DOCSLIB.ORG

Back Matter (PDF)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Index Page numbers in italic denote figures. Page numbers in bold denote tables. 64 Degree West Fracture Zone 67 see also Central Atlantic Rift System; Equatorial Atlantic; NE Atlantic-Eurasia Basin; South Acarau sub-basin, half-graben 241 Atlantic Rift System Accommodation Block Ayerwaddy River delta deposits 43, 48, 58 Guyana-Suriname continental margin 147–148, Azores-Gibraltar Fracture Zone 82 149, 153 Azores-Gibraltar Transform 5 spreading 153–154, 165, 166, 168–169, 173 accretionary prism, Andaman Sea 41 Baffin Bay 65, 85, 86, 87, 348 Acoupa depression field 188, 189, 190, 192 Barents Sea 64, 66, 70, 74, 76 Aegir Ridge 72, 339, 340, 346–347, 352 Barents Shelf-NE Greenland separation 71, 72, Africa-Antarctica ocean 300, 306–308, 309–310 344–349 see also East African margin Barents-Kara Sea margin 68, 87 Aghulas Fault Zone 316, 317, 319, 320 Barreirinhas Basin Aghulas Fracture Zone 301, 317 anhydrite 237 Aghulas transform 5 flower structure 239, 243, 244 Alaska-Chukotka rotation 81 transpressional structures 237, 239–240, 241 Alcock Rise 39, 40, 41, 52, 55, 56 Barreirinhas Shelf 223, 225 Alpha Ridge 69, 75, 76, 78, 83, 348 Beattie magnetic anomaly 314, 317 Alpha-Mendeleev Ridge system 64, 65, 68, 69, Beira High 310 85, 86, 348, 352 Benue Fracture Zone 223 Amerasian Basin shear 75, 76, 89, 349 Bering Strait 64, 87 Amapa Platform 223 Big Lyakhovsky Island 75, 76 Amazon Fan 137, 141, 142, 181, 184, 214 Billefjorden Fault Zone 70, 71, 74, 345 Amerasia Basin 66, 68, 344, 345, 349 Bjørnøya Basin 65, 72, 74, 340, 346–347 transform 67, 69, 73, 75–77, 78 Boa Vista Graben 223, 224 Andaman Basin, spreading centre 40, 41, Bonacca Basin 282, 285 56–58 Boreas Basin 344 Andaman Islands, volcanic arc 53 Bouvet triple junction 308 Andaman ophiolites 53 Bragman’s Bluff Formation 277, 278 Andaman Sea Brazil Central Region 40,41 geophysical data 220, 223 crustal thickness 53–55 oils 226, 228, 230 deformation migration 56 Brazil-Guyana continent-ocean boundary, oils Eastern Region 40,43–52 223–224, 225, 229, 230 geological setting 40,41–43 Broken Ridge 96 Northern Region 40, 41, 43 Brookian Orogeny 81–82, 86 Palaeogene tectonics 52–53, 56, 57,58–59 Brooks Range 65, 79–80, 81, 83, 84, 86, 348 structural evolution 39–59 Western Region 40,41 Cacipore Graben 223 Andrew Bain Fracture Zone 306, 307, 315, 317 Caledonian Orogeny 65, 68, 70–71, 344 Angoche dykes 309–310 Cambay rifting 349 Anisin Basin 78 Canada Basin 64, 65, 66, 68–69, 76, 345, 348 Antarctica shear 73 Elan Bank microcontinent 113–116, 342–343 widening 81–82, 84, 349 India-Antarctica plate reconstruction models 113, windshield wiper model 69, 73, 345 116–117, 342–343 Cape Range Transform 5, 362 Antarctica-Africa ocean 300, 306–308, Cape Three Points Basin 230, 237, 239 309–310 carbonate platforms 6, 128, 131, 134, 136, 137, 285, 292 Apodi Graben 223, 224 Caribbean, geological setting 274–278 Arctic Large Igneous Province 69 Caribbean Arc see Great Arc of the Caribbean Arctic Ocean 63–90, 64 Caribbean Plate 273, 274 continent-ocean boundary 68, 78,81 motion 275–276 crustal types 64 tectonic evolution 280–293, 290, 291–292 opening, kinematic history 81–87, 89 Caribe Formation 276, 277 petroleum systems 63, 88–89, 90 Carlsberg Ridge 96, 351 shear margins 67–68, 70–81 Carnaubais Trend 223, 224 transform margins 66–90 Cassipore Basin 127, 131 Atlantic Ocean, spreading 81, 82,86 Castilla Formation 277, 278 378 INDEX Cauvery Rift Zone 11, 12, 15, 18, 19, 119 crustal thickness 361–362, 364 Elan Bank release 101–102, 103, 107, 111, 112–113, crustal wounds, Elan Bank release mechanism 97–98 334, 337–338, 339–341 Cayman Trough 273, 274 Danakil Block 324, 341, 344 crust 281, 282, 283 Davie Fracture Zone 301, 308, 310, 312, 314, 316–317 geological setting 276 see also Original Davie Fracture Zone plate kinematics 290, 291–292 De Geer Line 67, 68, 89, 344 spreading 276, 280, 293 evolution 70–73, 74,88 Ceara´ Basin 223, 225 De Long Islands 75, 76 oils 226–227, 228, 230 Dead Sea Transform 77, 80 Ceara´-Potiguar/Ghana-Dahomey margin Deccan Trap basalts 306, 319, 330, 332, 333–334, segment 221, 222 351–352 Central Atlantic Magmatic Province 146 deformation Central Atlantic Rift System 1, 3 Andaman Sea 56 Guyana-Suriname case study 146–173 Honduran Borderlands/Nicaraguan Rise 282, Jurassic-Present 3 283–284, 285, 287, 292–293 linkage with South Atlantic Rift System 170–172 strike-slip, Ghana Ridge 251 rifting 4, 146, 169, 202 see also transpression; transtension southern terminus 145–146, 169, 171–173 Demerara Plateau 127, 128–129, 131, 147, 180, 181 strike-slip faults 164–165 basement ridges 187, 188, 194 Tithonian 4 bathymetry 183, 184, 189 Triassic-Jurassic boundary 2 continent-ocean boundary 184–185, 186–187, 192, triple junction 146 194, 195 Central Chortis Terrane 275, 276 continental slopes 183–185 Chagos-Laccadive Ridge 330 contourites 190–191, 193, 194 channel-levee complexes 28 eastern segment interpretation 165–166 Charlie Gibbs Fracture Zone 5, 340 faults 187, 189 Chortis Block 273, 274 formation 180 crust 281, 292, 293 geological setting 148, 180–181 geological setting 274–275 gravimetric anomalies 149, 153, 183, 184, 186, 187 plate kinematics 290, 291–292 gravity slides 181, 184, 187–188, 191, 194, 195 transport 282 IGUANES data 181–183, 184 Chukchi Borderlands Transform 64, 66, 67, 69, 76, interpretation 183–195 78, 82, 84, 90, 348 late Albian unconformity 181, 183, 185, 186–187 Chukchi Plateau 78 mounds 189–190, 191 Chukchi Sea 64, 79, 81 NE segment interpretation 165 Chukotka block 71, 73, 75, 81, 83 passive-transform margin 180 Coco Marina Formation 276, 277 porewater geochemistry 192 Codo´ Formation 245, 246 post-Albian sedimentary basin 181, 182 Colon Mountains fold and thrust belt 275, 283 seafloor depressions 188–190, 194–195 Colville Trough 86 seismic data 154–155, 156–157, 158, 159, 182–184, Comorin Ridge 304, 306 185, 187 competing rift-zone model, Elan Bank release structure 180, 183–187 mechanism 97–98 western extensional margin 159 continent-ocean boundary break-up timing 160–161 Arctic Ocean 68, 78,81 seawards-dipping reflectors 154–155, 159 Brazil-Guyana 223 Demerara/Guinea margin segment 221, 222 French Guiana margin 139, 140 Denali Fault 78 Demerara Plateau 184–185, 186–187, 192, diamondoids 223, 227 194, 195 Diligent Fault 41 contourites, Demerara Plateau 190–191, 193, 194 Dirck Hartog Ridge 304, 306 convection, secondary 5 Dix Cove Ridge 222, 223, 230 Coromandal strike-slip fault zone 102, 105, 119, 338 Dronning Maud Land 307, 308 Coromandal Transform 5, 11–12, 20–23, 110, duplexes 12, 13 112, 341 strike-slip 327 crustal thickness variation 362 dykes Elan Bank fit 107, 108, 109, 111, 334 Central Atlantic triple junction 146 horse-tail structure 15, 18–19, 21–23, 341 Mwenzi triple junction 309 Coˆte d’Ivoire see Ivory Coast creep, lower crust 366, 367, 368 East African margin 300, 301, 317 Cretaceous ‘Quiet Zone’ 73, 300, 306, 314 seismic data 316–317 Crocker Land 71 East Andaman Basin 40, 42, 43, 46, 48–52, 58 crustal flow 8, 361–362 crustal types 50–52, 53, 54 see also lower crust, ductility depocentre 48, 49, 58 INDEX 379 faulting 48–50, 54–56, 57 evaporites seismic data 39, 46, 48, 49, 50–52, 55 Demerara Plateau 161 syn-rift history 48 Honduran continental margin 276 East Coast magnetic anomaly 2 Romanche Fracture Zone 237, 245 East Gondwana 311, 312, 313, 314, 315, 316, 317 exhumation, mantle East Greenland Ridge 71, 72, 324, 340, 346–347, 348 Elan Bank 105, 109–110, 112, 115–116 release, multiple tectonic events 344–349, 352 French Guiana margin 136, 139–141 East Indian continental margin 11–12, 101, 102 extension release of Elan Bank 95–119, 334, 337–338, Andaman Sea 56 339–341 depth-dependent 5 reconstruction 107–117, 111, 334, 342–343 eastern Demerara margin 165 East Jan Mayen Fracture Zone 67, 340 Elan Bank 112–116, 337, 339–341 East Siberian Basin 78 Laptev Rift 77 East Siberian Sea 64,75 NE Atlantic 345, 346–347 East Tasman Plateau 323 extensional bridges 12, 13 Eastern Chortis Terrane 275, 276 extensional margins 1, 5, 165 Eastern Ghat Mobile Belt 95 see also Krishna-Godavari Rift Zone Eastern Margin, Andaman Sea 41 extensional oversteps 12 Eastern pull-apart terrain, Romanche Transform 250, 263, 266 Falkland Islands 314, 315, 316 Elan Bank microcontinent 95–119, 96–97, 300 Falklands Transform 5,8 boreholes 98 fault zones, influence on transforms 8 continental origin 95 faults crustal architecture 100–102, 105, 109–110 Andaman Sea 41, 42,43 model 98 Demerara Plateau 187, 189 gravity anomalies 95, 97, 98, 99–100, 104, 107 East Andaman Basin 43, 48–50 India-Antarctica plate reconstruction models Elan Bank 102–105, 118–119, 337, 338 116–117, 342–343 Guyana transform margin 162, 163–165, 167–168 mantle exhumation 105 Honduran Borderlands 282, 283–285 reconstruction 99, 107–117, 111, 334, 342–343 Mergui Basin 44–46 release from East India 95–97, 323, 334, 337–338, Nicaraguan Rise 285–286 339–341 Romanche Fracture Zone 241–243 competing rift-zone model 97–98, 118, 350, 352 in transform margins 19, 24–25, 25, 26, distal margin 103–105 29–30 oceanic domain 105–107 Fernando do Noronha Fracture Zone 223 plume-refocusing model 97, 117–118, 352 Fifa Well 243, 246 proto-oceanic domain 105 flower structures proximal margin deformation 102–103, Arctic Ocean 81, 88 104, 108 Elan Bank 99, 102 rifting 100–102 Romanche Fracture Zone 237, 239, 242, seismic profiles 98, 99, 100, 103, 104, 106 243, 244 marriage technique 98–99, 110, 112 South Sagaing Fault 49, 51 structural architecture of margins 108–109 folding, Romanche Fracture Zone 237–239, 242, tectonic timing 99, 105, 112–113
Recommended publications
  • The Worlds of the Seventeenth-Century Hudson Valley

    The Worlds of the Seventeenth-Century Hudson Valley

    1 The Seventeenth-Century Empire of the Dutch Republic, c. 1590–1672 Jaap Jacobs he overseas expansion of the Dutch Republic, culminating in the “First Dutch Empire,” is a remarkable story of the quick rise to prominence of a small country in northwestern Europe. Much smaller Tin population than European rivals like Spain, England, and France, and without considerable natural resources, the Republic was able within a few decades to lay the foundation for a colonial empire of which remnants are still part of the Kingdom of the Netherlands nowadays. This First Dutch Empire, running roughly from the beginning of the seventeenth century until the early 1670s, was characterized by rapid expansion, both in the Atlantic area and in Asia. The phase that followed, the Second Dutch Empire, shows a divergence in development between the East and West. In the East, ter- ritorial expansion—often limited to trading posts, not settlement colonies— continued and trade volume increased, but in the Western theater the Dutch witnessed a contraction of territorial possessions, especially with the loss of New Netherland and Dutch Brazil. Even so, Dutch trade and shipping in the Atlantic was not solely dependent upon colonial footholds, not in the least because the Dutch began to participate in the Atlantic slave trade. This Second Dutch Empire ended in the Age of Democratic Revolutions, when upheavals in Europe and America brought an end to both the Dutch East and West India Companies and led to the loss of a number of colonies, such as South Africa, Sri Lanka, and Essequibo and Demerara on the Guyana coast.
  • Quaternary Stratigraphy of Suriname 561

    Quaternary Stratigraphy of Suriname 561

    559 QUATERNARYSTRATIGRAPHY OF SURINAME The0 E. WONGl Abstract In this paper the Quatemary sediments of the Coastal Plain of Suriname are highlighted since they were recently subjected to a stratigraphical revision. The Pleistocene Coropina Formation, constituting the Old Coastal Plain, has now formally been subdivided into the Para and Lelydorp Members. The sedimentary history of these units has been well-documented in the past, relating high sea levels to inter-glacials and regressions to glacials. In the light of modem Quaternary stratigraphical considerations and the results of recent Brazilian investigations, the hitherto assumed Late Pleistocene age for the entire Coropina Formation has become questionable. Traditionally, all Holocene sediments in the Young Coastal Plain were grouped into the Demerara Formation. It is now realized that the Demerara Formation comprises widely differing lithologies which should not be grouped in one formation. Moreover, the name Demerara Formation has been associated too closely with the geomorphological unit Young Coastal Plain and with its Holocene age. Therefore it has been proposed to abandon the name Demerara and to attribute the status of formation to two of its most distinct lithologies (Mara and Coronie). Within the Coronie Formation three morphostratigraphic units (Wanica, Moleson and Comowine) represent oscillations of the sea. Part of these oscillations seems to correlate with Brazilian events but additional researchis needed. Résumé Le Quaternaire du Surinam a fait récemment l’objet d’une révision stratigraphique.La Formation COROPINA (Pléistocène) - qui constitue le soubassement de la plaine côtière “ancienne”- est subdivisée en deux membres: PARA (faciès argileux,à la base) et LELYDORP (faciès sableux, au sommet), dont évolution a été interprétée comme liée à des oscillations du niveau marin.
  • Testing the Atlantic Mirror Theory Justin T

    Testing the Atlantic Mirror Theory Justin T

    April 2013 ® Testing the Atlantic Mirror theory Justin T. Stolte, Latham & Watkins LLP, Houston With editorial contributions by Michael P. Darden, Latham & Watkins LLP he task of an explorer is difficult and demanding. Shareholders and Given the current state of management, along with the broader market, expect—and, in some depressed natural gas—and, recently, Tcases, mandate—the relentless generation of prospects located in natural gas liquids—prices and the regions of the world that are stable, both politically and fiscally, at entry costs significant cost and time requirements that are relatively insignificant (i.e., limited signature bonuses, limited work associated with LNG projects, the commitments, and/or limited promotes). task is further burdened with the expectation that such prospects will be oil-bearing. This task has proved Fig. 1: Suriname – Guyana Basin somewhat daunting to explorers 60˚ W 55˚ W in recent years, given the lack of Atlantic Ocean “white-space” currently available to international oil and gas companies that satisfy such expectations. Nonetheless, as the US Suriname – Guyana Basin unconventional land-rush shifts to a development stage, explorers have refocused, or, for some companies, enhanced, their efforts towards identifying prospects in parts of the Onshore world that, for a host of reasons, GUYANA Suriname Guyana borderproducing elds Suriname French Guiana border have been under-explored by the industry. Frontier basins in isolated portions of the world have been 5˚ N the recipients—and, in most cases, beneficiaries—of such efforts. One Area SURINAME FRENCH such area, the Equatorial Margin shown GUIANA of offshore Guyana, Suriname, and French Guiana in South America (the “Guianas Equatorial Margin”), has seen a great deal of attention, as several companies have recently SOUTH 0 Miles 124 become very active in the area.
  • Magna Nov 44 Nov 15

    Magna Nov 44 Nov 15

    November 2017, Vol. 28, No. 2 Magazine of the Friends of The National Archives Elmina Castle (detail). Gerard van Keulen after Johannes Vingboons (c.1640), watercolour, 1706 (Nationaal Archief, The Hague, collection maps). ‘By the ship Diamond, via the West Indies’: The captured archive of the Dutch slave forts rediscovered in The National Archives Erik van der Doe, archivist at the Dutch preservation programme Metamorfoze, unravels how the long-lost records from West Africa ended up in the Prize Papers and highlights their importance. In 1803 ten years of records of the Dutch slave forts in West Africa were put aboard ship for the Netherlands. The archive never arrived at its destination, the Council of the American Colonies and Territories – a successor of the Dutch West India Company1 – in The Hague. It turns out that the archive was captured by the British and finally ended up at The National Archives (TNA) in London. Recently it was rediscovered and its conservation and digitisation funded by Metamorfoze. In the Netherlands the news of this rediscovery was covered by the Dutch National Geographic.2 Metamorfoze is the national programme for the Britain/England (before 1707), Spain and France. In preservation of the paper heritage of the Netherlands. It fifth place were the Dutch, with around 600,000 slaves. is part of the Ministry of Education, Culture and Science In 2013, it was 150 years since the Netherlands and is located at the Royal Library/National Library of abolished slavery in Surinam and the Dutch Antilles, the Netherlands3 in The Hague. Metamorfoze issues and in 2014 it was 200 years since the trans-Atlantic subsidies to heritage institutions to carry out projects.
  • Lisa Booth and Guyana/BG Genealogical Society Pg 1 EMMIGRANTS from GUYANA to US - Surnames N to Z (Partial Listing, Various Years)

    Lisa Booth and Guyana/BG Genealogical Society Pg 1 EMMIGRANTS from GUYANA to US - Surnames N to Z (Partial Listing, Various Years)

    EMMIGRANTS FROM GUYANA TO US - Surnames N to Z (partial listing, various years) LAST FIRST SHIP YR MO DY Final YR Mo SEX Status ETHNICITY OCC Town Country BG RELATIVES left/ relatives joining in US Arrival Date DEST AGE Marital WHERE BORN NABBUBASK Marie Parima 1910 May 20 NY 29 F M Portug. Housewife - Demerara Mother Louisa DE FREITAS, Demerara, to husb. NY NABBUBASK Sarah Parima 1910 May 20 NY 2 F S US Citizen None New York USA Travelling with mother NARAIN John R. Korona 1907 Jun 2 NY 29 2 M M W.Indian Bailiff Georgetown Demerara NASCIMENTO Antonio F. Korona 1908 May 24 NY 30 M S W.Indian Merchant Georgetown Demerara Frank GOUVIES, GT NASCIMENTO Maria G. Korona 1908 Jun 28 NY 24 4 F S Portug. Saleswoman Madeira Jose A. GOUVEIA, Plaisance, EC NASSEY Adolf Maraval 1916 May 26 NL 45 M M Dutch Merchant Paramaribo Surinam Friend Jacques de VRIES, Paramaribo NASSY Adolf Mayaro 1916 Jul 28 Holland 45 M M Dutch Merchant Paramaribo Surinam Mr. P. NASSY, Heiligerwego St, Paramaribo NASSY Adolph Mayaro 1918 Oct 1 NY 47 M M W.Indian Merchant Paramaribo Surinam Mr. A.P. NASSY, Paramaribo NASSY Adolph PhilippusCoppename 1911 May 29 ENG 40 M M W. Indian Merchant Paramaribo Surinam NASSY Henri Mayaro 1918 Oct 1 NY 10 M S W.Indian Student Paramaribo Surinam Mr. A.P. NASSY, Paramaribo NASSY Joseph Mayaro 1918 Oct 1 NY 14 M S W.Indian Student Paramaribo Surinam Mr. A.P. NASSY, Paramaribo NASSY Joseph S. Oranje Nassau 1919 Jun 19 ENG 29 M S Hebrew Planter Paramaribo Surinam P.
  • Geophysical Analysis of the Alpha–Mendeleev Ridge Complex: Characterization of the High Arctic Large Igneous Province

    Geophysical Analysis of the Alpha–Mendeleev Ridge Complex: Characterization of the High Arctic Large Igneous Province

    Tectonophysics 691 (2016) 65–84 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Tectonophysics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/tecto Geophysical analysis of the Alpha–Mendeleev ridge complex: Characterization of the High Arctic Large Igneous Province G.N. Oakey a,⁎,R.W.Saltusb,1 a Geological Survey of Canada (Atlantic), PO 1006, B2Y 4A2 Dartmouth, NS, Canada b US Geological Survey, Mail Stop 964, Box 25046, Denver, CO 80225-0046, USA article info abstract Article history: The Alpha–Mendeleev ridge complex is a first-order physiographic and geological feature of the Arctic Amerasia Received 6 July 2015 Basin. High amplitude “chaotic” magnetic anomalies (the High Arctic Magnetic High Domain or HAMH) are associ- Received in revised form 30 June 2016 ated with the complex and extend beyond the bathymetric high beneath the sediment cover of the adjacent Canada Accepted 8 August 2016 and Makarov–Podvodnikov basins. Residual marine Bouguer gravity anomalies over the ridge complex have low Available online 11 August 2016 amplitudes implying that the structure has minimal lateral density variability. A closed pseudogravity (magnetic fi 6 2 Keywords: potential) contour around the ridge complex quanti es the aerial extent of the HAMH at ~1.3 × 10 km . Alpha Ridge We present 2D gravity/magnetic models for transects across the Alpha Ridge portion of the complex constrained Mendeleev Ridge with recently acquired seismic reflection and refraction data. The crustal structure is modeled with a simple High Arctic Large Igneous Province three-layer geometry. Large induced and remanent magnetization components were required to fittheobserved Magnetic domain magnetic anomalies. Density values for the models were based on available seismic refraction P-wave velocities.
  • Ecosystem Services for Poverty Alleviation in Amazonia

    Ecosystem Services for Poverty Alleviation in Amazonia

    Ecosystem Services for Poverty Alleviation in Amazonia A report of a capacity-building project to design a research agenda on the links between the natural capital of Amazonian forests and water, food, health, livelihood, climate and energy securities. – Global Canopy Programme – Grupo de Trabalho Amazônico – Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais – London School of Economics – Met Office Hadley Centre – Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro – Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina – Universidad Nacional de Colombia – University of Edinburgh – University of Oxford – University of1 Vermont This Report presents the activities and results of an ESPA capacity-building project (grant NE/G008531/1) entitled: Valuing rainforests as global eco-utilities: a novel mechanism to pay communities for ecosystem services provided by the Amazon. The project was led by the University of Edinburgh and the Global Canopy Programme in the UK; Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) and Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE) in Brazil; Universidad Nacional de Colombia (UNAL) and Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina (UNALM) in Peru in collaboration with a number of academic and NGO partners. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the organisations involved in this project, or those of its funders. Acknowledgements The project leaders would like to warmly thank all those who gave up their valuable time to engage in this capacity-building project. In particular, the members of the project team who committed their energies at workshops and meetings and through the writing of reports and project proposals. We especially thank the stakeholders in local communities and government who provided their insights into the process.
  • Caribbean Sub-Region 35 177K 141K 25K

    Caribbean Sub-Region 35 177K 141K 25K

    Caribbean Sub-Region Situation Report - March 2019 Caribbean Sub-Regional Refugee & Migrants Response Plan - Summary Figures Dominican Republic Trinidad and Guyana Aruba Curaçao Tobago 35 177K 141K 25K 35M Appealing Refugees & Refugees & Target Host Financial Partners Migrants in Need Migrants Targeted Community Requirements In recent years, five countries in the sub-region have been hosting growing numbers of refugees and migrants from Venezuela: Aruba, Curaçao, the Dominican Republic, Guyana, and Trinidad and Tobago. It is estimated that around 146,9001 have arrived by air, land, and sea to date, including some returnees in Guyana. Through the 2019 Regional Refugee and Migrants Response Plan (RRMRP), partners have identified the priority needs for both refugees/migrants, and host communities. These are: protection, shelter, access to food, adequate nutrition and health care, including psychosocial support, as well as the provision of livelihoods, and self-reliance opportunities. The RRMRP outlines the intended interventions to address these priority needs and their related financial requirements for the sub-region, in support to the response of national governments. Through the inter-agency coordination platforms (Refugee and Migrants Working Groups) that are being established at the sub-regional and national level, United Nations (UN) agencies, Non- Governmental Organizations (NGOs), and civil society aim to meet the emergency assistance, protection, and integration needs of refugees and migrants from Venezuela, in complementarity and support to existing government’s responses. KEY FIGURES (as of March 2019) Over 146,900 Venezuelans arrived in 11,855 Registered Venezuelan asylum seekers the Caribbean sub-region since 2015.1 in the Caribbean sub-region since 2015.2 No.
  • Structural Analysis of the Itapucumi Group In

    Structural Analysis of the Itapucumi Group In

    Our reference: SAMES 895 P-authorquery-v8 AUTHOR QUERY FORM Journal: SAMES Please e-mail or fax your responses and any corrections to: E-mail: [email protected] Article Number: 895 Fax: +31 2048 52789 Dear Author, Please check your proof carefully and mark all corrections at the appropriate place in the proof (e.g., by using on-screen annotation in the PDF file) or compile them in a separate list. For correction or revision of any artwork, please consult http://www.elsevier.com/artworkinstructions. Any queries or remarks that have arisen during the processing of your manuscript are listed below and highlighted by flags in the proof. Location Query / Remark: click on the Q link to go in article Please insert your reply or correction at the corresponding line in the proof Q1 Please ensure that affiliation “a”, affiliation address, and corresponding author’s information are complete and accurate. Q2 The reference “Grant, 1990” occurs in the reference list but not in the body of the text. Please cite this reference or alternatively delete it. Q3 Please provide an update for reference “Ramos et al., in press”. Thank you for your assistance. SAMES895_proof ■ 8 September 2010 ■ 1/11 Journal of South American Earth Sciences xxx (2010) 1e11 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of South American Earth Sciences journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jsames 1 56 2 Structural analysis of the Itapucumí Group in the Vallemí region, northern 57 3 58 4 Paraguay: Evidence of a new Brasiliano/Pan-African mobile belt 59 5 60
  • The West Indian Web Improvising Colonial Survival in Essequibo and Demerara, 1750-1800

    The West Indian Web Improvising Colonial Survival in Essequibo and Demerara, 1750-1800

    The West Indian Web Improvising colonial survival in Essequibo and Demerara, 1750-1800 Bram Hoonhout Thesis submitted for assessment with a view to obtaining the degree of Doctor of History and Civilization of the European University Institute Florence, 22 February 2017 European University Institute Department of History and Civilization The West Indian Web Improvising colonial survival in Essequibo and Demerara, 1750-1800 Bram Hoonhout Thesis submitted for assessment with a view to obtaining the degree of Doctor of History and Civilization of the European University Institute Examining Board Prof. dr. Jorge Flores (EUI) Prof. dr. Regina Grafe (EUI) Prof. dr. Cátia Antunes (Leiden University) Prof. dr. Gert Oostindie, KITLV/Royal Netherlands Institute of Southeast Asian and Caribbean Studies © Bram Hoonhout, 2017 No part of this thesis may be copied, reproduced or transmitted without prior permission of the author Researcher declaration to accompany the submission of written work Department of History and Civilization - Doctoral Programme I Bram Hoonhoutcertify that I am the author of the work The West Indian web. Improvising colonial survival in Essequibo and Demerara, 1750-1800 I have presented for examination for the Ph.D. at the European University Institute. I also certify that this is solely my own original work, other than where I have clearly indicated, in this declaration and in the thesis, that it is the work of others. I warrant that I have obtained all the permissions required for using any material from other copyrighted publications. I certify that this work complies with the Code of Ethics in Academic Research issued by the European University Institute (IUE 332/2/10 (CA 297).
  • A V~*» the URANIUM GEOLOGY and TECTONIC CORRELATION

    A V~*» the URANIUM GEOLOGY and TECTONIC CORRELATION

    •••, A v~*«^» í f >-v ,— / PER-58 THE URANIUM GEOLOGY AND TECTONIC CORRELATION BETWEEN THE AFRICAN AND LATIN AMERICAN CONTINENTS by P.D. Toens J.P. le Roux C.J.H. Hartnady W.J. van Biljon /| ATOMIC ENERGY BOARD _i, j Pelinclaha T> J! PRETORIA x | Republic of South Africa October 1980 8 .ii. ::iii!!:imi:::: gjpji, lip£.l.^....diyiii^..,».M!i» *ltji|ill I «•••*«••• •••«•If*III(**««*}«atja•*••••**•••*•***<*••••• «•(•I<>«lil«ll»»"<'->1 I.. !!::::i::!ii:J:i:: PER-58 THE URANIUM GEOLOGY AND TECTONIC CORRELATION BETWEEN THE AFRICAN AND LATIN AMERICAN CONTINENTS by P.D. Toens* J.P. le Roux* C.J.H. Hartnady** W.J. van Biljon*** *Geo1ogy Division POSTAL ADDRESS: Private Bag X256 PRETORIA 0001 **University of Cape Town ***Rand Afrikaans University PELINDABA October 1980 [OnÁQÍnaíly pfiuzntíd cu> an intoxÁm Kzpoht by thz South A^fvican Walking Gnoixp to thz IAEA Consultants' Mz&ting, Vienna, JLU.IJ 1980) ISBN 0 86960 720 0 PER-58-1 CONTINENTS, LIKE PEOPLE, CAW MO LONGER BE STUV1EV EFFECTIVELY IN/ ISOLATION. PER-58-2 MIEVATTIH8 CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT 1. GENERAL STATEMENT 7 2. INTRODUCTION 8 3. CORRELATION OF METALLOGENIC PROVINCES 11 4. PRE-DRIFT RECONSTRUCTION OF WEST GONDWANALAND 14 4.1 Accuracy and Precision of Reconstruction 14 4.2 Basic Review of Previous Reconstructions 15 4.3 Proposed New Reconstruction 16 5. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MAJOR URANIUM METALLOGENIC 18 PROVINCES AND GEOTECTONIC PROVINCES 6. PERMO-TRIASSIC GONDWANA BASINS 21 6.1 Tectonic Setting 21 6.2 Description of Uranium Deposits in Gondwana 30 (Karoo) Basins 6.2.1 Main Karoo Basin 30 6.2.2 Waterberg Basin 32 6.2.3 Botswana Basin 32 6.2.4 Limpopo Basin 33 6.2.5 Mozambique Basin 33 6.2.6 Etjo Basin 33 6.2.7 Ovambo Basin 33 6.2.8 Mid-Zambezi Basin 34 6.2.9 Lower-Zambezi Basin 35 6.2.10 Barotse Basin 35 6.2.11 Angola Basin 36 6.2.12 Luano-Luangwa Basin 36 6.2.13 East African Basin 36 6.2.14 Rukwa Basin 36 6.2.15 Congo Basin 37 6.2.16 Gabon Basin 37 6.2.17 Parana Basin (Southern Brazil) 37 6.2.18 Callingasta-Uspallata Basin (Argentina) 37 7.
  • 23085402.Pdf

    23085402.Pdf

    wooi Seventh Gondwana Symposium São Paulo, Brazil July 18-22, 1988 ABSTRACTS SPONSORING ORGANIZATIONS Subconmission on Gondwsna Stratigraphy, Conission on Stratigraphy, Inter- national Union of Geological Sciences (HJGS) Instituto de Geociências, Universidade de Sao Paulo, São Paulo Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. (PETROBRÁS), Rio de Janeiro Departamento Nacional da Produção Mineral (DNFM). Ministério das Minas e Emergia, Brasília Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP), São Paulo Secretaria da Ciência e Tecnologia do Estado de São Paulo Comissão InterraLnisterial para os Recursos do Mar (CIRM), Brasília Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Brasília Empresas Nucleares Brasileiras (NUCLEBRÁS), Rio de Janeiro Academia Brasileira de Ciências, Rio de Janeiro Sociedade Brasileira de Geologia, São Paulo Sociedade Brasileira de Geofísica, São Paulo Sociedade Brasileira de Paleontologia, são Paulo Centro de Investigação do Gondwana, Instituto de Geociências, Universida- de Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre Eliane - Azulejos e Pisos, Criciúma Lapis Joham Faber S/A, São Carlos Instituto Antártico Argentino, Buenos Aires Geologia e Sondagens Ltda (GEOSOL), Belo Horizonte OTHER CONTRIBUTIONS IGCP Project 260 Earth's glacial record IGCP Project 237 Floras of the Gondwanic continents LiSÍ of Contents Page Gondwana Plate margins and fragmentation history (IV) (Monday, July 18) 01-07 Gondwana basins (II) (Monday, July 18) 19-30 Gondwana biota and biostratigraphy (III) (Tuesday, July 19) 31-46 Crustal