DOCSLIB.ORG

Taiwan's Sovereignty Claim Over the Diaoyutai Island Group & The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Taiwan's Sovereignty Claim Over the Diaoyutai Island Group & The Taiwan’s Sovereignty Claim over the Diaoyutai Island Group (DIG) & the Proposed East China Sea Peace Initiative (ECSPI) Yann-huei Song Research Fellow Institute of European and American Studies/CAPAS Academia Sinica, Taipei Taiwan, R.O.C. 12. 2012 Maritime Disputes in the Asia-Pacific Region • For countries in the Asia-Pacific region, the cause for concern is the development trend of maritime activities conducted by the countries that border the Sea of Okhotsk, Sea of Japan, Yellow Sea, the East China Sea, the South China Sea, and the Indian Ocean. Potential Flashpoints in the Asia-Pacific Region ■ Kuril Islands/ Northern Territories ■ ■ Dokdo/Take- shima Diaoyutai DiaoyutaiIsland Group Paracel Islands ■ Scarborough Spratly Shoal Islands Potential Flashpoints in the Asia-Pacific Region Existing Disputes over Island Sovereignty and Maritime Rights • Southern Kuril Islands/Northern Territories Disputes (Russian Federation/Japan) • Dokdo/Takeshima (Korea and Japan) • Okinotorishima (Japan, China, Korea, and Taiwan） • Socotra/Suyan Rock/Ieodo （Korea and China) • Diaoyutai Island Group/Diaoyu Dao/Senkaku Islands (China, Japan, and Taiwan) • Paracel Islands (Vietnam, China, and Taiwan) • Scarborough Shoal （The Philippines, China, and Taiwan) • Spratly Islands (China, Vietnam, the Philippines, Brunei, Malaysia, and Taiwan) • EEZ and Continental Shelf Maritime Delimitation (The SCS and the ECS Bordering Countries) (Mainly involving with Mainland China, Japan, and Taiwan) Japan Tokyo Governor visited Okinotorishima Tokyo Governor Shintaro Ishihara waved the Japanese national flag near the plate that declares "Okinotorishima, Japan" in Japanese after landing on Higashi Kojima, one of the two Okinotorishima islets, about 1,730 kilometers (1,070 miles) south of capital Tokyo, during an inspection tour in May 2005. No territorial dispute involved, But legal status of the land feature. Kuril Islands/Northern Territories Disputes (Russia and Japan) Russian Prime Minister Medvedev visited the Kuril Island of Kunashir in July 2012 to reinforce the Russian claim to the islands. The islands were occupied by Russia at the end of the second World War. Ever since Japan and Russia have been at loggerheads over the issue of ownership. Iturup (Russian: Итуруп)/Etorofu Island (Japanese: 択捉島, Etorofu-tō?) Kunashir (Russian: Кунашир)/Kunashiri Island (Japanese: 国後島, Kunashiri-tō?) Shikotan (Russian: Шикотан)/Shikotan Island (Japanese: 色丹島, Shikotan-tō?) Habomai rocks (Russian: острова Хабомаи ostrova Habomai)/Habomai Islands (Japanese: 歯 舞諸島, Habomai-shotō?) Dokdo/Takeshima (Korea and Japan) • ROK President Lee Myung- bak flew to Dokdo/ Takeshima in August 2012. • Japan recalled its ambassador from South Korea. • Both South Korea and Japan say they have a historical claim to the islands, and the issue has been a long-standing thorn in relations. Japan Tokyo Governor visited Okinotorishima Tokyo Governor Shintaro Ishihara waved the Japanese national flag near the plate that declares "Okinotorishima, Japan" in Japanese after landing on Higashi Kojima, one of the two Okinotorishima islets, about 1,730 kilometers (1,070 miles) south of capital Tokyo, during an inspection tour in May 2005. No territorial dispute involved, But legal status of the land feature. President Ma visited Pengjia Islet in the East China Sea (7.Sept.2012) Unlikely to visit the Diaoyutai Island Group, but how about Taiping Dao (Itu Aba) in the South China Sea? 習近平接任中共總書 記與中央軍委主席 李克強任國務院總理 Xi Jinping visits Woody Island? The Development Goal of PRC • In a report to the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party by Hu Jintao, the PRC government explicitly outlined its policy to “resolutely safeguard China’s maritime rights and interests, and build China into a maritime power.” Japan’s Concern about PRC’s Maritime Activities • Japan is hoping that the development goal of PRC’s maritime policy will be achieved in accordance with international law and in harmony with neighboring nations. • While Japan is taking the view that the PRC appears to be attempting to make the practice of dispatching government vessels to the ECS and the SCS areas an everyday affair, and therefore change the status quo through coercion, the PRC government considers its assertive moves necessary, mainly in response to the assertive actions taken by other claimants in the ECS and the SCS, which change the status quo or break their political commitments under the agreement, such as Japan and PRC’s understanding reached in 1978; and Vietnam’s and the Philippines’ commitments made in 2002 under the Declaration on the Conduct of the Parties in the South China Sea (DOC). Are Certain Territories in the Asia Pacific Disputed or Not Disputed? • South Korea says that there is no dispute over Dokdo/Takeshima; Japan says YES, it is disputed. • Russia says that there is no dispute at all over Southern Kuril Islands/Northern Territories; Japan says, YES, it is disputed. • Japan says that Okinotorishima is an island, not a rock; PRC and ROK say no, it is not an island, but a rock, and therefore cannot generate a 200 nautical mile EEZ. • PRC says that there are no disputes over the Paracel Islands and Scarborough Shoal, but Vietnam and the Philippines say YES, they are disputed. • Japan says that there is no dispute over the DIG; PRC and ROC say YES, it is disputed. Why did Japan purchase three of the DIG in September 2012? • The objective was to minimize any adverse impact on the Japan-China relationship, according to Japanese Foreign Minisiter Koichiro Gemba. • According to Japan, there is no doubt that the DIG are an inherent part of Japan, as evidenced by both historical facts and international law. • Japan insists that it cannot make any concessions where sovereignty is concerned. • Tokyo Governor Shintaro Ishihara announced his intention in April 2012 to buy and develop facilities on the islands. Purchasing the islands instead was the only viable and best option available to the government of Japan to protect bilateral relations, argued by the Japanese government. • Is this position acceptable? In fact, Japanese government’s decision to nationalize the DIG has more profound negative effect than Ishihara’s plan. • (Koichiro Gemba, Foreign Minister of Japan, “Japan-China Relations at a Crossroads,” The International Herald Tribune, 21 November 2012) Why does not Japan refer the issue to the International Court of Justice? • This is a question that is often wrongly directed toward Japan. It is Japan that has valid control over the DIG under international law, and it is China that is seeking to challenge the status quo. The question should be posed to China. • Japan has accepted the jurisdiction of the I.C.J. as compulsory. Since China is undertaking various campaigns to promote their assertions in international forums, it seems to make sense for China to seek a solution based on international law. • Why don’t they show any signs of accepting the jurisdiction of the I.C.J. as compulsory and taking their arguments to the I.C.J.? (Japan admits that there involves dispute over the DIG first). (Koichiro Gemba, Foreign Minister of Japan, “Japan-China Relations at a Crossroads,” The International Herald Tribune, 21 November 2012) The DIG in the ECS: Disputed or Not Disputed? • It is difficult to accept Japan’s position that the DIG is not disputed. • If Japan insists that there is no territorial dispute over the DIG, why did the U.S. government return only the administrative rights to Japan, but not ownership (sovereignty), in accordance with the 1971 Okinawa Reversion Treaty? • Apparently there is a key difference between “Administration” and “Sovereignty”. Treaty of Shimonoseki Signed at Shimonoseki 17 April 1895 Entered into Force 8 May 1895 by the exchange of the instruments of ratification Article 2 China cedes to Japan in perpetuity and full sovereignty the following territories, together with all fortifications, arsenals, and public property thereon:— (b) The island of Formosa [Taiwan], together with all islands appertaining or belonging to the said island of Formosa. (Emphasis added) (Note: The DIG are appertained to Taiwan) 1945 Potsdam Declaration • Proclamation Defining Terms for Japanese Surrender, Issued at Potsdam, 26 July 1945 • Article 8: The terms of the Cairo Declaration shall be carried out and Japanese sovereignty shall be limited to the islands of Honshu, Hokkaido, Kyushu, Shikoku and such minor islands as we determine. 1951 San Francisco Peace Treaty Articles 2 (b) Japan renounces all right, title and claim to Formosa [Taiwan] and the Pescadores. (c) Japan renounces all right, title and claim to the Kurile Islands, and to that portion of Sakhalin and the islands adjacent to it over which Japan acquired sovereignty as a consequence of the Treaty of Portsmouth of September 5, 1905. (f) Japan renounces all right, title and claim to the Spratly Islands and to the Paracel Islands. Japan’s Basic View on the Sovereignty over the DIG/Senkaku Islands • From 1885 on, surveys of the DIG had been thoroughly made by the Government of Japan through the agencies of Okinawa Prefecture and by way of other methods. Through these surveys, it was confirmed that the DIG had been uninhabited and showed no trace of having been under the control of Qing China. • Based on this confirmation, the Government of Japan made a Cabinet Decision on 14 January 1895 to erect a marker on the Islands to formally incorporate the DIG into the territory of Japan. Japan’s Territorial Claim Based on “Incomplete Surveys” and “WRONG CONFIRMATION” • Following the first on-site survey, in 1885, the Japanese foreign minister wrote, “Chinese newspapers have been reporting rumors of our intention of occupying islands belonging to China located next to Taiwan.… At this time, if we were to publicly place national markers, this must necessarily invite China’s suspicion.…” • In November 1885, the Okinawa governor confirmed “since this matter is not unrelated to China, if problems do arise I would be in grave repentance for my responsibility”.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pacnetnumber 59 July 18, 2016
    Pacific Forum CSIS Honolulu, Hawaii PacNetNumber 59 July 18, 2016 The curious case of Okinotori: reef, rock, or island? by a reef, which is defined as a ridge of rock, sand, or coral, the June Teufel Dreyer top of which lies close to the surface of the sea. By contrast, an island is a naturally formed area of land surrounded by water Dr. June Teufel Dreyer ([email protected]) is professor of that stays above water at high tide, and which can sustain Political Science at the University of Miami and author of human habitation. According to Article 121 (3) of the United “Middle Kingdom and Empire of the Rising Sun: Sino- Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), Japanese Relations Past and Present,” Oxford University entities that are above water at high tide but cannot sustain Press 2016. human habitation or economic life of their own are not The July 12 ruling of the Permanent Court of Arbitration considered islands but rocks, and are not entitled to an EEZ. (PCA) in The Hague in favor of the Philippines’ case against The British did not claim Douglass Reef, and the next China’s claim to sovereignty over large portions of the South known visits were from a Japanese ship, the Manshu, in 1921 China Sea created ripple effects that went far beyond the area and 1925. After ascertaining that no other claimants to the area involved. In denying that many of the entities claimed by the existed, the Japanese government in 1931 declared sovereignty People’s Republic of China (PRC) were islands, which would over what it called Okinotorishima, placing it under the entitle them to exclusive economic zones (EEZs) of 200 jurisdiction of Tokyo municipality, along with the rest of the nautical miles from their base lines, but rocks, which are Ogasawaras.
    [Show full text]
  • The US-Japan-China Mistrust Spiral and Okinotorishima
    Volume 5 | Issue 10 | Article ID 2541 | Oct 01, 2007 The Asia-Pacific Journal | Japan Focus The US-Japan-China Mistrust Spiral and Okinotorishima Yukie YOSHIKAWA The US-Japan-China Mistrust Spiral and by defining the unmanned rocks as islands, Okinotorishima thereby obtaining an EEZ. In denying the Japanese EEZ claim in the area, China lays Yukie YOSHIKAWA claim to the right to freely investigate the seabed in the surrounding area. Chinese The southernmost island of the Japanese concerns also center on the right to conduct archipelago has been a source of contention submarine operations in the event of military between Japan and China since 2004, when conflict involving Taiwan. Chinese officials started to refer to it as “rocks” not as an “island.” In international law, rocks The underlying theme is the mutual mistrust cannot be a basis for claiming an Exclusive illustrated by the Okinotorishima squabble. Economic Zone (EEZ). After the Chinese Ultimately, Japan will have to address China’s challenge to its territorial right overunderlying concerns, especially regarding Okinotorishima, Japanese officials reacted Taiwan, which is the key to solving the vigorously, notably Tokyo Governor Ishihara Okinotorishima issue, which is merely the tip of Shintaro, within whose jurisdictionthe iceberg of Sino-Japanese relations. Okinotorishima falls. Ishihara ordered installation of a 330 million yen radar system I. Historical Background for surveillance and set up an address plate at the “island.” The two countries continue to The first record of Okinotorishima dates back dispute the issue. to 1789 when the English ship Iphigenia found the territory. The territory was named “Douglass Reef” the following year.
    [Show full text]
  • Disputes Over the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands: Communication Tactics and Grand Strategies Chin-Chung Chao University of Nebraska at Omaha, [email protected]
    University of Nebraska at Omaha DigitalCommons@UNO Communication Faculty Publications School of Communication 6-2014 Disputes over the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands: Communication Tactics and Grand Strategies Chin-Chung Chao University of Nebraska at Omaha, [email protected] Dexin Tian Savannah College of Art and Design, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/commfacpub Part of the Communication Commons Recommended Citation Chao, Chin-Chung and Tian, Dexin, "Disputes over the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands: Communication Tactics and Grand Strategies" (2014). Communication Faculty Publications. 85. https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/commfacpub/85 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Communication at DigitalCommons@UNO. It has been accepted for inclusion in Communication Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Journal of International Relations and Foreign Policy June 2014, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 19-47 ISSN: 2333-5866 (Print), 2333-5874 (Online) Copyright © The Author(s). 2014. All Rights Reserved. Published by American Research Institute for Policy Development Disputes over the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands: Communication Tactics and Grand Strategies Chin-Chung Chao1 and Dexin Tian2 Abstract This study explores the communication tactics and grand strategies of each of the involved parties in the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands disputes. Under the theoretical balance between liberal
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Developments in Japan-China Relations - Basic Facts on the Senkaku Islands and the Recent Incident
    Recent Developments in Japan-China Relations - Basic Facts on the Senkaku Islands and the Recent Incident - Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan October 2010 1 Senkaku Islands ◦ Location ◦ The Basic Facts of the Senkaku Islands Obstruction of the execution of official duty by a Chinese fishing trawler (September 7, 2010) Recent Developments in Japan-China Relations Japan’s Position (Statement by MOFA Press Secretary on September 25 2010) 2 China 330km Uotsuri-Shima Okinawa 170km 410km Japan 170km Taiwan Ishigaki-Shima East China Sea Main island of Okinawa Ishigaki-Shima Kuba-Shima Taisho-To About 27km About Uotsuri-Shima 110km Kitako-Shima About 5km Minamiko-Shima ◦ From 1885 on, the Senkaku Islands had been thoroughly surveyed by the Government of Japan through the agencies of Okinawa Prefecture and by way of other methods. Through these surveys, it was confirmed that the Senkaku Islands had been uninhabited and showed no trace of having been under the control of China. Based on this confirmation, the Government of Japan made a Cabinet Decision on 14 January 1895 to erect a marker on the Islands to formally incorporate the Senkaku Islands into the territory of Japan. ◦ Since then, the Senkaku Islands have continuously remained as an integral part of the Nansei Shoto Islands which are the territory of Japan. These islands were neither part of Taiwan nor part of the Pescadores Islands which were ceded to Japan from the Qing Dynasty of China in accordance with Article II of the Treaty of Shimonoseki which came into effect in May of 1895. ◦ Accordingly, the Senkaku Islands are not included in the territory which Japan renounced under Article II of the San Francisco Peace Treaty.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Dokdo
    Resolution of Territorial Disputes in East Asia: The Case of Dokdo Laurent Mayali & John Yoo* This Article seeks to contribute to solving of the Korea-Japan territorial dispute over Dokdo island (Korea)/Takeshima (Japanese). The Republic of Korea argues that Dokdo has formed a part of Korea since as early as 512 C.E.; as Korea currently exercises control over the island, its claim to discovery would appear to fulfill the legal test for possession of territory. Conversely, the Japanese government claims that Korea never exercised sufficient sovereignty over Dokdo. Japan claims that the island remained terra nullius—in other words, territory not possessed by any nation and so could be claimed—until it annexed Dokdo in 1905. Japan also claims that in the 1951 peace treaty ending World War II, the Allies did not include Dokdo in the list of islands taken from Japan, which implies that Japan retained the island in the postwar settlement. This article makes three contributions. First, it brings forward evidence from the maps held at various archives in the United States and Western Europe to determine the historical opinions of experts and governments about the possession of Dokdo. Second, it clarifies the factors that have guided international tribunals in their resolution of earlier disputes involving islands and maritime territory. Third, it shows how the claim of terra nullius has little legitimate authority when applied to East Asia, an area where empires, kingdoms, and nation-states had long exercised control over territory. * Laurent Mayali is the Lloyd M. Robbins Professor of Law, University of California at Berkeley School of Law; John Yoo is the Emanuel S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Arbitral Court's Ruling on the South China
    The Arbitral Court’s Ruling on the South China Sea: Pro and Cons, Contexts and Consequences Yann-huei Song APARC, Stanford University Philippines Conference Room, Encina Hall, 3rd Floor October 6, 2016, 12:00 – 1:30 The SCS Arbitra-on Case The Republic of the Philippines v. The People’s Republic of China PCA Case No. 2013-19 The SCS – A semi-enclosed sea South China sea 9-dash line Viet- Philippine namese Claimed Claimed 200-nm 200-nm EEZ limit EEZ limit Philippine archipelagic straight baselines 9-dash line ROCK LTE ROCK ROCK LTE ROCK LTE The Nature of the South China Sea Arbitra-on Case • A Legal warfare? • A Trial of the Century? • A poli6cal farce? • An arbitraon under the disguise of law? • A piece of trash paper? • A possible diplomac “shame-fare”? • Increasing “reputaon costs” for China? • A “game changer”? Timeline: The SCS Arbitra-on Case • 6/16/2015 PRC passed deadline to submit any final statements in response to the Philippines’ Supplemental WriFen Submission ; • 7/07-13/2015 First Oral Hearing on Jurisdic6on and Admissibility • 10/29/2015 Award on Jurisdic6on & Admissibility issued ; • 10/30/2015 PRC’s reac6on to the Award • 10/31/2015 Taiwan’s reac6on to the Award • 11/24-26 and • 11/30/2015 Hearings on pending jurisdic6onal issues and Merits • 12/2015 – 6/2016 A series of “preemp6ve” or “defensive” ac6ons taken by the PRC • 12/2015- 6/2016 Also a series of “defensive” ac6ons taken by Taiwan, in par6cular, re. the status of Itu Aba (Taiping Island) • 7/12/2016 The Award was issued (501 pages) Core Submissions and Key Rulings • The historic rights, or other sovereign rights, or jurisdicon claimed by China in the waters encircled by the “9-dash line” in the SCS are contrary to the UNCLOS and without lawful effect.
    [Show full text]
  • The Significance of the Diaoyutai/Senkaku Islands Dispute for Taiwan
    Sovereignty or Identity? The Significance of the Diaoyutai/Senkaku Islands Dispute for Taiwan Boyu CHEN* Abstract Introduction Narratives of the Diaoyutai/Senkaku Islands Where does Taiwan fit in the dispute expose the spectrum of Taiwan’s national Diaoyutai/Senkaku Islands dispute? identity. While Taiwan has long been struggling to legitimise its claim of representing China or Officially, Taiwan’s government could to become an independent state, some of the also make claims on the islands. Taiwanese people still welcome their former But historically, Taiwan has had and colonial master, Japan. This paper draws on continues to have intimate relations with academic and journalistic work on how Taiwan both China and Japan. Former Ming has responded to the islands dispute. The author also turns to the internet to examine popular Dynasty officials and scholars escaped to sentiments in the region by examining netizens’ Taiwan in the 17th century to seek refuge discourse on the islands from Taiwan’s largest from the newly installed, Manchu- bulletin board system (BBS), Station-PTT. run Qing Dynasty. After the Second This survey finds that the sovereignty dispute World War, the Nationalist government surfaces issues of national identity. under Chiang Kai-shek fostered an anti-Communist ideology and Chinese Key Words identity, reinforced by US dominance militarily, politically, economically and Diaoyutai/Senkaku Islands, China, Taiwan, Japan, National Identity. culturally. At the same time, Taiwan also shares an intimate history with Japan. Colonised by the latter between 1895-1945, Taiwan’s elderly still wax * Boyu Chen is Assistant Professor at the Gradu- nostalgically about Japan while the ate Institute of Political Science, National Sun younger generation swarms to Japanese Yat-sen University, Taiwan.
    [Show full text]
  • CSR90 the United States, China, and Taiwan
    Council Special Report No. 90 February 2021 The United States, Cover photo: A red pin indicates Taiwan on a map of East Asia. (hyotographics/Shutterstock) China, and Taiwan: Council on Foreign Relations cfr.org A Strategy to Prevent War 58 East 68th Street 1777 F Street, NW New York, NY 10065 Washington, DC 20006 tel 212.434.9400 tel 202.509.8400 Robert D. Blackwill and Philip Zelikow Council Special Report No. 90 February 2021 The United States, China, and Taiwan: A Strategy to Prevent War Robert D. Blackwill and Philip Zelikow The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher dedicated to being a resource for its members, government officials, business executives, journalists, educators and students, civic and religious leaders, and other interested citizens in order to help them better understand the world and the foreign policy choices facing the United States and other countries. Founded in 1921, CFR carries out its mission by maintaining a diverse membership, with special programs to promote interest and develop expertise in the next generation of foreign policy leaders; convening meetings at its headquarters in New York and in Washington, DC, and other cities where senior government officials, members of Congress, global leaders, and prominent thinkers come together with Council members to discuss and debate major international issues; supporting a Studies Program that fosters independent research, enabling CFR scholars to produce articles, reports, and books and hold roundtables that analyze foreign policy issues and make concrete policy recommendations; publishing Foreign Affairs, the preeminent journal on international affairs and U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Senkakus (Diaoyu/Diaoyutai) Dispute: U.S. Treaty Obligations
    The Senkakus (Diaoyu/Diaoyutai) Dispute: U.S. Treaty Obligations Updated March 1, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R42761 The Senkakus (Diaoyu/Diaoyutai) Dispute: U.S. Treaty Obligations Summary Since 2012, tensions have increased between Japan and China over the disputed Senkaku islands in the East China Sea. These flare-ups run the risk of involving the United States in an armed conflict in the region. Each time a crisis has erupted over the Senkakus over the past decade, questions have arisen concerning the U.S. relationship to the islands. Japan administers the eight small, uninhabited features, the largest of which is roughly 1.5 square miles. Some geologists believe the features sit near significant oil and natural gas deposits. China, as well as Taiwan, contests Japanese claims of sovereignty over the islands, which Japan calls the Senkaku-shoto, China calls the Diaoyu Dao, and Taiwan calls the Diaoyutai Lieyu. Although the disputed territory commonly is referred to as “islands,” it is unclear if any of the features would meet the definition of “island” under international law. U.S. Administrations going back at least to the Nixon Administration have stated that the United States takes no position on the question of who has sovereignty over the Senkakus. It also has been U.S. policy since 1972, however, that the 1960 U.S.-Japan Security Treaty covers the islands. Article 5 of the treaty states that the United States is committed to “meet the common danger” of an armed attack on “the territories under the Administration of Japan.” In return for U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Maritime Issues in the East and South China Seas
    Maritime Issues in the East and South China Seas Summary of a Conference Held January 12–13, 2016 Volume Editors: Rafiq Dossani, Scott Warren Harold Contributing Authors: Michael S. Chase, Chun-i Chen, Tetsuo Kotani, Cheng-yi Lin, Chunhao Lou, Mira Rapp-Hooper, Yann-huei Song, Joanna Yu Taylor C O R P O R A T I O N For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/CF358 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2016 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover image: Detailed look at Eastern China and Taiwan (Anton Balazh/Fotolia). Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface Disputes over land features and maritime zones in the East China Sea and South China Sea have been growing in prominence over the past decade and could lead to serious conflict among the claimant countries.
    [Show full text]
  • US-China Strategic Competition in South and East China Seas
    U.S.-China Strategic Competition in South and East China Seas: Background and Issues for Congress Updated September 8, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R42784 U.S.-China Strategic Competition in South and East China Seas Summary Over the past several years, the South China Sea (SCS) has emerged as an arena of U.S.-China strategic competition. China’s actions in the SCS—including extensive island-building and base- construction activities at sites that it occupies in the Spratly Islands, as well as actions by its maritime forces to assert China’s claims against competing claims by regional neighbors such as the Philippines and Vietnam—have heightened concerns among U.S. observers that China is gaining effective control of the SCS, an area of strategic, political, and economic importance to the United States and its allies and partners. Actions by China’s maritime forces at the Japan- administered Senkaku Islands in the East China Sea (ECS) are another concern for U.S. observers. Chinese domination of China’s near-seas region—meaning the SCS and ECS, along with the Yellow Sea—could substantially affect U.S. strategic, political, and economic interests in the Indo-Pacific region and elsewhere. Potential general U.S. goals for U.S.-China strategic competition in the SCS and ECS include but are not necessarily limited to the following: fulfilling U.S. security commitments in the Western Pacific, including treaty commitments to Japan and the Philippines; maintaining and enhancing the U.S.-led security architecture in the Western Pacific, including U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Growing an Island: Okinotori
    GrowinG an island: okinotori dirk de Meyer The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) 1 defines an island as “a naturally formed area of land, surrounded United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1 by water, which is above water at high tide”. However, according to (UNCLOS), 10 December this international law, not every 20°25’0.00"N, kind of 136° island 5’0.00"E engenders the same 1982, Part VIII, art. 121(1); reprinted in “United Nations, legal effects, for “Rocks which cannot sustain human habitation or Official Text of the United economic life of their own shall have no exclusive economic zone.”2 Nations Convention on the The primary purpose of this paragraph was to ensure that insignificant Law of Sea with Annexes and Index”, UN Sales No. E.83.V.5 geological features, particularly those far from areas claimed by other (1983). The law entered into states, could not generate broad zones of national jurisdiction in the force 16 November 1994. middle of the ocean. Otherwise, the smallest rock would be capable of 2 suddenly generating an enormous exclusive economic zone, a circular Ibid., Part VIII, art. 121(3). area with a radius of 200 nautical miles or 370 kilometres, i.e. an area of roughly two thirds the size of France. 20˚25’0.00”N, 136˚5’0.00”E – 23 In fact, there have been few circumstances in which rocks have given rise to such claims. Most often, these have been located in coastal areas subject to conflicting state claims.
    [Show full text]