The Dusky Cockroach in the Canadian Maritimes: Establishment, Persistence, and Ecology Jeff C
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in the United States
Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in the United States September 1993 OTA-F-565 NTIS order #PB94-107679 GPO stock #052-003-01347-9 Recommended Citation: U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in the United States, OTA-F-565 (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, September 1993). For Sale by the U.S. Government Printing Office ii Superintendent of Documents, Mail Stop, SSOP. Washington, DC 20402-9328 ISBN O-1 6-042075-X Foreword on-indigenous species (NIS)-----those species found beyond their natural ranges—are part and parcel of the U.S. landscape. Many are highly beneficial. Almost all U.S. crops and domesticated animals, many sport fish and aquiculture species, numerous horticultural plants, and most biologicalN control organisms have origins outside the country. A large number of NIS, however, cause significant economic, environmental, and health damage. These harmful species are the focus of this study. The total number of harmful NIS and their cumulative impacts are creating a growing burden for the country. We cannot completely stop the tide of new harmful introductions. Perfect screening, detection, and control are technically impossible and will remain so for the foreseeable future. Nevertheless, the Federal and State policies designed to protect us from the worst species are not safeguarding our national interests in important areas. These conclusions have a number of policy implications. First, the Nation has no real national policy on harmful introductions; the current system is piecemeal, lacking adequate rigor and comprehensiveness. Second, many Federal and State statutes, regulations, and programs are not keeping pace with new and spreading non-indigenous pests. -
Download 1 File
PROC. ENTOMOL. SOC. WASH. 83(4). 1981. pp. 592-595 THE FOREST COCKROACH, ECTOBIUS SYLVESTRIS (PODA), A EUROPEAN SPECIES NEWLY DISCOVERED IN NORTH AMERICA (DICTYOPTERA: BLATTODEA: ECTOBIIDAE) E. Richard Hoebeke and David A. Nickle (ERH) Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853; (DAN) Systematic Entomology Laboratory, IIBIII, Agric. Res., Sci. and Educ. Admin., USDA, Vc National Museum of Natural History, Wash- ington, D.C. 20560. Abstract. —Ectohius sylvestris (Poda) was collected in 1980 in New York State, the first record of this European species for North America. This is the second European member of the genus Ectohius potentially to become established in North America. Ectohius syh'estris is described briefly, and its dorsal habitus and external male characters are illustrated. Heifer's key to the cockroach species occurring in North America is modified to include E. sylvestris. A European cockroach, Ectohius sylvestris (Poda), was detected in North America in June 1980 with the collection of a single male specimen in a home at Geneva, New York'. One of us (ERH) received this specimen for identification: it did not agree with any of the native North American species, but it did key readily to E. sylvestris in the European literature (Chopard, 1951; Princis, 1965; Harz and Kaltenbach, 1976). This specimen was sent to DAN for confirmation. In this paper, we discuss recognition features, known distribution, biol- ogy, and habits of E. sylvestris. Only one other species of the genus Ec- tohius, E. pallidus (Olivier), has been reported in the United States (Flint, 1951; cited as lividus (Fabricius)). Distinctive characters of E. -
A Dichotomous Key for the Identification of the Cockroach Fauna (Insecta: Blattaria) of Florida
Species Identification - Cockroaches of Florida 1 A Dichotomous Key for the Identification of the Cockroach fauna (Insecta: Blattaria) of Florida Insect Classification Exercise Department of Entomology and Nematology University of Florida, Gainesville 32611 Abstract: Students used available literature and specimens to produce a dichotomous key to species of cockroaches recorded from Florida. This exercise introduced students to techniques used in studying a group of insects, in this case Blattaria, to produce a regional species key. Producing a guide to a group of insects as a class exercise has proven useful both as a teaching tool and as a method to generate information for the public. Key Words: Blattaria, Florida, Blatta, Eurycotis, Periplaneta, Arenivaga, Compsodes, Holocompsa, Myrmecoblatta, Blatella, Cariblatta, Chorisoneura, Euthlastoblatta, Ischnoptera,Latiblatta, Neoblatella, Parcoblatta, Plectoptera, Supella, Symploce,Blaberus, Epilampra, Hemiblabera, Nauphoeta, Panchlora, Phoetalia, Pycnoscelis, Rhyparobia, distributions, systematics, education, teaching, techniques. Identification of cockroaches is limited here to adults. A major source of confusion is the recogni- tion of adults from nymphs (Figs. 1, 2). There are subjective differences, as well as morphological differences. Immature cockroaches are known as nymphs. Nymphs closely resemble adults except nymphs are generally smaller and lack wings and genital openings or copulatory appendages at the tip of their abdomen. Many species, however, have wingless adult females. Nymphs of these may be recognized by their shorter, relatively broad cerci and lack of external genitalia. Male cockroaches possess styli in addition to paired cerci. Styli arise from the subgenital plate and are generally con- spicuous, but may also be reduced in some species. Styli are absent in adult females and nymphs. -
Biodiversity and Population Dynamics of Litter-Dwelling Cockroaches in Belezma National Park (Algeria)
Turkish Journal of Zoology Turk J Zool (2016) 40: 231-240 http://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/zoology/ © TÜBİTAK Research Article doi:10.3906/zoo-1506-37 Biodiversity and population dynamics of litter-dwelling cockroaches in Belezma National Park (Algeria) 1, 2 3 3 4 Imane AZOUI *, Naama FRAH , Waffa HABBACHI , Mohamed Laid OUAKID , Billal NIA 1 Department of Natural and Life Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, University of Hadj Lakhdar, Batna, Algeria 2 Institute of Veterinary and Agronomical Sciences, University of Hadj Lakhdar, Batna, Algeria 3 Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Badji Mokhtar, Annaba, Algeria 4 Department of Agriculture, University of Mohamed Khider, Biskra, Algeria Received: 26.06.2015 Accepted/Published Online: 02.11.2015 Final Version: 05.02.2016 Abstract: This study aims to investigate the diversity, population dynamics, and distribution of forest cockroaches from the litter of three types of Mediterranean forests (Pinus halepensis, Juniperus phoenicea, Quercus ilex) in Belezma National Park (Northeast Algeria). In every type of forest, blattopteran individuals were hand-collected fortnightly from March 2013 to July 2014. Population dynamics were tested by multivariate analysis of variance for forest types and study months. The capture of 1885 individual forest cockroaches allowed the identification of six species (Loboptera angulata, Dziriblatta stenoptera, Phyllodromica subaptera, Phyllodromica zebra, Phyllodromica cincticollis, and Phyllodromica trivittata). In all studied forests, these species produced two generations per year (spring and autumn), in which the number of females was significantly higher than the number of males. However, P. cincticollis established a single generation in the spring with a balanced sex ratio. L. -
Methane Production in Terrestrial Arthropods (Methanogens/Symbiouis/Anaerobic Protsts/Evolution/Atmospheric Methane) JOHANNES H
Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 91, pp. 5441-5445, June 1994 Microbiology Methane production in terrestrial arthropods (methanogens/symbiouis/anaerobic protsts/evolution/atmospheric methane) JOHANNES H. P. HACKSTEIN AND CLAUDIUS K. STUMM Department of Microbiology and Evolutionary Biology, Faculty of Science, Catholic University of Nijmegen, Toernooiveld, NL-6525 ED Nimegen, The Netherlands Communicated by Lynn Margulis, February 1, 1994 (receivedfor review June 22, 1993) ABSTRACT We have screened more than 110 represen- stoppers. For 2-12 hr the arthropods (0.5-50 g fresh weight, tatives of the different taxa of terrsrial arthropods for depending on size and availability of specimens) were incu- methane production in order to obtain additional information bated at room temperature (210C). The detection limit for about the origins of biogenic methane. Methanogenic bacteria methane was in the nmol range, guaranteeing that any occur in the hindguts of nearly all tropical representatives significant methane emission could be detected by gas chro- of millipedes (Diplopoda), cockroaches (Blattaria), termites matography ofgas samples taken at the end ofthe incubation (Isoptera), and scarab beetles (Scarabaeidae), while such meth- period. Under these conditions, all methane-emitting species anogens are absent from 66 other arthropod species investi- produced >100 nmol of methane during the incubation pe- gated. Three types of symbiosis were found: in the first type, riod. All nonproducers failed to produce methane concen- the arthropod's hindgut is colonized by free methanogenic trations higher than the background level (maximum, 10-20 bacteria; in the second type, methanogens are closely associated nmol), even if the incubation time was prolonged and higher with chitinous structures formed by the host's hindgut; the numbers of arthropods were incubated. -
Table of Contents
Reptilewatch JE Level 3 handbook Thank you for your interest in volunteering to be part of this project. Reptilewatch JE is an island-wide effort to record Jersey’s reptiles, with the aim of detecting changes in their conservation status. By taking part, you will also be helping us to improve our knowledge on the distribution and habitat requirements of Jersey’s reptiles and other species. It’s also a good opportunity for you to spend some time in nature too! In this handbook you will find out everything you need to know about carrying out Reptilewatch JE Level 3 surveys. Contents: Level 3 reptile surveys Safety Submitting your results Resources Habitat assessment Identifying supplementary species Level 3 reptile surveys Please note that you must have completed training and be an experienced surveyor to carry out Level 3 surveys. Where to survey You will be allocated a survey site by Natural Environment with landowner permission already arranged. These sites are of high conservation value, and are particularly likely to be those that are known or suspected to contain grass snakes. Sites will be assigned to 1 km m squares to help ensure there is a representative distribution of sites being surveyed across the island and to allow results to be compared against previous years. When to survey Time of year: Jersey’s reptiles can be active between March and October; relying on heat from the sun to regulate their body temperature. There is a greater chance of seeing reptiles in the spring (April to June) and autumn (mid-August to mid-October) when the cooler weather means they have to bask for longer. -
Florida Blattodea (Cockroaches)
Species Identification - Insects of Florida 1 A Literature-based Dichotomous Key for the Identification of the Cockroach fauna (Insecta: Blattodea) of Florida Insect Classification Exercise Department of Entomology and Nematology University of Florida, Gainesville 32611 Abstract: Students used available literature and specimens to produce a dichotomous key to species of cockroaches recorded from Florida. This exercise introduced students to techniques used in studying a group of insects, in this case Blattodea, to produce a regional species key. Producing a guide to a group of insects as a class exercise has proven useful both as a teaching tool and as a method to generate information for the public. Key Words: Blattodea, Florida, Blatta, Eurycotis, Periplaneta, Arenivaga, Compsodes, Holocompsa, Myrmecoblatta, Blattella, Cariblatta, Chorisoneura, Euthlastoblatta, Ischnoptera,Latiblatta, Neoblattella, Parcoblatta, Plectoptera, Supella, Symploce,Blaberus, Epilampra, Hemiblabera, Nauphoeta, Panchlora, Phoetalia, Pycnoscelis, Rhyparobia, distributions, systematics, education, teaching, techniques. Identification of cockroaches is limited here to adults. A major source of confusion is the recogni- tion of adults from nymphs (Figs. 1, 2). There are subjective differences, as well as morphological differences. Immature cockroaches are known as nymphs. Nymphs closely resemble adults except nymphs are generally smaller and lack wings and genital openings or copulatory appendages at the tip of their abdomen. Many species, however, have wingless adult females. Nymphs of these may be recognized by their shorter, relatively broad cerci and lack of external genitalia. Male cockroaches possess styli in addition to paired cerci. Styli arise from the subgenital plate and are generally con- spicuous, but may also be reduced in some species. Styli are absent in adult females and nymphs. -
Phylogeny and Life History Evolution of Blaberoidea (Blattodea)
78 (1): 29 – 67 2020 © Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, 2020. Phylogeny and life history evolution of Blaberoidea (Blattodea) Marie Djernæs *, 1, 2, Zuzana K otyková Varadínov á 3, 4, Michael K otyk 3, Ute Eulitz 5, Kla us-Dieter Klass 5 1 Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom — 2 Natural History Museum Aarhus, Wilhelm Meyers Allé 10, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark; Marie Djernæs * [[email protected]] — 3 Department of Zoology, Faculty of Sci- ence, Charles University, Prague, 12844, Czech Republic; Zuzana Kotyková Varadínová [[email protected]]; Michael Kotyk [[email protected]] — 4 Department of Zoology, National Museum, Prague, 11579, Czech Republic — 5 Senckenberg Natural History Collections Dresden, Königsbrücker Landstrasse 159, 01109 Dresden, Germany; Klaus-Dieter Klass [[email protected]] — * Corresponding author Accepted on February 19, 2020. Published online at www.senckenberg.de/arthropod-systematics on May 26, 2020. Editor in charge: Gavin Svenson Abstract. Blaberoidea, comprised of Ectobiidae and Blaberidae, is the most speciose cockroach clade and exhibits immense variation in life history strategies. We analysed the phylogeny of Blaberoidea using four mitochondrial and three nuclear genes from 99 blaberoid taxa. Blaberoidea (excl. Anaplectidae) and Blaberidae were recovered as monophyletic, but Ectobiidae was not; Attaphilinae is deeply subordinate in Blattellinae and herein abandoned. Our results, together with those from other recent phylogenetic studies, show that the structuring of Blaberoidea in Blaberidae, Pseudophyllodromiidae stat. rev., Ectobiidae stat. rev., Blattellidae stat. rev., and Nyctiboridae stat. rev. (with “ectobiid” subfamilies raised to family rank) represents a sound basis for further development of Blaberoidea systematics. -
Beiträge Zur Bayerischen Entomofaunistik 13: 67–207
Beiträge zur bayerischen Entomofaunistik 13:67–207, Bamberg (2014), ISSN 1430-015X Grundlegende Untersuchungen zur vielfältigen Insektenfauna im Tiergarten Nürnberg unter besonderer Betonung der Hymenoptera Auswertung von Malaisefallenfängen in den Jahren 1989 und 1990 von Klaus von der Dunk & Manfred Kraus Inhaltsverzeichnis 1. Einleitung 68 2. Untersuchungsgebiet 68 3. Methodik 69 3.1. Planung 69 3.2. Malaisefallen (MF) im Tiergarten 1989, mit Gelbschalen (GS) und Handfänge 69 3.3. Beschreibung der Fallenstandorte 70 3.4. Malaisefallen, Gelbschalen und Handfänge 1990 71 4. Darstellung der Untersuchungsergebnisse 71 4.1. Die Tabellen 71 4.2. Umfang der Untersuchungen 73 4.3. Grenzen der Interpretation von Fallenfängen 73 5. Untersuchungsergebnisse 74 5.1. Hymenoptera 74 5.1.1. Hymenoptera – Symphyta (Blattwespen) 74 5.1.1.1. Tabelle Symphyta 74 5.1.1.2. Tabellen Leerungstermine der Malaisefallen und Gelbschalen und Blattwespenanzahl 78 5.1.1.3. Symphyta 79 5.1.2. Hymenoptera – Terebrantia 87 5.1.2.1. Tabelle Terebrantia 87 5.1.2.2. Tabelle Ichneumonidae (det. R. Bauer) mit Ergänzungen 91 5.1.2.3. Terebrantia: Evanoidea bis Chalcididae – Ichneumonidae – Braconidae 100 5.1.2.4. Bauer, R.: Ichneumoniden aus den Fängen in Malaisefallen von Dr. M. Kraus im Tiergarten Nürnberg in den Jahren 1989 und 1990 111 5.1.3. Hymenoptera – Apocrita – Aculeata 117 5.1.3.1. Tabellen: Apidae, Formicidae, Chrysididae, Pompilidae, Vespidae, Sphecidae, Mutillidae, Sapygidae, Tiphiidae 117 5.1.3.2. Apidae, Formicidae, Chrysididae, Pompilidae, Vespidae, Sphecidae, Mutillidae, Sapygidae, Tiphiidae 122 5.1.4. Coleoptera 131 5.1.4.1. Tabelle Coleoptera 131 5.1.4.2. -
The New Genus Planuncus and Its Relatives (Insecta: Blattodea: Ectobiinae) 139-168 71 (3): 139 – 168 20.12.2013
ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Arthropod Systematics and Phylogeny Jahr/Year: 2013 Band/Volume: 71 Autor(en)/Author(s): Bohn Horst, Beccaloni George, Dorow Wolfgang H. O., Pfeifer Manfred Alban Artikel/Article: Another species of European Ectobiinae travelling north – the new genus Planuncus and its relatives (Insecta: Blattodea: Ectobiinae) 139-168 71 (3): 139 – 168 20.12.2013 © Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, 2013. Another species of European Ectobiinae travelling north – the new genus Planuncus and its relatives (Insecta: Blattodea: Ectobiinae) Horst Bohn *, 1, George Beccaloni 2, Wolfgang H.O. Dorow 3 & Manfred Alban Pfeifer 4 1 Zoologische Staatssammlung München, Münchhausenstrasse 21, 81247 München, Germany; Horst Bohn * [[email protected] chen.de] — 2 The Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, UK; George Beccaloni [[email protected]] — 3 Senckenberg For- schungsinstitut und Naturmuseum, Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Wolfgang Dorow [Wolfgang.Dorow@ sen ckenberg.de] — 4 Bahnhofsplatz 5, 67240 Bobenheim-Roxheim, Germany; Manfred Alban Pfeifer [[email protected]] — * Corresponding author Accepted 21.xi.2013. Published online at www.senckenberg.de/arthropod-systematics on 13.xii.2013. Abstract A new genus of Ectobiinae is described, Planuncus with the three new subgenera, Planuncus, Margundatus and Margintorus, containing species formerly belonging to the genera Phyllodromica (second subg.) and Ectobius (other subg.). New combinations: Pl. (Pl.) tingitanus (Bolívar, 1914), Pl. (Pl.) finoti (Chopard, 1943), Pl. (Pl.) vinzi (Maurel, 2012); Pl. (Margundatus) baeticus (Bolívar, 1884), Pl. (Margun- datus) agenjoi (Harz, 1971), Pl. (Margundatus) erythrurus (Bohn, 1992), Pl. (Margundatus) intermedius (Bohn, 1992), Pl. -
The Evolutionary Significance of Rotation of the Oötheca in The
A PSYCHE Vol. 74 June, 1967 No. 2 THE EVOLUTIONARY SIGNIFICANCE OF ROTATION OF THE OOTHECA IN THE BLATTAR I By Louis M. Roth Pioneering Research Division U.S. Army Natick Laboratories, Natick Mass. ? The newly-formed ootheca of all cockroaches projects from the female in a vertical position, with the keel and micropylar ends of the eggs dorsally oriented. All of the Blattoidea (Fig. 1) and some of the Blaberoidea carry the egg case without changing this position. However, in some of the Polyphagidae (Figs. 11-16) and Blattellidae (Figs. 2,3), and all of the Blaberidae, the female rotates the ootheca 90° so that the keel faces laterally at the time it is deposited on a substrate (Polyphagidae, Blattellidae), carried for the entire embryo- genetic period ( Blattella spp.), or retracted into the uterus (all Blaberidae). According to McKittrick (1964), rotation of the ootheca frees the keel from the valve bases which block an anterior movement of the ootheca while it is in a vertical position, and it orients the ootheca so that its height lies in the plane of the cock- roach’s width, thus making it possible to move the egg case anteriorly beyond the valve. It is likely that by the time the ootheca had evolved to the stage where it was retracted internally, the height of the keel had been greatly reduced (e.g., in Blattella spp.) and it would not be necessary to free its keel from the valve bases. The eggs of Blaberidae increase greatly in size in the uterus during embryogenesis (Roth and Willis, 1955a, 1955b). -
Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections
SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS VOLUME 122, NUMBER 12 THE REPRODUCTION OF COCKROACHES (With 12 Plates) BY LOUIS M. ROTH AND EDWIN R. WILLIS Pioneering Research Laboratories U. S. Army Quartermaster Corps Philadelphia, Pa. (Publication 4148) CITY OF WASHINGTON PUBLISHED BY THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION JUNE 9, 1954 SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS VOLUME 122, NUMBER 12 THE REPRODUCTION OF COCKROACHES (With 12 Plates) BY LOUIS M. ROTH AND EDWIN R. WILLIS Pioneering Research Laboratories U. S. Army Quartermaster Corps Philadelphia, Pa. (Publication 4148) CITY OF WASHINGTON PUBLISHED BY THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION JUNE 9, 1954 BALTIMORE, MD., U. 0. A. THE REPRODUCTION OF COCKROACHES 1 By LOUIS M. ROTH and EDWIN R. WILLIS Pioneering Research Laboratories U. S. Army Quartermaster Corps Philadelphia, Pa. (With 12 Plates) INTRODUCTION Cockroaches are important for several reasons. As pests, many are omnivorous, feeding on and defiling our foodstuffs, books, and other possessions. What is perhaps less well known is their relation to the spreading of disease. Several species of cockroaches closely associated with man have been shown to be capable of carrying and transmitting various microorganisms (Cao, 1898; Morrell, 191 1 ; Herms and Nel- a resurgence of inter- son, 191 3 ; and others). Recently there has been est in this subject, and some workers have definitely implicated cock- roaches in outbreaks of gastroenteritis. Antonelli (1930) recovered typhoid bacilli from the feet and bodies of Blatta orientalis Linnaeus which he found in open latrines during two small outbreaks of typhoid fever. Mackerras and Mackerras (1948), studying gastroenteritis in children in a Brisbane hospital, isolated two strains of Salmonella from Periplaneta americana (Lin- naeus) and Nauphoeta cinerea (Olivier) that were caught in the hos- pital wards.