DOCSLIB.ORG

Issues on the Title of the Senkaku Islands: Analysis of the Viewpoints of Japan and China*

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Issues on the Title of the Senkaku Islands: Analysis of the Viewpoints of Japan and China* This article was translated by JIIA from Japanese into English as part of a research project sponsored by the Government of Japan to promote academic studies on the rule of law. JIIA takes full responsibility for the translation of this article. To obtain permission to use this article beyond the scope of your personal use and research, please contact JIIA by e-mail ([email protected]) Citation: Rule of Law Series, Japan Digital Library (March 2015), http://www2.jiia.or.jp/en/digital_library/rule_of_law.php Issues on the Title of the Senkaku Islands: Analysis of the Viewpoints of Japan and China* Kyoko Hamakawa Issue Brief, National Diet Library No. 565 (Feb. 28, 2007) Since 1971, the Chinese government has claimed the territorial title to the Senkaku Islands, asserting that they have been Chinese territory since the time of the Ming Dynasty. On the other hand, the Japanese government takes the position that there exists no issue of the territorial title to be resolved concerning the islands. This paper compares and examines the viewpoints of Japan and China over the territorial title to the Senkaku Islands. The main arguments can be broadly divided as follows; (1) before 1895, when Japan incorporated the islands, whether they were terra nullius or Chinese territory; (2) if Japan’s territorial incorporation of the islands by its Cabinet Decision was conducted in a valid manner; and (3) if Japan has exercised sovereignty over the islands continuously and peace- fully since the territorial incorporation. The last argument whether sovereignty has been exercised continuously and peacefully is regarded as particularly crucial in the past international adjudications on territorial disputes. Introduction The Senkaku Islands are currently an uninhabited group of islands comprised of Uotsuri Island, Kuba Island (also known as Kobi-sho Island), Taisho Island (also known as Kumeakashima Island or Sekibi- sho Island), Kitakojima Island, and Minamikojima Island, Tobise Island, Okinokitaiwa Island, and Okinominamiiwa Island. It was thought that the islands had little economic value. However, the scien- tific survey by the United Nations Economic Commission for Asia and the Far East (ECAFE) in 1968 concluded that the continental shelf in the East China Sea might contain prolific oil reserves and after that, the islands quickly became the focus of attention. In the early 1970s, China began to claim territorial title of the islands.1 After reviewing how the attribution of territories is determined in international law, this paper will summarize and examine the arguments on the territorial title of the Senkaku Islands. * This article was originallypublished as 濱川今日子「尖閣諸島の領有をめぐる論点―日中両国の見解を中心に」『調査と情報 -Issue Brief』No. 565, 国立国会図書館調査及び立法考査局、2007 年 2 月、1-10 頁 . 1 Statement by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Government of the People’s Republic of China (December 30, 1971), reproduced in Kazankai, Nitchu Kankei Kihon Shiryoshu 1949 nen-1997 nen [Collection of Basic Documents on Japan-China Relations from 1949 to 1997] (1998), pp. 401-402. Taiwan also independently claims title to the Senkaku Islands, but it is beyond the scope of this paper. 1 Figure 1: The composition of the Senkaku Islands Figure 2: The Location of Uotsuri Island Kuba Island Taisho China Island Okinawa Kume Island Island Approx. 27 km 330 km Okinokitaiwa Uotsuri Island Island 170 km 410 km Approx. 110 km Uotsuri 170 km Island 150 km Okinominamiiwa Island Taiwan Ishigaki Island Approx. 5 km Yonaguni Island Tobise Kitakojima Island Island Minamikojima Island Sounce: Each map is from the website of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs I. International Law concerning the Attribution of Territory A territory belongs to the state that possesses the title to that territory. Territorial title provides the foun- dation or grounds that enable a state to validly exercise sovereignty over a specific territory.2 As the modes for states to acquire territorial title, occupation, accretion, cession, annexation, conquest, and prescription have traditionally been recognized.3 Among these modes of acquisition, Japan bases its title to the Senkaku Islands on occupation. 1. Theory of Occupation Occupation means that a state occupies effectively terra nullius, an area that does not belong to any state, with an intention to possess that territory. A state generally expresses its intention to possess a territory through a declaration or a notification to other states that it will incorporate the relevant area into its own territories. However, according to the mainstream opinions, neither a declaration nor a notification is an absolute requirement in order for a state to show its intention to acquire a territory because its intention can be assumed from specific state activities and other relevant facts.4 Effective occupation, in other words, signifies the substantive state activities that prove the inten- tion of possession. Today, it is said that physical occupation in the form of the actual use or settlement is not necessarily required and that social possession in the sense of establishing sovereignty is considered to be sufficient.5 2. The Importance of the Continuous and Peaceful Display of Territorial Sovereignty in the International Judicial Precedents In a traditional legal theory, once a state has acquired territorial title, this immediately generates opposability 2 Takane Sugihara et al., Gendai Kokusaiho Kogi dai 3 pan [Lectures on Modern International Law] (3rd ed., 2003), p. 105. 3 The respective definitions are briefly summarized in Akira Kotera, Paradaimu Kokusaiho: Kokusaihou no Kihon Kosei [Paradigms in International Law: the Basic Structure of International Law] (2004), pp. 121-122. 4 Sugihara, supra note 2, p. 106. 5 Shuichi Furutani, “Kokusaihou ni okeru Ryodo/Kokkyo” [Territories and Borders in International Law], Yurashia Kenkyu [Eurasian Studies], Vol. 34 (2006), p. 34. 2 to all other states. Hence, there should be no concurrent claims of the title among states to a specific area. In reality, however, a dispute may occur under the circumstances where it is not clear if a state has acquired the territorial title. In these instances, each state concerned brings different evidence to claim its title and it is difficult to reach an all-or-nothing judgment based on a traditional theory, in which a single state absolutely possesses the title and others do not. In the Island of Palmas case (1928),6 without relying on the traditional modes of territorial acqui- sition, such as occupation and prescription, the Permanent Court of Arbitration applied the element whether the title acquired had been maintained, by stating that “the continuous and peaceful display of territorial sovereignty … is as good as a title.”7 It can be said that in this case, the court made the judgement based on a comparative factor that which of the parties had controlled the disputed territory more effectively. Since the Island of Palmas case, this legal principle of effective control has been followed as a judicial precedent for territorial disputes. Additionally, it is considered to be highly important the recognition or the acquiescence of other states, especially the other party in the dispute, to a continuous display of “actual control,” since it proves the peacefulness.8 3. The Critical Date The date that the dispute arose or that the territorial title was established is called the “critical date.” International law recognizes only the facts and the state activities occurred prior to a critical date as evidence. There is no single method for determining a critical date and ultimately it is entrusted to the judgment of court. There are some cases where the parties to a dispute claimed different critical dates but courts did not specifically admit these dates.9 II. The Bases of Claims before the Territorial Incorporation of the Senkaku Islands into Japan China claims concerning the Senkaku Islands that “as early as the Ming Dynasty, these islands were already included in China’s coastal defence zone, and they were […] part of the islands appertaining to Taiwan, China. The boundary between the territories of China and the Ryukyus was marked between Sekibi-sho Island and Kume Island.”10 In the following sections, the author will review the documents that are considered to be evidence to support China’s claim that historically the Senkaku Islands have been its territory, and then will examine the validity of this claim. 1. “The Coastal Defense Zone” In the 1560s Japanese pirates, wako (in Chinese wokou), raged around the central and southern coasts of China in the 1560s and they were a serious threat to the Ming Dynasty.11 It is said that China established a coastal defense zone against wako, within which China claims that the Senkaku Islands were included. 6 This is a case concerning the territorial title of the Island of Palmas off the coast of Mindanao in the Philippines between the United States and the Netherlands. Island of Palmas (Netherlands v. U.S.), Reports of International Arbitral Awards, Vol. 2 (1948), pp. 829-871. 7 Ibid., p. 839. 8 Akira Kotera, “Paradaimu Kokusaiho (dai 10 kai): Rikuchi to Tairikudana no Kizoku” [Paradigms in International Law (Lecture No. 10): Attribution of Land and Continental Shelf], Hogaku Kyoshitsu [Legal Classroom], No.256 (2002), p. 132. 9 See the judgement by the International Court of Justice on the Minquiers and Ecrehos (United Kingdom v. France), Advisory Opinions and Orders, I.C.J. Reports1953, pp. 47-109. 10 Kazankai, supra note 1, p. 402. 11 Kyodai Toyoshi
Load more

Recommended publications
  • THE DREAM HOTEL Representatives of Japan and China Signed The
    CHAPTER SIX THE DREAM HOTEL Representatives of Japan and China signed the Treaty of Shimonoseki on 17 April 1895, bringing the Sino-Japanese War to an end and alerting the world to Japan’s emergence as a military power in East Asia and its suc- cess, after a mere three decades, in the project of modernisation and industrialisation. Shumpanrō, the Japanese inn where the cosignatories gathered, was only a few steps away from the house acquired by Holme, Ringer & Co. in 1890 to serve as a residence for their agent in Shimonoseki (see Chapter 8). In addition to recognition of Korean independence, the terms of the Treaty of Shimonoseki included China’s cession of Formosa (Taiwan) and the Penghu (Pescadores) Islands to Japan, as well as rights to the stra- tegic Liaotong (Liaodong) Peninsula. China also granted permission for Japanese companies to operate ships on the Yangtze River and establish manufacturing facilities in Shanghai and other treaty ports, advantages similar to those won by Britain in the wake of the Opium Wars. China had to pay a crushing war indemnity of some 200 million silver taels, again simulating the terms of the Treaty of Nanking and Treaty of Tientsin ear- lier in the century. Victory brought Japan headlong into the commercial, political and military maelstrom of East Asia and translated into a sharp boost in Nagasaki’s fortunes as the closest port to China and a coal depot, supply harbour and rest place for foreign warships and merchantmen. In early 1896, the local English-language newspaper reported that: During the year 1895 no less than 160 different men-of-war of all nationalities visited Nagasaki.
    [Show full text]
  • Pictures of an Island Kingdom Depictions of Ryūkyū in Early Modern Japan
    PICTURES OF AN ISLAND KINGDOM DEPICTIONS OF RYŪKYŪ IN EARLY MODERN JAPAN A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I AT MĀNOA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN ART HISTORY MAY 2012 By Travis Seifman Thesis Committee: John Szostak, Chairperson Kate Lingley Paul Lavy Gregory Smits Table of Contents Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………… 1 Chapter I: Handscroll Paintings as Visual Record………………………………. 18 Chapter II: Illustrated Books and Popular Discourse…………………………. 33 Chapter III: Hokusai Ryūkyū Hakkei: A Case Study……………………………. 55 Conclusion………………………………………………………………………………………. 78 Appendix: Figures …………………………………………………………………………… 81 Works Cited ……………………………………………………………………………………. 106 ii Abstract This paper seeks to uncover early modern Japanese understandings of the Ryūkyū Kingdom through examination of popular publications, including illustrated books and woodblock prints, as well as handscroll paintings depicting Ryukyuan embassy processions within Japan. The objects examined include one such handscroll painting, several illustrated books from the Sakamaki-Hawley Collection, University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa Library, and Hokusai Ryūkyū Hakkei, an 1832 series of eight landscape prints depicting sites in Okinawa. Drawing upon previous scholarship on the role of popular publishing in forming conceptions of “Japan” or of “national identity” at this time, a media discourse approach is employed to argue that such publications can serve as reliable indicators of understandings
    [Show full text]
  • Transformation of the Dualistic International Order Into the Modern Treaty System in the Sino-Korean Relationship
    International Journal of Korean History (Vol.15 No.2, Aug.2010) 97 G Transformation of the Dualistic International Order into the Modern Treaty System in the Sino-Korean Relationship Song Kue-jin* IntroductionG G Whether in the regional or global scale, the international order can be defined as a unique system within which international issues develop and the diplomatic relations are preserved within confined time periods. The one who has leadership in such international order is, in actuality, the superpowers regardless of the rationale for their leading positions, and the orderliness of the system is determined by their political and economic prowess.1 The power that led East Asia in the pre-modern era was China. The pre- modern East Asian regional order is described as the tribute system. The tribute system is built on the premise of installation, so it was important that China designate and proclaim another nation as a tributary state. The system was not necessarily a one-way imposition; it is possible to view the system built on mutual consent as the tributary state could benefit from China’s support and preserve the domestic order at times of political instability to person in power. Modern capitalism challenged and undermined the East Asian tribute GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG * HK Research Professor, ARI, Korea University 98 Transformation of the Dualistic International Order into the ~ system led by China, and the East Asian international relations became a modern system based on treaties. The Western powers brought the former tributary states of China into the outer realm of the global capitalistic system. With the arrival of Western imperialistic powers, the East Asian regional order faced an inevitable transformation.
    [Show full text]
  • Sino-US Relations and Ulysses S. Grant's Mediation
    Looking for a Friend: Sino-U.S. Relations and Ulysses S. Grant’s Mediation in the Ryukyu/Liuqiu 琉球 Dispute of 1879 Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Chad Michael Berry Graduate Program in East Asian Studies The Ohio State University 2014 Thesis Committee: Christopher A. Reed, Advisor Robert J. McMahon Ying Zhang Copyright by Chad Michael Berry 2014 Abstract In March 1879, Japan announced the end of the Ryukyu (Liuqiu) Kingdom and the establishment of Okinawa Prefecture in its place. For the previous 250 years, Ryukyu had been a quasi-independent tribute-sending state to Japan and China. Following the arrival of Western imperialism to East Asia in the 19th century, Japan reacted to the changing international situation by adopting Western legal standards and clarifying its borders in frontier areas such as the Ryukyu Islands. China protested Japanese actions in Ryukyu, though Qing Dynasty (1644-1912) leaders were not willing to go to war over the islands. Instead, Qing leaders such as Li Hongzhang (1823-1901) and Prince Gong (1833-1898) sought to resolve the dispute through diplomatic means, including appeals to international law, rousing global public opinion against Japan, and, most significantly, requesting the mediation of the United States and former U.S. President Ulysses S. Grant (1822-1885). Initially, China hoped Grant’s mediation would lead to a restoration of the previous arrangement of Ryukyu being a dually subordinate kingdom to China and Japan. In later negotiations, China sought a three-way division of the islands among China, Japan, and Ryukyu.
    [Show full text]
  • Disputes Over the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands: Communication Tactics and Grand Strategies Chin-Chung Chao University of Nebraska at Omaha, [email protected]
    University of Nebraska at Omaha DigitalCommons@UNO Communication Faculty Publications School of Communication 6-2014 Disputes over the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands: Communication Tactics and Grand Strategies Chin-Chung Chao University of Nebraska at Omaha, [email protected] Dexin Tian Savannah College of Art and Design, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/commfacpub Part of the Communication Commons Recommended Citation Chao, Chin-Chung and Tian, Dexin, "Disputes over the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands: Communication Tactics and Grand Strategies" (2014). Communication Faculty Publications. 85. https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/commfacpub/85 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Communication at DigitalCommons@UNO. It has been accepted for inclusion in Communication Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Journal of International Relations and Foreign Policy June 2014, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 19-47 ISSN: 2333-5866 (Print), 2333-5874 (Online) Copyright © The Author(s). 2014. All Rights Reserved. Published by American Research Institute for Policy Development Disputes over the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands: Communication Tactics and Grand Strategies Chin-Chung Chao1 and Dexin Tian2 Abstract This study explores the communication tactics and grand strategies of each of the involved parties in the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands disputes. Under the theoretical balance between liberal
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Developments in Japan-China Relations - Basic Facts on the Senkaku Islands and the Recent Incident
    Recent Developments in Japan-China Relations - Basic Facts on the Senkaku Islands and the Recent Incident - Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan October 2010 1 Senkaku Islands ◦ Location ◦ The Basic Facts of the Senkaku Islands Obstruction of the execution of official duty by a Chinese fishing trawler (September 7, 2010) Recent Developments in Japan-China Relations Japan’s Position (Statement by MOFA Press Secretary on September 25 2010) 2 China 330km Uotsuri-Shima Okinawa 170km 410km Japan 170km Taiwan Ishigaki-Shima East China Sea Main island of Okinawa Ishigaki-Shima Kuba-Shima Taisho-To About 27km About Uotsuri-Shima 110km Kitako-Shima About 5km Minamiko-Shima ◦ From 1885 on, the Senkaku Islands had been thoroughly surveyed by the Government of Japan through the agencies of Okinawa Prefecture and by way of other methods. Through these surveys, it was confirmed that the Senkaku Islands had been uninhabited and showed no trace of having been under the control of China. Based on this confirmation, the Government of Japan made a Cabinet Decision on 14 January 1895 to erect a marker on the Islands to formally incorporate the Senkaku Islands into the territory of Japan. ◦ Since then, the Senkaku Islands have continuously remained as an integral part of the Nansei Shoto Islands which are the territory of Japan. These islands were neither part of Taiwan nor part of the Pescadores Islands which were ceded to Japan from the Qing Dynasty of China in accordance with Article II of the Treaty of Shimonoseki which came into effect in May of 1895. ◦ Accordingly, the Senkaku Islands are not included in the territory which Japan renounced under Article II of the San Francisco Peace Treaty.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Dokdo
    Resolution of Territorial Disputes in East Asia: The Case of Dokdo Laurent Mayali & John Yoo* This Article seeks to contribute to solving of the Korea-Japan territorial dispute over Dokdo island (Korea)/Takeshima (Japanese). The Republic of Korea argues that Dokdo has formed a part of Korea since as early as 512 C.E.; as Korea currently exercises control over the island, its claim to discovery would appear to fulfill the legal test for possession of territory. Conversely, the Japanese government claims that Korea never exercised sufficient sovereignty over Dokdo. Japan claims that the island remained terra nullius—in other words, territory not possessed by any nation and so could be claimed—until it annexed Dokdo in 1905. Japan also claims that in the 1951 peace treaty ending World War II, the Allies did not include Dokdo in the list of islands taken from Japan, which implies that Japan retained the island in the postwar settlement. This article makes three contributions. First, it brings forward evidence from the maps held at various archives in the United States and Western Europe to determine the historical opinions of experts and governments about the possession of Dokdo. Second, it clarifies the factors that have guided international tribunals in their resolution of earlier disputes involving islands and maritime territory. Third, it shows how the claim of terra nullius has little legitimate authority when applied to East Asia, an area where empires, kingdoms, and nation-states had long exercised control over territory. * Laurent Mayali is the Lloyd M. Robbins Professor of Law, University of California at Berkeley School of Law; John Yoo is the Emanuel S.
    [Show full text]
  • US Ambiguity on the Senkakus' Sovereignty
    Naval War College Review Volume 72 Article 8 Number 3 Summer 2019 2019 Origins of a “Ragged Edge”—U.S. Ambiguity on the Senkakus’ Sovereignty Robert C. Watts IV Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review Recommended Citation Watts, Robert C. IV (2019) "Origins of a “Ragged Edge”—U.S. Ambiguity on the Senkakus’ Sovereignty," Naval War College Review: Vol. 72 : No. 3 , Article 8. Available at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol72/iss3/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Naval War College Review by an authorized editor of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Watts: Origins of a “Ragged Edge”—U.S. Ambiguity on the Senkakus’ Sovere ORIGINS OF A “RAGGED EDGE” U.S. Ambiguity on the Senkakus’ Sovereignty Robert C. Watts IV n May 15, 1972, the United States returned Okinawa and the other islands in the Ryukyu chain to Japan, culminating years of negotiations that some have 1 Ohailed as “an example of diplomacy at its very best�” As a result, Japan regained territories it had lost at the end of World War II, while the United States both retained access to bases on Okinawa and reaffirmed strategic ties with Japan� One detail, however, complicates this win-win assessment� At the same time, Japan also regained administrative control over the Senkaku, or Diaoyu, Islands, a group of uninhabited—and uninhabitable—rocky outcroppings in the East China Sea�2 By 1972, both the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and the Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan also had claimed these islands�3 Despite passing con- trol of the Senkakus to Japan, the United States expressed no position on any of the competing claims to the islands, including Japan’s� This choice—not to weigh in on the Senkakus’ sovereignty—perpetuated Commander Robert C.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Empires and Indigenous Peoples, Global Transformation and the Limits of International Society
    Introduction Empires and Indigenous Peoples, Global Transformation and the Limits of International Society PROLOGUE: THE WUSHE REBELLION AND INDIGENOUS RENAISSANCE IN TAIWAN On October 27, 1930, terror visited the small community of Japanese settler- expatriates in the picturesque resort town of Wushe, an administrative center nestled on a plateau in the central mountains of Taiwan.1 On that day, some 300 indigenes led by Mona Ludao raided government arsenals, ambushed isolated police units, and turned a school assembly into a bloodbath. All told, Mona’s men killed 134 Japanese nationals by day’s end, many of them butchered with long dag- gers and beheaded. Alerted by a distressed phone call from an escapee, the Japanese police apparatus, with backing from military units stationed in Taiwan, responded with genocidal fury. Aerial bombardment, infantry sweeps, and local mercenaries killed roughly 1,000 men, women, and children in the ensuing months. A cor- nered Mona Ludao removed to the countryside and then killed his family and hanged himself to avoid capture. Subsequently, the Japanese government relocated the remaining residents of Mona’s village, Mehebu, forever wiping it off the map.2 Over the course of Japanese rule (1895–1945), the Taiwan Government- General forcibly relocated hundreds of other hamlets like Mehebu. The invasive and exploitative policies that provoked Mona and his confederates also eroded pre- colonial forms of social organization, authority, and ritual life among Taiwan’s indigenes. As it severed bonds between indigenes and their lands, in addition to prohibiting or reforming folkways it deemed injurious to its civilizing mission, the government-general nonetheless laid the groundwork for the emergence of Taiwan Indigenous Peoples as a conscious and agentive historical formation.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Article
    Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 171 International Conference on Art Studies: Science, Experience, Education (ICASSEE 2017) Research on the Artistic Characteristics and Cultural Connotation of Women's Headgear and Hairdo of She Nationality in Fujian Province Xu Chen Clothing and Design Faculty Minjiang University Fashion Design Center of Fujian Province Fuzhou, China Jiangang Wang* Yonggui Li Clothing and Design Faculty Clothing and Design Faculty Minjiang University Minjiang University Fashion Design Center of Fujian Province Fashion Design Center of Fujian Province Fuzhou, China Fuzhou, China *Corresponding Author Abstract—In this paper, the author takes women's of She nationality includes the phoenix coronet and the headgear and hairdo of She nationality in modern times as the hairdo worn by women. According to the scholar Pan objects of study. With the historical materials and the Hongli's views, the hairdo of She nationality of Fujian literature, this paper investigates the characteristics of province can be divided into Luoyuan style, Fuan style women's headgear and hairdo of She nationality in Fujian (including Ningde), Xiapu style, Fuding style (including province, and analyzes the distribution and historical origin of Zhejiang and Anhui), Shunchang style, Guangze style and women's headgear and hairdo of She nationality in Fujian Zhangping style [1]. The author believes that the current province. Based on the theoretical foundation of semiotics and women hairdo of She nationality of Fujian province only folklore, this paper analyzes the symbolic language and the retain the four forms of Luoyuan, Fuan (the same with implication of the symbols of women's headgear and hairdo of Ningde), the eastern Xiapu, the western Xiapu (the same She nationality, and reveals the connotation of the ancestor worship, reproductive worship, migratory memory, love and with Fuding).
    [Show full text]
  • 251 1. Wushe Is in Today's Ren'ai Township in Nantou Prefecture
    Notes INTRODUCTION 1. Wushe is in today’s Ren’ai Township in Nantou Prefecture, Taiwan. 2. Taiwan sōtokufu keimukyoku, ed., Takasagozoku chōsasho dai go hen: Bansha gaikyō, meishin (Taipei: Taiwan sōtokufu keimukyoku, 1938), 132–33. 3. Ronald Niezen, The Origins of Indigenism: Human Rights and the Politics of Identity (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003); James Clifford, Returns: Becoming Indig- enous in the Twenty-First Century (Harvard University Press, 2013). 4. Laura R. Graham and H. Glenn Penny, “Performing Indigeneity: Emergent Identity, Self-Determination, and Sovereignty,” in Performing Indigeneity: Global Histories and Con- temporary Experiences, ed. Laura R. Graham and H. Glenn Penny (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2014), 1–5. 5. Wang Fu-chang, Zokugun: Gendai Taiwan no esunikku imajineeshon, trans. Matsuba Jun and Hung Yuru (Tokyo: Tōhō shoten, 2014), 86–87. 6. Anthropologist Scott Simon writes that “ . today’s political debates about Indigenous rights are rooted in an unfolding political dynamic that predates both the global indigenous rights movement and even the arrival of the ROC on Taiwan. What we know today as Indigenous Formosa is a co-creation of the resulting relationship between the Japanese state and diverse political constellations among many Austronesian peoples across the is- land.” From “Making Natives: Japan and the Creation of Indigenous Formosa,” in Japanese Taiwan: Colonial Rule and Its Contested Legacy, ed. Andrew Morris (London: Bloomsbury Press, 2015), 75. 7. “Taiwan Indigenous Peoples” is an English translation of Taiwan Yuanzhuminzu, the officially adopted name for indigenous peoples in Taiwan. This book will use the term indigenes to avoid awkward constructions and wordiness.
    [Show full text]
  • Population and Migration Characteristics of Fujian Province, China, by Judith Banister, Christina Wu Harbaugh, and Ellen Jamison (1 993)
    Population and Migration Characteristics of Fujian Province, China by Judith Banister, Christina Wu Harbaugh, and Ellen Jamison Center for International Research U.S. Bureau of the Census Washington, D.C. 20233-3700 CIR Staff Paper No. 70 November 1993 CIR STAFF PAPER No. 70 Population and Migration Characteristics of Fujian Province, China by Judith Banister, Christina Wu Harbaugh, and Ellen Jamison Center for International Research U.S. Bureau of the Census Washington, D.C. 20233-3700 November 1993 SUMMARY POPULATION AND LABOR FORCE Fujian province had nearly 30 million inhabitants in 1990, an increase from just over 12 million in 1950. Like China as a whole, Fujian province has a fairly high sex ratio, about 107 males per 100 females. The agricultural population continues to be predominant, but the nonagricultural sector is growing faster. Fujian's birth rate was reported to be about 18 per 1,000 population in 1992, having declined from a post-famine high of 45 per 1,000 around 1963. On average in 1989, Fujian women had about 2.4 children, only marginally higher than the average for all China, and by 1992 the number of births per women had declined further. For the past two decades, the reported death rate has remained fairly steady at about 6 per 1,000 population. The employed Fujian labor force has increased substantially, from 10 million workers in 1982 to 14 million in 1991. Although the majority are still employed in agriculture, the proportions in services and industry are increasing faster. Agricultural workers in Fujian are far more likely than nonagricultural workers to be illiterate or only semi-literate.
    [Show full text]