the performance of the spaceplane. These effort will reduce the launch cost and enable more deeper space exploration. Also, the Pegasus mission allows to use reusable aircraft, leading to reducing the launch cost. Since this mission has resulted in many successes, further development and saving cost can be expected. 7. References
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Quality and Reliability: APL's Key to Mission Success
    W. L. EBERT AND E. J. HOFFMAN Quality and Reliability: APL’s Key to Mission Success Ward L. Ebert and Eric J. Hoffman APL’s Space Department has a long history of producing reliable spaceflight systems. Key to the success of these systems are the methods employed to ensure robust, failure-tolerant designs, to ensure a final product that faithfully embodies those designs, and to physically verify that launch and environmental stresses will indeed be well tolerated. These basic methods and practices have served well throughout the constantly changing scientific, engineering, and budgetary challenges of the first 40 years of the space age. The Space Department has demonstrated particular competence in addressing the country’s need for small exploratory missions that extend the envelope of technology. (Keywords: Quality assurance, Reliability, Spacecraft, Spaceflight.) INTRODUCTION The APL Space Department attempts to be at the and development is fundamentally an innovative en- high end of the quality and reliability scale for un- deavor, and any plan to carry out such work necessarily manned space missions. A track record of nearly 60 has steps with unknown outcomes. On the other hand, spacecraft and well over 100 instruments bears this out conventional management wisdom says that some de- as a success. Essentially, all of APL’s space missions are gree of risk and unpredictability exists in any major one-of-a-kind, so the challenge is to get it right the first undertaking, and the only element that differs in re- time, every time, by developing the necessary technol- search and development is the larger degree of risks.
    [Show full text]
  • Orion First Flight Test
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration orion First Flight Test NASAfacts Orion, NASA’s new spacecraft Exploration Flight Test-1 built to send humans farther During Orion’s flight test, the spacecraft will launch atop a Delta IV Heavy, a rocket built than ever before, is launching and operated by United Launch Alliance. While into space for the first time in this launch vehicle will allow Orion to reach an altitude high enough to meet the objectives for December 2014. this test, a much larger, human-rated rocket An uncrewed test flight called Exploration will be needed for the vast distances of future Flight Test-1 will test Orion systems critical to exploration missions. To meet that need, NASA crew safety, such as heat shield performance, is developing the Space Launch System, which separation events, avionics and software will give Orion the capability to carry astronauts performance, attitude control and guidance, farther into the solar system than ever before. parachute deployment and recovery operations. During the uncrewed flight, Orion will orbit The data gathered during the flight will influence the Earth twice, reaching an altitude of design decisions and validate existing computer approximately 3,600 miles – about 15 times models and innovative new approaches to space farther into space than the International Space systems development, as well as reduce overall Station orbits. Sending Orion to such a high mission risks and costs. altitude will allow the spacecraft to return to Earth at speeds near 20,000 mph. Returning
    [Show full text]
  • Spacecraft & Vehicle Systems
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Marshall Space Flight Center Spacecraft & Vehicle Systems Engineering Solutions for Space Science and Exploration Marshall’s Spacecraft and Vehicle Systems Department For over 50 years, the Marshall Space Flight Center has devel- for assessment of the orbiter’s thermal protection system prior oped the expertise and capabilities to successfully execute the to reentry and for debris anomaly resolution. In addition, the integrated design, development, test, and evaluation of NASA Natural Environments group supported the day-of -launch I-Load launch vehicles, and spacecraft and science programs. Marshall’s Updates, provided the mean bulk propellant temperature forecast Spacecraft and Vehicle Systems Department (EV) has been a prior to each Shuttle launch, and performed radiation assessments major technical and engineering arm to develop these vehicles of Shuttle avionics systems. Members in the department also and programs in the areas of Systems Engineering & Integration co-chaired several propulsion SE&I panels including panels for (SE&I), flight mechanics and analysis, and structural design and Aerodynamics, Thermal, and Loads disciplines. analysis. EV has performed advanced research and development for future spacecraft and launch vehicle systems, and has estab- EV provides design and analysis support to numerous Science and lished technical partnerships and collaborations with other NASA Mission Systems projects, including the Environmental Control & centers, the Department of Defense, the Department of Energy, Life Support System (ECLSS), the Microgravity Science Research industry, technical professional societies, and academia in order Rack, and the Node elements for the International Space Station. to enhance technical competencies and advanced technologies The department also developed and maintains the Chandra for future spacecraft and vehicle systems.
    [Show full text]
  • The Space Race
    The Space Race Aims: To arrange the key events of the “Space Race” in chronological order. To decide which country won the Space Race. Space – the Final Frontier “Space” is everything Atmosphere that exists outside of our planet’s atmosphere. The atmosphere is the layer of Earth gas which surrounds our planet. Without it, none of us would be able to breathe! Space The sun is a star which is orbited (circled) by a system of planets. Earth is the third planet from the sun. There are nine planets in our solar system. How many of the other eight can you name? Neptune Saturn Mars Venus SUN Pluto Uranus Jupiter EARTH Mercury What has this got to do with the COLD WAR? Another element of the Cold War was the race to control the final frontier – outer space! Why do you think this would be so important? The Space Race was considered important because it showed the world which country had the best science, technology, and economic system. It would prove which country was the greatest of the superpowers, the USSR or the USA, and which political system was the best – communism or capitalism. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xvaEvCNZymo The Space Race – key events Discuss the following slides in your groups. For each slide, try to agree on: • which of the three options is correct • whether this was an achievement of the Soviet Union (USSR) or the Americans (USA). When did humans first send a satellite into orbit around the Earth? 1940s, 1950s or 1960s? Sputnik 1 was launched in October 1957.
    [Show full text]
  • The SKYLON Spaceplane
    The SKYLON Spaceplane Borg K.⇤ and Matula E.⇤ University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 80309, USA This report outlines the major technical aspects of the SKYLON spaceplane as a final project for the ASEN 5053 class. The SKYLON spaceplane is designed as a single stage to orbit vehicle capable of lifting 15 mT to LEO from a 5.5 km runway and returning to land at the same location. It is powered by a unique engine design that combines an air- breathing and rocket mode into a single engine. This is achieved through the use of a novel lightweight heat exchanger that has been demonstrated on a reduced scale. The program has received funding from the UK government and ESA to build a full scale prototype of the engine as it’s next step. The project is technically feasible but will need to overcome some manufacturing issues and high start-up costs. This report is not intended for publication or commercial use. Nomenclature SSTO Single Stage To Orbit REL Reaction Engines Ltd UK United Kingdom LEO Low Earth Orbit SABRE Synergetic Air-Breathing Rocket Engine SOMA SKYLON Orbital Maneuvering Assembly HOTOL Horizontal Take-O↵and Landing NASP National Aerospace Program GT OW Gross Take-O↵Weight MECO Main Engine Cut-O↵ LACE Liquid Air Cooled Engine RCS Reaction Control System MLI Multi-Layer Insulation mT Tonne I. Introduction The SKYLON spaceplane is a single stage to orbit concept vehicle being developed by Reaction Engines Ltd in the United Kingdom. It is designed to take o↵and land on a runway delivering 15 mT of payload into LEO, in the current D-1 configuration.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report of S.P
    ANNUAL REPORT OF S.P. KOROLEV ROCKET AND SPACE PUBLIC CORPORATION ENERGIA FOR 2019 This Annual Report of S.P.Korolev Rocket and Space Public Corporation Energia (RSC Energia) was prepared based upon its performance in 2019 with due regard for the requirements stated in the Russian Federation Government Decree of December 31, 2010 No. 1214 “On Improvement of the Procedure to Control Open Joint-Stock Companies whose Stock is in Federal Ownership and Federal State Unitary Enterprises”, and in accordance with the Regulations “On Information Disclosure by the Issuers of Outstanding Securities” No. 454-P approved by the Bank of Russia on December 30, 2014 Accuracy of the data contained in this Annual Report, including the Report on the interested-party transactions effected by RSC Energia in 2019, was confirmed by RSC Energia’s Auditing Committee Report as of 01.06.2020. This Annual Report was preliminary approved by RSC Energia’s Board of Directors on August 24, 2020 (Minutes No. 31). This Annual Report was approved at RSC Energia’s General Shareholders’ Meeting on September 28, 2020 (Minutes No 40 of 01.10.2020). 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION ABOUT RSC ENERGIA ............................. 6 1.1. Company background .........................................................................................................................6 1.2. Period of the Company operation in the industry ...............................................................................6 1.3. Information about the purchase and sale contracts for participating interests, equities, shares of business partnerships and companies concluded by the Company in 2019 ..............................................7 1.4. Information about the holding structure and the organizations involved ...........................................8 2. PRIORITY DIRECTIONS OF RSC ENERGIA OPERATION ........................ 11 2.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract US Patent References
    Architecture for Reusable Responsive Exploration Systems: ARES - Platform and Reusable Responsive Architecture for Innovative Space Exploration: PRAISE (Part 1) PATENT PENDING Abstract A comprehensive Modular Reusable Responsive Space Exploration Platform (Architecture) composed of multiple modular reusable elements such that the assemblies can be flexibly configured into systems for low earth orbits launches and for long-range exploration such as orbits to moon, Lagrange points and others. This platform & architecture is named as Architecture for Reusable Responsive Exploration System (acronym ARES) / Platform and Reusable Responsive Architecture for Innovative Space Exploration (acronym PRAISE), in short ARES/PRAISE or simply ARES. It is also known as Alpha Spaces Architecture and Platform (acronym ASAP), in short as “αPlatform” or “αArchitecture”, or “αAres”. As an example, the configuration involves reusable lightweight wing, core stage, (optional booster stages) combination of expendable upper stage and reusable crew capsule. Further, the expendable upper stage can be re-used to serve as in-orbit fuel depots and for other innovative uses. This is first part of the multi part patent application. Inventor: Atreya, Dinesh S. US Patent References US Patent 6158693 - Recoverable booster stage and recovery method US Patent 4878637 - Modular space station US Patent 6726154 - Reusable space access launch vehicle system US Patent 6113032 - Delivering liquid propellant in a reusable booster stage US Patent 4557444 - Aerospace vehicle US Patent 4880187 - Multipurpose modular spacecraft US Patent 4452412 - Space shuttle with rail system and aft thrust structure securing solid rocket boosters to external tank US Patent 4802639 - Horizontal-takeoff transatmospheric launch system US Patent 4884770 - Earth-to-orbit vehicle providing a reusable orbital stage US Patent 4265416 - Orbiter/launch system U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The New American Space Age: a Progress Report on Human Spaceflight the New American Space Age: a Progress Report on Human Spaceflight the International Space
    The New American Space Age: A PROGRESS REPORT ON HUMAN SpaCEFLIGHT The New American Space Age: A Progress Report on Human Spaceflight The International Space Station: the largest international scientific and engineering achievement in human history. The New American Space Age: A Progress Report on Human Spaceflight Lately, it seems the public cannot get enough of space! The recent hit movie “Gravity” not only won 7 Academy Awards – it was a runaway box office success, no doubt inspiring young future scientists, engineers and mathematicians just as “2001: A Space Odyssey” did more than 40 years ago. “Cosmos,” a PBS series on the origins of the universe from the 1980s, has been updated to include the latest discoveries – and funded by a major television network in primetime. And let’s not forget the terrific online videos of science experiments from former International Space Station Commander Chris Hadfield that were viewed by millions of people online. Clearly, the American public is eager to carry the torch of space exploration again. Thankfully, NASA and the space industry are building a host of new vehicles that will do just that. American industry is hard at work developing new commercial transportation services to suborbital altitudes and even low Earth orbit. NASA and the space industry are also building vehicles to take astronauts beyond low Earth orbit for the first time since the Apollo program. Meanwhile, in the U.S. National Lab on the space station, unprecedented research in zero-g is paving the way for Earth breakthroughs in genetics, gerontology, new vaccines and much more.
    [Show full text]
  • Tokyo Shortly to Decide on Participation in Russian Kliper Project 14 October 2005
    Tokyo Shortly To Decide On Participation In Russian Kliper Project 14 October 2005 Tokyo intends to decide already this year on its participation in the Russian project to build a non- expendable manned spacecraft, which will be called Kliper. It is expected to replace the American shuttles that are now being used to fly crews and cargoes to the International Space Station, reports Itar-Tass. A special team has already been formed here to look into the problem. Kiioshi Higuchi, member of the Board of Directors of the Japanese National Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), heads the team, the Kyodo Tsushin News Agency reported on Thursday. The European Space Agency, Ukraine, Belarus and Kazakhstan had previously evinced interest in their participation in the new Russian space project. In considering the problem, Tokyo is proceeding primarily from the fact that the United States is determined to discontinue all flights of its shuttles by 2010 and to concentrate its efforts on the preparation of expeditions to the Moon and Mars. The Kliper project will give Russia, the EU countries, and Japan a chance to make effective use of the International Space Station even without America's active participation. A Kliper spacecraft will be able to carry six people and to take to the ISS and bring back five hundred kilograms of cargoes. A rocket will be used to boost it into outer space. A Kliper will be able to fly autonomously for fifteen days running. Its non-expendable recovery capsule is designed for twenty-five flights. The spacecraft will have a service life of ten years.
    [Show full text]
  • Boarding the Spaceplane by Roger D
    PageMark-Color-Comp Job Name: 546280_SpaceTimes_Oct2015 ❏ OK to proceed PDF Page: 01_24_SpaceTimes_Oct2015.p4.pdf ❏ Make corrections and proceed Process Plan: VP.MultiPage.PDF Date: 15-10-01 ❏ Make corrections and show another proof Time: 15:28:48 Signed: ___________________ Date: ______ Operator: ____________________________ Boarding the Spaceplane by Roger D. Launius During the administration of President Ronald Reagan, senior government officials began to discuss the possibility of developing an “Orient Express,” a hybrid air and spaceplane that could carry ordinary people between New York City and Tokyo in about one hour. How is this possible? Actually, the concept is quite simple: Develop an aerospace plane that can take off like a conventional jetliner from an ordinary runway. Flying supersonic, it reaches an altitude of 45,000-50,000 feet, where the pilots start scramjet engines, a jet technology that has the potential to push jetcraft to hypersonic speeds. The spaceplane rises to the edge of space and darts to the opposite side of the globe, where the process is reversed, and the vehicle lands like a conventional airplane. It never reaches orbit, but technically it flies in space. The experience is similar to orbital flight, except for the shorter time. Artist concept of the X-37 advanced technology flight demonstrator re-entering Earth’s atmosphere. The X-37 was intended as a testbed for dozens of advanced structural, propulsion, and operational technologies that could dramatically lower the cost of future reusable launch vehicles. (Source: NASA) 4 SPACE TIMES • September/October 2015 PageMark-Color-Comp Job Name: 546280_SpaceTimes_Oct2015 ❏ OK to proceed PDF Page: 01_24_SpaceTimes_Oct2015.p5.pdf ❏ Make corrections and proceed Process Plan: VP.MultiPage.PDF Date: 15-10-01 ❏ Make corrections and show another proof Time: 15:28:48 Signed: ___________________ Date: ______ Operator: ____________________________ The spaceplane concept has long been a staple of dreams of spaceflight.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Planes and Space Tourism: the Industry and the Regulation of Its Safety
    Space Planes and Space Tourism: The Industry and the Regulation of its Safety A Research Study Prepared by Dr. Joseph N. Pelton Director, Space & Advanced Communications Research Institute George Washington University George Washington University SACRI Research Study 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary…………………………………………………… p 4-14 1.0 Introduction…………………………………………………………………….. p 16-26 2.0 Methodology…………………………………………………………………….. p 26-28 3.0 Background and History……………………………………………………….. p 28-34 4.0 US Regulations and Government Programs………………………………….. p 34-35 4.1 NASA’s Legislative Mandate and the New Space Vision………….……. p 35-36 4.2 NASA Safety Practices in Comparison to the FAA……….…………….. p 36-37 4.3 New US Legislation to Regulate and Control Private Space Ventures… p 37 4.3.1 Status of Legislation and Pending FAA Draft Regulations……….. p 37-38 4.3.2 The New Role of Prizes in Space Development…………………….. p 38-40 4.3.3 Implications of Private Space Ventures…………………………….. p 41-42 4.4 International Efforts to Regulate Private Space Systems………………… p 42 4.4.1 International Association for the Advancement of Space Safety… p 42-43 4.4.2 The International Telecommunications Union (ITU)…………….. p 43-44 4.4.3 The Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (COPUOS).. p 44 4.4.4 The European Aviation Safety Agency…………………………….. p 44-45 4.4.5 Review of International Treaties Involving Space………………… p 45 4.4.6 The ICAO -The Best Way Forward for International Regulation.. p 45-47 5.0 Key Efforts to Estimate the Size of a Private Space Tourism Business……… p 47 5.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility of Reusable Continuous Thrust Spacecraft for Cargo Resupply Missions to Mars
    Feasibility of reusable continuous thrust spacecraft for cargo resupply missions to Mars by C. B. Rabotin M.S., ESIEE Paris, 2011 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Colorado in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Science in Aerospace Engineering Sciences Ann and H.J. Smead Aerospace Engineering Sciences 2017 This thesis entitled: Feasibility of reusable continuous thrust spacecraft for cargo resupply missions to Mars written by C. B. Rabotin has been approved for the Ann and H.J. Smead Aerospace Engineering Sciences Dr. Hanspeter Schaub Dr. Natasha Bosanac Dr. Jay McMahon Date The final copy of this thesis has been examined by the signatories, and we find that both the content and the form meet acceptable presentation standards of scholarly work in the above mentioned discipline. Rabotin, C. B. (M.Sc., Aerospace) Feasibility of reusable continuous thrust spacecraft for cargo resupply missions to Mars Thesis directed by Dr. Hanspeter Schaub Continuous thrust propulsion systems benefit from a much greater efficiency in vacuum than chemical rockets, at the expense of lower instantaneous thrust and high power requirements. The satellite telecommunications industry, known for greatly emphasizing heritage over innovation, now uses electric propulsion for station keeping on a number of spacecraft, and for orbit raising for some smaller satellites, such as the Boeing 702SP platform. Only a few interplanetary missions have relied on continuous thrust for most of their mission, such as ESA's 367 kg SMART-1 and NASA's 1217 kg Dawn mission. The high specific impulse of these continuous thrust engines should make them suitable for transportation of heavy payloads to inner solar system destinations in such a way to limit the dependency on heavy rocket launches.
    [Show full text]