KENNAN INSTITUTE Annual Report 2005–2006
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
2005 2006 KENNAN INSTITUTE KENNAN INST I TUTE Annual Report KENN A N I N S T I TUTE KENNAN INSTITUTE Annual Report 2005–2006 Kennan Institute Annual Report 2005–2006 KENNAN INSTITUTE KENNAN INSTITUTE KENNAN INSTITUTE Also employed at the Kennan RESEARCH ASSISTANTS Woodrow Wilson International Center Institute during the 2005-06 2005–2006 for Scholars program year: Leeza Arkhangelskaya, Justin Caton, One Woodrow Wilson Plaza Erin Trouth Hofmann, Program Assistant Ariana Curtis, Sheila Dawes, Andrei 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Doohovskoy, Emily Gee, Marina Isupov, Washington, DC 20004-3027 KENNAN MOSCOW PROJECT Jeffrey Jackson, Munir Elahi Jawed, Galina Levina, Program Manager Kristin Kadar, Stergos Kaloudis, Anna Tel (202) 691-4100 Ekaterina Alekseeva, Program Manager Kolev, Alexander Kontor, Maxim Fax (202) 691-4247 and Editor Leyzerovich, Amy Liedy, Christina Ling, www.wilsoncenter.org/kennan Irina Petrova, Office Manager Timothy McDonnell, Vlada Musayelova, Pavel Korolev, Program Officer Kimberly Painter, Rickita Perry, Katherine KENNAN INSTITUTE STAFF Anna Toker, Accountant Pruess, Talya Vatman, Alexei Voronin, Blair A. Ruble, Director Murad Pateev, Technical Support Kristina Wyatt, Oliya Zamaray Margaret Paxson, Senior Associate Summer Brown, Program Specialist KENNAN KYIV PROJECT F. Joseph Dresen, Program Associate Yaroslav Pylynskyi, Project Manager Jennifer Giglio, Program Associate Nataliya Samozvanova, Office Manager Renata Kosc-Harmatiy, Program Associate Markian Dobczansky, Editorial Assistant Edita Krunkaityte, Program Assistant Megan Yasenchak, Program Assistant 2 Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars CONTENTS OVERVIEW 3 DIRECTOR’S REVIEW 5 ADVISORY COUNCILS 0 KENNAN COUNCIL 11 SCHOLARS 3 CASE PROGRAM 2 MEETINGS 26 PUBLICATIONS 58 FUNDING 66 Unless otherwise noted, photographs for this report were provided by William Craft Brumfield, photographer and Professor of Slavic Languages at Tulane University. The originals of these photographs are in the permanent collection of the Photographic Archives of the National Gallery of Art in Washington, D.C. Kennan Institute Annual Report 2005–2006 OVERVIEW he Kennan Institute was founded as a division of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars in December 974 through the joint initiative of Ambassador TGeorge F. Kennan, then Wilson Center Director James Billington, and historian S. Frederick Starr. Named in honor of Ambassador Kennan’s relative, George Kennan “the Elder” (845–924), a nineteenth-century explorer of Russia and Siberia, the Kennan Institute is committed to improving American expertise and knowledge about Russia, Ukraine, and other states in the region. It is one of several area studies programs of the Wilson Center. The Center is an international, interdisciplinary scholarly institution that fosters scholarship in the humanities and social sciences and encourages dialogue between the disciplines and the professions. The director of the Kennan Institute reports to the director of the Woodrow Wilson Center and receives guidance from the Kennan Institute Advisory Council and the Kennan Council. The Kennan Institute offers residential research scholarships in the humanities and social sciences to academic scholars and specialists from government, the media, and the private sector. Thanks to its location in Washington, D.C., the Kennan Institute is able to provide its scholars with access to libraries, archives, research facilities, and human resources that are among the finest in the United States. Following in the tradition of the Wilson Center, the Institute also provides decision makers in the private and public sectors with access to the expertise of its scholars in residence through such activities as Policy Forums at the Department of State, its public lecture program, and interviews with the media. In addition to its residential scholar program, the Institute administers an active program of public lectures featuring scholars and public figures from the United States, Russia, and other successor states to the Soviet Union. The Institute makes the results of its activities known in a variety of publications including Meeting Reports, Occasional Papers, Special Reports, and commercially published books. The majority of Kennan Institute publications are available free of charge and are regularly distributed to individuals, university libraries, and companies throughout the world, and are available through the Internet. OVER: LOG CHURCH OF THE Through its innovative workshop series, the Kennan Institute serves as a forum where ASCENSION, NORTHWEST VIEW, TORZHOK, TVER OBLAST. (WILLIAM C. scholars can develop and discuss their research pertaining to a variety of topics concerning the BRUMFIELD) region. The workshops bring together scholars with recent field experience from a variety of disciplines, with the goal of producing an original edited volume. The Kennan Institute and the ISE Center (Information. Scholarship. Education.), Moscow, administer the Centers for Advanced Study and Education (CASE) program. The CASE program has established nine thematic research centers at regional Russian universities. The CASEs support advanced research in the social sciences and humanities in Russia’s regions, build networks of scholars within Russia, and provide opportunities for the integration of Russian scholars into the international academic community. The CASE program is currently Kennan Institute Annual Report 2005–2006 3 DORMITION MONASTERY, CATHEDRAL funded by Carnegie Corporation of New York, the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur OF DORMITION & BELL TOWER, SOUTH Foundation, and the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation. VIEW, STARITSA, TVER OBLAST. (WILLIAM C. BRUMFIELD) In addition to its office in Washington, the Kennan Institute operates centers in Moscow and Kyiv. The Kennan Moscow Project and Kennan Kyiv Project provide on-the-ground assis- tance to the Washington staff and maintain contacts with various Russian and Ukrainian orga- nizations. The offices organize publications, seminars, and conferences on important current themes featuring Kennan Institute alumni. They serve as the core for Kennan’s Russian and Ukrainian alumni networks. The Kennan Institute, as part of the Woodrow Wilson Center, is a nonpartisan institution that values its independence from the world of politics. Unlike many academic research cen- ters, however, it seeks to promote dialogue between academic specialists and policymakers. To this end, the Institute convenes scholars, governmental specialists, and other experts to discuss political, social, and economic issues affecting Russia and the other successor states to the Soviet Union, seeking always to place these issues within their historical context. 4 Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars DIRECTOR’S REVIEW KENNAN INSTITUTE Reclaiming the Sacred ust a few months after the Soviet Union collapsed, a leading “Sovietologist” was invited by a group of even more distinguished Soviet-hands to imagine the “table of power” in the JKremlin a decade-and-a-half hence. Who would be at that table? The leaders of various democratic political parties? Women? Business leaders who competed with equal deftness with their western counterparts on the great global markets that would surely rule the world? The speaker began by observing that how people gathered around the table would be as important as who they were. Would members of this elite be elected? Alternatively, would they find their way to power via personal networks? Would they all be ethnic Russians or would there be a place at the table for representatives of other nationalities? Would women be in the room? Continuing on, he suggested that while the process was unclear, undoubtedly some of those present would be wearing expensive business suits, others would be wearing the uni- forms of various security and military forces, and others still would don clerical garb. The audience audibly gasped, and spent the evening trying to explain to the discussion leader that there would be no clerical garb at the Russian table of power. The Soviet Union had been an atheistic society and state, one that had been thoroughly secularized. In addition, the forces of a burgeoning global economy would propel others to the fore. Despite the role that religion might come to play in the private lives of individual Russian citizens, several in the room argued, there would be no public institutionalized religiosity in the former Soviet Union. Whatever aspects of Russian reality were illuminated that evening nearly fifteen years ago, even more light was shed on mainstream Washington, D.C. think-tanks. One simply did not speak of religion in polite company, especially when engaging in political analysis. How different the world—and Washington—seems today. Since the fall of communism in Russia, Ukraine, and other countries once part of the Soviet Union, religious affiliations and identities have experienced a rapid resurgence. Religion emerged as an affiliation of growing prominence against the post-99 background of new state formation, local authoritarianism, concerns over the meanings of democracy as well as the ethics of the new economy, and—in far too many instances—of poverty and war. An increasing number of people today look through the framework of religion in order to under- stand the world around them. In a region in flux, questions of religion are related to—though are by no means limited by—issues of national and international security. In fact,