DOCSLIB.ORG

Archives Des Musées Nationaux, Musée Du Louvre (Série LL)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Archives Des Musées Nationaux, Musée Du Louvre (Série LL) Archives des musées nationaux, musée du Louvre (Série LL) répertoire numérique n° 20150337 Hélène BROSSIER, archiviste sous la direction de la mission des archives du ministère de la Culture et de la communication à partir des inventaires rédigés par les agents des Archives des musées nationaux Première édition électronique Archives nationales (France) Pierrefitte-sur-Seine 2014 1 Mention de note éventuelle https://www.siv.archives-nationales.culture.gouv.fr/siv/IR/FRAN_IR_054378 Cet instrument de recherche a été rédigé avec un logiciel de traitement de texte. Ce document est écrit en ilestenfrançais.. Conforme à la norme ISAD(G) et aux règles d'application de la DTD EAD (version 2002) aux Archives nationales, il a reçu le visa du Service interministériel des Archives de France le..... 2 Archives nationales (France) INTRODUCTION Référence 20150337/1-20150337/480 Niveau de description série organique Intitulé Archives des musées nationaux -musée du Louvre (série LL) Date(s) extrême(s) 1821-1992 Nom du producteur • Musée du Louvre, Paris (1793) Importance matérielle et support 374 boites de type cauchard et 92 registres, soit 55, 37 mètres linéaires Localisation physique Archives nationales de Pierrefitte-sur-Seine Conditions d'accès Librement communicable à l'exception des articles 1 à 3, 6 à 17, 36 à 43, 59 à 81, 83 à 86, 87, 96 à 97, 103 à 116, 118 à 123, 127 à 128, 131 à 132, 143 à 147, 149 à 171, 224 à 359, 367, 372 à 373, 377 à 380, 382 à 384, 388 à 397, 399, 437 à 438 communicables sous un délai de 50 ans à partir de la date de clôture des dossiers Conditions d'utilisation Selon règlement de la salle de lecture DESCRIPTION Présentation du contenu Le fonds provient de la direction du musée du Louvre ainsi que des départements des collections. Il retrace l'histoire des départements et des ateliers affiliés à travers leurs documents d'activité (rapports, notes de service) et leur importante correspondance. Il décrit toutes les procédures de gestion des collections : acquisition, restauration, prêt, muséographie, inventaire. Les départements antiques (antiquités égyptiennes, antiquités grecques, étrusques et romaines et orientales) conservent des dossiers de fouilles menées par leurs équipes. Les départements modernes (peintures, sculptures, arts graphiques et objets d'art) produisent des dossiers d'artistes. Type de classement Les documents étaient classés aux Archives des musées nationaux soit par séries et sous-séries dites « anciennes cotes » établies par Gaëtan de Maussion vers 1858 ou par séries et sous-séries dites « nouvelles cotes » instaurées en 1970. L'organisation par séries et sous-séries a été maintenue ainsi que leurs intitulés. La série LL est composée des sous-séries suivantes : 1LL Direction du musée 2LL Département des antiquités orientales 4LL Département des antiquités égyptiennes (cote vacante) 5LL Département des antiquités grecques et romaines (cote vacante) 6LL Département des peintures 3 Archives nationales (France) 7LL Département des arts graphiques 8LL Département des sculptures (cote vacante) 9LL Département des objets d'art 10LL Ateliers 11LL Moulages 12LL Copistes du Louvre *LL Registres des copistes Chaque article fait référence à son ancienne cote. Celle-ci comprend la double lettre de la série et le numéro de la sous- série. La description des articles n'est pas exhaustive, car elle s'attache à décrire à la pièce ou au dossier en fonction de l'intérêt du document. Certains dossiers n'ont donc pas été décrits. Langue des documents • français Institution responsable de l'accès intellectuel Archives nationales HISTORIQUE DU PRODUCTEUR Voir la notice du producteur Musée du Louvre (FRAN_NP_005223) ENTREE ET CONSERVATION Modalités d'entrée Les archives conservées aux Archives des musées nationaux ont fait l'objet d'un versement aux Archives nationales par la mission des Archives du ministère de la Culture et de la communication sous le numéro 15V0190. Historique de la conservation Les documents étaient initialement conservés aux Archives des musées nationaux (AMN) au sein du musée du Louvre depuis 1858. Ce pôle appartient au Service des bibliothèques et de la documentation générale créée en 1999. Il rassemble le témoignage écrit de plus de deux siècles de gestion des musées de l'État. La constitution des fonds est donc étroitement liée à l'histoire de cette administration. Les départements ont peu ou pas versé d'archives aux AMN depuis 1970. Depuis 1993, les AMN ne reçoivent plus d'archives du musée du Louvre, celui-ci étant devenu un établissement public (décret du 22 décembre 1992) Evaluation, tris et éliminations Il n'a été fait aucune élimination Accroissements Non SOURCES ET REFERENCES Sources complémentaires • - Anciennes séries des Archives des musées nationaux relatives aux différents départements du Louvre (Archives nationales) • 20140044 : série A (antiquités grecques et romaines) • 20144775 : série AE (antiquités égyptiennes) • 20144777 : série B (antiquités orientales) • 20144778 : série C/CG/CR (chalcographie, dessins) • 20144779 : série D/DA/DE (département des arts graphiques) 4 Archives nationales (France) • 20144787 : série M (département des objets d'arts) • 20144794 : série T (palais du Louvre) ,et plus spécifiquement sur les copistes 20144794/41-20144794/42 : sous-série T18 (règlements et autorisations) • 20144790 : série P (département des peintures) • 20144793 : série S (département des sculptures) • 20150044 : série Z, pièces relatives à plusieurs départements • - Autres séries des Archives des musées nationaux (Archives nationales) • 20150162 : série DD, inventaires des collections • 20150497 : série O 30 dossiers de personnels • 20150157 : série *1 BB et *3 BB, procès-verbaux des collèges de conservateurs et des Conseils artistiques • 20144658 (sous-série 5EE) Laboratoire de recherche du Louvre • - Bibliothèque centrale des musées nationaux : collection des manuscrits • - Musée du Louvre Autres instruments de recherche • POIZAT Gilles et REY-FREUDENREICH Élisabeth,Les archives des musées nationaux : guide de recherche, dernière mise à jour en 2011. • PREVET Alain, REY-FREUDENREICH Élisabeth et VAILLANT, Séverine (pôle des Archives des musées nationaux, SBADG),État général des fonds des archives des musées nationaux, dernière mise à jour en 2011. • PREVET Alain, REY-FREUDENREICH Élisabeth et VAILLANT, Séverine (pôle des Archives des musées nationaux, SBADG),Répertoires numériques et inventaires sommaires par séries ou sous-séries, dernières mises à jour en 2014. 5 Archives nationales (France) répertoire numérique n° 20150337 20150337/1-20150337/35 Direction des musées 1964-1989 Historique du producteur [Note des AMN] La fonction de directeur du musée du Louvre a été parfois confondue au XIXe siècle avec celle du directeur des musées impériaux, royaux ou nationaux. Elle s'est souvent effacée devant l'autonomie de chaque département. En 1968, cette fonction est rétablie par A. Malraux, plus représentative et coordinatrice que décisionnelle. Depuis 1993, le président-directeur de l'établissement public du musée du Louvre dispose, quant à lui de pouvoirs plus étendus. Directeurs : Mr Quoniam (directeur de 1972 à 1979), Mr Chabaud (directeur de 1979 à 1983), Mr Mullender (directeur de 1983 à 1985). Historique de la conservation Cotation des Archives des musées nationaux : 1LL1-1LL8 20150337/1 Aménagement et distribution des locaux, gestion, direction, surveillance, activités, visites officielles 1965-1991 Rapports d'activité du musée du Louvre (1990-1991) Visite de l'empereur du Japon (1971) Aménagements au Louvre, redistribution des locaux (1968-1971) Correspondance direction du Louvre, Parrot, Verlet, Vergnet Ruiz (1962-1967) Correspondance service de surveillance, intendance (1963-1970) Correspondance huissier de la conservation (1965-1967) Correspondance entre Parrot et Pradel (1967-1968) Organigramme DMF et direction du Louvre 1970 Rapports des chefs de département à la direction du Louvre (1967-1968) Rapport de Jacques Mullender sur la gestion du Louvre sous sa direction de 1983 à 1985 (TI & II) Correspondance conservateurs du département des Objets d'art à la direction du Louvre (1986) Plaquette « Le projet Grand Louvre » (1985) Historique de la conservation Cotation des Archives des musées nationaux : 1LL1 (1) 20150337/2 Projets d'aménagements, grands travaux. Projet de création d'une direction administrative du musée du Louvre 1964-1970 (1) Nouveaux aménagements du Louvre : projets Note de Chatelain sur les grands travaux prévus (1965-1970). Rapports de Chatelain, Parrot, Pradel, Laclotte, Sérullaz (1964-1967) (2) Direction du musée du Louvre : Projet de création d'une direction administrative du musée du Louvre, note sur l'organisation de la DML et sur le personnel en relevant, implantation des bureaux et plans (1964-1968) (3) Travaux, réaménagement du Louvre et par département (salles Daru, Mollien, Grande Galerie, Salon carré, Flore…) : installation sanitaire, plans et photos des travaux, inauguration (16/12/1969), réception 6 Archives nationales (France) du ministre (19/03/1970), inauguration de la Porte Jaujard (29/06/1970), dossier de presse, réactions, rapports d'activité, dépôt à Fontainebleau et à Malmaison de sculptures du Louvre provenant de la galerie Denon (1943-1968) Historique de la conservation Cotation des Archives des musées nationaux : 1LL1 (2) 20150337/3-20150337/20 Dossiers de la direction (1974-1983) 1974-1983 Type de classement Le classement est réalisé par type de dossier et dans chaque type par ordre chronologique. Historique du producteur
Load more

Recommended publications
  • European Architecture 1750-1890
    Oxford History of Art European Architecture 1750-1890 Barry Bergdoll O X fO R D UNIVERSITY PRESS OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS Great Clarendon Street, Oxford 0 x2 6 d p Oxford New York Athens Auckland Bangkok Bombay Calcutta Cape Town Dares Salaam Delhi Florence Hong Kong Istanbul Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madras Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Mumbai Nairobi Paris Sao Paulo Singapore Taipei Tokyo Toronto Warsaw and associated companies in Berlin Ibadan Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the U K and in certain other countries © Barry Bergdoll 2000 First published 2000 by Oxford University Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication maybe reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the proper permission in writing o f Oxford University Press. Within the U K, exceptions are allowed in respect of any fair dealing for the purpose of research or private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Design and Patents Act, 1988, or in the case of reprographic reproduction in accordance with the terms of the licences issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside these terms and in other countries should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above. This book is sold subject to the condition that it shall not, byway o f trade or otherwise, be lent, re-sold, hired out or otherwise circulated without the publisher’s prior consent in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published and without a similar condition including this condition being imposed on the subsequent purchaser.
    [Show full text]
  • Ruin Imagery and the Iconography of Regeneration in Eighteenth Century French Art
    RUIN IMAGERY AND THE ICONOGRAPHY OF REGENERATION IN EIGHTEENTH CENTURY FRENCH ART by Stephen Henry Whitney "" Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts 1977 APPROVAL SHEET Title of Thesis: Ruin Imagery and the Iconography of Regeneration in Eighteenth Century French Art Name of Candidate: Stephen Whitney Master of Arts, 1977 Thesis and Abstract Approved: Boctor George Levitine Professor Department of Art Date Approved: ABSTRACT Title of Thesis: Ruin Imagery and the Iconography of Regen­ eration in Eighteenth Century French Art Stephen Henry Whitney, Master of Arts, 1977 Thesis directed by: Doctor George Levitine Professor, Art Department While the extraordinary popularity of ruin imagery in eighteenth century France is well known to art historians, it has remained a largely unstudied, and thus misunderstood, cultural phenomenon. The profusion of ruin pictures and ruinous garden pavilions during the Enlightenment is general- ly interpreted as symptomatic of the emotional febrility and escapist perversity of a society bogged down in decadence. The popularity of ruins as motifs of interior decoration is taken as proof of the reign of rococo frivolity. The present study seeks to bring into focus how eight- eenth century artists, connoisseurs and writers themselves felt about their ruin imagery. This examination is called for because the evidence of documents, literary sources and the art itself overwhelmingly suggests that ruins were consid- ered to be symbolic of nature's regenerative vitality and wholesomeness. To the contemporary viewer, therefore, the experience of a ruin was an antidote to, not a symptom of, social and personal lethargy.
    [Show full text]
  • H-France Review Vol. 11 (September 2011), No. 201 Alexandre Gady, Ed
    H-France Review Volume 11 (2011) Page 1 H-France Review Vol. 11 (September 2011), No. 201 Alexandre Gady, ed., Georges Fessy, et. al., Jules Hardouin-Mansart: 1646-1708. Paris: Maison des sciences de l'homme, 2010, viii + 612 pp. 494 black and white illustrations and color plates, bibliography, index. 96,00 €. ISBN-10 2-7351-1187-3 / ISBN-13 978-2-7351-1187-9. Review by Rochelle Ziskin, University of Missouri-Kansas City. The impeccably produced Jules Hardouin-Mansart: 1646-1708, edited by Alexandre Gady, written by a diverse group of scholars, and accompanied by superb architectural photographs by Georges Fessy, makes a powerful case that Hardouin-Mansart was among the most important, talented and interesting—as well as among the most prolific—designers of the reign of Louis XIV. Hardouin- Mansart has not shared the degree of acclaim enjoyed by his more famous great uncle François Mansart (1598-1666), whose inventiveness, dazzling stereotomy, precision of classical detail and proportion, and alluring facility as a draughtsman have been—and continue to be—especially prized. Nor has his reputation risen to the level of Louis Le Vau (1612-70), his immediate predecessor as Louis XIV’s premier architecte, designer of the “envelope” at Versailles and the prominently situated and urbanistically effective Collège des Quatre-Nations in Paris, as well as the most inventive domestic planner of his time (among whose works are the château at Vaux-le-Vicomte and several hôtels, including the hôtel de Lambert, on the Ile Saint-Louis). Nor have any of Hardouin-Mansart’s works been considered as having matched the innovative brilliance of the east facade of the Louvre, designed by the polymath scientist and classical scholar Claude Perrault (1613-88).
    [Show full text]
  • Visit of Louis XIV and Colbert to the Académie Des Sciences in The
    Figure 2.1: Visit of Louis XIV and Colbert to the Académie des Sciences in the Jardin du Roi, title page for Claude Perrault, Mémoires pour servir à l’histoire naturelle des animaux, 1671, engraving by Goyton after Sébastien Le Clerc. 24 2. Opening lecture: The Observatory of the Sun King and Classical Astronomy Michael Petzet (Munich, Germany) At the start of an international symposium on observa- card, Adrien Auzout and Gilles Personne de Roberval, tories around 1900, at the turning-point “from classical the physicists Christiaan Huygens and Edme Mariotte, astronomy to modern astrophysics”, it might make sense Claude Perrault, the physician and versatile scientist to look back briefly at the creation of the Paris Observa- concerned also with architectural designs, was also ac- tory, one of the most important classical observatories cepted at the Academy. As early as on 15 January 1667 – a unique testimony to an era dominated by the Sun he had presented to the Academy newly drafted work King Louis XIV. During this era revolutionary innova- programmes on anatomy and botany.5 tions also took place in the field of astronomy. The The title page of his Mémoires pour servir à l’histoire 1 Paris Observatory, a chief work of Claude Perrault, naturelle des animaux of 1671 (fig. 2.1, p. 24)6 shows the architect of the Louvre colonnade, appears in the a visit of Louis XIV and Colbert to the scholars of the background of an illustration of the Optics in Charles Académie des Sciences in the Jardin du Roi. In addition, 2 Perrault’s Cabinet des Beaux-Arts (fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Ordering the Orders
    Ordering the Orders: Claude Perrault's Ordonnance and the Eastern Colonnade of the Louvre Lucia Allais Gian Lorenzo Bernini made his exit from Paris in October 1665. He left behind three imbuih schemes for the eastern fagade of the Louvre, a disappointed King and court, and little hope that the strained relationship between the French Monarchy and the Italian Papacy could be repaired. Bernini's trip to France had been orchestrated in the name of political and architectural expediency; to the double problem of a palace without a proper facjade and a diplomacy without real amicability, Bernini's talents potentially offered a single solution. One of his schemes, despite his departure, was still in the works. As it turned out, Louis XIV's ambivalence about Bernini's propos- als was eventually matched by Colbert's distaste for his grandiloquence—and the extensive demolition required by the Italian's designs was seen by both as an affront to French sovereign power.' Colbert's response to this vexing sequence of events was, ultimately, to relieve Bernini of his obligations and to resume the search for a French solution that had, since January 1664, already yielded several different proposals. In the spring of 1667 he appointed a committee that brought together the premier architecte Francois Le Vau, the premier peintre Charles Le Brun, and the physician Claude Perrault, to propose new designs. By ail accounts, this petit conseil executed its mandate swiftly and without much difficulty; within three months, the scheme for a colonnade with coupled columns had been proposed, authorized, and finalized.
    [Show full text]
  • Accouplement: Vicissitudes of an Architectural Motif in Classical France
    Building Knowledge, Constructing Histories – Wouters, Van de Voorde, Bertels et al. (Eds) © 2018 6ICCH, Brussels, Belgium, ISBN 978-1-138-33235-5 Accouplement: Vicissitudes of an architectural motif in classical France Pedro P. Palazzo University of Brasilia, Brasilia, Brazil ABSTRACT: Coupled columns in French architecture and the reaction to their use from the Renaissance up to the classical rationalism of the early twentieth century hinged on the debates regarding the relation- ship between structural stability and visual delight, over the backdrop of the search for a national classical tradition. This architectural motif was variously put forward under the argument of the load-bearing performance of materials, as a logical derivation of column spacing rules in the classical canon, or even as a reinterpretation of gothic bundled piers. The practical usefulness and moral suitability of iron reinforce- ment in the wide spans entailed by coupled columns accompanied these debates from the seventeenth- century Louvre Colonnade up to Perret’s case for the monumental use of reinforced concrete. Keywords: 17th–20th centuries, France, Colonnade, Iron Reinforcement, Classical Architecture 1 INTRODUCTION tokens of an independent French classicism, remi- niscent of gothic structures, and their appropriate- Accouplement consists in the use of paired columns, ness and performance as structural supports. most notably in the context of a free-standing As structural science progressed, however, the colonnade. It was described by the academician, terms of the discussion shifted from whether cou- Quatremère de Quincy (1755–1849), as a “fault” pled columns were better than isolated ones to the and a first step on the way to vice(1788).
    [Show full text]
  • Page 307 H-France Review Vol. 2 (August 2002), No. 77 Hilary Ballon
    H-France Review Volume 2 (2002) Page 307 H-France Review Vol. 2 (August 2002), No. 77 Hilary Ballon, Louis Le Vau: Mazarin’s College, Colbert’s Revenge. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1999. ix + 236 pp. Architectural drawings, photos, appendices, notes, bibliography, and index. $50.00 U.S. (cl). ISBN 0-691-04895-9. Review by Douglas C. Baxter, Ohio University. Few tourists today visit the Institut de France on the Quai Conti in Paris’s Left Bank. The Institut, housing France’s important academies, including the renowned Académie française, is better known to scholars, but even then only a few visit either the Bibliothèque Mazarine, whose rich collection has the honor of being France’s oldest public library, or the Institut’s own library. The complex, constructed 1662-1667, has had a long history, first as a college, library, and tomb memorial to Cardinal Jules Mazarin, then as a Revolutionary prison, and finally as home for the Institut since 1806. Hilary Ballon, architectural historian at Columbia University and author of an earlier award-winning study of Paris under Henri I, [1] turns her attention to the Institut’s earlier foundation as Mazarin’s Collège des Quatre Nations, designed by the royal architect Louis Le Vau. While Le Vau is recognized as a gifted architect of important buildings in seventeenth century France, he is a comparatively unstudied figure. In addition to the College, he designed Nicolas Fouquet’s Vaux-le-Vicomte, worked on the King and Queen’s pavilions at Vincennes, and developed housing in the Ile Saint-Louis.
    [Show full text]
  • Antiquity and Modernity: Sixteenth- to Eighteenth- Century French Architecture
    chapter 8 Antiquity and Modernity: Sixteenth- to Eighteenth- Century French Architecture Frédérique Lemerle With the exception of Italy, France is only rivalled by Spain for the number of Roman ruins it boasts. In the Middle Ages and the Renaissance, remnants of classical edifices were an integral part of the urban landscape. Many owed their survival to economic considerations, since it was often more profitable to pre- serve or transform than to destroy them. It was thus that city walls, even those which reductions in the urban population had rendered disproportionately large, were conserved; city gates and triumphal arches were often transformed into fortresses; sometimes triumphal arches were incorporated into new city walls or new buildings. Theatres and amphitheatres, generally invaded by houses, were integrated into fortifications or transformed into citadels or bas- tions. Temples were frequently converted into churches (Temple of Augustus and Livia in Vienne, Temple of Diana in Nîmes) and only demolished when they became too small to accommodate growing congregations. Aqueducts were often repaired and extended and sometimes served as toll gates (Pont du Gard). Thermal waters continued to be exploited and baths were rebuilt when they had been destroyed by cataclysms and restored when damaged by either Christians or barbarians; thermal complexes, like those in Paris (hôtel de Cluny), were often divided into lots and taken over by shopkeepers and craftsmen; in the Cimiez neighbourhood of Nice, the western baths became the site of the cathedral and its baptistery. Transformed as they were, these edifices nevertheless continued to provide a rich formal and decorative reper- tory that local artists naturally drew inspiration from.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Tradition
    TDSR 30.1 TRADITIONAL DWELLINGS AND SETTLEMENTS REVIEW International Association for the Study of JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE STUDY OF TRADITIONAL ENVIRONMENTS Traditional Environments Center for Environmental Design Research 390 Wurster Hall Berkeley, CA 94720-1839 THE POLITICS OF TRADITION FALL 2018 BIENNIAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE STUDY OF TRADITIONAL ENVIRONMENTS OCTOBER 4–7, 2018 | COIMBRA, PORTUGAL | SPECIAL ISSUE — CONFERENCE ABSTRACTS issn # 1050 - 2092 TDSR VOLUME XXX NUMBER I FALL 2018 Editor: Nezar AlSayyad Managing Editor: David Moffat Art Director: Annabelle Ison Production Coordinator: Stuart Chan iaste Executive Coordinator: Salma Abdelfattah Editorial Board Members: Cecilia Chu, University of Hong Kong Yasser Elsheshtawy, United Arab Emirates University Mark Gillem, University of Oregon, Eugene Duanfang Lu, University of Sydney María Moreno-Carranco, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana Robert Mugerauer, University of Washington, Seattle Mrinalini Rajagopalan, University of Pittsburgh Mike Robinson, University of Birmingham Ipek Tureli, McGill University Dell Upton, University of California, Los Angeles Marcel Vellinga, Oxford Brookes University Traditional Dwellings and Settlements Review (TDSR) is the official publication of the interna- tional association for the study of traditional environments ( iaste). As a semi- annual refereed journal, TDSR acts as a forum for the exchange of ideas and a means to dis- seminate information and report on research activities. All articles submitted to TDSR are eval- uated through a blind peer-review process. TDSR has been funded by grants from the Graham Foundation, the Getty Publication Program, the National Endowment for the Arts, the Center for Environmental Design Research, the University of California at Berkeley, and many others.
    [Show full text]
  • City Map Paris
    CITY MAP PARIS At a Glance Eiffel Tower, Champs-Élysées, Louvre, Notre-Dame, Montmartre, Latin small arc of the Carrousel du Louvre, runs to the mid arc of the Arc de Quarter, Mecca of fashionable society, multi-cultural metropolis; for Triomphe and ends to the far west at the modern Grande Arche de La many, it is the eternal myth and the unique ambience that make the Défense. capital city of France the most beautiful city in the world. With its population of about 12 million in Greater Paris, it is the political, 3 ARC DE TRIOMPHE cultural and economic centre of the country. Spreading to the right and The 50 m tall landmark designed by Jean François Chalgrin and left of the Seine, and with Montmartre (129 m), the Buttes-Chaumont inspired by Antiquity rises up on the impressive line of vision between (101 m) and the Montagne de Sainte-Geneviève (60 m) towering over the small arc at the Louvre and the Grande Arche de La Défense. After it, the city is extraordinarily attractive. UNESCO has declared the Napoleon commissioned the Arc de Triomphe in 1806 in honour of his magnificent buildings on the banks of the Seine between Pont de victory at the Battle of Austerlitz, it would be another 30 years before Sully and Pont d’Iéna, Notre-Dame, Pont-Neuf, Louvre and Hotel des it was completed. Daily, Apr–Sep 10 am–11 pm, Oct–Mar 10 am– Invalides, and the Île St-Louis as world heritage sites. The parks, the 10.30 pm, Place Charles de Gaulle, www.paris-arc-de-triomphe.fr quiet streets of the older residential areas, the cafés and bistros, the colourful markets, the classic elegance and the madness of the fashion 4 NOTRE DAME studios, restaurants and the endless profusion of culture also contribute This Gothic masterpiece was built between 1163 and 1345 on the to the unique flair of this French metropolis.
    [Show full text]
  • © Centre De Recherche Du Château De Versailles / 2019 BASE
    BASE BIBLIOGRAPHIQUE 1 À 4136 Accès à la base : http://www.chateauversailles-recherche-ressources.fr/jlbweb/jlbWeb?html=accueilarticles Liste des articles scientifiques référencés dans la Base bibliographique du Centre de recherche du château de Versailles au 2 septembre 2019. Ces articles peuvent être accessibles, le cas échéant, soit directement en ligne via un ou plusieurs fichiers (.PDF), soit sur un site extérieur. Certains articles, pour des questions de droits d’auteur, ne sont pas accessibles et nécessitent un accès réservé. En aucun cas, ce présent document ne constitue une bibliographie exhaustive sur la société de Cour. « [Inauguration du musée de Versailles, 10 juin 1837] », La Presse, n°332, 12 juin 1837 « [Inauguration du musée de Versailles, 10 juin 1837] », La Presse, n°333, 13 juin 1837 « 1. Levée du corps de Louis Auguste de Bourbon (1700-1755) ; 2. Ondoiement d’Anonyme d’Orléans (1693-1694) ; 3. Baptême de Louis Armand de Bourbon (1695-1727) », Études bourboniennes, t. 8 et 9, 1999, p. 131 s. « Acte de baptême de Louis, dauphin de France et de Louis de France, duc d’Anjou (Louis XV), le 8 mars 1712 », Études bourboniennes, 1998, p. 58-. « Brindilles : Publicité en vers au temps de Louis XV », Revue d’histoire de la pharmacie, 19e année, n°74, 1931, p. 135-136. « Catalogue des œuvres exposées », in Quand Versailles était meublé d’argent, cat. expo. château de Versailles, 19 novembre 2007-9 mars 2008 ; Versailles-Paris : EPV-RMN, 2007, p. 233-251 ; sous la dir. de Catherine Arminjon. « Catalogue des statues, bustes, bas-reliefs en marbre et en bronze, antiques et modernes décorant la villa Ludovisi à Rome en 1685, proposés au roi Louis XIV ; [suivi de :] Lettre d’Alvarez à Louvois, 2 décembre 1685 », Nouvelles archives de l’art français.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com10/06/2021 03:50:00PM Via Free Access 188 Lemerle and Saintes, As Well As Burgundy Were Also Concerned
    chapter 8 Antiquity and Modernity: Sixteenth- to Eighteenth- Century French Architecture Frédérique Lemerle With the exception of Italy, France is only rivalled by Spain for the number of Roman ruins it boasts. In the Middle Ages and the Renaissance, remnants of classical edifices were an integral part of the urban landscape. Many owed their survival to economic considerations, since it was often more profitable to pre- serve or transform than to destroy them. It was thus that city walls, even those which reductions in the urban population had rendered disproportionately large, were conserved; city gates and triumphal arches were often transformed into fortresses; sometimes triumphal arches were incorporated into new city walls or new buildings. Theatres and amphitheatres, generally invaded by houses, were integrated into fortifications or transformed into citadels or bas- tions. Temples were frequently converted into churches (Temple of Augustus and Livia in Vienne, Temple of Diana in Nîmes) and only demolished when they became too small to accommodate growing congregations. Aqueducts were often repaired and extended and sometimes served as toll gates (Pont du Gard). Thermal waters continued to be exploited and baths were rebuilt when they had been destroyed by cataclysms and restored when damaged by either Christians or barbarians; thermal complexes, like those in Paris (hôtel de Cluny), were often divided into lots and taken over by shopkeepers and craftsmen; in the Cimiez neighbourhood of Nice, the western baths became the site of the cathedral and its baptistery. Transformed as they were, these edifices nevertheless continued to provide a rich formal and decorative reper- tory that local artists naturally drew inspiration from.
    [Show full text]