DOCSLIB.ORG

Downloaded from Brill.Com10/06/2021 03:50:00PM Via Free Access 188 Lemerle and Saintes, As Well As Burgundy Were Also Concerned

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Downloaded from Brill.Com10/06/2021 03:50:00PM Via Free Access 188 Lemerle and Saintes, As Well As Burgundy Were Also Concerned chapter 8 Antiquity and Modernity: Sixteenth- to Eighteenth- Century French Architecture Frédérique Lemerle With the exception of Italy, France is only rivalled by Spain for the number of Roman ruins it boasts. In the Middle Ages and the Renaissance, remnants of classical edifices were an integral part of the urban landscape. Many owed their survival to economic considerations, since it was often more profitable to pre- serve or transform than to destroy them. It was thus that city walls, even those which reductions in the urban population had rendered disproportionately large, were conserved; city gates and triumphal arches were often transformed into fortresses; sometimes triumphal arches were incorporated into new city walls or new buildings. Theatres and amphitheatres, generally invaded by houses, were integrated into fortifications or transformed into citadels or bas- tions. Temples were frequently converted into churches (Temple of Augustus and Livia in Vienne, Temple of Diana in Nîmes) and only demolished when they became too small to accommodate growing congregations. Aqueducts were often repaired and extended and sometimes served as toll gates (Pont du Gard). Thermal waters continued to be exploited and baths were rebuilt when they had been destroyed by cataclysms and restored when damaged by either Christians or barbarians; thermal complexes, like those in Paris (hôtel de Cluny), were often divided into lots and taken over by shopkeepers and craftsmen; in the Cimiez neighbourhood of Nice, the western baths became the site of the cathedral and its baptistery. Transformed as they were, these edifices nevertheless continued to provide a rich formal and decorative reper- tory that local artists naturally drew inspiration from. During the Romanesque period, the approach to this repertory was typically piecemeal: rather than seeking global models, the artists of the time tended to single out classical el- ements which furthered their own original aims.1 The obviously intentional citations made by Provencal artists of the period offer a particularly eloquent example, but other regions, including those of Narbonne, Poitiers, Angoulême 1 Crozet R., “Survivances antiques dans le décor roman du Poitou, de l’Angoumois et de la Saintonge”, Bulletin monumental, 114 (1956) 7–33; Lassalle V., L’influence antique dans l’art roman provençal (2nd edition, Paris: 1983). © Frédérique Lemerle, 2019 | doi:10.1163/9789004378216_010 This is an open access chapter distributed under the terms of the prevailing CC-BY-NC-ND License at the time of publication. Frédérique Lemerle - 9789004378216 Downloaded from Brill.com10/06/2021 03:50:00PM via free access 188 Lemerle and Saintes, as well as Burgundy were also concerned. In the 16th century, archaeologia, in the etymological sense of the study of Antiquity, made a con- siderable leap forward in France quite as much as in Italy.2 1 Architecture and Gallo-Roman Antiquities in the 16th Century Henry II’s architects, whose ideas about both modern architecture and the monumental architecture of the classical period were largely informed by the first two tomes of Sebastiano Serlio’s to be published – the Quarto libro (1537) and the Terzo libro (1540) –, accorded little interest to the antiquities of Gaul. No mention of even the most famous amongst them, the size and splen- dour of which were comparable to those of Rome and Verona, is made by ei- ther Jean Bullant (Reigle generalle d’architecture des cinq manières de colonnes, 1564) or Philibert De l’Orme (Premier tome de l’architecture, 1567). Both seem to have been aware of them however. It is almost certain that De l’Orme travelled to the south of France sometimes between 1536 and 1541, either accompanying Francis I to Nîmes at the end of 1536 or following the court to Aigues-Mortes for the meeting between the French king and Charles V in July 1539. In the con- tract for the Château of Lésigny, dated 1543, he specifies that all the stone blocks will be artfully cut, care taken to ensure that the size, masonry, lines and shapes of all the elements on the left side correspond perfectly with those on the right, and all these stone elements will be so perfectly cut, assembled and joined that none of the joints will be un- even, nor appear in any way different than those of the Arena of Nîmes or other similar ancient edifices.3 As a specialist of stereotomy (art of cutting stones), De l’Orme could hardly have failed to appreciate the quality of the stonework of the Arena of Nîmes. In 1549, the four months he spent participating in the siege of Boulogne prob- ably allowed him to also admire the Tour d’Ordre, an ancient Roman light- post, remarkable for its octagonal form. As for the seven or eight hundred 2 Lemerle F., La Renaissance et les antiquités de la Gaule: l’architecture gallo-romaine vue par les architectes, antiquaires et voyageurs des guerres d’Italie à la Fronde (Turnhout: 2005) 17–21, 58–60. 3 Grodecki C. (ed.), Documents du Minutier central des notaires de Paris. Histoire de l’art au XVIe siècle (1540–1600), vol. I (Paris: 1985), n° 116. De l’Orme was also exacting about the fineness of joints in other works (Pérouse de Montclos J.-M., Philibert De l’Orme Architecte du roi,1514– 1570 (Paris: 2000) 111). Frédérique Lemerle - 9789004378216 Downloaded from Brill.com10/06/2021 03:50:00PM via free access Antiquity and Modernity 189 drawings – now lost – that De l’Orme made during his lifetime and which Peiresc acquired from his heirs after his death,4 it is probable that these repre- sented the principal classical monuments of France as well as those of Rome, in particular, those of De l’Orme’s home town, Lyon, and its surroundings, in- cluding the Pyramid of Vienne and the famous mausoleum and triumphal arch of the ruined Roman oppidum of Glanum. Jean Bullant’s treatise, published in 1564 (and, in extended form, in 1568), contains exclusively Roman examples: the Theatre of Marcellus, Arch of Titus, Pantheon, Temple of the Castor and Pollux, and the Temple of Portunus. That Bullant considered this city as the sole source of worthy classical models is also attested by his practice: the avant-corps of the Château of Écouen is directly inspired by the orders of the Temple of Castor and Pollux and the Basilica Aemilia; the entablature of the Château of Chantilly is taken from the Temple of Serapis.5 It is possible that Bullant, unlike De l’Orme, was not familiar with the prestigious ruins of the Provence, but it is difficult to imagine him being entirely unaware of the antiquities of Nîmes, which Poldo d’Albenas’ well-dif- fused Discours historial de l’antique et illustre cité de Nismes (1559–1560) had made generally known. Both Bullant’s and De l’Orme’s persistence in writing of Gallo-Roman an- tiquities as inferior to those of Italy appears in fact to be a perfectly conscious and curiously paradoxical choice. Though these edifices were appreciated and praised by a number of their most brilliant Italian colleagues (Giuliano da Sangallo, Fra Giocondo, Sebastiano Serlio and Andrea Palladio), to say noth- ing of a great many other educated foreigners (diplomats, doctors, students, etc.), these two royal architects, intent on creating a specifically French mode of modern classical architecture, waived their own country’s rich classical heritage in favour of Serlian – in other words Italian – models. References to French ruins are similarly absent from the work of Pierre Lescot. Jacques Androuet du Cerceau is a case apart: he was the only one to make a major contribution in the area of national antiquities and, besides, to have an overall view of Roman antiquity. But as a non-building architect, he could only have influenced his colleagues by way of his engraved or designed series, which can be dated 1545–1549, and where, next to Italian antiquities he reproduced for instance the pyramid at Vienne, the mausoleum at Glanum, the Piliers de 4 See the letter to Aleandro, June 5, 1618 (Correspondance de Peiresc et Aleandro, vol. I, (1616– 1618), ed. and comm. J.-F. Lhote – D. Joyal (Clermont-Ferrand: 1995) 188–189 and note 110. 5 Pauwels Y., “Les antiques romains dans les traités de Philibert De L’Orme et Jean Bullant”, MEFRIM, 106 (1994–2) 531–547. Frédérique Lemerle - 9789004378216 Downloaded from Brill.com10/06/2021 03:50:00PM via free access 190 Lemerle Tutelle in Bordeaux, the Maison Carrée in Nîmes or the arches of Langres.6 For Italian and French architects ancient edifices provided stereotypes to be developed and amplified, as Serlio demonstrates perfectly in the Quarto libro in which he proposes a model derived from the arch of Ancona.7 It is the very same Serlian model that Pierre Lescot, the architect of the Louvre, went back to, for the Fontaine des Innocents in Paris, adapting it naturally to the monument’s function and to its location in the make-up of the city. Other, less famous 16th-century architects also developed an interest in Gallo-Roman antiquities – sometimes through the demolition of ancient edifices. Such was the case with Nicolas Bachelier (1549–1555) who, in 1549, was charged by the king with the destruction of the Château Narbonnais of Toulouse; this essen- tially medieval edifice had been grafted onto a Gallo-Roman fortification, the structure and the materials of which Bachelier was able to study, as well as a magnificent triumphal arch, unearthed at the same time. At once architect, sculpture and scholar, Bachelier’s high degree of cultural knowledge owed something to his chosen place of activity, since Toulouse was at the time one of France’s first intellectual and artistic centres.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Madame De Ludres-Entourage of Pierre Mignard-17Th
    anticSwiss 02/10/2021 04:52:15 http://www.anticswiss.com Madame de Ludres-entourage of Pierre Mignard-17th SOLD ANTIQUE DEALER Period: 17° secolo -1600 Caudroit Troyes Style: Luigi XIV Reggenza +33662098900 Length:104cm Width:79cm Material:olio su tela Price:4800€ DETAILED DESCRIPTION: Madame de Ludres, Chanoinesse de Pousse in Mary Magdalen repentant French School of the 17th century-circle Pierre Mignard (1612-1695) Canvas 79 cm by 63 cm. Important frame of 104 cm by 87 cm Our painting is a revisited version of the painting of Pierre Mignard exposed to Versailles. Our Madame de Ludres is depicted here repentant, she cries and especially unlike the portrait of Mignard her hair completely covers his chest. Also note the absence of the skull in our table. Madame de Ludres, Canoness of Pousse (1647-1726) Marie-Elisabeth (known as Isabelle), Marquise de Ludres, born in 1647 in Ludres in Lorraine, and died in 1726 in Nancy, is a mistress of King Louis XIV, rival of Madame of Montespan. Pierre Mignard (1612-1695) Born in Troyes, Pierre Mignard apprenticed in Bourges, from 1622, to the painter of altar paintings Jean Boucher, then to Paris at Simon Vouet's. These two painters, who had formerly made the trip to Italy, perhaps communicated to Mignard the desire for a trip beyond the mountains, a rule for the artists of the generation of 1590, abandoned by the artists of his generation (Philippe de Champaigne, La Hyre). From his long stay in Italy, mainly in Rome, from 1634-1635 to 1657 (he made a trip to Parma, Modena and Venice in 1654-1655), we know very little about it; if the artist is strongly Romanized, he still befriends the painter and theorist Charles-Alphonse Du Fresnoy, author of De arte grafica.
    [Show full text]
  • European Architecture 1750-1890
    Oxford History of Art European Architecture 1750-1890 Barry Bergdoll O X fO R D UNIVERSITY PRESS OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS Great Clarendon Street, Oxford 0 x2 6 d p Oxford New York Athens Auckland Bangkok Bombay Calcutta Cape Town Dares Salaam Delhi Florence Hong Kong Istanbul Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madras Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Mumbai Nairobi Paris Sao Paulo Singapore Taipei Tokyo Toronto Warsaw and associated companies in Berlin Ibadan Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the U K and in certain other countries © Barry Bergdoll 2000 First published 2000 by Oxford University Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication maybe reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the proper permission in writing o f Oxford University Press. Within the U K, exceptions are allowed in respect of any fair dealing for the purpose of research or private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Design and Patents Act, 1988, or in the case of reprographic reproduction in accordance with the terms of the licences issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside these terms and in other countries should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above. This book is sold subject to the condition that it shall not, byway o f trade or otherwise, be lent, re-sold, hired out or otherwise circulated without the publisher’s prior consent in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published and without a similar condition including this condition being imposed on the subsequent purchaser.
    [Show full text]
  • "Assomption", Tableau Signé/Daté N. MIGNARD INVENTOR PINXIT
    "Assomption", tableau signé/daté N. MIGNARD INVENTOR PINXIT. AN 1633. Chœur de la cathédrale Notre-Dame des Doms, Avignon, Vaucluse. Nicolas Mignard Autoportrait Huile sur toile H : 67 cm ; L : 53 cm Musée Calvet - Avignon L’identité du modèle a pu être établie par comparaison avec un Portrait de Nicolas Mignard par son fils Paul (1641-1691), conservé au musée des Beaux-Arts de Lyon. Nicolas Mignard, dit Mignard d'Avignon, baptisé le 7 février 1606 à l'église Sainte-Madeleine de Troyes en Champagne, mort à Paris le 20 mai 1668, est un peintre baroque et graveur français. Frère de Pierre Mignard dit "Mignard le Romain", et père de Pierre II Mignard, dit "le chevalier Mignard" et de Paul Mignard, il est le fils d'une famille d’artisans : chapelier, passementier et bonnetier. Après des études d'art dans sa ville natale, il se rend à Fontainebleau où le château attire et retient de nombreux peintres distingués, avant de s’installer à Paris, où il aura pour maître Simon Vouet (1590-1649 infos), le peintre le plus important du règne de Louis XIII, revenu de Rome après y être resté 15 ans. Puis c’est à Lyon qu’il s’installe quelques temps avant de rejoindre, vers 1633, Avignon*, où il va passer une grande partie de son existence. * ce choix d’Avignon et de la Provence avait déjà été celui d’artistes peintres troyens, comme Jacques Macadré, venus s’installer à Aix après avoir été jetés sur les routes par la récession économique de la capitale de la Champagne, de 1575 environ à 1626 ("La peinture à Troyes au XVIe siècle", maîtrise de Monique Barbier).
    [Show full text]
  • LE GRAND CONDÉ Le Rival Du Roi-Soleil ?
    4 septembre 2016 _ 2 janvier 2017 LE GRAND CONDÉ Le rival du Roi-Soleil ? Dossier de Presse juin 2016 Commissariat Mathieu Deldicque, conservateur du patrimoine au musée Condé, assisté d’Astrid Grange Prêteurs Exposition organisée avec la participation exceptionnelle du musée de l’Armée. Le musée de l’Armée offre une des collections d’histoire militaire les plus riches au monde avec près de 500 000 pièces, de l’âge du bronze au XXIe siècle. Créé en 1905, il est situé au cœur de l’Hôtel des Invalides à Paris et propose une programmation culturelle ouverte à tous avec expositions, concerts, projections, conférences, événements et spectacles. En 2015, il a accueilli près de 1,4 million de visiteurs, ce qui le classe au 5e rang des musées français les plus fréquentés. Besançon, musée des Beaux-Arts et musée du Temps Chaalis, abbaye royale, musée Jacquemart-André Chambord, Domaine national Corsaint, église Saint-Maurice Dole, musée des Beaux-Arts Londres, Victoria and Albert Museum Modène, Archivio di Stato Paris, Bibliothèque Mazarine Paris, Bibliothèque nationale de France Paris, musée Carnavalet-Histoire de Paris Paris, Mobilier national Paris, musée des Arts décoratifs Paris, musée d’Orsay Paris, musée du Louvre Versailles, musée national des châteaux de Versailles et de Trianon Mécènes de l’exposition Scénographie SOMMAIRE COMMUNIQUÉ DE PRESSE . 4 PARCOURS DE L’exPOSITION . 6 Scénographie Première partie . L’héroïsme et la gloire, malgré tout Deuxième partie . L’intimité et l’apothéose Quelques œuvres phares de l’exposition BIOGRAPHIE DU GRAND CONDÉ . 20 VISUELS DISPONIBLES POUR LA PRESSE . 22 AUTOUR DE L’exPOSITION .
    [Show full text]
  • Ruin Imagery and the Iconography of Regeneration in Eighteenth Century French Art
    RUIN IMAGERY AND THE ICONOGRAPHY OF REGENERATION IN EIGHTEENTH CENTURY FRENCH ART by Stephen Henry Whitney "" Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts 1977 APPROVAL SHEET Title of Thesis: Ruin Imagery and the Iconography of Regeneration in Eighteenth Century French Art Name of Candidate: Stephen Whitney Master of Arts, 1977 Thesis and Abstract Approved: Boctor George Levitine Professor Department of Art Date Approved: ABSTRACT Title of Thesis: Ruin Imagery and the Iconography of Regen­ eration in Eighteenth Century French Art Stephen Henry Whitney, Master of Arts, 1977 Thesis directed by: Doctor George Levitine Professor, Art Department While the extraordinary popularity of ruin imagery in eighteenth century France is well known to art historians, it has remained a largely unstudied, and thus misunderstood, cultural phenomenon. The profusion of ruin pictures and ruinous garden pavilions during the Enlightenment is general- ly interpreted as symptomatic of the emotional febrility and escapist perversity of a society bogged down in decadence. The popularity of ruins as motifs of interior decoration is taken as proof of the reign of rococo frivolity. The present study seeks to bring into focus how eight- eenth century artists, connoisseurs and writers themselves felt about their ruin imagery. This examination is called for because the evidence of documents, literary sources and the art itself overwhelmingly suggests that ruins were consid- ered to be symbolic of nature's regenerative vitality and wholesomeness. To the contemporary viewer, therefore, the experience of a ruin was an antidote to, not a symptom of, social and personal lethargy.
    [Show full text]
  • Molière-Avignon Et Les Mignard
    Georges Forestier Molière l’Avignonnais et ses amis, Mignard d’Avignon et Mignard le Romain Paru dans Cahiers Jean Vilar, n°118, 2015, p. 4-9. Sept cités grecques se sont disputé l’honneur d’avoir donné naissance à Homère. Une bonne vingtaine de villes françaises disposées le long d’un arc descendant de Nantes à Toulouse et remontant de Carcassonne à Dijon, en passant par la vallée du Rhône peuvent se vanter d’avoir accueilli Molière durant les douze années que dura son activité de comédien dans la moitié sud de la France (1646-1658). L’une d’elles, Pézenas, joli bourg endormi doté de peu d’atouts touristiques, a pris les devants en se proclamant dès le XIXe siècle patrie d’adoption de Molière, allant jusqu’à dénicher un vieux fauteuil présenté comme celui dans lequel il se serait assis toutes les fois qu’il allait chez le barbier ; les légendes locales le montrent même observant le monde autour de lui et faisant des lectures de pièces qu’en fait il écrivit quinze ans plus tard. Il est vrai que Molière et sa troupe séjournèrent à deux reprises plusieurs mois à Pézenas où se tinrent deux longues sessions des États généraux du Languedoc au tournant de 1650-1651 et de 1655-1656 et qu’ils passèrent quelques semaines à l’automne 1653 tout à côté, dans le joli petit château de La-Grange-des-Prés du prince de Conti. Il n’en reste pas moins que Pézenas y est allé au culot afin d’attirer l’attention sur elle, et que les deux cités qui pourraient se prétendre à bon droit « patrie d’adoption de Molière » du fait de la régularité avec laquelle sa troupe y séjourna sont Lyon et Avignon, deux villes, il est vrai, qui n’ont pas besoin d’entonner les trompettes de la renommée moliéresque pour exister.
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibition Checklist Woven Gold: Tapestries of Louis Xiv
    EXHIBITION CHECKLIST WOVEN GOLD: TAPESTRIES OF LOUIS XIV At the J. Paul Getty Museum, Getty Center December 15, 2015 – May 1, 2016 In the hierarchy of court art, tapestry was regarded, historically, as the preeminent expression of princely status, erudition, and aesthetic sophistication. Extraordinary resources of time, money, and talent were allocated to the creation of these works meticulously woven by hand with wool, silk, and precious- metal thread, after designs by the most esteemed artists. The Sun King, Louis XIV of France (born 1638; reigned 1643–1715), formed the greatest collection of tapestries in early modern Europe. By the end of his reign, the assemblage was staggering, totaling some 2,650 pieces. Though these royal hangings were subsequently dispersed, the largest, present repository of Louis’s holdings is the Mobilier National of France. With rare loans from this prestigious institution, Woven Gold: Tapestries of Louis XIV explores and celebrates this spectacular accomplishment. This exhibition was organized by the J. Paul Getty Museum in association with the Mobilier National et les Manufactures Nationales des Gobelins, de Beauvais et de la Savonnerie. We gratefully acknowledge the Hearst Foundations, Eric and Nancy Garen, and the Ernest Lieblich Foundation for their generous support. Catalogue numbers refer to Woven Gold: Tapestries of Louis XIV by Charissa Bremer-David, published by The J. Paul Getty Museum numbers refer to the GettyGuide® audio tour Louis XIV as Collector, Heir, Patron By the end of Louis XIV’s reign, the French Crown’s impressive holdings of tapestries had grown by slow accumulation over centuries and by intense phases of opportunistic acquisition and strategic patronage.
    [Show full text]
  • Molière and Perrault on the Sister Arts by Michael Call According to an Early
    The Poet’s Vision and the Painting’s Speech: Molière and Perrault on the Sister Arts by Michael Call According to an early biographer, Nicolas Poussin once stated that the allegorical figure in the background of his self-portrait represented “the love of painting and friendship” (Cropper and Dempsey 182). In this pre-Lessing era of ut pictura poesis when poetry and painting were the axiomatic sister arts, painting certainly counted many friends among the writers, some of them rather unlikely. Of the many literary works produced in the mid- seventeenth century in praise of painting and painters, few, though, are as unexpected as Molière’s 1669 La Gloire du Val-de-Grâce: the playwright’s longest non-theatrical work, the poem represents a striking anomaly in the Molière corpus with regards to subject matter and style. While this uncharacteristic foray into the visual arts and the genre of didactic poetry can be justified as a gesture of friendship—the poem was written in defense of the artist Pierre Mignard, a close acquaintance of the playwright—such a cursory explanation fails to appreciate how the unusual features of Molière’s poem constitute a careful and deliberate response to a rival pair of painters and poets and to the contemporary identity crisis of French painting. The uncertain relationship between La Gloire du Val-de-Grâce and the rest of the Molière corpus—in fact, the poem’s marginalization—is concretely apparent in the anthologizing of Molière’s work. While the La Grange edition of Molière’s complete works, published in 1682, situated the poem in chronological order among the plays, more modern editions, including the Despois and Mesnard edition of 1873-1927 and the 1971 Pléiade edition edited by Georges Couton, relegate the poem to an appendix.1 By comparison, these two editions place 1 It should be noted that the recently-issued Pléiade edition (2010), edited by Georges Forestier and Claude Bourqui, again places the poem in chronological order.
    [Show full text]
  • Apollo and Columbia: Landscape As Power in Washington D.C. and Versailles
    University of Arkansas, Fayetteville ScholarWorks@UARK Landscape Architecture Undergraduate Honors Theses Landscape Architecture 12-2020 Apollo and Columbia: Landscape as Power in Washington D.C. and Versailles. Beau Cameron Burris Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uark.edu/larcuht Part of the Architectural History and Criticism Commons, Landscape Architecture Commons, and the Urban, Community and Regional Planning Commons Citation Burris, B. C. (2020). Apollo and Columbia: Landscape as Power in Washington D.C. and Versailles.. Landscape Architecture Undergraduate Honors Theses Retrieved from https://scholarworks.uark.edu/ larcuht/11 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Landscape Architecture at ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Landscape Architecture Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected]. APOLLO AND COLUMBIA: LANDSCAPE AS POWER IN WASHINGTON DC AND VERSAILLES BEAU BURRIS DR. KIM SEXTON FAY JONES SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE + DESIGN DEPARTMENT OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Burris 1 INTRODUCTION Burris 2 A palace stands on a knoll ten miles outside of Paris. Its limestone facade is brilliant in midday, its gilded roof gleams like fire. Grand boulevards lined with plane trees radiate out in all directions from a court of marble bounded by golden gates. Here, the glory of monarchy seems to spill into the streets. It runs through massive fountains and into a mile-long canal dug by hand. It nourishes thousands of carefully pruned trees which bathe the land in deep, rich green. This place—glittering, pompous, exuberant, extravagant—is the Château de Versailles (fig.
    [Show full text]
  • H-France Review Vol. 11 (September 2011), No. 201 Alexandre Gady, Ed
    H-France Review Volume 11 (2011) Page 1 H-France Review Vol. 11 (September 2011), No. 201 Alexandre Gady, ed., Georges Fessy, et. al., Jules Hardouin-Mansart: 1646-1708. Paris: Maison des sciences de l'homme, 2010, viii + 612 pp. 494 black and white illustrations and color plates, bibliography, index. 96,00 €. ISBN-10 2-7351-1187-3 / ISBN-13 978-2-7351-1187-9. Review by Rochelle Ziskin, University of Missouri-Kansas City. The impeccably produced Jules Hardouin-Mansart: 1646-1708, edited by Alexandre Gady, written by a diverse group of scholars, and accompanied by superb architectural photographs by Georges Fessy, makes a powerful case that Hardouin-Mansart was among the most important, talented and interesting—as well as among the most prolific—designers of the reign of Louis XIV. Hardouin- Mansart has not shared the degree of acclaim enjoyed by his more famous great uncle François Mansart (1598-1666), whose inventiveness, dazzling stereotomy, precision of classical detail and proportion, and alluring facility as a draughtsman have been—and continue to be—especially prized. Nor has his reputation risen to the level of Louis Le Vau (1612-70), his immediate predecessor as Louis XIV’s premier architecte, designer of the “envelope” at Versailles and the prominently situated and urbanistically effective Collège des Quatre-Nations in Paris, as well as the most inventive domestic planner of his time (among whose works are the château at Vaux-le-Vicomte and several hôtels, including the hôtel de Lambert, on the Ile Saint-Louis). Nor have any of Hardouin-Mansart’s works been considered as having matched the innovative brilliance of the east facade of the Louvre, designed by the polymath scientist and classical scholar Claude Perrault (1613-88).
    [Show full text]
  • Samuel FB Morse's "Gallery of The
    A New Look Samuel F. B. Morse’s Gallery of the Louvre Natio Nal Gallery of art July 3, 2011 – July 8, 2012 The exhibition is made possible by the generous support of the Terra Foundation for American Art and is organized in partnership with the National Gallery of Art. Kw No N today primarily as the inventor of the telegraph, Samuel F. B. Morse fiG. 2 Hubert Robert, Project for the (1791 – 1872) began his career as a painter. Born in Charlestown, Massachusetts, he Transformation of the Grande Galerie of the attended Yale University, graduated in 1810, and moved to Boston. There he became Louvre, 1796, Musée du Louvre, Paris. Photo the private pupil and friend of the painter Washington Allston, who introduced him credit, Réunion des to a traditional program of study that encompassed drawing, anatomy, and art theory. Musées Nationaux / Art Resource, NY; photo, With Allston’s encouragement, Morse went to London, where he met Benjamin Jean-Gilles Berizzi West and was accepted as a student at the Royal Academy of Arts. Morse’s first major painting there, The Dying Hercules (1812 – 1813, Yale University Art Gallery), earned high praise. Returning home in 1815, full of optimism and national pride, Morse confronted an artistic climate unfavorably disposed to history painting in the grand manner and was forced to turn to portrait painting for financial support. Throughout the late 1810s and 1820s, he painted portraits of clients in cities and towns along the Atlantic seaboard. His practice as a portraitist and his ambitions to advance a strong national art came together in his first great picture,The House of Representatives (fi G.
    [Show full text]
  • Primary Teachers' Notes, the Marquise De Seignelay and Two Of
    PRIMARY TEACHERS’ NOTES PRIMARY TEACHERS’ NOTES THE MARQUISE DE SEIGNELAY AND TWO OF HER SONS PIERRE MIGNARD Open daily 10am – 6pm Charing Cross / Leicester Square Fridays until 9pm www.nationalgallery.org.uk 1 PRIMARY TEACHERS’ NOTES ‘THE MARQUISE DE SEIGNELAY AND TWO OF HER SONS’ BY PIERRE MIGNARD (1612 – 1695) The picture is 194 x 155 cm. It was painted in oils on canvas in 1691 These notes have been produced by National Gallery Education for teachers using ‘The Marquise de Seignelay and Two of her Sons’ across the primary curriculum. In these notes you will find: information about the painting; information about the artist; suggestions for classroom activities; curriculum links. Open daily 10am – 6pm Charing Cross / Leicester Square Fridays until 9pm www.nationalgallery.org.uk 2 PRIMARY TEACHERS’ NOTES Cross-curricular work produced in schools, based on ‘The Marquise de Seignelay and Two of her Sons’, will be shown in an exhibition at the National Gallery in 2006 as part of the Gallery’s Take One Picture project. An online exhibition will also be shown on the Take One Picture website (www.takeonepicture.org.uk). Schools wishing to have their work considered should contact National Gallery Education in September 2005 to register their interest. Continuing Professional Development courses, entitled Framing the Curriculum, take place throughout the academic year 2004/05. As well as looking at ‘The Marquise de Seignelay and Two of her Sons’ in detail, they focus on general principles of working with images in the classroom. For more details and to book a place on a course please telephone 020 7747 2844.
    [Show full text]