DOCSLIB.ORG

Transportation Impact Study Proposed Residential Development 22-28 Ann Street & 78 Park Street East, Port Credit City of Mississauga

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Transportation Impact Study Proposed Residential Development 22-28 Ann Street & 78 Park Street East, Port Credit City of Mississauga TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT 22-28 ANN STREET & 78 PARK STREET EAST, PORT CREDIT CITY OF MISSISSAUGA April 2019 19244 Disclaimer This Report represents the work of LEA Consulting Ltd (“LEA”). This Report may not be relied upon for detailed implementation or any other purpose not specifically identified within this Report. This Document is confidential and prepared solely for the use of Edenshaw Ann Developments Ltd. Neither LEA, its sub-consultants nor their respective employees assume any liability for any reason, including, but not limited to, negligence, to any party other than Edenshaw Ann Developments Ltd. for any information or representation herein. Transportation Impact Study Proposed Residential Development 22- 28 Ann Street & 78 Park Street East, City of Mississauga TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 1 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................................................................ 3 Transit Network ............................................................................................................................... 3 Existing Cycling Network .................................................................................................................. 4 Pedestrian Network ......................................................................................................................... 6 Street Network ................................................................................................................................. 6 Existing Traffic Data Collection ........................................................................................................ 8 Intersection Capacity Analysis ......................................................................................................... 8 3 FUTURE BACKGROUND TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ........................................................................ 13 Background Developments ............................................................................................................ 13 Corridor Growth ............................................................................................................................. 15 Road Network Improvements ........................................................................................................ 15 Intersection Capacity Analysis (2023) ............................................................................................ 15 Intersection Capacity Analysis (2031) ............................................................................................ 20 4 SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC ..................................................................................................... 26 Modal Split ..................................................................................................................................... 26 Trip Generation .............................................................................................................................. 27 4.2.1 Site Auto Trips - 2023 .......................................................................................................... 27 4.2.2 Site Auto Trips - 2031 .......................................................................................................... 27 Trip Distribution and Assignment .................................................................................................. 28 5 FUTURE TOTAL TRAFFIC CONDITIONS .................................................................................... 31 Intersection Capacity Analysis (2023) ............................................................................................ 31 Intersection Capacity Analysis (2031) ............................................................................................ 36 6 TRAVEL DEMAND MANAGEMENT .......................................................................................... 41 7 VEHICULAR PARKING REVIEW ............................................................................................... 42 Automobile Parking ....................................................................................................................... 42 7.1.1 Literature Review ................................................................................................................ 43 7.1.2 Supporting Facilities ............................................................................................................ 44 7.1.3 Comparable Developments ................................................................................................ 46 7.1.4 Visitor Parking ..................................................................................................................... 46 7.1.5 Summary ............................................................................................................................. 47 Bicycle Parking ............................................................................................................................... 48 8 LOADING REVIEW ................................................................................................................. 49 9 CONCLUSIONS ...................................................................................................................... 50 Transportation Impact Study Proposed Residential Development 22- 28 Ann Street & 78 Park Street East, City of Mississauga LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Site Location (Image: Google Maps) ............................................................................................................... 1 Figure 2: Proposed Site Plan .......................................................................................................................................... 2 Figure 3: Existing Transit Network ................................................................................................................................. 3 Figure 4: Existing Cycling Network ................................................................................................................................. 5 Figure 5: Future Cycling Network .................................................................................................................................. 5 Figure 6: Existing Lane Configurations ........................................................................................................................... 7 Figure 7: Existing Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ................................................................................................................ 9 Figure 8: Proposed and Planned Developments (2031) .............................................................................................. 14 Figure 9: Future Background (2023) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ................................................................................ 16 Figure 10: Future Background (2031) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes .............................................................................. 21 Figure 11: Site Generated Traffic (2023) ..................................................................................................................... 29 Figure 12: Site Generated Traffic (2031) ..................................................................................................................... 30 Figure 13: Future Total (2023) Traffic .......................................................................................................................... 32 Figure 14: Future Total (2031) Traffic .......................................................................................................................... 37 Figure 15: 22 Ann Street Walk Score (Source: Walkscore.com) .................................................................................. 45 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Proposed Site Statistics .................................................................................................................................... 2 Table 2: Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis – Existing Weekday AM ................................................................ 10 Table 3: Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis – Existing Weekday PM ................................................................ 11 Table 4: Existing Capacity Analysis – Unsignalized Intersections ................................................................................ 12 Table 5: Background Developments ............................................................................................................................ 13 Table 6: Site Statistics – Planned Developments (2031) .............................................................................................. 14 Table 7: Corridor Growth Rates ................................................................................................................................... 15 Table 8: Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis – Future Background (2023) Weekday AM .................................. 17 Table 9: Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis – Future Background (2023) Weekday PM .................................. 18 Table 10: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis – Future Background (2023) .................................................. 18 Table 11: Hurontario/Park Street Capacity Analysis – Future Background (2023) Weekday AM (Improved)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Regional Express Rail Update
    Clause 5 in Report No. 10 of Committee of the Whole was adopted by the Council of The Regional Municipality of York at its meeting held on June 23, 2016 with the following additional recommendation: 3. Receipt of the memorandum from Daniel Kostopoulos, Commissioner of Transportation Services, dated June 22, 2016. 5 Regional Express Rail Update Committee of the Whole recommends adoption of the following recommendations contained in the report dated June 1, 2016 from the Commissioner of Transportation Services: 1. Metrolinx be requested to mitigate the impacts of Regional Express Rail service by addressing the gap between their Initial Business Case for Regional Express Rail and York Region’s needs for grade separations, additional GO stations and parking charges. 2. The Regional Clerk circulate this report to Metrolinx, Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Clerks of the local municipalities. Report dated June 1, 2016 from the Commissioner of Transportation Services now follows: 1. Recommendations It is recommended that: 1. Metrolinx be requested to mitigate the impacts of Regional Express Rail service by addressing the gap between their Initial Business Case for Regional Express Rail and York Region’s needs for grade separations, additional GO stations and parking charges. 2. The Regional Clerk circulate this report to Metrolinx, Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Clerks of the local municipalities. Committee of the Whole 1 June 9, 2016 Regional Express Rail Update 2. Purpose This report provides an update to Council on the Provincial Regional Express Rail (RER) Service Plan and associated staff activities as York Region’s response to the RER Service Plan to be implemented by the Province over the next 10 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Ontario Partners with Business to Build New Etobicoke GO Station Improving the Transit Experience and Making Life Easier for Ontarians October 25, 2018 8:00 A.M
    NEWS Ministry of Transportation Ontario Partners with Business to Build New Etobicoke GO Station Improving the transit experience and making life easier for Ontarians October 25, 2018 8:00 A.M. TORONTO — Ontario's Government for the People is keeping its promise to build transit and make Ontario open for business by working with the private sector to build commuters a new, modern station at Mimico GO. This station is the product of a new kind of partnership. This project will optimize the use of government-owned land and increase transit ridership by building a new development along an existing transit line. We are improving the transit experience and making life easier for Ontarians. Today John Yakabuski, Minister of Transportation, Steve Clark, Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, Kinga Surma, Parliamentary Assistant to the Minister of Transportation, Christine Hogarth, MPP, Etobicoke-Lakeshore, and Phil Verster, President and CEO, Metrolinx, visited the Mimico GO Station to announce that Ontario had signed a non-binding Letter of Intent with Vandyk Group of Companies. Metrolinx and Vandyk will negotiate the construction of a new Mimico GO Station. "We are making it easier for people commuting in the GTHA," said Minister Yakabuski. "The new station we are building at Mimico is part of our plan to improve service on the Lakeshore West line to every 15 minutes or better. By working with businesses to develop this site, we are delivering on our promise that Ontario is open for business, while we get this work done at a lower cost to the taxpayer." The new Mimico GO Station will include a new, accessible station building, pedestrian tunnels and elevators, refurbished platforms and new entrances to the station and below grade parking.
    [Show full text]
  • 95% Draft Final Environmental Project Report
    Park Lawn GO Station DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT REPORT AUGUST 2021 First Capital - Park Lawn GO Station 95% Draft Final Environmental Project Report First Capital Park Lawn GO Station 95% Draft Final Environmental Project Report Draft Final 2021-08-27 E Izabela Jasiak Mark Armstrong Melissa Alexander Report 2021-06-04 D Rachel Eagles Mark Armstrong Melissa Alexander Draft Report 2021-04-21 C Rachel Eagles Mark Armstrong Melissa Alexander Draft Report Date Rev. Prepared By Checked By Approved By Status 360807-H-EV-PLG-RPT-EP-0002, Rev. E Page i © Hatch 2021 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents. First Capital - Park Lawn GO Station 95% Draft Final Environmental Project Report Executive Summary ES Section 1- Introduction and Project Overview First Capital (Park Lawn) Corporation (FCR) has proposed the new Park Lawn GO Station to be developed in partnership with Metrolinx, located at the north end of 2150 Lake Shore Boulevard West in the City of Toronto (“the Project”). Hatch was retained by FCR to undertake an Environmental Assessment (EA) for the proposed Park Lawn GO Station on the Lakeshore West rail corridor. The evaluation of environmental impacts of the proposed Park Lawn GO Station has been carried out in accordance with the Transit Project Assessment Process (TPAP). The TPAP is regulated by the Environmental Assessment Act (EAA) under Ontario Regulation 231/08 - Transit Projects and Metrolinx Undertakings (O. Reg. 231/08). The purpose of the TPAP is to ensure effects associated with the Project are clearly identified and mitigated to the greatest extent feasible.
    [Show full text]
  • (BRES) and Successful Integration of Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) May 24, 2016
    Bolton Residential Expansion Study (BRES) and Successful Integration of Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) May 24, 2016 The purpose of this memorandum is to review the professional literature pertaining to the potential develop- ment of a Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) in the Bolton Residential Expansion Study area, in response to the Region of Peel’s recent release of the Discussion Paper. The Discussion Paper includes the establishment of evaluation themes and criteria, which are based on provincial and regional polices, stakeholder and public comments. It should be noted that while the Discussion Paper and the Region’s development of criteria does not specifi- cally advocate for TOD, it is the intent of this memorandum to illustrate that TOD-centric planning will not only adequately address such criteria, but will also complement and enhance the Region’s planning principles, key points and/or themes found in stakeholder and public comments. In the following are research findings related to TOD generally, and specifically, theMetrolinx Mobility Hub Guidelines For The Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area (September 2011) objectives. Additionally, following a review and assessment of the “Response to Comments Submitted on the Bolton Residential Expansion Study ROPA” submission prepared by SGL Planning & Design Inc. (March 15, 2016), this memorandum evaluates some of the key arguments and assumptions made in this submission relative to the TOD research findings. Planning for Transit-Oriented Developments TOD policy and programs can result in catalytic development that creates walkable, livable neighborhoods around transit providing economic, livability and equitable benefits. The body of research on TODs in the United States has shown that TODs are more likely to succeed when project planning takes place in conjunction with transit system expansion.
    [Show full text]
  • Tel: 905-795-0639 Friday, Octoberjune 2, 201726, 2018 Volvol 24, 23, No
    www.WeeklyVoice.com FRONT PAGE Friday, October 26, 2018 | A-1 Leader in South Asian News - Tel: 905-795-0639 Friday, OctoberJune 2, 201726, 2018 www.WeeklyVoice.com VolVol 24, 23, No. No. 43 22 PM: 40025701 A-2 | Friday, October 26, 2018 www.WeeklyVoice.com With powerful Whisper Quiet motor, TruSteam e ortlessly cleans the hood interior by spraying 130C high-temperature steam onto the fan blades and interior housing followed by a hot water rinse. It is ECO-FRESH as no chemical or degreaser is needed, brings you a deep clean solution of eliminating kitchen odor and grease, cleanliness and improved hygiene is just a touch away. ✔ A unique Whisper-Quiet motor paired with larger fan blades and high-capacity housing design o er optimal performance, high at 1000cfm ✔ Sophisticated seamless body design to upgrade your kitchen ✔ Stylish High-Tech electronic touch glass control ✔ LED light bulb of longer lifespan ✔ Cave-in bottom panel facilitates to maximize suction power NEW ~ Eklos Canopy -- Chimney Hoods -- Power Packs PACIFIC RANGE HOOD Showroom: 3419 Kennedy Road, Scarborough, ON (Kennedy & Passmore) Showroom Tel: 416-754-3474 | www.paci crangehood.com | www.ekolos.com www.WeeklyVoice.com FRONT PAGE Friday, October 26, 2018 | A-3 Leader in South Asian News - Tel: 905-795-0639 Friday, OctoberJune 2, 201726, 2018 www.WeeklyVoice.com VolVol 24, 23, No. No. 43 22 PM: 40025701 New Mural In The York-Eglinton District, page 13 When Student Debt Becomes Troublesome, page 15 Toronto Councillors Commit To Fight Povery, page 16 John Tory, Patrick Brown,
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 4, Letter from Chief Planner to President And
    Appendix 4 Letter from Chief Planner to President and CEO, Metrolinx Appendix 4: Letter from Chief Planner to President and CEO, Metrolinx Jennifer Keesmaat, MES MCIP RPP Chief Planner and Executive Director City Planning City Hall Tel: 416-392-8772 John Livey, Deputy City Manager 100 Queen Street West Fax: 416-392-8115 12th Floor, East Tower [email protected] Toronto, Ontario M5H 2N2 www.toronto.ca/planning February 12, 2016 Mr. Bruce McCuaig President and CEO Metrolinx 97 Front Street West Toronto, Ontario M5J 1E6 Dear Mr. McCuaig: Re: Metrolinx Evaluation of Potential New GO RER Station Sites within the City of Toronto I am writing to summarize key points from recent meetings between City and Metrolinx staff regarding the evaluation of potential new RER station sites identified by Metrolinx. The discussions have taken place to provide City Planning input to the Metrolinx evaluation of station site options and your intended further shortlisting of options and reporting to the Metrolinx Board. Comments from City staff on the GO RER station sites has focused on planning considerations including development/city building opportunities, accessibility, and network connectivity, reflecting some of the key elements of the City’s Feeling Congested evaluation criteria for rapid transit projects. These meetings have involved City Planning staff from each District, with the exception of the East District (Scarborough) in which all new RER station sites are associated with the SmartTrack initiative. In this case, comments on these station evaluations were previously reported to the October 20, 2015 meeting of the City’s Executive Committee: http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2015.EX9.1 City comments on the remaining GO RER new station sites are detailed in Attachment 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Mimico GO Train Station in the Vicinity of Park Lawn Road
    STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Study the Mimico GO Train Station in the Vicinity of Park Lawn Road Date: April 23, 2013 To: Planning and Growth Management Committee From: Chief Planner & Executive Director, City Planning Division Ward: Ward 6 – Etobicoke-Lakeshore Reference P:\2013\ClusterB\PLN\PGMC\PG13038 Number: SUMMARY This report responds to the Planning and Growth Management Committee's direction to review the possible relocation of the Mimico GO Station at Royal York Road and Judson Street to the area of Park Lawn Road, approximately 1.5 km further east. In November 2012 Mondelez, the owners of the Mr. Christie's Bakery site at 2150 Lake Shore Boulevard West and 23 Park Lawn Road announced the closure of the bakery by the end of 2013. This announcement prompted a number of reviews including, but not limited to: land use planning, transportation and transit service and economic development. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. The Planning and Growth Management Committee receive this report for information. Financial Impact The recommendation in this report has no financial impact. Staff report for action of the Mimico GO Train Station to Park Lawn 1 DECISION HISTORY Planning and Growth Management Committee at its meeting of April 11, 2013 adopted a motion (PG23.8) entitled, "Addressing Mobility, Aligning Growth and Transit – Study the Relocation of the Mimico GO Train Station to the Vicinity of Park Lawn Road" and directed the Chief Planner and Executive Director to report to the May 16, 2013 meeting of Planning and Growth Management Committee on the approach and timelines to conduct the review. PG23.8 http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-57515.pdf ISSUE BACKGROUND On November 1, 2012, Mondelez Canada announced plans to close the Christie's bakery plant located at 2150 Lake Shore Boulevard West and 23 Park Lawn Road by the end of 2013 (Attachment 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Public Event 1 Community Workshops Nov
    Public Event 1 Community Workshops Nov. 24 & Dec. 3, 2016 Park Lawn / Lake Shore Area TMP Welcome Workshop Purpose We’re looking to you for ideas and insights to help guide future transportation infrastructure planning in the Park Lawn Lake Shore area. The City is carrying out a Transportation Master Plan (TMP) and is seeking your feedback on how to improve area transportation conditions. Goals 1. Convene many community members and stakeholder organizations 2. Listen and receive information early in the study process 3. Generate list of issues and suggestions from firsthand experience 4. Hold an interactive meeting 5. Introduce the project and areas of focus, the Environmental Assessment (EA) and TMP process, plus related area projects and connections to the TMP, including the consultation process 2 Park Lawn / Lake Shore Area TMP Study Area Study Purpose The City’s study will identify changes needed to improve transportation options for all users. It will guide future infrastructure planning through a cohesive multi- modal transportation plan, bringing together: • previously planned and approved infrastructure projects; • approved, unbuilt Primary Study Area Limits (as shown in above map): • Park Lawn Road, The Queensway, Windermere Avenue, and Lake Ontario development; and • the needs of the people who Secondary Study Area Limits (not shown in above map): live, work, visit and pass • For the traffic modelling assessment, a broader study area is being reviewed including development areas west of Park Lawn Road through the area. 3 Park
    [Show full text]
  • Official Plan Review: Transportation Policies
    January 2020 PH13.3 Attachment 6 Five-Year Official Plan Review TRANSPORTATION POLICIES PHASE 2 -PUBLIC & STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION SUMMARY REPORT DILLON CONSULTING LIMITED i Phase 2 Executive Summary In the fall of 2018, the City of Toronto (the City) retained Dillon Consulting Limited (Dillon) to design and deliver a consultation program to garner stakeholder and public feedback on draft amendments to the Official Plan (OP) Transportation Policies. The review and revision of existing transportation policies is part of the City’s Five-Year Official Plan Review process, and as such, the consultation program was designed to solicit feedback city-wide. The Consultation program was broken into two phases and this report summarizes the engagement for Phase 2. The consultation program was focused on four transportation policy topics: Transit, Cycling, Automated Vehicles and Shared Mobility, and Street Related Map and Schedules. Phase 2 Consultation began with a stakeholder workshop in April, 2019. Four public meetings (one in each district: North York, Etobicoke, Scarborough and Downtown) occurred in May, 2019. An additional stakeholder meeting was held in May, 2019 in an effort to reach out to advocates, organizations and academic researchers promoting accessibility and safety for vulnerable road and transit users, including the elderly, women, children, and people living with disabilities. A statutory public open house was held on November 26, 2019. The stakeholder and public meetings followed the same general format: a presentation of the transportation policies under review, a summary of What We Heard from the Phase 1 consultation and proposed key policy changes. This was combined with breakout discussion tables to examine each of the four policy topics under review in more detail.
    [Show full text]
  • Humber Bay Transit Hub Proposal
    1 Humber Bay Transit Hub Proposal for Southern Etobicoke, City of Toronto February 2014 rev. “There are intelligent, practical, and cost-effective ways to integrate multiple modes of public transit for moving people efficiently in the Greater Toronto Area” “When public servants no longer effectively perform their duties to serve the public interest – the public must take action.” Paul Chomik, P.Eng. The intent of this public transportation initiative is to facilitate a rational overall level of upgrading to public transit in southern Etobicoke and Mississauga to Downtown Toronto, while providing for increased flexibility and route choices for transit riders, including a seamless integrated public transit service across municipal boundaries with reduced need for transfers along the base route. This area transit plan proposes intelligent integration and future growth potential for the public transportation network in the western Greater Toronto Area. Copyright: Paul Chomik 2008 – 2014 All rights reserved 2 Overview The major components of this new transit proposal include: 1) Retaining and enhancing the existing Humber Loop facility as an integrated multi- modal area hub for public transit. 2) Introducing a new LRT west from Humber Loop along The Queensway to Sherway Gardens - which is a major transportation corridor that has traditionally been significantly deficient in public transit. 3) Extension of the LRT west into the City of Mississauga, Peel Region, along The Queensway and the existing Hydro right-of-way to Hurontario Street, and beyond (in the future). 4) Re-introduction of streetcar service through Sunnyside to the Canadian National Exhibition grounds, which has been deficient in public transit service since the late 1950s when construction of the F.G.
    [Show full text]
  • April 5, 2017 Draft Disclaimer This Document Is a Draft and Is Provided
    April 5, 2017 Draft Disclaimer This document is a draft and is provided for information only. The information contained herein is subject to change during the Transit Project Assessment Process. The final version of this document will be available following the Notice of Completion. APPENDIX B Preliminary ESA Gap Analysis Report – Rail Corridors DRAFT GO Rail Network Electrification Transit Project Assessment Process Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment Gap Analysis Report - Rail Corridors Submitted to: Submitted by: GF Project No. 060277/060070 DRAFT GO Rail Network Electrification TPAP Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment Gap Analysis Report - Rail Corridors METROLINX GO RAIL NETWORK ELECTRIFICATION Quality Assurance Document Release Form Name of Firm: MORRISON HERSHFIELD Document Name: Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment Gap Analysis Report - Rail Corridors Revision No. 1 Submittal Date: November 24, 2016 Discipline: Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment Prepared By: Jonathan Kerr and Forest Pearson Date: July, 2016 Reviewed By: Leah Deveaux Date: October 14, 2016 Approved By : Amber Saltarelli Date: November 30, 2016 Project Manager The above electronic signatures indicate that the named document is controlled by GF Canada ULC, and has been: 1. Prepared by qualified staff in accordance with generally accepted professional practice. 2. Checked for completeness and accuracy by the appointed discipline reviewers and that the discipline reviewers did not perform the original work. 3. Reviewed and resolved compatibility interfaces and potential conflicts among the involved disciplines. 4. Updated to address previously agreed-to reviewer comments, including any remaining comments from previous internal or external reviews. 5. Reviewed for conformance to scope and other statutory and regulatory requirements. 6. Determined suitable for submittal by the Project Manager.
    [Show full text]
  • Toronto-Ontario Transit Update
    EX9.1 Part 2 Appendix A Advertising Campaign • Advertisements • Notice of Phase 1 PICs • Postcards Advertisements The future of the transit system is on a need-to-know basis. And you need to know. Have your say at Toronto.ca/TransitReview Transit expansion is exciting news. Transit maintenance? Not so much. Yet both are equally important. Learn why at Toronto.ca/TransitReview Notice of Phase 1 PICs The City of Toronto holds public consultations as one way to engage residents in the life of their city. We invite you to get involved. Transit Review - Public Information Meeting Maintaining and expanding Toronto’s transit system The City is holding public meetings where you can learn more about the review on transit responsibilities between the City and Province. Open house, followed by presentation. Thurs. June 13, 6:30 to 8:30 p.m. Father Serra Separate School, 111 Sun Row Dr., Etobicoke Thurs. June 20, 6:30 to 8:30 p.m. North York Memorial Community Hall, 5110 Yonge St., North York Sat. June 22, 10:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. Scarborough Civic Centre, 150 Borough Dr., Scarborough Thurs. June 27, 6:30 to 8:30 p.m. City Hall, Council Chamber, 100 Queen St. W., Toronto Public transit services in Toronto are integral to the city and region’s vitality. Changes are being made by the Province to the way transit is planned, designed, constructed, and funded in the city. Come learn more and have your say about the changes. If you are unable to attend in person, please note that we are live streaming the June 27 meeting at youtube.com/thecityoftoronto Tel: 416-398-5395 Email: [email protected] Visit: toronto.ca/transitreview Postcards Changes are being made to how transit is planned, designed, funded and delivered in Toronto.
    [Show full text]