Council Letter Template

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Council Letter Template Agenda Item 5 West Area Planning Committee 13th June 2017 Application Number: 17/00250/FUL Decision Due by: 24th May 2017 Proposal: Alterations for the continued use of the buildings as student accommodation comprising: External alterations to elevations and roofs of the existing buildings; tree planting (including containers and supporting structures); alterations to, and landscaping of the courtyards; new cycle stores; alterations to existing lighting; and the formation of pedestrian pathways on the east side of Blocks 5 and 8 and the three gatehouses. Site Address: Castle Mill, Roger Dudman Way (site plan: appendix 1) Ward: Jericho And Osney Ward Agent: Mr Nik Lyzba Applicant: Chancellor, Masters And Scholars Of The University Of Oxford Recommendation: The West Area Planning Committee are recommended to grant planning permission for the following reasons Reasons for Approval 1 It is considered that the proposed design mitigation strategy for the existing buildings will, on balance, provide some mitigation for the harm that has been caused to the significance, in particular to the settings of a number of high value heritage assets. The Environmental Statement has assessed the strategy in respect of the landscape and visual impacts, historic environmental impacts, and impacts on ecology and nature conservation and considers that there will be some beneficial effects from the measures on these matters. Similarly it is not considered to give rise to any impacts with respect to highway matters, land contamination, air quality, and archaeology and any such matters could be addressed by appropriately worded planning conditions. The proposal is considered to be acceptable in terms of the aims and objectives of the National Planning Policy Framework, and relevant policies of the Oxford Core Strategy 2026, Sites and Housing Plan 2011-2026, and Oxford Local Plan 2001-2016 REPORT 13 2 In considering the application, officers have had specific regard to the comments of third parties and statutory bodies in relation to the application. However officers consider that these comments have not raised any material considerations that would warrant refusal of the applications, and any harm identified could be successfully mitigated by appropriately worded conditions. 3 The Council considers that the proposal accords with the policies of the development plan as summarised below. It has taken into consideration all other material matters, including matters raised in response to consultation and publicity. Any material harm that the development would otherwise give rise to can be offset by the conditions imposed. Conditions 1 Development to commence within 6 months of date of permission in accordance with Unilateral Undertaking 2 Develop in accordance with approved plans and specifications within the ES and supporting documents 3 Samples of all materials 4 Landscaping carried out by completion 5 Submission of the Prescription Fertilization Plan 6 Revised Construction Traffic Management Plan and Phasing Plan 7 Securing on-site ecological expertise during construction 8 Badger run kept free from obstruction during construction 9 Cycle storage to provided as approved 10 Revised Land Contamination Report 11 Noise Assessment recommendations carried out 12 Mitigation measures for the supression of dust during construction 13 Details of sustainable urban drainage methods for hard surfacing 14 Details of all external lighting Principal Planning Policies: Oxford Local Plan 2001-2016 CP1 - Development Proposals CP6 - Efficient Use of Land & Density CP8 - Design Development to Relate to its Context CP9 - Creating Successful New Places CP10 - Siting Development to Meet Functional Needs CP11 - Landscape Design CP13 - Accessibility CP17 - Recycled Materials CP18 - Natural Resource Impact Analysis CP19 - Nuisance CP20 - Lighting CP21 - Noise CP22 - Contaminated Land CP23 - Air Quality Management Areas TR1 - Transport Assessment TR4 - Pedestrian & Cycle Facilities NE6 - Oxford's Watercourses REPORT 14 NE13 - Water Quality NE16 - Protected Trees NE20 - Wildlife Corridors HE1 - Nationally Important Monuments HE3 - Listed Buildings and Their Setting HE7 - Conservation Areas HE9 - High Building Areas HE10 - View Cones of Oxford Core Strategy CS2_ - Previously developed and greenfield land CS9_ - Energy and natural resources CS10_ - Waste and recycling CS11_ - Flooding CS12_ - Biodiversity CS13_ - Supporting access to new development CS17_ - Infrastructure and developer contributions CS18_ - Urban design, town character, historic environment CS19_ - Community safety CS25_ - Student accommodation Sites and Housing Plan MP1 - Model Policy HP5_ - Location of Student Accommodation HP11_ - Low Carbon Homes HP14_ - Privacy and Daylight HP15_ - Residential cycle parking HP16_ - Residential car parking Relevant Planning History 11/02881/FUL - Extension to existing student accommodation at Castle Mill to provide additional 312 postgraduate units consisting of 208 student study rooms, 90 x 1 bed graduate flats and 14 x 2 bed graduate flats, plus ancillary facilities, 360 covered cycle spaces and 3 car parking spaces. (Amended Plans): Approved 13th August 2012. 14/03013/FUL - Environmental Statement for the Roger Dudman Way Development Castle Mill. 14/03013/CONSLT - Environmental Statement Addendum and Substantive Additional Information for the Castle Mill development, Roger Dudman Way. Public Consultation Statutory Consultees Cherwell District Council: No objection REPORT 15 Oxford Preservation Trust The Trust was invited to various consultations as these proposals progressed writing to the University at the time with our thoughts. The current application is in keeping with these proposals and OPT feels they are an improvement on the present situation as the buildings will now be less starkly defined in the long views OPT has written to the University to ask them to commit to take down the buildings after 25 years of occupation, by the end of 2040. We also asked them to agree that any subsequent redevelopment on this site be well-designed and high-quality, enhancing the setting of Port Meadow and restoring the lost view from the Meadows to the spires of Oxford This should be made a condition of this planning application, ensuring that this harm is not everlasting and will not be repeated in the future. Vale Of White Horse DC: No comment Environment Agency Thames Region The proposal is unlikely to have a significant impact on groundwater quality given that this site has recently been developed and assessed environmentally. However, given that an oil pollution incident occurred in April 2013 in the area of the Badger Run we would request that a condition is imposed which seeks a watching brief for unexpected contamination. Oxfordshire County Council The application proposes the alterations for the continued use of the buildings as student accommodation comprising: External alterations to elevations and roofs of the existing buildings; tree planting (including containers and supporting structures); alterations to, and landscaping of the courtyards; new cycle stores; alterations to existing lighting; and the formation of pedestrian pathways on the east side of Blocks 5 and 8 and the three gatehouses. It is noted that the number of off-street car parking spaces will remain the same. The application proposes there will be new cycle stores which will increase the number cycle parking spaces by 38. These appear to be located in an appropriate and easily accessible location and must be secure, enclosed and undercover. We note a Construction Management Plan has been submitted. However, this will need to be amended to include the restriction of deliveries (restriction times 0730 - 0930 and 1630 - 1830). In addition there has to be a commitment to undertake a dilapidation survey of the junction between Roger Dudman Way and Botley road. This will need to be agreed with the Highways authority. Therefore the county council does not object this application subject to a condition requiring a construction traffic management plan Natural England: No comments to make on the application Department of Communities and Local Government: No comment to make on the Environmental Statement REPORT 16 Historic England Historic England has concerns regarding the application on heritage grounds. However, we do not advise changes to the designs as they have been presented, which are an improvement on the existing. This is of course a long-running case. The team submitting the current modifications to the Castle Mill buildings, Orme and Nicholas Pearson Associates, were not involved in the original application or design, and have done what they could to deliver 'Option 1' of the possible mitigation strategies for the design shortcomings of this poor scheme. HE agree that there would be some beneficial effect from the proposals, even on the setting St Barnabas Church, Jericho, which HE have identified as having suffered substantial harm to its significance through the effect on its setting. Still, that small beneficial effect must be set against the 'high adverse' effect identified by NPA from the current design: so this set of modifications is playing around at the edges of what has happened. In the case of St Barnabas, the colour range of the buildings would come closer to the colour range of the tower itself, rendering the contrast less stark; but the contrast in colour was not the worst thing about the juxtaposition of these large and repetitive buildings with the church. Their location and
Recommended publications
  • NR05 Oxford TWAO
    OFFICIAL Rule 10(2)(d) Transport and Works Act 1992 The Transport and Works (Applications and Objections Procedure) (England and Wales) Rules 2006 Network Rail (Oxford Station Phase 2 Improvements (Land Only)) Order 202X Report summarising consultations undertaken 1 Introduction 1.1 Network Rail Infrastructure Limited ('Network Rail') is making an application to the Secretary of State for Transport for an order under the Transport and Works Act 1992. The proposed order is termed the Network Rail (Oxford Station Phase 2 Improvements (Land Only)) Order ('the Order'). 1.2 The purpose of the Order is to facilitate improved capacity and capability on the “Oxford Corridor” (Didcot North Junction to Aynho Junction) to meet the Strategic Business Plan objections for capacity enhancement and journey time improvements. As well as enhancements to rail infrastructure, improvements to highways are being undertaken as part of the works. Together, these form part of Oxford Station Phase 2 Improvements ('the Project'). 1.3 The Project forms part of a package of rail enhancement schemes which deliver significant economic and strategic benefits to the wider Oxford area and the country. The enhanced infrastructure in the Oxford area will provide benefits for both freight and passenger services, as well as enable further schemes in this strategically important rail corridor including the introduction of East West Rail services in 2024. 1.4 The works comprised in the Project can be summarised as follows: • Creation of a new ‘through platform’ with improved passenger facilities. • A new station entrance on the western side of the railway. • Replacement of Botley Road Bridge with improvements to the highway, cycle and footways.
    [Show full text]
  • COUNCIL Monday 24 June 2013
    COUNCIL Monday 24 June 2013 COUNCILLORS PRESENT: Councillors Sinclair (Lord Mayor), Brett (Deputy Lord Mayor), Abbasi (Sheriff), Altaf-Khan, Armitage, Baxter, Benjamin, Brown, Campbell, Canning, Clack, Clarkson, Cook, Coulter, Curran, Darke, Fooks, Fry, Goddard, Gotch, Haines, Hollick, Humberstone, Kennedy, Khan, Lloyd- Shogbesan, Lygo, McCready, Mills, O'Hara, Pressel, Price, Rowley, Royce, Sanders, Seamons, Simmons, Smith, Tanner, Turner, Van Nooijen, Williams and Wolff. 11. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE Apologies for absence were received from Councillors Jones, Malik, Paule, Rundle and Wilkinson. 12. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST There were no declarations of interest from Councillors present at the meeting. 13. MINUTES (1) The Minutes of the Ordinary meeting of Council held on 22 nd April 2013 were agreed as a correct record and signed by the Lord Mayor. (2) The Minutes of the Annual meeting of Council held on 20 th May 2013 were agreed as a correct record and signed by the Lord Mayor. 14. APPOINTMENTS TO COMMITTEES There were no appointments to committees. 15. ANNOUNCEMENTS (1) Lord Mayor The Lord Mayor made four announcements as follows:- (a) A request to film the proceedings of Council had been received from a member of the public. Councillors discussed the request. Views ranged from noting that the meeting was filmed already and the outcome was placed on the Council’s website, through concern that private filming could result in extracts of that exercise being edited and used out of context to the view that council meetings should generally be fully opened to public scrutiny. The Lord Mayor noted that the request to film has only that day been received and the matter had not been discussed by the political groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Castle Mill, Roger Dudman
    University of Oxford Castle Mill Graduate Accommodation Review of Environmental Statement On behalf of Oxford City Council SLR Ref: 425.04519.00002 December 2014 Version: Rev 1 89 Oxford City Council i 425.04519.00002 University of Oxford – ES Review December 2014 CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction to ES Review Process ................................................................. 1 1.2 SLR Consulting ................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Scope of SLR’s work ........................................................................................ 1 1.4 Format of ES Review ........................................................................................ 2 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE AND SURROUNDINGS ............................................... 4 2.1 Surrounding Area and Designations ............................................................... 4 2.2 Future Changes ................................................................................................ 4 3.0 SCOPE OF THE ES ..................................................................................................... 5 3.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 5 3.2 Scoping and Consultations .............................................................................. 5 3.3 EIA Methodology .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Vegetation Dynamics on Port Meadow 4.1 History of Port Meadow
    4 Vegetation dynamics on Port Meadow 4.1 History of Port Meadow Port Meadow (132 ha) and Wolvercote Common (39 ha) (the Meadow) are adjacent commons lying on the River Thames flood-plain within Oxford City boundary (Map 2.5). They have been grazed since at least the Bronze Age and have never been ploughed. Shiplake Ditch forms the boundary between Port Meadow and Wolvercote Common. The common land and Hook Meadow form part of a larger Site of Special Scientific Interest first notified in 1952 and re-notified under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981. The Nature Conservancy Council’s citation (1983) states that the history of ecological interest in the Meadow was taken into account so the SSSI should be extended to the whole of Port Meadow with Wolvercote Common, with the exception of the Wolvercote allotment gardens. The Meadow is also important as a gene bank of species, particularly well adapted to heavy grazing, which have already been fundamental in the development of agricultural leys (McDonald forthcoming). In 2004, Port Meadow was confirmed as a Special Area of Conservation under European Union legislation because of the presence of Apium repens. The whole was registered as a Scheduled Ancient Monument in 1993 because there are the remains of six Bronze Age burials and three Iron Age settlement sites and field systems on the commons (Map 4.1). Both commons are owned or held in Trust by Oxford City Council and Oxfordshire County Council under Section 9 of the Commons Registration Act 1965. Under the same Act, the Freemen of Oxford and the Wolvercote Commoners registered grazing rights for 1,365 horses, 1,890 cattle, 6 donkeys, 48 ducks and 1,192 geese.
    [Show full text]
  • Oxford Canal Heritage Trail Guide
    Oxford Canal Heritage Trail Guide A city walk exploring the cultural and industrial heritage of the Oxford Canal Take a walk on a canal in the heart of the City of Oxford and discover a fascinating world outside of its dreaming spires! www.oxfordcanalheritage.org F O R D C X A O N E A L H T H L E I R A I T R A G E T Hythe Bridge 1 On the Heritage Trail The self-guided Oxford Canal Heritage Trail a thriving narrowboat community, canal is a linear walk along the Oxford Canal that locks, under ancient bridges along a green is approximately three miles (five kms) in corridor full of wildlife. On the trail you will total. You can begin either in Pocket Park learn why the canal was, and continues to just inside Hythe Bridge near the centre of be, so important, nationally as well as locally. Oxford City or at Ball’s Bridge in Wolvercote You will also find out why the canal was built, to the north of the city. There is the option who built it, who paid for it, and who pays of walking past Ball’s Bridge up to Duke’s for it now; the uses to which it was first put, Cut to complete the whole Trail although how its usefulness has changed overtime, you will have to return to near Balls Bridge how it could have been lost for ever, and the to get back into Oxford. However, unless the reasons for its revival. weather is poor, take your time and, whilst There is a large scale map of the Heritage you are walking, imagine the bustle of life on Trail at its start in Hythe Bridge Street this 200 year old canal when horses pulled (Ordnance Survey grid reference SU 508 working boats full of coal and other cargoes 064) and near the end of the trail at Ball’s to Oxford.
    [Show full text]
  • Rallying Speech May 2013
    Campaign to save Port Meadow: Presentation to CPRE June 2013 My name is Sushila Dhall, community campaigner and a founder member of the Campaign to Save Port Meadow, which CPRE is supporting. I joined CPRE recently on the basis of your care to protect this and other public green spaces in Oxfordshire. The Campaign to Save Port Meadow has become a high profile one, with a legal challenge from yourselves awaiting an outcome, and other legal action being discussed should a Judicial Review not be called for in response. The issues are many and seem to increase as time goes on, with numerous dubious issues in the planning process having come to light. I am here to give you a sense of the background to this campaign, how it started and where it came from. This time last year the view across Port Meadow was as it had been for centuries, with peaceful views all round of greenery and spires, with a few rooftops showing through as allowed by stringent planning rules. People were shocked to see that view suddenly change, when last September eight ugly blocks covered with scaffolding started rising from behind the mature leafy willows at the southern end of Port Meadow, and were already in those early weeks damaging the beautiful view of the Grade I listed St Barnabas tower. Last September the character of Port Meadow was fundamentally altered by the ugly intrusion of blocks which are too large and tall, too close together, too uniform, too visible. The precious sense of a place of relaxation and refuge that Port Meadow provided residents and students of this pressured town was being wiped away.
    [Show full text]
  • The Binsey Boat: a Post-Medieval Story of the Thames at Port Meadow, Oxford
    The Binsey Boat: a post-medieval story of the Thames at Port Meadow, Oxford By BRIAN DLRIIA\I, REBECCA BRISCO~ and COLIN McKEWA.\i SUMMARY ThiJ report de~cnbe.~ a small scale rescue of part oj a boat .mb}I'Ct to ,nltr erOSIOn, with quite unexpecttd tmplicatlOtlS for three areas of enquiry: lhe evolution of the OXfOl·d Thames from commercial waterlllay to l-twlrl! activitles; the challenge of H!constnulmg a po.mbly unique riller craft from sUUllI lIreas of ;l~ mneT htlll; ami rrf/ecllOn.. on Iht gtomorplwlogy oj ant oj t/" 1110,1 clase'-, siudied flood pllllns in Englami. 71" ,lory Jwrt,d m 2003 when cablmg workJ on tht east bank o[ thl' Thamt,~ at Medley exposed a boat eroding from the bank, flotrjLed to Oxford City Cou11cils archaeologist. The boat WlU oJ clench boll (onslnulion am1 .,./\ expo.sed rt"mam.s presmted a risk to bathers, ,~IOt'k and TWl/igatiou. In the context of Port MeadO'w's protuil'd stallu mul till w/.urtain age of the veSJel It U'(u cifar lIwl any ;,westigatLOn would have to be a carefulf.), dt-Hgned ,\0 as not to compromi.se the tJeSJel or its slIrrolllldmg.\. Wilh Iht aul oj Ihe EnglISh Hmtagt Manlwlt Team mu1 .• IIUUllts of II" OUDCE MSr m Lmui.;rap, Archat'ology COUNt', the boat was invt'Jtigated Irt earlyJwU! 200-1 along with a topographical, geophysual "nd t1wironmmtal illITII!) of lhe .surrounding arta. Tht boat was Itnl(lLit'ely titablishtd as a punt-likL tle.utl, approxl1Iwlely 20,6 m.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Oxford Sustainability Report
    5 tion W duc ate re r 7 on rb Ca 4 T 1 r a n v o i e t l a 8 c u d E University of Oxford Environmental W Sustainability a 3 s t 1 e g , Report n r i e s c a y h c c l r 2011/2012 i n u g p a e l n b d a r n e i a u t s s e u 1 S 0 2 1 s B g i n o i d d l i i v u e b r s e l i t b y a 1 n i 1 a t s u Sustainability S in colleges 15 BACK TO University of Oxford Environmental Sustainability Report 2011/12 2 CONTENTS Vice-Chancellor’s introduction This is the University’s second Environmental Sustainability Report, compiled by the “As Chair of the Sustainability Steering Group, University’s Sustainability Team. The report covers the University’s performance in I have seen a significant shift in staff and carbon emissions, business travel, water consumption, sustainable buildings, material students’ expectations of environmental resources, biodiversity and sustainable purchasing. It also sustainability over the past year. Energy We hope this highlights the diverse sustainability initiatives across the estate efficiency and carbon reduction are now report will help and future projects planned for 2013 onwards. considered ‘business as usual’ and an increasing number of staff want to reuse unwanted to communicate We hope this report will help to communicate the environmental office items rather than throw them away.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Impact Assessment – Environmental Statement: Chapter 13 – Traffic and Transport 163390-JAC-REP-EEN-130000 Revision A01
    OFFICIAL Network Rail Oxford Corridor Phase 2 Capacity Improvement Scheme Environmental Impact Assessment – Environmental Statement: Chapter 13 – Traffic and Transport 163390-JAC-REP-EEN-130000 Revision A01 Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 Network Rail Oxford Corridor Phase 2 Capacity Improvement Scheme Environmental Impact Assessment – Environmental Statement: Chapter 13 – Traffic and Transport Document Reference 163390-JAC-REP-EEN-130000 Author Jacobs Date Jun 2021 Revision Number A01 OFFICIAL Network Rail Oxford Corridor Phase 2 Capacity Improvement Scheme Environmental Impact Assessment – Environmental Statement: Chapter 13 – Traffic and Transport 163390-JAC-REP-EEN-130000 Revision A01 Environmental Impact Assessment – Environmental Statement: Chapter 13 – Traffic and Transport Document Version Control Version Date Author Reviewer Approver A01 Jun 2021 G. Thomas A. Mileham A. Naik Report for: Authored by: Network Rail Jacobs SN1 1180 Eskdale Rd Station Road Winnersh Swindon Reading SN11DG RG41 5TU © Copyright 2021 . The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Network Rail. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of constitutes an infringement of copyright. Limitation: This document has been prepared on behalf of Network Rail, and for the exclusive use of Network Rail, and is subject to, and issued in accordance with, the provisions of the contract between Jacobs and the Network Rail. Jacobs accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect of, any use of, or reliance upon, this document by any third party. OFFICIAL Network Rail Oxford Corridor Phase 2 Capacity Improvement Scheme Environmental Impact Assessment – Environmental Statement: Chapter 13 – Traffic and Transport 163390-JAC-REP-EEN-130000 Revision A01 Contents 13.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography Sources for Further Reading May 2011 National Trust Bibliography
    Bibliography Sources for further reading May 2011 National Trust Bibliography Introduction Over many years a great deal has been published about the properties and collections in the care of the National Trust, yet to date no single record of those publications has been established. The following Bibliography is a first attempt to do just that, and provides a starting point for those who want to learn more about the properties and collections in the National Trust’s care. Inevitably this list will have gaps in it. Do please let us know of additional material that you feel might be included, or where you have spotted errors in the existing entries. All feedback to [email protected] would be very welcome. Please note the Bibliography does not include minor references within large reference works, such as the Encyclopaedia Britannica, or to guidebooks published by the National Trust. How to use The Bibliography is arranged by property, and then alphabetically by author. For ease of use, clicking on a hyperlink will take you from a property name listed on the Contents Page to the page for that property. ‘Return to Contents’ hyperlinks will take you back to the contents page. To search by particular terms, such as author or a theme, please make use of the ‘Find’ function, in the ‘Edit’ menu (or use the keyboard shortcut ‘[Ctrl] + [F]’). Locating copies of books, journals or specific articles Most of the books, and some journals and magazines, can of course be found in any good library. For access to rarer titles a visit to one of the country’s copyright libraries may be necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • Cripley Meadow Allotments
    You can tour our award Our Open Day is usually in August Cripley Meadow on the last Sunday of National winning plots & the Cripley Allotments Island Orchard on Open Days Allotment Week so do Come and www.cripleymeadow.org.uk visit Cripley Island Orchard The orchard was established by our If you are interested in becoming a member, members with funding from the Big Lottery Healthy , productive leisure time! please get in touch and we will arrange a 2009-2011 We have planted over 90 visit and a plot as soon as we can. Generally heritage apple trees. Our members are we find we can accommodate new members responsible for maintaining the island and within a season. All new members have to do the site by contributing 3 hours site work per a tour of the site before they can be offered member per year or by making a £15 a plot. We do our best to keep our waiting donation list down by developing communal plots. Contact: [email protected] www.cripleymeadow.org.uk Come and see a wide range of plots Cripley Meadow Allotment Association has with a diversity of approaches to growing provided local people with space to grow fruit, flowers, vegetables, and supporting their own vegetables, fruit and flowers since insects, and birds. approximately 1891. Large parts of the original site were The benefits of allotments are neglected for many years in the last decades Located at the end of Walton Well Road, • providing a sustainable food supply of the 20thC, but an ambitious reclamation Oxford and ticketed parking is available • healthy activity for people of all ages project was begun by the members in 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Significance of Broad and Historic Landscape Character (HLC) Types in Oxfordshire
    OXFORDSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL Understanding The Significance of Broad and Historic Landscape Character (HLC) Types in Oxfordshire Abi Tompkins, HLC Officer [email protected] (in post and able to field enquiries until 27th July 2017) This report is to be used alongside the geospatial data which maps both Broad and HLC Types within Oxfordshire. It gives an overview of the county’s character and indicates patterns of landscape use. It should be used to assess the significance of landscape character types in any given part of the county and should inform decision making by providing the background against which individuals can better understand the landscapes they are researching. Oxfordshire Historic Landscape Characterisation 1 Contents How to use HLC Data ............................................................................................. 5 Broad Character Types ........................................................................................... 6 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 6 Broad Type: Civic Amenities .............................................................................. 9 Broad Type: Civil Provision .............................................................................. 11 Broad Type: Commercial ................................................................................. 13 Broad Type: Communication............................................................................ 15 Broad Type: Enclosure
    [Show full text]