Fifth Series Vol. XVI No. 56 Wednesday, May 31, 1972 Jyaistha 10, 1894 (Saka) DEBATES

(Fifth Series)

Vol. XVI

Fourth Session, 1972/1893-94 (Saka)

( Vol . XVI contains Nos . 51 — 57 )

LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT NEW DELHI CONTENTS

(Fifth Series, Vol. XVI, Fourth Session, 1972)

No. 56— Wednesday, May 31,1972/Jyaistka 10,1894 (Saka)

C o l u m n s

Member Sworn ...... j

Oral Answers to Questions— •Starred Questions Nos. 1063 to 1066, 1068 to 1072, 1074 and 1076 ... 1—31

Short Notice Question No. 6 ...... 31—44

Written Answers to Questions— Starred Questions Nos. 1061, 1062, 1067, 1073, 1075 and 1077 to 1080 ...... 44 —49

Unstarred Questions Nos. 8038 to 8226 ...... 49—184

Correction of Answer to USQ No. 4953 dated December 16, 1970— re : Use of Staff car in Civil Defence Organisation in Delhi ... 184—85

R e : Question of Privilege (Querry) ...... 185— 91

Papers laid on the Table ...... 191— 200

Financial Committees— A Review ...... 200

Messages from ...... 200— 01

Assent to Bills ...... 201

Committee on Public Undertakings— Twenty-Second Report and Minutes ...... 201— 02

Committee oh the Welfare of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes— Eighth* Ninth and Tenth Reports ...... 202

Joint Committee on Offices of Profit— Second Report ...... 203

Bill Introduced— (i) Disturbed Areas (Special Courts) Bill...... 203

(10 Criminal Law (Amendment) Bill...... 203—08

•The sign-{-marked above the name of a Member indicates that the question was actually asked on the floor of the House by that Member. («)

Co l u m n s

Hire Purchase Bill— Motion to consider, as passed by Rajya Sabha 204— 44

Shri 204— 12, 221— 26, 239—41 Shri Sarjoo Pandey 212— 14 Shri B. R. Krishnan in 214— 17 Shri Phool Chand Verma ... 217— 19 Shri Nitiraj Singh Chaudhary 219—21,228—29

Clauses 2 to 31 and 1

Motion to Pass ...... 244

jarh Muslim University (Amendment) Bill—

Motion to Consider ...... 244—51 Prof. S. Nurul Hasan 245—51

ition R e : Allegation of Publication of Large Number of Posters by a Company in Violation of Company Law ... 251-378

Shri Jyotirmoy Bosu ...... 251—68 Shri Priya Ranjan Das Munsi ...... 269—76, 360—71 Shri Indrajit Gupta ...... 276—84 Shri K. P. Unnikrishnan ...... 284—90 Shri G. Viswanathan ...... 290—93 Shri VidyaCharan Shukla ...... 294—98 Shri ...... 298—304 Dr. Henry Austin ... 304—06 Shri Shyamnandan Mishra ... 306— 11 Shri R. K. Sinha ...... 311— 14 Shri Surendra Mohanty ...... 314-17 Shri P. ft. Deo ...... 319—21 Shri Madhu Dandavate ...... 321—25 Shri C. M. Stephen — ... 325—36 Shri S. A. Shamim ...... 336—39 Shri R. S. Pandey ...... 346—50 Shri Raghunatha Reddy ...... 354— 60 LOK SABHA DEBATES i 2

L O K SABHA Sff TT f^TTT far fa S fc rw l % xre$ij syjTm ? Wednesday, M ay 31, 1972iJyaistha 10, 1894 {Saka) SHRIMATI NANDINI SATPATHY: No, Sir ; we do not propose to stop playing of National Anthem in cinema houses. It The Lok Sabha met at Eleven o f the Clock is not a fact that the National Anthem was not shown proper respect in the cinema [Mr. Speaker in the Chair] houses. In fact, during the course of these few years, this has become a habit with the people. People have got accustomed to this MEMBER SWORN thing and they are standing up and showing proper respect. Maybe in certain cases, Shri Arvindkumar Mohanlal Patel (Rajkot) some people are not showing proper respect. That does not mean that we should stop play- ORAL ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS ing the National Anthem. That means they will never get a chance to learn it. Playing of National Anthem in Cinema Houses «rt ijtsfcr : 5 m w n | f a *1063 SHRI SUKHDEO PRASAD % aft 37T? ft*! I ^ ^ 11 VERMA : Will the Minister of INFORMA- qpt ari?T tit | f a TION AND BROADCASTING be pleased to slate : m irpr S W t ZT«nf^cr for?TT $ I *T?fV (a) whether the playing of the National Anthem in Cinema Houses is being stopped ; vr Tf*rr t fa fr^» smw f a m i and % i $ *njjqT f a tfeft in jto r &ni q * annc fa%*TT *PT faftSFT w tTT (h) if so, the reasons thereof ? I THE MINISTER OF STATE IN THE MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND « r« w : srtt arnr | f a BROADCASTING (SHRIMATI NANDINI SATPATHY) : (a) No, Sir. iRit »r$tar ?rar *T? (b) The question docs not arise vft qml* surra «nrf : f fa gwfcr smnr : ars m fPTW^fT 11 Srfasr m 3TJ1W # srr«T% mssnr % w ft ft 3t?*ht t fa 8xicfto uratit ?T%rfT g f y &Ttit ^TcT tit W ttT T t «nff % i | fa %%nnrcf 3 Tjegta h r ^ctt | enr -m tit JT«ftf^cr fas*

sft auns : f s pr I do not know whether there are any instances where this is not followed. After all, the err 3TT?rr f i firtrcr ?T^r *r *t cinema houses come under the jurisdiction ?3Tl| 3TTtT fa^TT *TUT?f r?frf?5tT of the State Governments. Already, a number of times the State Governments and fo spl'ft-TTTS % ar^^TcT 3?T*t aftsRT the Chief Secretaries of different States were * * ? ...... requested to look into this aspect. We will request them again to look into it. wsmff : «PTT 3TTT