Grand Duchy of Lithuania

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Grand Duchy of Lithuania Grand Duchy of Lithuania The Grand Duchy of Lithuania was a European state the neighbours, with a truncated state (principal cities be- from the 13th century[1] until 1795.[2] The state was ing Kraków, Warsaw and Vilnius) remaining only nom- founded by the Lithuanians, one of the polytheistic Baltic inally independent. After the Kościuszko Uprising, the tribes from Aukštaitija.[3][4][5] territory was partitioned among the Russian Empire, the Kingdom of Prussia, and Austria in 1795. The duchy later expanded to include large portions of the former Kievan Rus’ and other Slavic lands, covering the territory of present-day Belarus, Latvia, and Lithuania, and parts of Estonia, Poland, Russia, and Ukraine. At its 1 Etymology greatest extent in the 15th century, it was the largest state in Europe.[6] It was a multi-ethnic and multi-confessional The Statutes of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania name state with great diversity in languages, religion, and cul- the complete name of the state as Grand Duchy tural heritage. of Lithuania, Ruthenia and Samogitia (Ruthenian: Consolidation of the Lithuanian lands began in the late Великое князство Литовское, Руское, Жомойтское [13][14] 12th century. Mindaugas, the first ruler of the Grand и иных). The title of “Grand Duchy” was con- Duchy, was crowned as Catholic King of Lithuania in sistently applied to Lithuania from the 14th century [15] 1253. The pagan state was targeted in the religious cru- onward. sade by the Teutonic Knights and the Livonian Order. In other languages, the Grand Duchy is referred to as: The multi-ethnic and multi-confessional state emerged [7] only at the late reign of Gediminas and continued to • Belarusian: Вялікае Княства Літоўскае expand under his son Algirdas.[8] Algirdas’s successor Jogaila signed the Union of Krewo in 1386, bringing • German: Großfürstentum Litauen two major changes in the history of the Grand Duchy of • Lithuania: conversion to Catholicism and establishment Estonian: Leedu Suurvürstiriik of a dynastic union between the Grand Duchy of Lithua- • Latin: Magnus Ducatus Lituaniae nia and the Crown of the Kingdom of Poland.[9] • The reign of Vytautas the Great marked both the great- Lithuanian: Lietuvos Didžioji Kunigaikštystė est territorial expansion of the Grand Duchy and the de- • Old literary Lithuanian: Didi Kunigystė Lietuvos feat of the Teutonic Knights in the Battle of Grunwald in 1410. It also marked the rise of the Lithuanian nobility. • Latvian: Lieitija or Lietuvas Lielkņaziste After Vytautas’s death, Lithuania’s relationship with the • Kingdom of Poland greatly deteriorated.[10] Lithuanian Polish: Wielkie Księstwo Litewskie noblemen, including the Radvila family (Radziwiłłs), at- • Ruthenian: Великое князство Литовское tempted to break the personal union with Poland.[11] However, the unsuccessful Muscovite–Lithuanian Wars • Russian: Великое княжество Литовское with the Grand Duchy of Moscow forced the union to • [14] remain intact. Ukrainian: Велике князiвство Литовське Eventually, the Union of Lublin of 1569 created a new state, the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth. In this 2 History federation, the Grand Duchy of Lithuania maintained its political distinctiveness and had separate government, laws, army, and treasury.[12] This federation was termi- 2.1 Establishment of the state nated by the passing of the Constitution of May 3, 1791, and since then there was supposed to be but a single coun- Main article: History of Lithuania (1219–1295) try — Respublica Poloniae — under one monarch and The first written reference to Lithuania is found in the one parliament. Shortly after, the unitary character of the Quedlinburg Chronicle, which dates from 1009.[16] In state was confirmed by adopting the Reciprocal Guaran- the 12th century, Slavic chronicles refer to Lithuania as tee of Two Nations. The newly reformed Commonwealth one of the areas attacked by the Rus’. Pagan Lithuani- was invaded by Russia in 1792 and partitioned between ans initially paid tribute to Polotsk, but they soon grew in strength and organized their own small-scale raids. At 1 2 2 HISTORY Navahrudak Castle the Samogitians, led by Vykintas, defeated the Livonian Order in the Battle of Saule. The Order was forced to be- come a branch of the Teutonic Knights in Prussia, mak- ing Samogitia, a strip of land that separated Livonia from Balts in the 12th century Prussia, the main target of both orders. The battle pro- vided a break in the wars with the Knights, and Lithua- nia exploited this situation, arranging attacks towards the Ruthenian provinces and annexing Navahrudak and some point between 1180 and 1183 the situation began Hrodna.[22] Belarusian historians consider that Mindаu- to change, and the Lithuanians started to organize sus- gas was invited to rule Navahrudak and that the union tainable military raids on the Slavic provinces, raiding was peaceful.[23][24] the Principality of Polotsk as well as Pskov, and even threatening Novgorod.[17] The sudden spark of military raids marked consolidation of the Lithuanian lands in Aukštaitija.[1] The Livonian Order and Teutonic Knights, crusading military orders, were established in Riga in 1202 and in Prussia in 1226. The Christian orders posed a sig- nificant threat to pagan Baltic tribes and further gal- vanized the formation of the state. The peace treaty with Galicia–Volhynia of 1219 provides evidence of co- operation between Lithuanians and Samogitians. This treaty lists 21 Lithuanian dukes, including five senior Trakai Island Castle Lithuanian dukes from Aukštaitija (Živinbudas, Daujotas, Vilikaila, Dausprungas and Mindaugas) and several dukes from Žemaitija. Although they had battled in the past, In 1248 a civil war broke out between Mindaugas and the Lithuanians and the Žemaičiai now faced a common his nephews Tautvilas and Edivydas. The powerful coali- [18] [17] enemy. Likely Živinbudas had the most authority tion against Mindaugas included Vykintas, the Livonian [19] and at least several dukes were from the same families. Order, Daniel of Galicia, and Vasilko of Volhynia. Min- The formal acknowledgment of common interests and the daugas, taking advantage of internal conflicts, allied with establishment of a hierarchy among the signatories of the the Livonian Order. He promised to convert to Chris- treaty foreshadowed the emergence of the state. tianity and gift some lands in western Lithuania in ex- change for military assistance against his nephews and the royal crown. In 1251 Mindaugas was baptized and 2.2 Kingdom of Lithuania Pope Innocent IV issued a papal bull proclaiming the cre- ation of the Kingdom of Lithuania. After the civil war Main article: Kingdom of Lithuania ended, Mindaugas was crowned as King of Lithuania on Mindaugas, duke[20] of southern Lithuania,[21] was July 6, 1253, starting a decade of relative peace. Min- among the five senior dukes mentioned in the treaty with daugas later renounced Christianity and converted back Galicia–Volhynia. The Livonian Rhymed Chronicle, re- to paganism. Mindaugas tried to expand his influence ports that by the mid-1230s Mindaugas had acquired in Polatsk, a major center of commerce in the Daugava supreme power in the whole of Lithuania.[22] In 1236, River basin, and Pinsk.[22] The Teutonic Knights used this 2.4 Territorial expansion 3 period to strengthen their position in parts of Samogi- the Yotvingians in 1283; the Livonian Order completed tia and Livonia, but they lost the Battle of Skuodas in its conquest of Semigalia, the last Baltic ally of Lithuania, 1259 and the Battle of Durbe in 1260, encouraging the in 1291.[26] The Orders could now turn their full attention conquered Semigallians and Prussians to rebel against the to Lithuania. The “buffer zone” composed of other Baltic Knights. tribes had disappeared, and Grand Duchy of Lithuania Encouraged by Treniota, Mindaugas broke the peace with was left to battle the Orders on its own. the Order, possibly reverted to pagan beliefs, and allied The Gediminids dynasty ruled the Grand Duchy for with Alexander Nevsky of Novgorod. He hoped to unite over a century, and Vytenis was the first ruler from the all Baltic tribes under the Lithuanian leadership. As mili- dynasty.[27] During his reign Lithuania engaged in con- tary campaigns were not successful, the relationships be- stant warfare with the Order, the Kingdom of Poland, tween Mindaugas and Treniota deteriorated. Treniota to- and Ruthenia. Vytenis was involved in succession dis- gether with Daumantas assassinated Mindaugas and his putes in Poland, supporting Boleslaus II of Masovia, who two sons, Ruklys and Rupeikis, in 1263,[25] and the state was married to a Lithuanian duchess, Gaudemunda. In lapsed into years of internal fights. Ruthenia, Vytenis managed to recapture lands lost after the assassination of Mindaugas and to capture the prin- cipalities of Pinsk and Turaŭ. In the struggle against the 2.3 Rise of the Gediminids Order, Vytenis allied with citizens of Riga; securing po- sitions in Riga strengthened trade routes and provided a base for further military campaigns. Around 1307, Polotsk, an important trading center, was annexed by mil- itary force.[28] Vytenis also began the construction of a defensive castle network along the Neman River. Grad- ually this network developed into the main defensive line against the Teutonic Order. 2.4 Territorial expansion The expansion of the state reached its height under Grand Duke Gediminas, who created a strong central govern- ment and established an empire that later spread from the Black Sea to the Baltic Sea. In 1320, most of the prin- cipalities of western Rus’ were either vassalized or an- nexed by Lithuania. In 1321 Gediminas captured Kiev, sending Stanislav, the last Rurikid to rule Kiev, into ex- ile. Gediminas also re-established the permanent capi- tal of the Grand Duchy in Vilnius, presumably moving it from Trakai in 1323; some researchers, such as Maciej Stryjkowski,[29] claim that Navahrudak was the capital of the 13th century state. Gediminas Tower in Vilnius From 1263 to 1269, Lithuania had three Grand Dukes – Treniota, Vaišvilkas, and Svarn.
Recommended publications
  • The Concept of Love in Lithuanian Folklore and Mythology
    THE CONCEPT OF LOVE IN LITHUANIAN FOLKLORE AND MYTHOLOGY Doc dr. Daiva Šeškauskaitė Department of Social and Humanities Sciences Faculty of Forestry and Landscape Planing Kaunas Forestry and Environmental Engineering University of Applied Sciences Lithuania ABSTRACT Love is a reserved feeling, meaning amiability and complete internecine understanding. The concept of love has always been important for human world outlook and attitude. Love can have different meaning and expression – for some people it is a nice, warm feeling, a way of action and behaviour, for others it is nothing more than a sexual attraction. As there are different perceptions of love, there also exist few common love manifestations: love can be maternal, childish, juvenile, sexual. Love can also be felt for a home land, own nation, home. Naturally love can be expressed through the particular rituals, symbols and signs. Folk songs introduce four main lover characteristics: beauty, sweetness, kindness and boon. The later feature means that a girl/ boy is supposed to be well-set, to be pleasant and comfortable to touch which is very important when choosing a wife or a husband. Love in folklore is expressed through the common metaphorical and allegorical symbols, it doesn‘t sound as explicit word – more like a metaphor or epithet. Love in folklore can be perceived and felt very differently. Love like an action – love like... special person, essential possession. Prime personal characteristics, such as kindness, tenderness, humility, are the ones to light the love fire as well as beauty, artfulness, eloquence also help. Love is supposed to lead to the sacred sacrament of marriage.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lithuanian Apidėmė: a Goddess, a Toponym, and Remembrance Vykintas Vaitkevičius, University of Klaipeda
    Scandinavian World. Minneapolis / London: [Sveinbjörn Egilsson, Rafn Þ. Gudmundsson & Rasmus University of Minnesota Press. Rask (eds.).] 1827. Saga Olafs konungs Power, Rosemary. 1985. “‘An Óige, an Saol agus an Tryggvasonar. Nidrlag sogunnar med tilheyrandi Bás’, Feis Tighe Chonáin and ‘Þórr’s Visit to tattum. Fornmanna sögur 3: Niðrlag sögu Ólafs Útgarða-Loki’”. Béaloideas 53: 217–294. konúngs Tryggvasonar með tilheyrandi þáttum. Robinson, Tim. 2008. Stones of Aran: Pilgrimage. Kaupmannahøfn: Harðvíg Friðrek Popp. Introduction by Robert Macfarlane. London: Faber Thompson, Stith. 1955–1958. Motif-Index of Folk- & Faber. Literature: A Classification of Narrative Elements in Robinson, Tim. 2009. Stones of Aran: Labyrinth. Folktales, Ballads, Myths, Fables, Mediaeval Introduction by John Elder. New York: New York Romances, Exempla, Fabliaux, Jest-Books, and Review of Books. Local Legends. Rev. & enlarged edn. Bloomington / Schama, Simon. 1996. Landscape and Memory. New Indianapolis: Indiana University Press. Available at: York: Vintage Books. https://www.ualberta.ca/~urban/Projects/English/M Sigurgeir Steingrímsson, Ólafur Halldórsson, & Peter otif_Index.htm (last accessed 17 October 2017). Foote. 2003. Biskupa sögur 1: Síðari hluti – Tietz, Andrea. 2012. Die Saga von Þorsteinn sögutextar. Íslenzk Fornrit 15. Reykjavík: Hið bæjarmagn – Saga af Þorsteini bæjarmagni: Íslenzka Fornritafélag. Übersetzung und Kommentar. Münchner Smith, Jonathan Z. 1987. To Take Place: Toward Nordistische Studien 12. München: Utz. Theory in Ritual. Chicago / London: University of Chicago Press. The Lithuanian Apidėmė: A Goddess, a Toponym, and Remembrance Vykintas Vaitkevičius, University of Klaipeda Abstract: This paper is devoted to the Lithuanian apidėmė, attested since the 16th century as the name of a goddess in the Baltic religion, as a term for the site of a former farmstead relocated to a new settlement during the land reform launched in 1547–1557, and later as a widespread toponym.
    [Show full text]
  • Ilga Jansone, Anna Stafecka ATLAS of the BALTIC
    DOI: 10.11649/abs.2013.034 Acta Baltico-Slavica, 37 SOW, Warszawa 2013 Ilga Jansone, Anna Stafecka Latvian Language Institute of the University of Latvia Riga ATLAS OF THE BALTIC LANGUAGES: PLANT NAMES OF SLAVONIC ORIGIN Latvian and Lithuanian are the only Baltic languages still alive. They both have his- torically developed regional territorial dialects. Traditionally, three Latvian dialects are distinguished. Middle dialect is spoken in Kurzeme, Vidzeme and Zemgale. For the Livo- nian dialect, the area of distribution is Northern Kurzeme and North Western Vidzeme. High Latvian dialect is used in the eastern part of Latvia. The Latvian dialects are further divided into 500 small territorial units called subdialects which are united in certain groups. Lithuanian language has two main dialects: Aukshtaitian and Zhemaitian. Lithu- anian dialects are also divided into groups of subdialects, these groups containing more than 700 smaller dialectal units. Historical regional dialects are relatively well-preserved both in Latvia and Lithuania. Nevertheless, nowadays they are disappearing. This was the reason why the dialectologists of the Latvian Language Institute of the University of Latvia, and the Department of Language History and Dialectology of the Institute of the Lithuanian Language, have developed a joint project entitled Atlas of the Baltic Languages, which is intended to demonstrate the close kinship of these two Baltic languages. In 2009, the pilot project volume of the Atlas of the Baltic Languages, including 12 geolinguistic maps
    [Show full text]
  • The Construction of Pagan Identity in Lithuanian “Pagan Metal” Culture
    VYTAUTO DIDŢIOJO UNIVERSITETAS SOCIALINIŲ MOKSLŲ FAKULTETAS SOCIOLOGIJOS KATEDRA Agnė Petrusevičiūtė THE CONSTRUCTION OF PAGAN IDENTITY IN LITHUANIAN “PAGAN METAL” CULTURE Magistro baigiamasis darbas Socialinės antropologijos studijų programa, valstybinis kodas 62605S103 Sociologijos studijų kryptis Vadovas Prof. Ingo W. Schroeder _____ _____ (Moksl. laipsnis, vardas, pavardė) (Parašas) (Data) Apginta _________________________ ______ _____ (Fakulteto/studijų instituto dekanas/direktorius) (Parašas) (Data) Kaunas, 2010 1 Table of contents SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................ 4 SANTRAUKA .................................................................................................................................... 6 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 8 I. THEORIZING ―SUBCULTURE‖: LOOKING AT SCIENTIFIC STUDIES .............................. 13 1.1. Overlooking scientific concepts in ―subcultural‖ research ..................................................... 13 1.2. Assumptions about origin of ―subcultures‖ ............................................................................ 15 1.3 Defining identity ...................................................................................................................... 15 1.3.1 Identity and ―subcultures‖ ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Constructions and Instrumentalization of the Past: a Comparative Study on Memory Management in the Region
    CBEES State of the Region Report 2020 Constructions and Instrumentalization of the Past A Comparative Study on Memory Management in the Region Published with support from the Foundation for Baltic and East European Studies (Östersjstiftelsen) Constructions and Instrumentalization of the Past A Comparative Study on Memory Management in the Region December 2020 Publisher Centre for Baltic and East European Studies, CBEES, Sdertrn University © CBEES, Sdertrn University and the authors Editor Ninna Mrner Editorial Board Joakim Ekman, Florence Frhlig, David Gaunt, Tora Lane, Per Anders Rudling, Irina Sandomirskaja Layout Lena Fredriksson, Serpentin Media Proofreading Bridget Schaefer, Semantix Print Elanders Sverige AB ISBN 978-91-85139-12-5 4 Contents 7 Preface. A New Annual CBEES Publication, Ulla Manns and Joakim Ekman 9 Introduction. Constructions and Instrumentalization of the Past, David Gaunt and Tora Lane 15 Background. Eastern and Central Europe as a Region of Memory. Some Common Traits, Barbara Trnquist-Plewa ESSAYS 23 Victimhood and Building Identities on Past Suffering, Florence Frhlig 29 Image, Afterimage, Counter-Image: Communist Visuality without Communism, Irina Sandomirskaja 37 The Toxic Memory Politics in the Post-Soviet Caucasus, Thomas de Waal 45 The Flag Revolution. Understanding the Political Symbols of Belarus, Andrej Kotljarchuk 55 Institutes of Trauma Re-production in a Borderland: Poland, Ukraine, and Lithuania, Per Anders Rudling COUNTRY BY COUNTRY 69 Germany. The Multi-Level Governance of Memory as a Policy Field, Jenny Wstenberg 80 Lithuania. Fractured and Contested Memory Regimes, Violeta Davoliūtė 87 Belarus. The Politics of Memory in Belarus: Narratives and Institutions, Aliaksei Lastouski 94 Ukraine. Memory Nodes Loaded with Potential to Mobilize People, Yuliya Yurchuk 106 Czech Republic.
    [Show full text]
  • The Grunwald Trail
    n the Grunwald fi elds thousands of soldiers stand opposite each other. Hidden below the protec- tive shield of their armour, under AN INVITATION Obanners waving in the wind, they hold for an excursion along long lances. Horses impatiently tear their bridles and rattle their hooves. Soon the the Grunwald Trail iron regiments will pounce at each other, to clash in a deadly battle And so it hap- pens every year, at the same site knights from almost the whole of Europe meet, reconstructing events which happened over six hundred years ago. It is here, on the fi elds between Grunwald, Stębark and Łodwigowo, where one of the biggest battles of Medieval Europe took place on July . The Polish and Lithuanian- Russian army, led by king Władysław Jagiełło, crushed the forces of the Teutonic Knights. On the battlefi eld, knights of the order were killed, together with their chief – the great Master Ulrich von Jungingen. The Battle of Grunwald, a triumph of Polish and Lithuanian weapons, had become the symbol of power of the common monarchy. When fortune abandoned Poland and the country was torn apart by the invaders, reminiscence of the battle became the inspiration for generations remembering the past glory and the fi ght for national independence. Even now this date is known to almost every Pole, and the annual re- enactment of the battle enjoys great popularity and attracts thousands of spectators. In Stębark not only the museum and the battlefi eld are worth visiting but it is also worthwhile heading towards other places related to the great battle with the Teutonic Knights order.
    [Show full text]
  • Haličo-Voluinės (Hipatijaus) Metraščio Lietuviškos Žinios1
    HALIČO-VOLUINĖS (HIPATIJAUS) METRAŠČIO LIETUVIŠKOS 1 ŽINIOS [A. Danieliaus Haličiečio metraštis (1205–1259) 1. Pradinis Haličo metraščio pasakojimas] (st. 721) [1208–1209 m.] <...> Aleksandrui valdant Vladimirą, o jo broliui Vsevolodui – Červenę, lietuviai su jotvingiais užpuolė ir nusiaubė Turijsko ir Komovo apylinkes iki pat Červenės, ir kovėsi prie Červenės vartų. Apsauginis būrys buvo Uchaniuose, tuomet ir Užmušė Liubovo žentą Motiejų ir Dobrogstą, išjojusius į sargybą. Nelaimė ištiko Vladimiro žemę dėl lietuvių ir jotvingių antpuolio! O mes grįžkime prie ankstesnių [dalykų]. <...> [2. Pasakojimas apie Danieliaus įsigalėjimą Voluinėje] (st. 7352) [1219 m.] <...> Dievui liepus, lietuvių kunigaikščiai atsiuntė [pasiuntinius] pas didžiąją kunigaikštienę Romanovienę ir Danielių, ir Vasilką, dovanodami3 taiką. Lietuvių kunigaikščių vardai: šie vyriausieji – Živinbudas, Daujotas, Dausprungas, jo brolis Mindaugas, Daujoto brolis Viligaila; o žemaičių kunigaikščiai – Gerdvilas, Vykintas; o Ruškaičiai – Kintibutas, Vambutas, Butautas, Vyžeikis ir jo sūnus Vislius: Kintenis, Plikienė4; o Bulevičiai – Vismantas, jį nužudė tas Mindaugas ir vedė jo žmoną, ir jo brolius išžudė: Gedvilą ir Sprudeikį; o Deltuvos kunigaikščių vardai – Judeikis, Pukeikis, Bikšys. Lygeikis. Šie visi kunigaikščiai suteikė taiką kunigaikščiui Danieliui ir Vasilkui ir žemė buvo rami. Lenkams nesiliaujant darius žalą, [jie] atvedė prieš juos lietuvius5. Kariavo prieš lenkus ir daug jų nužudė. <...> [3. Pasakojimas apie Danieliaus įsigalėjimą Haličo sostinėje] (st. 754) [1229 m.] <...> Po savo brolio mirties6 Konradas parodė didelę malonę Danieliui ir Vasilkui, ir todėl prašė jų ateiti jam į pagalbą Ir [jie] atėjo jam į pagalbą prieš Vladislovą Senąjį. Patys ėjo į karą, o Breste paliko Pinsko [kunigaikštį] Vladimirą7, ugroviečius ir brestiečius, kad jie saugotų žemę nuo jotvingių. Tuo pačiu metu lietuviai ėjo kariauti prieš lenkus, manydami, kad [rusai jiems] taikingi, ir 1 Pastaba: metraščio nuorašai išnašose pažymėti raidėmis: Ch.
    [Show full text]
  • Polish Battles and Campaigns in 13Th–19Th Centuries
    POLISH BATTLES AND CAMPAIGNS IN 13TH–19TH CENTURIES WOJSKOWE CENTRUM EDUKACJI OBYWATELSKIEJ IM. PŁK. DYPL. MARIANA PORWITA 2016 POLISH BATTLES AND CAMPAIGNS IN 13TH–19TH CENTURIES WOJSKOWE CENTRUM EDUKACJI OBYWATELSKIEJ IM. PŁK. DYPL. MARIANA PORWITA 2016 Scientific editors: Ph. D. Grzegorz Jasiński, Prof. Wojciech Włodarkiewicz Reviewers: Ph. D. hab. Marek Dutkiewicz, Ph. D. hab. Halina Łach Scientific Council: Prof. Piotr Matusak – chairman Prof. Tadeusz Panecki – vice-chairman Prof. Adam Dobroński Ph. D. Janusz Gmitruk Prof. Danuta Kisielewicz Prof. Antoni Komorowski Col. Prof. Dariusz S. Kozerawski Prof. Mirosław Nagielski Prof. Zbigniew Pilarczyk Ph. D. hab. Dariusz Radziwiłłowicz Prof. Waldemar Rezmer Ph. D. hab. Aleksandra Skrabacz Prof. Wojciech Włodarkiewicz Prof. Lech Wyszczelski Sketch maps: Jan Rutkowski Design and layout: Janusz Świnarski Front cover: Battle against Theutonic Knights, XVI century drawing from Marcin Bielski’s Kronika Polski Translation: Summalinguæ © Copyright by Wojskowe Centrum Edukacji Obywatelskiej im. płk. dypl. Mariana Porwita, 2016 © Copyright by Stowarzyszenie Historyków Wojskowości, 2016 ISBN 978-83-65409-12-6 Publisher: Wojskowe Centrum Edukacji Obywatelskiej im. płk. dypl. Mariana Porwita Stowarzyszenie Historyków Wojskowości Contents 7 Introduction Karol Olejnik 9 The Mongol Invasion of Poland in 1241 and the battle of Legnica Karol Olejnik 17 ‘The Great War’ of 1409–1410 and the Battle of Grunwald Zbigniew Grabowski 29 The Battle of Ukmergė, the 1st of September 1435 Marek Plewczyński 41 The
    [Show full text]
  • 100Th Anniversary of the National Flag of Poland 100Th Anniversary of the National Flag of Poland
    100th Anniversary of the National Flag of Poland 100th Anniversary of the National Flag of Poland The Polish white-and-red flag is only 100 tional colours was first used on a wider Face value: 10 zł Designer: Anna Wątróbska-Wdowiarska years old, even though it is the simplest scale in 1792, during the celebrations sign symbolising the White Eagle, which of the first anniversary of the passing of Metal: Ag 925/1000 Issuer: NBP has been the emblem of Poland for eight the Constitution of 3rd May. In 1831, the Finish: proof, UV print centuries. The upper white stripe of the Sejm of the Congress Kingdom of Poland Diameter: 32.00 mm The coins, commissioned by NBP, flag symbolises the Eagle, while the red adopted a white-and-red cockade as the Weight: 14.14 g were struck by Mennica Polska S.A. one symbolises the colour of the es- official national symbol. The design of the Edge: plain cutcheon. The flag in the form in which it flag used these days was only introduced Mintage: up to 13,000 pcs All Polish collector coins feature: is used these days was introduced only by the Legislative Sejm of the reborn Re- face value; image of the Eagle established after Poland regained its independence public of Poland on 1 August 1919. In the as the state emblem of the Republic of following the partitions. In the Middle first act on the coat-of-arms and the na- Poland; inscription: Rzeczpospolita Polska Ages, the ensign carried by knights of the tional colours of the Republic of Poland, year of issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Chairman of the NATO Military Committee Visited Lithuania
    SEPTEMBER 2020. NO 9 (28). NEWS NATO MILITARY COMMITTEE DISTANCE MEETING MULTINATIONAL AIR DEFENCE EXERCISE NATO'S PRESENCE LITHUANIA — THROUGH THE EYES OF A FRIEND Chairman of the NATO Military Committee visited Lithuania n September 25 Chairman of the tee to NATO’s political decision-making Military Committee (MC) Air structures. He directs and publicly represents Chief Marshal Sir Stuart William work of the NATO Military Committee. OPeach (United Kingdom — Air Force) con- Air Chief Marshal Sir Stuart William Peach SPECIAL duced an official visit to Lithuania. (United Kingdom — Air Force) assumed the FELIKSAS VAITKUS — He met with Speaker of the Lithuanian position on 18 June 2018. THE HERO OF A Parliament Viktoras Pranckietis, Chief of De- Air Chief Marshal Sir Stuart Peach (Uni- fence Lt Gen Valdemaras Rupšys, other rep- ted Kingdom — Air Force) is the 32nd Chair- TRANSATLANTIC FLIGHT resentatives of the Lithuanian Armed Forces. man of the Military Committee of the North The guest also visited the NATO Energy Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO); the Security Centre of Excellence in Vilnius and most senior and longest standing military received briefings on the regional security structure in the Alliance. situation from the Lithuanian Armed Forces Air Chief Marshal Peach is NATO’s most Defence Staff. senior military officer and is the Military -Ad Chairman of the NATO Military Com- viser to the Secretary General and the North mittee is chief military advisor to the NATO Atlantic Council. In addition, he is the Uni- Secretary General
    [Show full text]
  • Ukmergės Rajono Savivaldybė
    Anno 1333 LT | EN Wilkamergen Vilkenberge Wilkinberg Vilkomir Wilkomiria Wilkomierz Vilkmergė Aukmergė Anno 1333 edus su šviežiais agurkais – mėgstamas ukmergiškių desertas. Stanislovas Tačiau mažai kas žino, kad dar XIV a. būtent tokiu desertu lepinosi Augustas Žmonės Ukmergėje ir iš Ukmergės M Lenkijos karalius Jogaila, kurio įsakymu 1387 m. Ukmergėje Poniatovskis pastatyta medinė bažnyčia ir įkurta viena pirmųjų Lietuvos katalikų parapijų. biejų Tautų O agurkus į mūsų šalį tikriausiai atgabeno totorių kariai, atvežti galingiausio visų Respublikos People in Ukmergė and from Ukmergė laikų Lietuvos valdovo Vytauto, kuris kovų su Jogaila metu 1391 m. valdovas, 1792 m. nugriovė medinę Ukmergės pilį, stovėjusią ant piliakalnio. A Ukmergei suteikė herbą, pasirinktą pačių miestelėnų ir išlikusį iki šiol. Beje, Ukmergės herbe matomas he favourite sweet of Ukmergė raudonas veršis – karališkosios residents is fresh cucumber Poniatovskių giminės simbolis. ai nutiko prieš kokius 800 metų... Kartą ūksmingose giriose medžiojo T with honey. However, hardly jaunasis kunigaikštis Tautvilas. Kai nebeliko nė vienos strėlės, jį anyone knows that in the 14th century this dessert was enjoyed by užpuolė vilkai. Staiga pasirodė žynė vardu Vilkmergė. Ji sutramdė vilkus ir T Jagiello, King of Poland, išgelbėjo kunigaikščio gyvybę. Tautvilo tėvas Dausprungas, Lietuvos valstybės įkūrėjo under whose orders a wooden church Mindaugo brolis, prie Šventosios upės pastatė pilį ir žynės garbei pavadino Vilkmerge. was built in 1387, and one of the first Vardas prigijo ir visam miestui, kuris vėliau pervardytas Ukmerge. Catholic parishes was established in Tai sena legenda, užsimenanti apie pirmuosius garsius žmones, susijusius su Ukmergė. Ukmerge. Įžymybių pėdos įspaustos ir vėlesnėje miesto istorijoje. Cucumbers most likely were introduced to our country by Tartar he story goes back almost 800 years.
    [Show full text]
  • BORDERLANDS of WESTERN CIVILIZATION a His Tory of East
    BORDERLANDS OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION A His tory of East Cen tral Eu rope by OSCAR HALECKI Second Edition Edited by Andrew L. Simon Copyright © by Tadeusz Tchorzewski , 1980. ISBN: 0-9665734-8-X Library of Congress Card Number: 00-104381 All Rights Reserved. The text of this publication or any part thereof may not he reproduced in any manner whatsoever without permission in writing from the publisher. Published by Simon Publications, P.O. Box 321, Safety Harbor, FL 34695 Printed by Lightning Source, Inc. La Vergne , TN 37086 Con tents PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION 1 PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION 4 1 THE GEOGRAPHICAL AND ETHNOGRAPHICAL BACKGROUND 9 2 THE SLAVS AND THEIR NEIGHBORS 19 3 TOWARD POLITICAL ORGANIZATION 33 4 THE HERITAGE OF THE TENTH CENTURY 51 5 INTERNAL DISINTEGRATION AND FOREIGN PENETRATION 67 THE REPERCUSSIONS OF THE FOURTH CRUSADE IN THE BALKANS 77 6 THE HERITAGE OF THE THIRTEENTH CENTURY 93 7 THE NEW FORCES OF THE FOURTEENTH CENTURY 107 8 THE TIMES OF WLADYSLAW JAGIELLO AND SIGISMUND OF LUXEMBURG 135 9 THE LATER FIFTEENTH CENTURY 151 10 FROM THE FIRST CONGRESS OF VIENNA TO THE UNION OF LUBLIN 167 11 THE LATER SIXTEENTH CENTURY THE STRUGGLE FOR THE DOMINIUM MARIS BALTICI 197 12 THE FIRST HALF OF THE SEVENTEENTH CENTURY 219 13 THE SECOND HALF OF THE SEVENTEENTH CENTURY 239 14 THE END OF THE ANCIEN REGIME 261 15 THE PARTITIONS OF POLAND AND THE EASTERN QUESTION 289 16 THE NAPOLEONIC PERIOD 309 17 REVOLUTIONARY MOVEMENTS UNTIL 1848 325 18 FROM THE CRIMEAN WAR TO THE CONGRESS OF BERLIN 353 19 TOWARD WORLD WAR I 373 20 THE CONSEQUENCES OF WORLD WAR I 395 21 THE PEOPLES OF EAST CENTRAL EUROPE BETWEEN THE WARS 417 22 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS BETWEEN THE WARS 457 23 HITLER’S WAR 479 24 STALIN’S PEACE 499 BIBLIOGRAPHY 519 INDEX 537 PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION Polish born Oscar Halecki (1891 - 1973) was Professor of History at Cracow and Warsaw universities between the two world wars.
    [Show full text]