DOCSLIB.ORG

Engineering of the BRICS Engagement” Is a Valuable Addition to the Growing Literature on the Various Issues Critical to the BRICS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ENGINEERING ofthe BRICS ENGAGEMENT AnMVIRDCWorldTradeCentreMumbaiResearchInitiative he concept of a World Trade Centre in Mumbai was born Tof a vision of Sir M. Visvesvaraya, on June 26, 1970, epitomizing a strong conviction that India's future prosperity lay in trade, industrial research and development. He anticipated the need for India's industrial development through research and development in the fields of education, trade, investment and the economy as a whole, with the motto clearly being, ‘Prosperity through trade’. WTC Mumbai serves as a corollary to India's challenges in the areas of economy and trade, virtually growing beyond the ambit or scope of the government and trade promotion organizations. At the time, there was felt the need of a concept of World Trade Centre at a global level which could create the necessary linkages in various sectors of the economy across countries of the world. The World Trade Centre addresses the key issues of International Development through educational programmes, research & publications, tenant facilities and an array of trade activities. The promoters of WTC Mumbai developed the idea and concept of the Centre in a unique tripartite partnership of state, government and the private sector. In due course, WTC Mumbai was registered under the Indian Companies Act, 1956 as a Section 25 not- for-profit company named M. Visvesvarya Industrial Research and Development Centre (MVIRDC). MVIRDC's prime objective is to conduct research and development and its ancillary objective is establishment of WTCs in India and abroad. From there on WTC Mumbai continues to be a living testimony with a promise to excel and go beyond in every field and to take on the challenges of the future. www.wtcmumbai.org ENGINEERINGoftheBRICS ENGAGEMENT Foreword rom the first Summit in Yekaterinburg in 2009 to the Goa Summit in 2016, BRICS has come a long way. What was conceived as a list of four (BRIC) good investment destinations has grown into a five country (BRICS) grouping whose Fagenda is continually expanding. In this short span, BRICS has brought to the table new ideas on global governance issues. The establishments of the New Development Bank (NDB) and the Contingency Reserve Arrangement (CRA) are impressive achievements. However, BRICS also faces many challenges, some of them being the slowing down of economic growth in the five countries and the worrying trend on the global scene of a move against globalization and free trade. The best way to judge BRICS would be to treat it as a work in progress and not as a finished product. This publication “Engineering of the BRICS Engagement” is a valuable addition to the growing literature on the various issues critical to the BRICS. This short research work comprehensively covers all relevant issues – current economic difficulties of BRICS, Intra BRICS cooperation in a variety of sectors, reforms of the global financial institutions and the pressing questions on global governance. A lot of research has gone into the work. Over the last few years, BRICS has been trying out-reach activities as a way of South-South cooperation. This has become an important activity of BRICS even though it was not in the original agenda. This study identifies some areas where this kind of cooperation could prove productive. Employment generation is an area of crucial importance to all the five countries. That is where the significance of MSMEs (Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises) lies. The study has addressed in detail the constraints that the five countries face in expanding MSME activities. The possibilities of cooperation in this sector for mutual benefit should be explored. The question of inclusive growth is another issue which preoccupies the five countries. In the last two decades, the gap between the rich and the poor in the five countries has widened. How can they address this issue without affecting the continued economic growth? This study has some interesting suggestions. The five pillars proposed by India at the Goa Summit have been explored in depth. India is very keen to lay stress on these pillars. The most significant parts of the study are the Conclusion and Recommendations which are practical and could yield quick results. Some recommendations like having a BRICS Secretariat may not be feasible immediately but those on BRICS Stock Exchange, Urban Development Portal and Trade Facilitation Panel have great promise. On the whole, this study will not only help scholars doing research on BRICS but also contribute to policy formulation by the five governments. I congratulate the World Trade Centre, Mumbai for their efforts in bringing out this publication. Mr. H. H. S. Viswanathan Distinguished Fellow, Observer Research Foundation, New Delhi 1 ENGINEERINGoftheBRICS ENGAGEMENT Preface n 2001, Jim O'Neill, British Economist and former chairman of Goldman Sachs Asset Management Company, coined the term BRIC to denote a bloc comprising Brazil, Russia, India and China and how they would emerge as the world’s most dominant Ieconomies by 2050. This implied a landmark shift in the global economic power balance, as no one until then could assume that established nations could lose their pre-eminent position in a not-so-distant future. However, Jim’s reasoning was strong enough to make the skeptics sit up and take a careful note of the rapidly changing dynamic of the world economy. A decade and half later in 2016, WTC Mumbai has taken up this ambitious study to gauge the importance and examine how the alignment of BRICS nations has helped them achieve economic growth and development. The comprehensive study peers into the institutional mechanism for cooperation in trade, investment and sustainable development goals among member nations. The study has collected, collated and studied views of diplomats, government functionaries, businessmen, financial institutions, trade and industry bodies, economists, academicians and other stakeholders to ascertain where the idea of BRICS stands at the beginning of 2017. Somewhat coincidentally, the world economy has been on a roller coaster ride since the first publication of O'Neill’s BRIC research note. However, the BRIC nations (with South Africa making a cut in 2010 to help expand the acronym to BRICS) have registered a fairly higher rate of growth than the average growth rate of the world economy. And in spite of some slowdown in four of the five BRICS economies in the last three years, the general sentiment is that the group’s true potential is yet to be realized and is worth all the time and effort. Some key achievements of the BRICS nations, as noted below, bear a testimony to this belief: 1) Cooperation: The grouping together of such disparate nations such as China, India, Russia, Brazil and South Africa has had enormous influence on how nations perceive themselves and how other nations have come to view the bloc. The group has conducted eight summits till 2016 to develop cooperation across a swathe of areas, ranging from economic and financial domains to anti-terrorism measures. 2) Sustainable Development: Accounting for 40% of the world's population and slightly more than a quarter of the world's land mass, the impact of climate change and global warming has had a direct bearing on BRICS nations. In the recently concluded Paris Talks on capping carbon emissions, India and China have committed huge sums to develop renewable energy. As generous tax breaks and financial assistance make possible the infrastructure for new solar parks and wind energy, these initiatives have the potential to bring cutting-edge technology to poorer nations all around the world. 3) Financial Institutions: The need for financial independence, against having to depend on restrictive, West-led financial bodies, has led to the creation of the New Development Bank (earlier termed as the BRICS Bank). With a capitalization of $100 billion, NDB supports infrastructure and sustainable development projects in member nations. NDB is also establishing a wide-ranging network of global partnerships with other financial institutions, expanding its scope of operation. 4) Arbitration: Realizing the importance of inter-state arbitration, the BRICS nations are striving to develop their own arbitration centers to mediate in cases of disputes using mutually acceptable business and commerce principles. In October 2015, the BRICS Dispute Resolution Center Shanghai was set up with the support of China Law Society and other members of BRICS legal community to accept arbitration cases from commercial parties of the member countries. 5) Visa Regulations: BRICS nations are also working on visa liberalization, to enhance exchange of students, artists, tourists, business professionals and so on. Seamless movement of people across borders would benefit skill development initiatives across nations through exchange of students / professionals. Through a meticulous analysis of the strengths, weakness, opportunity and threat of the individual economies by gathering primary and secondary data and views from experts, the study has presented how appropriate engineering of the BRICS alliance can be mutually beneficial for all the member countries. Mr. Kamal Morarka Chairman, MVIRDC WTC Mumbai 2 ENGINEERINGoftheBRICS ENGAGEMENT C O N T E N T S Pg. no. ¡ Foreword 1 ¡ Preface 2 ¡ Executive Summary 4 Section 1: Overview u Institutional Mechanisms: BRICS 6 v Financial Integration and Investments: Context to India 21 w BRICS and major country exchanges 41 x SME Scenario Inter BRICS 49 Section 2:
Recommended publications
  • Rosneft's Offshore Partnerships: the Re-Opening of the Russian

    Rosneft's Offshore Partnerships: the Re-Opening of the Russian

    140 Polar Record 49 (249): 140–153 (2013). c Cambridge University Press 2012. doi:10.1017/S0032247412000137 Rosneft’s offshore partnerships: the re-opening of the Russian petroleum frontier? Indra Overland and Jakub Godzimirski Norwegian Institute of International Affairs, PB 8159, Dept., 0033 Oslo, Norway ([email protected]) Lars Petter Lunden and Daniel Fjaertoft Sigra Group, Fagerheimgata 8, 0567 Oslo, Norway Received December 2011; first published online 2 April 2012 ABSTRACT. During an intense period of only 14 months, from June 2010 to August 2011, six major cooperation agreements between oil companies were announced in Russia. Almost all of these partnerships involved offshore projects, with an international oil company as one of the partners and Rosneft as the other. The agreements were concentrated along Russia’s Arctic petroleum frontier, and the three that survived the longest involved oil or gas extraction in the Arctic. This article analyses and compares the contents and contexts of the agreements, to ascertain what they have to tell about access for international companies to Russia’s offshore petroleum resources and the influence of competing Russian political actors over the country’s petroleum sector. The article argues that the new partnerships did represent an intention to open up the Russian continental shelf, and that the agreements were driven and shaped by a series of needs: to secure foreign capital and competence, to reduce exploration risk, to lobby for a better tax framework, to show the government that necessary action was being taken to launch exploration activities, to improve Rosneft’s image abroad, and either to avert or prepare for future privatisation of state companies such as Rosneft.
  • The Killing of William Browder

    The Killing of William Browder

    THE KILLING OF WILLIAM BROWDER THE KILLING OF WILLIAM BROWDER Bill Browder, the fa lse crusader for justice and human rights and the self - styled No. 1 enemy of Vladimir Putin has perpetrated a brazen and dangerous deception upon the Weste rn world. This book traces the anatomy of this deception, unmasking the powerful forces that are pushing the West ern world toward yet another great war with Russia. ALEX KRAINER EQUILIBRIUM MONACO First published in Monaco in 20 17 Copyright © 201 7 by Alex Krainer ISBN 978 - 2 - 9556923 - 2 - 5 Material contained in this book may be reproduced with permission from its author and/or publisher, except for attributed brief quotations Cover page design, content editing a nd copy editing by Alex Krainer. Set in Times New Roman, book title in Imprint MT shadow To the people of Russia and the United States wh o together, hold the keys to the future of humanity. Enlighten the people generally, and tyranny and oppressions of body and mind will vanish like the evil spirits at the dawn of day. Thomas Jefferson Table of Contents 1. Bill Browder and I ................................ ................................ ............... 1 Browder’s 2005 presentation in Monaco ................................ .............. 2 Harvard club presentation in 2010 ................................ ........................ 3 Ru ssophobia and Putin - bashing in the West ................................ ......... 4 Red notice ................................ ................................ ............................ 6 Reading
  • Mr. Chairman, I Welcome the Opportunity to Appear Before The

    Mr. Chairman, I Welcome the Opportunity to Appear Before The

    Mr. Chairman, I welcome the opportunity to appear before the Helsinki Commission to discuss the current situation in Russia and the concerns of all of us about the Putin government and the future of Russia. First, I wish to emphasize the value of the Commission’s mandate and stated criteria to promote compliance with the fundamental standards of civil society in Russia and the other former Soviet republics. Second, those of us who have witnessed first-hand the travesty of justice in Russia much appreciate the concerns expressed by the co-chairmen about the improper handling of the Yukos trial and the sentencing of Mikhail Khodorkovsky and his colleagues by Russian authorities. Your formal statement to the world’s press that the “case appears to the world to be justice directed by politics” and that the “selective prosecution such as appears to be the case here will wreak havoc on Russia’s legal system” reflects that the chairmen of this commission have an accurate view of the Khodorkovsky trial and the weakened state of the legal system in Russia. Third, it is vitally important that the Helsinki Commission continue monitoring the implementation of the provisions of the 1975 Helsinki Accords as they relate to Russia and report its findings to the public. While the U.S. Administration and Congressional leaders must necessarily balance many variables in the bilateral relationship, the Helsinki Commission has a clear mandate to insure that human rights and basic freedoms are maintained in the countries under its jurisdiction. Mr. Chairman, it is my opinion that the rule of law is the cornerstone of civil society because it serves to protect the rights and freedoms of all citizens.
  • An Assessment of Russian Civil Society (2005)

    An Assessment of Russian Civil Society (2005)

    An Assessment of Russian Civil Society (2005) CIVICUS CIVIL SOCIETY INDEX REPORT FOR THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION L. Proskuryakova’, Е. Vandisheva – St. Petersburg “Strategy” Center; N. Belyaeva, Е. Bychkova – State University – Higher School of Economics, 2005 St. Petersburg Center for Humanities and Political Studies “Strategy” in collaboration with the Departments of Public Policy of the Moscow State University – Higher School of Economics CIVICUS Civil Society Index Short Assessment Tool (CSI-SAT) An international action-research project coordinated by CIVICUS: World Alliance for Citizen Participation 1 FOREWORD The CSI-SAT in Russia was carried out by the National coordinating organisation in Russia - St. Petersburg “Strategy” Center in cooperation with the Moscow State University-Higher School of Economics. St. Petersburg “Strategy” Center was created in 1993 with the mission to provide “Assistance in establishment of civil society and constitutional state in Russia through implementing projects and programs aimed at development of public participation, social partnership and responsibility of the authorities”. Nowadays, “Strategy” Center is itself developed into a full- fledged resource and support center for public policy centers in Russia and abroad. St. Petersburg “Strategy” Centre is a member of CIVICUS and other international civil society networks. “Strategy” Centre is the only one in the North-West and one of few in Russia relatively steadily functioning public policy centre sustaining independence from authorities and corporate interests. “Strategy” Centre has been a politically non-partisan organisation since its date of establishment, independent of political forces, and does not engage in election campaign activities, for the same reason. Current programs of “Strategy” Center include: 1.
  • HJS 'Putin Sees and Hears It All' Report.Qxd

    HJS 'Putin Sees and Hears It All' Report.Qxd

    Putin SeeS and HearS it all: How ruSSia’S intelligence agencieS Menace tHe uK BY DR ANDREW FOXALL DEMOCRACY | FREEDOM | HUMAN RIGHTS November 2018 First published in 2018 by The Henry Jackson Society. The Henry Jackson Society Millbank Tower 21-24 Millbank London SW1P 4QP Registered charity no. 1140489 Tel: +44 (0)20 7340 4520 www.henryjacksonsociety.org © The Henry Jackson Society, 2018. All rights reserved. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author and are not necessarily indicative of those of The Henry Jackson Society or its Trustees. Title: “PuTiN SEES AND HEARS iT ALL: HOW RuSSiA’S iNTELLigENcE AgENciES MENAcE THE uK” By: Dr Andrew Foxall Putin SeeS and HearS it all: How ruSSia’S intelligence agencieS Menace tHe uK BY DR ANDREW FOXALL November 2018 PuTiN SEES AND HEARS iT ALL “Dr. Foxall’s report forcefully reminds us that Russian Intelligence activity in the West is still large scale and intrusive, and that we need to devote significant resources and expertise ourselves to monitoring and blunting this threat to our national security. As during the Cold War an effective counterintelligence capability remains an essential part of our own intelligence and security community.” Sir richard dearlove KcMg oBe chief of the Secret intelligence Service (Mi6) (1999-2004) “Anyone who is relaxed or complacent about Russian intelligence activity in the United Kingdom should read this Report. Not only have we experienced the murder of Litvinenko and the attempted murder of the Skripals on British soil, Britain and the West as a whole face an unrelenting assault from Putin’s bloated intelligence and security agencies.
  • 2013 Submarine Cable Market Industry Report

    2013 Submarine Cable Market Industry Report

    submarine telecoms INDUSTRY REPORT 2013 Authored by Submarine Cable Industry Report Issue 2 March 2013 Copyright © 2013 by Submarine Telecoms Forum, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used or reproduced by any means, graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping or by any information storage retrieval system without the written permission of the publisher except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. Submarine Telecoms Forum, Inc. 21495 Ridgetop Circle Suite 201 Sterling, Virginia 20166 USA www.subtelforum.com ISSN: pending 2 Disclaimer: While every care is taken in preparation of this publication, the publishers cannot be held responsible for the accuracy of the information herein, or any errors which may occur in advertising or editorial content, or any consequence arising from any errors or omissions, and the editor reserves the right to edit any advertising or editorial material submitted for publication. If you have a suggestion, please let us know by emailing [email protected]. 3 Table of Contents 1. Foreword 10 2. Introduction 11 3. Executive Summary 13 4. Worldwide Market Analysis and Outlook 18 4.1 Overview of Historical System Investment 20 4.2 2008 – 2012 Systems in Review 20 4.3 Systems Investment in 2013 and Beyond 21 5. Supplier Analysis 25 5.1 System Suppliers 25 5.2 Upgrade Suppliers 26 6. Ownership Analysis 28 6.1 Financing of Current Submarine Systems 28 7. Regional Market Analysis and Capacity Outlook 31 7.1 Transatlantic
  • S:\FULLCO~1\HEARIN~1\Committee Print 2018\Henry\Jan. 9 Report

    S:\FULLCO~1\HEARIN~1\Committee Print 2018\Henry\Jan. 9 Report

    Embargoed for Media Publication / Coverage until 6:00AM EST Wednesday, January 10. 1 115TH CONGRESS " ! S. PRT. 2d Session COMMITTEE PRINT 115–21 PUTIN’S ASYMMETRIC ASSAULT ON DEMOCRACY IN RUSSIA AND EUROPE: IMPLICATIONS FOR U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY A MINORITY STAFF REPORT PREPARED FOR THE USE OF THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION JANUARY 10, 2018 Printed for the use of the Committee on Foreign Relations Available via World Wide Web: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/congress/index.html U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 28–110 PDF WASHINGTON : 2018 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Mar 15 2010 04:06 Jan 09, 2018 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5012 Sfmt 5012 S:\FULL COMMITTEE\HEARING FILES\COMMITTEE PRINT 2018\HENRY\JAN. 9 REPORT FOREI-42327 with DISTILLER seneagle Embargoed for Media Publication / Coverage until 6:00AM EST Wednesday, January 10. COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS BOB CORKER, Tennessee, Chairman JAMES E. RISCH, Idaho BENJAMIN L. CARDIN, Maryland MARCO RUBIO, Florida ROBERT MENENDEZ, New Jersey RON JOHNSON, Wisconsin JEANNE SHAHEEN, New Hampshire JEFF FLAKE, Arizona CHRISTOPHER A. COONS, Delaware CORY GARDNER, Colorado TOM UDALL, New Mexico TODD YOUNG, Indiana CHRISTOPHER MURPHY, Connecticut JOHN BARRASSO, Wyoming TIM KAINE, Virginia JOHNNY ISAKSON, Georgia EDWARD J. MARKEY, Massachusetts ROB PORTMAN, Ohio JEFF MERKLEY, Oregon RAND PAUL, Kentucky CORY A. BOOKER, New Jersey TODD WOMACK, Staff Director JESSICA LEWIS, Democratic Staff Director JOHN DUTTON, Chief Clerk (II) VerDate Mar 15 2010 04:06 Jan 09, 2018 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 S:\FULL COMMITTEE\HEARING FILES\COMMITTEE PRINT 2018\HENRY\JAN.
  • Creating the New Czar

    Creating the New Czar

    International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence ISSN: 0885-0607 (Print) 1521-0561 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ujic20 Creating the New Czar Michael Rubin To cite this article: Michael Rubin (2018) Creating the New Czar, International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence, 31:2, 387-395, DOI: 10.1080/08850607.2018.1418556 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/08850607.2018.1418556 Published online: 26 Mar 2018. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ujic20 International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence, 31: 387–428, 2018 Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC ISSN: 0885-0607 print/1521-0561 online DOI: 10.1080/08850607.2018.1418556 none defined BOOK REVIEWS Creating the New Czar MICHAEL RUBIN Mikhail Zygar: All the Kremlin’s Men: Inside the Court of Vladimir Putin PublicAffairs, New York, 2016, 371 p., $27.99. During the 2012 U.S. presidential rather than adversary conformed to debates, President Barack Obama the majority view among the foreign mocked the Republican contender, policy elite. Consider the recent former Massachusetts governor Mitt bipartisan record of outreach to Romney, for identifying Russia as Moscow: On 16 June 2001, President the greatest geopolitical threat facing George W. Bush met Russian the United States. “The 1980s are President Vladimir Putin for the first now calling to ask for their foreign time at a summit in Slovenia. While, policy back, because, the Cold War’s in hindsight, U.S.–Russia relations been over for 20 years,” quipped reached their peak in the 1990s Obama.1 during Bill Clinton’s administration, While history shows Obama wrong, Bush wanted more.
  • KENNAN INSTITUTE Annual Report 2005–2006

    KENNAN INSTITUTE Annual Report 2005–2006

    2005 2006 KENNAN INSTITUTE KENNAN INST I TUTE Annual Report KENN A N I N S T I TUTE KENNAN INSTITUTE Annual Report 2005–2006 Kennan Institute Annual Report 2005–2006 KENNAN INSTITUTE KENNAN INSTITUTE KENNAN INSTITUTE Also employed at the Kennan RESEARCH ASSISTANTS Woodrow Wilson International Center Institute during the 2005-06 2005–2006 for Scholars program year: Leeza Arkhangelskaya, Justin Caton, One Woodrow Wilson Plaza Erin Trouth Hofmann, Program Assistant Ariana Curtis, Sheila Dawes, Andrei 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Doohovskoy, Emily Gee, Marina Isupov, Washington, DC 20004-3027 KENNAN MOSCOW PROJECT Jeffrey Jackson, Munir Elahi Jawed, Galina Levina, Program Manager Kristin Kadar, Stergos Kaloudis, Anna Tel (202) 691-4100 Ekaterina Alekseeva, Program Manager Kolev, Alexander Kontor, Maxim Fax (202) 691-4247 and Editor Leyzerovich, Amy Liedy, Christina Ling, www.wilsoncenter.org/kennan Irina Petrova, Office Manager Timothy McDonnell, Vlada Musayelova, Pavel Korolev, Program Officer Kimberly Painter, Rickita Perry, Katherine KENNAN INSTITUTE STAFF Anna Toker, Accountant Pruess, Talya Vatman, Alexei Voronin, Blair A. Ruble, Director Murad Pateev, Technical Support Kristina Wyatt, Oliya Zamaray Margaret Paxson, Senior Associate Summer Brown, Program Specialist KENNAN KYIV PROJECT F. Joseph Dresen, Program Associate Yaroslav Pylynskyi, Project Manager Jennifer Giglio, Program Associate Nataliya Samozvanova, Office Manager Renata Kosc-Harmatiy, Program Associate Markian Dobczansky, Editorial Assistant Edita Krunkaityte, Program Assistant Megan Yasenchak, Program Assistant 2 Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars CONTENTS OVERVIEW 3 DIRECTOR’S REVIEW 5 ADVISORY COUNCILS 0 KENNAN COUNCIL 11 SCHOLARS 3 CASE PROGRAM 2 MEETINGS 26 PUBLICATIONS 58 FUNDING 66 Unless otherwise noted, photographs for this report were provided by William Craft Brumfield, photographer and Professor of Slavic Languages at Tulane University.
  • The EU and Russia Locked Into Confrontation

    The EU and Russia Locked Into Confrontation

    BRIEFING The EU and Russia Locked into confrontation SUMMARY Following the post-Cold War reset of the 1990s, EU-Russia relations have become increasingly tense. Although initially seen as a pro-Western reformer, since the start of his first presidency in 2000 Vladimir Putin has shown increasingly authoritarian tendencies, and his efforts to assert Russian influence over post-Soviet neighbours threaten the sovereignty of those states. Russia's 2008 war against Georgia led to no more than a temporary cooling of relations with the European Union (EU). However, its 2014 annexation of Crimea caused a more permanent rupture. Responding to Russian aggression in Ukraine, the EU adopted hard-hitting sanctions. In 2016, the EU decided to base its Russia policy on five principles, which remain as valid as ever in 2020. They are: insistence on full implementation of the Minsk Agreements on eastern Ukraine as a condition for lifting sanctions against Russia; efforts to strengthen relations with Russia's former Soviet neighbours; greater EU resilience to Russian threats; selective engagement with Russia on certain issues such as counter-terrorism; and support for EU-Russia people-to-people contacts. After six years of deadlock, French president Emmanuel Macron is among those calling for renewed EU-Russia dialogue. Improved relations between Ukraine and Russia following the election of President Volodymyr Zelenskiy in spring 2019 raised hopes of a solution to the Donbass conflict, which is still the main obstacle to better relations between the two sides. However, there is still no sign of a breakthrough. In this Briefing • How did we get here? • The five guiding principles of the EU's Russia policy • What next for EU-Russia relations? Queen Louise Bridge, on the Russian-Lithuanian border.
  • Towards an Adaptive Socio-Technical Broadband Growth and Penetration (BGP) Framework: a Case of SADC

    Towards an Adaptive Socio-Technical Broadband Growth and Penetration (BGP) Framework: a Case of SADC

    ------ M06007065iEl 7 Towards an adaptive socio-technical Broadband Growth and Penetration (BGP) framework: A case of SADC. KARIKOGA GOREJENA 24878553 Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Information Systems) at the Mafikeng Campus of the North-West University 2018 -11 - 1 4 p.ee ~•o.: \ NOkTH-WEST U1JtvE.R5iTY Supervisor: Prof Nehemiah Mavetera Co-supervisor: Dr Mthulisi Velempini • OORTI< -WEST UHWERSITT ® YUNIBESITI YA BOKONE-BOPHIRIMA NOORDWES-UNIVERSITEIT COPYRIGHT: All rights are reserved by Karikoga Gorejena and the North West University, South Africa. DECLARATION I do here by declare that Towards An Adaptive Socio-Technical Broadband Growth and Penetration (BGP) Framework: A case of SADC is my work and hereby present it for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Information Systems at the North West University, South Africa. This work has not been submitted to any university or educational institution before for examination. All materials consulted have been duly acknowledged through referencing . .......~~~ .... ...... ......................... .................... ... .. .. .. ... Karikoga Gorejena ii DEDICATION I dedicate this work to all the 3rd World people of all ethnic backgrounds whose potential has not been maximised and whose dreams became a nightmare due to the unforgiving circumstances around their birthplaces. l also dedicate this work to my late parents Mr 0 . and Mrs K. Gorejena. To Clara Mauwa, Ruth, Prince and Daniel Gorejena. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to acknowledge God Almighty for enabling me to live beyond human ability and for insightful nuggets captured in this work. Thanks Dad. My graceful gratitude goes to my promoters, Prof N. Mavetera and Dr M.
  • The Yukos Money Laundering Case: a Never-Ending Story

    The Yukos Money Laundering Case: a Never-Ending Story

    Michigan Journal of International Law Volume 28 Issue 4 2007 The Yukos Money Laundering Case: A Never-Ending Story Dmitry Gololobov Gololobov and Co. Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjil Part of the Business Organizations Law Commons, Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, and the Criminal Law Commons Recommended Citation Dmitry Gololobov, The Yukos Money Laundering Case: A Never-Ending Story, 28 MICH. J. INT'L L. 711 (2007). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjil/vol28/iss4/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Michigan Journal of International Law at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Journal of International Law by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE YUKOS MONEY LAUNDERING CASE: A NEVER-ENDING STORY Dmitry Gololobov* I. A BRIEF STORY OF THE YUKos GROUP ................................... 711 II. THE YUKOS CASE: THE TIMELINE AND THE C ON SEQUEN CES ........................................................................ 7 16 III. THE MONEY LAUNDERING LEGISLATION OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION .............................................................. 720 IV. PRINCIPLES OF THE KHODORKOVSKYIYUKOS MONEY LAUNDERING C ASE .................................................................. 724 V. GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE CASE .............................. 726 A . Tim ing ...............................................................................