DOCSLIB.ORG

No. 10-1973 in the UNITED STATES COURT of APPEALS for THE

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
No. 10-1973 in the UNITED STATES COURT of APPEALS for THE No. 10-1973 iN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION, INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, V. BARACK OBAMA, et al., Defendants-Appellants. ON APPEAL FROM TIlE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN SEPARATE APPENI)IX OF PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES RICHARD L. BOLTON Boardman, Suhr, Curry & Field LLP One S. Pinckney Street, Suite 410 P. 0. Box 927 Madison, WI 53701-0927 (608) 257-9521 Attorneysfor Flaintiffs-Appellees ____ TABLE OF CONTENTS Document District Court Opinion And Order, filed March 2, 2010 (entered March 1,2010) [Dkt. # 131] 1 Second Opinion And Order, filed April 15, 2010 {Dkt. # 132] 50 Plaintiffs’ Proposed Findings of Fact, filed on December 11, 2009 {Dkt.# 107] 116 Decoration Day Order, dated May 5, 1868 180 Decoration Day Address by President Harrison, dated May 30, 1891 .181 Memorial Day Address by President Wilson, dated May 30, 1914 183 Memorial Day Address by President Coolidge, dated May 30, 1927 185 Memorial Day Address by President Hoover, dated May 30, 1929 189 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION, INC., ANNE NICOL GAYLOR, ANNIE LAURIE GAYLOR, DAN BARKER, PAUL GAYLOR, PHYLLIS ROSE and JILL DEAN, OPINION and ORDER Plaintiffs, 08-cv-5 8 8-bbc V. President BARACK OBAMA, White House Press Secretary ROBERT L. GIBBS and SHIRLEY DOBSON, Chairman of the National Day of Prayer Task Force, Defendants. Under 36 U.S.C. § 119, the first Thursday of every May in the United States is designated as the “National Day of Prayer.” The statute directs the President to issue a proclamation to commemorate the day, which President Barack Obama has done, following the precedent of many former Presidents. Defendant Shirley Dobson is the chairperson of the National Day of Prayer Task Force, which is a private organization that sponsors events celebrating the day. Plaintiff Freedom from Religion Foundation is an organization of nonreligious SA 0001 persons who object to what they view as the government’s endorsement and encouragement of prayer. In this case brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the foundation and several of its members are challenging the constitutionality of § 119 under the establishment clause. They seek an injunction prohibiting its enforcement. In addition, they want an order prohibiting the President from issuing “prayer proclamations” generally and prohibiting defendant Dobson from acting in concert with public officials in any way that would violate the establishment clause. The parties’ cross motions for summary judgment are now before the court. Dkt. ## 79, 82 and 103.1 The threshold issue is standing. This requires the plaintiffs to show that they have suffered a “concrete” injury that is caused by each of the challenged actions and can be remedied through the relief they seek. “The concept of a ‘concrete’ injury is particularly elusive in the Establishment Clause context. because [that clause] is primarily aimed at protecting non-economic interests of a spiritual, as opposed to a physical or pecuniary, nature.” Vasquez v. Los Angeles (“LA”) County, 487 F.3d 1246, 1250 (9th Cir. 2007). Although the answer is not free from doubt, I conclude that, under the unique circumstances of this case, plaintiffs have standing to challenge the constitutionality of the Plaintiffs did not file a separate document entitled a “motion” for summary judgment, only a brief in support of judgment in their favor. However, the parties have agreed that no trial is necessary and that the court may decide the case for either side on the current record. Dkt. #100. 2 SA 0002 National Day of Prayer statute. The primary injury plaintiffs allege is the feeling of unwelcomeness and exclusion they experience as nonreligious persons because of what they view as a message from the government that it favors Americans who pray. That injury is intangible, but it is no less concrete than the injuries in the many cases in which courts have recognized the standing of persons subjected to unwelcome religious speech. The only difference between those cases and this one is that plaintiffs have not come into physical or visual contact with a religious display. However, that difference has little significance in a case like this one involving a national message intended to reach all Americans. Although plaintiffs do not have to “pass by” the National Day of Prayer, they are confronted with the government’s message and affected by it just as strongly as someone who views a religious monument or sits through a “moment of silence,” if not more so. To find standing in those cases while denying it in this one would be an exercise in formalism. With respect to plaintiffs’ challenge to “prayer proclamations” issued by the President (other than one required by § 119), none of the plaintiffs has read or heard such a proclamation except when they expressly sought one out. Such a self-inflicted “injury” cannot establish standing. With respect to defendant Dobson, plaintiffs have failed completely to show that any of her actions has injured them. Accordingly, I will deny defendants’ motions for summary judgment and grant plaintiffs’ motion with respect to the question of standing on plaintiffs’ claim that the 3 SA0003 National Day of Prayer statute violates the establishment clause. I will grant defendants’ motions and deny plaintiffs’ on the question whether plaintiff has standing to challenge the constitutionality of presidential prayer proclamations and any actions of defendant Dobson. I will address the merits of plaintiffs’ challenge to § 119 in a separate opinion. From the parties’ proposed findings of fact and the record, I find that the following facts are undisputed. UNDISPUTED FACTS In 1952, Congress enacted a statute establishing the National Day of Prayer. In 1988, Congress amended the statute so that it specified the day of the year the National Day of Prayer would take place. Under the current version of the statute, “[t]he President shall issue each year a proclamation designating the first Thursday in May as a National Day of Prayer on which the people of the United States may turn to God in prayer and meditation at churches, in groups, and as individuals.” 36 U.S.C. § 119. Most presidents since 1952, including President Barack Obama and former President George W. Bush, have complied with this statute, issuing proclamations through their press secretaries. Plaintiff Freedom from Religion Foundation is an organization founded in 1976 in Madison, Wisconsin and devoted.to “promot[ing] the constitutional principle of separation of church and state” and “educat[ingj the public on matters of nontheism.” It publishes the 4 SA 0004 newspaper Freethought Today, which reports on government conduct the foundation opposes as well as the views and activities of its members. Over the years, the foundation has responded to the National Day of Prayer in various ways, including by promoting secular proclamations for public officials to make, contacting public officials about their involvement and encouraging and publicizing efforts to protest the government involvement with the day. The foundation devotes staff time and resources to oppose the National Day of Prayer. Members of the foundation attend events related to the National Day of Prayer in order to monitor or protest them. At least 1500 members have read or seen media coverage of the National Day of Prayer and the presidential proclamations accompanying it. Plaintiff Annie Laurie Gaylor is a co-founder of the foundation and is now its co president. She “regularly reports” on the National Day of Prayer, writes press releases and letters of complaint about it and urges members to protest events celebrating the day. The complaints she receives from members about the National Day of Prayer have led her to believe that it creates much controversy and division. She “learned about” the 2008 proclamation from former President Bush by visiting the website of the National Day of Prayer Task Force, which she has “routinely monitored in the spring for many years.” She corroborated the information she received using the “White House website.” In 2009, she monitored both websites in advance of the proclamation. She learned that President Obama would be issuing a proclamation from “numerous prominent national news stories in the 5 SA 0005 Washington Post and over the wire.” She “verified the wording” of the 2009 proclamation on the White House website. She “needed to see what [the President] was going to be saying because [she was] suing for it.” Plaintiff Annie Laurie Gaylor “does not believe in a god” and she does not believe in the efficacy of prayer. Members of the foundation share Gaylor’s views. On the National Day of Prayer, she believes that the government is encouraging her to pray. She and other foundation members feel “excluded, disenfranchised, affronted, offended and deeply insulted.” Dan Barker is the co-president of the foundation. He “remembers seeing or hearing something on television (probably a news story) in the early 1 980s when President Ronald Regan signed one of the NDP proclamations.” He has been “watching” the National Day of Prayer “for years” and has “opposed” it publicly in writing. In early 2008, Barker read President Bush’s National Day of Prayer proclamation after searching for it on the internet. The proclamation stated that America trusts in the abiding power of prayer and asks for the wisdom to discern God’s will in times of joy and trial. As we observe the National Day of Prayer, we recognize our dependence on the Almighty, we thank him for the many blessings He has bestowed upon us, and we put our country’s future in His hands. .[J] ask the citizens of our nation to give thanks .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • HUMANISM Religious Practices
    HUMANISM Religious Practices . Required Daily Observances . Required Weekly Observances . Required Occasional Observances/Holy Days Religious Items . Personal Religious Items . Congregate Religious Items . Searches Requirements for Membership . Requirements (Includes Rites of Conversion) . Total Membership Medical Prohibitions Dietary Standards Burial Rituals . Death . Autopsies . Mourning Practices Sacred Writings Organizational Structure . Headquarters Location . Contact Office/Person History Theology 1 Religious Practices Required Daily Observance No required daily observances. Required Weekly Observance No required weekly observances, but many Humanists find fulfillment in congregating with other Humanists on a weekly basis (especially those who characterize themselves as Religious Humanists) or other regular basis for social and intellectual engagement, discussions, book talks, lectures, and similar activities. Required Occasional Observances No required occasional observances, but some Humanists (especially those who characterize themselves as Religious Humanists) celebrate life-cycle events with baby naming, coming of age, and marriage ceremonies as well as memorial services. Even though there are no required observances, there are several days throughout the calendar year that many Humanists consider holidays. They include (but are not limited to) the following: February 12. Darwin Day: This marks the birthday of Charles Darwin, whose research and findings in the field of biology, particularly his theory of evolution by natural selection, represent a breakthrough in human knowledge that Humanists celebrate. First Thursday in May. National Day of Reason: This day acknowledges the importance of reason, as opposed to blind faith, as the best method for determining valid conclusions. June 21 - Summer Solstice. This day is also known as World Humanist Day and is a celebration of the longest day of the year.
    [Show full text]
  • Holidays and Observances, 2020
    Holidays and Observances, 2020 For Use By New Jersey Libraries Made by Allison Massey and Jeff Cupo Table of Contents A Note on the Compilation…………………………………………………………………….2 Calendar, Chronological……………….…………………………………………………..…..6 Calendar, By Group…………………………………………………………………………...17 Ancestries……………………………………………………....……………………..17 Religion……………………………………………………………………………….19 Socio-economic……………………………………………………………………….21 Library……………………………………...…………………………………….…...22 Sources………………………………………………………………………………....……..24 1 A Note on the Compilation This listing of holidays and observances is intended to represent New Jersey’s diverse population, yet not have so much information that it’s unwieldy. It needed to be inclusive, yet practical. As such, determinations needed to be made on whose holidays and observances were put on the calendar, and whose were not. With regards to people’s ancestry, groups that made up 0.85% of the New Jersey population (approximately 75,000 people) and higher, according to Census data, were chosen. Ultimately, the cut-off needed to be made somewhere, and while a round 1.0% seemed a good fit at first, there were too many ancestries with slightly less than that. 0.85% was significantly higher than any of the next population percentages, and so it made a satisfactory threshold. There are 20 ancestries with populations above 75,000, and in total they make up 58.6% of the New Jersey population. In terms of New Jersey’s religious landscape, the population is 67% Christian, 18% Unaffiliated (“Nones”), and 12% Jewish, Muslim, Buddhist, and Hindu. These six religious affiliations, which add up to 97% of the NJ population, were chosen for the calendar. 2% of the state is made up of other religions and faiths, but good data on those is lacking.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting Ideas
    The MAAF Network Selected Meeting Ideas Version 20120417 This document provides some initial meeting ideas. Running a group involves leadership, succession planning, finance, scheduling, logistics, and other considerations that are important but not covered here. Consider requesting a group running guide from the Secular Student Alliance and/or the American Humanist Association. Also look at other organizations listed on the MAAF network page for great ideas or coaching. Below are listed several types of meetings to consider putting on the schedule. For each meeting, take 5‐10 minutes to introduce the group, recognize new members, and ask for input from the group (feedback on events, new ideas, personal news). Service Project: Clean a road, plant a garden, build a house, hand out food… Service projects are by far the most positive and impactful activities for a local group. It can be fun and rewarding, and charitable work does great things to eradicate negative perceptions of atheists. Book Club: This involves 1‐3 members who are familiar with a certain book presenting the main concepts and a few questions. The other members ask questions about the book and discuss key concepts. Note that it is important that members not feel obligated to read the book. This allows the group to learn and limits loss of participation due to busy schedules. Current events: Have individuals bring in news clippings to discuss among the group. It's best to pick a topic – ethics, atheism, cosmology, medicine, etc – just focus the discussion. Also see MAAF's Atheists in Foxholes news and events calendar (under 'community' on the site).
    [Show full text]
  • Hard Cor News Vol. 1 #2
    Volume 1, Issue 5 ~ May 15, 2010 New Billboard Design Now Available Because Internet discussion has revealed that some people are getting tired of the billboard image using the blue sky and fluffy white clouds, which has been in use since January 2008, the UnitedCoR board of directors has now approved a fresh new graphic design. It is in direct response to online suggestions that a sunrise or sunset might look good. This new design can be used either with the slogan below or with ―Are you good without God? Millions are.‖ Effective immediately, therefore, local CoRs now have this or the blue-sky design available as options. And, of course, the local CoR URL will be placed where it says ―UnitedCoR.org.‖ (Special thanks to Lisa Zangerl of the American Humanist Association for the graphic design.) Despite, however, these calls by some to replace the blue-sky design, the original remains popular with other people. For example, the following message was received via Detroit CoR from Murray Suters in Sydney, Australia. I read with interest your bus campaign. Unfortunately our transport system has a neutral advertising policy. No church ads but also no secular adds either. In Australia we are currently fighting a federal government decision to federally fund the allocation of chaplains into all public schools. I was thinking that a way of fundraising was to print up a number of bumper stickers and sell them to my fellow atheists. I then saw you ads on the sides of the buses. 1 I would like your permission to use your artwork.
    [Show full text]
  • View Issue As
    national lawyers guild Volume 68 Number 4 Winter 2011 Turn to the Constitution in 193 Prayer: Freedom from Religion Foundation v. Obama, the Constitutionality and the Politics of the National Day of Prayer Gail Schnitzer Eisenberg Anatomy of a “Terrorism” 234 Prosecution: Dr. Rafil Dhafir and the Help the Needy Muslim Charity Case Katherine Hughes The National Defense 247 Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012: Battlefield Earth Nathan Goetting editor’s preface On April 17, 1952, with the U.S. nearly two years into the bloody “police action” against the “Godless Communists” in Korea and Tailgunner Joe McCarthy at the height of his foaming and fulminating power in the Sen- ate, President Truman signed into law a bill requiring presidents to exhort Americans to do the one thing the First Amendment seems most emphatic the federal government should never ask citizens to do—pray. The law establish- ing the National Day of Prayer was the result of a mass effort of evangelical Christians, such as Billy Graham, who rallied support for it during one of his “crusades,” to use the organs of government and the bully pulpit of the presidency to aid them in their effort to further Christianize the nation. After a push by the doddering Senator Strom Thurmond from South Carolina, who for decades expressed a uniquely southern zeal for God matched only by his uniquely southern zeal for racial segregation, the law was amended in 1988 so that the National Day of Prayer would be fixed on the first Thursday of every May. It has since become a jealously guarded and zealously promoted evangelical holiday of the politically active Christian right, who use it to perpetuate the false and self-serving narrative that a nation whose founding documents were drafted largely by Enlightenment-era skeptics and deists was actually designed by a council of holy men to be an Augustinian City of God.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    Annual Report Humanism is a progressive philosophy of life that, without theism or other supernatural beliefs, affirms our ability and responsibility to lead ethical lives of personal fulfillment that aspire to the greater good of humanity. The mission of the American Humanist Association (AHA) is to advance humanism, an ethical and life-affirming philosophy free of belief in any gods and other supernatural forces. Advocating for equality for nontheists and a society guided by reason, empathy, and our growing knowledge of the world, the AHA promotes a worldview that encourages individuals to live informed and meaningful lives that aspire to the greater good. Board of Directors AS OF JANUARY 1, 2020 Sunil Panikkath Jennifer Christine John Hooper Robert Boston Rebecca Hale Howard Katz President Kalmanson Shellska Treasurer Vice President Secretary Monica R. Miller Juhem Ellen Sutliff Mandisa Thomas Sharon Welch Michael Werner Roy Speckhardt Navarro-Rivera Executive Director President’s Message This is my first President’s Message But the last year was also a very the degradation of ethical standards and comes at the end of my first year difficult one for us humanists who in our public life continues or whether leading the AHA. While a nonbeliever take seriously our tagline about being our republic takes a turn away from this my entire adult life, I have identified good. Our republic saw the continued path. Needless to say, one’s individual as a humanist for at least twenty years and intensified degradation of ethical view on this will have no influence on and have been heavily involved with behavior in the public sphere.
    [Show full text]
  • Holiday Calendar 2021 Rough Draft
    Holidays and Observances, 2021 For Use By New Jersey Libraries Made by Allison Massey and Jeff Cupo Table of Contents A Note on the Compilation…………………………………………………………………….2 Calendar, Chronological……………….…………………………………………………..…..6 Calendar, By Group…………………………………………………………………………...16 Ancestries……………………………………………………....……………………..16 Religion……………………………………………………………………………….18 Socio-economic……………………………………………………………………….20 Library……………………………………...…………………………………….…...21 Sources………………………………………………………………………………....……..22 1 A Note on the Compilation This listing of holidays and observances is intended to represent New Jersey’s diverse population, yet not have so much information that it’s unwieldy. It needed to be inclusive, yet practical. As such, determinations needed to be made on whose holidays and observances were put on the calendar, and whose were not. With regards to people’s ancestry, groups that made up 0.85% of the New Jersey population (approximately 75,000 people) and higher, according to Census data, were chosen. Ultimately, the cut-off needed to be made somewhere, and while a round 1.0% seemed a good fit at first, there were too many ancestries with slightly less than that. 0.85% was significantly higher than any of the next population percentages, and so it made a satisfactory threshold. There are 20 ancestries with populations above 75,000, and in total they make up 58.6% of the New Jersey population. In terms of New Jersey’s religious landscape, the population is 67% Christian, 18% Unaffiliated (“Nones”), and 12% Jewish, Muslim, Buddhist, and Hindu. These six religious affiliations, which add up to 97% of the NJ population, were chosen for the calendar. 2% of the state is made up of other religions and faiths, but good data on those is lacking.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-83113-0 — Secular Surge David E
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-83113-0 — Secular Surge David E. Campbell , Geoffrey C. Layman , John C. Green Index More Information Index accommodationists, 49, 52 aversion to, 182, 183–184, 186, 187 and Republicans, 49 defined, 5 activists discrimination against, 186 and partisan cleavage, 141, 142–146, 147, 148 partisan gap toward, 187–188 political styles, 159 as political candidates, 184, 186, See also and religious identification, 141, 145 Secular Candidate Experiment role in political parties, 16, 140–141, 167 relationship to Nones, 7 Addington, Aislinn, 219 “Atheists Don’t Have No Songs,” (Martin), 71 addition secularity, 9, 209, 221, 222 authoritarianism, 89, 90, 94 AHA. See American Humanist Association (AHA) backlash hypothesis. See politicized religion, America as a religious nation, 10, 183 backlash America as a secular nation, 11–13, 17, 24 Baker, Joseph, 15, 25 American Atheists, 1, 2, 3, 9, 211 Barr, William, 138 American Ethical Union, 9 Bawn, Kathleen, 140 American Humanist Association (AHA), 3, Beinart, Peter, 139, 155 13–14, 16, 29, 30, 47, 91, 211, 216, 220 Bellah, Robert, 50 American Humanist Association Survey Biden, Joe, 165 (2018), 17, 27, 31, 35–37 Bolling, Ken, 69 membership demographics, 30 bonding social capital, and civic engagement, American National Election Studies (ANES), 72–73 23, 98, 172–173 Booker, Cory, 139, 152 “American Preservationists,” 172, 175 Boyle, Kevin, 138 American Secularists, demographics, 22 Brady, Henry, 71 American Values Atlas, 23 Breyer, Stephen, 47 Americans United for the Separation
    [Show full text]
  • 1 in the United States District Court for the Middle
    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Orlando Division DAVID WILLIAMSON, CHASE HANSEL, KEITH BECHER, RONALD GORDON, JEFFERY KOEBERL, CENTRAL FLORIDA FREETHOUGHT COMMUNITY, SPACE COAST FREETHOUGHT ASSOCIATION, and HUMANIST COMMUNITY OF THE SPACE COAST, Plaintiffs, Case No. ___________________ v. BREVARD COUNTY, Defendant. COMPLAINT (Injunctive Relief Sought) Introduction 1. In Town of Greece v. Galloway, 134 S. Ct. 1811 (2014), the U.S. Supreme Court held that local governmental bodies may open their meetings with invocations that typically have theistic content. But the Court also ruled that local governments must “maintain[ ] a policy of nondiscrimination” in deciding who may present invocations, and that the relevant policies or practices must not “reflect an aversion or bias . against minority faiths.” Id. at 1824. Thus, in upholding the invocation practice of the town at issue, the Court emphasized that the town’s “leaders maintained that a minister or layperson of any persuasion, including an atheist, could give the invocation.” Id. at 1816. 2. After the Supreme Court’s decision, numerous local governmental bodies in Florida and elsewhere in America allowed nontheists — atheists, agnostics, Secular Humanists, and others who do not believe in a theistic God — to give opening invocations at governmental 1 meetings. Yet defendant Brevard County (“the County”) has repeatedly rejected and ignored requests from atheists and Humanists to give opening invocations at meetings of its Board of County Commissioners (“the Board”). The County has adopted a policy of permitting only people who hold theistic religious beliefs to give the invocations. 3. The plaintiffs are atheist, Humanist, and other nontheist individuals and organizations who seek the opportunity to give opening invocations before the Board.
    [Show full text]
  • MAY Marketing Calendar
    1 Published by WUN Publications, Inc. This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information regarding the subject matter covered at the time of publication. It is distributed with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other professional service. The authors and WUN Publications, Inc. shall assume no liability or responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to be caused, directly or indirectly by the information contained in this eBook. Every effort has been made to make this eBook as accurate as possible. However, there may be mistakes, both typographical and in content, which have not been verified. In addition, due to differences among user interfaces (browsers), cross-platform conversion processes can in some cases modify the representation of the information contained herein. This text should be used only as a general guide. The Internet changes as the “speed of light” which can render certain information to become obsolete or irrelevant. The purpose of this eBook is to educate and entertain. In some cases I found conflicting dates for the same holiday and therefore used my best judgment based upon what other sources cited the same day. In addition, where a product or service has been recommended, the author may receive a commission if you purchase it. The author has made these recommendations based upon her own experiences and therefore have made these available to the readers of the 2012 QUIRKY MARKETING CALENDAR based upon that experience. Permission is hereby granted to email, advertise and pass small excerpts of this eBook along to anyone as long as no changes or edits to its content are made.
    [Show full text]
  • Skeptical Spiritual Atheisms V1
    Skeptical and Spiritual Atheisms Eric Steinhart Presented at “Skeptical versus Spiritual Atheisms”, British Society for Philosophy of Religion, Oxford University (Oriel College), 11-13 September 2013. ABSTRACT: Skeptical atheism is deeply concerned with the development of a true atheistic belief-system which competes with allegedly false theistic belief-systems. Spiritual atheists are concerned with building a successful atheistic culture to compete with an allegedly dysfunctional theistic culture. These atheisms are compared in terms of their epistemologies, metaphysics, axiologies, eschatologies, soteriologies, prosocial activities, and individual practices. Skeptical atheism is likely to remain a perpetually marginal community. Spiritual atheism may become a significant alternative to theism. 1. Introduction One way to organize the diverse ecosystem of atheisms is to arrange the various species of atheism on a spectrum with two extreme ends. On the right side of this spectrum, there is skeptical atheism. On the left side, there is spiritual atheism. Since these two atheisms are extremes, most of species of atheism lie between them. Most atheisms take features of both the skeptical and the spiritual atheisms. Consequently, by understanding these extremes, it becomes easier to understand the intermediate types. Spiritual and skeptical atheisms involve different ways of dealing with established theistic religions. Spiritual and skeptical atheisms are hostile towards each other. Stedman (2012) offers a moving account of the ways that skeptical atheists denounced his spiritual atheism. Skeptical atheism focuses on the belief model of religion (Kitcher, 2011: 1-4). The belief model treats religion as primarily a theoretical enterprise. For skeptical atheists, the most important human values are epistemic. Hence skeptical atheists are deeply concerned with the development of an allegedly true atheistic belief-system which competes with the allegedly false theistic belief-system.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf28 Amended Complaint
    Case 6:15-cv-01098-JA-DAB Document 28 Filed 08/19/15 Page 1 of 77 PageID 286 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION DAVID WILLIAMSON, CHASE HANSEL, KEITH BECHER, RONALD GORDON, JEFFERY KOEBERL, CENTRAL FLORIDA FREETHOUGHT COMMUNITY, SPACE COAST FREETHOUGHT ASSOCIATION, and HUMANIST COMMUNITY OF THE SPACE COAST, Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 6:15-cv-1098-Orl-28DAB BREVARD COUNTY, Defendant. FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (Injunctive Relief Sought) Introduction 1. In Town of Greece v. Galloway, 134 S. Ct. 1811 (2014), the U.S. Supreme Court held that local governmental bodies may open their meetings with invocations that typically have theistic content. But the Court also ruled that local governments must “maintain[ ] a policy of nondiscrimination” in deciding who may present invocations, and that the relevant policies or practices must not “reflect an aversion or bias . against minority faiths.” Id. at 1824. Thus, in upholding the invocation practice of the town at issue, the Court emphasized that the town’s “leaders maintained that a minister or layperson of any persuasion, including an atheist, could give the invocation.” Id. at 1816. 1 Case 6:15-cv-01098-JA-DAB Document 28 Filed 08/19/15 Page 2 of 77 PageID 287 2. After the Supreme Court’s decision, numerous local governmental bodies in Florida and elsewhere in America allowed nontheists — atheists, agnostics, Secular Humanists, and others who do not believe in a theistic God — to give opening invocations at governmental meetings. Yet defendant Brevard County (“the County”) has repeatedly rejected and ignored requests from atheists and Humanists to give opening invocations at meetings of its Board of County Commissioners (“the Board”).
    [Show full text]