The Chalice in the Church. I Author(S): C

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Chalice in the Church. I Author(S): C Irish Church Quarterly The Chalice in the Church. I Author(s): C. A. Webster Source: The Irish Church Quarterly, Vol. 4, No. 14 (Apr., 1911), pp. 146-153 Published by: Irish Church Quarterly Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/30067085 . Accessed: 10/06/2014 23:15 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Irish Church Quarterly is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Irish Church Quarterly. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 195.34.78.209 on Tue, 10 Jun 2014 23:15:03 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 146 THE CHALICEIN THE CHURCH. THE CHALICE IN THE CHURCH.-I. MUCH has from time to time been written on the Com- munion Plate of some of the English Dioceses, and the value of such records cannot be over-rated. One has only to mention in this connexion Old Church Plate in the Diocese of Carlisle, edited by R. S. Ferguson, F.S.A., I882, and the more recent and beautiful volume published in 1gog, by Canon Braithwaite, on The Church Plate of Hampshire. Of course, the great antiquity of the many ancient pieces of Church Plate to be found in the sister Church gives an interest to such publications that could never be awakened in the more modern pieces that exist in the Church of Ireland. And yet, although our possessions in Ireland are poor and meagre when compared with those of the richer Church, the writer feels that the subject has never received from Irish Churchmen the attention that it really deserves. As a consequence, the custodians of our Com- munion Plate are not as careful about it as they might be; the marks that tell of age and workmanship have not the same interest for those who are responsible for their pre- servation, and there is a general lack of knowledge as to whence the pieces came and at what date they were manu- factured. This is not the place to speak of the alienation of Church Plate from its sacred use; such alienation has been too common in the past. Neither is it the occasion for point- ing out the duties and responsibilities of our Rural Deans1 in the matter. Suffice it to say that the whole subject calls for consideration on the part of our diocesan authorities. Any historical survey of our subject must start from the institution of the Eucharistic Feast, and the Cup stands out prominently in that scene. Of what material 1 In the Constitutions of Simon de Rochfort, Bishop of Meath, made at the Synod of Newtown A.D. 1216, canon 5 commands the newly instituted archpriests (who now took the place of earlier bishops) to return a faithful accounit to the Bishop in synod " de statu et conditione librorum, vasorum, vestimentorum, et aliorum ornamentorum et supellectilium in ecclesiis infra suos decanatus." Wilkins, Concilia i. 547. For Bishop John Jebb's reference to the office of Rural Dean, see his speech in the House of Lords on the Church of Ireland, Practical Theology, vol. ii., p. 368 f. This content downloaded from 195.34.78.209 on Tue, 10 Jun 2014 23:15:03 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions THE CHALICEIN THE CHURCH. 147 was the Cup of the Upper Chamber? The question leads us into many by-paths; it suggests the further questions: Was the Last Supper the usual Jewish Passover? Was the Cup used by our Blessed Lord one of the cups of the ceremonial of the Paschal Feast ? Was " the cup of bless- the the ing "' third cup-the Kds habberdkhahk-of Paschal celebration? The train of thought here sug- gested would lead us far afield, and it must be sufficient to say that probably the Cup used by Christ was made of glazed pottery or of glass, and differed little, if at all, from one of the ordinary cups used in a Jewish household. It is more probable, too, that at first the Christians used ordinary vessels in their celebration of the Holy Com- munion. The story of the broken chalice,2 which was con- cocted by the accusers of St. Athanasius, would seem to show that chalices of glass were used in the Church of Alexandria. St. Jerome, speaking of Exuperius, Bishop of Toulouse, and praising his frugality, says that he "ministered the body of Christ in a basket of osiers and the blood in a glass cup."3 Even as late as the tenth cen- tury glass vessels continued to be used on the continent. Marthne4 shows how a community of monks in Flanders, founded by St. Winocus, in that century still used chalices of glass. But local circumstances no doubt regulated then as now the material out of which the sacred vessels in any parti- cular church were made; the poverty or otherwise of the community settled in most instances whether their Com- munion vessels were of glass or of one of the precious metals. In some parts wood and horn were used, but there were objections to both materials. Wood was con- demned by the provincial Council of Trebur,5 held in 895 A.D. Pope Leo IV. (847-855) had already 1 Cor. x. 16. 2 Socrates, E. H. i. 27, Athanasius, Orations against the Arians. Edit. W. Bright, 1884, p. xxV. 3 Hieron., Ep. iv. ad Rustic. Monach. Paris, 1643, P. 41. 4 De AAntiq.Eccl. Bit., iv. 78. 5 Can. 18, after stating that Pope Zephyrinus ordered masses to be celebrated with patens of glass, and that his second successor, Urban, caused all sacred vessels to be of silver, proceeds: Statui- mus ut deinceps nullus sacerdos sacrum mysterium corporis et sanguinis Jesu Christi Domini nostri in ligneis vasculis ullo modo conficere presumat, ne, unde placari debet, inde irascatur Deus." Mansi, Conc., xviii. 142. This content downloaded from 195.34.78.209 on Tue, 10 Jun 2014 23:15:03 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 148 THE CHALICEIN THE CHURCH. ordered in his homily De Cura Pastorali that no one should celebrate Mass with a chalice of wood, lead or glass. It was the use of wood that gave rise to the celebrated apophthegm of St. Boniface of Mainz: "Once golden priests used wooden chalices, but now wooden priests use golden chalices."' Horn also was condemned by the Synod of Celclyth or Chelsea (A.D. 787), inasmuch as it had in it an element of blood ;2 whilst by a decree of the Council of Rheims, held A.D. 847, it was laid down that, if not of gold, chalices should be wholly of silver; tin was only allowed where great poverty could be pleaded." That the Church had her sacred vessels of gold and silver at an early period is evident; the natural tendency to have special vessels for sacred usage asserted itself, and such differentiation showed itself by the Christians adopting costly materials for their chalices, as well as by the adorn- ment- and inscriptions which they put on them. Several instances are cited by Bingham" of the sale of Communion vessels in order to redeem captives or help the poor with the money. The case of Ambrose melting down the vessels of the Church of Milan is an outstanding example; Possidius refers to it in his Life of St. Augustine, and tells how the later saint had in like manner caused the sacred vessels to be broken up and melted down that he might be enabled to release some captives and give relief to the poor.6 There is, however, no need to labour this, for it is perfectly plain that from the fourth century, at least, the Communion vessels of the Church were made of gold or silver, wherever local conditions permitted such outlay and men's devotion prompted them to it. But I desire to treat the subject now as it concerns our own Church of Ireland, and with the aid of such scanty records as we possess. It has been thought that the earliest chalices in the Church of Ireland were made of 1 See Bingham, Origines Ecclesiasticae, ed. 1840, book viii., chap. vi., p. 450, note. 2Haddan and Stubbs, Councils and Ecclesiastical Documents, 1871, vol. iii., p. 452. Vetuimus etiam ne de cornu bovis calix aut patina fierct, ad sacrificandum Deo, quia sanguineae sunt. 3 Gratian, Corpus Juris Canonici, dist. i., c. 45. 4Tertullian, De Pud. io: "Praecedant picturae calicum vestrorum . Si forte patrocinabitur pastor, quemn in calicc depingis." 5 Bingham, book v., chap. vi., pp. 93-95. 6 Vita S. Auliustini, 24. This content downloaded from 195.34.78.209 on Tue, 10 Jun 2014 23:15:03 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions THE CHALICE IN THE CHURCH. 149 stone. Miss Margaret Stokes, in her Early Christian Art in Ireland, says: " The rudest, and possibly the oldest, form of chalice of native workmanship in Ireland was of stone. One example, now pre- served in the Museum of the Royal Irish Academy, is as rude and archaic as the primitive cell in the monastery on the Blasket Island from which it was taken.
Recommended publications
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com10/09/2021 07:17:43PM Via Free Access Chapter 1 the Cult of Saint Leonard at Zoutleeuw
    Ruben Suykerbuyk - 9789004433106 Downloaded from Brill.com10/09/2021 07:17:43PM via free access Chapter 1 The Cult of Saint Leonard at Zoutleeuw Saint Leonard’s Altarpiece In July 1476, the churchwardens of Zoutleeuw gathered in a tavern to discuss commissioning an altarpiece dedicated to Saint Leonard. After their meeting, they placed an order in Brussels, and the work was finished in March 1478. The churchwardens again travelled to Brussels to settle the payment, and the retable was shipped to Zoutleeuw via Mechelen.1 The subject and the style, as well as the presence of Brussels quality marks on both the sculpture and the case of the oldest retable preserved in the Zoutleeuw church today (fig. 8), confirm that it is the very same one that was commissioned in 1476.2 Saint Leonard, the Christian hero of the altarpiece, lived in Merovingian France around the year 500. His hagiography identi- fies his parents as courtiers to King Clovis and states that he had been baptized and instructed in Christian faith by Saint Remigius, archbishop of Reims. Leonard quickly won Clovis’ goodwill, and was granted many favors by him. Not only was he allowed to free the pris- oners he visited, he was also offered a bishopric. However, preferring solitude and prayer he refused the honor and instead went to live in a forest near Limoges, where he preached and worked miracles. One of these wonders involved the pregnant queen, who had joined her husband on a hunting party in the woods and was suddenly seized by labor pains. Leonard prayed on her behalf for safe delivery.
    [Show full text]
  • FURTHER THOUGHTS on the SYMBOLIC ORIENTATION of ST HELENA's CHURCH by R.W.E
    Rep. Lundy Field Soc. 45 FURTHER THOUGHTS ON THE SYMBOLIC ORIENTATION OF ST HELENA'S CHURCH By R.W.E. FARRAH 4, Railway Cottages, Long Marton, Appleby, Cumbria CA16 6BY INTRODUCTION The publication of my first paper (Farrah 1992) elicited a prompt response and a productive correspondence from Myrtle Temstrom (Temstrom 1993). This highlighted a number of errors in my original paper which were subsequently corrected and presented (Farrah 1994) together with an apology to Temstrom for assuming that her date for the consecration of the church, given in her book, A Lundy Album, was incorrect (Farrah 1992,82). This publication was in fact the first time the date of the consecration had. been corrected to June 17th. My sources for supposing the 7th June 1897 to be correct were a newspaper cutting of an account of the dedication of the church supplied by Joy Slocombe, Curator of the Ilfracombe Museum and taken from The 1/jracombe Chronicle, Loyd (1925,43), and an article on the 75th Anniversary Service in Vol.9 of the Illustrated Lundy News and Landmark Journal. With these various sources agreeing to 7th June 1897, I had wrongly assumed Temstrom's date to be incorrect. It seems likely, as Temstrom suggests, that the error first occurred in the 1/jracombe Chronicle, 'possibly by typographic ommission of a digit' (Temstrom 1993,56) and was then subsequently duplicated. With so many of the major reference works giving the incorrect date, it is an error which is likely to occur again, as indeed it has in one recently published book (Lamplugh 1993,75).
    [Show full text]
  • St. Ambrose and the Architecture of the Churches of Northern Italy : Ecclesiastical Architecture As a Function of Liturgy
    University of Louisville ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository Electronic Theses and Dissertations 12-2008 St. Ambrose and the architecture of the churches of northern Italy : ecclesiastical architecture as a function of liturgy. Sylvia Crenshaw Schneider 1948- University of Louisville Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/etd Recommended Citation Schneider, Sylvia Crenshaw 1948-, "St. Ambrose and the architecture of the churches of northern Italy : ecclesiastical architecture as a function of liturgy." (2008). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 1275. https://doi.org/10.18297/etd/1275 This Master's Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has retained all other copyrights. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ST. AMBROSE AND THE ARCHITECTURE OF THE CHURCHES OF NORTHERN ITALY: ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE AS A FUNCTION OF LITURGY By Sylvia Crenshaw Schneider B.A., University of Missouri, 1970 A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Louisville in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Department of Art History University of Louisville Louisville, Kentucky December 2008 Copyright 2008 by Sylvia A. Schneider All rights reserved ST. AMBROSE AND THE ARCHITECTURE OF THE CHURCHES OF NORTHERN ITALY: ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE AS A FUNCTION OF LITURGY By Sylvia Crenshaw Schneider B. A., University of Missouri, 1970 A Thesis Approved on November 22, 2008 By the following Thesis Committee: ____________________________________________ Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Alignment and Location of Medieval Rural Churches
    ASPECTS OF THE ALIGNMENT AND LOCATION OF MEDIEVAL RURAL CHURCHES by Ian David Hinton being a Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the School of History, University of East Anglia August 2010 © This copy of the thesis has been supplied on the condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognize that its copyright rests with the author and that no quotation from the thesis, nor any information derived therefrom, may be published without the author’s prior, written consent St Mary’s and St Lawrence’s, South Walsham, Norfolk - two churches in the same churchyard, but aligned 10° differently ABSTRACT This thesis explores the alignment of medieval rural churches and discusses whether their differing alignments have any specific meaning. It also examines the location of rural church sites and the chronology of church creation in relation to the process of settlement nucleation, the topography of church sites and their possible reuse. A survey of almost 2000 rural medieval churches provides the basis for this study. Part I provides a broad context for the detailed consideration of the results of the survey and their significance. It summarises earlier church alignment studies and the issues that they raise; the practice of alignment more generally; studies of the rural church and its place in the landscape; and earlier studies of medieval rural settlement. Part II describes the survey methodology and its basic results, applies the results to the theories advanced in earlier studies and evaluates them in the light of this new evidence. Part III discusses and analyses two significant variations which have been uncovered: the clear pattern of spatial variation in church alignment between the east and the west of the country, and the fact that between two and three times as many churches were built on east-facing slopes as on west-facing slopes.
    [Show full text]
  • MATIONS, Coj'ît.Jnica Tod to Council and Jabbers Cf Tho League, N/2 0109
    LEAGUE 0? MATIONS, COj'ît.jnica tod to Council and_ 0.388.H,176.1923.1. jabbers cf tho league, Geneva, June 4th, 1923, n/2 0109/ 2 fi 709 1/28621/26709 EüNGAHIAN-SPEAKING GRESi: OATOOLIG MINORITES IN RCUMAFIA. Note by the Secretary-Generals In accordance with the Council1a Resolution of June 27tli, 1921, tho Secretary-General forwarded to the Rouir.auian Government on March 17 th, 1923, for- its oh nervations, a cony of a petition dated January 31st, 1923, from the Greek- Catholic Hungarians’ General Committee, with regard to the situation of Hungarian-speaking Greek Catholics in Roumania, «l>his petition had been forwarded to the Secretariat hy the Hungarian Society of Foreign Affairs, At the request of the Roumanian Government, the President of the Council extended for one month the period of two months fixed in the Resolution of June 27th,1921, within which observations on this petition might be submitted. The Secretary-General has received a note, dated May 25th, 1025, from the Roumanian Minister for foreign Affaire^ for-war ding a Memorandum containing-the Roumanian Government1s observations on the petition„ The Secret ary-General has the honour to communicate herewith these documents for the information of tho Members of the Council and of the league, -1- I, PETITION TïïB G T ^ K CATHOLIC HUNGARIANS' ÇL±COîÏÏjTTTEE^ Budapest, 31st January, 1923» Sir, The Greek Catholic Hungarians General Co u t itt.ee/.Budapest VII. Hottonbiller utoa 5/3./ through the medium of the Hungarian Society of Foreign Affairs which is a member of the Union of the League of Nations presents the following request which it believes to belong to the jurisdiction of the League of Nations: Acting upon the repeated request of the Greek Catholic Hungarians, the Holy See founded on June the dth, 1912 the Greek Catholic Bishopric and Diocese of H&^dudorog.
    [Show full text]
  • The Orientation of Pre-Romanesque Churches in the Iberian Peninsula
    Nexus Netw J (2015) 17:353–377 DOI 10.1007/s00004-014-0231-7 RESEARCH The Orientation of Pre-Romanesque Churches in the Iberian Peninsula Antonio Ce´sar Gonza´lez-Garcı´a • Juan Antonio Belmonte Published online: 8 January 2015 Ó Kim Williams Books, Turin 2014 Abstract The orientation of Christian churches is a distinctive feature of its architecture, repeating patterns from early Christian times that show a general tendency to orientate their apses in the solar range, with a predilection for orien- tations near the astronomical equinox. We measured the orientation of a total of 167 churches built prior to A.D. 1086. A comprehensive statistical analysis of the sample indicates a decisive orientation pattern, with a clear tendency to orientate according to the standard tradition, albeit with certain particularities. Three sub- samples are examined to find the tendencies at each different historical time. This exercise indicates that the main group of orientations seem to relate to the Canonical equinox on 25 March, while popular ‘expected’ orientations, such as that of the rising sun on the day of the patron saint of the church, are completely absent. Other groups of orientations are specific to each period, such as that towards sunrise on Saint James’s day, important only after the discovery of the saint’s tomb in the ninth century. Keywords Pre-Romanesque architecture Á Church orientation Á Christian religion Á Iberian Peninsula Á Archaeostronomy Á Julian calendar Á Gregorian calendar Á Mozarabic architecture A. C. Gonza´lez-Garcı´a(&) Instituto de Ciencias del Patrimonio Incipit CSIC, Santiago de Compostela, Spain e-mail: [email protected] J.
    [Show full text]
  • Mukacˇevo, Church of the Rusyn People
    Journal of Eastern Christian Studies 67(3-4), 243-270. doi: 10.2143/JECS.67.3.3149534 © 2015 by Journal of Eastern Christian Studies. All rights reserved. MUKACˇEVO, CHURCH OF THE RUSYN PEOPLE CONSTANTIN SIMON The city of Mukačevo (Rusyn: Mukačevo, Hungarian: Munkács, Ukrainian: Mukačeve or Mukačiv), from which the diocese draws its own name, is now a small town on the Latorica (Hungarian: Latorca) river, located in the Transcarpathian region of today’s Ukraine. Separated from the rest of the Ukrainian republic by the Carpathian mountains, it faces Hungary, to which it belonged for most of its long history. Today, Mukačevo is overshadowed in importance by the younger city of Užhorod,1 the regional capital just on the Slovak border, and also the residence of the Greek Catholic bishop. A VISIT TO MUKACˇEVO About fifteen years ago, when I last visited the cathedral of the Holy Cross in Užhorod, it had been newly appropriated by the Greek Catholics from the Orthodox who had held it during the Soviet period. Much had not changed, except the antimension (corporal) on the main altar, since both confessions were employing similar rites. But I did notice some subtle alter- ations. Once again, the side altars were in full use, a rarity today in western Roman Catholic churches. The mass or liturgy which had just been cele- brated on one of them resembled nothing I had previously seen in the Byzantine world and followed a latinized form of service long since disa- vowed by the Uniats themselves. All, including the proskomedia (Byzantine 1 The name Užhorod is a modern invention of the nineteenth century and popularized during the time the region was part of Czechoslovakia during the last century.
    [Show full text]
  • Liturgical Ordering in Church Design;
    THE ARCHITECTURE OF LITURGY: LITURGICAL ORDERING IN CHURCH DESIGN; THE AUSTRALIAN EXPER IENCE IN PERSPECTIVE Stephen Paul Hackett A t hesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of the Built Environment The University of New South Wales Sydney, Australia 2011 Thesis/Dissertation Sheet Sumame or Family name: Hackett First name: Stephen Other name/s: Paul Abbreviation for degree as given in the University calendar: PhD School: Built Environment Faculty: Built Environment Title: The Architecture of Liturgy: Liturgical Ordering in Church Design; the Australian Experience in Perspective Abstract 350 words maximum: (PLEASE TYPE) 'Liturgical ordering' denotes the spatial arrangement of churches for celebration of Christian liturgy. Its evolution from the earliest of known church structures can be described In five epochs, the last of which continues to emerge. This evolutlon reveals liturgy as being the abiding and indispensable design determinant for churches. Among the constitutive elements or church architecture. liturgical ordering has received little scholarly attenllon. The Architecture of Liturgy: Uturgical Ordering In Church Design; the Australian Experience In Perspective sets out to remedy this. examining the development of liturgical ordering In Catholic churches during the twentieth and early twenty-first centuries. Inspired by the liturgical movement, these orderings gained prominence following Vatican Council II. 1962-1965, which enjoined that churches be built for the sacred murgy and the active participation of the faithful. The Implementation of this imperative brought about widespread lnnovallon In church design, most significantly through new and adapted liturgical orderings. mari<lng a major shift after centuries or standardised ordering In churches.
    [Show full text]
  • Church in the Middle: Greek-Catholics in Central and Eastern Europe
    Religion, State and Society, Vol. 20, Nos 3 & 4, 1992 Church in the Middle: Greek-Catholics in Central and Eastern Europe SERGE KELEHER Greek-Catholicism is the particular expression of Christianity that practises Eastern Orthodox liturgy, spirituality, discipline and theology, in communion with the Roman Catholic Church.' In Europe the Greek-Catholic churches are mostly located along the geographic-religious 'fault line' that separates East from Wes!.' The oldest continuous group of Greek-Catholics is found in Sicily and Calabria, the classic Magna Graecia, with a monastery at Grottaferrata, just outside Rome, that will celebrate its millennium in 2004. The large majority of Greek-Catholics are in Eastern Europe, and have suddenly come to our attention because of their renaissance after the communist persecution, their inadvertent position as an ecumenical stumbling-block suddenly impeding the dialogue between Roman Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy, and their political role in Ukraine and Romania. Historical Background: General Ever since the Roman Catholic Church and the Eastern Orthodox Church lapsed from full communion, there have been efforts to restore that communion. Some of these efforts made matters worse - such as the infamous Fourth Crusade, seeking to impose a solution by military force. Other attempts tried to achieve progress through forms of dialogue, such as the Council of Florence, but proved unsuccessful. Over the centuries, many Roman Catholics and Eastern Orthodox lost sight of each other, and began to think of one another - if at all - as distant heretics and schismatics, rather than as an estranged part of the one Church. With the fall of Constantinople to the Ottoman Turks in 1453, the situation of Christians in the Muslim countries became precarious, and Christians naturally looked around for protection.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural and Calendar Festivals in Medieval Slovenia
    Locating the festival, positioning the feast: natural and calendar festivals in medieval Slovenia Article Accepted Version Ča val, S. (2018) Locating the festival, positioning the feast: natural and calendar festivals in medieval Slovenia. World Archaeology, 50 (2). pp. 300-322. ISSN 0043-8243 doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.2018.1538814 Available at http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/82779/ It is advisable to refer to the publisher’s version if you intend to cite from the work. See Guidance on citing . To link to this article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00438243.2018.1538814 Publisher: Taylor & Francis All outputs in CentAUR are protected by Intellectual Property Rights law, including copyright law. Copyright and IPR is retained by the creators or other copyright holders. Terms and conditions for use of this material are defined in the End User Agreement . www.reading.ac.uk/centaur CentAUR Central Archive at the University of Reading Reading’s research outputs online Workflow: Annotated pdf, CrossRef and tracked changes PROOF COVER SHEET Journal acronym: RWAR Author(s): Saša Čaval Article title: Natural and calendar festivals in medieval Slovenia Article no: 1538814 Enclosures: 1) Query sheet 2) Article proofs Dear Author, 1. Please check these proofs carefully. It is the responsibility of the corresponding author to check these and approve or amend them. A second proof is not normally provided. Taylor & Francis cannot be held responsible for uncorrected errors, even if introduced during the production process. Once your corrections have been added to the article, it will be considered ready for publication. Please limit changes at this stage to the correction of errors.
    [Show full text]
  • Liturgy of the Hours and Islamic Salat
    LITURGY OF THE HOURS AND ISLAMIC SALAT A Comparative study of Public-Liturgical Worship of Christians and Muslims Dissertation presented in fulfilment of the requirements for the Doctorate Degree in the Faculty of Catholic Theology at the Otto-Friedrich-University Bamberg Alfred C. Anazodo 2001 II TABLE OF CONTENTS Abbreviations, Sources and Bibliography....................................................................VIII 1. General abbreviations, Periodicals, Magazines, Lexica and collections..............VIII 2. Sources......................................................................................................................X 3. Bibliography .........................................................................................................XIII PREFACE.........................................................................................................................1 CHAPTER ONE............................................................................................................... 4 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................. 4 1.1 General remarks on worship................................................................................... 4 1.1.1 Ritual in worship ............................................................................................. 7 1.1.2 Ritual-Symbolic Action .................................................................................... 7 1.2 Remarks on Christian worship ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Orientation of Scottish Churches, Illustrated by an Analysis Op Some Examples in Aberdeenshire and Banffshire
    THE ORIENTATION OF SCOTTISH CHURCHES. 1691 III. THE ORIENTATION OF SCOTTISH CHURCHES, ILLUSTRATED BY AN ANALYSIS OP SOME EXAMPLES IN ABERDEENSHIRE AND BANFFSHIRE .. EELES C B . yF , F.R.HisT.S., F.S.A. SCOT. orientatioe Th f ancieno n t churche featura s i s constano es sod -an t familiar that it appears to have escaped investigation in Scotland. A certain amount of attention has been given to it further south, but with no very definite result, except to emphasise the almost universal adoptio e practiceth f o n . With notable exceptions, chiefl Italyn i y , all Christians observe t Reformatiodowde i th o nt n period. Since that time, especiall recenn yi t days e morth , e extreme Protestant then o s - one hand Romad an , n Catholic othere th n ,o st aside i hav t ese , while Anglican and Oriental Christians have continued to maintain it. Orientation include e congregationth s t leas a e officiatinr th o t, g clergy, facing east during prayer e buildinth , f churchege o th d an s placin accorto altargof as d sso wit h this principle buriathe of l and , the dead with the feet towards the east. The principle appears to- belong to natural religion, and not to be peculiar to Christianity. It would seem, however, that the Jews prayed facing west, both in the Temple and in the synagogues. Maimonides, tracing this to Abra- ham praying upon Mount Moriah, considers that it was done in opposi- tion to Gentile practice.1 Tertullian, c. A.D.
    [Show full text]