DOCSLIB.ORG

Identified Difficulties and Conditions for Field Success of Biocontrol. 1. Regulatory Aspects

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Identified Difficulties and Conditions for Field Success of Biocontrol. 1. Regulatory Aspects Identified difficulties and conditions for field success of biocontrol. 1. Regulatory aspects Ulf Heilig, Claude Alabouvette, Bernard Blum To cite this version: Ulf Heilig, Claude Alabouvette, Bernard Blum. Identified difficulties and conditions for field success of biocontrol. 1. Regulatory aspects. Classical and augmentative biological control against diseases and pests: critical status analysis and review of factors influencing their success, IOBC - International Organisation for Biological and Integrated Control of Noxious Animals and Plants, 2011, 978-92-9067- 243-2. hal-02804043 HAL Id: hal-02804043 https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02804043 Submitted on 5 Jun 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. WPRS International Organisation for Biological and Integrated Control of Noxious IOBC Animals and Plants: West Palaearctic Regional Section SROP Organisation Internationale de Lutte Biologique et Integrée contre les Animaux et les OILB Plantes Nuisibles: Section Régionale Ouest Paléarctique Classical and augmentative biological control against diseases and pests: critical status analysis and review of factors influencing their success Edited by Philippe C. Nicot 2011 The content of the contributions is the responsibility of the authors Published by the International Organization for Biological and Integrated Control of Noxious Animals and Plants, West Palaearctic Regional Section (IOBC/WPRS) Publié par l'Organisation Internationale de Lutte Biologique et Intégrée contre les Animaux et les Plantes Nuisibles, Section Ouest Palaéarctique (OILB/SROP) Copyright IOBC/WPRS 2011 ISBN 978-92-9067-243-2 2 Cover page photo credits: 1and 3: M Ruocco, CNR 1 4 2: Anderson Mancini 3 4. P.C. Nicot, INRA Preface One of the Research Activities (RA 4.3) of the European Network for Durable Exploitation of crop protection strategies (ENDURE*) has brought together representatives of industry and scientists from several European countries with experience ranging from fundamental biology to applied field work on biological control against pests and diseases. The unique diversity of expertise and concerns allowed the group to set up very complementary approaches to tackle the issue of the factors of success of biocontrol. The initial part of the work accomplished by this group consisted in a thorough review of scientific literature published on all types of biological control. Although it had to be focused on selected key European crops and their major pests and pathogens, this review is unique in the scope of the topics it covered and in the comprehensive inventories it allowed to gather on the potential of biocontrol and factors of success at field level. In parallel with identifying knowledge gaps and key factors from published research, information was gathered on aspects linked to the production and commercialization of biocontrol agents. These results, complemented by the views of experts in the field of biocontrol consulted at the occasion of meetings of IOBC-wprs, allowed the identification of majors gaps in knowledge and bottlenecks for the successful deployment of biocontrol and lead to the proposition of key issues for future work by the research community, the field of development and prospects for technological improvement by industry. Avignon, June 2011 Philippe C. Nicot *EU FR6 project 031499, funded in part by the European Commission i Contributors ALABOUVETTE Claude, INRA, UMR1229, Microbiologie du Sol et de l'Environnement, 17 rue Sully, F-21000 Dijon, France [email protected] current address: AGRENE, 47 rue Constant Pierrot 21000 DIJON, [email protected] BARDIN Marc, INRA, UR 407, Unité de Pathologie végétale, Domaine St Maurice, BP 94, F-84140 Montfavet, France [email protected] BLUM Bernard, International Biocontrol Manufacturers Association, Blauenstrasse 57, CH-4054 Basel, Switzerland [email protected] DELVAL Philippe, ACTA, Direction Scientifique, Technique et Internationale, ICB / VetAgroSup, 1 avenue Claude Bourgelat , F-69680 Marcy l'Etoile, France [email protected] GIORGINI Massimo, CNR, Istituto per la Protezione delle Piante, via Università 133, 80055 Portici (NA), Italy [email protected] HEILIG Ulf, IBMA, 6 rue de Seine, F-78230 Le Pecq, France [email protected] KÖHL Jürgen, Wageningen UR, Plant Research International, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, P.O. Box 69, 6700 AB Wageningen, The Netherlands [email protected] LANZUISE Stefania, UNINA, Dip. Arboricoltura, Botanica e Patologia Vegetale, Università di Napoli Federico II, via Università 100, 80055 Portici (NA), Italy ii LORITO Matteo UNINA, Dip. Arboricoltura, Botanica e Patologia Vegetale, Università di Napoli Federico II, via Università 100, 80055 Portici (NA), Italy [email protected] MALAUSA Jean Claude, INRA, UE 1254, Unité expérimentale de Lutte Biologique, Centre de recherche PACA, 400 route des Chappes, BP 167, F-06903 Sophia Antipolis, France [email protected] NICOT Philippe C., INRA, UR 407, Unité de Pathologie végétale, Domaine St Maurice, BP 94, F-84140 Montfavet, France [email protected] RIS Nicolas, INRA, UE 1254, Unité expérimentale de Lutte Biologique, Centre de recherche PACA, 400 route des Chappes, BP 167, F-06903 Sophia Antipolis, France [email protected] RUOCCO Michelina, CNR, Istituto per la Protezione delle Piante, via Università 133, 80055 Portici (NA), Italy [email protected] VINALE Francesco, CNR, Istituto per la Protezione delle Piante, via Università 133, 80055 Portici (NA), Italy [email protected] WOO Sheridan UNINA, Dip. Arboricoltura, Botanica e Patologia Vegetale, Università di Napoli Federico II, via Università 100, 80055 Portici (NA), Italy [email protected] iii List of Tables Table 1: Scientific papers published between 1973 and 2008 on biological control against major plant diseases (from CAB Abstracts® database). ..........................................2 Table 2: Numbers of references on biocontrol examined per group of disease/plant pathogen......................................................................................................................3 Table 3: Numbers of different biocontrol compounds and microbial species reported as having successful effect against key airborne pathogens/diseases of selected crops. ..........................................................................................................................4 Table 4: Microbial species of fungi/oomycetes, yeasts and bacteria reported to have a significant effect against five main types of airborne diseases or pathogens in laboratory conditions or in the field.................................................................................5 Table 5: References extracted from the CAB Abstracts database and examined for reviewing augmentation biological control in grapevine. .................................................13 Table 6: Biocontrol agents evaluated in researches on augmentative biological control of pests in grapevine. ..................................................................................................15 Table 7: Number of references on augmentative biocontrol agents per group and species of target pest in grapevine.................................................................................16 Table 8: Number of references reporting data on the efficacy of augmentative biocontrol of pests in grapevine. ...................................................................................18 Table 9: Recent introductions of parasitoids as Classical Biocontrol agents ....................................31 Table 10: Consulted sources of information on authorized biocontrol plant protection products in five European countries: .............................................................................34 Table 11: Active substances suitable for biological control listed on Annex I of 91/414/EEC (EU Pesticide Database) - Status on 21st April 2009.....................................36 Table 12: Evidence for, and effectiveness of, induced resistance in plants by Trichoderma species (Harman et al., 2004a). .................................................................47 Table 13: Trichoderma-based preparations commercialized for biological control of plant diseases. ............................................................................................................49 Table 14: Compared structure of the production costs for a microbial biocontrol agent (MBCA) and a chemical insecticide (source IBMA). ......................................................59 Table 15: Compared potential costs of registration for a microbial biocontrol agent (MBCA) and a chemical pesticide (source IBMA)..........................................................60 Table 16: Compared estimated market potential for a microbial biocontrol agent (MBCA) and for a chemical pesticide (source: IBMA) ....................................................60 iv List of Tables (continued) Table 17: Compared margin structure estimates for the production and sales of a microbial biocontrol
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks Bioblitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks BioBlitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event Natural Resource Report NPS/GOGA/NRR—2016/1147 ON THIS PAGE Photograph of BioBlitz participants conducting data entry into iNaturalist. Photograph courtesy of the National Park Service. ON THE COVER Photograph of BioBlitz participants collecting aquatic species data in the Presidio of San Francisco. Photograph courtesy of National Park Service. The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks BioBlitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event Natural Resource Report NPS/GOGA/NRR—2016/1147 Elizabeth Edson1, Michelle O’Herron1, Alison Forrestel2, Daniel George3 1Golden Gate Parks Conservancy Building 201 Fort Mason San Francisco, CA 94129 2National Park Service. Golden Gate National Recreation Area Fort Cronkhite, Bldg. 1061 Sausalito, CA 94965 3National Park Service. San Francisco Bay Area Network Inventory & Monitoring Program Manager Fort Cronkhite, Bldg. 1063 Sausalito, CA 94965 March 2016 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate comprehensive information and analysis about natural resources and related topics concerning lands managed by the National Park Service.
    [Show full text]
  • University of California Santa Cruz Responding to An
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ RESPONDING TO AN EMERGENT PLANT PEST-PATHOGEN COMPLEX ACROSS SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SCALES A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES with an emphasis in ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY by Shannon Colleen Lynch December 2020 The Dissertation of Shannon Colleen Lynch is approved: Professor Gregory S. Gilbert, chair Professor Stacy M. Philpott Professor Andrew Szasz Professor Ingrid M. Parker Quentin Williams Acting Vice Provost and Dean of Graduate Studies Copyright © by Shannon Colleen Lynch 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables iv List of Figures vii Abstract x Dedication xiii Acknowledgements xiv Chapter 1 – Introduction 1 References 10 Chapter 2 – Host Evolutionary Relationships Explain 12 Tree Mortality Caused by a Generalist Pest– Pathogen Complex References 38 Chapter 3 – Microbiome Variation Across a 66 Phylogeographic Range of Tree Hosts Affected by an Emergent Pest–Pathogen Complex References 110 Chapter 4 – On Collaborative Governance: Building Consensus on 180 Priorities to Manage Invasive Species Through Collective Action References 243 iii LIST OF TABLES Chapter 2 Table I Insect vectors and corresponding fungal pathogens causing 47 Fusarium dieback on tree hosts in California, Israel, and South Africa. Table II Phylogenetic signal for each host type measured by D statistic. 48 Table SI Native range and infested distribution of tree and shrub FD- 49 ISHB host species. Chapter 3 Table I Study site attributes. 124 Table II Mean and median richness of microbiota in wood samples 128 collected from FD-ISHB host trees. Table III Fungal endophyte-Fusarium in vitro interaction outcomes.
    [Show full text]
  • Maine Coefficient of Conservatism
    Coefficient of Coefficient of Scientific Name Common Name Nativity Conservatism Wetness Abies balsamea balsam fir native 3 0 Abies concolor white fir non‐native 0 Abutilon theophrasti velvetleaf non‐native 0 3 Acalypha rhomboidea common threeseed mercury native 2 3 Acer ginnala Amur maple non‐native 0 Acer negundo boxelder non‐native 0 0 Acer pensylvanicum striped maple native 5 3 Acer platanoides Norway maple non‐native 0 5 Acer pseudoplatanus sycamore maple non‐native 0 Acer rubrum red maple native 2 0 Acer saccharinum silver maple native 6 ‐3 Acer saccharum sugar maple native 5 3 Acer spicatum mountain maple native 6 3 Acer x freemanii red maple x silver maple native 2 0 Achillea millefolium common yarrow non‐native 0 3 Achillea millefolium var. borealis common yarrow non‐native 0 3 Achillea millefolium var. millefolium common yarrow non‐native 0 3 Achillea millefolium var. occidentalis common yarrow non‐native 0 3 Achillea ptarmica sneezeweed non‐native 0 3 Acinos arvensis basil thyme non‐native 0 Aconitum napellus Venus' chariot non‐native 0 Acorus americanus sweetflag native 6 ‐5 Acorus calamus calamus native 6 ‐5 Actaea pachypoda white baneberry native 7 5 Actaea racemosa black baneberry non‐native 0 Actaea rubra red baneberry native 7 3 Actinidia arguta tara vine non‐native 0 Adiantum aleuticum Aleutian maidenhair native 9 3 Adiantum pedatum northern maidenhair native 8 3 Adlumia fungosa allegheny vine native 7 Aegopodium podagraria bishop's goutweed non‐native 0 0 Coefficient of Coefficient of Scientific Name Common Name Nativity
    [Show full text]
  • Polygonaceae of Alberta
    AN ILLUSTRATED KEY TO THE POLYGONACEAE OF ALBERTA Compiled and writen by Lorna Allen & Linda Kershaw April 2019 © Linda J. Kershaw & Lorna Allen This key was compiled using informaton primarily from Moss (1983), Douglas et. al. (1999) and the Flora North America Associaton (2005). Taxonomy follows VAS- CAN (Brouillet, 2015). The main references are listed at the end of the key. Please let us know if there are ways in which the kay can be improved. The 2015 S-ranks of rare species (S1; S1S2; S2; S2S3; SU, according to ACIMS, 2015) are noted in superscript (S1;S2;SU) afer the species names. For more details go to the ACIMS web site. Similarly, exotc species are followed by a superscript X, XX if noxious and XXX if prohibited noxious (X; XX; XXX) according to the Alberta Weed Control Act (2016). POLYGONACEAE Buckwheat Family 1a Key to Genera 01a Dwarf annual plants 1-4(10) cm tall; leaves paired or nearly so; tepals 3(4); stamens (1)3(5) .............Koenigia islandica S2 01b Plants not as above; tepals 4-5; stamens 3-8 ..................................02 02a Plants large, exotic, perennial herbs spreading by creeping rootstocks; fowering stems erect, hollow, 0.5-2(3) m tall; fowers with both ♂ and ♀ parts ............................03 02b Plants smaller, native or exotic, perennial or annual herbs, with or without creeping rootstocks; fowering stems usually <1 m tall; fowers either ♂ or ♀ (unisexual) or with both ♂ and ♀ parts .......................04 3a 03a Flowering stems forming dense colonies and with distinct joints (like bamboo
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Plants Rated by Deer Resistance
    E271 Bulletin For a comprehensive list of our publications visit www.rce.rutgers.edu Landscape Plants Rated by Deer Resistance Pedro Perdomo, Morris County Agricultural Agent Peter Nitzsche, Morris County Agricultural Agent David Drake, Ph.D., Extension Specialist in Wildlife Management The following is a list of landscape plants rated according to their resistance to deer damage. The list was compiled with input from nursery and landscape professionals, Cooperative Extension personnel, and Master Gardeners in Northern N.J. Realizing that no plant is deer proof, plants in the Rarely Damaged, and Seldom Rarely Damaged categories would be best for landscapes prone to deer damage. Plants Occasionally Severely Damaged and Frequently Severely Damaged are often preferred by deer and should only be planted with additional protection such as the use of fencing, repellents, etc. Success of any of these plants in the landscape will depend on local deer populations and weather conditions. Latin Name Common Name Latin Name Common Name ANNUALS Petroselinum crispum Parsley Salvia Salvia Rarely Damaged Tagetes patula French Marigold Ageratum houstonianum Ageratum Tropaeolum majus Nasturtium Antirrhinum majus Snapdragon Verbena x hybrida Verbena Brugmansia sp. (Datura) Angel’s Trumpet Zinnia sp. Zinnia Calendula sp. Pot Marigold Catharanthus rosea Annual Vinca Occasionally Severely Damaged Centaurea cineraria Dusty Miller Begonia semperflorens Wax Begonia Cleome sp. Spider Flower Coleus sp. Coleus Consolida ambigua Larkspur Cosmos sp. Cosmos Euphorbia marginata Snow-on-the-Mountain Dahlia sp. Dahlia Helichrysum Strawflower Gerbera jamesonii Gerbera Daisy Heliotropium arborescens Heliotrope Helianthus sp. Sunflower Lobularia maritima Sweet Alyssum Impatiens balsamina Balsam, Touch-Me-Not Matricaria sp. False Camomile Impatiens walleriana Impatiens Myosotis sylvatica Forget-Me-Not Ipomea sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Now Is the Time to Plant Rhubarb by Susan Pelton, Uconn Home & Garden Education Center
    Now is the Time to Plant Rhubarb By Susan Pelton, UConn Home & Garden Education Center Rhubarb is an herbaceous, cool-weather perennial vegetable that grows from short, thick rhizomes. It produces large, triangular-shaped leaves, edible stalks and small flowers. Although it is classified as a vegetable since seed- bearing fruit is not consumed, the red-green stalks, which are similar to celery in texture, have a tart taste and are used like a fruit in pies, preserves, and sauces. Rhubarb root has been used medicinally for thousands of years starting in China and then spreading to the Middle East and Europe by way of the Silk Road by merchants that included Marco Polo, among others. Chinese rhubarb root was highly valued by apothecaries for its laxative properties and its cost often outweighed other spices. In fact, the high cost inspired Europeans to attempt to cultivate the plant in the early 1600s. They were successful in replicating the medicinal properties but those cultivars, Rheum palmatum, R. tanguticum, and R. officinale but the variety known as Russian or Siberian rhubarb became the predecessor of modern rhubarb. Rheum rhabarbarum and the variety R. x hybridum are the rhubarbs that have been domesticated for food production. It was in the 1700s that one of the biggest changes to the culinary use of rhubarb came about due to the increase of the availability of sugar to the everyday person. It was the addition of sugar that took rhubarb out of the categories of medicine and savory dishes and put this vegetable into the realm of desserts and preserves.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Bioprospection of Fungal Community Present in Oligotrophic Soil of Continental Antarctica
    Extremophiles (2015) 19:585–596 DOI 10.1007/s00792-015-0741-6 ORIGINAL PAPER Diversity and bioprospection of fungal community present in oligotrophic soil of continental Antarctica Valéria M. Godinho · Vívian N. Gonçalves · Iara F. Santiago · Hebert M. Figueredo · Gislaine A. Vitoreli · Carlos E. G. R. Schaefer · Emerson C. Barbosa · Jaquelline G. Oliveira · Tânia M. A. Alves · Carlos L. Zani · Policarpo A. S. Junior · Silvane M. F. Murta · Alvaro J. Romanha · Erna Geessien Kroon · Charles L. Cantrell · David E. Wedge · Stephen O. Duke · Abbas Ali · Carlos A. Rosa · Luiz H. Rosa Received: 20 November 2014 / Accepted: 16 February 2015 / Published online: 26 March 2015 © Springer Japan 2015 Abstract We surveyed the diversity and capability of understanding eukaryotic survival in cold-arid oligotrophic producing bioactive compounds from a cultivable fungal soils. We hypothesize that detailed further investigations community isolated from oligotrophic soil of continen- may provide a greater understanding of the evolution of tal Antarctica. A total of 115 fungal isolates were obtained Antarctic fungi and their relationships with other organisms and identified in 11 taxa of Aspergillus, Debaryomyces, described in that region. Additionally, different wild pristine Cladosporium, Pseudogymnoascus, Penicillium and Hypo- bioactive fungal isolates found in continental Antarctic soil creales. The fungal community showed low diversity and may represent a unique source to discover prototype mol- richness, and high dominance indices. The extracts of ecules for use in drug and biopesticide discovery studies. Aspergillus sydowii, Penicillium allii-sativi, Penicillium brevicompactum, Penicillium chrysogenum and Penicil- Keywords Antarctica · Drug discovery · Ecology · lium rubens possess antiviral, antibacterial, antifungal, Fungi · Taxonomy antitumoral, herbicidal and antiprotozoal activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Gardenergardener®
    Theh American A n GARDENERGARDENER® The Magazine of the AAmerican Horticultural Societyy January / February 2016 New Plants for 2016 Broadleaved Evergreens for Small Gardens The Dwarf Tomato Project Grow Your Own Gourmet Mushrooms contents Volume 95, Number 1 . January / February 2016 FEATURES DEPARTMENTS 5 NOTES FROM RIVER FARM 6 MEMBERS’ FORUM 8 NEWS FROM THE AHS 2016 Seed Exchange catalog now available, upcoming travel destinations, registration open for America in Bloom beautifi cation contest, 70th annual Colonial Williamsburg Garden Symposium in April. 11 AHS MEMBERS MAKING A DIFFERENCE Dale Sievert. 40 HOMEGROWN HARVEST Love those leeks! page 400 42 GARDEN SOLUTIONS Understanding mycorrhizal fungi. BOOK REVIEWS page 18 44 The Seed Garden and Rescuing Eden. Special focus: Wild 12 NEW PLANTS FOR 2016 BY CHARLOTTE GERMANE gardening. From annuals and perennials to shrubs, vines, and vegetables, see which of this year’s introductions are worth trying in your garden. 46 GARDENER’S NOTEBOOK Link discovered between soil fungi and monarch 18 THE DWARF TOMATO PROJECT BY CRAIG LEHOULLIER butterfl y health, stinky A worldwide collaborative breeds diminutive plants that produce seeds trick dung beetles into dispersal role, regular-size, fl avorful tomatoes. Mt. Cuba tickseed trial results, researchers unravel how plants can survive extreme drought, grant for nascent public garden in 24 BEST SMALL BROADLEAVED EVERGREENS Delaware, Lady Bird Johnson Wildfl ower BY ANDREW BUNTING Center selects new president and CEO. These small to mid-size selections make a big impact in modest landscapes. 50 GREEN GARAGE Seed-starting products. 30 WEESIE SMITH BY ALLEN BUSH 52 TRAVELER’S GUIDE TO GARDENS Alabama gardener Weesie Smith championed pagepage 3030 Quarryhill Botanical Garden, California.
    [Show full text]
  • Entomopathogenic Fungi Associated with Certain Scale Insects (Hemiptera: Coccoidea) in Egypt
    Egypt. Acad. J. Biolog. Sci., 5(3): 211 -221 (2012) (Review Article) A. Entomology Email: [email protected] ISSN: 1687–8809 Received: 15/ 5 /2012 www.eajbs.eg.net Entomopathogenic fungi associated with certain scale insects (Hemiptera: Coccoidea) in Egypt Ezz, N. A. Plant Protection Research Institute, Agriculture Research Center, Dokki, Giza, Egypt ABSTRACT Scale insects (Hemiptera: Coccoidea) are economically important pests in Egypt. Entomopathogenic fungi are considering principal pathogens among piercing sucking insects including scales. Very little attention was paid to the potential of fungal pathogens for scales in Egypt. In the following compilation, data on the record of fungal pathogen of the scale insects in Egypt, their host insects, host plants, locality distribution and identify are summarized. Assess of these entomopathogens in biocontrol experiments against scales and practical application under laboratory, field conditions and commercials utilization are also included. The aim of this review is to overview on the pathogenic fungal-scales relationships in Egypt. Keywords: Entomopathogenic, scale insects, Egypt INTRODUCTION Scale insects (Hemiptera: Coccoidea) are notorious pests, on perennial plants; as well as ornamentals and crops (Williams and Watson1988). Scale insects comprising 140 valid species names in 12 families in Egypt (Abd-Rabou, 2012). They are plant- sap feeding insects belong to Hemiptera closely related to the aphids, whiteflies and leaf hopper (Cook et al., 2002). Scales cause damage by sucking plant fluids from leaves, stems and sometimes roots. Some species feed on the underside of leaves, which can appear as stippling or chlorotic lesions. Heavily infested plants look unhealthy and produce little new growth and can cause extensive leaf yellowing, premature leaf drop (defoliation), branch dieback and plant death (Kosztarab, 1990).
    [Show full text]
  • Rôles Fonctionnels Des Haies Dans La Régulation Des Ravageurs : Le Cas Du Psylle Cacopsylla Pyri L
    Rôles fonctionnels des haies dans la régulation des ravageurs : le cas du psylle Cacopsylla pyri L. dans les vergers du sud-est de la France Jean Francois Debras To cite this version: Jean Francois Debras. Rôles fonctionnels des haies dans la régulation des ravageurs : le cas du psylle Cacopsylla pyri L. dans les vergers du sud-est de la France. Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]. Université d’Avignon et des Pays de Vaucluse, 2007. Français. tel-02823944 HAL Id: tel-02823944 https://hal.inrae.fr/tel-02823944 Submitted on 6 Jun 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Numéro : THESE Présentée devant L’UNIVERSITE D ’AVIGNON PAYS DE VAUCLUSE Pour obtenir le grade de : Docteur del’Universitéd’Avignon et des Pays deVaucluse Mention : SCIENCES DE LA VIE par Jean-François DEBRAS Rôles fonctionnels des haies dans la régulation des ravageurs : le cas du psylle Cacopsylla pyri L. dans les vergers du sud-est de la France Soutenue le 25 Septembre 2007 Jury : Directeur : Pr. Thierry Dutoit, Professeur, Université d’Avignon, IUT. Co-directeur : Dr. René Rieux, Chargé de Recherche, INRA Avignon Rapporteurs : Pr.
    [Show full text]
  • Beiträge Zur Bayerischen Entomofaunistik 13: 67–207
    Beiträge zur bayerischen Entomofaunistik 13:67–207, Bamberg (2014), ISSN 1430-015X Grundlegende Untersuchungen zur vielfältigen Insektenfauna im Tiergarten Nürnberg unter besonderer Betonung der Hymenoptera Auswertung von Malaisefallenfängen in den Jahren 1989 und 1990 von Klaus von der Dunk & Manfred Kraus Inhaltsverzeichnis 1. Einleitung 68 2. Untersuchungsgebiet 68 3. Methodik 69 3.1. Planung 69 3.2. Malaisefallen (MF) im Tiergarten 1989, mit Gelbschalen (GS) und Handfänge 69 3.3. Beschreibung der Fallenstandorte 70 3.4. Malaisefallen, Gelbschalen und Handfänge 1990 71 4. Darstellung der Untersuchungsergebnisse 71 4.1. Die Tabellen 71 4.2. Umfang der Untersuchungen 73 4.3. Grenzen der Interpretation von Fallenfängen 73 5. Untersuchungsergebnisse 74 5.1. Hymenoptera 74 5.1.1. Hymenoptera – Symphyta (Blattwespen) 74 5.1.1.1. Tabelle Symphyta 74 5.1.1.2. Tabellen Leerungstermine der Malaisefallen und Gelbschalen und Blattwespenanzahl 78 5.1.1.3. Symphyta 79 5.1.2. Hymenoptera – Terebrantia 87 5.1.2.1. Tabelle Terebrantia 87 5.1.2.2. Tabelle Ichneumonidae (det. R. Bauer) mit Ergänzungen 91 5.1.2.3. Terebrantia: Evanoidea bis Chalcididae – Ichneumonidae – Braconidae 100 5.1.2.4. Bauer, R.: Ichneumoniden aus den Fängen in Malaisefallen von Dr. M. Kraus im Tiergarten Nürnberg in den Jahren 1989 und 1990 111 5.1.3. Hymenoptera – Apocrita – Aculeata 117 5.1.3.1. Tabellen: Apidae, Formicidae, Chrysididae, Pompilidae, Vespidae, Sphecidae, Mutillidae, Sapygidae, Tiphiidae 117 5.1.3.2. Apidae, Formicidae, Chrysididae, Pompilidae, Vespidae, Sphecidae, Mutillidae, Sapygidae, Tiphiidae 122 5.1.4. Coleoptera 131 5.1.4.1. Tabelle Coleoptera 131 5.1.4.2.
    [Show full text]
  • New Data on the Brown Lacewings from Asia (Neuroptera: Hemerobiidae)
    Journal of Neuropterology 3: 61-97, 2000 (2001) New data on the Brown Lacewings from Asia (Neuroptera: Hemerobiidae) V. J. Monserrat Departamento de Biologia Animal I, Facultad de Biologia Universidad Complutense, E-28040 Madrid, Spain E-mail: [email protected] Key Words: Faunistical, Taxonomy, Systematics, Neuroptera, Hemerobiidae, Palaearctic, Oriental Regions. SUMMARY New data on the taxonomy, morphology, distribution or biology of 58 hardly known brown lacewing species from Asia are given. some new synonymies have been proposed as follow: Hemerobius harmandinus NavBs,1910 = (Hemerobius divisus NavBs,1931 n. syn. = Hemerobius lacunaris NavBs,1936 n. syn.), Hemerobius japonicus Nakahara,l915 = (Henzerobiusferox Tjeder,1936 n. syn.), Hemerobius poppii Esben-Petersen,1921 = (Heinerobius tunkunensis Navhs, 1933 n. syn. = Hemerobius xizangensis Yang,1981 n. syn.), Hemerobius tolimensis Banks, 19 10 = (Hemerobius sumatranus NavBs,1926 n. syn.), Hemerobius bispinus Banks,1940 = (Hemerobius montanus Kirnmis,l960 n. syn.), Hemerobius ckiangi Banks,1940 = (Hemerobius mangkamaizus Yang,I 981 n. syn.), Wesnzaelius navasi (Andreu,191 1) = (Wesm~eliusneimenica (Yang,1980) n. syn.), Wesmaelius vaillanti (NavBs,1927) = (Wesmaelius mongolicus (Steinmann,l965)n. syn.), Wesmaelius baikalensis (NavBs,1929) = (Wesnzaelius pseudofurcatus Makarkin,l986 n. syn.), Wesmaelius quettanus (NavBs,193 1) = (Wesmaelius sinicus (Tjeder,1937) n. syn. = Wesmaelius amseli (Aspock & Aspock, 1966) n. syn.), Sympherobius tessellatus Nakahara,l915 = (Sympherobius nzatsucocciphagus Yang,l980 n. syn. = Sympherobius weisong Yang,1980 11. syn. = Sympherobius l~iojiaensisYang,1980 n. syn.), Neuronema albostigma (Matsumura,l907) = (Neuronema nepalensis Nahakara,l971 n. syn. = Sineuronema gyirongana Yang,1981 n. syn.), Neuronema pielina (NavBs,1936) = (Neuronema kwanshiensis Kimmins, 1943 n. syn. = Neuronema tienrnuslzana Yang,1964 iz. syn. = Neuronema chungnanshana Yang,1964 n.
    [Show full text]