Hurricane Forecasting in Canada: a partnership between research and operations
J.D. Abraham Director General Weather and Environmental Monitoring Meteorological Service of Canada
IWET IV May 24 2012
Creation and evolution of the CHC: 25th Anniversary
September 25-28, 1985 – Hurricane Gloria affected the Maritime provinces. Canadians had to rely largely on U.S. forecasts concerning this intense storm. When the storm's effects on Canada were much less than predicted, there was considerable confusion in the media and the general public. This eventually lead to the creation of the CHC.
1980’s CNN – Growth in cable news and live coverage August 31, 1987 – Environment Canada established hurricane centres on each coast: at the then Maritimes Weather Centre (Bedford, N.S.), and at the then Pacific Weather Centre (Vancouver, B.C.). 2000 – The Canadian Hurricane Centre was established in Dartmouth, N.S., to serve all of Canada.
Canadian Hurricane Centre Ops
1987: First hurricane forecasting specialists were identified: Jim Abraham, Peter Bowyer, Al MacAfee, Ken MacDonald, John Merrick
CHC issues first bulletins on Hurricane Emily
1989: First Environment Canada meteorologist attends the WMO-NHC Hurricane Workshop
1991: First hurricane-forecasting training delivered in Canada by a U.S. National Hurricane Centre specialist (Hal Gerrish)
1994: Development and implementation of hurricane workstation software that prepares tracks and bulletins (Al MacAfee)
TC (not ET) Training
4
ET: a collaborative R&D and forecaster challenge
1989: Tropical Storm Hugo hits Ontario; this storm marks the first time Doppler images of a tropical cyclone are captured over Canada: Paul Joe
1993: First CHC member attends the International Workshop on Tropical Cyclones (IWTC-III, Mexico)
1996 McGill University: Peter Yau and John Gyakum 1998: IWTC-IV Haikou : Special session on ET 1999: IWET I: Kaufbeuren DE (Sarah Jones and Roger Smith) 1999: AEPRI 2001: COMET partnership established 2003: IWET II and Hurricane Juan Halifax NS 2004: National Lab in each Storm Prediction Centre 2005: IWET III Perth AU 2012: IWET IV Montreal QC
6
.
Our knowledge and understanding of extratropical transition could be enhanced through a field
First International Workshop on Extratropical Transition Kaufbeuren, Germany, 10 - 14 May 1999
experiment with Intensive Observation Periods. Scientific objectives must be developed for such an experiment. The possibility of using existing resources should be considered, e.g. WWRP/WMO and Typhoon Committee in the Pacific, USWRP and the HRD field programme in the Atlantic. The participation of both forecasters and researchers is essential for the success of a field programme.
Outcome: Improved understanding, and better prediction through:
– Knowledge transfer (training and development, conceptual models, techniques)
– Technology transfer (numerical models, tools) – Data (aircraft, remote sensing, impacts)
Training: COMET Courses and Modules
Parametric Wind and Wave modeling
HURRICANE
LUIS
Wave Field at Sept.11 - 01Z
Sept. 10-11, 1995
11 / 06Z
105 knots
2
Max Reported Sig. Waves 17+ metres
3
QEII
11 / 00Z
*
95 knots
4
10 / 18Z
5
10
85 knots
6
9
10 / 12Z
85 knots
7
8
10 / 06Z
85 knots
Numerical Weather Prediction
• Coupled Modeling strategies • Ocean and atmospheric data assimilation • High resolution simulations • Vortex insertions
• Improved operational modeling suite
12
Storm surge prediction and water level alert system
• The first project to be brought to fruition through
AEPRI, with collaborators:
• Natacha Bernier, Janya Humble, Josko Bobanovic
and Keith Thompson (Dal)
• George Parkes, Serge Desjardins, and Al MacAfee
(MTs, MSC - Atlantic)
13
Storm Surge Prediction System
• Predicts sea level changes caused by weather systems • Based on Dal coastal ocean model • Driven by CMC regional forecast model surface pressures and winds
• Alerts forecasters of flooding risk from combination of
high tide and large surge
14
The January 21st 2000 Storm
• Powerful storm hit
Maritimes
• Significant flooding in Charlottetown
• Successful prediction by forecast model
• Forecast
“Helene” barotropic waves
Numerical Simulation
Large Atmospheric Computation on the Earth Simulator
• 40 clusters of 16 full SX-6 nodes • 8 vector processors per node Total 5120 PEs • Peak performance 40 Tflops/sec • Memory: 16 Gbytes/node Total: 10 TB • NEC IXS Xbar Interconnec
Collaboration
- RPN:
- ESC:
- McGill University:
Michel Desgagné
Gilbert Brunet Robert Benoit Claude Girard Pierre Pellerin
Michel Valin
- Wataru Ohfuchi
- Peter Yau
John Gyakum
Ron McTaggart-Cowan
Yosvany Martinez
CSU:
Mike Montgomery
LACES: A Grand Challenge project on the Earth Simulator
964 hPa
ET Phase
985 hPa
Modelling the Full Lifecycle of
Hurricane Earl (Sept 1998) at 1km Resolution with the Canadian MC2 Model
Tropical Phase Class2 Hurricane
September 1998: Classified as a very active TC period
Observations
•Doppler Radar •Additional buoys •Aircraft flights CV580
• Michael 2000 • Karen 2001 • Isabel and Juan 2003 • Ophelia 2006
•Synthetic Aperture Radar
Hugo through King City radar 1989
21
Bouys: Trapped Fetch Resonant Waves
Defense Research: AXBT/AXCTD “Michael”
Aircraft Investigations
Cross-section of wind speeds
Key findings from the flights
• Highly asymmetric wind field • Deep wind region again on right-hand side (as in Michael 2000) • Drying-out above 900 mb (1000 m) on south side • Tilted eyewall - stadium effect or ET tilt? • High degree of variability in wind profiles in different sectors of the storm:
• Near 50% wind reduction in BL on east side outside RMW
• Near 20% (only) wind reduction near RMW and on south side
(downward momentum mixing more efficient; BL rolls seen in doppler may be helping?)
• This has significant implications for wind forecasting
• Challenges: • Isabel (GPS) winds, icing buildup • Juan some lingering GPS issues in high wind region
Another opportunistic SAR scan capturing wind field early in the ET process
Page 27
CHC Outcomes
• Very good relationship with research community and other operational centres (facilitated by WMO TMP, National Marine Lab and a wonderful TC community)
• Trained and motivated forecasters • Credibility with Canadian media and public
• Demonstrated public response to protect lives and property