DOCSLIB.ORG

Bus/Rail Integration Plan for Ala Moana Center Station Final

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bus/Rail Integration Plan for Ala Moana Center Station Final Bus/Rail Integration Plan for Ala Moana Center Station Final April 2014 Prepared for: Honolulu Authority for Rapid Transportation Table of Contents 1 Introduction........................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Purpose of Bus/Rail Integration Plans ....................................................... 1 1.3 Basis for Bus/Rail Integration Plans ........................................................... 2 1.4 Contents of Bus/Rail Integration Plans ...................................................... 2 1.5 Monitoring of Factors Affecting Bus/Rail Integration Plans ........................ 3 1.6 Direction for Planning and Design of Bus Facilities ................................... 3 2 Bus/Rail Integration Plan Overview for Ala Moana Center Station ....................... 6 2.1 Factors Affecting the AMC Bus/Rail Integration Plan................................. 6 2.2 Characteristics of AMC Station Area.......................................................... 8 3 Bus Networks Serving Ala Moana Center Station ................................................ 9 3.1 Current Bus Network in AMC Station Area ................................................ 9 3.2 Planned Bus Network in AMC Station Area ............................................... 9 3.3 Bus Route Changes from Project FEIS.................................................... 15 4 Recommended Bus Facilities at Ala Moana Center Station ............................... 21 4.1 Bus Services at AMC Station ................................................................... 21 4.1.1 Bus Services ............................................................................. 22 4.1.2 Other Operational Considerations ............................................ 26 4.2 Bus/Rail Integration Features .................................................................. 27 4.3 Bus Facilities in 2019/2030 ...................................................................... 36 4.3.1 All On-Street Bus Operations .................................................... 36 4.3.2 Off-Street and On-Street Bus Operations ................................. 37 4.3.3 Bus Staging Area ...................................................................... 39 4.4 Integration of Other Modes ...................................................................... 44 4.4.1 Pedestrian Access .................................................................... 44 4.4.2 Bike Sharing Facilities............................................................... 44 4.4.3 General-Purpose Vehicle Access ............................................. 45 4.5 Pedestrian Connections at AMC Station .................................................. 45 Appendix Appendix A—HHCTCP Design Criteria Chapter 6 Civil Final Bus/Rail Integration Plan for Ala Moana Center Station Page i Honolulu Rail Transit Project April 2014 Figures Figure 3-1: 2030 Bus Network Serving AMC Station..................................................... 12 Figure 3-2: Inset of 2030 Bus Network Serving AMC Station—WITHOUT Off-Street Transit Center Scenario ........................................................................... 13 Figure 3-3: Inset of 2030 Bus Network Serving AMC Station—WITH Off-Street Transit Center Scenario ........................................................................... 14 Figure 4-1: Ala Moana Station TheBus and TheHandi-Van Layout WITHOUT Proposed Off-Street Transit Center—2019/2030 ..................................... 32 Figure 4-2: Ala Moana Station TheBus and TheHandi-Van Layout WITH Proposed Off-Street Transit Center—2019/ 2030 .................................................... 33 Figure 4-3: Ala Moana Station TheBus and TheHandi-Van Layout WITHOUT Proposed Off-Street Transit Center—2019/2030 (enlargement of station entrance area).............................................................................. 34 Figure 4-4: Ala Moana Station TheBus and TheHandi-Van Layout WITH Proposed Off-Street Transit Center—2019/2030 (enlargement of station entrance area) ......................................................................................... 35 Figure 4-5: Proposed AMC Bus Staging Area Location ................................................ 40 Figure 4-6: Proposed Bus Staging Extension between Kona and Waimanu Streets ..................................................................................................... 43 Figure 4-7: Wayfinding Example at an LRT Stop (Portland, Oregon) ............................ 46 Tables Table 2-1: 2030 Daily Passenger Volumes at AMC Station by Route ............................. 7 Table 2-2: 2030 Daily Passenger Volumes by Mode of Access at Ala Moana Station........................................................................................................ 7 Table 3-1: Current and 2030 Bus Routes Serving AMC ................................................ 10 Table 3-2: Phasing of Bus Service at AMC Station ....................................................... 11 Table 3-3: 2030 Service Characteristics of Bus Routes at AMC Station ....................... 16 Table 3-4: 2030 Expected Bus Route Changes Compared to FEIS (Appendix D) ........ 18 Table 4-1: Ala Moana Center Station Bus Volumes by Year ......................................... 23 Table 4-2: Ala Moana Center Station Bus Operations in 2019/2030 WITHOUT Proposed Off-Street Transit Center ......................................................... 28 Table 4-3: Ala Moana Center Station Bus Operations in 2019/2030 WITH Proposed Off-Street Transit Center ......................................................... 30 Page ii Final Bus/Rail Integration Plan for Ala Moana Center Station April 2014 Honolulu Rail Transit Project Acronyms and Abbreviations ADA Americans with Disabilities Act AMC Ala Moana Center DPP Department of Planning and Permitting, City and County of Honolulu DTS Department of Transportation Services, City and County of Honolulu EB Eastbound ‘Ewa toward the west FEIS Final Environmental Impact Statement FTA Federal Transportation Administration GEC General Engineering Contract GGP General Growth Properties HART Honolulu Authority for Rapid Transportation KHSG Kamehameha Highway Station Group Koko Head toward Diamond Head/east LCC Leeward Community College makai toward the sea mauka toward the mountains NB northbound NEX Navy Exchange Shuttle ORTP 2Ӂahu Regional Transportation Plan OTS 2ދahu Transit Services Project Honolulu Rail Transit Project SB Southbound TDM Transportation Demand Management TOD transit-oriented development UH University of Hawai‘i WB Westbound WRCS WaikƯNƯ Regional Circular Study Final Bus/Rail Integration Plan for Ala Moana Center Station Page iii Honolulu Rail Transit Project April 2014 1 Introduction 1.1 Background The Honolulu Rail Transit Project (Project) involves a 20-mile rail line located between East Kapolei and Ala Moana Center with a total of 21 stations. The Honolulu Authority for Rapid Transportation (HART) of the City and County of Honolulu is responsible for the design, construction, and operations of the Project. Bus will play a very important role in the transit system. The Project travel demand forecasting model indicates at some rail stations, more than 70 percent of total daily riders will be connecting to or from buses. While the June 2010 Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) provided general bus requirements at each station, more detailed bus/rail integration plans will help guide final design and define on-street bus facility needs at each rail station. This bus/rail integration plan will provide station designers, public agencies, and other interested parties with guidance on the location of bus stops (both on- and off-street) near each rail station. Seamless integration of bus and rail service will help maximize the Project’s ability to meets its goals and objectives. 1.2 Purpose of Bus/Rail Integration Plans Bus/Rail integration plans are being prepared for each station design group— West O‘ahu, Farrington Highway, Kamehameha Highway, Airport, Dillingham, and Kaka‘ako. Although it is included in the Kaka‘ako Station Group, a separate report is being prepared for Ala Moana Center (AMC) Station because of its importance and complexity as a major transit hub. The integration plans for AMC and other rail stations are intended to provide information on bus access, including on- and off-street facilities as well as service characteristics of routes serving the stations. Key information items include: x Delineation of on- and off-street bus facilities in each station area, including types of stops (e.g., single or multiple bus bays). x Guidance and background information to HART, the Department of Trans- portation Services (DTS) of the City and County of Honolulu, and other interested parties for development and coordination of on-street stops. x Guidance to DTS and O‘ahu Transit Services (OTS) for operations planning of bus routes serving Project stations. Final Bus/Rail Integration Plan for Ala Moana Center Station Page 1 Honolulu Rail Transit Project April 2014 1.3 Basis for Bus/Rail Integration Plans Key steps for preparing bus/rail integration plans include the following: x Confirm the bus service plans serving each rail station, including operations which reflect the roadway systems that are expected to be in place during each phase of Project implementation. These
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kapālama Canal Catalytic Project
    KAPĀLAMA CANAL CATALYTIC PROJECT EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT OCTOBER 2016 2 • EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT - OCTOBER 2016 KAPĀLAMA CANAL CATALYTIC PROJECT Prepared by : with assistance from: KAPĀLAMA CANAL CATALYTIC PROJECT EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT - OCTOBER 2016 • 3 Table of Contents 1 Introduction 1.1 Project Background and Location 4 2 Site Analysis 2.1 General Observations 6 2.2 Nimitz Highway to Dillingham Boulevard 10 2.3 Dillingham Boulevard to North King Street 12 2.4 North King Street to the H-1 Freeway 15 2.5 The H-1 Freeway to Houghtailing Street 17 2.6 Bridges 18 2.7 Architecturally Significant Structures 20 3 Civil Study Areas 3.1 Flood Capacity and Channel Design 22 3.2 Utilities 23 3.3 Stormwater Runoff and Drainage 25 3.4 Water Quality and Pollutant Sources 26 3.5 Canal Management and Maintenance 26 3.6 Tides 27 3.7 Sea Level Rise and Climate Change 27 3.8 Bathymetric and Topographic Surveys 28 3.9 Design Standards 28 3.10 Ecology & Marine Resources 29 4 Related Planning Studies 4.1 Primary Urban Center Development Plan for 2025 30 4.2 Kalihi-Palāma Action Plan 31 4.3 Kalihi Neighborhood Transit-Oriented Development Plan 33 4.4 Kapālama Canal: A Conceptual Plan Study 36 5 Jurisdiction, Land Ownership, and Regulations 5.1 Jurisdiction 37 5.2 Landowners 37 5.3 Landowner Development Plans 38 5.4 Revised Ordinances of Honolulu 39 5.5 Chapter 343 Hawai‘i Revised Statutes 40 5.6 Land Use Considerations 41 5.7 Other Required Permits/Regulatory Approvals 42 6 Community Design 43 7 References 46 7.1 Civil References 47 Appendix A : Cultural and Historical Brief A-1 Appendix B : Community Stakeholders B-1 Appendix C : Geotechnical Work Plan C-1 4 • EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT - OCTOBER 2016 KAPĀLAMA CANAL CATALYTIC PROJECT 1 Introduction 1.1 Project Background & Location The Kapālama Canal Catalytic Project is based on various community plans supported by the City & County of Honolulu.
    [Show full text]
  • State TOD Planning & Implementation Project, Island of Oahu, Final
    State Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) Planning and Implementation Project for the Island of O‘ahu Prepared for: Office of Planning Department of Business, Economic Development and Tourism Prepared by: July 2020 State TOD Planning & Implementation Project, Island of O‘ahu Study Context and Potential Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic This report was drafted between December 2019 and July 2020, with reference to consultations, data collection, and analyses between the third quarter of 2018 and the first weeks of 2020. From approximately February 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic caused major economic, social, and business disruptions in Hawai‘i, as it did worldwide. At the time of this writing, little data exists on the pandemic’s impacts on development markets and financing, and the timing of recovery is uncertain. The development visions presented herein reflect the long-term goals and aspirations of public agencies and private parties anticipated for each TOD priority area. Many of the projects described would not be expected to materialize for years or even decades of this study. The assessments presented in this report are tied to future implementation of the desired projects, and while some could be delayed, for purposes of this study, it is assumed that in this longer-term framework, conditions affecting such development in Hawai‘i could have recovered to be within the range of outcomes described herein. Nevertheless, prior to implementation of any particular project or financial mechanism, as for any development, the conclusions presented herein should be reviewed in the context of current market, economic, fiscal, political, and social environments. State TOD Planning & Implementation Project, Island of O‘ahu Acknowledgments The contributions and assistance from the following departments, agencies, and stakeholders in the preparation of the State Transit-Oriented Development Planning and Implementation Project for the Island of O‘ahu are gratefully acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • City and County of Honolulu Department of Transportation Services Public Transit Division Title VI Program Report
    City and County of Honolulu Department of Transportation Services Public Transit Division Title VI Program Report Department of Transportation Services City and County of Honolulu June, 2015 DRAFT Department of Transportation Services Public Transit Division Title VI Program Report June 2015 Department of Transportation Services City and County of Honolulu 650 South King Street Honolulu, HI 96813 DRAFT TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND .................................................................................................... DTS-PTD Overview................................................................................................................. Public Transit System Description ........................................................................................... FTA and Title VI/EJ ...................................................................................................................... Public Transportation Accommodation .................................................................................... PART I: GENERAL REQUIREMENTS AND GUIDELINES ........................................................................ General Requirements ............................................................................................................ 1. Introduction .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • AE47810E0128 Metro
    JANUARY 2018 RFP No. AE47810E0128 Volume I – Technical Proposal (Appendices) Systems Engineering and Support Services Submitted by: Resumes Metro Systems Engineering and Support Services RFP No. AE47810E0128 TABLE OF CONTENTS Margaret (Meg) Cederoth, AICP, LEED AP | sustainability interface ....................................... R-49 Michael Harris-Gifford | program manager | corridor lead/ TO Andrew Cho | communications...................... R-50 manager | independent systems integration review team . R-1 Wilson Chu, EIT | ducktbank design .................. R-51 Jeff Goodling | deputy project manager | project controls lead | value engineering ............................ R-3 Joe Cochran | train control ......................... R-52 John Schnurbusch, PE | OCS manager ................ R-5 John Cockle, ASP | safety certification ................ R-53 Anh Le | communications manager | corridor lead/ TO Phil Collins | communications | independent systems manager ........................................ R-7 integration review team ............................ R-54 Barry Lemke | train control design lead................. R-9 Ramesh Daryani, PMP | systems integration . R-55 David Hetherington, PE | traction power manager ....... R-11 Ruperto Dilig, PE | independent quality manager ........ R-56 Davy Leung | RF engineering lead.................... R-13 Kurt Drummond, PE | communications................ R-57 Paul Mosier | operations and planning lead ............ R-15 Jeffrey Dugard | train control........................ R-58 Abbas Sizar,
    [Show full text]
  • State of Hawaii Strategic Plan for Transit-Oriented Development DRAFT
    State of Hawaii Strategic Plan for Transit-Oriented Development Hawaii Interagency Council for Transit-Oriented Development Prepared Pursuant to Act 130, Session Laws of Hawaii 2016 by Office of Planning And Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation Department of Business, Economic Development and Tourism State of Hawaii DRAFT October 2017 State Strategic Plan for Transit-Oriented/Transit-Ready Development—DRAFT PRINT DATE: 26-Oct-17 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 INTRODUCTION: A Framework for State Investments in Livable Communities ..................................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Precedents to the TOD Council ........................................................................................................ 1-2 1.3 TOD Council Perspectives on TOD and TRD ..................................................................................... 1-4 1.4 A State Vision for TOD and Directed Growth ................................................................................... 1-4 1.5 Key Principles for State Investments in Livable Communities ......................................................... 1-5 1.6 Opportunities for TOD/TRD in Promoting Smart Growth and Livable Communities .................... 1-11 1.7 Purpose and Structure of the Plan ................................................................................................. 1-11 2 State TOD/TRD Implementation
    [Show full text]
  • Global Report Global Metro Projects 2020.Qxp
    Table of Contents 1.1 Global Metrorail industry 2.2.2 Brazil 2.3.4.2 Changchun Urban Rail Transit 1.1.1 Overview 2.2.2.1 Belo Horizonte Metro 2.3.4.3 Chengdu Metro 1.1.2 Network and Station 2.2.2.2 Brasília Metro 2.3.4.4 Guangzhou Metro Development 2.2.2.3 Cariri Metro 2.3.4.5 Hefei Metro 1.1.3 Ridership 2.2.2.4 Fortaleza Rapid Transit Project 2.3.4.6 Hong Kong Mass Railway Transit 1.1.3 Rolling stock 2.2.2.5 Porto Alegre Metro 2.3.4.7 Jinan Metro 1.1.4 Signalling 2.2.2.6 Recife Metro 2.3.4.8 Nanchang Metro 1.1.5 Power and Tracks 2.2.2.7 Rio de Janeiro Metro 2.3.4.9 Nanjing Metro 1.1.6 Fare systems 2.2.2.8 Salvador Metro 2.3.4.10 Ningbo Rail Transit 1.1.7 Funding and financing 2.2.2.9 São Paulo Metro 2.3.4.11 Shanghai Metro 1.1.8 Project delivery models 2.3.4.12 Shenzhen Metro 1.1.9 Key trends and developments 2.2.3 Chile 2.3.4.13 Suzhou Metro 2.2.3.1 Santiago Metro 2.3.4.14 Ürümqi Metro 1.2 Opportunities and Outlook 2.2.3.2 Valparaiso Metro 2.3.4.15 Wuhan Metro 1.2.1 Growth drivers 1.2.2 Network expansion by 2025 2.2.4 Colombia 2.3.5 India 1.2.3 Network expansion by 2030 2.2.4.1 Barranquilla Metro 2.3.5.1 Agra Metro 1.2.4 Network expansion beyond 2.2.4.2 Bogotá Metro 2.3.5.2 Ahmedabad-Gandhinagar Metro 2030 2.2.4.3 Medellín Metro 2.3.5.3 Bengaluru Metro 1.2.5 Rolling stock procurement and 2.3.5.4 Bhopal Metro refurbishment 2.2.5 Dominican Republic 2.3.5.5 Chennai Metro 1.2.6 Fare system upgrades and 2.2.5.1 Santo Domingo Metro 2.3.5.6 Hyderabad Metro Rail innovation 2.3.5.7 Jaipur Metro Rail 1.2.7 Signalling technology 2.2.6 Ecuador
    [Show full text]
  • Office of the Mayor City and County of Honolulu
    OFFICE OF THE MAYOR CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU 530 SOUTH KING STREET. ROOM 300 • HONOLULU, HAWAII 96813 PHONE: (808) 7684141 • FAX: (808) 768-4242 • INTERNET: www.honolulu.ciov KIRK CALDWELL ROY K. AMEMIYA. JR. MAYOR MANAGING DIRECTOR GEORGETTE T. DEEMER DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR TESTIMONY OF KIRK CALDWELL, MAYOR CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU BEFORE THE HOUSE COMMITTEE ON FINANCE AND THE SENATE COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS FRIDAY, JANUARY 19, 2018 1:30 PM TO: THE HONORABLE SYLVIA J. LUKE, CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE COMMITTEE ON FINANCE THE HONORABLE DONOVAN M. DELA CRUZ, CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE SENATE COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS Thank you for allowing me to present testimony today. The City and County of Honolulu continues to make solid progress on our priorities. Roads. We have repaved the city roads that were deemed substandard. In FY2OI 7, the City paved 430 lane miles for a total of 1,558 lane miles since January 1, 2013. In FY2O1 7, we met and surpassed our target of repaving 1,500 lane miles since January 1,2013. Parks. As part of our Kakou for the Parks program, in FY2OI 7, the City renovated 21 comfort stations, refurbished 15 play apparatuses, and resurfaced 46 play courts at 12 parks across Oahu. We improved park security by installing surveillance cameras at Ala Moana Regional Park, Kaiaka Beach Park, and Sandy Beach Park. We also installed a new irrigation system and began construction of new sand volleyball courts at Ala Moana Regional Park. The City replenished or fortified beaches in Kailua, Ala Moana, and Nanakuli, and finished several large-scale park facility improvements in Aiea, Hauula, Kaimuki, Wahiawa, Makihi, and Waimanalo.
    [Show full text]
  • The Following Documentation Is an Electronically‐ Submitted Vendor
    The following documentation is an electronically‐ submitted vendor response to an advertised solicitation from the West Virginia Purchasing Bulletin within the Vendor Self‐Service portal at wvOASIS.gov. As part of the State of West Virginia’s procurement process, and to maintain the transparency of the bid‐opening process, this documentation submitted online is publicly posted by the West Virginia Purchasing Division at WVPurchasing.gov with any other vendor responses to this solicitation submitted to the Purchasing Division in hard copy format. Purchasing Division State of West Virginia 2019 Washington Street East Solicitation Response Post Office Box 50130 Charleston, WV 25305-0130 Proc Folder : 522404 Solicitation Description : Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan Proc Type : Central Master Agreement Date issued Solicitation Closes Solicitation Response Version 2019-01-23 SR 0805 ESR01231900000003378 1 13:30:00 VENDOR VS0000013500 TRANSPORTATION RESOURCE ASSOCIATES INC Solicitation Number: CRFQ 0805 PTR1900000004 Total Bid : $0.00 Response Date: 2019-01-23 Response Time: 12:05:25 Comments: FOR INFORMATION CONTACT THE BUYER Michelle L Childers (304) 558-2063 [email protected] Signature on File FEIN # DATE All offers subject to all terms and conditions contained in this solicitation Page : 1 FORM ID : WV-PRC-SR-001 Line Comm Ln Desc Qty Unit Issue Unit Price Ln Total Or Contract Amount 1 Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan Comm Code Manufacturer Specification Model # 94131503 Extended Description : Vendor MUST complete the ATTACHED Pricing Page, Exhibit A. If bidding electronically, vendor is to put $0.00 on the commodity line in WVOasis, complete the Excel pricing page, and upload into WVOasis as an attachment.
    [Show full text]
  • Bus/Rail Integration Plan for the Kakaako Station Group
    Bus/Rail Integration Plan for the Kaka‘ako Station Group Final April 2014 Prepared for: Honolulu Authority for Rapid Transportation Table of Contents 1 Introduction........................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Purpose of Bus/Rail Integration Plans ....................................................... 1 1.3 Basis for Bus/Rail Integration Plans ........................................................... 2 1.4 Contents of Bus/Rail Integration Plans ...................................................... 2 1.5 Monitoring of Factors Affecting Bus/Rail Integration Plans ........................ 3 1.6 Direction for Planning and Design of Bus Intermodal Facilities .................. 3 1.7 Direction for Planning and Design of Non-Bus Intermodal Facilities .......... 4 2 Bus/Rail Integration Plan Overview for the Kaka‘ako Station Group ................... 7 2.1 Factors Affecting the KSG Bus/Rail Integration Plan ................................. 7 3 Bus Networks Serving KSG Stations .................................................................. 10 3.1 Current Bus Network in the KSG ............................................................. 10 3.2 Planned Bus Network in KHSG Station Areas ......................................... 11 3.3 Bus Route Changes from FEIS ................................................................ 17 4 Recommended Bus Facilities at
    [Show full text]
  • Global Mass Transit Report Information and Analysis on the Global Mass Transit Industry
    NOVEMBER 2009 VOLUME I, ISSUE 1 Global Mass Transit Report Information and analysis on the global mass transit industry Contactless Ticketing in Mass Transit Mass Transit in South Africa A win-win solution for all stakeholders Governments invest heavily in transport infrastructure ith its myriad of advantages such as lower transaction costs, faster transaction speeds and multi-functionality, W s governments around the world acknowledge the contactless smart ticketing is the future of the global mass- important role that public transport plays in improving the transportation industry. Already operational in key metropolitan A quality of life, there is a global trend for increased investment in areas such as Hong Kong, London, Seoul, Washington D.C. and this important infrastructure sector. A commitment to upgrade Shanghai, contactless smart ticketing offers a win-win solution and expand mass transit systems has risen across the Americas, for transit operators and users, contactless technology developers Europe, Asia, and now in Africa as well. Taking the lead in Africa and financial institutions. is its biggest economy South Africa. Today, virtually all transit-fare payment systems in the For many years, South Africa boasted of the best transport delivery and procurement stages are opting for contactless infrastructure in the African continent. However, over the last ticketing as the primary medium. India’s Mumbai metro, which few years the transport infrastructure has been deteriorating. This is expected to become operational in 2011, will be equipped with is essentially owing to short sightedness and lack of continued a system based on contactless technology with reusable smart investment. It is only now that the transport sector has begun tickets.
    [Show full text]
  • September 28, 2018 REQUEST for PROPOSALS NO. RFP-HRT
    REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. RFP‐HRT‐1900055 HONOLULU AUTHORITY FOR RAPID TRANSPORTATION HONOLULU RAIL TRANSIT PROJECT CITY CENTER GUIDEWAY AND STATIONS/PEARL HIGHLANDS DESIGN‐BUILD FINANCE OPERATE AND MAINTAIN CONTRACT REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS PART 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS 1.1 Instructions to Offerors (ITO) 1.2 ITO Exhibits 1.2.01 Exhibit 1 Offeror's Clarification Request 1.2.02 Exhibit 2 Proposal Format 1.2.03 Exhibit 3 Acknowledgement of Receipt for Request for Proposals and Addenda 1.2.04 Exhibit 4 Proposal Form 1.2.05 Exhibit 5 Offeror's Organization Information 1.2.06 Exhibit 6 Project Participant Form 1.2.07 Exhibit 7 Offeror / Project Participant Certification 1.2.08 Exhibit 8 Reference Project Experience 1.2.09 Exhibit 9 Subcontractor Information 1.2.10 Exhibit 10 Past Performance Form 1.2.11 Exhibit 11 Safety Questionnaire 1.2.12 Exhibit 12 Equity Member Experience 1.2.13 Exhibit 13 Financial Officer’s Certificate 1.2.14 Exhibit 14 Reserved 1.2.15 Exhibit 15 Certification Regarding Lobbying 1.2.16 Exhibit 16 Certification Regarding Conflict of Interest 1.2.17 Exhibit 17 Certificate Regarding Ineligible Contractor September 28, 2018 1.2.18 Exhibit 18 Certificate Regarding Ineligible Subcontractor 1.2.19 Exhibit 19 Notice of Intent to Bid 1.3 Draft Summaries of Work 1.3.01 Draft City Center Summary of Work 1.3.02 Draft Pearl Highlands Summary of Work 1.3.03 Draft Core Systems Summary of Work 2.0 CITY CENTER REFERENCE MATERIALS 2.01 City Center Guideway Conceptual Drawings 2.02 Kalihi Station Conceptual Drawings 2.03 Kapalama Station Conceptual Drawings 2.04 Iwilei Station Conceptual Drawings 2.05 Chinatown Station Conceptual Drawings 2.06 Downtown Station Conceptual Drawings 2.07 Civic Center Station Conceptual Drawings 2.08 Kaka'ako Station Conceptual Drawings 2.09 Ala Moana Center Station Conceptual Drawings 2.10 City Center Geotechnical Data Reports 2.10.01 Geotechnical Data Report, HRTP City Center Section Utilities and Guideway: Middle Street to Ala Moana Center, Volume 1 ‐ Bent 637 to Bent 689, Rev.
    [Show full text]
  • Icomera to Provide Dynamic Passenger Wi-Fi Solution for the Honolulu Rail Transit Project
    Press release 08th October 2020 Icomera to provide Dynamic Passenger Wi-Fi Solution for the Honolulu Rail Transit Project ENGIE, through its subsidiary Icomera, is the world’s leading provider of wireless Internet connectivity for public transport. ENGIE is a world leading group that provides low-carbon energy and services, and has been working from its office in Honolulu for over a decade to help customers decarbonize, decentralize and digitalize their operations. Icomera has been awarded the contract to deliver high-speed Passenger Wi-Fi for the Honolulu Rail Transit Project, an elevated light rail system currently under construction in the City and County of Honolulu, O‘ahu, Hawai‘i. Icomera’s mobile connectivity solution will be deployed via its next-generation X5 mobile application and communications gateways, which will be installed on board 80 Hitachi train cars by early 2021. Empowering riders to stay connected, whether traveling for work or leisure, the X5 will deliver high- performance mobile Internet connectivity that will also meet and exceed passengers’ growing data transfer demands. Supported by a powerful suite of cloud-based management tools, the X-Series platform is capable of integrating a wide range of other Internet-enabled applications over time, giving the Honolulu Authority for Rapid Transportation (HART) a technological foundation to build a fully realized “digital train” of the future. This capacity to further customize the initial Wi-Fi roll-out adds to the solution’s overall ROI. Andrew Robbins, CEO of HART, shared, “We are pleased to be working together with the ENGIE and Icomera team to provide direct solutions that meet passengers’ expectations to stay digitally accessible and connected on the go.
    [Show full text]