DOCSLIB.ORG

Roger Dudman Way Review MAIN REPORT & EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Roger Dudman Way Review MAIN REPORT & EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Agenda Item 3 Roger Dudman Way Review MAIN REPORT & EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Report of Findings and Recommendations Vincent Goodstadt December 2013 1 Roger Dudman Way Review: Main Report Contents Foreword Abbreviations Executive Summary Main Report A. The Approach to the Review B. The Planning Context C. Questions for the Review D. Planning Procedures E. Consultation Processes F. Visual Impact & Design Issues G. Committee Reporting H. Ground Contamination and Planning Conditions I. Wider Planning Implications J. General Conclusions and Recommendations Appendices A. Terms of Reference of the Cross-party Working Group B. List of persons Consulted C. Status of Planning Conditions D. Approved and Adopted development Plan Documents E. Documents Submitted Compared with Validation Requirements F. Environmental Impact Assessment Screening Checklist G. Government Guidance on Design and Access Statements H. Diagrams from Core Strategy I. DCLG Coding of Development Types from April 2008 (extract) 2 1 FOREWORD In February 2012 Oxford City Council approved a proposal by the University of Oxford for post-graduate student accommodation at Castle Mill, Roger Dudman Way. In December 2012 a Petition was submitted to the Council expressing the widespread concern about the environmental impacts of the development. As a result the Council set up a Working Party to consider whether the planning processes associated with the Roger Dudman Way application complied with statutory and national policy requirements, and how they related to best practice. This Working Party is cross-party and includes representatives of key civic organisations. As part of its considerations an independent review has been undertaken of the processes involved. Great weight has been placed in the review process upon engaging with all sectors of the planning community in Oxford (including civic and community groups, the universities and public bodies). This report sets out the findings and recommendations arising from this independent review. Its focus has been to draw lessons and make recommendations on the procedures and policies for handling and determining major planning applications. In doing so it identifies: good practice that is already being applied by the Council; the range of actions already being taken by the Council to address the issues that have been raised; and the opportunities for the City Council to improve services and minimise the risk of problems in the future. This review has been undertaken within a tight timescale. I would like to acknowledge the cooperation that I have received from all quarters in undertaking the review, the organisation of briefings and background material, and making time available. In particular I want to acknowledge the support given by Pat Jones (Senior Scrutiny Officer) and Dr. Lucy Natarajan. Vincent Goodstadt December 2013 3 2 ABBREVIATIONS BIC Building in Context by EH & CABE CABE The Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment CPRE Campaign to Protect Rural England DAS Design and Access Statement DCLG Department of Communities and Local Government DPD Development Plan Document EA Environment Agency ED Environment Department of Oxford City Council EH English Heritage EIA Environmental Impact Assessment LGA Local Government Association MR Main Report of the Roger Dudman Way Review NPPF National Planning Policy Framework OAHS Oxford Architectural and Historical Society OCC Oxford City Council OCS Oxford Civic Society OPT Oxford Preservation Trust PAS Planning Advisory Service POS Planning Officers’ Society PPS Planning Policy Statement RDW Roger Dudman Way ROQ Royal Observatory Quarter SAC Special Area of Conservation under the EU’s Habitats Directive SLA Service Level Agreement SPM Save Port Meadow Campaign SSSI Site of Special Scientific interest WAPC West Area Planning Committee 1990 Act Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 4 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 Context 1. In February 2012 Oxford City Council approved a proposal by the University of Oxford for post- graduate student accommodation at Castle Mill, Roger Dudman Way. In December 2012 a Petition was submitted to the Council expressing the widespread concern about the environmental impacts of the development 2. As a result it established an Independent Review to assess whether in the context of this development the City Council complied with its planning processes and met statutory and National Policy requirements, how the processes compare with other Local Planning Authorities, and identification of best practice. 3. This Review addresses issues related to the planning process, consultation, visual impacts, committee reporting and the enforcement of planning conditions. It is not however an Inquiry as undertaken by the Planning Inspectorate. It therefore does not alter the decision to approve the application by Oxford City Council. Any recommendation in this report about better practices and procedures does not imply that it would, with the benefit of hindsight, have led to a different decision on the application. 4. The Review process has been substantially enhanced by the help and cooperation from a wide range of interested parties (including members, staff, supporters and objectors). This is gratefully acknowledged. The Review has also drawn on best practice advice from government or its agencies. The Planning Context 5. Roger Dudman Way (RDW) is located on the edge of the built up area, adjoining the greenbelt and Port Meadow, an area of ancient common land, and protected as an SAC and SSSI and for the views it gives of the city. 6. A range of planning permissions have also been granted for the site. These include an outline application for up to 650 bed space units in 2000; detailed application for 354 flats in 2002.The first phase of this consent for 125 flats was built and completed around 2004. There was therefore an extant consent to build a further 229 more student flats. None of the parties to this Review dispute the use of the site for student accommodation. 7. The site however raised environmental sensitivities particularly in terms of contamination and visual impact. In addition to national guidance and policies, the key document at the time of the West Area Planning Committee (WAPC) decision was the Oxford Core Strategy 2026 and its related documents. Central to an understanding of the planning context of the RDW site is Policy CS25 and the saved heritage Policy HE10 ‘View Cones of Oxford’. Policy CS25 requires that the number of students attending the University of Oxford living outside college does not exceed 3000 students. Policy HE10 requires the view of the Oxford skyline to be protected. 8. The WAPC approved the application with 23 planning conditions. Nine conditions still need to be discharged of which Condition No. 16 ‘Ground Contamination and Conditions 5 & 7 relating to landscaping’ are material to the key issues addressed in this Review . 6 ii Issue 1: Planning Procedures 9. During 2011 Oxford University carried out pre-application consultations and held a public exhibition. Following the submission of the application the City Council undertook a series of steps in processing the application including registering, validation, screening for the need for an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), public adverts and notices, statutory consultations and site visits. These steps were in accord with the statutory procedures required by regulations and in line with those generally used by the Council. 10. However there have been challenges, directly or implicitly, over the way the processes were carried out. The procedures therefore have been reviewed and the following conclusions drawn : a. The pre-applications policy of the Council is in accord with Government advice but as implemented in this instance fell short of best practice. The application could have been more clearly documented in terms of the general liaison with applicant and the formal pre-application process; b. The registration of the application was in accord with the Council’s published policy on v alidation requirements. Although there were errors and Recommendation 1: Planning Procedures limitations in the documents submitted by the It is recommended that the planning applicant, it was within the Council’s discretion to processes should be strengthened by validate the application. However there is a need a. Improving the clarity of the informal for a clearer auditing of the submitted documents and formal liaison arrangements on major applications against the requirements in and the documentation of the pre- the published guidance. application process; c. Although the application for judicial review was b. Providing a clearer auditing regime of unsuccessful, there is a commitment by the the submitted documents against the applicant to prepare a voluntary Environmental requirements in the published Statement. This Review has focused its guidance in the registration process on major applications; considerations on the lessons for best practice. In this context it has been concluded that the c. A review the EIA-related procedures screening process could have set out more in terms of: systematically the full basis of the evaluation and The advice provided in pre- conclusions. application discussions; Improving the quality of the forms d. The review has considered whether the Planning and documentation used; and (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 The training and briefing of should have been taken into account. It is officers in respect of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NR05 Oxford TWAO
    OFFICIAL Rule 10(2)(d) Transport and Works Act 1992 The Transport and Works (Applications and Objections Procedure) (England and Wales) Rules 2006 Network Rail (Oxford Station Phase 2 Improvements (Land Only)) Order 202X Report summarising consultations undertaken 1 Introduction 1.1 Network Rail Infrastructure Limited ('Network Rail') is making an application to the Secretary of State for Transport for an order under the Transport and Works Act 1992. The proposed order is termed the Network Rail (Oxford Station Phase 2 Improvements (Land Only)) Order ('the Order'). 1.2 The purpose of the Order is to facilitate improved capacity and capability on the “Oxford Corridor” (Didcot North Junction to Aynho Junction) to meet the Strategic Business Plan objections for capacity enhancement and journey time improvements. As well as enhancements to rail infrastructure, improvements to highways are being undertaken as part of the works. Together, these form part of Oxford Station Phase 2 Improvements ('the Project'). 1.3 The Project forms part of a package of rail enhancement schemes which deliver significant economic and strategic benefits to the wider Oxford area and the country. The enhanced infrastructure in the Oxford area will provide benefits for both freight and passenger services, as well as enable further schemes in this strategically important rail corridor including the introduction of East West Rail services in 2024. 1.4 The works comprised in the Project can be summarised as follows: • Creation of a new ‘through platform’ with improved passenger facilities. • A new station entrance on the western side of the railway. • Replacement of Botley Road Bridge with improvements to the highway, cycle and footways.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX I Report of the Ward Boundary Review Working Group To
    APPENDIX I Report of the Ward Boundary Review Working Group to CEB – 20th March 2018 Criteria Used This submission uses the following principles as criteria for the proposed scheme, in addition to the legally required criteria for equality of electorates: the river Cherwell and the river Thames south of the confluence with the Cherwell should be used as boundaries between wards that wards should be based on clearly identifiable communities or collections of communities as far as possible to use arterial roads as the centre of wards rather than boundaries between them where possible – in several parts of the city it is not - current wards should be the starting point for the new scheme Number of Councillors In line with the submission from the Council that has been accepted by the Commission, the scheme is for 48 councillors. Number of Wards Oxford currently has a scheme of 24 two member wards, which has been in place since 2002. This approach replaced the previous system of 17 larger wards, and was supported by the Council and the Commission because a larger number of smaller wards had the following advantages: smaller wards offer better community identity with the political boundaries in multi-member wards all electors rightly expect that each councillor is equally representative of them, and a two-member ward scheme means that each councillor represents 33% fewer electors than a three-member ward scheme, enabling them to be more responsive to the needs of their electors wards make it easier for electors to identify with their councillors the communities that make up Oxford better suit 24 two-member wards than they do any other scheme The experience of the current two member ward system has amply demonstrated these advantages; therefore a 24 ward scheme should be retained.
    [Show full text]
  • Living with New Developments in Jericho and Walton Manor
    LIVING WITH NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN JERICHO AND WALTON MANOR A discussion paper examining the likely impacts upon the neighbourhood of forthcoming and expected developments Paul Cullen – November 2010 1. Introduction 2. Developments approved or planned 3. Likely effects of the developments 3.1 More people living in the area. 3.2 More people visiting the area daily 3.3 Effects of construction 4. Likely outcomes of more residents and more visitors 4.1 More activity in the neighbourhood every day 4.2 More demand for shops, eating, drinking and entertainment 4.3 More vehicles making deliveries and servicing visits to the area 4.4 More local parking demand 4.5 Demand for places at local schools will grow 5. Present day problems in the neighbourhood 5.1 The night-time economy – and litter 5.2 Transient resident population 5.3 Motor traffic congestion and air pollution 5.4 Narrow and obstructed footways 6. Wider issues of travel and access 6.1 Lack of bus links between the rail station and Woodstock Road 6.2 Lack of a convenient pedestrian/cycle link to the rail station and West End 6.3 The need for travel behaviour change 7. The need for a planning led response 7.1 Developer Contributions 7.2 How should developers contribute? 7.3 What are the emerging questions? 8. Next steps – a dialogue between the community, planners and developers 1 LIVING WITH NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN JERICHO AND WALTON MANOR A discussion paper examining the likely impacts upon the neighbourhood of forthcoming and expected developments 1. Introduction Many new developments are planned or proposed in or near Jericho and these will have a substantial impact on the local community.
    [Show full text]
  • 219270 52 Kingston Road.Indd
    52 KINGSTON ROAD Oxford, OX2 6RH Modern Victorian townhouse with side access and west-facing garden Entrance hall Double reception room Open plan kitchen/breakfast room 3/4 bedrooms Bathroom Shower room Cloakroom Side access Garden EPC=D Photographs taken and details prepared September 2018 Situation Kingston Road lies in the sought after conservation area of Walton Manor. There is good access to Oxford city centre and the amenities of North Oxford and Summertown, as well as the popular restaurants and Phoenix cinema in nearby Walton Street. It is within an 1 ¼ mile radius of the city centre and Oxford mainline train station, and there is also access to Oxford Parkway, with a regular service to London Marylebone. The property is also well located for all the popular North and central Oxford schools, and the open spaces of Port Meadow are within a ¼ mile radius. Directions From Oxford city centre proceed north along Walton Street and continue onto Kingston Road. The property will be found on the left hand side. Description An attractive Victorian townhouse which has been extended and improved to provide a comfortable family home with a light interior and flexible accommodation arranged over four floors. On the ground floor, the entrance hall leads to the welcoming double reception room with a bay window to the front and feature window at the rear looking through the kitchen to the gardens beyond. The open-plan kitchen/breakfast room is particularly light with bi-folding doors opening to the garden. On the lower ground floor is a study/bedroom, which benefits from extra light created by extending the light-well to the front, and a shower room.
    [Show full text]
  • Samuel Lipscomb Seckham
    Samuel Lipscomb Seckham By PETER HOWELL l TIL recently the name of Samuel Lipscomb Seckham was fairly widely U known in Oxford as that of the architect of Park Town. A few other facts, such as that he was City Surveyor, were known to the cognoscenti. No-one, however, had been able to discover anything significant about his background, let alone what happened to him after he built the Oxford Corn Exchange in 1861-2. In '970 a fortunate chance led to the establishment of contact with Dr. Ann Silver, a great-granddaughter of Seckham, and as a result it has been po ible to piece together the outline ofhis varied career.' He was born on 25 October ,827,' He took his names from his grandparents, Samuel Seckham (1761-1820) and Susan Lipscomb (d. 18'5 aged 48).3 His father, William ('797-,859), kept livery stables at 20 Magdalen Street, Oxford,. and prospered sufficiently to retire and farm at Kidlington.5 The family came from Devon, where it is aid that Seccombes have occupied Seccombe Farm at Germans­ week, near Okehampton, since Saxon limes. Seccombes are still living there, farming. It is thought that Seckllam is the earlier spelling, but tombstones at Germansweek show several different versions. 6 It is not known how the family reached Oxford, but Samuel Lipscomb Seckham's great-grandmother Elizabeth was buried at St. Mary Magdalen in 1805.7 His mother was Harriett Wickens (1800-1859). Her grandfather and father were both called James, which makes it difficult to sort out which is which among the various James W;ckens' recorded in I The fortunate chance occurred when Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Jericho and Walton Manor Traffic Pilot Scheme Frequently Asked Questions
    Oxfordshire County Council Jericho and Walton Manor Traffic Pilot Scheme Frequently Asked Questions 1. Why propose the traffic scheme? Traffic jams, lorries and speeding vehicles in our local streets is bad for our health and environment. Enabling more people to feel safe and confident cycling and walking helps to address these issues. Over the past year, public health challenges and alterations to how we live day-to-day (e.g social distancing) have accelerated and given additional importance to supporting more people to walk and cycle as part of their daily lives. Making the streets feel safer and more welcoming to walk and cycle in is part of a programme of measures proposed by both Oxfordshire County Council (local highway authority) and Oxford City Council. The programme includes Connecting Oxford, expansion of Controlled Parking Zones, and infrastructure projects on roads (e.g Botley Road). 2. Who is behind the proposal? Oxfordshire County Council are the local highway authority so we lead this work. We are working with Oxford City Council to deliver a programme of measures to support people in shifting journeys to public transport, walking and cycling where possible. This programme includes Connecting Oxford, expansion of Controlled Parking Zones, the Oxford Zero Emission Zone and making changes to streets to make them safer (e.g Botley Road). 3. What happens to the existing traffic filter on Walton Street at the Worcester Street junction? Walton Street has been closed to all motor vehicle traffic at its junction with Worcester Street since July 2019. Initially the road was closed to motorised vehicles to allow maintenance work on Walton Street following the discovery of sink holes underneath the road.
    [Show full text]
  • Council Letter Template
    Agenda Item 5 West Area Planning Committee 13th June 2017 Application Number: 17/00250/FUL Decision Due by: 24th May 2017 Proposal: Alterations for the continued use of the buildings as student accommodation comprising: External alterations to elevations and roofs of the existing buildings; tree planting (including containers and supporting structures); alterations to, and landscaping of the courtyards; new cycle stores; alterations to existing lighting; and the formation of pedestrian pathways on the east side of Blocks 5 and 8 and the three gatehouses. Site Address: Castle Mill, Roger Dudman Way (site plan: appendix 1) Ward: Jericho And Osney Ward Agent: Mr Nik Lyzba Applicant: Chancellor, Masters And Scholars Of The University Of Oxford Recommendation: The West Area Planning Committee are recommended to grant planning permission for the following reasons Reasons for Approval 1 It is considered that the proposed design mitigation strategy for the existing buildings will, on balance, provide some mitigation for the harm that has been caused to the significance, in particular to the settings of a number of high value heritage assets. The Environmental Statement has assessed the strategy in respect of the landscape and visual impacts, historic environmental impacts, and impacts on ecology and nature conservation and considers that there will be some beneficial effects from the measures on these matters. Similarly it is not considered to give rise to any impacts with respect to highway matters, land contamination, air quality, and archaeology and any such matters could be addressed by appropriately worded planning conditions. The proposal is considered to be acceptable in terms of the aims and objectives of the National Planning Policy Framework, and relevant policies of the Oxford Core Strategy 2026, Sites and Housing Plan 2011-2026, and Oxford Local Plan 2001-2016 REPORT 13 2 In considering the application, officers have had specific regard to the comments of third parties and statutory bodies in relation to the application.
    [Show full text]
  • Castle Mill, Roger Dudman
    University of Oxford Castle Mill Graduate Accommodation Review of Environmental Statement On behalf of Oxford City Council SLR Ref: 425.04519.00002 December 2014 Version: Rev 1 89 Oxford City Council i 425.04519.00002 University of Oxford – ES Review December 2014 CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction to ES Review Process ................................................................. 1 1.2 SLR Consulting ................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Scope of SLR’s work ........................................................................................ 1 1.4 Format of ES Review ........................................................................................ 2 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE AND SURROUNDINGS ............................................... 4 2.1 Surrounding Area and Designations ............................................................... 4 2.2 Future Changes ................................................................................................ 4 3.0 SCOPE OF THE ES ..................................................................................................... 5 3.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 5 3.2 Scoping and Consultations .............................................................................. 5 3.3 EIA Methodology .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ANNEX 4A – Email Responses
    1 ANNEX 4a – Email Responses RESPONDENT VIEW COMMENTS Key Stakeholders/Groups I accept this junction has been closed for a number of weeks due to road maintenance, however any longer- term proposal to restrict vehicular traffic is NOT supported. 1. Emergency response times for ALL Emergency services to this area will increase and detrimental to public Thames Valley Police Object safety. 2. Walton Street is currently a defined Diversion route for Blue light services and other vehicles during closures of St Giles. Alternative Diversions much longer and detrimental in terms of Emergency response to North Oxford. Can see this would be beneficial to the residents of Walton street, I do have some concerns regarding Emergency access. Since the current closure has been in place, we have attended quite a few minor incidents, and the only Fire & Rescue Service, access has been via St Giles and little clarendon street or St Margret’s road for the Hydraulic Platform (due (Rewley Road & Slade Concerns to the size and amount of swing on the vehicle) Park White Watch) Whilst I am not opposed to a temporary traffic closure trial myself, I would personally like the ability to access via a transponder and a bollard or some other mechanism that we could breach? Obviously, a sign would do the same, but would state only emergency vehicles have access. During the current road closures on Walton Street, our appliances have been significantly delayed in attending properties down Walton Street and the surrounding side roads/Port Meadow because of high traffic levels, tight roads for the diversion and the length of time it takes us to get to suitable diversion routes that are listed in the consultation map.
    [Show full text]
  • Walton Manor
    OXFORDSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL (GIRDLESTONE ROAD) (CONTROLLED PARKING ZONE AND WAITING RESTRICTIONS) (VARIATION No.10) ORDER 2019 The Oxfordshire County Council (“the Council”) in exercise of its powers under Sections 1(1), 2(1), 2(2), 4(2), 32(1), 35(1), 37, 45, 46, 49(4) and 53 of and Part IV of Schedule 9 to the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 ("the Act") and of all enabling powers, and after consultation with the Chief Officer of Police in accordance with Part III of Schedule 9 to the Act, make the following Order: 1. This Order may be cited as The Oxfordshire County Council (Girdlestone Road) (Controlled Parking Zone and Waiting Restrictions) (Variation No.10) Order 2019 shall come into force on the eighth day of April 2019. 2. (2) Any reference in this Order to any enactment shall be construed as a reference to that enactment as amended or replaced by any subsequent enactment (3) The restrictions imposed by this Order shall be in addition to and not in derogation from any restriction or requirement imposed by any other enactment (4) Words importing the masculine gender shall also include the feminine gender and words in the singular include the plural and vice versa. (5) Any reference in this Order to a numbered Article shall unless the context otherwise requires be construed as a reference to the numbered Article bearing that number in this Order. 3. The Oxfordshire County Council (Girdlestone Road) (Controlled Parking Zone and Waiting Restrictions) Order 2006, as amended by The Oxfordshire County Council (Headington Quarry, Girdlestone
    [Show full text]
  • 19 Hayfield Road Oxford OX2 6TX 19 Hayfield Road Oxford OX2 6TX
    19 Hayfield Road Oxford OX2 6TX 19 Hayfield Road Oxford OX2 6TX DESCRIPTION Located in this sought after area with a west facing garden leading down to the Oxford Canal, this charming Victorian terraced property, built to a design by H W Moore in around 1888, has been extended to the rear and has the added benefit of a home office at the end of the garden enjoying an outlook over the canal. The accommodation, which is arranged over two floors with a large storage attic room in addition, comprises entrance hall, double reception with two fireplaces, kitchen with a breakfast area and a conservatory/garden room beyond providing a lovely view over the garden and to the canal. At first floor level are a landing, two bedrooms and a bathroom. The property enjoys a pretty garden to the rear, which leads down to the home office and a canal-side seating terrace. SITUATION The property is situated in the Conservation area of Walton Manor, within walking distance of Port Meadow and the day to day shopping facilities of Walton Street including restaurants, bars and a cinema. Slightly further afield are the more comprehensive facilities of Oxford City centre, University departments and a range of schools for all ages. The location is within the Phil & Jim school catchment and Cherwell School Catchment area. There is also a choice of train stations including Oxford Parkway with direct links to London Marylebone and Oxford mainline station with access to London Paddington. There is easy access to the Oxford ring road connecting to the A34, A40 and M40 to London.
    [Show full text]
  • The Oxfordshire County Council (Oxford - Car Club Parking Places) Order 2010
    THE OXFORDSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL (OXFORD - CAR CLUB PARKING PLACES) ORDER 2010 Julia/TROs/Oxford Car Club Parking Order FINAL FORM 9.8 cleaned 19.8 THE OXFORDSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL (OXFORD – CAR CLUB PARKING PLACES) ORDER 2010 The Oxfordshire County Council (“the Council”) in exercise of its powers under Sections 32(1), 35(1), 37, 45, 46, 49(4) and 53 of and Part IV of Schedule 9 to the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 ("the Act") and of all other enabling powers, and after consultation with the Chief Officer of Police in accordance with Part III of Schedule 9 to the Act, make the following Order:– PART 1 GENERAL Citation and Commencement 1. This Order shall come into operation on 27 August 2010 and may be cited as "The Oxfordshire County Council (Oxford – Car Club Parking Places) Order 2010”. Definitions 2. In this Order, except where the context otherwise requires, the following expressions have the following meanings:– “Authorised Zone” means the relevant Zone in which a Zone Club Operator has been authorised by the Council to manage and administer the allocation and use of Car Club Permits for some or all of the Car Club Parking Places in that Zone; “Car Club” means an organisation that (a) manages and administers a car club for the purpose of hiring passenger vehicles to subscribers to that organisation; and (b) has been accredited nationally by Carplus or by another national organisation promoted by the Secretary of State for Transport. “Car Club Parking Places” means any length of road specified in Schedule 1 to this Order (but excluding
    [Show full text]