<<

VESSELS OF CHANGE

A long-term perspective on prehistoric pottery use in southern and eastern middle based on lipid residue analyses

SVEN ISAKSSON The analysis of lipid residues in prehistoric pottery has quite recently become an integrated tool in Swedish ar- chaeology. As such it is an approach that has also been adopted in large rescue archaeology projects. This pa- per presents an attempt to compile the results of two such projects and shows how this new knowledge has contributed to research archaeology, especially in the form of new research projects. Suggestions for future research are also presented.

Key wordst Food culture, lipid residues, pottery use, change, rescue archaeology, research archaeology

INTRODUCTION This paper was originally presented at a workshop in zoog at the Lab- oratory for Ceramic Research, Lund University. It is a first attempt to reflect on trends in pottery use, based on the analysis of lipid residues from a relatively large body of material spanning several prehistoric periods in Sweden. This has been made possible thanks to close collab- orations with a number of agencies in the field of rescue archaeology, and some reflections on such collaborations will also be presented. But first I would like to put pottery use into its proper context: eating. All animals need to eat. Some species eat more or less the entire time they are awake whereas others can go without food for weeks or months. Humans stand somewhere in between and usually eat a few times a day. Within about twelve hours since the last meal humans typi- cally begin to feel hunger, and within approximately twenty hours the human body begins to adjust physiologically and enter a state com-

CUkkEHT SwEDlsH AkcHAEQLQGY, VQL I 7, 009 131 Sven Isaksson

monly known as starvation. This is, however, not the end. A healthy and normally built person can survive at least six to eight weeks with- out any food at all (Granström zoo4). But how individuals experience and react to the physiological adjustment to starvation varies enor- mously (Isaksson zoo9a). Anyhow, to live with periods of prosperity altered by short periods of need has probably been quite a regular state of affairs throughout human history. But how the need for food has been accounted for in different cultural or historical contexts varies tremendously. Man is the only mammal of its size that has managed to chisel out a living from almost every environment on the planet. This has only been possible through culture. Food and eating is something humans have engaged in heartily, pref- erably on a daily basis. Against this background it is perhaps not surpris- ing that research concerning food culture, both theoretical and empirical such, can be found in many fields including anthropology, ethnology, so- ciology, education, history and archaeology (Barthes &967; Lévi-Strauss I978; Douglas K Isherwood t 979; Montanari r994; Hill t99 g; Dietler I996; Beardsworth R Keil r997; Counihan R van Esterik t997; Dill- man r997; Isaksson zooo; Bringéus zoot; Eriksson zoo'; Ashley et al. z,oo4; Goldstein et al. zoo S ; Stjerna zoo7). Humans are in general omni- vores, and the lists of things that have been considered food are massive (cf. Kiple R Ornelas zooo; Davidson r999; Eidlitz r97r). But it is also typical that humans do not eat everything edible and available. Prefe- rences of taste are cultural constructions, things we learn, and experi- ences of tastes (good or bad) are strong sensory impressions connected with moods and memories. Sharing these sentiments with others often provides strong feelings of unity, contributing to the group identity. Dif- ferences in patterns of food and eating may therefore serve as strong boundaries between all kinds of social and cultural groups. To address such questions archaeologists may study the artefacts and features connected with cooking and eating found among settle- ment remains and grave-goods. More detailed studies may include os- teological investigations of bones from food waste as well as analyses of plant macrofossils found in soil samples. Other information might be gathered through the analysis of food remains found adhering to and absorbed into ceramic vessels (cf. Evershed et al. zoot). Absorbed residues, which are the focus of this paper, provide a means to compare contributions from various foods (e.g. animals and plants) difficult to acquire in any other way, and also a means to get direct evidence of

13 Cuiewrr"x Sxvrnrsu AwcnwEouocx; Vou iy, ~oas Vessels of chc(nge

foods that leave few other traces (e.g. milk and many plants). At archaeological sites, the structures, features, layers and artefacts associated with food and eating constitute the material remains of a whole range of culinary practices performed in a variable set of different food-cultural contexts (cf. Isaksson zoogb). Much of what is found in a settlement investigation may actually be connected with subsistence in one way or another: waste layers, hearths, pits, potsherds, bones, stone tools, buildings, fences, etc. The cultural aspects of food and eat- ing have consequences for the evaluation of any of these subsistence- related materials, including data obtained by various technical analy- ses. Contextual considerations are significant for the selection of sam- pling strategies and analytical techniques as well as for interpretations of such data. Differences between social or cultural groups in these patterns of culinary practice may leave detectable traces. However, these signals may be very different depending on whether the culinary context where they are produced relates to food production, storage, preparation, representation or consumption. The culinary contextual comparability or consistency of records must be established as far as possible. With an awareness of culinary contexts it is possible to set data from different contexts against each other (cf. Isaksson et al. zoo'; Olsson R Isaksson z, oo8). With such an integrated approach there is hope of catching the complexity and to begin to try and understand prehistoric cultures of food.

ORGANIC FOOD RESIDUES The chemical analysis of organic food residues has quite recently be- come an integrated tool in archaeology (Evershed zoo8a). In Sweden systematic analyses began in the early z c1 laos (Slytå R Arrhenius x E1 y(1) but it was not until the late zc1c1os and early z, ooos that these kinds of approaches were incorporated into large-scale rescue archaeology projects, such as those at Kristineberg Syd and Oxie in , southern Sweden (Fig. z). And it was not until the Eq highway project through Uppland, central Sweden (Fig. z), in the early zooos that the analysis of organic residues was incorporated at an early stage of a project, with huge benefits especially regarding sampling strategies. During use, prehistoric pottery often adsorbed fluids from the food or other products stored or processed in them. These fluids contain among other things lipids (fats, oils, waxes), which have been proved to survive relatively well over depositional time (cf. Evershed et al.

CURREEEI S(( EDISII AREIIAEDLDDY VDL 17~ 009 133 Sven Isaksson

p of southern and middle Sweden show- ion of the sites dealt with in this paper. zoor). The composition of these lipid residues depends on what has been processed in the pot and how; that is, it depends on pottery use. There is some evidence that lipids from the last few uses of the vessel will dominate the lipid residues extracted from prehistoric potsherds (Craig et al. zoo4). However, experiments have shown that different food- stuffs leave signals of different strength and staying power (Isaksson — et al. zoo4:g r g g r y; Olsson R Isaksson zoo8:yyy; Evershed zoo8b). Many lean foods leave negligible traces whereas the signal from others may survive many consecutive uses. Therefore there may be a range of varying time-depths in the specific lipid classes of any given residue, but different pottery uses will leave different lipid residues. The compilation of results in this paper is based on samples from a total of zog vessels. Of these vessels, 6q come from five Neolithic sites ranging in time from gSoo to zgoo BC. Most of these sites were seasonal and coastal settlements associated with the so-called , but at the latest site the ceramics show parallels with late Battle Axe and Late Neolithic pottery. All the Neolithic sites are from eastern middle Sweden. The Bronze Age is represented by 4S vessels, z4 of which come from three Early/Middle Bronze Age sites in eastern

134 CURRENT SWEDlsH ARcHAEOLocY, VOL I 7, 2009 Vessels of change

middle Sweden and z, z from a single Late Bronze Age site in southern Sweden. The Iron Age is represented by 89 vessels: ry from an Early Iron Age site in southern Sweden and yg from four Late Iron Age sites in eastern middle Sweden. Most of these potsherds were collected carefully already during excavation; they were never handled with bare hands, and they were wrapped in aluminium foil, bagged, tagged and stored in a freezer until analysed in order to avoid post-excavation changes and contamination. Potsherds from the rim and upper body were given priority as these have higher lipid content in general (cf. Charters et al. I993). The exact sample selection was in the hands of each site-director and some of the sites were sampled to answer site-specific questions rather than to provide a representative material. The sampling strate- gies vary among intra-site studies based on spatial organisation issues, vessel-size variations and the characterisation ofcertain contexts. There are also huge chronological and spatial gaps as well as painfully large differences in the sample sizes compared. Some of the rules of the sta- tistical techniques applied (i.e. random samples and clearly defined populations) may therefore have been violated. All these problems are knowingly ignored; the comparisons presented in this paper are made in order to identify essential issues for future research rather than to provide any answers.

ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUE — From each potsherd a r 3 g sample was ground off using a low-speed pottery grinder, after first removing the outer millimetre in order to avoid contamination from the soil. After adding an internal standard (n-hexatriacontane) lipids were extracted to a solvent (chloroform/ methanol, z1 t) by means of sonication. The extract was transferred to a vial and the solvent removed by a gentle stream of nitrogen. The li- pid residues were treated with bis(trimethylsilyl) trifluoracetamide with t—ro % (v) chlorotrimethylsilane to produce trimethylsilyl derivatives and analysed by gas chromatography and mass spectrometry (GCMS). A more detailed description of the technique may be found elsewhere (e.g. Isaksson zooo; Olsson & Isaksson zoo8).

INTERPRETATION Archaeological lipid residues are complex mixtures of up to hundreds of components. A few of these are origin-specific biomarkers while

CURRERT SR'EDISH ARcslAEQLQGY, VQL I 7) 2009 135 Sven Isaksson

others may derive from a limited number of different sources. The for- mation processes behind the lipid residues are complex, and they are affected qualitatively by different depositional environments. Except for extreme conditions the environmental effects seem to be quantita-

tively minor, as indicated by experiments (Hjulström 8c Isaksson z oo S ). Any significant differences between pottery assemblages in these meas- ures are therefore strong indicators of a difference in pottery use. But to tell exactly what has been put in a pot may be difficult (Barnard et al. zoo6) without any archaeological questions or perceptions of what was available in the cultural and historical context in question. The residues are the result of culture, as it is the choices of the users that de- termine what went into the pots and how they were used. More often then not there was more than one ingredient, adding to the chemical complexity of the residues. The interpretation of the precise pottery use is therefore in essence a case of the inference to the best explanation (cf. Harman ze16S), with all its flaws. Moreover, there are many other culinary arts besides cooking in a pot, which is why lipid residues do not reflect the whole diet (Olsson R Isaksson zoo8). With the analytical technique that we apply it is possible to iden- tify lipids from terrestrial animals, marine animals or fish, and from vegetables. It is also possible to get indications of lipids from ruminant animals and milk fat. The detection of cholesterol or any decomposi- tion product of it is evidence for animal lipids. A high ratio (&o.S) of the fatty acids stearic (Cz 8:o) to palmitic (Cz 6:o) acid is indicative of a large contribution from terrestrial animal lipids (Isaksson zooo). Con- tributions from vegetables are detected by the presence of phytosterols, waxes or wax residues (long-chain fatty acids, alkanols and alkanes) (cf. Charters et al. zge1y) or a low C t 8:o/Cz 6:o-ratio. Certain polyun- saturated fatty acids may be transformed to co-(o-alkylphenyl) alkanoic acids when heated (Matikainen et al. z, oog). Vegetable oils are rich in Cz 8 polyunsaturated acids, and Cz 8 co-(o-alkylphenyl)alkanoic acids are therefore an indication of this in a prehistoric sample. Marine ani- mal oil residues are rich in Cz 6-Czo co-(o-alkylphenyl)alkanoic acids and should also contain two isoprenoic acids and have a low C t8:o/ C z 6:o-ratio (Hansel et al. z.ooq). Fish lipids may also leave traces in the form of a low Cz 8:o/Cz 6:o-ratio together with the presence of choles- terol (Olsson zoo'). One of the two isoprenoic acids mentioned above, called phytanic acid, may also be produced through the decomposi- tion of chlorophyll, indicating the presence of green vegetables. Milk

136 CURRENT SN EDISH ARCHAEOLOGYy VOL I 7y 200$ Vessels of chrtnge

lipids may be detected by the presence of a broad distribution of tria- cylglycerols. These compounds are, however, often decomposed and require favourable preservation conditions to survive. As an indica- tion for ruminant lipids in general (from the animal or from milk) we use a ratio of the branched Cty:o fatty acids to Cr8:o (cf. Hjulström et al. 2oo8:68).During use free fatty acids in the vessel wall may react and form long-chain ketones, but at temperatures higher than during normal cooking (Evershed et al. tgctg; Evershed 2oo8b). But pottery may not only be used for food, but for the storage and processing of tars and pitches.

FROM THE NEOLITHIC TO THE EARLY/MIDDLE BRONZE AGE IN UPPLAND This comparison includes three Bronze Age and five Neolithic pottery assemblages along Highway E4 through Uppland (Table t), excavated by UV (GAL) and SAU. The Neolithic material is exclusively from Pitted Ware sites, except at Djurstugan where there are parallels with late Battle Axe and late Neolithic pottery.

Table t. The sites along Hlghway By in Uppland (cf. Fig. I ) discussed in this paper (cf. Fontell å' Jahn aooy; Srse aooä, Lindberg aoo6; Ytterberg aoo6; Sundström et al. aoo6; Nilsson aoo6; Björck åc Larsson aoo7; Hlärtner-Holdar et al. Eoog; Björck åc Hjärtner-Holdar ~ oog).

The distributions of pottery use in the Neolithic and Bronze Age as- 2 semblages are presented in figure 2, . A y -test shows that there is a sig- nificant difference between the distributions (y, =2cf.8o, df=c), p=o.ooo8), indicating a significant change in pottery use between the two periods. The striking difference is the much more specialised pottery use in the Bronze Age material, dominated by vegetables and pine tars. Excluding the Bronze Age tar pots, the lipid content in the Neolithic is higher than in the Bronze Age material but the reliability of the dif-

CUIIEENT Swrl&lsn ARCHAEOLOGY, VOL I 7, '009 'l 37 Sven Isaksson

No 16

12

Neolithic

0 E./M. Bronze A. AV RV RVC AVC FMVC FMV FM V T Pottery-use l'igure 2, . The distribution of pottery-use classifications of lipid residues from Neolithic and Bronze Age pottery (Table t). Abbreviations of pottery-use classes: A= terrestrial animal, V=vegetables, R=ruminant (milk or from ani- mal), C=condensation products (compounds formed during heating), FM=fish/ marine animal, T=tar, E=no lipid residues found.

ference is above the p&o.o5 level (F(z, 8 z) = z.3c) p=o. z z6). This is due to the great variation in the Neolithic material, and a larger sample is needed to test this relation. In the Neolithic the ceramic seems to have been used for virtually everything, but in the Bronze Age the pottery use is practically limited to the storage (and probably processing) of vegetable foods, and of tar from pine. The Pitted Ware culture has in early research been characterised as a rather homogeneous coastal hunter-gatherer culture with an emphasis on marine mammal hunting and fishing (cf.Löfstrand T ciy4). In the present material there are traces of marine/fish in about 35 % of the potsherds and of terrestrial animals in about r4 %, which may seem to corrobo- rate the marine centre of attention. But there are traces of vegetables in about yz % of the analysed potsherds, emphasising the importance of plants, nuts and tubers. There are also great variations and significant differences in pottery use both between and possibly within the Pitted Ware sites as well as changes over time. For example the Postboda site includes three adjacent sites and there are significant differences between all of them, be it qualitative or quantitative (Isaksson zoo5a). One of the sites at Postboda has a pottery-use distribution that is actually more similar to the much later site of Brännpussen (Table z), while another Postboda assemblage has a significantly different distribution (y =z4.z8, df=y, p=o.o46) from the later site. This is indicative of a modulated and

138 CURRENT SYVEDISFI ARCHAEOLOCY, VOL I 7, 200$ Vessels of change

dynamic, rather than monotonous and static, culture of food within the Pitted Ware culture (cf. Brorsson et al. z, ooy). If the very limited pottery use in the Bronze Age reflects the diet it would have been a very unbalanced one indeed. The change in pottery use from the Neolithic to the Bronze Age is rather the result of a change in the culinary arts, that is, the arts and techniques of food preparation. The Early Bronze Age of eastern middle Sweden saw the emergence of a new kind of ancient monument, namely heaps of fire-cracked stones. In early research these heaps were exclusively connected with the cook- ing of food (e.g. Almgren r9rz; Ekholm r9zr), and heated stones can be used for cooking in a number of ways, from cooking in pits to cooking in wooden or leather containers (Isaksson r99g). The emer- gence of the heaps in the Early Bronze Age may be explained by such a change in the culinary arts, but why this change would occur is yet to be understood. More recent interpretations of the features have put emphasis on possible ritual aspects of the heaps (e.g. Lundqvist?99I; Kaliff r999). This is not necessarily in contradiction to an important functional aspect. A practical importance may rather be in support of a ritualised treatment of the waste produced from the practice. Most of the vegetable lipid residues in the Bronze Age pottery de- rive from adipose tissue rather than waxes, possibly from cereals. This coincides in time with some of the earliest demarked fields and roughly also with the appearance of ploughing scenes in rock carvings. The milk residue, identified by a broad distribution of intact triacylglycer- ols, is found from the early Bronze Age (c. r zoo—r zoo BC) (Hjulstöm zoo'). The impact of agriculture is clear in this period, and the changes in pottery use discussed above are certainly also connected with the establishment of a more settled agricultural lifestyle. The large number of pots with traces of pine tar shows that destruc- tive distillation of pine-wood was practised. But how this was done is still unknown. The earliest tar production features in eastern middle Sweden, and indeed in Europe, are radiocarbon dated to AD z4o—g4o (Hjulström et al. zoo6). An alternative is the so-called double-pot tech- nique, which requires a distillation pot with a hole in the bottom for the tar to run through, but to my knowledge there are no finds of such pots in the present material. Birch bark pitches have been produced in Scandinavia through destructive distillation since before the introduc- tion of pottery (Aveling r998). Birch bark pitch may have been used as incense in the Early Iron Age (Isaksson zoo' b), and in the Late Iron

CURREHT SwEDIRH AROHAEDEDOY VDL Ez 2009 139 Sven Isaksson

Age there are indications that birch bark pitches were closely associ- ated with the ritual sphere and the pitches from pine or spruce with more profane, practical uses (Sandelin zcici8). As to the use of the tar in the Bronze Age vessels, it is tempting to connect it with ships and seafaring and with the appearance of ships in rock carvings. The tar may also have been applied in order to seal the vessels.

FROM THE LATE BRONZE AGE TO THE EARLY IRON AGE IN SCANIA This material was sampled during rescue excavations at two adjacent sites, Kristineberg Syd and Oxie in Scania (Fig. T. ), under. the direction of Malmö Kulturmiljö. The material consists of zr samples from the Late Bronze Age and 14 samples from the Early Iron Age. Both pe- riods are represented at both sites. There is no significant difference in the distribution of pottery uses (Fig. g) between these two periods (y, =r z, .z, df=8, p=o. 14).

No. of observations

L. Bronze A.

0 E. Iran A AV RV RVC VC AVC FM V T E Pottery-use

Figure 1.The distribution of pottery-use classifications (cf. Fig. z) of lipid residues from the I..;Ite Bronze Age and Early Iron Age at Kristineberg Syd and Oxte, Scania.

But there is significantly (t =-3.18, df=gg, p=o.oogz) lower lipid residue contents in the Bronze Age material than in the material from the Early Iron Age. This is probably not due to the age difference and a higher degree of decomposition of the Bronze Age material, as the Neolithic material from Uppland also has higher amounts of lipid res- idues. If the pottery was more fragile in the Late Bronze Age a shorter life-time of the vessels could be an explanation. But the quality of pot-

140 CURRENT SYEEDISH ARCHAEOLOGY, VOL I 7, zooe Vessels of change

tery is generally better in the Late Bronze Age than in the Early Iron Age (Stilborg, personal communication), and the difference could therefore be assumed to be connected with pottery use. In the Bronze Age material traces of Cz 8 tu-(o-alkylphenyl)alkanoic acids were found in one sample and in the Iron Age material in six sam- ples, a difference that also is significant (y =y.6z, df=z, p=o.oas 8).This is an indication of an increased use of oil-rich vegetables, such as flax, hemp or gold-of-pleasure (cf. Isaksson et al. zoo'). Flax and gold-of- pleasure have been cultivated at least since the Late Bronze Age, and hemp was introduced in the Early Iron Age (Welinder r998). This in- creased use of oil-rich plants may be the explanation to the higher li- pid residue content in Early Iron Age material. A potential increase in indications of ruminant lipids may also contribute, if this includes sec- ondary products such as butter.

LONG-TERM PERSPECTIVE ON POTTERY USE IN SWEDEN In this comparison all the above samples are included, as well as analy- ses of yg Late Iron Age samples from four sites in Uppland: two close to Vendel Church in Vendel Parish, one at Valsgärde in Gamla Upp- sala Parish, and one at Tuna in Alsike Parish (Fig. t) (Isaksson zooo; Olsson zoo4; Isaksson et al. zoo'; Hjulström R Isaksson zoo'; Ols- son R Isaksson zoo8). In total the number of analysed potsherds in- cluded is I94, excluding the tar pots and concentrating on samples with food residues. There are statistically significant differences in the amounts of lipid residues (Fig. 4) in pottery from different periods (F(4, :t 84) = g.8y, p = o.oo48). What seems consistent in both southern and middle Swe- den is the low lipid residue content in the Bronze Age pottery. It seems unlikely that this is due to post-depositional degradation and is rather to be attributed to a deviating pottery use in this period. The lipid resi- due content is dependant on many variables such as what was intro- duced into the pot (lean or fat foods) and how the vessels were used (for cooking, storage or serving). A large range of lipid residue con- tent is consequently indicative of a wide range of uses (Charters et al. t99g:zzo). The larger standard deviations of the Neolithic and Late Iron Age materials thus indicate a wider range of uses in these periods than in the intermediate ones. A high Cz 8:o/Cz 6:o-ratio is indicative of a large contribution from terrestrial animal lipids (Fig. g). There is a significant difference in this

CURRERT SIREDIEH AROHREol ocYp VQL I 7 009 Sven Isaksson

Content (IIg/g) 6000

5000

4000

3000

2000

1000

+Std. Dev.

-1000 xstd. Err. Ei -2000 Mean Neo I ithic L. Bronze A. L. Iron Age Period E./M. Bronze A. E. Iran Age

Figure 4. The distnbution of lipid residue content (pg/g) in potsherds from various prehistoric periods in Stveden.

2,2

1,4

Ct 1,0 Cl

Ü 0,6

0,2

W +Sid Dev -0,2 M LSId. Err NeoliihIc L Bronze A L Iron Age Mean E.IM Bronze A. E Iron Age Penod

Figure S.The distribution of C/g:o/C I 6:o fatty acid ratios in lipid residues from potsherds from various prehistoric periods in Sweden. A high ratio indicates large contributions from terres- trial animal.

ratio between the periods (F(4, z4y) = y. gz, , p = o.ooo) mainly due to the very specialised pottery use in the Early/Middle Bronze Age. The rel- atively low ratio in the Neolithic period can probably be attributed to the higher degree of lipid residues from marine resources, and the even lower ratio in the Bronze Age period is in accordance with vegetable resi- dues. The relatively low standard deviation in both this ratio and in lipid

147 CURBENT StvEDISH AkCHAEOLOGY) VOL I 2, zoog I/essels of change

residue content confirms a very limited range of uses in the Bronze Age material. The total dataset seems to indicate a general trend of increase in the culinary exploitation of terrestrial animals over time. The distributions of inferred pottery uses from the different periods are too complex (Fig. 6) to be discussed in detail in this short paper. The discussion will be limited to some reflections on the changes in the range of uses. To illustrate the changes in diversity of pottery use a diver- sity index (DI) was calculated using the formula Dl=t/g(X[K n/roo) ) where K is n the percentage of each pottery use in the distribution from each period (Fig. 6).A high DI indicates a high diversity in pottery use and a low DI that pottery was used for few purposes; a DI of z means that all pots were used for a single purpose. The calculated indices are presented in figure ~, The diversity is high in the Neolithic and lowest in the Early/Middle Bronze Age. There is a general increase towards the Late Iron Age, which also shows the highest level of diversity. The qualitative diversity index of distributions of pottery-use classifica- tions is thus in accordance with the quantitative range widths of lipid residue content (Fig. y).

45

40

35

ern 30 42 m 25 2 lo 0 20 15 rs 10 M Neoiiihic ~ E IM. Bronze A ~ L. Bronze A E IronA AV RVC AVG FMRVC FMV V T ~ RV VC FMVC FMAVC FM A E RB L Iron Age Pottery-use

Figure 15. The distribution of pottery-use classifications (cf. Fig z. ) of lipid residues from the Neo- lithic (Uppland), Early/Middle Bronze Age (Uppland), Late Bronze Age (Scania), Early Iron Age (Scania) and Late Iron Age (Uppland) in Sweden.

Current and future research The foregoing presentation has generated more questions than answers regarding prehistoric pottery use in Sweden, which also was my intent. The results discussed are based on quite small samples and there is still much to do, but some general conclusions can be drawn.

CuRRENT SWEDISH ARCHAEOLOGY, voL I 7y 009 l43 Sven Isaksson

2,4

2, 3

2,2

1,9

1,8

1,7 Neohthtc E IM. Bronze A L Bronze A. E. Iron Age L. Iron Age Period

Figure y. Diversity indices of pottery-use distributions (Ftg. g) from various pre- historic periods tn Sweden. A high dtversity index indicates a high diversity in pottery use and a low index that pottery was used for few purposes.

The pottery use in the Neolithic Pitted Ware culture in Uppland is characterised by a great diversity and complexity both between and within the various sites and through time. In contrast, the pottery use in the Early/Middle Bronze Age is much more limited and also more uniform between sites. The pottery use in Late Bronze Age Scania is more varied, but one trait in common with the Uppland Bronze Age material is the relatively low lipid residue content. In Scania there are significant changes in pottery use between the Late Bronze Age and Early Iron Age at one and the same site. The Late Iron Age material shows a great diversity in pottery use, and differences are found both within and between sites. The most neglected period is the Early Iron Age and spatially there are vast uncharted territories. Some crucial questions that may be iden- tified from the compilation presented in this paper are: whether and how the pottery use in the Pitted Ware culture differs from other Neo- lithic cultures; whether the difference between the Neolithic and Early/ Middle Bronze Age is a local phenomenon in Uppland; whether the difference between the Late Bronze Age and Early Iron Age is a local phenomenon in Scania; and whether the difference between the Early Iron Age in Scania and the Late Iron Age in Uppland is a geographical or chronological difference.

144 Cuttrrrt't Serrotslt AacHAEOLOGY, Vor. r2, oos Vessels of change

Then there is the question of dairying. The earliest evidence for milk in the material presented above is from the Early Bronze Age. The Neolithic material presented here followed Highway E4 through cen- tral northern Uppland. In the Neolithic this was a coastal archipelago landscape, and to find the traces of early agriculture one would have to look for materials on higher ground. Several of these issues are currently being approached. Research questions emanating from the observed patterns of Bronze Age pottery use are currently being tackled within the Spartan way of life project, financed by the Swedish Research Council. With a focus on ritual ver- sus profane pottery use, a Master's thesis connected with this project has recently been published (Karlsson z, oog). Neolithic Funnel Beaker pottery, traditionally associated with the introduction of agriculture, is being analysed within the Cultaptation project, financed by the Sixth Framework Prograrnme of the European Commission. In collaboration with Fredrik Hallgren, a small pilot inves- tigation of vessels from a sacrificial fen at the site of Skogsmossen in Väst- manland (Hallgren et al. rygg) has been performed, providing promis- ing results. Worth mentioning is the identification of milk lipid residues (from the distribution of intact triacylglycerides) in this early material. Currently samples from a total of rya Neolithic vessels have been ana- lysed, from the Early to Late Neolithic, and further sampling is under way. The issue of the introduction of dairying will be thoroughly scruti- nised through the LeChe project, financed by the EU and in collabora- tion with the Organic Geochemistry Unit of the School of Chemistry at the University of Bristol, UK. Another investigation of vessels from two spatially adjacent though chronologically separate sites in Söderman- land, one with predominately Funnel Beaker pottery and the other with exclusively Pitted Ware pottery, shows significant differences in pottery use with respect to the different pottery styles (Ohlberger zoo'). I would like to characterise the underlying work as mutually open- minded collaborations between research and rescue archaeology. It is a collaboration that has generated new and systematic knowledge of the past. This new knowledge has in one way or another contributed to all the above-mentioned projects, all of which are in the forefront of their respective fields. That the exact sample selection was in the hands of each site-director had the advantage of providing answers to site- specific questions. In the future this could be supplemented by a more general sampling strategy in order to provide a representative material

CURREYT SR'EDIEH AROHAEQLocY, VQL I 7, '009 145 Sven Isaksson

for answering questions of food culture practice that demand inter-site comparisons of pottery use.

Sven Isaksson, The Archaeological Research Laboratory, Department ot Archaeology and Classical Studies, Universtty to6 9t Stockholm, Sweden

References

Almgren, O. I 9tz. En uppländsk bronsålderhydda. Fornvannen, Vol y.

Ashley B., Hollows, J., Jones, S. öc Taylor, B. zoo4. Food and Cultural Studies. Lon- don: Routledge. Aveling, E.M. I 998.Characterisation ofnatural products from the Mesolithic ofnorth- ern Europe. Department of Archaeological Science. University of Bradford.

Barnard, H. , Ambrose, S.H., Beehr, D. E., Forster, M. D., Lanehart, R. E., Malainey, M. E., Parr, R. E., Rider, M. Solazzo, C. öc Yohe II, R. M. zoo'. Mixed results of seven methods for organic residue analysis applied to one vessel with the residue of a known foodstuff. Journal ofArchaeological Science, Vol 14:t.Pp. z8—åy.

Barthes, R. I 96y. Elements of Semiology. London: Cape.

Beardsworth, A. öc Keil, T. I 997.Sociology on the menu: an mvttation to the study of food and society. London: Routledge. Bjorck, N. öc Hjärtner-Holdar, E. (Eds. ). zoo8. Mellan hav och skog. Högntossen, en stenå ldersmtllö vid en skimrande strandi norra Uppland. Volym 6.Arkeologi E4 Upp)and —studier. Uppsala: Riksantikvarieambetet UV GAL.

Björck, N. öc Larsson, F. (Eds. ) zoo'. SnÅret. Aspekter på sten-, brons- och järn- ålder i Vendel. UV GAI, Rapport zoo'&r4. Uppsala: Riksantikvarieämbetet UV GAL. Bringéus, N. -A. zoot. Man, Food and MIIIeu. A SIvedish Approach to Food Ethnol- ogy. East Linton: Tuckwell. Brorsson, T., Isaksson, S. öc Stenbäck, N. zoo'. Stil gods och kärlanvändning. Sten- back, N (Ed.). Stenålderni Uppland. UppdragsarkeologI och eftertanke. Volym r. Arkeolog& E4 Uppland —studier. Uppsala: Riksantikvarieämbetet UV GAL.

Charters, S., Evershed, R. P., Goad, L.J., Heron, C. öc Blinkhorn, P. W. E991.Quan- tification and distribution of lipids in archaeological ceramic: implications for sampling potsherds for organic residue analysis and the classification of pottery use. Archaeometry, Vol SS:z.Pp. EI I —zzå.

Charters, S., Evershed, R. P., Quye, A., Blinkhorn, P. W. öc Reeves, V. t99y. Sim- ulation experiments for determtning the use of ancient pottery vessels: the behaviour of epicuticular leaf wax during boiling of leafy vegetable. Journal of Archaeological Science, Vol z4:t. Pp. I —y.

Craig, O. E., Love, G. D., Isaksson, S. Taylor, G. öc Snape, C. E. zoo4. Stable car- bon isotopic characterisation of free and bound lipid constituents of archaeo- logical ceramic vessels released by solvent extractton, alkaline hydrolysis and catalytic hydropyrolysis. Journal ofAnalyti cal and A pphed Pyrolysis, Vol y t :z. Pp. 6I I—6Å4. Counihan, C. öc Van Esterik, P. (Eds. ) t99y. Food and Culture. A Reader. New York: Routledge.

146 CURRENT SLVEoISH ARCIIAEOLOGY, VOL I 7, E009 Vessels of change

Davidson, A. T999. The Oxford Companion to Food. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Dietler, M. 1996. Feasts and Commensal Politics in the Political Economy. Food, Power and Status in Prehistoric Europe. Weissener, P. 5c Schiefenhövel, W. (Eds. ). Food and the Status Quest. An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Providence, R.lc Berghahn Books. Dillman, F.-X. I997. De rituella gästabuden i fornskandinavisk religion. Hultgård, A. (Ad): Uppsalakulten och Adam av Bremen. Nora: Nya Doxa. Douglas, &V(. 5c Isherwood, B. I979. The World of Goods: Towards an Anthropo- logy of Consumpti on. London: Allen Lane. Dudd, S. N. , Evershed, R. P. 5c Gibson, A. M. &999. Evidence for Varying Pat- terns of Exploitation of Animal Products in Different Prehistoric Pottery Tradi- tions Based on Lipids Preserved in Surface and Absorbed Residues. Journal of — Archaeolr&gical Science, Vol z6: t z. Pp I473 & 48z.

Fidlitz, K. i 97T. Föda och nöd föda. Hur mä nmskan använde vildmarkens tillgångar. Stockholm: LT.

Ekholm, G. t 9zt. Studier i Upplands bebyggelseh&storia. II. Bronsålder. Uppsala: Akad. Bokh. Evershed, R. P. zooga. Organic residue analysis in archaeology: the archaeological biomarker revolution. Archaeometry, Vol 5o:6. Pp. 895—924. Evershed, R.P. z oogb. Experimental approaches to the interpretation of absorbed organic residues in archaeological ceramics. World Archaeology, Vol 4o: n Pp z6—47. Evershed, R. P., Stott, A. W., Raven, A. , Dudd, A. N. , Charters, S.5c Leyden, A. i 995. Formatton of Loch-Chain Ketones in Ancient Pottery Vessels by Pyrolysis of Acyl Lipids. Tetrahedron Letters, Vol 36. Pp. 8875—8878. Evershed, R. P., Dudd, S. N. , Lockhart, iV(. J. 5c Jim, S. zoot. Lipids in archaeology. Handbook ofArchaeological Science. Chtchester: John Wiley 5c Sons Ltd. Eriksson, G. zoo3. Norm and difference. Stone Age dietary practice in the Baltic region. Theses and Papers in Scientific Archaeology 5. The Archaeological Re- search Laboratory. Stockholm: Stockholm Universtty. Fontell, Y. 5c Jahn, K. (Eds. ). zoo4. Arkeolog& E4. Årsberättelse zoo3. Utgrävningar från Uppsala till . Uppsala: . Goldstein, D., Mennell, S. Merkle, K. 5c Parasecoli, F. zoo5. Culinary cultures of Europe: identity, dtversity and dialogue. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Pub- lishing.

Granstrom, E. zoo4. Kroppens energiomsättning i en svältsituation. Överleva, Vol 5 I. Hallgren, F., Djerw, U. , Af Geijerstam, M. 5 Steineke, M. 1997.Skogsmossen, an Early Neolithic settlement site, and sacrificial fen, in the northern borderland of the Funnel-beaker Culture. Tor, Vol z9. Pp 49—I I I. Hansel, F. A., Copley, M. S., Madureira, L. A. S. 5c Evershed, R. P. z, oo4. Thermally produced t»-(o-alkylphenyl)alkanoic acids provide evidence for the processing of marine products in archaeological pottery vessels. Tetrahed on Letters, Vol 45:I4 PP 2999-3«». Harman, G. T965. The inference to the best explanation. Philosophical Rev&ew, Vol 74: i . Pp 88—95.

Hill, J. D. 1 995. Ritual and Rubbishi n the Iron Age of Wessex. A study on the for- mation of a specific archaeolog&cal record. BAR British Series z.4z. Oxford: Tempus Reparatum. Hjulstrom, B. zoo5. Lipidanalys av ett keramikkarl från tidig bronsålder, Kyrsta, Ärentuna sn, Up. Uppdragsrapport z. 5. The Archaeological Research Labora- tory. Stockholm: Stockholm University.

CURRENT SWEDISH ARCHAEOLOGY, VOL I 7, 2009 147 Sven Isaksson

Hjulstrom, B. å Isaksson, S. Rooå. Tidevarv i Tiina. Arkeologiska imdersr3kningar i Tiina b»r, Alsrke sn, Uppland. Rapporter frÅn Arkeologiska forskningslahoratoriet 3.The Archaeologrcal Research Laboratory. Stockholm: Stockholm University. Hjulström, B., Isaksson, S. å Hennius, A. Roo6. Organic geochemical evidence for mr production in Mrddle Fastern Ssveden. Journal of Arclraeological Science — 33: . PP R83 R94. Hjulström, B.Isaksson, S. åc Karlsson, C. zoo8. Prominent Migration Period Build- ing. Lipid and elemental analyses from an excavation at Alby, Botkyrka, Soder- manland, Ssveden. Acta Archaeologi ca 99. Pp 6z—y8. Hjartner-Holdar, E., Eriksson, T. åz Östling, A. (Fds. ).zoo8. Mellan himmel ochjord. Ryssgärdet, en guldskimrande bronsåldersmillö I centrala Upplarrd. Volym 3. Arkeologi E4 Uppland —studier. Uppsala. Riksantikvarieambetet UV GAL. Isaksson, S. L995. Den heta stenen —matarkeologi och overlevnad. Överleva, Vol L9. Isaksson, S. Rooo. Fond and Rank iri Early Medieval Ti»ie. Theses and Papers in Scientific Archaeology 3.The Archaeological Research Laboratory. Sttrckholm: Stockholm Universitv.

Isaksson, S. zooåa. Analys av organiska lämningar i keramik från lokalerna Post- boda r (Raä a38) och a (Raä a39) samt Skjutbanan, Tierp sn, Uppland. Un- published report. Isaksson, S. zooSb. Food for the Gods —An analysis of orgrnic residues from the Havor treasure. Nylén, E. Lund-Hansen, U. å IVlanneke, P. zoo&. The Havor Hoard. The Gold —The Bronze —The Fort. KVHAA Handlingar. Antikvariska serien 46. Stockholm: Kungl. Vittehets historie och antikvitets akademien. Isaksson, S. zoo9a. Strapats —lärospån från vildmarken. Överleva, Vol 63. Isaksson, S. Roo9b. ln press. I.ood for thought. On the culture of food and the interpretation of ancient subsistence data. Jour&ial of Nordic Archaeological Scrence, vol Ty. Isaksson, S. Hjulström, B. åc Wo]nar-Johansson, M. zoo4. The analysis of soil or- gamc material and metal elemants in cultural layers and ceramics. Larsen, J. H. åc Rolfsen, P. (Eds. ). Halvdanshaugen: arkeologi, historie og naturvidenskap. Occasional Papers vol 3. Oslo: Universitetets kulturhistoriske museer.

Isaksson, S., Olsson, M. åc Hjulström, B.zoo y. De smorde sina krås. Spår av vegetabi- — lisk olja i keramik från yngre järnålder. Fornvännen, Vol Ioo:3.Pp r y9 T9z. Kaliff, A. 1999. Objekt och tanke. Speglingar av bronsålderns föreställningsvärld. Olausson, IVI. (Ed.). Spiralens öga. Tjugo artrklar krmg aktuell bronså ldersforsk- ning. Riksantikvarieämbetet, Skrifter Nr zy. Stockholm: Riksantikvarieambetet. Karlsson, C. Roo9. Food Culturein Ritual and Profane Crrntexts —organi c residue analyses of vessels from trvo 8ronze Age sitesi n Uppland, Siveden. IVlasters the- sis. Archaeological Research Laboratorv. Stockholm: Stockholm University.

Kiple, K. F. åc Ornelas, K. C. (Eds. ) aooo. The Cambridge World History of Food. Vol r åc z. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lévr-Strauss, C. I 9»8. lntroduction to a Science of M»thology. Vol 3 :The Origin of Table Manners. London: Cape. Lindberg, K.-F. (Ed.). Roo6. Gladjen —rast- och jaktplatser från tidigneolitikum till bronsålder. UV GAL, Rapport zoo6I3. Uppsala: Riksantikvarieambetet, UV GAL.

Lundqvist, I . T99 r . Undersökta skarvstenshögar i Västsvenge. Arkeologi r Sverige i. Stockholm: Riksantikvarieämbetet. Löfstrand, L. L9y4. Yngre stenå Iderns kustboplatseri Undersökmngarna vidÄ s och studier i den gropkeramiska kulturens kroirologi och ekologi. Uppsala: Upp- sala University.

148 CURRENT SREEDIsrr ARcHAEOLOGY, VOL I 7) 009 Vessels of change

Matikainen, J., Kaltia, S., Ala-peilari, M., Petit-Gras, N. , Harju, K., Heikkila, J., Yksjarvi, R. (Ic Hase, T. zoo3. A study of I,S-hydrogen shift and cyclization reactions of an alkali isomerized rnethyl linolenoate. Tetrahedro&r, Vol 39:4.Pp 867—373. Montanari, M. &994. The C«lt«re of Food. Oxford: Blackwell. Nilsson, M.-L. (Fd.).zoo6. Brännpussen —en rnellanneolitisk kustboplats. UVCAL, Rapport zoo4:z. Uppsala: Riksantikvarieämbetet, UV GAL. Ohlberger, A.-S. zoo9. Distinguished by c«ltrire. A stirdy of lipid residiie content in Neolrthic potsherds fro&n TrösslaandÖve&ddain the pansh ofTrosa-Vagnharad, Södermanland, S&veden. Master's thesis. Archaeological Research Laboratory. Stockholm: Stockholm Universitv. Olsson, M. zoo4. Skarvor från det förflutna. En FTIR- och CCMS-analys av kera- rnik från Tiiirai Alsrke, Uppla&id. IVlasters thesis. The Archaeological Research Laboratorv. Stockholm: Stockholm Universitv. Olsson, M. Lc Isaksson, S. zoog. IVIolecular and isotopic traces of cooking and con- sumption of fish at an Early &Medieval manor site in eastern middle S1veden. Jo«r»al of Archaeological Science, Vol 35:3.Pp 773 78o. — Sandelin, S. &998.Hartser deras kemiska s In1n1ansattning och I unktion i det forhis- toriska grav- och boplatsmaterialet. CD-iippsatser i laborativ arkeologi 97798. The Archaeological Research Laboriitory. Stockholni: Stockholm University.

Slytå, K. k Arrhenius, B. i 979. Kemisk analys av organiskt material i lerkärl från Hallunda. Rapport frå &r Uniuersi tets Arkeologiska Forskni&igslabo- ratorium 3, r 979.The Archaeoli&gical Research Laboratory. Stockholm: Stock- holm Universitv.

Stjerna, IVI.-L. zoo7. I ö restä llni ngar o»r niat och ätande. Risk, kropp, identi tet och den "rfrågasatta" inateni vår tid. Avhandlingar från I'edagogiska institutionen r 4 I. Stockholm: Stockholms universitet. Sundström, L., Darmark, K. Lsc Stenbiick, N. (Fds. ). zoo6. Postboda z och r. Säsongs- br&platser med gropkerami k frå &i ö vergå &ige&i tidig&reoli tik l l»i-i&icllanneolitikrrnr i

norra Uppland. SAU Skri(ter I o. Uppsala: Societas Archaeologica Upsaliensis.

Syse, B.(Ed.). zooå. Uppland zooy. Årsbok tör medlemmarna I Upplands fornmin- nesforening och hembygdsforbund. Uppsala.

Welinder, S. r 998. Neoliticum-bronsålder, 39oo—Soo f Kr. In: Myrdal, J. (Ed.). Det suenska jordbrukets historia. Band r : jr&rdl&rirkets första femtusenå r. Stock- holm: Natur och Kultur. Ytterberg, N. zooé. Djurstugan. Uppl rnds forsta bönder. U V GAI.„Rapport zooy&8. Uppsala: Riksantikvarie imbetet, UV GAL.

CURRFNT Svvsoisrr ARCIIAEOLoov, VOL I 7, z009 149