DOCSLIB.ORG

University of Oxford Sustainability Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

5 tion W duc ate re r 7 on rb Ca 4 T 1 r a n v o i e t l a 8 c u d E University of Oxford Environmental W Sustainability a 3 s t 1 e g , Report n r i e s c a y h c c l r 2011/2012 i n u g p a e l n b d a r n e i a u t s s e u 1 S 0 2 1 s B g i n o i d d l i i v u e b r s e l i t b y a 1 n i 1 a t s u Sustainability S in colleges 15 BACK TO University of Oxford Environmental Sustainability Report 2011/12 2 CONTENTS Vice-Chancellor’s introduction This is the University’s second Environmental Sustainability Report, compiled by the “As Chair of the Sustainability Steering Group, University’s Sustainability Team. The report covers the University’s performance in I have seen a significant shift in staff and carbon emissions, business travel, water consumption, sustainable buildings, material students’ expectations of environmental resources, biodiversity and sustainable purchasing. It also sustainability over the past year. Energy We hope this highlights the diverse sustainability initiatives across the estate efficiency and carbon reduction are now report will help and future projects planned for 2013 onwards. considered ‘business as usual’ and an increasing number of staff want to reuse unwanted to communicate We hope this report will help to communicate the environmental office items rather than throw them away. the environmental sustainability message across the University to staff, students, The University is under increasing pressure sustainability visitors and stakeholders. We all need to do our bit to help the to demonstrate sustainability performance – message across University continually improve its environmental performance. for example the Higher Education Statistics the University Many of the sustainability initiatives in the report also have social Agency (HESA) greenhouse gas reporting and economic benefits, for example, the University’s in-house requirements and the Green League table, virtual Swap Shop, which saves the University thousands of pounds a year through which ranks universities’ sustainability not having to buy new furniture and stationery. Also, departmental carbon and water performance each year. In 2013 the University will continue its work to improve reduction initiatives have reduced energy and water bills by thousands of pounds. its environmental performance, by investing Thank you to everyone who contributed to sustainability initiatives last year – we in energy and water efficiency and also by hope you can continue to help us create an even more sustainable University in 2013. providing staff and students with the tools to reduce their environmental impacts.” Professor William James, Chair, Sustainability Steering Group Professor Andrew Hamilton FRS BACK TO University of Oxford Environmental Sustainability Report 2011/12 3 CONTENTS How does the University make decisions about sustainability? IT STARTS HERE BUILDING Reports to & ESTATES Reports to SUB-COMMITTEE The SUSTAINABILITY TEAM is made SUSTAINABILITY up of six officers working specifically ENVIRONMENT STEERING in sustainability-related areas Reports to PANEL GROUP Reports to PLANNING & Reports to RESOURCES COUNCIL ALLOCATION COMMITTEE The University of Oxford Student Union (OUSU) Environment and Ethics Committee also sits on these committees CONTINUED BACK TO University of Oxford Environmental Sustainability Report 2011/12 4 CONTENTS How does the University make decisions about sustainability? continued POLICY AND ENVIRONMENTAL STAKEHOLDER TARGETS SUSTAINABILITY RISK ENGAGEMENT The University Environmental The University has identified several areas The University engages stakeholders Sustainability Policy was approved by of reputational, financial, legislative and in environmental sustainability through the University Council in 2008. See environmental risk. We are developing the work of the Sustainability Team and our Policy here: www.admin.ox.ac.uk/ policies and strategies to minimise risk in the wider University. Sustainability is estates/environment these areas: embedded into the University Strategic Plan 2013-18 and the Estates Strategy Currently the University does not have • Carbon emissions 2013-18. The Environment Panel and an overarching Sustainability Strategy • Greenhouse Gas (non-carbon) the Sustainability Steering Group (SSG) that sets out objectives and targets in all emissions from energy in buildings and bring together cross-departmental policy areas. However, there are strategies from staff and student travel representation from students, academic and targets for carbon, water, travel • Water consumption and non-academic staff and colleges. and waste. In 2013 we will aim to set • Sustainable buildings (construction, SSG is responsible for reviewing our targets for all areas in the Environmental developments, infrastructure and environmental sustainability targets and Sustainability Policy. facilities) objectives. It has the power to influence The Policy is driven through various • Travel (air, ground and water pollution Divisional and Departmental Heads if strategies and committees: from University-related travel) required in order to facilitate delivery of the • Carbon Management Strategy – • Waste (air, ground and water pollution University’s environmental sustainability www.admin.ox.ac.uk/estates/ and financial impacts of waste disposal) objectives. The Pro-Vice Chancellor for environment/energy – approved Planning and Resources is Chair of SSG and • Sustainable purchasing (air, ground and by Council the Head of Environmental Sustainability is water pollution from purchasing goods • Travel Plan – www.admin.ox.ac.uk/ the SSG Secretary. and services) estates/travel – approved by the Building and Estates Sub-Committee • Biodiversity impacts from building, new development and operations • Water Management Strategy – www.admin.ox.ac.uk/estates/ environment/water – approved by PRAC • Waste Management Strategy – www.admin.ox.ac.uk/estates/ environment/waste – approved by PRAC BACK TO University of Oxford Environmental Sustainability Report 2011/12 5 CONTENTS Carbon reduction HOW DID WE DO IN 2011/12? We reduced our carbon emissions Carbon targets – are we on track? Although the University has reduced its DID YOU KNOW? emissions considerably, it needs to cut In 2011/12 the University reduced its In 2011/12 the University reduced its In 2011/12 the University reduced emissions even more, in order to meet our total carbon emissions by 1.2% due to carbon emissions from 78,267 tCO2 its carbon emissions by 918tCO2 investment spent on energy efficiency to77, 349 tCO2 – a decrease of 918 carbon reduction targets: – equivalent to emissions from projects and the comparatively mild tCO2 (1.2%). The reduction was due • to reduce carbon emissions by 11% 131 houses in 1 year (based on winter. The graph below shows how to investment in new energy efficient below the 2005/6 baseline by an average Oxfordshire house much we have decreased our carbon systems and significant efforts by all 2015/16 (a cut of 7,257.8 tCO2) producing 7 tCO2 /year) emissions, and how far we have to go members of the University to use energy • to reduce carbon emissions by 33% to reach our carbon reduction targets. more efficiently. below the 2005/6 baseline by 2020/21 (a cut of 21,773.4 tCO2) 90,000 University carbon emissions in 2011/12: 80,000 Hot water Vehicles 77, 937 76,885 Oil 0.8% 0.5% 70,000 Heat 0.1% 65,980 4.1% 2 60,000 CO 50,000 44,152 Gas Total (t) 40,000 18.7% 2,445.85 30 TONNES OF TONNES 37,609 30,000 University’s emissions from 597 buildings and fleet vehicles 1.72 93.81 20,000 HEFCE 2020 target Electricity 75.8% 10,000 University Preferred Carbon Management Scenario Business as Usual 2020 Projection 05/06 06/07 07/08 08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 600 ACADEMIC YEAR 500 CONTINUED 400 600 300 500 200 400 100 300 0 200 100 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2011/12 0 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2011/12 BACK TO University of Oxford Environmental Sustainability Report 2011/12 6 CONTENTS Carbon reduction continued We produced our own energy • Earth Sciences generated WHAT WILL WE DO IN 2013? 1,016,800kWh of heating and 477,500kWh of cooling from their We’ll continue to invest in We’ll become even more energy We’ll improve energy monitoring Ground Source Heat Pumps renewable energy efficient • Automated metering systems will • New Biochemistry building The University will continue to purchase • We’ll review our Carbon Management cover more electrical and gas meters produced 4275 kWh of renewable off-site renewable energy (hydroelectric Strategy, in liaison with the Carbon Trust • Estates Services will ensure heating electricity through photovoltaic power) from our energy provider. • We’ll roll out the Energy Efficiency system replacements deliver (PV) cells on its roof We’ll review our Carbon Monitoring (EEM) project (expected maximum energy savings Management Strategy savings of 3,756 tCO2 year on year) • Lighting systems and controls will We invested in energy efficiency In 2009/10, Scope 3 emissions made • We’ll roll out the Midnight Oil project in deliver excellent quality and energy The University invested over up 68% of total University carbon medical research buildings (expected efficiency £500,000 in energy efficiency emissions. HEFCE (Higher Education savings of 520 tCO2 year on year) • New buildings and major projects, including replacing boilers Funding Council for England) require us refurbishments will be monitored and replacing energy intensive to report our Scope 3 emissions (from for up to 3 years after they’ve been lighting with LED lighting. procurement, travel, waste and water), commissioned, to ensure they are How much did we pay for our so we’ll review our Carbon Management functioning correctly energy? Strategy to identify how the University In 2011/12 the University energy can integrate Scope 3 emissions bill was £12,029,000.
Recommended publications
  • Old Road Campus

    Old Road Campus

    Old Road Campus 4a, 4b, 4c, U5 n o t Oxford City Centre g OLD ROAD n i d 4a, 4b, 4c, U5 a e H K O L L A D R O W AD E M I L 4,4a,4b,4c, U1X,U5 A41 42 4,4a,4b,4c,U5 Rin D 4 g R oad 6 7 1 13 3 11 C H U R C H I L L 900 D 2 R I 700, 900 V E E O x f o 5 A C rd 12 C i ty 10 C e n t re B 8 CAR PARK C 9 h u r c R F h i O l l O S H E o V s N E p L i T t DRI a VE ENTRANCE ROOSEVELT DRIVE l 900, ST2 Index 1 The Triangle Nursery 9 Old Road Campus Estates Annexe 13 Boundary Brook House Interserve Joint Research Office Kennedy Institute 2 - Research Services, Medical Sciences Division Old Road Campus Research Building 10 - Clinical Trials and Research Governance 3 New Richards Building Department of Oncology - Human Tissue Governance CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology - Medical Sciences Division Business Development 4 NDM Research Building Institute of Biomedical Engineering Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences Target Discovery Institute Jenner Institute Medical Sciences Divisional Safety Officers Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health Bodleian Knowledge Centre (Library Services) Medical Sciences Division IT Services 5 Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics (WHG) Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research Structural Genomics Consortium 6 Henry Wellcome Building for Molecular Physiology Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences Loading Bays and Delivery Offices of the Nuffield Professor of Medicine ENTRANCE VIA BUILDING 5 11 Big Data Institute A Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics 7 Henry Wellcome Building for Particle Imaging
  • Endoscopy Disease Detection Challenge 2020

    Endoscopy Disease Detection Challenge 2020

    ENDOSCOPY DISEASE DETECTION CHALLENGE 2020 Sharib Ali1 Noha Ghatwary7 Barbara Braden2 Dominique Lamarque3 Adam Bailey 2 Stefano Realdon4 Renato Cannizzaro 5 Jens Rittscher1 Christian Daul6 James East 2 1 Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Big Data Institute, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Oxford, UK 2 Translational Gastroenterology Unit, Experimental Medicine Div., John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK 3 Universite´ de Versailles St-Quentin en Yvelines, Hopitalˆ Ambroise Pare,´ France 4 Instituto Onclologico Veneto, IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy 5 CRO Centro Riferimento Oncologico IRCCS Aviano Italy 6 CRAN UMR 7039, University of Lorraine, CNRS, Nancy, France 7 University of Lincoln, UK ABSTRACT improve current medical practices and refine health-care Whilst many technologies are built around endoscopy, there systems worldwide. However, well-annotated, representative is a need to have a comprehensive dataset collected from publicly available datasets for disease detection for assessing multiple centers to address the generalization issues with research reproducibility and facilitating standardized com- most deep learning frameworks. What could be more im- parison of methods is still lacking. Many methods to detect portant than disease detection and localization? Through diseased regions in endoscopy have been proposed however our extensive network of clinical and computational experts, these have been primarily focused on the task of polyp we have collected, curated and annotated gastrointestinal detection in the gastrointestinal tract with demonstration on endoscopy video frames. We have released this dataset and datasets acquired from at most a few data centers and single have launched disease detection and segmentation challenge modality imaging, most commonly white light. Here, we EDD20201 to address the limitations and explore new di- present our multi-class, multi-organ and multi-population rections.
  • Archaeology in Oxford Oxford City Report to the Oxford City and County Archaeological Forum February-June 2021

    Archaeology in Oxford Oxford City Report to the Oxford City and County Archaeological Forum February-June 2021

    Archaeology in Oxford Oxford City report to the Oxford City and County Archaeological Forum February-June 2021 The impact of Covid 19 on archaeological work in the city The Urban Design and Heritage Team has continued to work remotely from home since the February OCCAF update with normal service levels being maintained. National Planning Policy Framework related field work in Oxford Armstrong Road, Littlemore Between January and May further intermittent archaeological excavation was undertaken around the site of Busy Bees Nursery on Armstrong Road by Oxford Archaeology. A number of pits of Early/Middle Iron Age date were recorded, forming part of a domestic settlement. Above: Early Iron Age pits recorded at Armstrong Road. Images courtesy of Oxford Archaeology. Warneford Hospital In February an evaluation trench was excavated by John Moore Heritage Services on land to the south of Warneford Hospital. The trench was required in advance of a hospital extension because of the potential Roman remains in this area, no significant archaeological remains were noted Old Road Campus Plot B1 In February trial trenching was undertaken by Oxford Archaeology prior to the construction of new University buildings at Old Road Campus. The work was required because of the general potential for prehistoric and Roman remains in this location. No significant archaeological deposits were noted. St Peter's College Castle Hill House, In February historic building recording was undertaken at Castle Hill House by Oxford Archaeology. The 19th century house is due to be demolished as part of the redevelopment of the site by St Peter’s College. The location of a documented 18th-19th century tunnel running under Bulwark’s Lane was confirmed (visible as a semi-circular damp patch in Bulwarks Lane) and recorded.
  • COUNCIL Monday 24 June 2013

    COUNCIL Monday 24 June 2013

    COUNCIL Monday 24 June 2013 COUNCILLORS PRESENT: Councillors Sinclair (Lord Mayor), Brett (Deputy Lord Mayor), Abbasi (Sheriff), Altaf-Khan, Armitage, Baxter, Benjamin, Brown, Campbell, Canning, Clack, Clarkson, Cook, Coulter, Curran, Darke, Fooks, Fry, Goddard, Gotch, Haines, Hollick, Humberstone, Kennedy, Khan, Lloyd- Shogbesan, Lygo, McCready, Mills, O'Hara, Pressel, Price, Rowley, Royce, Sanders, Seamons, Simmons, Smith, Tanner, Turner, Van Nooijen, Williams and Wolff. 11. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE Apologies for absence were received from Councillors Jones, Malik, Paule, Rundle and Wilkinson. 12. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST There were no declarations of interest from Councillors present at the meeting. 13. MINUTES (1) The Minutes of the Ordinary meeting of Council held on 22 nd April 2013 were agreed as a correct record and signed by the Lord Mayor. (2) The Minutes of the Annual meeting of Council held on 20 th May 2013 were agreed as a correct record and signed by the Lord Mayor. 14. APPOINTMENTS TO COMMITTEES There were no appointments to committees. 15. ANNOUNCEMENTS (1) Lord Mayor The Lord Mayor made four announcements as follows:- (a) A request to film the proceedings of Council had been received from a member of the public. Councillors discussed the request. Views ranged from noting that the meeting was filmed already and the outcome was placed on the Council’s website, through concern that private filming could result in extracts of that exercise being edited and used out of context to the view that council meetings should generally be fully opened to public scrutiny. The Lord Mayor noted that the request to film has only that day been received and the matter had not been discussed by the political groups.
  • Council Letter Template

    Council Letter Template

    Agenda Item 5 West Area Planning Committee 13th June 2017 Application Number: 17/00250/FUL Decision Due by: 24th May 2017 Proposal: Alterations for the continued use of the buildings as student accommodation comprising: External alterations to elevations and roofs of the existing buildings; tree planting (including containers and supporting structures); alterations to, and landscaping of the courtyards; new cycle stores; alterations to existing lighting; and the formation of pedestrian pathways on the east side of Blocks 5 and 8 and the three gatehouses. Site Address: Castle Mill, Roger Dudman Way (site plan: appendix 1) Ward: Jericho And Osney Ward Agent: Mr Nik Lyzba Applicant: Chancellor, Masters And Scholars Of The University Of Oxford Recommendation: The West Area Planning Committee are recommended to grant planning permission for the following reasons Reasons for Approval 1 It is considered that the proposed design mitigation strategy for the existing buildings will, on balance, provide some mitigation for the harm that has been caused to the significance, in particular to the settings of a number of high value heritage assets. The Environmental Statement has assessed the strategy in respect of the landscape and visual impacts, historic environmental impacts, and impacts on ecology and nature conservation and considers that there will be some beneficial effects from the measures on these matters. Similarly it is not considered to give rise to any impacts with respect to highway matters, land contamination, air quality, and archaeology and any such matters could be addressed by appropriately worded planning conditions. The proposal is considered to be acceptable in terms of the aims and objectives of the National Planning Policy Framework, and relevant policies of the Oxford Core Strategy 2026, Sites and Housing Plan 2011-2026, and Oxford Local Plan 2001-2016 REPORT 13 2 In considering the application, officers have had specific regard to the comments of third parties and statutory bodies in relation to the application.
  • Job Description and Person Specification

    Job Description and Person Specification

    Job description and selection criteria Job title Statistician (for Biomedical Informatics) Division Medical Sciences The George Institute for Global Health / Nuffield Department Department of Population Health New Richards Building, Old Road Campus, Location Headington, Oxford Grade and salary Grade 7: £29,541 - £36,298 Hours Full-time or part-time (at least 50%) Contract type Fixed-term, 18 months Reporting to Dr Kazem Rahimi Vacancy 111004 reference Introduction The University The University of Oxford is a complex and stimulating organisation, which enjoys an international reputation as a world-class centre of excellence in research and teaching. It employs over 10,000 staff and has a student population of over 22,000. Most staff are directly appointed and managed by one of the University’s 130 departments or other units within a highly devolved operational structure - this includes over 6,500 ‘academic-related’ staff (postgraduate research, computing, senior library, and administrative staff) and over 2,700 ‘support’ staff (including clerical, library, technical, and manual staff). There are also over 1,600 academic staff (professors, readers, lecturers), whose appointments are in the main overseen by a combination of broader divisional and local faculty board/departmental structures. Academics are generally all also employed by one of the 38 constituent colleges of the University as well as by the central University itself. Our annual income in 2011/12 was £1,016.1m. Oxford is one of Europe's most innovative and entrepreneurial universities: income from external research contracts exceeds £409m p.a., and more than 80 spin-off companies have been created. For more information please visit www.ox.ac.uk/staff/about_the_university.html The Medical Sciences Division The Medical Sciences Division is an internationally recognized centre of excellence for biomedical and clinical research and teaching, and the largest academic division in the University of Oxford.
  • Graduate Prospectus 2012–13

    Graduate Prospectus 2012–13

    Graduate Prospectus 2012–13 cover - separate file www.ox.ac.uk/graduate inside front cover - separate file Produced by © The University of The photographs used within University of Oxford this prospectus were submitted Do you need this prospectus Oxford 2011 by current graduate students Public Affairs Directorate and recent alumni as part of in another format? Distributed by All rights reserved. No part a photography competition University of Oxford of this publication may be that took place in 2011. All Braille, large print and audio formats Graduate Admissions reproduced, stored in a photographs are credited to are available on request from: and Funding retrieval system, or the photographer where they University Offices, transmitted, in any form appear. Graduate Admissions and Funding Wellington Square, or by any means, Oxford OX1 2JD electronic, mechanical, Cover photograph by Greg Smolonski Tel: +44 (0)1865 270059 photocopying, recording, +44 (0)1865 270059 Photograph by Michael Camilleri, or otherwise, without Email: [email protected] graduate.admissions@ MSc Computer Science prior permission. admin.ox.ac.uk (St Anne’s College) Graduate Prospectus 2012–13 | 3 Welcome to Oxford Our graduate students are vital to the University of Oxford. They form part of the academic research community, and the teaching and training they receive sets them up to join the next generation of leaders and innovators. Graduate study at Oxford is a very special experience. Our graduate students have the opportunity to work with leading academics, and the University has some of the best libraries, laboratories, museums and Rob Judges collections in the world.
  • 4 Vegetation Dynamics on Port Meadow 4.1 History of Port Meadow

    4 Vegetation Dynamics on Port Meadow 4.1 History of Port Meadow

    4 Vegetation dynamics on Port Meadow 4.1 History of Port Meadow Port Meadow (132 ha) and Wolvercote Common (39 ha) (the Meadow) are adjacent commons lying on the River Thames flood-plain within Oxford City boundary (Map 2.5). They have been grazed since at least the Bronze Age and have never been ploughed. Shiplake Ditch forms the boundary between Port Meadow and Wolvercote Common. The common land and Hook Meadow form part of a larger Site of Special Scientific Interest first notified in 1952 and re-notified under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981. The Nature Conservancy Council’s citation (1983) states that the history of ecological interest in the Meadow was taken into account so the SSSI should be extended to the whole of Port Meadow with Wolvercote Common, with the exception of the Wolvercote allotment gardens. The Meadow is also important as a gene bank of species, particularly well adapted to heavy grazing, which have already been fundamental in the development of agricultural leys (McDonald forthcoming). In 2004, Port Meadow was confirmed as a Special Area of Conservation under European Union legislation because of the presence of Apium repens. The whole was registered as a Scheduled Ancient Monument in 1993 because there are the remains of six Bronze Age burials and three Iron Age settlement sites and field systems on the commons (Map 4.1). Both commons are owned or held in Trust by Oxford City Council and Oxfordshire County Council under Section 9 of the Commons Registration Act 1965. Under the same Act, the Freemen of Oxford and the Wolvercote Commoners registered grazing rights for 1,365 horses, 1,890 cattle, 6 donkeys, 48 ducks and 1,192 geese.
  • Oxford Canal Heritage Trail Guide

    Oxford Canal Heritage Trail Guide

    Oxford Canal Heritage Trail Guide A city walk exploring the cultural and industrial heritage of the Oxford Canal Take a walk on a canal in the heart of the City of Oxford and discover a fascinating world outside of its dreaming spires! www.oxfordcanalheritage.org F O R D C X A O N E A L H T H L E I R A I T R A G E T Hythe Bridge 1 On the Heritage Trail The self-guided Oxford Canal Heritage Trail a thriving narrowboat community, canal is a linear walk along the Oxford Canal that locks, under ancient bridges along a green is approximately three miles (five kms) in corridor full of wildlife. On the trail you will total. You can begin either in Pocket Park learn why the canal was, and continues to just inside Hythe Bridge near the centre of be, so important, nationally as well as locally. Oxford City or at Ball’s Bridge in Wolvercote You will also find out why the canal was built, to the north of the city. There is the option who built it, who paid for it, and who pays of walking past Ball’s Bridge up to Duke’s for it now; the uses to which it was first put, Cut to complete the whole Trail although how its usefulness has changed overtime, you will have to return to near Balls Bridge how it could have been lost for ever, and the to get back into Oxford. However, unless the reasons for its revival. weather is poor, take your time and, whilst There is a large scale map of the Heritage you are walking, imagine the bustle of life on Trail at its start in Hythe Bridge Street this 200 year old canal when horses pulled (Ordnance Survey grid reference SU 508 working boats full of coal and other cargoes 064) and near the end of the trail at Ball’s to Oxford.
  • Proinsulin in Prolonged Fast

    Proinsulin in Prolonged Fast

    20190707~20190720 牛津學術醫學課程心得報告-郭俸志 牛津醫學課程內容說明 • 此學術課程由牛津大學聖艾德蒙學院的牛津中華 經濟計畫工作組(OXCEP)所主辦，今年度課程由 牛津大學極富盛名獲得過大英帝國官佐勳章 (OBE)的Prof. Trish Greenhalgh 與聖艾德蒙學院教 務長Prof. Robert Wilkins 共同策劃，課程內容以 精準醫學研究為主軸並整合各領域世界頂尖的牛 津大學專家教授，針對其最新研究主題給予演講 並與學員充分互動討論 課程特色 • 課程細部內容（請見PDF資料） 此課程未來可能的效益(Pros and Cons)？ Pros: -參加此課程不需英文檢定，錄取條件彈性 (主治醫師or講師) -充分感受並融入牛津大學及學院的文化 -提供與牛津專家學者直接面對面討論的機會，對於未來想申請博 士學程或短期進修會是不錯的機會 (OXCEP負責人Dr. Frank本身是 台灣人，很樂意安排學員與牛津教授單獨討論未來合作的機會) -課程結束後會頒發正式文憑(diploma)，並成為聖艾德蒙學院永久 校友 -有機會未來透過聖艾德蒙學院與牛津大學簽訂MOU • 1. Visiting Fellow Programme 客座教授項目 • 2. Visiting Student Programme 訪問學生項目 or 共同指導博士生 • 3. Academic Medicine Course 精準醫學研修項目 • 4. Distinguished Speaker Lecture Programme 牛津大講堂項目 此課程未來可能的效益(Pros and Cons)？ Cons: -課程費用昂貴，每位學員8000英鎊(包含學費和學院食宿 費)，另外國際機票需自理 -全程英文講授(雖然備有中英文翻譯)，並以英文進行提 問及討論，建議仍需有一定英文程度 -課程內容橫跨多個領域，且內容深入專精，學習吸收的 程度受限於每個人對於該領域瞭解的程度 -未來能否實際達成合作，或是否能共同進行相關研究， 仍需各憑本事 COURSE TIMETABLE Arrival at London Heathrow Airport; 07/07 Sunday Transit to Oxford Check in at the William Miller Building Continental Breakfast 08:00-08:20 the William Miller Building Orientation 08:20-08:35 the William Miller Building Welcome Address; Introduction to University of Oxford and Course Outline 09:00-10:30 Prof. Trish Greenhalgh Lecture Room G, Manor Road Building 10:30-11:00 Tea / Coffee Break 08/07 Monday Precision Medicine in Breast Cancer 11:00-12:30 Prof. Adrian Harris Lecture Room G, Manor Road Building Lunch 12:30-13:30 the Wolfson Hall, St Edmund Hall 14:00-15:30 Walking Tour of Oxford 15:30-17:45 Free Time Welcome Dinner 18:00-20:00 Prof. Robert Wilkins & Prof. Trish Greenhalgh the Wolfson Hall, St Edmund Hall Continental Breakfast 08:00-08:30 the William Miller Building Running Large-scale Clinical Trials via Clinical Trials Units 09/07 Tuesday 09:00-10:30 Prof. Chris Butler Lecture Theatre, Oxford Martin School 10:30-11:00 Tea / Coffee Break Circadian Rhythms and Neuroscience 11:00-12:30 Prof.
  • The Binsey Boat: a Post-Medieval Story of the Thames at Port Meadow, Oxford

    The Binsey Boat: a Post-Medieval Story of the Thames at Port Meadow, Oxford

    The Binsey Boat: a post-medieval story of the Thames at Port Meadow, Oxford By BRIAN DLRIIA\I, REBECCA BRISCO~ and COLIN McKEWA.\i SUMMARY ThiJ report de~cnbe.~ a small scale rescue of part oj a boat .mb}I'Ct to ,nltr erOSIOn, with quite unexpecttd tmplicatlOtlS for three areas of enquiry: lhe evolution of the OXfOl·d Thames from commercial waterlllay to l-twlrl! activitles; the challenge of H!constnulmg a po.mbly unique riller craft from sUUllI lIreas of ;l~ mneT htlll; ami rrf/ecllOn.. on Iht gtomorplwlogy oj ant oj t/" 1110,1 clase'-, siudied flood pllllns in Englami. 71" ,lory Jwrt,d m 2003 when cablmg workJ on tht east bank o[ thl' Thamt,~ at Medley exposed a boat eroding from the bank, flotrjLed to Oxford City Cou11cils archaeologist. The boat WlU oJ clench boll (onslnulion am1 .,./\ expo.sed rt"mam.s presmted a risk to bathers, ,~IOt'k and TWl/igatiou. In the context of Port MeadO'w's protuil'd stallu mul till w/.urtain age of the veSJel It U'(u cifar lIwl any ;,westigatLOn would have to be a carefulf.), dt-Hgned ,\0 as not to compromi.se the tJeSJel or its slIrrolllldmg.\. Wilh Iht aul oj Ihe EnglISh Hmtagt Manlwlt Team mu1 .• IIUUllts of II" OUDCE MSr m Lmui.;rap, Archat'ology COUNt', the boat was invt'Jtigated Irt earlyJwU! 200-1 along with a topographical, geophysual "nd t1wironmmtal illITII!) of lhe .surrounding arta. Tht boat was Itnl(lLit'ely titablishtd as a punt-likL tle.utl, approxl1Iwlely 20,6 m.
  • The Jenner Institute Laboratories University of Oxford Old Road Campus Research Building Roosevelt Drive Oxford OX3 7DQ

    The Jenner Institute Laboratories University of Oxford Old Road Campus Research Building Roosevelt Drive Oxford OX3 7DQ

    The Jenner Institute Laboratories University of Oxford Old Road Campus Research Building Roosevelt Drive Oxford OX3 7DQ 1st May 2020 Dear Prof Gilbert, Thank you for the research of critical global importance which you and your team have undertaken into a potential vaccine for the SARS-CoV-2 virus. As patients and the families of people affected by COVID19, health workers, and public health and social justice campaigners, we are now writing this open letter to you with urgent questions about the licence agreement with Astra Zeneca announced yesterday. We believe that there should be no monopolies in the time of a pandemic - and they should never prevent patients getting affordable access to important diagnostics, medicines or vaccines. We kindly ask that you please respond to the following points: 1. Please make the full terms of the licence agreement with Astra Zeneca public, as has been normalised through the global public health standards set by the Medicines Patent Pool. 2. Can you please provide information on the patents related to the ChAdOx technologies, such as PCT application numbers and information about patent applications at national patent offices and the EPO? 3. Can you please confirm what safeguards have been included in the agreement to guarantee access and affordability for the NHS and for the billions across the world whose lives and livelihoods are threatened? 4. Can you assure us that the agreement with Astra Zeneca is a non-exclusive licence and that it will allow other manufacturers to make and supply quality-assured versions of the vaccine? 5. What efforts have been made to ensure non-patent based monopoly protections, such as regulatory exclusivities, are not enforced on this vaccine? 6.