DOCSLIB.ORG

Satellites, Space and Security

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Satellites, Space and Security Satellites,Satellites, SpaceSpace andand SecuritySecurity Earth Observation Systems and Technolo- gies for civilian - and military - Purposes DI Dr. Norbert Frischauf ÖWF – ALPHA Austria - STP ITU 04.10.2010Small Satellites Symposium andSpace Workshop & Security Vortrag CZ TU, Prague, 03.03.2015- 1 - Manhattan, 12.09.2001; IKONOS@1m 03.03.2015 ITU Small Satellites Symposium and Workshop - 2 - Cape Canaveral, Pad 39A, 21.04.2005; Quickbird@0,6m 03.03.2015 ITU Small Satellites Symposium and Workshop - 3 - Space has always had a role as “Battle space”: From the early beginnings… • Beginnings – Science – Reconnaissance • Increased military Utilisation – Navigation (GPS) – Space reconnaissance (esp. ICBMs) – Control of own ICBMs and long range guided missiles (US/USSR) – Communication purposes – (SDI) 03.03.2015 ITU Small Satellites Symposium and Workshop - 4 - … until today (even though this is not made public) • Current Status – Space is an integral part of the US Defence Doctrine – Part of the Strategic Command – “Domination“ is the clear ambition • Roles – Guided missiles control – Early warning – Communication – Navigation – Weather prediction – Reconnaissance/Intelligence 03.03.2015 ITU Small Satellites Symposium and Workshop - 5 - Air and space reconnaissance became really hot in the cold war and Corona set the stage… • Cold War puts a prime role on reconnaissance - „Bomber/Missile Gap“ • 1954: U-2 Programme (CIA) – U-2 (SC: 25 km, 3000 NM) – Missions behind the iron curtain as of 1956 – 1.5.1960: Shot down of a U-2 (F. Powers) at Sverdlovsk (3 SA-2s) • 1955: US satellite activities are launched – 16.03.1955: General Operational Requirement No. 80 by the US Air Force – ARS Sentry Samos Corona 03.03.2015 ITU Small Satellites Symposium and Workshop - 6 - ... with missions that could be made for a thriller, lasting until today (Improved Crystal) • Resume of Corona: – 102 out of 145 missions were successful – 860000 photos / 39000 film canisters / 750E6 sqm • Further development of the US EO satellites: – KH-5: Argon (1962–1964; 6/12), m: 1274 kg – KH-6: Lanyard (1963; 1/3), m: 1500 kg – KH-7: Gambit (1963-1967; 36/38), m: 2000 kg, : 45 cm – KH-8: Gambit (1966-1984; 57/60), m: 3000 kg, : 45 / 15 cm – KH-9: Hexagon (1971-1986; 19/20), m: 11400 kg – KH-10: Dorian/MOL (1963-1969; 0; 1 G$) – KH-11: Kennan/Crystal (1976-1988; 9/10), m: 13500 kg – KH-12: Improved Crystal (1990- ;4/4), m: 19600 kg, life time: 10-12 years, : 10 cm 03.03.2015 ITU Small Satellites Symposium and Workshop - 7 - The “civilian“ version of KH-11 is well-known, not so the five “military“ brothers Resolution: More than a buzzword! Improved Crystal, m: 19600 kg, : 10 cm! 03.03.2015 ITU Small Satellites Symposium and Workshop - 9 - Nowadays everyone of us can obtain “Reconnaissance satellite data“ • IKONOS: – Launch: 24.09.1999, Athena II, Vandenberg – Operator: Space Imaging Inc. (USA) – Design: LM / Raytheon / Kodak – Mass: 726 kg; 1,8 x 1,8 x 1,6 m – Life time: 5-7 years, 900 photos/day – 4 bands, : 1m, 11 x 11 km • Quickbird – Launch: 18.10.2001, Delta II, VB – Operator: DigitalGlobe (USA) – Design: Ball Aerospace – Mass: 950 kg; 3 x 1,6 x 1,6 m – Life time: 5-7 years 03.03.2015– 4 bands, : 61cm,ITU Small 16,5 Satellites x 16,5 Symposium km and Workshop - 10 - Space Law: Between ambitions and reality • “Outer Space Treaty” of 1967 – To govern the exploration/utilisation of space – Prohibits the occupation of celestial bodies – Bans the stationing of nuclear weapons or WOMD in Earth orbit and beyond – Space is to be used exclusively for peaceful purposes – International liability caused by space objects • Reality – No prohibition to station conventional weapons in EO – No clear distinction between airspace and 03.03.2015space (SDI ITU/ commercial Small Satellites Symposium spaceflight) and Workshop - 11 - Copernicus is an EU EO programme aiming for socio-economic and security benefits • Copernicus ( Global Monitoring for Environment and Security) – ESA / EC Programme to implement EO data in our daily lives (as of 2014) – Budget: 4.3 G€ for 2014-2020 – EO data shall be used within Grants 1 public projects (policy makers); subsidy 4 Forwards Prime example: Check-up of Federal farmer´s report EO Agricultural Service Reports on EU agricultural subsidies Entity findings Provider – 6 Thematic Areas: Forwards 6 Checks subsidy farmer´s • Land Monitoring (land use/cover change, soil, ...) Sends based report back 5 • Emergency Management (emergency response, 2 upon 3 with report humanitarian aid, civil protection, …) certain EO data conditions • Marine Monitoring (MSL, currents, oil spills, …) • Atmosphere Monitoring (observation of the atmosphere, solar radiation (UV), …) • Security (support to intelligence, early warning and crisis management operations) Farmer 04.10.2010• Climate Change (climate system,Space reliable & Security data) Vortrag - 12 - Small is beautiful – BRITE as an Austrian HST to perform high-res EO à la KH-11? … Resolution d 1.22 … Wavelength A d … Distance A … Aperture • Uni-BRITE / BRITE-Austria: • KH-11 Kennan/Crystal: – Aperture: 30 mm – Aperture: 2340 mm – Distance: 800 km – Distance: 300 km – Wavelength: 550 nm – Wavelength: 550 nm = 17.9 m = 8.6 cm Size matters (at least for EO satellites)!- 13 - Seeing Observing! “You see but you do not observe.” Sir Arthur Conan Doyle: The Memoirs of Sherlock Holmes 03.03.2015 ITU Small Satellites Symposium and Workshop - 14 -.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Start of the Manned Space Race by Andrew J
    The Start of the Manned Space Race by Andrew J. LePage November 1998 Introduction of Sputnik 1 and 2 in October and November of 1957 changed everything. At the same time NACA and the USAF were studying manned spaceflight (see The Beginnings of The first Sputnik launches were to affect the manned America's Man in Space Program in the October space program in several ways. The impact the 1998 issue of SpaceViews), comparable efforts were launch of Sputnik 1 had on the West led Soviet quietly taking place independently in the Soviet Primer Nikita Khrushchev to exploit space missions Union . As with virtually every other aspect of the for their propaganda value. Development of more Soviet Union's early space program, Chief Designer advanced and spectacular missions like the manned Sergei P. Korolev and his OKB-1 (Experimental satellite program were immediately approved and Design Bureau No. 1) lead the way. All during the placed on the fast track. Also at the insistence of 1950s when Korolev and his colleague, Mikhail K. Khrushchev, Sputnik 2 was launched with a dog on Tikhonravov of NII-4 (Scientific Research Institute board. While thermal control problems marred the No. 4), were pushing their original Earth satellite mission, it did demonstrate that weightlessness would proposal, it also included plans to send probes to the not be a major hazard for a human (see Sputnik 2: Moon and men into orbit. When the satellite The First Animal in Space in the November 1997 proposal was finally adopted by the Soviet issue of SpaceViews). As a result, Korolev scrapped government on January 30, 1956, the lunar probe and his initial, more conservative approach and moved manned satellite projects were also given the green ahead with a much more aggressive plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Detecting, Tracking and Imaging Space Debris
    r bulletin 109 — february 2002 Detecting, Tracking and Imaging Space Debris D. Mehrholz, L. Leushacke FGAN Research Institute for High-Frequency Physics and Radar Techniques, Wachtberg, Germany W. Flury, R. Jehn, H. Klinkrad, M. Landgraf European Space Operations Centre (ESOC), Darmstadt, Germany Earth’s space-debris environment tracked, with estimates for the number of Today’s man-made space-debris environment objects larger than 1 cm ranging from 100 000 has been created by the space activities to 200 000. that have taken place since Sputnik’s launch in 1957. There have been more than 4000 The sources of this debris are normal launch rocket launches since then, as well as many operations (Fig. 2), certain operations in space, other related debris-generating occurrences fragmentations as a result of explosions and such as more than 150 in-orbit fragmentation collisions in space, firings of satellite solid- events. rocket motors, material ageing effects, and leaking thermal-control systems. Solid-rocket Among the more than 8700 objects larger than 10 cm in Earth orbits, motors use aluminium as a catalyst (about 15% only about 6% are operational satellites and the remainder is space by mass) and when burning they emit debris. Europe currently has no operational space surveillance aluminium-oxide particles typically 1 to 10 system, but a powerful radar facility for the detection and tracking of microns in size. In addition, centimetre-sized space debris and the imaging of space objects is available in the form objects are formed by metallic aluminium melts, of the 34 m dish radar at the Research Establishment for Applied called ‘slag’.
    [Show full text]
  • Weaponisation of Space
    MANEKSHAW PAPER No. 45, 2014 Weaponisation of Space Puneet Bhalla D W LAN ARFA OR RE F S E T R U T D N IE E S C CLAWS VI CT N OR ISIO Y THROUGH V KNOWLEDGE WORLD Centre for Land Warfare Studies KW Publishers Pvt Ltd New Delhi New Delhi Editorial Team Editor-in-Chief : Maj Gen Dhruv C Katoch SM, VSM (Retd) Managing Editor : Ms Geetika Kasturi D W LAN ARFA OR RE F S E T R U T D N IE E S C CLAWS VI CT N OR ISIO Y THROUGH V Centre for Land Warfare Studies RPSO Complex, Parade Road, Delhi Cantt, New Delhi 110010 Phone: +91.11.25691308 Fax: +91.11.25692347 email: [email protected] website: www.claws.in The Centre for Land Warfare Studies (CLAWS), New Delhi, is an autonomous think tank dealing with national security and conceptual aspects of land warfare, including conventional and sub-conventional conflicts and terrorism. CLAWS conducts research that is futuristic in outlook and policy-oriented in approach. © 2014, Centre for Land Warfare Studies (CLAWS), New Delhi Disclaimer: The contents of this paper are based on the analysis of materials accessed from open sources and are the personal views of the author. The contents, therefore, may not be quoted or cited as representing the views or policy of the Government of India, or Integrated Headquarters of MoD (Army), or the Centre for Land Warfare Studies. KNOWLEDGE WORLD www.kwpub.com Published in India by Kalpana Shukla KW Publishers Pvt Ltd 4676/21, First Floor, Ansari Road, Daryaganj, New Delhi 110002 Phone: +91 11 23263498 / 43528107 email: [email protected] l www.kwpub.com Contents Abbreviations v 1.
    [Show full text]
  • High Altitude Nuclear Detonations (HAND) Against Low Earth Orbit Satellites ("HALEOS")
    High Altitude Nuclear Detonations (HAND) Against Low Earth Orbit Satellites ("HALEOS") DTRA Advanced Systems and Concepts Office April 2001 1 3/23/01 SPONSOR: Defense Threat Reduction Agency - Dr. Jay Davis, Director Advanced Systems and Concepts Office - Dr. Randall S. Murch, Director BACKGROUND: The Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) was founded in 1998 to integrate and focus the capabilities of the Department of Defense (DoD) that address the weapons of mass destruction (WMD) threat. To assist the Agency in its primary mission, the Advanced Systems and Concepts Office (ASCO) develops and maintains and evolving analytical vision of necessary and sufficient capabilities to protect United States and Allied forces and citizens from WMD attack. ASCO is also charged by DoD and by the U.S. Government generally to identify gaps in these capabilities and initiate programs to fill them. It also provides support to the Threat Reduction Advisory Committee (TRAC), and its Panels, with timely, high quality research. SUPERVISING PROJECT OFFICER: Dr. John Parmentola, Chief, Advanced Operations and Systems Division, ASCO, DTRA, (703)-767-5705. The publication of this document does not indicate endorsement by the Department of Defense, nor should the contents be construed as reflecting the official position of the sponsoring agency. 1 Study Participants • DTRA/AS • RAND – John Parmentola – Peter Wilson – Thomas Killion – Roger Molander – William Durch – David Mussington – Terry Heuring – Richard Mesic – James Bonomo • DTRA/TD – Lewis Cohn • Logicon RDA – Les Palkuti – Glenn Kweder – Thomas Kennedy – Rob Mahoney – Kenneth Schwartz – Al Costantine – Balram Prasad • Mission Research Corp. – William White 2 3/23/01 2 Focus of This Briefing • Vulnerability of commercial and government-owned, unclassified satellite constellations in low earth orbit (LEO) to the effects of a high-altitude nuclear explosion.
    [Show full text]
  • STS-108/ISS-UF1 Quick-Look Data Spaceflight Now
    STS-108/ISS-UF1 Quick-Look Data Spaceflight Now Rank/Seats STS-108 ISS-UF1 Family/TIS DOB STS-108 Hardware and Flight Data Commander Navy Capt. Dominic L. Gorie M/2 05/02/57 STS Mission STS-108/ISS-UF1 Up 44; STS-91,99 25.8 * Orbiter Endeavour (17th flight) Pilot/IV Navy Lt. Cmdr. Mark Kelly M/2 02/21/64 Payload Crew transfer; ISS resupply Up 37; Rookie 4.75 Launch 05:19:28 PM 12.05.01 MS1/EV1 Linda Godwin, Ph.D. M/2 07/02/52 Pad/MLP 39B/MLP1 Up/Down-5 49; STS-37,59,76 31.15 Prime TAL Zaragoza MS2/EV2/FE Daniel Tani M/0 02/01/61 Landing 01:03:00 PM 12.17.01 Up 40; Rookie 4.75 Landing Site Kennedy Space Center Duration 11/19:44 ISS-4 Air Force Col. Carl Walz M/2 09/06/55 Down-5 46; STS-51,65,79 39.25 Endeavour 167/13:26:34 ISS-4 CIS AF Col. Yuri Onufrienko M/3 02/06/61 STS Program 943/13:26:34 Down-6 40; Mir-21 197.75 ISS-4 Navy Capt. Daniel Bursch M/4 07/25/57 MECO Ha/Hp 169 X 40 nm Down-7 44; STS-51,68,77 35.85 OMS Ha/Hp 175 X 105 nm ISS Ha/Hp 235 X 229 (varies) ISS-3 Frank Culbertson M/5 05/15/49 Period 91.6 minutes Down-6 52; STS-38, 51,ISS-3 136.89 Inclination 51.6 degrees ISS-3 Mikhail Tyurin M/1 03/02/60 Velocity 17,212 mph Down-7 40; ISS-3 122.59 EOM Miles 4,467,219 miles ISS-3 CIS Lt.
    [Show full text]
  • Corona KH-4B Satellites
    Corona KH-4B Satellites The Corona reconnaissance satellites, developed in the immediate aftermath of SPUTNIK, are arguably the most important space vehicles ever flown, and that comparison includes the Apollo spacecraft missions to the moon. The ingenuity and elegance of the Corona satellite design is remarkable even by current standards, and the quality of its panchromatic imagery in 1967 was almost as good as US commercial imaging satellites in 1999. Yet, while the moon missions were highly publicized and praised, the CORONA project was hidden from view; that is until February 1995, when President Clinton issued an executive order declassifying the project, making the design details, the operational description, and the imagery available to the public. The National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) has a web site that describes the project, and the hardware is on display in the National Air and Space Museum. Between 1960 and 1972, Corona satellites flew 94 successful missions providing overhead reconnaissance of the Soviet Union, China and other denied areas. The imagery debunked the bomber and missile gaps, and gave the US a factual basis for strategic assessments. It also provided reliable mapping data. The Soviet Union had previously “doctored” their maps to render them useless as targeting aids and Corona largely solved this problem. The Corona satellites employed film, which was returned to Earth in a capsule. This was not an obvious choice for reconnaissance. Studies first favored television video with magnetic storage of images and radio downlink when over a receiving ground station. Placed in an orbit high enough to minimize the effects of atmospheric drag, a satellite could operate for a year, sending images to Earth on a timely basis.
    [Show full text]
  • Jacques Tiziou Space Collection
    Jacques Tiziou Space Collection Isaac Middleton and Melissa A. N. Keiser 2019 National Air and Space Museum Archives 14390 Air & Space Museum Parkway Chantilly, VA 20151 [email protected] https://airandspace.si.edu/archives Table of Contents Collection Overview ........................................................................................................ 1 Administrative Information .............................................................................................. 1 Biographical / Historical.................................................................................................... 1 Scope and Contents........................................................................................................ 2 Arrangement..................................................................................................................... 2 Names and Subjects ...................................................................................................... 2 Container Listing ............................................................................................................. 4 Series : Files, (bulk 1960-2011)............................................................................... 4 Series : Photography, (bulk 1960-2011)................................................................. 25 Jacques Tiziou Space Collection NASM.2018.0078 Collection Overview Repository: National Air and Space Museum Archives Title: Jacques Tiziou Space Collection Identifier: NASM.2018.0078 Date: (bulk 1960s through
    [Show full text]
  • National Reconnaissance Office Review and Redaction Guide
    NRO Approved for Release 16 Dec 2010 —Tep-nm.T7ymqtmthitmemf- (u) National Reconnaissance Office Review and Redaction Guide For Automatic Declassification Of 25-Year-Old Information Version 1.0 2008 Edition Approved: Scott F. Large Director DECL ON: 25x1, 20590201 DRV FROM: NRO Classification Guide 6.0, 20 May 2005 NRO Approved for Release 16 Dec 2010 (U) Table of Contents (U) Preface (U) Background 1 (U) General Methodology 2 (U) File Series Exemptions 4 (U) Continued Exemption from Declassification 4 1. (U) Reveal Information that Involves the Application of Intelligence Sources and Methods (25X1) 6 1.1 (U) Document Administration 7 1.2 (U) About the National Reconnaissance Program (NRP) 10 1.2.1 (U) Fact of Satellite Reconnaissance 10 1.2.2 (U) National Reconnaissance Program Information 12 1.2.3 (U) Organizational Relationships 16 1.2.3.1. (U) SAF/SS 16 1.2.3.2. (U) SAF/SP (Program A) 18 1.2.3.3. (U) CIA (Program B) 18 1.2.3.4. (U) Navy (Program C) 19 1.2.3.5. (U) CIA/Air Force (Program D) 19 1.2.3.6. (U) Defense Recon Support Program (DRSP/DSRP) 19 1.3 (U) Satellite Imagery (IMINT) Systems 21 1.3.1 (U) Imagery System Information 21 1.3.2 (U) Non-Operational IMINT Systems 25 1.3.3 (U) Current and Future IMINT Operational Systems 32 1.3.4 (U) Meteorological Forecasting 33 1.3.5 (U) IMINT System Ground Operations 34 1.4 (U) Signals Intelligence (SIGINT) Systems 36 1.4.1 (U) Signals Intelligence System Information 36 1.4.2 (U) Non-Operational SIGINT Systems 38 1.4.3 (U) Current and Future SIGINT Operational Systems 40 1.4.4 (U) SIGINT
    [Show full text]
  • Securing Japan an Assessment of Japan´S Strategy for Space
    Full Report Securing Japan An assessment of Japan´s strategy for space Report: Title: “ESPI Report 74 - Securing Japan - Full Report” Published: July 2020 ISSN: 2218-0931 (print) • 2076-6688 (online) Editor and publisher: European Space Policy Institute (ESPI) Schwarzenbergplatz 6 • 1030 Vienna • Austria Phone: +43 1 718 11 18 -0 E-Mail: [email protected] Website: www.espi.or.at Rights reserved - No part of this report may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or for any purpose without permission from ESPI. Citations and extracts to be published by other means are subject to mentioning “ESPI Report 74 - Securing Japan - Full Report, July 2020. All rights reserved” and sample transmission to ESPI before publishing. ESPI is not responsible for any losses, injury or damage caused to any person or property (including under contract, by negligence, product liability or otherwise) whether they may be direct or indirect, special, incidental or consequential, resulting from the information contained in this publication. Design: copylot.at Cover page picture credit: European Space Agency (ESA) TABLE OF CONTENT 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background and rationales ............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Objectives of the Study ................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Methodology
    [Show full text]
  • A4e,,Moct Elel-Tl7s4'ste1s
    SPACE STATION THERMAL CONTROL SURFACES C. R. Maag M. T. Grenier VOLUME It - LITERATURE SEARCH PREPARED FOR NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION MARSHALL SPACE FLIGHT CENTER, ALABAMA 35812 CONTRACT NAS 8-32637 Report 5666 March 1978 Volume I[ A4E,,MOCT ELEL-TL7S4'STE1S AZUSA. CALIFORNIA S(NASA-CE-150668) SPACE STA TION THERMA1. N78-22137 CONTPBOL SURFACES. VOLUME 2: LITERATURE SEARCH Interim Report, 4 Aug. 1977 - 4 Feb. 1978 (Aerojet Electrosystems Co-) 410 p Unclas BC A18/MF A01 CSCI 05A GI3/15 645 Report 5666 FOREWORD This interim report describes results of the first six months of a study on Contract NAS 8-32637, "Space Station Thermal Control Surfaces." The contract was initiated on 4 August 1977 as a-6-month study to assess the deficiencies between the state of the art in thermal--control surface technology and that which would be required for both a 25-kW power module and a 25-year­ mission space station. The Scope of Work of the contract has been modified to include ad­ ditional emphasis on Task I, "Requirements Analysis," and the period of per­ formance will be extended for an additional eight months of effort. The final report is being deferred until the end of the extended period of performance. This report covers the period of 4 August 1977 to 4 February 1978,) and is submitted in two volumes. The literature search and survey portion of this study are contained in Volume II. This study was performed by personnel of Aerojet ElectroSystems Company, for the Space Sciences Laboratory of NASA-Marshall Flight Center.
    [Show full text]
  • Horowitz, Scott J
    Biographical Data Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center Houston, Texas 77058 National Aeronautics and Space Administration SCOTT J. “DOC” HOROWITZ, PH.D. (COLONEL, USAF, RET.) NASA ASTRONAUT (FORMER) PERSONAL DATA: Born March 24, 1957, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, but considers Thousand Oaks, California, to be his hometown. Married to the former Lisa Marie Kern. They have three children. He enjoys designing, building, and flying home-built aircraft, restoring automobiles, and running. His father, Seymour B. Horowitz, resides in Thousand Oaks, California. His mother, Iris D. Chester, resides in Bluffton, South Carolina. Lisa’s mother, Joan Ecker, resides in Jensen Beach, Florida. EDUCATION: Graduated from Newbury Park High School, Newbury Park, California, in 1974; received a bachelor of science degree in engineering from California State University at Northridge in 1978; a master of science degree in aerospace engineering from Georgia Institute of Technology in 1979; and a doctorate in aerospace engineering from Georgia Institute of Technology in 1982. SPECIAL HONORS: Distinguished Flying Cross; NASA Exceptional Service Medal (1997, 2001); Defense Meritorious Service Medal (1997); NASA Space Flight Medals (STS-75 1996, STS-82 1997, STS-101 2000, STS-105 2001); Defense Superior Service Medal (1996); USAF Test Pilot School Class 90A Distinguished Graduate (1990); Combat Readiness Medal (1989); Air Force Commendation Medals (1987, 1989); F-15 Pilot, 22TFS, Hughes Trophy (1988); F-15 Pilot, 22TFS, CINCUSAFE Trophy; Systems Command Quarterly Scientific & Engineering Technical Achievement Award (1986); Master T- 38 Instructor Pilot (1986); Daedalean (1986); 82nd Flying Training Wing Rated Officer of the Quarter (1986); Outstanding Young Men In America (1985); Outstanding T-38 Instructor Pilot (1985); Outstanding Doctoral Research Award for 1981-82 (1982); Sigma Xi Scientific Research Society (1980); Tau Beta Pi Engineering Honor Society (1978); 1st Place ASME Design Competition.
    [Show full text]
  • Read Ebook # 2001 in Spaceflight: 2001 Mars Odyssey, Progress
    UARRFEM99WX3 \\ Doc \ 2001 in spaceflight: 2001 Mars Odyssey, Progress M1-5, Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe,... 2001 in spacefligh t: 2001 Mars Odyssey, Progress M1-5, W ilkinson Microwave A nisotropy Probe, Genesis, Geosynch ronous Satellite Launch V eh icle Filesize: 1.18 MB Reviews This publication will never be effortless to get started on reading through but very entertaining to read through. It normally is not going to expense too much. I discovered this publication from my dad and i encouraged this book to find out. (Otilia Schinner) DISCLAIMER | DMCA VF3QZGPBWG7N < eBook > 2001 in spaceflight: 2001 Mars Odyssey, Progress M1-5, Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe,... 2001 IN SPACEFLIGHT: 2001 MARS ODYSSEY, PROGRESS M1-5, WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE, GENESIS, GEOSYNCHRONOUS SATELLITE LAUNCH VEHICLE To save 2001 in spaceflight: 2001 Mars Odyssey, Progress M1-5, Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe, Genesis, Geosynchronous Satellite Launch Vehicle PDF, please access the web link listed below and download the document or have accessibility to additional information that are highly relevant to 2001 IN SPACEFLIGHT: 2001 MARS ODYSSEY, PROGRESS M1-5, WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE, GENESIS, GEOSYNCHRONOUS SATELLITE LAUNCH VEHICLE book. Books LLC, Wiki Series, 2016. Paperback. Book Condition: New. PRINT ON DEMAND Book; New; Publication Year 2016; Not Signed; Fast Shipping from the UK. No. book. Read 2001 in spaceflight: 2001 Mars Odyssey, Progress M1-5, Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe, Genesis, Geosynchronous Satellite Launch Vehicle Online Download PDF 2001 in spaceflight: 2001 Mars Odyssey, Progress M1-5, Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe, Genesis, Geosynchronous Satellite Launch Vehicle CHJ6V1VJEKRR » Book ~ 2001 in spaceflight: 2001 Mars Odyssey, Progress M1-5, Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe,..
    [Show full text]