Jallian Wala Bagh Massacre and the Birth of Revolutionary Terrorism in the Indian Freedom Struggle

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Jallian Wala Bagh Massacre and the Birth of Revolutionary Terrorism in the Indian Freedom Struggle International Journal of Management and Humanities (IJMH) ISSN: 2394-0913, Volume-2 Issue-10, April 2017 Jallian Wala Bagh Massacre and the Birth of Revolutionary Terrorism in the Indian Freedom Struggle Shanmathi. R 2. To trace the role of revolutionary terrorism towards Abstract : The Jallianwala Bagh Massacre provoked a violent Indian Nationalism. current of horror and dismay all over the country. The scale of destruction caused by the massacre agitated the people to revolt B. Hypothesis against the British in a more rigid manner. They were prepared in The Jallian Wala Bagh Massacre was instrumental in sphere mind and body to pass through the severest ordeals. The large heading the success of the revolutionary terrorism movement band of revolutionaries of the freedom struggle who chose a life of exile for many years- some for their life far away from their during Independence. mother land- yeoman’s service to the cause of India’s freedom by C. Sources of Study propagating true facts about the nature of British Rule in India to people hitherto kept an ignorance or misled by the false The research entirely depends on Secondary Sources. propaganda of the British and succeeded in evoking the sympathy Secondary Source include books related to Jallianwala Bagh of the British. It is they who set an example before the Indians by Massacre and the Rise of Nationalism. Ample websites and sacrificing their own life. This paper is an attempt to bring out the blogs have also been referred. hardships underwent by the Indians at the time of massacre and how it ignited them to fight for the nation’s freedom. II. JALLIANWALA BAGH MASSACRE AND ITS Index Terms : Violent current of horror, revolutionaries, IMPACTS national movement, Independence. The 1919 Amritsar Massacre, known alternatively as the I. INTRODUCTION Jallianwala Bagh massacre after the Jallianwala Bagh (Garden) in the northern Indian city of Amritsar, was odered The Indian Freedom Struggle is contemporary world by General R.E.H. Dyer. On Sunday April 13, 1919 which history’s much talked about and in fact an inspiring people’s happened to be ‘Baisakhi’, one of Punjab’s largest religious movement for colonialisation and evils of imperialism. As festivals, fifty British Indian Army soldiers, commanded by India surges the path of progress, it is important to keep in Brigadier-General Reginald Dyer, began shooting at an mind of how it emerged as a nation. The freedom movement unarmed gathering of men, women, and children without that stemmed from the autocratic and despotic nature of rule warning. Dyer marched his fifty riflemen to a raised bank and by the Britishers swept the minds of the commoners in India ordered to kneel and fire. Dyer ordered soldiers to reload their who for so long were subjected to heinous torture and rifles several times and they were ordered to shoot to kill. brutalism in the hands of those who arrived in India as traders Official British Raj sources estimated the fatalities at 379, and in 1600’s. with 1,100 wounded. Civil Surgeon Dr. Williams Dee Meddy The freedom movement although led by the Moderate indicated that were 1,526 casualities. However the causality leaders of the Indian National Congress, nonetheless also had number quoted by the Indian National Congress was more than 1,500, with roughly 1,000 killed. many leaders with revolutionary thoughts and ideas inspired th from the history of their ancestors and even of those leaders On April 13 , the holiday of Baisakhi, thousands of from other nations to rise vehemently against oppression. The Hindus, Sikhs and Muslims gathered in the Jallianwala Bagh people were passing through a sense of frustration and (garden) near the Harmandir Sahib in Amritsar. Baisakthi is a pessimism after agitation and demonstration, against the Sikh festival, commemorating the day that Guru Gobind Rowlatt Bills, the Non-cooperation and the Khilafat Singh founded the Khalsa Panth in 1699, and also known as Movement had not borne the desired results. So there was a the ‘Birth of Khalsa’. During this time people celebrate by revival of the revolutionary and the terrorist movement in the congregating in religious and community affairs, and there country, which succeeded the Jallianwala Bagh Massacre. may have been a large number who were unaware of the political meeting. A. Objectives A. Commencement of Violence 1. To analyze the impact of Jallian Wala Bagh Massacre in the rise of Revolutionary Freedom Struggle. An hour after the meeting began as scheduled at 4:30 pm, General Dyer marched a group of sixty-five Gurkha and twenty-five Baluchi soldiers into the Bagh, fifty of whom were armed with rifles. Dyer had also brought two armored Revised Version Manuscript Received on March 20, 2017. cars armed with machine guns, however the vehicles were Shanmathi. R , B.A.LLB (Hons), 2nd Year, Saveetha School of Law, Saveetha University, Chennai, India. E-mail: [email protected] Published By: Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering 8 & Sciences Publication Pvt. Ltd. Jallian Wala Bagh Massacre and the Birth of Revolutionary Terrorism in the Indian Freedom Struggle Stationed outside the main gate as they were unable to enter In a telegram sent to Dyer, British Lieutenant-Governor of the Bagh through the narrow entrance. Punjab, Sir Michael O’Dyer wrote: “Your action is correct. The Jallianwala Bagh was bounded on all the sides by Lieutenant Governor approves.” houses and buildings and had a few narrow entrances, most of O’Dyer requested that martial law be imposed upon which were kept permanently locked. The main entrance was Amritsar and other areas; this was granted by the Viceroy, relatively wider, but was guarded y the troops backed by the Lord Chelmsford, after the massacre. The “crawling order” armoured vehicles. General.O.Dyer ordered troops to begin was posted on August 19 under the auspices of martial law. shooting without warning or any order to disperse, and to Dyer was messaged to appear before the Hunter direct shooting towards the densest sections of the crowd. He Commission, a commission of inquiry into the massacre that continued the shooting approximately 1,650 rounds in all, was ordered to convene by Secretary of State for India, Edwin until ammunition was almost exhausted. Montagu, during late 1919. Dyer said before the commission that he came to know about the meeting at the Jallianwala B. The Uncountable Deaths Bagh at 12:40 hours that day but did not attempt to prevent it. Apart from the many deaths directly from shooting, a He stated that he had gone to the Bagh with the deliberate number of people died in stampedes at the narrow gates or by intention of opening fire if he found a crowd assembled there. jumping into the solitary well on the compound to escape the He stated that he did not make any effort to tend to the shooting. A plaque in the monument at the site, set up after wounded after the shooting: “Certainly not. It was not my job. independence, says that 120 bodies were pulled out of the Hospitals were open and they could have gone there.” well. The wounded could not be moved from where they have The Hunter Commission did not award any penal nor had fallen, as a curfew had been declared- many more died disciplinary action because Dyer’s actions were concluded by during the night. various superiors (later upheld by the Army Council). The number of deaths caused by the shooting is disputed. However, he was finally found guilty of a mistaken notion of While the official figure given by the British inquiry into the duty and relieved of his command. massacre is 379 deaths, the method used by the inquiry has been subject to criticism. Officials were tasked with finding E. Impact of the Massacre who had been killed during July1919, three months after the Mass riots erupted in Punjab and the govermnet had to place massacre, by inviting inhabitants of the city to volunteer five of the districts under martial law. Eventually an enquiry information about those who participated would be identified committee after its Chairman, Lord Hunter, held General as having been present at the meeting, and some of the dead Dyer guilty of a mistaken notion of duty, and he was relieved may not have had close relations in the area. Additionally, a of his command and prematurely retired from the army. The senior civil servant in the Punjab interviewed by the members Indian National Congress held its annual session in December of the committee admitted that the actual figure could be 1919 at Amritsar and called upon the British Government to higher. “take early steps to establish a fully responsible government in India in accordance with the principle of C. Steps Taken by INC self-determination.” Since the official figures were likely flawed considering the The Jallianwala Bagh massacre provoked s violent current size of the crowd (15,000- 20,000), number of rounds shot of horror and dismay all over the country. The scale of and period of shooting, the politically interested Indian destruction caused by the massacre agitated the people to National Congress instituted a separate inquiry of its own, revolt against the British in a more rigid manner. The freedom with conclusions that differed considerably from the movement although led by the Moderate Leaders of the INC, Government’s. The causality number quoted by the INC was nonetheless also had many leaders with revolutionary more than 1,500, with approximately 1,000 killed. Despite the thoughts and ideas inspired from the history of their ancestors Government’s best efforts to suppress information of the and even of those leaders from other nations to rise massacre, news spread elsewhere in India and widespread vehemently against oppression.
Recommended publications
  • The Stage and Inheritance
    1 The Stage and Inheritance he Indian subcontinent is the only subcontinent in the world. That in itself Ttells us that India possesses a unique geography while also being intrinsi- cally linked to the larger continent, Asia. These two impulses, a pull toward engagement as part of a larger whole and a push to be apart due to a unique ge- ography, have influenced India’s history and behavior through the ages and have determined the nature of her engagement with the world. Geography matters because it has consequences for policy, worldviews, and history. The “big geography” of Eurasia, to which the Indian subcontinent is at- tached, divides that landmass into a series of roughly parallel ecological zones, determined largely by latitude, ranging from tropical forest in the south to northern tundra. In between these extremes, are temperate woodlands and grasslands, desert-steppe, forest-steppe, the forest, and more open taiga. The zone of mixed grassland and woodland was the ecological niche for settled ag- riculture to develop in two areas—in southwest Asia, from the Nile valley to the Indus valley, and in southeast Asia including China—where civilizations, states, and empires grew. Of the two, its geography enabled southwest Asia to communicate easily. Throughout history, from the Nile to the Indus and later the Ganga, exchanges, migrations, and change were the rule with civilizations growing and developing in contact with one another even though they were separate geographically.1 The topography of the Indian subcontinent is open on three sides: the west, south, and east and is blocked off to the north by the Himalayan range.
    [Show full text]
  • Sardar Patel's Role in Nagpur Flag Satyagraha
    Sardar Patel’s Role in Nagpur Flag Satyagraha Dr. Archana R. Bansod Assistant Professor & Director I/c (Centre for Studies & Research on Life & Works of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel (CERLIP) Vallabh Vidya Nagar, Anand, Gujarat. Abstract. In March 1923, when the Congress Working Committee was to meet at Jabalpur, the Sardar Patel is one of the most foremost figures in the Municipality passed a resolution similar to the annals of the Indian national movement. Due to his earlier one-to hoist the national flag over the Town versatile personality he made many fold contribution to Hall. It was disallowed by the District Magistrate. the national causes during the struggle for freedom. The Not only did he prohibit the flying of the national great achievement of Vallabhbhai Patel is his successful flag, but also the holding of a public meeting in completion of various satyagraha movements, particularly the Satyagraha at Kheda which made him a front of the Town Hall. This provoked the th popular leader among the people and at Bardoli which launching of an agitation on March 18 . The earned him the coveted title of “Sardar” and him an idol National flag was hoisted by the Congress for subsequent movements and developments in the members of the Jabalpur Municipality. The District Indian National struggle. Magistrate ordered the flag to be pulled down. The police exhibited their overzealousness by trampling Flag Satyagraha was held at Nagput in 1923. It was the the national flag under their feet. The insult to the peaceful civil disobedience that focused on exercising the flag sparked off an agitation.
    [Show full text]
  • A Reassessment of the 1946 Royal Indian Navy Uprising
    0 Title: Meanings of Failed Action: a reassessment of the 1946 Royal Indian Navy uprising Author: Dr Valentina Vitali Affiliation: Professor of Film Studies University of East London, UK Email: [email protected] Word count: 9,785 (including abstract, notes and keywords; 9,479 without abstract and keywords) Illustrations: available on request, mostly black & white, good quality, copyright cleared. Samples attached separately: People’s Age 23 February 1947, anniversary edition India Office file cover One of Attlee’s telegram to Wavell Communication ratings on HMI Signal School 1 Meanings of Failed Action: a reassessment of the 1946 Royal Indian Navy uprising Abstract: The exhibition Meanings of Failed Action: Insurrection 1946 opened in Mumbai on 17 March 2017 and in New Delhi on 8 February 2018. The second part of Vivan Sundaram’s The History Project,1 this new installation was intended to mark seventy years of Indian independence and partition by exploring an often forgotten moment of Indian history: the uprising of the Royal Indian Navy’s ratings in February 1946, when 10,000 naval ratings took charge of 66 ships across the Indian subcontinent in the name of the ‘Quit India’ movement. R.I.A.F. men, Sepoys, Bombay’s industrial workers and the city’s population joined in, marching in solidarity with the ratings irrespective of caste and religious affiliation. But the Congress and the Muslim League condemned the action and consented to British military intervention, which resulted in the deaths of over two hundred people and the ratings’ imprisonment. The event has since been erased from Indian national history, perhaps because, had the insurrection succeeded, India’s struggle for freedom might have taken a different turn.
    [Show full text]
  • Neoliberalism's Children: India's Economy, Wageless Life, And
    ariel: a review of international english literature Vol. 46 No. 3 Pages 137–163 Copyright © 2015 The Johns Hopkins University Press and the University of Calgary Neoliberalism’s Children: India’s Economy, Wageless Life, and Organized Crime in The Moor’s Last Sigh Matthew S. Henry Abstract: As a comment on India after the publication of Midnight’s Children, Salman Rushdie’s 1995 novel The Moor’s Last Sigh offers a broad-based critique of modern India within the con- text of economic policy shifts that followed the country’s inde- pendence from British rule in 1947. The gradual implementation of neoliberal economic policies in the 1980s and 1990s accom- panied India’s emergence as a major player in the global capitalist economy but also led to drastic increases in income inequality, unemployment, and the proliferation of a vast informal sector of exploitable human capital. Rushdie’s novel identifies India’s entre- preneurial and capitalist classes, specifically in Mumbai/Bombay, as complicit in the exacerbation of the class disparity that has led, in many cases, to increased cultural tensions between Hindus and Muslims as well as the growing ubiquity of government cor- ruption and organized crime. The novel offers additional insight into the exploitative logic of Hindu nationalist politics through its parodic depiction of the Shiv Sena party, which derives much of its political clout through its patriarchal, mafia-esque relation- ship with urban slum dwellers. The Moor’s Last Sigh delineates new and complex forms of oppression and exploitation in postcolo- nial India that often occur simultaneously along class and cultural lines.
    [Show full text]
  • Sabretache the OFFICIAL J O U R N a L O F the CALGARY MILITARY HISTORICAL SOCIET Y
    Sabretache THE OFFICIAL J O U R N A L O F THE CALGARY MILITARY HISTORICAL SOCIET Y www.cmhs.ca May2016 The Royal Indian Navy Mutiny of 1946 An anti-colonial attitude swept through India. Indi- ans deeply resented the fact that their army was now being sent to crush the new peoples’ governments in Burma, Indo- nesia and Indo-China, and re-establish French and Dutch colonies. In the last months of 1945, police killed 63 protes- tors in Bombay and Calcutta. These were turbulent times and the young Indian soldier was deeply affected. As BC Dutt, one of the leaders of the RIN mutiny wrote in his memoir, ‘The barrack walls were no longer high enough to contain the tide of nationalism’. In Bombay, HMIS Talwar was the signal-training establishment of the RIN. With 1500 officers and enlisted members on board, it was the second-largest training center in the whole empire. In the informative recollections titled Mutiny of the Innocents and The RIN Strike By a Group of Victimized Ratings, the former mutineers detailed the squalor on board the Talwar and the indifference or racism of the British officers. The Ratings came from widely different regions… belonged to Hindu, Muslim, Christian and Sikh families. The years spent in the navy had made them – the ratings of the RIN – Indians’. Some formed a clandestine group called ‘Azadi Hindi’ and planned to create general disorder and unrest on Talwar. On Navy Day, 1stDec, 1945, they painted ‘Quit India’, ‘Inquilab Zindabad’ and ‘Revolt Now’ all over the establishment and repeated it when Commander-in-Chief General Auchinlek came on a visit.
    [Show full text]
  • FLAG SATYAGRAHA and WOMEN SATYAGRAHI : an ASSESSMENT AUTHOR Dr
    FLAG SATYAGRAHA AND WOMEN SATYAGRAHI : AN ASSESSMENT AUTHOR Dr. Satya Prakash Gupta (Asst. Prof) Political Science Dayanand Danku Paraga Gyan Uday P.G. Mahavidyalaya Murlipur Kanpur Nagar UP E-mail: [email protected] INTRODUCTION Several phases of movements took place in the Indian independence struggle, among them the Gandhian movement has its own district place. From the Non- Cooperation Movement to the Quit India movement, Gandhiji was a constant struggle and his diligent efforts had led to the backless of India’s subordination, Gandhiji started the freedom movement from 1917, which is known as Champaran and Kheda Satyagraha. The Non-cooperation movement started from August First, 1920 which lasted till 1922. On 5 February 1922, due to the Chauri-Chaura scandal, Gandhiji postponed the Non-cooperation Movement on 12 February 1922. This step of Gandhiji not only put a halt to the independence movement, but the movement for the independence of the country also became frustrated and frustrated. Gandhiji move was greatly criticized, Gandhiji devided the Movement into two as the prohibitory program and creative program was approved in the creative policy for the congress Jhanda Satyagraha. This program included the procession and hoisting of flag at every place. On this basis a huge flag Satyagraha program was made in Nagpur under which the country volunteers arrived as Satyagrahis from all over. Police crossed all limits on flag Satyagraha in Nagpur. Volunteers were brutally assaulted. Satyagrahis were brutually assaulted. Satyagrahis were killed a lot, streams of blood flowed from their bodies, but the volunteers remained stubborn did not lose. Nagpur was successful in the flag movement at the time, Congress had appointed Pandit Jawahar Lal Nehru as the head of administration.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to India and South Asia
    Professor Benjamin R. Siegel Lecture, Fall 2018 History Department, Boston University T, Th, 12:30-1:45, CAS B20 [email protected] Office Hours: T: 11:00-12:15 Office: Room 205, 226 Bay State Road Th: 11:00-12:15, 2:00-3:15 & by appt. HI234: Introduction to India and South Asia Course Description It is easy to think of the Indian subcontinent, home of nearly 1.7 billion people, as a region only now moving into the global limelight, propelled by remarkable growth against a backdrop of enduring poverty, and dramatic contestations over civil society. Yet since antiquity, South Asia has been one of the world’s most dynamic crossroads, a place where cultures met and exchanged ideas, goods, and populations. The region was the site of the most prolonged and intensive colonial encounter in the form of Britain’s Indian empire, and Indian individuals and ideas entered into long conversations with counterparts in Europe, the Middle East, East and Southeast Asia, and elsewhere. Since India’s independence and partition into two countries in 1947, the region has struggled to overcome poverty, disease, ethnic strife and political conflict. Its three major countries – India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh – have undertaken three distinct experiments in democracy with three radically divergent outcomes. Those countries’ large, important diaspora populations and others have played important roles in these nation’s development, even as the larger world grows more aware of how important South Asia remains, and will become. 1 HI 234 – Course Essentials This BU Hub course is a survey of South Asian history from antiquity to the present, focusing on the ideas, encounters, and exchanges that have formed this dynamic region.
    [Show full text]
  • Butler Committee
    Butler Committee ● Indian states committee was appointed to investigate & clarify the relationship between the paramount power & the Princes. ● Sir Harcourt Butler was its chairman Civil Disobedience Movement ● It was Gandhi’s movement. ● It was an all India mass movement. ● It was more popular among the peasants & in rural areas. Nature ● Gandhi started Dandi March with only 78 people, from Gandhi’s Sabarmati Ashram on 12 March, 1930, but was joined by thousands by the time he reached Dandi. ● Bose compared it to Napoleon’s march to Paris. ● The entire distance was covered on foot passing through villages, towns. This enabled Gandhi to connect to the masses with his unique pad-yatra. Spread of the Movement ● Bhagalpur: The peasants stopped paying Chowkidari Tax to Zamindars. R Prasad & Abdul Bari emerged as main leaders. ● North West Frontier Province: Khan Abdul Gaffar Khan ● Tamil Nadu: In April 1930, C. Rajagopalachari organised a march from Thiruchirapalli to Vedaranniyam on the Tanjore coast to break the salt law. ● Malabar: K. Kelappan Nair,a Congress leader famed for the Vaikom Satyagraha, organised salt marches. ● Dharasana: On May 21, 1930, Sarojini Naidu, Imam Sahib & Manilal Gandhi took up the unfinished task of leading a raid on the Dharasana Salt Works. ● Webb Miller ● Assam: A powerful agitation led by students was launched against the infamous ‘Cunningham circular’ which forced students & their guardians to furnish assurances of good behaviour. ● Nagaland: Rani Gaidinliu ( member of Heraka religious movement). Nehru gave her the title of Rani when he met her in 1937 Shillong jail. Who of the following organized a march on the Tanjore coast to break the Salt Law in April 1930? A.
    [Show full text]
  • Iasbaba 60 Day Plan 2020 – Day 16 History
    IASbaba 60 Day plan 2020 – Day 16 History Q.1) Consider the following statements about Jallianwala Bagh massacre: 1. Massacre took place when many villagers gathered in the park to peacefully protest the arrest of Satyapal and Saifuddin Kitchlew. 2. Rabindranath Tagore and S Subramenian Iyer renounced their knighthood in protest to massacre. 3. Government of India formed Buttler Committee to investigate the tragedy. Which of the statements given above is/are incorrect? a) 1 and 2 only b) 3 only c) 2 and 3 only d) 1 and 3 only Q.1) Solution (c) The Jallianwala Bagh massacre, also known as the Amritsar massacre, took place on 13 April 1919, when Acting Brigadier-General Reginald Dyer ordered troops of the British Indian Army to fire their rifles into a crowd of unarmed Indian civilians in Jallianwala Bagh, Amritsar, Punjab, killing at least 400 people including men and women. Over 1,000 people were injured. Statement 1 Statement 2 Statement 3 Correct Incorrect Incorrect Massacre took place when Rabindranath Tagore Edwin Montagu, ordered that a many villagers gathered in renounced his knighthood committee of inquiry be formed to the park for the celebration in protest. Gandhi gave up investigate the matter. So, on of Baisakhi day and also the title of Kaiser-i-Hind. S October 14, 1919, the Government peacefully protest the Subramaniam Iyer had of India announced the formation arrest and deportation of renounced Knighthood in of the Disorders Inquiry two national leaders, 1917 on arrest of Annie Committee, which came to be Satyapal and Saifuddin Besant. more widely known as the Hunter Kitchlew.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORY of INDIAN PAINTING Historyofindianflag
    VIDYA BHAWAN BALIKA VIDYAPITH Subject : Fine Art (painting) class : 12th science/com Date : 17/06/20 RADHAKISHOR MONDAL HISTORY OF INDIAN PAINTING History of Indian Flag A number of flags with varying designs were used in the period preceding the Indian Independence Movement by the rulers of different princely states; the idea of a single Indian flag was first raised by the British rulers of India after the rebellion of 1857, which resulted in the establishment of direct imperial rule. The first flag, whose design was based on western heraldic standards, were similar to the flags of other British colonies, including Canada and South Africa; its red field included the Union Jack in the upper-left quadrant and a Star of India capped by the royal crown in the middle of the right half. To address the question of how the star conveyed "Indianness", Queen Victoria created the Knight Commander of the Order of the Star of India to honour services to the empire by her Indian subjects. Subsequently, all the Indian princely states received flags with symbols based on the heraldic criteria of Europe including the right to fly defaced British red ensigns. A proposed flag for India from 1904, as seen in an Anglo- Indian weekly. The dark blue band represented Hindus and Buddhists, the green band represented Muslims, and the light blue band represented Christians. The vertical purple band on the left side contained the stars from the Orion constellation, which represented the provinces and states. The surrounding red border symbolised India being kept united and whole by British rule.
    [Show full text]
  • The Royal Indian Navy Mutiny of 1946 Nationalist Competition and Civil-Military Relations in Postwar India
    The Royal Indian Navy Mutiny of 1946 Nationalist competition and civil-military relations in postwar India 10,800 words including references, notes, and abstract. This work was supported by a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship, under grant number DGE-1110007. The author has no financial or nonfinancial interests to disclose. Acknowledgements: The author would like to thank WM. Roger Louis, Zoltan Barany, and Ami Pedahzur for their detailed input and helpful suggestions, as well as their mentorship and encouragement. Correspondence to: John M. Meyer, Department of Government, University of Texas at Austin, 158 W 21st ST STOP A1800; Austin, Texas 78712-1704; USA. Email: [email protected]. 1 Abstract This article argues for the importance of the Royal Indian Navy mutiny of 1946 in two key aspects of the transition towards Indian independence: civilian control over the Indian military, and a competition for power between Congress and Communists that undermined Indian workers and their student allies. The article begins with an investigation of the mutiny drawing on three sources: a first-person account from a lead mutineer, a Communist history of the mutiny, and the papers published in the Towards Freedom collection. In 1946 a handful of low-ranking sailors sparked a naval mutiny that ultimately involved upwards of 20,000 sailors, and then crashed into the streets of Bombay with revolutionary fervor. The Communists party in Bombay seized upon the mutiny as an opportunity to rally the working class against the British raj, with the hope of ending British rule through revolution rather than negotiation. Yet the mutiny proved less of a harbinger for what was ending, and more of a bellwether for what was to come.
    [Show full text]
  • Moved by Love the Memoirs of Vinoba Bhave
    MOVED BY LOVE THE MEMOIRS OF VINOBA BHAVE (By Kalindi , Translated into English by Marjorie Sykes ) Preface This book is not Vinobaji's autobiography. He himself used to say that if he were to sit down and write, the result would not be 'the story of the self', I but a story of the 'not-self', because he was 'Vinoba the forgetful'. So he neither wrote nor dictated any such story of the not-self. But during the course of his thousands of talks he used to illustrate his topics by examples from experience, and these naturally included some incidents from his own life. This book is simply an attempt to pick out such incidents from different places and string them together. It follows that there are limits to what can be done. This is not a complete life story, only a glimpse of it. There is no attempt to give a full picture of every event, every thought, every step of the way. It brings together only chose incidents and stories which are to be had in Vinoba's own words. Some important events may therefore not be found in it, and in some places it will seem incomplete,, because the principle followed is to use only Vinoba's own account. Nevertheless, in spite of these limitations the glimpses will be found to be complete in themselves. Children are fond of playing with a 'jigsaw puzzle', where a complete picture, painted on a wooden plank, has been cut up into small parts of many shapes and sizes; the aim is to fit them together into their proper places and so re-build the picture.
    [Show full text]