DOCSLIB.ORG

Commercial Human Spaceflight Crew Training Survey February 2008 About the Office of Commercial Space Transportation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Commercial Human Spaceflight Crew Training Survey February 2008 About the Office of Commercial Space Transportation FAA CommercialCommercial Space Space TransportationTransportation HQ-080204 Commercial Human Spaceflight Crew Training Survey February 2008 About the Office of Commercial Space Transportation The Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Commercial Space Transportation, licenses and regulates U.S. commercial space launch and reentry activity as well as the operation of non- federal launch and reentry sites as authorized by Executive Order 12465 and Title 49 United States Code, Subtitle IX, Chapter 701 (formerly the Commercial Space Launch Act). The Office’s mission is to ensure public health and safety and the safety of property while protecting the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States during commercial launch and reentry operations. In addition, the Office is directed to encourage, promote, and facilitate commercial space launches and reentries. Additional information concerning commercial space transportation can be found at http://ast.faa.gov. NOTICE Use of trade names, services, or images associated with corporate entities in this document does not constitute official endorsement of such products, services, or corporate entities, either expressed or implied, by the Federal Aviation Administration. Available from Federal Aviation Administration Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation 800 Independence Avenue, S.W., Rm. 331 Washington, D.C. 20591 http://ast.faa.gov 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS HUMAN SPACEFLIGHT TRAINING OVERVIEW................................................................................... SPACE SHUTTLE TRAINING................................................................................................................................................4 SOYUZ TRAINING...............................................................................................................................................................4 STUDY OVERVIEW........................................................................................................... PROFILES OVERVIEW........................................................................................................ PHYSIOLOGICAL TRAINING................................................................................................... ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY POLYTECHNIC ...................................................................................................................7 CAMI – FAA CIVIL AEROSPACE MEDICAL INSTITUTE ...................................................................................................8 EXECUTIVE AEROSPACE PHYSIOLOGY TRAINING ..........................................................................................................10 NATIONAL AEROSPACE TRAINING AND RESEARCH (NASTAR) CENTER .....................................................................11 OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES– TULSA ........................................................12 UND AEROSPACE............................................................................................................................................................13 HIGH PERFORMANCE JET..................................................................................................... INTERNATIONAL JETS, L-39 PARTS & MAINTENANCE, INC..........................................................................................14 JETWARBIRD TRAINING CENTER.....................................................................................................................................15 AURORA AEROSPACE ......................................................................................................................................................16 HIGH PERFORMANCE GLIDERS................................................................................................ COLORADO SOARING ASSOCIATION (CSA)....................................................................................................................17 ORANGE COUNTY SOARING ASSOCIATION (OCSA) ......................................................................................................19 THE CHICAGO GLIDER CLUB (CGC)...............................................................................................................................20 TURF SOARING SCHOOL (TSS)........................................................................................................................................22 PARACHUTE TRAINING PROVIDERS............................................................................................ SILVER PARACHUTE SALES & SERVICE (SPSS) .............................................................................................................24 EMERGENCY PARACHUTE MANUFACTURERS.................................................................................................................25 PARACHUTE FLIGHT TRAINING SIMULATOR....................................................................................................................27 UNUSUAL ATTITUDE TRAINING ................................................................................................ APS EMERGENCY MANEUVER TRAINING.......................................................................................................................28 RICH STOWELL’S AVIATION LEARNING CENTER ...........................................................................................................29 HIGH ALTITUDE FLIGHT TRAINING ............................................................................................. F-104 STARFIGHTERS DEMONSTRATION TEAM..............................................................................................................31 ADVANCED TRAINING SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL (ATSI) ............................................................................................32 HIGH-G TRAINING ............................................................................................................ CIVILIAN AERO AND SPACE TRAINING ACADEMY (CASTA)........................................................................................33 ORBITAL COMMERCE PROJECT (OCP)............................................................................................................................34 PRESSURE SUIT TRAINING.................................................................................................... DAVID CLARK COMPANY INCORPORATED (DAVID CLARK)..........................................................................................36 ORBITAL OUTFITTERS (OO)............................................................................................................................................37 2 FLIGHT SIMULATION.......................................................................................................... FLIGHTSAFETY INTERNATIONAL ....................................................................................................................................39 CAE, INC. ........................................................................................................................................................................40 SPACEFLIGHT OPERATIONS................................................................................................... BARRIOS TECHNOLOGY...................................................................................................................................................43 UNITED SPACE ALLIANCE ...............................................................................................................................................44 WYLE ...............................................................................................................................................................................46 MICROGRAVITY LOW-G TRAINING.............................................................................................. ZERO-G ............................................................................................................................................................................48 APPENDIX A: COMMERCIAL HUMAN SPACEFLIGHT CREW TRAINING OFFERED BY ORGANIZATION ............................................................................................................ APPENDIX B: PROFESSIONAL AEROSPACE PHYSIOLOGICAL ORGANIZATIONS.............................54 APPENDIX C: LIST OF AVAILABLE HIGH PERFORMANCE GLIDERS.................................................... 55 APPENDIX D: UNITED STATES PARACHUTE ASSOCIATION MEMBERS.............................................. 61 3 HUMAN SPACEFLIGHT TRAINING OVERVIEW A number of commercial, governmental, academic, and non-profit organizations exist that can provide commercial human spaceflight crew training and support. These training and support services range from teaching and simulating the physiological effects of working in the microgravity environment to high- fidelity simulation of spacecraft flight characteristics. A basic review of the traditional human spaceflight training programs provides a framework to understand the training roles that organizations profiled within this study can fill within commercial human spaceflight crew training programs. In 1959, the Soviet Union and the United States began to recruit military personnel for human spaceflight training. The first human spaceflight crews conducted rigorous training in areas such as general space sciences, space physiology, spacecraft systems, and survival training. This
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Soaring Magazine Index for 2000 to 2009/2000To2009 Organized by Subject
    Soaring Magazine Index for 2000 to 2009/2000to2009 organized by subject The contents have all been re-entered by hand, so thereare going to be typos and confusion between author and subject, etc... Please send along any corrections and suggestions for improvement. 1-26 Randy Rothe, Bullseye! - The 2002 1-26 Championships,December,2002, page 9 75th Anniversary of the Soaring Society of America SOARING - The Takeoff(1937 Reprint),May,2007, page 2 A, B, C Chuck Coyne, May,2009, page 4 Academy Air Force Richard Fucci, Air Force Academy Visit,May,2008, page 5 Accident Accident Report,August, 2000, page 8 Gavin Wills, Norm’sLast Flight,May,2002, page 26 Activity John Good, Soaring Participation Worldwide,July,2001, page 34 AeroTow Pete Guy, Crosswind LaunchinFredericksburg, Texas,April, 2009, pages "30, 31" Safety Peter Stauble, AeroTow Emergencies,September,2001, page 3 Aerobatics Chris Woods, Winter Haven,January,2003, cover Jason Stephens, WA G 2009 - A Glider Pilot’sPerspective,October,2009, page 40 Aerodynamics Joe Salz, Angle of Attack,September,2005, page 3 Deturbulator Jim Hendrix, Old Wineskins,April, 2009, page 5 Deturbulators Richard H. Johnson, Aflight Test Evaluation of the Sinha Wing Performance Enhancing Detur- bulators,May,2007, page 35 Flight Tests Dick Johnson and Dean Carswell, AFlight Test Evaluation of the Genesis 2 Sailplane,March, 2000, page 14 Richard H. Johnson and Dean Carswell, AFlight Test Evaluation of the 304 CZ Sailplane,July, 2000, page 30 Richard Johnson, AFlight Test Evaluation of the LAK-17A Racing Class Sailplane,March, 2001, page 25 Dick Johnson, AFlight Test Evaluation of the LAK-17A Racing Class Sailplane,July,2001, page 22 Chad Moore, Performance Testing the Russia AC-4c,September,2001, page 28 Richard H.
    [Show full text]
  • SPEAKERS TRANSPORTATION CONFERENCE FAA COMMERCIAL SPACE 15TH ANNUAL John R
    15TH ANNUAL FAA COMMERCIAL SPACE TRANSPORTATION CONFERENCE SPEAKERS COMMERCIAL SPACE TRANSPORTATION http://www.faa.gov/go/ast 15-16 FEBRUARY 2012 HQ-12-0163.INDD John R. Allen Christine Anderson Dr. John R. Allen serves as the Program Executive for Crew Health Christine Anderson is the Executive Director of the New Mexico and Safety at NASA Headquarters, Washington DC, where he Spaceport Authority. She is responsible for the development oversees the space medicine activities conducted at the Johnson and operation of the first purpose-built commercial spaceport-- Space Center, Houston, Texas. Dr. Allen received a B.A. in Speech Spaceport America. She is a recently retired Air Force civilian Communication from the University of Maryland (1975), a M.A. with 30 years service. She was a member of the Senior Executive in Audiology/Speech Pathology from The Catholic University Service, the civilian equivalent of the military rank of General of America (1977), and a Ph.D. in Audiology and Bioacoustics officer. Anderson was the founding Director of the Space from Baylor College of Medicine (1996). Upon completion of Vehicles Directorate at the Air Force Research Laboratory, Kirtland his Master’s degree, he worked for the Easter Seals Treatment Air Force Base, New Mexico. She also served as the Director Center in Rockville, Maryland as an audiologist and speech- of the Space Technology Directorate at the Air Force Phillips language pathologist and received certification in both areas. Laboratory at Kirtland, and as the Director of the Military Satellite He joined the US Air Force in 1980, serving as Chief, Audiology Communications Joint Program Office at the Air Force Space at Andrews AFB, Maryland, and at the Wiesbaden Medical and Missile Systems Center in Los Angeles where she directed Center, Germany, and as Chief, Otolaryngology Services at the the development, acquisition and execution of a $50 billion Aeromedical Consultation Service, Brooks AFB, Texas, where portfolio.
    [Show full text]
  • 99B Pgd.Indd
    Report on Comments — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 99B Report of the Committee on Report of the Committee on Electrical Systems (HEA-ELS) Health Care Facilities (HEA-AAC) Douglas S. Erickson, Chair Hugh O. Nash, Jr., Chair American Society for Healthcare Engineering, VI [U] Rep. American Society for Healthcare Engineering Nash Lipsey Burch, LLC, TN [SE] Constance Bobik, B&E Fire Safety Equipment Inc., FL [IM] Scott C. Brockman, Post Glover LifeLink, KY [M] Wayne L. Brannan, Medical University of South Carolina, SC [U] Dan Chisholm, Healthcare Engineering Network, FL [IM] Rep. American Society of Safety Engineers James H. Costley, Jr., Newcomb & Boyd, GA [SE] Michael A. Crowley, The RJA Group, Inc., TX [U] Rep. NFPA Health Care Section Rep. NFPA Health Care Section Richard E. Cutts, US Air Force, TX [E] Richard E. Cutts, US Air Force, TX [E] Herbert Daugherty, Electric Generating Systems Association, NJ [U] Joshua W. Elvove, US Department of Veterans Affairs, CO [U] Rep. Electrical Generating Systems Association Rep. US Department of Veterans Affairs James R. Iverson, Onan Corporation, MN [M] Marvin J. Fischer, Monroe Township, NJ [SE] Larry Lau, US Department of Veterans Affairs, DC [U] Thomas W. Gardner, Schirmer Engineering Corporation, GA [I] Rep. US Department of Veterans Affairs James R. Grimm, CDi Engineers, WA [SE] William E. Koffel, Koffel Associates, Inc., MD [SE] Edward A. Lobnitz, TLC Engineering for Architecture, FL [SE] George F. Stevens, US Department of Health & Human Services, AZ [E] James E. Meade, US Army Corps of Engineers, MD [U] Rep. US Dept. of Health & Human Services/IHS Joseph P. Murnane, Underwriters Laboratories Inc., NY [RT] Mayer D.
    [Show full text]
  • H M 7 P a G E 1 a MEMORIAL HONORING the MEMORY OF
    H A MEMORIAL M HONORING THE MEMORY OF THE SEVEN ASTRONAUTS WHO SERVED ON THE 7 P SPACE SHUTTLE COLUMBIA. a g e WHEREAS, the members of this chamber are grief-stricken at the loss of the 1 space shuttle Columbia and her seven astronauts on Saturday, February 1, 2003; and WHEREAS, the women and men who perished aboard Columbia embodied the very best qualities of mankind. Their intelligence, diligence and valor led to their selection for the space program and their presence on Columbia; and WHEREAS, today we pause not only to remember this tragedy, but we also pause to honor the achievements of seven exemplary people; and WHEREAS, let us recite the names of the seven astronauts: Rick D. Husband, age forty-five and the commander of Columbia. Commander Husband was a colonel in the United States air force. He was selected as an astronaut in 1994 and prior to this mission had logged two hundred thirty hours in space. His home was Amarillo, Texas; William C. McCool, age forty-one and the pilot for the mission. He was a commander in the United States navy and a former test pilot. Commander McCool became an astronaut in 1996, and this was his first space flight. His home was Lubbock, Texas; Michael P. Anderson, age forty-three and the payload commander for Columbia. Lieutenant Colonel Anderson was an air force man who grew up as the son of an air force man. Selected as an astronaut in 1994, he had previously logged over two hundred eleven hours in space.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role and Training of NASA Astronauts in the Post-Shuttle Era
    The Role and Training of NASA Astronauts in the Post-Shuttle Era Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board ∙ Air Force Studies Board ∙ Division on Engineering & Physical Sciences ∙ September 2011 As the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) retires the Space Shuttle and shifts involvement in International Space Station (ISS) operations, changes in the role and requirements of NASA’s Astronaut Corps will take place. At the request of NASA, the National Research Council (NRC) addressed three main questions about these changes: What should be the role and size of Johnson Space Center’s (JSC) Flight Crew Operations Directorate (FCOD); what will be the requirements of astronaut training facilities; and is the Astronaut Corps’ fleet of training aircraft a cost-effective means of preparing astronauts for NASA’s spaceflight program? This report presents an assessment of several issues driven by these questions. This report does not address explicitly the future of human spaceflight. Background Corps—defined in this report as the number he United States has been launching as- of astronauts qualified to fly into space. As Ttronauts into space for more than five of May 2011, the Astronaut Corps consist- decades and, for a majority of those years, ed of 61 people, compared with a peak size astronauts have been selected and trained of nearly 150 people in 2000. NASA uses a through NASA’s Astronaut Corps. Since its model for projecting minimum ISS manifest inception in 1959, the Astronaut Corps— requirements. Using the model on the next which is based at the Lyndon B. Johnson page, NASA has projected that the Astronaut Space Center (JSC) in Houston, Texas—has Corps will need a minimum of 55-60 astro- experienced periodic fluctuations in size and nauts to meet ISS crew requirements through training emphasis based on various program 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Payload Specialist Astronaut Bio: Taylor G. Wang
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center Houston, Texas 77058 Biographical Data TAYLOR G. WANG PAYLOAD SPECIALIST PERSONAL DATA: Born June 16, 1940, in Mainland China. He is a Physicist at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in California, and is a U.S. citizen. He is married, and has two sons. EDUCATION: Received a bachelor of science degree in physics in 1967, a master of science degree in physics in 1968, and a doctorate in physics in 1971, from the University of California at Los Angeles. ORGANIZATIONS: Member, American Physical Society, Materials Research Society, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Sigma Xi, and a Fellow in the Acoustical Society of America. EXPERIENCE: After completing his doctorate, Dr. Wang joined the California Institute of Technology Jet propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in 1972, as a senior scientist. He is currently Program Manager for Materials Processing in Space. At JPL he was responsible for the inception and development of containerless processing science and technology research. He is the Principal Investigator (PI) on the Spacelab 3 mission NASA Drop Dynamics (DDM) experiments, PI on the NASA SPAR Flight Experiment #77-18 "Dynamics of Liquid Bubble," PI on the NASA SPAR Flight Experiment #76- 20 "Containerless Processing Technology," and PI on the Department of Energy Experiment "Spherical Shell Technology." Dr. Wang has been conducting precursor drop dynamics experiments for the DDM in ground-based laboratories employing acoustic levitation systems, neutral buoyancy systems and drop towers, and in the near weightless environment provided by JSC's KC-135 airplane flights and SPAR rockets. These flights have helped to define the experimental parameters and procedures in the DDM experiments to be performed on Spacelab 3.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role and Training of NASA Astronauts In
    Co-chairs: Joe Rothenberg, Fred Gregory Briefing: October 18-19, 2011 Statement of Task An ad hoc committee will conduct a study and prepare a report on the activities of NASA’s human spaceflight crew office. In writing its report the committee will address the following questions: • How should the role and size of the activities managed by the Johnson Space Center Flight Crew Operations Directorate change after space shuttle retirement and completion of the assembly of the International Space Station (ISS)? • What are the requirements of crew-related ground-based facilities after the space shuttle program ends? • Is the fleet of aircraft used for the training the Astronaut Corps a cost-effective means of preparing astronauts to meet the requirements of NASA’s human spaceflight program? Are there more cost-effective means of meeting these training requirements? The NRC was not asked to consider whether or not the United States should continue human spaceflight, or whether there were better alternatives to achieving the nation’s goals without launching humans into space. Rather, the NRC’s charge was to assume that U.S. human spaceflight would continue. 2 Committee on Human Spaceflight Crew Operations • FREDERICK GREGORY, Lohfeld Consulting Group, Inc., Co-Chair • JOSEPH H. ROTHENBERG, Swedish Space Corporation, Co-Chair • MICHAEL J. CASSUTT, University of Southern California • RICHARD O. COVEY, United Space Alliance, LLC (retired) • DUANE DEAL, Stinger Ghaffarian Technologies, Inc. • BONNIE J. DUNBAR, President and CEO, Dunbar International, LLC • WILLIAM W. HOOVER, Independent Consultant • THOMAS D. JONES, Florida Institute of Human and Machine Cognition • FRANKLIN D. MARTIN, Martin Consulting, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • High Altitude Nuclear Detonations (HAND) Against Low Earth Orbit Satellites ("HALEOS")
    High Altitude Nuclear Detonations (HAND) Against Low Earth Orbit Satellites ("HALEOS") DTRA Advanced Systems and Concepts Office April 2001 1 3/23/01 SPONSOR: Defense Threat Reduction Agency - Dr. Jay Davis, Director Advanced Systems and Concepts Office - Dr. Randall S. Murch, Director BACKGROUND: The Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) was founded in 1998 to integrate and focus the capabilities of the Department of Defense (DoD) that address the weapons of mass destruction (WMD) threat. To assist the Agency in its primary mission, the Advanced Systems and Concepts Office (ASCO) develops and maintains and evolving analytical vision of necessary and sufficient capabilities to protect United States and Allied forces and citizens from WMD attack. ASCO is also charged by DoD and by the U.S. Government generally to identify gaps in these capabilities and initiate programs to fill them. It also provides support to the Threat Reduction Advisory Committee (TRAC), and its Panels, with timely, high quality research. SUPERVISING PROJECT OFFICER: Dr. John Parmentola, Chief, Advanced Operations and Systems Division, ASCO, DTRA, (703)-767-5705. The publication of this document does not indicate endorsement by the Department of Defense, nor should the contents be construed as reflecting the official position of the sponsoring agency. 1 Study Participants • DTRA/AS • RAND – John Parmentola – Peter Wilson – Thomas Killion – Roger Molander – William Durch – David Mussington – Terry Heuring – Richard Mesic – James Bonomo • DTRA/TD – Lewis Cohn • Logicon RDA – Les Palkuti – Glenn Kweder – Thomas Kennedy – Rob Mahoney – Kenneth Schwartz – Al Costantine – Balram Prasad • Mission Research Corp. – William White 2 3/23/01 2 Focus of This Briefing • Vulnerability of commercial and government-owned, unclassified satellite constellations in low earth orbit (LEO) to the effects of a high-altitude nuclear explosion.
    [Show full text]
  • STS-108/ISS-UF1 Quick-Look Data Spaceflight Now
    STS-108/ISS-UF1 Quick-Look Data Spaceflight Now Rank/Seats STS-108 ISS-UF1 Family/TIS DOB STS-108 Hardware and Flight Data Commander Navy Capt. Dominic L. Gorie M/2 05/02/57 STS Mission STS-108/ISS-UF1 Up 44; STS-91,99 25.8 * Orbiter Endeavour (17th flight) Pilot/IV Navy Lt. Cmdr. Mark Kelly M/2 02/21/64 Payload Crew transfer; ISS resupply Up 37; Rookie 4.75 Launch 05:19:28 PM 12.05.01 MS1/EV1 Linda Godwin, Ph.D. M/2 07/02/52 Pad/MLP 39B/MLP1 Up/Down-5 49; STS-37,59,76 31.15 Prime TAL Zaragoza MS2/EV2/FE Daniel Tani M/0 02/01/61 Landing 01:03:00 PM 12.17.01 Up 40; Rookie 4.75 Landing Site Kennedy Space Center Duration 11/19:44 ISS-4 Air Force Col. Carl Walz M/2 09/06/55 Down-5 46; STS-51,65,79 39.25 Endeavour 167/13:26:34 ISS-4 CIS AF Col. Yuri Onufrienko M/3 02/06/61 STS Program 943/13:26:34 Down-6 40; Mir-21 197.75 ISS-4 Navy Capt. Daniel Bursch M/4 07/25/57 MECO Ha/Hp 169 X 40 nm Down-7 44; STS-51,68,77 35.85 OMS Ha/Hp 175 X 105 nm ISS Ha/Hp 235 X 229 (varies) ISS-3 Frank Culbertson M/5 05/15/49 Period 91.6 minutes Down-6 52; STS-38, 51,ISS-3 136.89 Inclination 51.6 degrees ISS-3 Mikhail Tyurin M/1 03/02/60 Velocity 17,212 mph Down-7 40; ISS-3 122.59 EOM Miles 4,467,219 miles ISS-3 CIS Lt.
    [Show full text]
  • Simulating and Evaluating Regolith Propagation Effects During Drilling in Low Gravity Environments
    Advances in Computational Design, Vol. 4, No. 2 (2019) 141-153 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12989/acd.2019.4.2.141 141 Simulating and evaluating regolith propagation effects during drilling in low gravity environments Patrick C. Suermann1, Hriday H. Patel1a and Luke D. Sauter2b 1Department of Construction Science, Texas A&M University Francis Hall 321D, 3137 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-3137 2Department of Astronautical Engineering, United States Air Force Academy, HQ USAFA/DFAS, 2354 Fairchild Dr., USAFA, CO 80840 (Received September 30, 2018, Revised January 11, 2019, Accepted February 13, 2019) Abstract. This research is comprised of virtually simulating behavior while experiencing low gravity effects in advance of real world testing in low gravity aboard Zero Gravity Corporation’s (Zero-G) research aircraft (727- 200F). The experiment simulated a drill rig penetrating a regolith simulant. Regolith is a layer of loose, heterogeneous superficial deposits covering solid rock on surfaces of the Earth’ moon, asteroids and Mars. The behavior and propagation of space debris when drilled in low gravity was tested through simulations and visualization in a leading dynamic simulation software as well as discrete element modeling software and in preparation for comparing to real world results from flying the experiment aboard Zero-G. The study of outer space regolith could lead to deeper scientific knowledge of extra-terrestrial surfaces, which could lead us to breakthroughs with respect to space mining or in-situ resource utilization (ISRU). These studies aimed to test and evaluate the drilling process in low to zero gravity environments and to determine static stress analysis on the drill when tested in low gravity environments.
    [Show full text]
  • Mission Control and Data Systems (MCS) Space Operations and Astronaut Training Portfolio: MCS
    Space Operations and Astronaut Training Portfolio: MCS Mission Control and Data Systems (MCS) Space Operations and Astronaut Training Portfolio: MCS Page 2 2021-01-28_RB_SP_MCS_v01 Space Operations and Astronaut Training Portfolio: MCS 1. Introduction and Overview of MCS Mission Control and Data Systems (MCS) The Mission Control and Data Systems (MCS) Group designs, develops and supports software and software systems. Before a command can be received by the satellite, it is parameterised, tested and transmitted by our software. Telemetry data sent from the satellite is pro- cessed by our software and made available to the engineers. In order to fulfill our mission to provide customers with innova tive These systems consist mainly of software modules, which are and reliable satellite command and data systems, we have developed and maintained by us. The portfolio of the MCS Group excellent experience in advanced systems engineering methods. currently consists of 20 software tools of different complexity and Since the German Space Operations Center (GSOC, 1968) was size. The main tools among others are the following. founded, the MCS Group has built and maintained more than 30 different command and ground control systems for over 20 different satellite types, including geostationary communica­ tions satellites, low­flying Earth observation satellites, scientific Software modules prototypes and for human spaceflight. In order to meet our demand for sustainable, innovative and reliable products and • GECCOS services, our daily work includes looking outside the box at con- • Satmon ferences and other control centers, as well as participating in • ProToS standardization boards. Due to our proximity to the operating • Opsweb engineers and our active participation in the operation, we ensure • MOPS fast response and release times and receive direct feedback from • DORI our customers.
    [Show full text]
  • Sts-45 Press Kit March 1992
    NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION SPACE SHUTTLE MISSION STS-45 PRESS KIT MARCH 1992 ATLAS-1 MISSION Edited by Richard W. Orloff, 01/2000/Page 1 STS-45 INSIGNIA STS045-S-001 -- Designed by the crewmembers, the STS-45 insignia depicts the space shuttle launching from the Kennedy Space Center into a high inclination orbit. From this vantage point, the Atmospheric Laboratory for Applications and Science (ATLAS) payload can view the Earth, the sun, and their dynamic interactions against the background of space. Earth is prominently displayed and is the focus of the mission's space plasma physics and Earth sciences observations. The colors of the setting sun, measured by sensitive instruments, provide detailed information about ozone, carbon dioxide, and other gases which determined Earth's climate and environment. Encircling the scene are the names of the flight crew members. The additional star in the ring is to recognize Charles R. Chappell and Michael Lampton, alternate payload specialists, and the entire ATLAS-1 team for its dedication and support of this "Mission to Planet Earth." The NASA insignia design for space shuttle flights is reserved for use by the astronauts and for other official use as the NASA Administrator may authorize. Public availability has been approved only in the form of illustrations by the various news media. When and if there is any change in this policy, which we do not anticipate, it will be publicly announced. PHOTO CREDIT: NASA or National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Edited by Richard
    [Show full text]