State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Union of India (UOI) and Ors., 2011 Supreme Court of India, Judgment of 27 September 2011 This document is available at ielrc.org/content/e1111.pdf Note: This document is put online by the International Environmental Law Research Centre (IELRC) for information purposes. This document is not an official version of the text and as such is only provided as a source of information for interested readers. IELRC makes no claim as to the accuracy of the text reproduced which should under no circumstances be deemed to constitute the official version of the document. International Environmental Law Research Centre
[email protected] – www.ielrc.org JUDGMENT A.K. Patnaik, J. 1. This dispute between the State of Himachal Pradesh (Plaintiff), on the one hand, and the Union of India (defendant No. 1), State of Punjab (defendant No. 2), State of Haryana (defendant No. 3), State of Rajasthan (defendant No. 4) and Union Territory of Chandigarh (defendant No. 5), on the other hand, under Article 131 of the Constitution of India relates to the power generated in the Bhakra-Nangal and Beas Projects. The Case of the Plaintiff (State of Himachal Pradesh) in the plaint 2. The Bhakra dam across the river Satluj was proposed in the year 1944 in the Bilaspur State. The construction of Bhakra dam was to result in submergence of a large territory of the Bilaspur State but would benefit the Province of Punjab. Hence, the Raja of Bilaspur agreed to the proposal for construction of the Bhakra dam only on certain terms and conditions detailed in a draft agreement which was to be executed on behalf of the Raja of Bilaspur and the Province of Punjab.