DOCSLIB.ORG

Diplomacy, Development, and Security in the Information

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Diplomacy, Development, and Security in the Information DIPLOMACY DEVELOPMENT and SECURITY in the INFORMATION AGE Shanthi Kalathil EDITOR Séverine Arsène David Faris Sarah Granger Craig Hayden georgetown university school of foreign service school of foreign university georgetown James Herlong Gerald Hyman Lorelei Kelly Andrew Puddephat Joseph Siegle James Valentine institute for the study of diplomacy ABOUT THE INSTITUTE The richness of Georgetown University and its close tive—now play increasingly important roles in the relationship to Washington’s politics and diplo- conduct of international politics and finance and are macy offer boundless opportunities for an institute leading us to think differently about global finance like ours. ISD’s presence at Georgetown reflects the and development, conflict and reconciliation. university’s dedication to study and action and to These new issues, conditions, and actors are help- social justice and global engagement. ing to refine, and perhaps redefine, what diplomacy The contours of diplomatic engagement are means and how it is conducted. They set the context changing rapidly, as are the environments in which for ISD’s work as we identify issues that are global in diplomacy is crafted, honed, and practiced. New origin and diplomatic reach, and examine carefully media have changed the pace and content of politi- the ways that states and nonstate actors respond to cal awareness and provided new tools for diploma- them and to one another. cy. Porous borders challenge national sovereignty, This agenda infuses our studies, teaching, train- the conduct of war, and the ways in which peace can ing, and outreach. Our associates and colleagues join be pursued. The capacities of states and multilateral with the many communities that engage the impor- institutions to prevent and fix problems are chal- tant, hard, enduring, and often unanswered issues lenged daily by the enormous agendas that global that define our global polity. Together, we study the issues like health and the environment pose for the ways that diplomacy can shape global action and international community. serve our complex global societies. And as we have Each of these global issues tests the assumptions for three decades, we continue to take our cues from and practices of traditional diplomacy. Perhaps the worlds of politics and education and from the most important for our work, nonstate actors— university’s generous and abiding commitments to whether benign or malign, constructive or disrup- the worlds of words and deeds. Institute for the Study of Diplomacy Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057–1025 Copyright 2013 by the Institute for the Study of Diplomacy. You are permitted to copy, distribute, and transmit this work, provided you attribute the work to the Institute for the Study of Diplomacy, do not use this work for commercial purposes, and that you may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. CONTENTS Acknowledgments v Introduction Transparency and Volatility: International Relations in the Information Age 3 Shanthi Kalathil Diplomacy in the Information Age Social Diplomacy, Public Diplomacy, and Network Power 17 Craig Hayden From the Age of Secrecy to the Age of Sharing: Social Media, Diplomacy, and Statecraft in the 21st Century 35 David M. Faris Development in the Information Age The Chinese ICT Development Strategy in Africa: Transparency, Sovereignty, and Soft Power 51 Séverine Arsène Complicating the Already Complicated: Diplomacy, Development, and the New Media 63 Gerald F. Hyman iii iv Contents Transparency in Aid Programs 79 Andrew Puddephatt Security in the Information Age Cybersecurity and Modern Grand Strategy 99 Sarah Granger & Lorelei Kelly Managing Volatility with the Expanded Access to Information in Fragile States 113 Joseph Siegle If You Are Seeking an Advantage, Information Does Not Matter 125 James Valentine & James Herlong About the Authors 139 Acknowledgments This volume began as a series of discussions with volume, somehow eliciting order from chaos. Char- Paula Newberg, then the head of the Institute for lie’s thoughtful comments, and his patient shep- the Study of Diplomacy (ISD) at Georgetown, who herding of the papers through publication, proved was particularly interested in exploring the com- invaluable. plexities of international affairs in the information The funding for my work on this project was pro- age. Her encouragement and insight helped shape vided by the Yahoo! Business and Human Rights the themes that have emerged here. I owe her and Program. I am thankful to them for making this pos- the Institute a debt of gratitude for providing a wel- sible. The Institute also wants to thank the Joseph coming platform to test and argue new ideas. J. Schott Foundation for its support of the author Additional food for thought was provided working group and the printing of the publication. through the lively lunch meetings of the Institute’s Finally, my deep appreciation goes to this vol- I-Diplomacy group, which met on a quarterly basis ume’s stellar lineup of authors, who have together to hash over issues ranging from Chinese soft power created an invaluable cache of knowledge. Their to the changing role of diplomats. dedication to this task has helped provide a build- Special acknowledgement and thanks are due ing block for future research and understanding of a to Katie Seckman and Charlie Dolgas at ISD. Katie crucially important, yet still emerging, area. skillfully managed the processes leading up to this Shanthi Kalathil v Introduction Transparency and Volatility: International Relations in the Information Age Shanthi Kalathil The information revolution is permanently chang- threats (cyber and otherwise), networked forms of ing the face of international relations. Wired, net- organization, asymmetrical conflict, decentraliza- worked protestors help power and publicize the tion, recentralization, altered global governance Arab Spring, leading to the downfall of authoritar- structures, multicentrism, information asymmetry, ian regimes long believed unshakable. Secret cables new development models, contested global norms, published by Wikileaks expose the mechanics of and much more. All of these present challenges and U.S. foreign policy decisionmaking to a global pub- opportunities for states and nonstate actors and re- lic. Chinese Internet users spread photo evidence to quire a substantial rethink of the lens through which expose corrupt local officials. Israelis and Palestin- we view international affairs. ians use video and social media to add another di- Yet fresh thinking on these issues, while taken up mension to real-time conflict. by specialized academics, rarely makes it onto the But what do these disparate events really tell us? public agenda. Such research tends to get tucked The popular narrative generally holds that time and away into the vibrant but often impenetrable (to distance are collapsing, everything and everyone outsiders) fiefdom of communications research, is scrutinized, filters are nonexistent, and nonstate such that followers of international affairs do not actors hold disproportionate and ever-increasing tend to encounter it on a regular basis, if at all. Thus, power. While powerful, and containing some ele- the initial analysis of events hardens into an ac- ments of truth, this narrative is rarely re-examined cepted truth, and it becomes increasingly difficult in the context of policy discourse or the decisions to pose alternate narratives or even further explore that arise from it. the dominant one. There is far more to understand about interna- This working paper series intends to illuminate tional relations in what is commonly termed the in- this narrative by delving further into the trends in formation age. Changes in the speed, volume diver- international affairs that have been accelerated or sity, nature and accessibility of information, as well otherwise augmented by the information revolu- as the ways in which it is exchanged, have contribut- tion. Because this task could easily prove unman- ed to a variety of emerging and evolving phenome- ageable, the series will examine in particular two na. These include the rise of nontraditional security separate but linked phenomena enhanced by the 3 4 Shanthi Kalathil INTRODUCTION information age: heightened transparency and in- than they deserve. creased volatility. This series thus proposes to unpack the concepts As Craig Hayden notes in his paper for this se- of transparency and volatility across three major are- ries, both transparency and volatility have come to nas of international affairs: security, diplomacy, and define the practice of contemporary diplomacy and development. Each issue-area features two essays, international relations. While separate, they are in- each focusing on different aspects of transparency creasingly inextricable, he argues—in that transpar- and/or volatility. Two additional essays (by Gerald ency is facilitated by the same information and com- Hyman and Joseph Siegle) examine the ramifica- munication technologies (ICT) that also promote tions of the growing interplay between issue-areas instability, risk, and uncertainty in international in the information age. Some authors situate their affairs. Civil society actors—including nongov- research within the context of academic literature, ernmental organizations (NGOs), citizen journal- while others are more focused on policy and/or ists, and the broad public—have been most visibly operational contexts. Taken together, the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Introduction
    Notes Introduction 1. M. Wight, Power Politics (Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1978), p. 113. 2. R. Cohen, "Putting Diplomatic Studies on the Map," Diplomatic Studies Programme Newsletter, Leicester University, 4 May 1998. 3. ]. DerDerian, "Mediating Estrangement: A Theory for Diplomacy," Review of International Studies, 13 (1987) 91. 4. S. Sofer, "Old and New Diplomacy: A Debate Revisited/' Review ofInternational Studies, 14 (1988) 196. 5. Ibid. 6. A. Eban, The New Diplomacy (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1983), pp. 384-5. 7. B.H. Steiner, "Another Missing Middle: Diplomacy and International Theory," paper delivered to the 41st Annual Convention of the International Studies Association, Los Angeles, 15-18 March 2000, p. 1. 8. Sofer, "Old and New Diplomacy," p. 196. 9. Cf. S. Goddard, "Talk Is Not Cheap: The Rhetoric of Strategic Interaction," paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, 2-5 September 2004. 10. L.B. Poullada, "Diplomacy: The Missing Link in the Study of International Politics," in D.S. McLellan, W.C. Olson and F.A. Sondermann (eds), The Theory and Practice of International Relations, 4th edn (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 197 4); cf. Steiner, "Another Missing Middle." 11. Eban, The New Diplomacy, p. 366. 12. ].W. Burton, Systems, States, Diplomacy and Rules (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1968), p. 206. 13. E. Satow, Satow's Guide to Diplomatic Practice, 5th edn, ed. Lord Gore-Booth (London and New York: Longman, 1979), p. 3. 14. Quoted in Eban, The New Diplomacy, p. 331. 15. C.W. Hayward, What Is Diplomacy? (London: Grant Richards, 1916), p.
    [Show full text]
  • Deception, Disinformation, and Strategic Communications: How One Interagency Group Made a Major Difference by Fletcher Schoen and Christopher J
    STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES 11 Deception, Disinformation, and Strategic Communications: How One Interagency Group Made a Major Difference by Fletcher Schoen and Christopher J. Lamb Center for Strategic Research Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University The Institute for National Strategic Studies (INSS) is National Defense University’s (NDU’s) dedicated research arm. INSS includes the Center for Strategic Research, Center for Complex Operations, Center for the Study of Chinese Military Affairs, Center for Technology and National Security Policy, Center for Transatlantic Security Studies, and Conflict Records Research Center. The military and civilian analysts and staff who comprise INSS and its subcomponents execute their mission by conducting research and analysis, publishing, and participating in conferences, policy support, and outreach. The mission of INSS is to conduct strategic studies for the Secretary of Defense, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Unified Combatant Commands in support of the academic programs at NDU and to perform outreach to other U.S. Government agencies and the broader national security community. Cover: Kathleen Bailey presents evidence of forgeries to the press corps. Credit: The Washington Times Deception, Disinformation, and Strategic Communications: How One Interagency Group Made a Major Difference Deception, Disinformation, and Strategic Communications: How One Interagency Group Made a Major Difference By Fletcher Schoen and Christopher J. Lamb Institute for National Strategic Studies Strategic Perspectives, No. 11 Series Editor: Nicholas Rostow National Defense University Press Washington, D.C. June 2012 Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the contributors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Defense Department or any other agency of the Federal Government.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Diplomacy and Nation Branding: Conceptual Similarities and Differences
    DISCUSSION PAPERS IN DIPLOMACY Public Diplomacy and Nation Branding: Conceptual Similarities and Differences Gyorgy Szondi Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’ ISSN 1569-2981 DISCUSSION PAPERS IN DIPLOMACY Editors: Virginie Duthoit & Ellen Huijgh, Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’ Managing Editor: Jan Melissen, Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’ and Antwerp University Desk top publishing: Desiree Davidse Editorial Board Geoff Berridge, University of Leicester Rik Coolsaet, University of Ghent Erik Goldstein, Boston University Alan Henrikson, Tufts University Donna Lee, Birmingham University Spencer Mawby, University of Nottingham Paul Sharp, University of Minnesota Duluth Copyright Notice © Gyorgy Szondi, October 2008 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy, or transmission of this publication, or part thereof in excess of one paragraph (other than as a PDF file at the discretion of the Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’) may be made without the written permission of the author. ABSTRACT The aim of this study is to explore potential relationships between public diplomacy and nation branding, two emerging fields of studies, which are increasingly being used in the same context. After examining the origins of the two concepts, a review of definitions and conceptualisations provide a point of departure for exploring the relationship between the two areas. Depending on the degree of integration, five conceptual models are outlined, each with potential pitfalls as well as advantages. According to the first approach, public diplomacy and nation branding are unrelated and do not share any common grounds. In other views, however, these concepts are related and it is possible to identify different degrees of integration between public diplomacy and nation branding.
    [Show full text]
  • The Next Digital Decade Essays on the Future of the Internet
    THE NEXT DIGITAL DECADE ESSAYS ON THE FUTURE OF THE INTERNET Edited by Berin Szoka & Adam Marcus THE NEXT DIGITAL DECADE ESSAYS ON THE FUTURE OF THE INTERNET Edited by Berin Szoka & Adam Marcus NextDigitalDecade.com TechFreedom techfreedom.org Washington, D.C. This work was published by TechFreedom (TechFreedom.org), a non-profit public policy think tank based in Washington, D.C. TechFreedom’s mission is to unleash the progress of technology that improves the human condition and expands individual capacity to choose. We gratefully acknowledge the generous and unconditional support for this project provided by VeriSign, Inc. More information about this book is available at NextDigitalDecade.com ISBN 978-1-4357-6786-7 © 2010 by TechFreedom, Washington, D.C. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA. Cover Designed by Jeff Fielding. THE NEXT DIGITAL DECADE: ESSAYS ON THE FUTURE OF THE INTERNET 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword 7 Berin Szoka 25 Years After .COM: Ten Questions 9 Berin Szoka Contributors 29 Part I: The Big Picture & New Frameworks CHAPTER 1: The Internet’s Impact on Culture & Society: Good or Bad? 49 Why We Must Resist the Temptation of Web 2.0 51 Andrew Keen The Case for Internet Optimism, Part 1: Saving the Net from Its Detractors 57 Adam Thierer CHAPTER 2: Is the Generative
    [Show full text]
  • International Relations in a Changing World: a New Diplomacy? Edward Finn
    INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS IN A CHANGING WORLD: A NEW DIPLOMACY? EDWARD FINN Edward Finn is studying Comparative Literature in Latin and French at Princeton University. INTRODUCTION The revolutionary power of technology to change reality forces us to re-examine our understanding of the international political system. On a fundamental level, we must begin with the classic international relations debate between realism and liberalism, well summarised by Stephen Walt.1 The third paradigm of constructivism provides the key for combining aspects of both liberalism and realism into a cohesive prediction for the political future. The erosion of sovereignty goes hand in hand with the burgeoning Information Age’s seemingly unstoppable mechanism for breaking down physical boundaries and the conceptual systems grounded upon them. Classical realism fails because of its fundamental assumption of the traditional sovereignty of the actors in its system. Liberalism cannot adequately quantify the nebulous connection between prosperity and freedom, which it assumes as an inherent truth, in a world with lucrative autocracies like Singapore and China. Instead, we have to accept the transformative power of ideas or, more directly, the technological, social, economic and political changes they bring about. From an American perspective, it is crucial to examine these changes, not only to understand their relevance as they transform the US, but also their effects in our evolving global relationships.Every development in international relations can be linked to some event that happened in the past, but never before has so much changed so quickly at such an expansive global level. In the first section of this article, I will examine the nature of recent technological changes in diplomacy and the larger derivative effects in society, which relate to the future of international politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Solving the Public Diplomacy Puzzle— Developing a 360-Degree Listening and Evaluation Approach to Assess Country Images
    Perspectives Solving the Public Diplomacy Puzzle— Developing a 360-degree Listening and Evaluation Approach to Assess Country Images By Diana Ingenho & Jérôme Chariatte Paper 2, 2020 Solving the Public Diplomacy Puzzle— Developing a 360-Degree Integrated Public Diplomacy Listening and Evaluation Approach to Analyzing what Constitutes a Country Image from Different Perspectives Diana Ingenhoff & Jérôme Chariatte November 2020 Figueroa Press Los Angeles SOLVING THE PUBLIC DIPLOMACY PUZZLE—DEVELOPING A 360-DEGREE INTEGRATED PUBLIC DIPLOMACY LISTENING AND EVALUATION APPROACH TO ANALYZING WHAT CONSTITUTES A COUNTRY IMAGE FROM DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVES by Diana Ingenhoff & Jérôme Chariatte Guest Editor Robert Banks Faculty Fellow, USC Center on Public Diplomacy Published by FIGUEROA PRESS 840 Childs Way, 3rd Floor Los Angeles, CA 90089 Phone: (213) 743-4800 Fax: (213) 743-4804 www.figueroapress.com Figueroa Press is a division of the USC Bookstores Produced by Crestec, Los Angeles, Inc. Printed in the United States of America Notice of Rights Copyright © 2020. All rights reserved. Except for the quotation of short passages for the purposes of criticism and review, no part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system now known or to be invented, without prior written permission from the author, care of Figueroa Press. Notice of Liability The information in this book is distributed on an “As is” basis, without warranty. While every precaution has been taken in the preparation of this book, neither the author nor Figueroa nor the USC University Bookstore shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by any text contained in this book.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyber-Diplomacy
    GLOBAL AFFAIRS, 2017 https://doi.org/10.1080/23340460.2017.1414924 Cyber-diplomacy: the making of an international society in the digital age André Barrinhaa,b and Thomas Renardc,d aDepartment of Politics, Languages and International Studies, University of Bath, Bath, UK; bCentre for Social Studies, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal; cEgmont – Royal Institute for International Relations, Brussels, Belgium; dDepartment of International Affairs, Vesalius College, Brussels, Belgium ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY Cyberspace has become a major locus and focus of international Received 11 July 2017 relations. Most global powers have now streamlined cyber issues Accepted 6 December 2017 into their foreign policies, adopting cyber strategies and KEYWORDS appointing designated diplomats to pursue these strategic Diplomacy; cybersecurity; objectives. This article proposes to explore the concept of cyber- cyber-diplomacy; diplomacy, by analysing its evolution and linking it to the broader international society; foreign discussions of diplomacy as a fundamental institution of policy international society, as defined by the English School of International Relations. It argues that cyber-diplomacy is an emerging international practice that is attempting to construct a cyber-international society, bridging the national interests of states with world society dynamics – the predominant realm in which cyberspace has evolved in the last four decades. By itself, the internet will not usher in a new era of international cooperation. That work is up to us. (Barack Obama, 2011) Introduction Cyber espionage, cyber-attacks, hacktivism, internet censorship and even supposedly tech- nical issues such as net neutrality are now making the headlines on a regular basis. Cyber- space has become a contested political space, shaped by diverging interests, norms and Downloaded by [Mount Allison University Libraries] at 05:24 29 December 2017 values.
    [Show full text]
  • Diplomacy for the 21St Century: Transformational Diplomacy
    Order Code RL34141 Diplomacy for the 21st Century: Transformational Diplomacy August 23, 2007 Kennon H. Nakamura and Susan B. Epstein Foreign Policy Analysts Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Diplomacy for the 21st Century: Transformational Diplomacy Summary Many foreign affairs experts believe that the international system is undergoing a momentous transition affecting its very nature. Some, such as former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, compare the changes in the international system to those of a century ago. Secretary of State Rice relates the changes to the period following the Second World War and the start of the Cold War. At the same time, concerns are being raised about the need for major reform of the institutions and tools of American diplomacy to meet the coming challenges. At issue is how the United States adjusts its diplomacy to address foreign policy demands in the 21st Century. On January 18, 2006, in a speech at Georgetown University in Washington, D.C., Secretary Rice outlined her vision for diplomacy changes that she referred to as “transformational diplomacy” to meet this 21st Century world. The new diplomacy elevates democracy-promotion activities inside countries. According to Secretary Rice in her February 14, 2006 testimony before Senate Foreign Relations Committee, the objective of transformational diplomacy is: “to work with our many partners around the world to build and sustain democratic, well-governed states that will respond to the needs of their people and conduct themselves responsibly in the international system.” Secretary Rice’s announcement included moving people and positions from Washington, D.C., and Europe to “strategic” countries; it also created a new position of Director of Foreign Assistance, modified the tools of diplomacy, and changed U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Strategy for Influence Through Public Diplomacy
    Journal of Strategic Studies ISSN: 0140-2390 (Print) 1743-937X (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/fjss20 Russia’s strategy for influence through public diplomacy and active measures: the Swedish case Martin Kragh & Sebastian Åsberg To cite this article: Martin Kragh & Sebastian Åsberg (2017): Russia’s strategy for influence through public diplomacy and active measures: the Swedish case, Journal of Strategic Studies, DOI: 10.1080/01402390.2016.1273830 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2016.1273830 Published online: 05 Jan 2017. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 32914 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=fjss20 Download by: [Anna Lindh-biblioteket] Date: 21 April 2017, At: 02:48 THE JOURNAL OF STRATEGIC STUDIES, 2017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2016.1273830 Russia’s strategy for influence through public diplomacy and active measures: the Swedish case Martin Kragha,b and Sebastian Åsbergc aHead of Russia and Eurasia Programme, Swedish Institute of International Affairs, Stockholm; bUppsala Centre for Russian and Eurasian Studies, Uppsala University, Sweden; cRussia and Eurasia Studies, Swedish Institute of International Affairs ABSTRACT Russia, as many contemporary states, takes public diplomacy seriously. Since the inception of its English language TV network Russia Today in 2005 (now ‘RT’), the Russian government has broadened its operations to include Sputnik news websites in several languages and social media activities. Moscow, however, has also been accused of engaging in covert influence activities – behaviour historically referred to as ‘active measures’ in the Soviet KGB lexicon on political warfare.
    [Show full text]
  • Chinese Public Diplomacy: the Rise of the Confucius Institute / Falk Hartig
    Chinese Public Diplomacy This book presents the first comprehensive analysis of Confucius Institutes (CIs), situating them as a tool of public diplomacy in the broader context of China’s foreign affairs. The study establishes the concept of public diplomacy as the theoretical framework for analysing CIs. By applying this frame to in- depth case studies of CIs in Europe and Oceania, it provides in-depth knowledge of the structure and organisation of CIs, their activities and audiences, as well as problems, chal- lenges and potentials. In addition to examining CIs as the most prominent and most controversial tool of China’s charm offensive, this book also explains what the structural configuration of these Institutes can tell us about China’s under- standing of and approaches towards public diplomacy. The study demonstrates that, in contrast to their international counterparts, CIs are normally organised as joint ventures between international and Chinese partners in the field of educa- tion or cultural exchange. From this unique setting a more fundamental observa- tion can be made, namely China’s willingness to engage and cooperate with foreigners in the context of public diplomacy. Overall, the author argues that by utilising the current global fascination with Chinese language and culture, the Chinese government has found interested and willing international partners to co- finance the CIs and thus partially fund China’s international charm offensive. This book will be of much interest to students of public diplomacy, Chinese politics, foreign policy and international relations in general. Falk Hartig is a post-doctoral researcher at Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany, and has a PhD in Media & Communication from Queensland Univer- sity of Technology, Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • New Diplomacy and Development
    Volume 3 ecdpm’s Issue 3 March 2014 - GRA TRADE REGIONAL INTE AGRICULTURE ECONOMICS GOVERNANCE New Diplomacy and Development Featuring: Nana Bema Kumi, Former Ambassador of Ghana to the EU Gaspar Frontini and Helge Arends, DEVCO, EC In this issue: Economic Diplomacy and South-South Trade, Peter van Bergeijk How African Countries Need to Get on with the Business of Diplomacy, Huub Ruël New Diplomacy: Showing the Way in a Complex World, Paul Engel WWW.ECDPM.ORG/GREAT Thematic Focus: New Diplomacy and Development Monthly highlights from ECDPM’s In this issue: Weekly Compass Update Features www.ecdpm.org/weeklycompass 4 Ghana’s Challenges in a New 24 Linking TICAD with the EU-Africa Diplomatic Environment Summit to Make Africa a Continent Nana Kumi, Institute of Diplomatic Practice of Real Success and Development Policies (I-2DP) Aiichiro Yamamoto, Friends of Europe. 7 New Diplomacy: Showing the Way in a Complex World? 26 The Catalytic Role of the EU on Paul Engel, ECDPM Private Sector Investments: The Case of Climate Financing 10 Post-2015: New Diplomacy, Ambition Hanne Knaepen, ECDPM and Compromise Dr Gaspar Frontini and Helge Arends, 29 Culture and Diplomacy: Europe’s Directorate General Development & Enabling Power in an Open World Cooperation, EC Damien Helly, ECDPM 14 Economic Diplomacy and South-South Trade: A New Issue in Development Regulars Peter van Bergeijk, Erasmus University 3 Editorial 18 How African Countries Need to Get on with the Business of Diplomacy 32 EPA Update Huub Ruël, Windesheim University 34 Monthly Highlights from the 21 Beyond Development Diplomacy: Talking Points Blog Ministerial Diversity and International Cooperation 35 Weekly Compass Highlights Erik Lundsgaarde, German Development Institute (DIE) 36 Latest ECDPM Publications 2 Editorial Colophon Governance, Regional integra- Contrary to its traditional image, international diplomacy is a dynamic field.
    [Show full text]
  • Communicating 21St Century Statecraft Evaluating the Paradigm
    COMMUNICATING 21ST CENTURY STATECRAFT: EVALUATING THE PARADIGM SHIFT ARGUMENT A Thesis by JACQUELYN NICOLE CHINN Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS August 2011 Major Subject: Communication Communicating 21st Century Statecraft: Evaluating the Paradigm Shift Argument Copyright 2011 Jacquelyn Nicole Chinn COMMUNICATING 21ST CENTURY STATECRAFT: EVALUATING THE PARADIGM SHIFT ARGUMENT A Thesis by JACQUELYN NICOLE CHINN Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Approved by: Chair of Committee, Joshua B. Barbour Committee Members, Alan R. Kluver Larry Napper Head of Department, Richard Street August 2011 Major Subject: Communication iii ABSTRACT Communicating 21st Century Statecraft: Evaluating the Paradigm Shift Argument. (August 2011) Jacquelyn Nicole Chinn, B.A., Texas A&M University Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Joshua B. Barbour This project examines how social media is being used by individuals within the State Department engaged in public diplomacy and how the use of these technologies may or may not represent a paradigm shift in diplomatic operation. Assessments of social media and government in popular culture argue a fundamental shift has taken place in government operations. Yet this argument calls for theoretical examination using communication theory and via examination of organizational praxis. Using Ammon‘s criterion for paradigm shift in communications technology and diplomacy, I evaluated State‘s current program of social media and public diplomacy called 21st Century Statecraft. I conducted a content analysis of organizational Twitter feeds and also interviewed actors within the organization working with public diplomacy and social media.
    [Show full text]