DOCSLIB.ORG

Download (2MB)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download (2MB) A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Harper Adams University Copyright and moral rights for this thesis and, where applicable, any accompanying data are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis and the accompanying data cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content of the thesis and accompanying research data (where applicable) must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holder/s. When referring to this thesis and any accompanying data, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. HARPER ADAMS UNIVERSITY IMPROVING BIOLOGICAL CONTROL IN PROTECTED CROPS Aidan D. Thomas A THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY NOVEMBER 2020 Harper Adams University Abstract Management of the leafhopper Hauptidia maroccana is inadequate. Despite not being a regular pest in glasshouses, H. maroccana is capable of significant damage. Current conrol methods rely on one chemical agent (Indoxacarb) and a putative predator. In the face of widespread chemical resistance and unreliability of generalist predators, the risk to growers under these conditions is increased. Part of the problem facing growers is that only very basic information about this pest is known, with few studies on the ecological interactions that will be vital for suffifcient control. It is these knowledge gaps that this thesis addresses. A summary literature review introduces the main topics of study and examines the failure of a previously attempted biological control agent. Chapter 2 builds on evidence from similar species and looks at improving trapping of the pest in glasshouses. Non-yellow traps are tested for efficacy and selectivity under laboratory conditions, and indicate that there is scope for improvement in this area. The visual ecology of this pest is examined again in Chapter 4 where the use of LED technology to increase the visual signal of traps is examined. The results of which again indicate that there is more complexity to the visual cues evaluated by H. maroccana than the consensus implies. The importance of plant volatiles to herbivores is well studied. For H. maroccana however, much is not known. Of particular importance is the ability of this pest to detect and respond to the volatile blends released by plants under attack by conspecifics. Growers have reported that H. maroccana forms hotspots within crops. Whether this is due to aggregation or a lack of migration is unknown. Information from experiments here suggests that it is largely due to lack of emigration rather than aggregative behaviours. The use of the generalist predator Macrolophus caliginosus for control of leafhopper is critically examined and tested under laboratory conditions. The overall picture is mixed with predation of leafhopper nymphs approaching levels of consumption seen for other pests, but predation on adults being almost zero. Furthermore, the response of Macrolophus to plant volatiles from infested plants was mixed, which may indicate that under a more complex environment, the ability of this predator to locate H. maroccana is reduced. In the final chapter the project is reviewed as a whole against the objectives and summarised. 1 Acknowledgements The production of this thesis would not have been possible without the funding provided by BBSRC and AHDB. From AHDB, particular thanks are extended to Georgina Key and Joe Martin. Guidance and industry consultation was provided generously by Vitacress Herbs and Cantelo Nurseries. Within those companies support was gratefully received from Simon Budge and Neal Ward respectively. The project took place on Harper Adams University sites and thanks are extended to the staff and fellow students of that place for assistance, advice and companionship. There are people who have contributed greatly to the project and to my own personal wellbeing during this time. These people are too many to list in completion, so to avoid leaving anyone out, the list will remain unstated. Above and beyond all others are my supervisory team, Dr Tom Pope, and Professor Simon Leather. For these gentlemen I was probably one student among others, but for me they were in a league of their own. Finally, the confidence to undertake this work in the first place was hard to find, and harder still to maintain. At any point when my stores were running low, I knew I could turn to my family. To Michelle, Hefin and Bryce, an unpayable debt is owed. But that’s what family is for, right? Per Ardua, mutatio. 2 Table of contents Abstract .......................................................................................................................... 1 Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................ 2 Table of contents ............................................................................................................ 3 List of figures in text ....................................................................................................... 7 List of tables in text ........................................................................................................ 8 1 Literature review...................................................................................................... 9 1.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 9 1.2 Insect-Plant interactions ................................................................................. 10 1.2.1 Herbivory ................................................................................................ 10 1.2.2 Plant defences ........................................................................................ 11 1.2.3 Insect responses to plant volatiles ........................................................... 14 1.3 Insect colour vision ......................................................................................... 16 1.4 Leafhoppers ................................................................................................... 18 1.4.1 Hauptidia maroccana .............................................................................. 20 1.4.2 Pest status and controls .......................................................................... 21 1.5 Family Mymaridae .......................................................................................... 22 1.5.1 Genus Anagrus ....................................................................................... 23 1.5.2 Anagrus atomus ...................................................................................... 25 1.5.2.1 Biology ................................................................................................ 25 1.5.2.2 As a biocontrol agent ........................................................................... 25 1.6 Macrolophus spp. ........................................................................................... 27 1.6.1 Taxonomic status .................................................................................... 27 1.6.2 As a biocontrol agent .............................................................................. 28 1.7 Summary ....................................................................................................... 29 1.8 Aims of the thesis ........................................................................................... 30 1.8.1 Objectives ............................................................................................... 30 2 Non-yellow traps for glasshouse leafhopper monitoring; evidence for effective alternative colours ........................................................................................................ 31 2.1 Abstract .......................................................................................................... 31 3 2.2 Introduction .................................................................................................... 31 2.3 Materials and Methods ................................................................................... 33 2.3.1 Leafhopper cultures ................................................................................ 33 2.3.2 Sticky traps ............................................................................................. 33 2.3.3 Custom traps .......................................................................................... 34 2.3.4 Gold traps ............................................................................................... 34 2.4 Colour choice ................................................................................................. 35 2.5 Colour evaluation ........................................................................................... 36 2.6 Statistical tests ............................................................................................... 37 2.7 Results .......................................................................................................... 38 2.8 Discussion ..................................................................................................... 40 2.9 Conclusion ....................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dorothy J. Jackson FRES FLS, Scottish Entomologist: a Bibliography Jack R
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Biology and Ecology Faculty Scholarship School of Biology and Ecology 10-2018 Dorothy J. Jackson FRES FLS, Scottish Entomologist: A Bibliography Jack R. McLachlan UMaine, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/bio_facpub Part of the Entomology Commons, and the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine Commons Repository Citation McLachlan, JR (2018) Dorothy J. Jackson FRES FLS, Scottish entomologist: a bibliography. Latissimus 42: 10-13 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biology and Ecology Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ISSN 0966 2235 LATISSIMUS NEWSLETTER OF THE BALFOUR-BROWNE CLUB Number Forty Two October 2018 October 2018 LATISSIMUS 42 10 DOROTHY J. JACKSON FRES FLS, SCOTTISH ENTOMOLOGIST: A BIBLIOGRAPHY Jack R. McLachlan Dorothy Jean Jackson FRES FLS (1892-1973) should be familiar to anyone interested in water beetles. She published prolifically on the ecology, distribution, flight capacity, and parasites of water beetles, and made especially important contributions to our knowledge of dytiscids. Lees (1974) provided a very brief and somewhat accurate obituary. I am currently preparing a more comprehensive biography of her and would be grateful to receive any notes or anecdotes from those that knew or met her. Foster (1991), at the request of the late Hans Schaeflein, was the first effort in putting together a publication list. Here I provide a more extensive bibliography of her work that is almost certainly incomplete, but I think includes most of her scientific output between 1907 and 1973.
    [Show full text]
  • Classical Biological Control of Arthropods in Australia
    Classical Biological Contents Control of Arthropods Arthropod index in Australia General index List of targets D.F. Waterhouse D.P.A. Sands CSIRo Entomology Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research Canberra 2001 Back Forward Contents Arthropod index General index List of targets The Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) was established in June 1982 by an Act of the Australian Parliament. Its primary mandate is to help identify agricultural problems in developing countries and to commission collaborative research between Australian and developing country researchers in fields where Australia has special competence. Where trade names are used this constitutes neither endorsement of nor discrimination against any product by the Centre. ACIAR MONOGRAPH SERIES This peer-reviewed series contains the results of original research supported by ACIAR, or material deemed relevant to ACIAR’s research objectives. The series is distributed internationally, with an emphasis on the Third World. © Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, GPO Box 1571, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia Waterhouse, D.F. and Sands, D.P.A. 2001. Classical biological control of arthropods in Australia. ACIAR Monograph No. 77, 560 pages. ISBN 0 642 45709 3 (print) ISBN 0 642 45710 7 (electronic) Published in association with CSIRO Entomology (Canberra) and CSIRO Publishing (Melbourne) Scientific editing by Dr Mary Webb, Arawang Editorial, Canberra Design and typesetting by ClarusDesign, Canberra Printed by Brown Prior Anderson, Melbourne Cover: An ichneumonid parasitoid Megarhyssa nortoni ovipositing on a larva of sirex wood wasp, Sirex noctilio. Back Forward Contents Arthropod index General index Foreword List of targets WHEN THE CSIR Division of Economic Entomology, now Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Entomology, was established in 1928, classical biological control was given as one of its core activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Ooctonus Vulgatus[I] (Hymenoptera, Mymaridae), A
    A peer-reviewed version of this preprint was published in PeerJ on 24 March 2020. View the peer-reviewed version (peerj.com/articles/8591), which is the preferred citable publication unless you specifically need to cite this preprint. Mesmin X, Chartois M, Genson G, Rossi J, Cruaud A, Rasplus J. 2020. Ooctonus vulgatus (Hymenoptera, Mymaridae), a potential biocontrol agent to reduce populations of Philaenus spumarius (Hemiptera, Aphrophoridae) the main vector of Xylella fastidiosa in Europe. PeerJ 8:e8591 https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8591 Ooctonus vulgatus (Hymenoptera, Mymaridae), a potential biocontrol agent to reduce populations of Philaenus spumarius (Hemiptera, Aphrophoridae) the main vector of Xylella fastidiosa in Europe Xavier Mesmin 1, 2 , Marguerite Chartois 2 , Guenaelle Genson 2 , Jean-Pierre Rossi 2 , Astrid Cruaud 2 , Jean-Yves Rasplus Corresp. 2 1 AGAP, INRA, CIRAD, Montpellier SupAgro, Univ Montpellier, INRA, San Giuliano, France 2 CBGP, INRA, CIRAD, IRD, Montpellier SupAgro, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France Corresponding Author: Jean-Yves Rasplus Email address: [email protected] As vector of Xylella fastidiosa (Wells, 1987) in Europe, the meadow spittlebug, Philaenus spumarius (Linnaeus, 1758) (Hemiptera: Aphrophoridae) is a species of major concern. Therefore, tools and agents to control this ubiquitous insect that develops and feeds on hundreds of plant species are wanted. We conducted a field survey of P. spumarius eggs in Corsica and provide a first report of Ooctonus vulgatus Haliday, 1833 (Hymenoptera, Mymaridae) as a potential biocontrol agent of P. spumarius in Europe. To allow species identification, we summarized the main characters distinguishing O. vulgatus from other European species of Ooctonus and generated COI DNA barcodes.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter of the Pineapple Working Group, International Society for Horticultural Science ______Issue No
    Newsletter of the Pineapple Working Group, International Society for Horticultural Science _______________________________ Issue No. 19, June, 2012_______________________________ Table of Contents Pineapple Working Group News.............................................................................................................................2 From the Editor.................................................................................................................................................. 2 Tropical Fruits Network................................................................................................................................... 4 Proceedings of the 7th International Pineapple Symposium......................................................................... 4 News from Australia.................................................................................................................................................5 8 th International Pineapple Symposium......................................................................................................... 5 News from Benin...................................................................................................................................................... 6 Introduction to Pineapple Industry in Benin...............................................................................................6 News from Brazil.....................................................................................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL REPORT 2020 Plant Protection & Conservation Programs
    Oregon Department of Agriculture Plant Protection & Conservation Programs ANNUAL REPORT 2020 www.oregon.gov/ODA Plant Protection & Conservation Programs Phone: 503-986-4636 Website: www.oregon.gov/ODA Find this report online: https://oda.direct/PlantAnnualReport Publication date: March 2021 Table Tableof Contents of Contents ADMINISTRATION—4 Director’s View . 4 Retirements: . 6 Plant Protection and Conservation Programs Staff . 9 NURSERY AND CHRISTMAS TREE—10 What Do We Do? . 10 Christmas Tree Shipping Season Summary . 16 Personnel Updates . .11 Program Overview . 16 2020: A Year of Challenge . .11 New Rule . 16 Hawaii . 17 COVID Response . 12 Mexico . 17 Funding Sources . 13 Nursery Research Assessment Fund . 14 IPPM-Nursery Surveys . 17 Phytophthora ramorum Nursery Program . 14 National Traceback Investigation: Ralstonia in Oregon Nurseries . 18 Western Horticultural Inspection Society (WHIS) Annual Meeting . 19 HEMP—20 2020 Program Highlights . 20 2020 Hemp Inspection Annual Report . 21 2020 Hemp Rule-making . 21 Table 1: ODA Hemp Violations . 23 Hemp Testing . .24 INSECT PEST PREVENTION & MANAGEMENT—25 A Year of Personnel Changes-Retirements-Promotions High-Tech Sites Survey . .33 . 26 Early Detection and Rapid Response for Exotic Bark Retirements . 27 and Ambrosia Beetles . 33 My Unexpected Career With ODA . .28 Xyleborus monographus Early Detection and Rapid Response (EDRR) Trapping . 34 2020 Program Notes . .29 Outreach and Education . 29 Granulate Ambrosia Beetle and Other Wood Boring Insects Associated with Creosoting Plants . 34 New Detections . .29 Japanese Beetle Program . .29 Apple Maggot Program . .35 Exotic Fruit Fly Survey . .35 2018 Program Highlights . .29 Japanese Beetle Eradication . .30 Grasshopper and Mormon Cricket Program . .35 Grasshopper Outbreak Response – Harney County .
    [Show full text]
  • The Leafhoppers of Minnesota
    Technical Bulletin 155 June 1942 The Leafhoppers of Minnesota Homoptera: Cicadellidae JOHN T. MEDLER Division of Entomology and Economic Zoology University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station The Leafhoppers of Minnesota Homoptera: Cicadellidae JOHN T. MEDLER Division of Entomology and Economic Zoology University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station Accepted for publication June 19, 1942 CONTENTS Page Introduction 3 Acknowledgments 3 Sources of material 4 Systematic treatment 4 Eurymelinae 6 Macropsinae 12 Agalliinae 22 Bythoscopinae 25 Penthimiinae 26 Gyponinae 26 Ledrinae 31 Amblycephalinae 31 Evacanthinae 37 Aphrodinae 38 Dorydiinae 40 Jassinae 43 Athysaninae 43 Balcluthinae 120 Cicadellinae 122 Literature cited 163 Plates 171 Index of plant names 190 Index of leafhopper names 190 2M-6-42 The Leafhoppers of Minnesota John T. Medler INTRODUCTION HIS bulletin attempts to present as accurate and complete a T guide to the leafhoppers of Minnesota as possible within the limits of the material available for study. It is realized that cer- tain groups could not be treated completely because of the lack of available material. Nevertheless, it is hoped that in its present form this treatise will serve as a convenient and useful manual for the systematic and economic worker concerned with the forms of the upper Mississippi Valley. In all cases a reference to the original description of the species and genus is given. Keys are included for the separation of species, genera, and supergeneric groups. In addition to the keys a brief diagnostic description of the important characters of each species is given. Extended descriptions or long lists of references have been omitted since citations to this literature are available from other sources if ac- tually needed (Van Duzee, 1917).
    [Show full text]
  • Study on Population Dynamic of Cotton Green Leafhopper, Asymmetrasca Decedens (Paoli) in the Cotton Fields of Golestan Province
    Journal of Novel Applied Sciences Available online at www.jnasci.org ©2019 JNAS Journal-2019-8-7/155-158 ISSN 2322-5149 ©2019 JNAS Study on population dynamic of cotton green leafhopper, Asymmetrasca decedens (Paoli) in the cotton fields of Golestan province Mojeni, T. D Cotton Research Institute of Iran, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Gorgan, Iran Corresponding author: Mojeni, T. D ABSTRACT: Leaf hoppers are important pests of crops including cotton. This research was carried out during 2014- 2015 to identify the main leaf hopper species collected in the cotton fields of Golestan province and to study population of cotton green leafhoppers dominant ones. The specimen were collected and brought to the laboratory. The results revealed that following the species had the highest population in cotton fields:1- Asymmetrasca decedens (Paoli,1932). 2- Psammotettix alienus (Dahlbom, 1851).3- Emposca decipiens (Paoli, 1930). 4- Jacobiasca lybica (Bergevin & Zanon, 1922). A. decedens was determined as dominant species. The peak of activity this insect was late in June to late in August in the cotton feilds. The biological characteristics of A. decedens were stuied in the laboratory condition (24 ±1 °C. and 75 ± 5 % R.H) 25 – 35 days with egg incubation period of 7 – 9 days and nymphal duration of 10 – 15 days. The longevity of adults was 8- 11 days. This pest had 5-6 generation per year and over wintered as adult under weeds. The main important cultivated host plants of this pest are cotton, potato, faba bean, rapeseed, soybean and cucurbit and its wild hosts are black night shade, pigweed, mallow and goose weeds.
    [Show full text]
  • Winged Sharpshooter
    REPRODUCTIVE AND DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY OF GONATOCERUS ASHMEADI, AN EGG PARASITOID OF THE GLASSY-WINGED SHARPSHOOTER Project leader: Cooperator: Mark Hoddle Leigh Pilkington Dept. of Entomology Dept. of Entomology University of California University of California Riverside, CA 92521 Riverside, CA 92521 Reporting period: The results reported here are from work conducted from April 2004 to October 2004. ABSTRACT The reproductive and developmental biology of Gonatocerus ashmeadi Girault, a self-introduced parasitoid of the glassy- winged sharpshooter (GWSS) Homalodisca coagulata Say, was determined at five constant temperatures in the laboratory; 15; 20; 25; 30; and 33°C. Wasps at each experimental temperature were given, on average, between 10 and 15 GWSS eggs per day for its natural life for oviposition. At 30°C, immature G. ashmeadi sustained the highest mortality rates as adult emergence was lowest at this temperature. The largest proportion of female offspring was produced at 25°C and lifetime fecundity was greatest at 25°C. The development time was greatest at 15°C and lowest at 30°C. Mean adult longevity was inversely related to temperature with a maximum of approximately 30 days at 15°C to a minimum of approximately two days at 33°C. INTRODUCTION The mymarid wasp species Gonatocerus ashmeadi Girault, G. triguttatus Girault, G. morrilli Howard, and G. fasciatus Girault are the most common natural enemies associated with the insect pest Homalodisca coagulata in it’s home range of southeastern USA and northeastern Mexico (Triapitsyn and Phillips, 2000). The wasp G. ashmeadi is a self-introduced resident of California and most likely came into the state in parasitized Homalodisca coagulata eggs (Vickerman et al., 2004) and has established widely in association with H.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultivars to Infestation with Certain Piercing Sucking Insect Pests Darwish, A
    J. Plant Prot. and Path., Mansoura Univ., Vol.9 (12): 849 – 853, 2018 Variations in the Susceptibility of some Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Cultivars to Infestation with Certain Piercing Sucking Insect Pests Darwish, A. A. E. Plant Protection Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Damanhour University, Egypt [email protected] ABSTRACT Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) is an economically important vegetable crop all over the world. The piercing sucking insect pests are serious pests threatening potato plantations in many countries. The present investigation contributes to the knowledge in the susceptibility of certain potato cultivars to infestation with these insects in Beheira Governorate, Egypt. Five global potato cultivars currently used in Egypt’s potato production were evaluated through two successive seasons (summer plantations) in field experiments for their susceptibility to sucking insect infestation. The experiment was designed in a completely randomized block design and all data were analyzed using the SAS® program. None of the tested potato cultivars was immune or highly resistant to the tested insect pests. The cultivars Banba and Diamante were found quite resistance to piercing sucking insect pests. The cultivar Herms was found as moderately susceptible while Spunta and Cara were found to be the most susceptible cultivars. The green lacewing, Chrysoperla carnea; seven-spotted lady beetle, Coccinella septempunctata; eleven spotted lady beetle, Coccinella undecimpunctata and the pirate bug, Orius sp are the most important predators which associated with the sucking insects pests on the potato cultivars. Keywords: Potato, Sucking insect pests, Aphids, Thrips, whitefly, Natural enemies. INTRODUCTION existence of beneficial insect species that associated with the potato piercing sucking insect pest populations The potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) is the third most important world crop, after rice, and wheat (Visser, et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology of Empoasca Decipiens Paoli on Cotton and Faba Bean Plants
    Middle East Journal of Agriculture Volume : 04 | Issue : 03 | July-Sept. | 2015 Research Pages: 503-508 ISSN 2077-4605 Biology of Empoasca decipiens Paoli on Cotton and Faba Bean Plants Khalafallah, E.M.E., M.A. Khattab and E.A.EL-Srand Piercing-Sucking Insect Research Department, Plant Protection Research Institute, ARC, Egypt. ABSTRACT The development of efficient integrated insect management strategy necessitates more information on the insect biology on the different host plants. Therefore, biological parameters of Empoasca decipiens Paoli were studied on faba bean, Vicia faba L. and cotton, Gossypium barbadense L under semi-natural conditions inside wire breeding chamber at Sakha Agricultural Research Station, Kafr El-Sheikh, Egypt. The results showed higher number of laid eggs/ female and emerged nymphs of E. decipiens on faba bean than cotton. Also, the highest number of eggs was laid in cotyledons of cotton and in leaves of faba bean. The duration of nymphal instars was significantly shorter on faba bean. The mortality during the nymphs period was lower on faba bean than on cotton and it was only recorded during the early instars. The longevity of male and female was longer on faba bean than on cotton without significant difference and male lived shorter than female on the two hosts. Life span of female was longer than male and they were shorter on faba bean than on cotton without significant difference. Finally, it can be concluded that faba bean was more preferred host to E. decipiens than cotton under semi-natural conditions. Thus, the results are important in developing an efficient integrated management of E.
    [Show full text]
  • ARTHROPODA Subphylum Hexapoda Protura, Springtails, Diplura, and Insects
    NINE Phylum ARTHROPODA SUBPHYLUM HEXAPODA Protura, springtails, Diplura, and insects ROD P. MACFARLANE, PETER A. MADDISON, IAN G. ANDREW, JOCELYN A. BERRY, PETER M. JOHNS, ROBERT J. B. HOARE, MARIE-CLAUDE LARIVIÈRE, PENELOPE GREENSLADE, ROSA C. HENDERSON, COURTenaY N. SMITHERS, RicarDO L. PALMA, JOHN B. WARD, ROBERT L. C. PILGRIM, DaVID R. TOWNS, IAN McLELLAN, DAVID A. J. TEULON, TERRY R. HITCHINGS, VICTOR F. EASTOP, NICHOLAS A. MARTIN, MURRAY J. FLETCHER, MARLON A. W. STUFKENS, PAMELA J. DALE, Daniel BURCKHARDT, THOMAS R. BUCKLEY, STEVEN A. TREWICK defining feature of the Hexapoda, as the name suggests, is six legs. Also, the body comprises a head, thorax, and abdomen. The number A of abdominal segments varies, however; there are only six in the Collembola (springtails), 9–12 in the Protura, and 10 in the Diplura, whereas in all other hexapods there are strictly 11. Insects are now regarded as comprising only those hexapods with 11 abdominal segments. Whereas crustaceans are the dominant group of arthropods in the sea, hexapods prevail on land, in numbers and biomass. Altogether, the Hexapoda constitutes the most diverse group of animals – the estimated number of described species worldwide is just over 900,000, with the beetles (order Coleoptera) comprising more than a third of these. Today, the Hexapoda is considered to contain four classes – the Insecta, and the Protura, Collembola, and Diplura. The latter three classes were formerly allied with the insect orders Archaeognatha (jumping bristletails) and Thysanura (silverfish) as the insect subclass Apterygota (‘wingless’). The Apterygota is now regarded as an artificial assemblage (Bitsch & Bitsch 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • The Leafhopper Vectors of Phytopathogenic Viruses (Homoptera, Cicadellidae) Taxonomy, Biology, and Virus Transmission
    /«' THE LEAFHOPPER VECTORS OF PHYTOPATHOGENIC VIRUSES (HOMOPTERA, CICADELLIDAE) TAXONOMY, BIOLOGY, AND VIRUS TRANSMISSION Technical Bulletin No. 1382 Agricultural Research Service UMTED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many individuals gave valuable assistance in the preparation of this work, for which I am deeply grateful. I am especially indebted to Miss Julianne Rolfe for dissecting and preparing numerous specimens for study and for recording data from the literature on the subject matter. Sincere appreciation is expressed to James P. Kramer, U.S. National Museum, Washington, D.C., for providing the bulk of material for study, for allowing access to type speci- mens, and for many helpful suggestions. I am also grateful to William J. Knight, British Museum (Natural History), London, for loan of valuable specimens, for comparing type material, and for giving much useful information regarding the taxonomy of many important species. I am also grateful to the following persons who allowed me to examine and study type specimens: René Beique, Laval Univer- sity, Ste. Foy, Quebec; George W. Byers, University of Kansas, Lawrence; Dwight M. DeLong and Paul H. Freytag, Ohio State University, Columbus; Jean L. LaiFoon, Iowa State University, Ames; and S. L. Tuxen, Universitetets Zoologiske Museum, Co- penhagen, Denmark. To the following individuals who provided additional valuable material for study, I give my sincere thanks: E. W. Anthon, Tree Fruit Experiment Station, Wenatchee, Wash.; L. M. Black, Uni- versity of Illinois, Urbana; W. E. China, British Museum (Natu- ral History), London; L. N. Chiykowski, Canada Department of Agriculture, Ottawa ; G. H. L. Dicker, East Mailing Research Sta- tion, Kent, England; J.
    [Show full text]