DOCSLIB.ORG

Seattle's Freeway Revolt

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Seattle's Freeway Revolt SEATTLE’S FREEWAY REVOLT: A DIRECTORY OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES 1 This project was supported by a Heritage Program Grant from 4Culture/King County Lodging Tax Fund. Seattle ARCH is an Associated Program of ShunpiKe Acknowledgements This directory was initiated by Seattle ARCH (Activists Remembered, Celebrated and Honored), na ad hoc group dedicated to preserving and sharing the history of Seattle’s Freeway Revolt. Generous financial support from a 4Culture Heritage Program Grant/King County Lodging Tax Fund made it possible to hire two research archivists, Libby Hopfauf and Arielle Lavigne, who culled much of the information presented herein. We are grateful for th eir expertise and dedication. We wish to extend our thanks to other individuals who made significant contributions to this project. Anne Frantilla, City Archivist, and Ann Ferguson, Curator of the Seattle Collection, Seattle Public Library, provided consultation and guidance from the project’s inception through final review. Jod Fenton, SPL Special Collections managing librarian, was instrumental in formulating the overarching vision for this directory. Jennifer Ott, environmental historian, HistoryLink, provided valuable perspective and insights as an ee external reviewer. Archivists at the Washington State Archives, in particular Jewell Dunn, were extraordinarily helpful in facilitating on-site research. Additional assistance was provided by Virginia Wright, Executive Director, Rainier Valley Historical Society; Caroline Marr, librarian, MOHAI Resource Center; Lorraine McConaghy, public historian; author David Williams; and staff at the University of Washington Special Collections. We also wish to express our appreciation to King County Councilmember Larry Gossett for his endorsement of this project; to Frank Chopp, Speaker, Washington State House of Representatives, for his ongoing support of efforts to preserve this history; and to our Fiscal Sponsor, Shunpike, for providing essential administrative services. Priscilla Arsove and Anna Rudd Co-founders, Seattle ARCH October 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Historical Overview 1. Navigating the Directory 2. Key Resources 3. Additional Publications 4. Key Planning Reports 5. Newspaper and Periodical Articles 6. Primary Resources 7. Seattle Municipal Archives Washington State Archives Puget Sound Regional Archives University of Washington Libraries, Special Collections Washington State Department of Transportation Library Rainier Valley Historical Society Narrative TimelineMuseum of History and Industry 8. Organizations Involved in Freeway Revolt 9. Cover image: Comprehensive Plan of Seattle. Seattle Public Library, SEADOC P6.7, September 1956. 1. HISTORICAL OVERVIEW Seattle’s Freeway Revolt: A Citizen Movement that Shaped Seattle In the late 1960s and 1970s, a broad coalition of activists in Seattle challenged plans for a dense network of freeways traversing and girdling the city. Seattle’s freeway revolt was remarkable in its scope and diversity, uniting geographically, ethnically and socio- economically diverse groups across the city. Their collective actions over a multi-year period succeeded in halting two major freeways and significantly downsizing a third, saving parks, shoreline and thousands of homes and businesses. Proposed I-90/ R.H. Thomson Interchange1 Proposed R.H. Thomson Interchange at Evergreen Point Bridge2 It is difficult to imagine what Seattle might look like today had the citizens of that era not prevailed. ● The R.H. Thomson Expressway, roughly a mile from Interstate 5, would have cut a 15- mile swath from the Duwamish neighborhood in the south to Bothell in the north. As many as 3,000 homes would have been destroyed and up to 8,000 people displaced. ● The Bay Freeway, envisioned as a link between Interstate 5 (I-5) and the Seattle Center, would have created a giant viaduct walling off South Lake Union from the rest of the city. ● An expansive new I-90 Mercer Island bridge, adding 10 lanes to the existing 4-lane bridge (U.S. 10), would have connected to the R.H. Thomson via a massive interchange and cut an open trench through Mount Baker Ridge. Much of the surrounding community would have been obliterated. The above projects were rooted in transportation plans of the late 1950s and early 60s, but it was not until construction of I-5, initiated over this same timeframe, that Seattle residents witnessed the destructive impact of freeways on neighborhoods and homes. Subsequent “slumlording” of state highway department-owned homes in the R.H. Thomson and I-90 corridors was a galvanizing force in the freeway revolt. 1 [Article onHoward, Needles, plans fo Tammenr future RH & Bergendoff, Thomson Expressway], and Washington Argus, Department June 2, 1961 of . Highways. Design Report 1, Primary State Highway No. 2, 2Sign Route 90, Corwin Place to East Channel Bridge. Seattle, 1966. 1 Opposition to the R.H. Thomson, I-90 and the Bay Freeway overlapped over a roughly four- year period from 1968-72, the height of Seattle’s freeway revolt. The Bay Freeway and R.H. Thomson were defeated in 1972 referendums, but the anti-freeway movement continued through much of the decade with protracted legal battles, hearings, initiative drives and negotiations over I-90. 3 The freeway revolt was part of a unique period of activism and social change in Seattle, from the anti-war, environmental and Black Power movements to transformation of the Seattle City Council with a “new wave” of political leaders. The well-known “Save the Pike Place Market” initiative passed at the ballot only a few months before voters defeated the R.H. Thomson and Bay Freeways; leaders of the two movements were collaborators and colleagues. Organizations such as the Seattle Model Cities program, Central Seattle Community Council Federation, Choose an Effective City Council and the Forward Thrust campaign came into being around this time and intersected with the freeway revolt around issues of community empowerment, civic leadership and mass transit. A brief timeline highlighting milestone events over more than three decades is provided on the following page. 3 The above images depict materials from the “Seattle Freeway Revolt Collection” (see University of Washington Libraries, Special Collections). 2 TIMELINE OF KEY EVENTS 1960 Voters approve Bay Freeway, RH Thomson bonds City holds first RH Thomson hearing 1961 1962 RH Thomson corridor residents sue city State holds first I-90 hearing; 1963 Evergreen Point Bridge opens 1966 News stories depicting huge I-90/RH Thomson interchange stir public response City holds first Bay Freeway hearing; 1967 Seattle Freeway (I-5) opens 1968 Citizens Against the RH Thomson and Citizens Against Freeways form Citizens dispute RH Thomson funding; 1969 hold rallies to Save the Arboretum and Save Mt. Baker Ridge 1970 Citizens flood city, state I-90 hearings; file lawsuit challenging I-90 Citizen lawsuit sends Bay Freeway 1971 back to voters; Appeals Court halts I-90 construction Vote No Bay Freeway Committee forms; 1972 voters scrap Bay, RH Thomson Circuit Court orders new I-90 1973 EIS and hearings 1976 State holds new I-90 hearings State issues final EIS for scaled-back I-90 with capacity 1977 for future rapid transit Court lifts injunction; 1979 I-90 construction resumes 3 2. NAVIGATING THE DIRECTORY This directory will guide the user to a wide array of historical resources relating to Seattle’s freeway revolt. It is a searchable directory with hyperlinks (in blue) to outside sources, as well as to other sections/resources within the document (in green). Print copies of this directory are available at select local libraries. A digital copy of the directory is hosted on the Seattle Public Library’s website. Sections of the directory are briefly described below. Key Resources: This section comprises an annotated bibliography highlighting publications focused on freeway revolts in Seattle and beyond, as well as the public policy trends that shaped them. Most were written at the time of, or soon after, Seattle’s freeway revolt; some reflect activists’ own accounts of their involvement. Together these resources provide a good overview of what transpired. Additional Publications: This section comprises a bibliography with additional publications of interest. Key Planning Reports: Reports relating to transportation planning for the greater Seattle area ‒ including plans proposing an extensive freeway network ‒ are listed here. Significant legislation at the national level is also noted. Newspaper and Periodical Articles: Relevant media articles with source citations are listed in chronological order. Local newspapers and periodicals, abundant in the era of Seattle’s freeway revolt, provide a rich chronicle of the actions of citizen activists and the origin and evolution of proposed freeway plans. Primary Resources: This section describes materials available within archive collections, including original source documents, photographs, audio recordings, film and video recordings, and maps. Since the contested freeways in Seattle were largely funded and planned by the City of Seattle and State of Washington, the Seattle Municipal Archives and Washington State Archives provide a wealth of relevant information. Archival materials are sorted by the repository (archive, museum, or historical society) in which they are housed. Information provided for each repository includes a descriptive overview; tools and tips for navigating online and physical resources; list of related collections; and contextual information such as a date range,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SDOT 2018 Traffic Report
    Seattle Department of Transportation 2018 TRAFFIC REPORT *2017 data CONTENTS 5 Executive Summary 7 Traffic Volumes and Speeds 8 Motor Vehicle Volumes 11 Traffic Flow Map 13 Bicycle Volumes 18 Pedestrian Volumes 21 Motor Vehicle Speeds 23 Traffic Collisions 24 Citywide Collision Rate 25 Fatal and Serious Injury Collisions 27 Pedestrian Collision Rate 30 Bicycle Collision Rate 33 Supporting Data 33 Volume Data 44 Speed Data 48 Historical Collision Data 50 2016 All Collisions 54 2016 Pedestrian Collisions 63 2016 Bicycle Collisions 75 Glossary EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report presents an end of year review of This report is prepared in compliance with Seattle the core data sets the Seattle Department of Municipal Code 11.16.220, which requires the Transportation (SDOT) collects and maintains City Traffic Engineer to present an annual traffic including volumes, speeds, and collisions. The report that includes information about traffic use of this data, guided by department plans and trends and traffic collisions on City of Seattle policies, serves as the foundation for making streets. Beyond this legal requirement, the informed decisions on nearly all work at SDOT report strives to serve as an accessible reference from safety improvements to repaving to grant of Seattle traffic data and trends for all. applications. It is fundamental to measuring project performance. The breadth and depth of In gathering and compiling the information the data collected allows objective discussion of in this report, the Seattle Department of project merits and results, be it a new crosswalk Transportation does not waive the limitations on or an entire safety corridor. As the demands and this information’s discoverability or admissibility complexity of Seattle’s transportation network under 23 U.S.C § 409.
    [Show full text]
  • Redefining Urban Food Systems to Identify Optimal Rooftop Community Garden Locations
    REDEFINING URBAN FOOD SYSTEMS TO IDENTIFY OPTIMAL ROOFTOP COMMUNITY GARDEN LOCATIONS: A SITE SUITABILITY ANALYSIS IN SEATTLE, WASHINGTON by Ana E. Stoudt A Thesis Presented to the FACULTY OF THE USC GRADUATE SCHOOL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF SCIENCE (GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY) May 2015 Copyright 2015 Ana E. Stoudt i DEDICATION I dedicate this paper to my parents, friends, and coworkers for their constant support throughout this entire process. Without them, I would not have made it here today. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am forever grateful to my advisor, Professor Warshawsky, for his encouragement and guidance throughout this experience. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS DEDICATION ................................................................................................................................ ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................................................................. iii LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................ vii LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................... viii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................................................... x ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of the 50-Year Rule, 1966-2010
    Copyright by Emily Jeanne Koller 2011 The Report Committee for Emily Jeanne Koller Certifies that this is the approved version of the following report: Listed, Obliterated or Status Unknown: An Analysis of the 50-Year Rule, 1966-2010 APPROVED BY SUPERVISING COMMITTEE: Supervisor: Michael Holleran Monica Penick Listed, Obliterated or Status Unknown: An Analysis of the 50-Year Rule, 1966-2010 by Emily Jeanne Koller, B.A.; MA Report Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Community and Regional Planning The University of Texas at Austin May 2011 Abstract Listed, Obliterated or Status Unknown: An Analysis of the 50-Year Rule, 1966-2010 Emily Jeanne Koller, MSCRP The University of Texas at Austin, 2011 Supervisor: Michael Holleran The report evolves from previous work in the field that questions the efficacy of the 50-year rule, or criterion consideration G, of the National Register of Historic Places program to register and protect modern and recent past resources. Proponents of the recent past argue that by restricting evaluation of historic architecture to only that which is 50-years or older is leading to widespread endangerment and demolition of buildings and sites with periods of significance from the postwar era. This report studies the use of criterion G in-depth since the inception of the National Register program and attempts to identify and quantify the resources lost through continued adherence to the 50-year rule. The analysis is done in two parts.
    [Show full text]
  • MIKE SIEGEL / the SEATTLE TIMES South Lake Union 1882
    Photo credit: MIKE SIEGEL / THE SEATTLE TIMES South Lake Union 1882 http://pauldorpat.com/seattle-now-and-then/seattle-now-then/ Westlake 1902 Top, Westlake 2013 The Club Stables earlier home on Western Ave. north of Lenora Street: Photo Credit MOHAI Reported in the Seattle Times Sept. 26, 1909, read the headline, "Club Stables Now In Finest Quarters in West." Article describes the scene "in the very heart of the city . These up-to-date stables contain ample accommodations for 250 horses, with every safeguard and comfort in the way of ventilation, cleanliness etc. that modern sanitary science can provide . An elaborate sprinkler system of the most approved and efficient type . is practically an absolute guarantee against serious damage by fire. The management solicits an inspection at any time." Development Western Mill, early 1890s, at the south end of Lake Union and the principal employer for the greater Cascade neighborhood Development accelerated after David Denny built the Western Mill in 1882, near the site of today’s Naval Reserve Center, and cut a barrier at Montlake to float logs between the lakes. Homes soon began to appear on the Lake Union’s south shore, ranging from the ornate Queen Anne-style mansion built by Margaret Pontius in 1889 (which served as the “Mother Ryther Home” for orphans from 1905 to 1920) to humble worker's cottages. The latter housed a growing number of immigrants from Scandinavia, Greece, Russia, and America’s own teeming East, attracted by jobs in Seattle’s burgeoning mills and on its bustling docks. Beginning in 1894, their children attended Cascade School -- which finally gave the neighborhood a name -- and families worshipped on Sundays at St.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Cemetery Resources
    HISTORIC CEMETERY RESOURCES Technical Paper No. 11 Historic Preservation Program, Department of Natural Resources & Parks, 20l S. Jackson Street, Suite 700, Seattle, WA 98104, 206-477-4538 | TTY Relay: 711 Introduction Cemeteries and funerary objects are often of value beyond their traditional role as personal and family memorials or religious sacramentals. They may be historically significant as landmarks, designed landscapes or as repositories of historical information relating to communities, ethnic heritage and other heritage topics. The following resources have been compiled for individuals and organizations interested in cemetery records, research and preservation. Records & Research Area genealogical societies, museums, historical societies, pioneer associations, libraries and hereditary associations often have records and publications of interest. Among the organizations with information on cemeteries are: Seattle Genealogical Society, P.O. Box 15329, Seattle WA 98115-0329 South King County Genealogical Society, P.O. Box 3174, Kent, WA 98089-0203 Eastside Genealogical Society. P.O. Box 374, Bellevue, WA 98009-0374 Seattle Public Library, 1000 Fourth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104-1109 Pioneer Association of the State of Washington, 1642 43rd Avenue E., Seattle, WA 98112 Fiske Genealogical Foundation, 1644 43rd Avenue E., Seattle, WA 98112-3222 Many historical societies and museum groups around King County have been instrumental in preserving and maintaining cemeteries. The Association of King County Historical Organizations (www.akcho.org) maintains a directory of area historical museums and organizations. A directory of historical organizations can also be found on the internet at www.historylink.org A number of churches and religious organizations own and operate cemeteries and maintain records of value to cemetery research.
    [Show full text]
  • SR 520, I-5 to Medina: Bridge Replacement and HOV Project Area Encompasses One of the Most Diverse and Complex Human and Natural Landscapes in the Puget Sound Region
    Chapter 4: The Project Area’s Environment Chapter 4: The Project Area’s Environment The SR 520, I-5 to Medina: Bridge Replacement and HOV Project area encompasses one of the most diverse and complex human and natural landscapes in the Puget Sound region. It includes areas in Seattle from I-5 to the Lake Washington shore, the waters of Lake Washington, and a portion of the Eastside communities and neighborhoods from the eastern shoreline of the lake to Evergreen Point Road. It also includes densely developed urban and suburban areas and some of the most critical natural areas and sensitive ecosystems that remain in the urban growth area. The project area includes the following: ▪ Seattle neighborhoods—Eastlake, Portage Bay/Roanoke, North Capitol Hill, Montlake, University District, Laurelhurst, and Madison Park ▪ The Lake Washington ecosystem and the bays, streams, and wetlands that are associated with it ▪ The Eastside community of Medina ▪ Usual and accustomed fishing areas of the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe, who have historically used the area’s fisheries resources and has treaty rights for their protection and use This chapter describes what the project area is like today, setting the stage for the project’s effects described in Chapters 5 and 6. 4.1 Transportation The configuration of SR 520 today, with its inadequate shoulders and gaps in HOV lanes, makes the corridor especially prone to traffic congestion. And, as commuters on SR 520 know, the corridor is overloaded with traffic on a regular basis. Population and employment continue to grow both on the Eastside and in Seattle, resulting in new travel patterns and a steady rise in the number of vehicles crossing the Evergreen Point Bridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Downtown Access Strategy Phase 1 Context Setting: Projects to Be Constructed in the Next 10 Years Table of Contents
    DOWNTOWN ACCESS STRATEGY PHASE 1 Context Setting: Projects to be Constructed in the Next 10 Years September 25, 2013 Downtown Access Strategy Phase 1 Context Setting: Projects to be Constructed in the Next 10 Years Table of Contents I. Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 II. Review of Existing Plans, Projects, and Programs ......................................... 2 III. Potential Construction Concerns and Opportunities .................................. 3 A. Existing Construction Planning Tools 3 B. SDOT’s Construction Hub Coordination Program 4 C. Construction Mitigation Strategies Used by Other Cities 7 D. Potential Construction Conflicts and Opportunities 10 IV. Future Transportation Network Opportunities ......................................... 12 A. North Downtown 12 B. Denny Triangle / Westlake Hub 14 C. Pioneer Square / Chinatown-ID 15 D. Downtown Core and Waterfront 16 V. Future Phases of Downtown Access Strategy ............................................. 18 A. Framework for Phase 2 (2014 through 2016) 18 B. Framework for Phase 3 (Beyond 2016) 19 - i - September 25, 2013 Downtown Access Strategy Phase 1 Context Setting: Projects to be Constructed in the Next 10 Years I. INTRODUCTION Many important and long planned transportation and development projects are scheduled for con- struction in Downtown Seattle in the coming years. While these investments are essential to support economic development and job growth and to enhance Downtown’s stature as the region’s premier location to live, work, shop and play, in the short-term they present complicated challenges for con- venient and reliable access to and through Downtown. The Downtown Seattle Association (DSA) and its partners, Historic South Downtown (HSD) and the Seat- tle Department of Transportation (SDOT), seek to ensure that Downtown Seattle survives and prospers during the extraordinarily high level of construction activity that will occur in the coming years.
    [Show full text]
  • King County Official Local Voters' Pamphlet
    August 6, 2013 Primary and Special Election King County Official Local Voters’ Pamphlet For more information call 206-296-VOTE (8683) or visit www.kingcounty.gov/elections A letter from the Director, Sherril Huff Dear King County Voter: Another graduation season just passed bringing the reminder of how fast change happens. We’ve been voting by mail for four years in King County and each has been one of signifi cant change. King County voters have done a great job adjusting to change and you may appreciate knowing that your elections department has as well. With over 1.17 million voters spread out over more than 2,000 voting districts, the challenge to implement change, while protecting the integrity of each vote has been, at times, a monumental endeavor. In our quest to make elections processes more effi cient and reduce costs, the world of technology has certainly provided a range of remarkable options. However, it’s been our impatient, questioning and innovative work force that has been the strong, beating heart of the most effective, forward-thinking changes. Thanks to them, we have achieved greater effi ciency, resolved problems and improved our ability to meet expectations of King County voters. We are working to provide outstanding voter experiences, employing means that offer more choices each year. Multi-channel delivery, empowerment, simplifi ed and streamlined options, and relevancy-- this is a vocabulary that is associated today with service. We have also benefi tted from the help of many strategic partnerships, including vendors, other public agencies, and organizations. We are working together to make sure more citizens are engaged in voting with better understanding of the voting process.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Law Project List
    05-07 House Transportation Committee Current Law Projects ($ in Thousands) 10-Yr Route Leg Dist Project Title Ad Date 05-07 Total Improvement Mobility 003 23 SR 3/SR 303 I/C (WAAGA WAY) - NEW RAMP 05/16/05 16,241 16,241 004 19 SR 4/SVENSEN`S CURVE - REALIGNMENT 3,390 4,380 005 29,27,25,30,33,11,37I-5/TACOMA TO EVERETT - FREIGHT ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS 333 333 005 30 I-5/SR 161 I/C & SR 18 I/C 2,580 2,580 005 30,33,11 I-5/PIERCE CO. LINE TO TUKWILA I/C - HOV 09/10/90 49,467 50,154 005 33,11 I-5/PIERCE CO. LINE TO TUKWILA I/C - HOV AND CLIMBING LANE 10/10/94 0 0 005 32 I-5/NE 175TH ST TO NE 205TH ST - NORTHBOUND AUXILIARY LANE 10/04/04 5,881 5,881 005 21,01 I-5/196TH ST SW(SR 524) I/C - PHASE C:COLLECTOR-DISTRIBUTOR LANES 0 0 005 01,21,44,38 I-5/164TH ST SW TO SR 526 - HOV AND INTERCHANGE MODIFICATIONS 07/15/96 857 1,855 005 44,21 I-5/128TH ST SW (SR96) INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS 0 0 005 44,21 SR5/124TH ST. SW, BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN O`XING 05/31/05 3,901 3,901 005 44,38 I-5/SR 526 TO MARINE VIEW DRIVE - HOV LANES 112,968 200,968 005 10 I-5/172ND ST NE (SR 531) INTERCHANGE MODIFICATIONS 05/10/04 2,544 2,544 005 42 I-5 BLAINE EXIT I/C IMPROVEMENTS 1,900 2,493 005 25,27 I-5/PORT OF TACOMA RD TO KING CO LINE - HOV 88 319 005 25,27 I-5/PORT OF TACOMA RD TO KING CO LINE - HOV 01/20/09 2,811 29,834 005 22 I-5/MARTIN WAY O`XING - BIKE LANES 05/07/07 60 659 005 25,27 I-5/PORT OF TACOMA I/C, CORE HOV 382 715 005 29,27 I-5/SR 16 REALIGNMENT AND HOV CONNECTORS 741 1,760 005 29,27 I-5/SR 16 I/C / 38TH ST I/C - CORE HOV 07/17/00 1,827 158,145 005 29,27 I-5/S 48TH TO PACIFIC AVENUE - CORE HOV 02/22/05 73,947 86,493 005 28,29,27,25 I-5/TACOMA VIC HOV - PROJECT DEFINITION 993 993 005 20 I-5/GRAND MOUND TO MAYTOWN - WIDENING 3,969 73,792 005 22 I-5/CHEHALIS WESTERN TRAIL PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE - NEW STRUCTURE 09/06/05 2,006 2,006 005 49 COLUMBIA RIVER CROSSING/ VANCOUVER- EIS 2,402 3,448 005 49,18 I-5/NE 134TH ST INTERCHANGE (I-5/I-205)- REBUILD TO RELIEVE CONGEST.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Qualifications Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project
    Submitted by: Kiewit Pacific Co. Statement of Qualifications Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project Specification No. PW10-0128F Submitted to: Purchasing Office, Tacoma Public Utilities 3628 South 35th Street, Tacoma, WA 98409 June 8, 2010 Tab No. 1 - General Company Information & Team Structure Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project Project TAB NO.1 - GENERAL COMPANY INFORMATION AND TEAM STRUCTURE Kiewit Pacific Co., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Kiewit Infrastructure Group, Inc., will be the contracting party for this project, as indicated on Forms 3 and 4 in Tab No. 4 - Appendix C. As a wholly-owned subsidiary, none of the officers of Kiewit Pacific Co. (Kiewit) own stock. Incorporated on May 18, 1982, we can trace our history back to 1884, when Peter and Andrew Kiewit formed Kiewit Brothers, an Omaha masonry contracting partnership. Today, we are part of one of North America's largest and most respected construction and mining organizations. We take our place in the corporate structure of our parent company, Kiewit Infrastructure Group Inc., alongside Kiewit Construction Company and Kiewit Southern Co. Our affiliates and subsidiaries, as well as those of our parent company, operate from a network of offices throughout North America. We draw upon the Kiewit Corporation’s collective experience and personnel to assemble the strongest team possible for a given project. Therefore, work experience of such affiliates and subsidiaries is relevant in demonstrating our capabilities. For the Murray Morgan Bridge, we are supplementing our local talent with extensive moveable bridge expertise from our east coast operations, Kiewit Constructors, Inc. We are also utilizing our local subsidiary, General Construction Company (General), for mechanical and electrical expertise.
    [Show full text]
  • Americanization and Cultural Preservation in Seattle's Settlement House: a Jewish Adaptation of the Anglo-American Model of Settlement Work
    The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare Volume 26 Issue 3 September Article 3 September 1999 Americanization and Cultural Preservation in Seattle's Settlement House: A Jewish Adaptation of the Anglo-American Model of Settlement Work Alissa Schwartz Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/jssw Part of the Social Work Commons Recommended Citation Schwartz, Alissa (1999) "Americanization and Cultural Preservation in Seattle's Settlement House: A Jewish Adaptation of the Anglo-American Model of Settlement Work," The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare: Vol. 26 : Iss. 3 , Article 3. Available at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/jssw/vol26/iss3/3 This Article is brought to you by the Western Michigan University School of Social Work. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Americanization and Cultural Preservation in Seattle's Settlement House: A Jewish Adaptation of the Anglo-American Model of Settlement Work ALISSA SCHWARTZ New York City This articleexamines the dual agendas of Americanization and preserva- tion of Ashkenazic Jewish culture through an historicalanalysis of the work of Seattle's Settlement House, a social service center founded in 1906 by elite, Americanized Jews to serve poorer, immigrant Jews of Ashkenazic and Sephardic origin. Such analysis is set against the ideologicalbackdrop of Anglo-Americanism which pervaded the field of social work in its early efforts at self-definition and professionalization.Particular attention is paid to the role of the arts at Settlement House, with comparisons to Chicago's Hull-House, the prototypical American settlement operating at the turn of the century. This case study analyzes a German Jewish adaptationof an Anglo-American, Christian model of social work.
    [Show full text]
  • Gray Notebook 37
    The Gray GNB Notebook 37 WSDOT’s quarterly performance report Quarter ending on transportation systems, programs, March 31, 2010 and department management published Paula J. Hammond, P. E. May 21, 2010 Secretary of Transportation In this edition Annual Reports Safety Rest Areas Post Winter Highway Maintenance Aviation Trucks, Goods & Freight Water Quality Wetlands Protection Quarterly Reports Incident Response Rail Ferries Capital Projects Workforce Special Reports Federal Recovery Act- funded Projects WSDOT ’s New Stormwater Permit www.wsdot.wa.gov/ accountability Executive Summary Performance highlights in this edition of the Gray Notebook This edition of the Gray Notebook presents information on WSDOT’s performance for the quarter ending March 31, 2010, as well as seven annual and three semi-annual reports. Selected highlights from this edition include: • Truck freight volumes in 2009 began to rebound to pre-2008 levels, but other freight modes report mixed performance in 2009 and 2008. In 2009, marine shipments were down 12.5%, but Washington grain and produce rail car usage both improved. In 2008, total rail freight shipments were down .25%, but total air freight shipments increased by 5%. The Truck Freight Performance Measure pilot project will help WSDOT identify freight bottlenecks in the Puget Sound region as well as major cross-state truck corridors. WSDOT will continue to develop strategic business directions for the new transportation policy goal addressing Economic Vitality set by the Legislature in March 2010 (see page 45). (Trucks, Goods & Freight Annual Report; pp. 46-54) • More than 21.8 million visitors made use of the state’s Safety Rest Areas, an increase of 7% over 2008.
    [Show full text]