Maysvillian Stage of the Cincinnati Arch, Indiana, Kentucky, and Ohio, U.S.A
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Sequence Stratigraphy of the Late Ordovician (Katian), Maysvillian Stage of the Cincinnati Arch, Indiana, Kentucky, and Ohio, U.S.A. A thesis submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science In the Department of Geology McMicken College of Arts and Sciences By Thomas J. Schramm B.S. State University of New York College at New Paltz S.U.N.Y. New Paltz 2009 Committee Chair: Carlton E. Brett, Ph.D. i Abstract: Richly fossiliferous strata of the Cincinnati area have a long history of study. An abundance of lithologic names have been applied to various shallow marine depositional facies across the Cincinnati Arch in Indiana, Kentucky and Ohio, U.S.A. The current study builds upon recent, high-resolution stratigraphic studies of the Edenian Stage, Kope Formation, and applies a similar approach to the Maysvillian Stage strata of the Cincinnati Arch. Strata of the Maysvillian Stage were deposited in shallower water conditions than the underlying Kope Fm., resulting in an increased localization of facies. Maysvillian Stage strata have previously been treated as a mosaic of local facies with little to no continuity or small-scale cyclicity; however, correlation of time-synchronous marker horizons and sequence stratigraphic units the Maysvillian Stage throughout the Cincinnati Arch demonstrates that this is not the case and suggests widespread, allocyclic controls on sedimentation. Based upon the documentation of widely traceable horizons the current study establishes a fourth order sequence stratigraphy for the Cincinnati Arch. As an independent test of lithologic-cycle correlation, the current study has utilized magnetic susceptibility in vertical successions, and attempts to quantify small scale cycles within the Maysvillian Stage. Magnetic susceptibility in combination with field observations has revealed previously overlooked unconformities, such as the basal Bellevue Mbr. unconformity, which oversteps the Miamitown Shale to the east of Cincinnati. In addition, intervals of relatively thick siltstone beds, commonly with soft-sediment deformation, are identified as an indicator of falling stage systems tracts, formed during forced regressions. In contrast, intervals of relatively compact skeletal pack and grainstones with evidence of condensation, such as hardgrounds indicate transgressive systems ii tracts. Using these criteria the current study provides a newly established fourth order sequence stratigraphic framework, and a reevaluation of third order depositional sequences on the Cincinnati Arch. Revisions include reinterpretation of key surfaces, some of which record flooding surfaces, previously identified as sequence boundaries, identification of previously unrecognized sequence boundaries, and replacement of “shazam” lines of imaginary facies transition by a more realistic framework of small-scale cycles. Empirical evidence of sea level variation within small-scale cycles, based upon sedimentary structures in shallow water facies, e.g., changes from mud-cracked strata to fully marine carbonate deposits, suggests sea-level change as the principal mechanism for small-scale cycle generation; widespread correlation of these cycles indicates an allocyclic forcing mechanism, probably eustasy. Differences in thickness of mudstone deposits between Cincinnatian units are attributed to tectonic and climatic changes occurring in the orogenic hinterland during the Late Ordovician, affecting the supply of fine-grained siliciclastics to offshore areas. Synthesizing sequence stratigraphy of the Cincinnati Arch with observation of coeval strata in New York, and the Southern Appalachians the current study also recognizes variations in the magnitude of base-level change to peripheral foreland bulge migration occurring during waning phases of the Taconic orogeny. Throughout the Cincinnatian, and other Paleozoic strata a three-fold motif of lithologic units has been observed: the current study offers a discussion of the naming of lithologic units and the hierarchical nature of depositional cycles associated with this phenomenon. iii iv Acknowledgements First and foremost, I would like to thank my parents for their continued support of my education in geology and moral support throughout the time of the writing of this thesis. I would like to thank close friends James Thomka and Nathan Marshall for continued moral support, field support, and useful discussion to this project. Mike DeSantis offered valuable discussion and advice contributing to the completion of this thesis. I greatly appreciate the support and revisions of members of my thesis committee: Carl Brett, Arnie Miller, Dave Meyer and Ben Dattilo. Without the teaching, guidance, hours of daily discussion, literally months spent together in the field, arguments, late night phone calls and emails, document revisions, of my advisor, Carl Brett this thesis would not be possible. I am eternally grateful for Carl’s “hit the ground running” and always “more the merrier” attitude. My introduction to Ben Dattilo, through Carl, was pivotal to the success of this project. Continuing in collaboration where Ben left off, his project advice, valuable discussion, field experience, and friendship have been critical to the success of this project. I would further like to thank the Dry Dredgers for their help, interest, and valuable discussions of this project. Specifically, Dan Cooper and Stephen Felton have been critical to the completion of this project. Dan provided useful advice and introduction to outcrops of the Corryville Mbr. No other living person has had more experience in the Cincinnatian strata than Steve Felton; knowledge of Cincinnatian beds, fauna, previous workers, and literature is impeccable. The knowledge of localities and Cincinnatian fossils held by Steve dwarfs that of generations of Cincinnatian workers. Steve’s valuabe insights, in addition to valuable v discussion, and field support have contributed strongly to this project, for which I am extremely thankful. I would like to thank Brooks Ellwood, my current advisor at LSU, for valuable advice, training, and revisions concerning Magnetic Susceptibility. I am grateful to University of Cincinnati undergraduate students, Adam Leu, Emily Wendler and Nick Bose for field assistantance. Likewise, advice on how to conduct a research from Attila Kilinc and Paul Potter has contributed strongly to this project. Funding for this project was generously provided by a Dry Dredgers, Paul Sanders Award; Geological Society of America, Student Research Grant; and an award from the Univeristy of Cincinnati Research Council. vi Preface Research of the Cincinnatian Series over the past 10 years has been termed a “Stratigraphic Renaissance” (McLaughlin et al., 2008), but the bulk of stratigraphic research has involved the Edenian Stage, Kope Formation. Correlation is a key component to studies of sedimentary strata, and without this knowledge other paleoecological, climatological, geochemical studies, etc. may be flawed and include errors. The intention of this research is to raise the base of knowledge out from the Edenian Stage, and up, into the Maysvillian Stage, using recent studies in the Kope Formation as a model. Together with Carl Brett and Ben Dattilo, I have conducted this research in order to kickstart further investigations occurring in the Cincinnatian, Maysvillian Stage. It is the hope of the author that the following chapters of this thesis will provide a refined sequence stratigraphic framework for strata of the Maysvillian Stage in its type area and will prompt other researchers to move their future studies out of the well studied Edenian, and move into the up and out, of the Maysvillian Stage and higher Richmondian Stage, in order to gain a further understanding paleoenvironments, paleoclimates, and paleobiology occurring during the Late Ordovician of the Cincinnati Arch. Chapters two-six of this thesis are intended for publication, or as part of a publication in a peer reviewed journal. Chapter One is provided as background reguarding sequence stratigraphic terms. McLaughlin, P.I., Brett, C.E., Holland, S.M., Storrs, S.W. 2008. Stratigraphic Renaissance in the Cincinnati Arch. Implications for Upper Ordovician Paleontology and Paleoecology. Cincinnati Museum Center Scientific Contributions. Number 2. vii Table of contents: Title Page: i Abstract: ii Blank Page-Copyright Notice: iv Acknowledgements: v Preface: vii Table of Contents: viii List of Table and Figures: xi Introduction 1 References 3 Chapter 1: Definition of Stratigraphic Sequences, Terms, and Model Used 5 References 14 Chapter 2: Facies Mosaics vs. Sequence Stratigraphy: using fine scale stratigraphic correlation to decode sedimentary facies in the Cincinnatian, Maysvillian Stage 16 Introduction 16 Traceable Horizons 18 Fairview Formation 18 McMillan Formation 27 Fourth Order Depositional Cycles 34 Corryville Member Cycles 44 Fourth order sequence stratgraphic framework 49 viii Discussion of Cycle Propagation and Development 52 Conclusions 53 References 55 Chapter 3: Regional Correlation of the Late Ordovician Cincinnatian, Maysvillian Stage Sequences using Magnetic Susceptibility 61 Abstract 61 Specific Aims 62 Background: MS, Milankovich Cycles, Cincinnatian 62 Cincinnatian Series 64 Methods 67 Outcrop Descriptions 68 Correlation and Interpretation using MS 72 Conclusions 81 References 83 Chapter 4: Third Order Sequence Stratigraphy of the Cincinnatian, Maysvillian Stage: