DOCSLIB.ORG

Upper Yampa River Watershed Plan Executive Summary May 2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Upper Yampa River Watershed Plan Executive Summary May 2016 Upper Yampa River Watershed Plan Protecting and Managing Long Term Health A Collaboration of the Upper Yampa Technical Committee, Watershed Group and Constituents Lead Author: Lyn Halliday, Environmental Solutions Unltd, LLC Steamboat Springs, Colorado Upper Yampa River Watershed Plan Executive Summary May 2016 Upper Yampa River Watershed Plan Executive Summary May 2016 Upper Yampa River Watershed Plan - Protecting and Managing Long Term Health Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Chapter 1. Overview Chapter 2. Understanding Existing and Potential Water Quality Issues in the UYRW Chapter 3. Overarching Goals and Objectives Chapter 4. Watershed-wide Known and Potential Stressors and Solutions to Water Quality Threats Chapter 5. Assessing Watershed-wide Data Gaps Chapter 6. Sub-basin Water Quality Classifications and Identified Water Quality Concerns Chapter 7. Action Plan and Matrix by Objective Chapter 8. Outreach and Education Chapter 9. Ongoing Water Quality Monitoring Commonly Used Abbreviations Appendices A. Upper Yampa State of the Watershed Report 2014 B. Best Management Practices for Fisheries C. Best Management Practices for Riparian Areas D. Best Management Practices – Land Management a. Tier 1 Examples – Non-Point Source Runoff Upper Yampa River Watershed Plan Executive Summary May 2016 Upper Yampa River Watershed Plan Protecting and Managing Long Term Health May 2016 Executive Summary What The Upper Yampa River Watershed Plan (WP) is the culmination of decades of collaborative efforts to protect and enhance the health of the Upper Yampa River Watershed (UYRW). The Upper Yampa Watershed Group (UYRWG) initiated the development of the Plan in 2013 and is committed to maintaining and improving the physical, chemical, and biological health of the upper Yampa River and its tributaries. By creating a non-regulatory watershed plan, the UYRWG hopes to increase local partnerships and their capacity to protect and enhance water quality, promote water conservation, and sustain and improve the present health of the watershed. A watershed is an area of land from which all water drains to a common point, a hydrologic system within which all living things are inextricably linked. Watershed health is influenced by both natural processes and human activities and is important for drinking water, agriculture, recreation, and ecological integrity. As water moves through a watershed the surface and sub-surface conditions affect the quality of water. The UYRW planning area is approximately 1,800 square miles and extends from the headwaters of the Yampa River to the confluence of, and including, Elkhead Creek (figure below). The Yampa River is a snow-melt dominated river system which is typical of drainage basins located at high elevations where a majority of annual precipitation occurs as snow in winter months then melts and runs off over a relatively short time period in spring and early summer. Upper Yampa River Watershed Plan Executive Summary May 2016 Upper Yampa River Watershed Plan Executive Summary May 2016 Upper Yampa River Watershed Plan 2016 Accordingly, flows vary considerably across seasons. The river carries tons of sediment over its sand, gravel and cobble beds before its confluence with the Green River in Dinosaur National Monument. The system supports consumptive (municipal, agricultural, industrial) and non-consumptive (environmental, recreational) uses. The continued tradition of agricultural flood irrigation augments groundwater aquifers and creates wetlands which can assist with late season return flows to the river. The primary focus of the WP is on preventing water quality degradation through the implementation of improved practices relative to non-point sources of contamination entering waterways through stormwater run-off. Riparian area protection and restoration; improving watershed connectivity; and maintaining the ecological balance of riparian, wetland, upland & aquatic biota are also priorities. Why Although water quality in the UYRW is generally good, current water quality data indicate trends that warrant continuous monitoring. Thus, the WP identifies needs for watershed health protection going forward. These include encouraging the use of management practices that address ecosystem function, surrounding land use, and the ability of the river system to support the demand of the local communities. For community members and water users to fully comprehend the Yampa River system and the aquatic ecosystem, water quality and quantity must be considered holistically. An approved WP opens the door for potential funding to implement well-thought- out projects in the future. How Maps were created to aid in the understanding of features and influences on water quality both on a watershed scale and at the sub-basin level. Impaired stream segment information from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) was further analyzed. Using both vetted water quality monitoring data and watershed health indicators, each of the five sub-basins was assessed resulting in the creation of “snapshots” of each. Results are outlined below. Trends of concern watershed-wide include: • increases in sediment loading; • riparian area degradation; and • non-native species encroachment. Bear River Sub-basin - Outstanding Waters / Anti-degradation designated streams • Normal seasonal bedload alterations in main stem of Yampa below the Catamount dam causing sediment issues between Lake Catamount and Chuck Lewis State Wildlife Area • Erosion from livestock grazing practices • Forest fires having the potential to threaten water supplies and water quality • Contaminated runoff from historic mining-related runoff Environmental Solutions Unltd, LLC / Upper Yampa River Watershed Group 6 Upper Yampa River Watershed Plan 2016 • Elevated zinc & dissolved iron in Little Morrison Creek (some natural some human- induced) • Yampa River below Stagecoach Reservoir – elevated selenium & manganese (some natural some human-induced) • Elevated temperature (M&E list - drought years) • Mercury in fish tissue at Stagecoach and Catamount Reservoirs • Elevated nutrient concentrations in Stagecoach Reservoir and Lake Catamount resulting in accelerated eutrophication • Blue green algae blooms Walton Creek/Fish Creek Sub-basin – smallest area with largest population center • Elevated temperatures and low dissolved oxygen levels (drought years) (M&E List) • Elevated Manganese • Loss of wetlands which are necessary to filter stormwater as well as provide infiltration to groundwater • Urban stormwater runoff carrying contaminants and potentially increasing temperature from impervious surface runoff Elk River Sub-basin – largest tributary / some Outstanding Waters /Anti-degradation designated streams • High readings of E. Coli • Elevated Mercury - 303 (d) List • Added bedload resulting from both several years of record spring runoff as well as poorly designed river channel restoration projects • Willow Creek/Steamboat Lake outlet • Damage from in-stream structures Middle Yampa River - Trout Creek/Dry Creek Sub-basins • Elevated Phosphorus • Elevated suspended sediment potentially a result of degradation of riparian areas from unmanaged cattle grazing on leased lands • One Dry Creek segment on 303 (d) List for exceedance of agricultural and aquatic life standards, Iron, and Selenium • Sage Creek 303 (d) List for exceeding aquatic life standard for Iron • Erosion caused by reduced ground cover (noxious weeds, overgrazing) • Degraded stream banks and eroded channels (Morgan Bottom area) Elkhead River Sub-basin – USFS Special Interest Area • Fish tissue Mercury in Elkhead reservoir– (303 (d) List) • Elevated temperatures due to erosion-caused wide shallow exposed channels and deep vertical mass wasting banks. Environmental Solutions Unltd, LLC / Upper Yampa River Watershed Group 7 Upper Yampa River Watershed Plan 2016 Following the identification of water quality trends and concerns, an analysis of potential sources or “stressors” was developed for the WP. These included both immediate and long term issues as they relate to the health of the watershed. As part of this analysis, impacts, impairments and possible solutions have been outlined. Assessment of data gaps and further evaluation of each sub-basin followed, culminating in the development of a detailed Action Plan. Finally, a list of potential projects was developed and prioritized. Potential Project List 2016 Priority (in no particular order) • Hire Watershed Coordinator • Develop a BMP toolbox tailored to the UYRW and create related website • Steamboat Lake / Willow Creek pollutant assessment & mitigation • Elk River sub-basin comprehensive study/plan • Headgate improvements education/mitigation • Morgan Bottom Irrigation Delivery & Habitat Improvement • Stagecoach nutrient management and algal study • Steamboat Springs Stream Management and Target Flows Study • CDOT Sediment Plan Implementation • Native Plant Nursery • Riparian restoration priorities: o Oak Creek o Need rapid assessment stream segment strategy in other areas • Elkhead Riparian improvements and noxious weed management • Trout Creek/Fish Creek, Foidel Creek Riparian Fencing and Noxious Weed Management • Oak Creek Stormwater Management • Outreach & Education Secondary • Nutrient and sediment loading modeling • Riparian health assessments – implementation plans including Adopt a Stream • Critical wetlands identification & mapping – protection implementation • 303(d) list segment sampling – Triennial review participation • Butcherknife
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FS Region 2 Snowmobile Trespass Strategy
    Rocky Mountain Region Information and Education Strategy For The Prevention of Snowmobile Trespass In Wilderness Third Edition January 2004 - -1 Table of Contents Page I. Problem Statement 1 II. Current Situation 1 III. Current Direction 3 IV. Implementation and Responsibilities 3 V. Monitoring and Reporting 4 VI. Using the Appendices and Tool Kit 4 VII. Appendices A. Excerpts from the Wilderness Act of 1964 6 B. Selected References from the Code of Federal Regulations 7 C. Selected References from Forest Service Manual 2320 8 D. Patrol Ideas 11 E. Potential Cooperators/Contacts for Reaching Local Users 13 F. Potential Cooperators/Contacts for Reaching Non-local Users 15 G. In-house I&E Ideas 17 H. Suggested Actions for Dealing With Intentional Trespass 18 I. Tool and Techniques - Law Enforcement and the “Authority Of The Resource" 19 J. What Harm Is There in Operating My Snowmobile in Wilderness? 25 K. Why is Wilderness Closed to Motorized and Mechanical Travel? 26 L. State Registration Agencies, State Snowmobile Associations and Snowmobile Clubs 27 M. Annual Monitoring Report 35 VIII. Tool Kit 38 1 - -1 I. Problem Statement The Wilderness Act of 1964 first created Congressionally designated wilderness. The Act stated that "In order to assure that an increasing population, accompanied by expanding settlement and growing mechanization, does not occupy and modify all areas within the United States ... it is hereby declared to be the policy of Congress to secure for the American people of present and future generations the benefits of an enduring resource of wilderness". The Act defined wilderness as having outstanding opportunities for solitude or a primitive and unconfined type of recreation.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation of Flaming Gorge Dam Final Environmental Impact Statement
    Record of Decision Operation of Flaming Gorge Dam Final Environmental Impact Statement I. Summary of Action and Background The Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) has completed a final environmental impact statement (EIS) on the operation of Flaming Gorge Dam. The EIS describes the potential effects of modifying the operation of Flaming Gorge Dam to assist in the recovery of four endangered fish, and their critical habitat, downstream from the dam. The four endangered fish species are Colorado pikeminnow (Ptychocheilus lucius), humpback chub (Gila cypha), razorback sucker (Xyrauchen texanus), and bonytail (Gila elegans). Reclamation would implement the proposed action by modifying the operations of Flaming Gorge Dam, to the extent possible, to achieve the flows and temperatures recommended by participants of the Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program (Recovery Program). Reclamation’s goal is to implement the proposed action and, at the same time, maintain and continue all authorized purposes of the Colorado River Storage Project. The purpose of the proposed action is to operate Flaming Gorge Dam to protect and assist in recovery of the populations and designated critical habitat of the four endangered fishes, while maintaining all authorized purposes of the Flaming Gorge Unit of the Colorado River Storage Project (CRSP), including those related to the development of water resources in accordance with the Colorado River Compact. As the Federal agency responsible for the operation of Flaming Gorge Dam, Reclamation was the lead agency in preparing the EIS. Eight cooperating agencies also participated in preparing this EIS: the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), Bureau of Land Management, National Park Service, State of Utah Department of Natural Resources, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • VGP) Version 2/5/2009
    Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) VESSEL GENERAL PERMIT FOR DISCHARGES INCIDENTAL TO THE NORMAL OPERATION OF VESSELS (VGP) AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act (CWA), as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), any owner or operator of a vessel being operated in a capacity as a means of transportation who: • Is eligible for permit coverage under Part 1.2; • If required by Part 1.5.1, submits a complete and accurate Notice of Intent (NOI) is authorized to discharge in accordance with the requirements of this permit. General effluent limits for all eligible vessels are given in Part 2. Further vessel class or type specific requirements are given in Part 5 for select vessels and apply in addition to any general effluent limits in Part 2. Specific requirements that apply in individual States and Indian Country Lands are found in Part 6. Definitions of permit-specific terms used in this permit are provided in Appendix A. This permit becomes effective on December 19, 2008 for all jurisdictions except Alaska and Hawaii. This permit and the authorization to discharge expire at midnight, December 19, 2013 i Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 William K. Honker, Acting Director Robert W. Varney, Water Quality Protection Division, EPA Region Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1 6 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, Barbara A.
    [Show full text]
  • Big-River Monitoring on the Colorado Plateau
    I NVENTORY & M ONITORING N ETWORK Big-River Monitoring on the Colorado Plateau Dustin Perkins1, Mike Scott2, Greg Auble2, Mark Wondzell3, Chris Holmquist-Johnson2, Eric Wahlig2, Helen Thomas1, and Aneth Wight1; 1Northern Colorado Plateau Network, P.O. Box 848, Bldg. 11, Arches National Park, Moab, UT 84532 2U.S. Geological Survey, Biological Resources Discipline, FORT Science Center, 2150 Centre Ave., Building C, Fort Collins, CO 80526; 3National Park Service, Water Resources Division, 1201 Oakridge Dr., Ste. 150, Fort Collins, CO 80525 Introduction and Green rivers in Canyonlands National Park. The Yampa River is the longest relatively free-flowing river Water has always been in short supply in the western reach remaining in the Colorado River basin. The U.S., making it a consistent source of conflict. In Green River is highly regulated by Flaming Gorge Dam the Colorado River drainage, an increasing human but is partially restored below its confluence with the population fuels increased demands for water from Yampa River. There have been large-scale changes the river and its tributaries. As a result, streamflow to the Green River since Flaming Gorge Dam was in virtually all of these systems has been altered by completed in 1962. reservoirs and other water-development projects. In most cases, reduced flows have significantly altered Monitoring of these rivers and their riparian peak flows and increased base flows that structure vegetation focuses on processes that affect the river floodplain vegetation, stream-channel morphology, channel, active bars, and riparian floodplains. To get and water quality (e.g., temperature, suspended a complete picture of river conditions, the NCPN sediment, nutrients).
    [Show full text]
  • Picturesque Secluded
    HHigighh MMeadeadoowsws RRanchanch Picturesque Secluded • 100+/- acres in the Morrison Creek valley 25 miles south of Steamboat Springs, Colorado • Majestic alpine setting with year-round meandering Morrison Creek and stocked pond. • Routt National Forest, adjoining the Sarvis Creek Wilderness area, is easily accessible • Meticulously maintained and traditionally used as a high-end guest ranch • Offers a 2,630 square foot lovely main residence • 2 fully furnished western-themed 1,500 square foot cabins, joined by walkway to hot tub • Well-designed horse facilities: multi-purpose barn, wranglers’ quarters & pole corrals • Perfect for a ‘Gentleman’s Ranch,’ a mountain retreat, guest ranch or horse property • Ideal venue for weddings, events, retreats and equine clinics Donna Corrigan, Ranch Broker (970) 736-8454 • (970) 846-8454 www.Colorado-Ranches.com Property and Area Information Location that can often dip into the 30s. lent big game hunting, fishing, hiking, Located 25 miles south of Steamboat Winter lows occasionally dip to biking and skiing. There are natural Springs, Colorado on County Road 16 minus 35 degrees, though daytime hot springs to soak in near Steamboat in the enchanting Morrison Creek val- temperatures are often in the 20s to Springs. Stagecoach and Steamboat ley. Stagecoach State Park and 30s. The relative humidity is quite State Parks provide boating and more Reservoir is located 5 miles to the low throughout the year. The aver- fishing opportunities nearby. north. The ranch is easily accessible age annual precipitation in the valley Snowshoeing, cross-country skiing, to the national forest to the east and is about 30 inches and much of it snowmobiling, and horseback riding backs up to the secluded part of the comes in the form of winter snow.
    [Show full text]
  • Itinerary: the Yampa River: 5 Days/4 Nights
    Itinerary: PO Box 1324 Moab, UT 84532 (800) 332-2439 The Yampa River: (435) 259-8229 Fax (435) 259-2226 Email: [email protected] 5 Days/4 Nights www.GriffithExp.com T h r o u g h Dinosaur National Monument O v e r v i e w of The Yampa River Meeting Place Best Western Antlers 423 West Main Street Vernal, UT 84078 Meeting Time : 6 : 3 0 pm (MDT) The evening before your trip Orientation: 6 : 3 0 pm (MDT) the day BEFORE d e p a r t u r e H e r e you will learn what to expect and prepare for, receive your dry bags, sign Assumption of Risk forms, and get a chance to ask last minute q u e s t i o n s . Morning Place : Best Western Antlers 423 West Main Street Vernal, UT 84078 M o r n i n g T i m e : 7 : 0 0 a m (MDT) Return Time : Approximately 5 : 0 0 - 6 : 0 0 P M Rapid Rating: C l a s s I I I - I V (water level dependent) # of Rapids : 16 River Miles: 72 P u t i n : Deer Lodge Park Ranger Station T a k e - out : Split Mountain boat ramp Trip Length: 5 D a y s / 4 N i g h t s Raft Type(s): O a r b o a t s , Paddleboats and Inflatable Kayaks Age Limit: Minimum Age is 10 y e a r s o l d What makes this trip special? The Yampa River through the Dinosaur National Monument has it all! As the last free-flowing river in the entire Colorado River drainage, the Yampa is incredibly wild in May and June.
    [Show full text]
  • Fsh 2709.11 – Special Uses Handbook Chapter 30 – Fee Determination
    2709.11_30 FOREST SERVICE HANDBOOK MEDICINE BOW-ROUTT NATIONAL FORESTS THUNDER BASIN NATIONAL GRASSLAND (REGION 2) LARAMIE, WY FSH 2709.11 – SPECIAL USES HANDBOOK CHAPTER 30 – FEE DETERMINATION Supplement No.: 2709.11-2017-1 Effective Date: June 22, 2017 Duration: This amendment is effective until superseded or removed. Approved: DENNIS L. JAEGER – Forest Supervisor Date Approved: June 8, 2017 Posting Instructions: Supplements are numbered consecutively by Handbook number and calendar year. Post by document; remove the entire document and replace it with this supplement retain this transmittal as the first page (s) of this document. The last amendment to this title was 2709.11-2012-1 to FSH 2709.11 Chapter 30. New Document 2709.11-2017-1 6 Superseded Document(s) 2709.11-2012-1 6 by Issuance Number and Effective Date DIGEST: 31.1 – Revises list of Regional fees for National Forest System lands within the Medicine-Bow- Routt National Forests and Thunder Basin National Grassland R2 Supplement 2709.11-2017-1 2709.11_30 EFFECTIVE DATE: 06/22/2017 Page 2 of 6 DURATION: This amendment is effective until superseded or removed. FSH 2709.11 - SPECIAL USES HANDBOOK CHAPTER 30 – FEE DETERMINATION 30 – ESTABLISHING FEES. 31.1 – Methods for Determining Fair Market Value. 3. Fee System and Schedule. The following schedule shall be used to compute the fee for land use authorizations where the fee is based on land-only value. This includes all new uses, re-newels for existing uses, and the ability to adjust fees. This schedule shall not be used for authorizations which already are covered by another fee system or schedule, such as linear rights-of-way, recreation residences, communication sites, ski areas, municipal reservoirs, outfitter-guide permits.
    [Show full text]
  • Flaming Gorge Operation Plan - May 2021 Through April 2022
    Flaming Gorge Operation Plan - May 2021 through April 2022 Concurrence by Kathleen Callister, Resources Management Division Manager Kent Kofford, Provo Area Office Manager Nicholas Williams, Upper Colorado Basin Power Manager Approved by Wayne Pullan, Upper Colorado Basin Regional Director U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation • Interior Region 7 Upper Colorado Basin • Power Office Salt Lake City, Utah May 2021 Purpose This Flaming Gorge Operation Plan (FG-Ops) fulfills the 2006 Flaming Gorge Record of Decision (ROD) requirement for May 2021 through April 2022. The FG-Ops also completes the 4-step process outlined in the Flaming Gorge Standard Operation Procedures. The Upper Colorado Basin Power Office (UCPO) operators will fulfil the operation plan and may alter from FG-Ops due to day to day conditions, although we will attempt to stay within the boundaries of the operations defined below. Listed below are proposed operation plans for four different scenarios: moderately dry, average (above median), average (below median), and moderately wet. As of the publishing of this document, the most likely scenario is the moderately dry, however actual operations will vary with hydrologic conditions. The Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program (Recovery Program), the Flaming Gorge Technical Working Group (FGTWG), Flaming Gorge Working Group (FG WG), United States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and Western Area Power Administration (WAPA) provided input that was considered in the development of this report. The FG-Ops describes the current hydrologic classification of the Green River Basin and the hydrologic conditions in the Yampa River Basin. The FG-Ops identifies the most likely Reach 2 peak flow magnitude and duration that is to be targeted for the upcoming spring flows.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C - Roadless Areas
    Appendix C - Roadless Areas Purpose The purpose of this appendix is to describe roadless areas and the analysis factors used in evaluating individual roadless areas on the Routt National Forest. It includes a description of the physical and biological features, primitive recreation and education opportunities, resources, and present management situation for each area. Background Roadless Area Review and Evaluation In 1970, the Forest Service studied all administratively designated primitive areas and inventoried and reviewed all roadless areas in the National Forest System greater than 5,000 acres. This study was known as the Roadless Area Review and Evaluation (RARE). RARE was halted in 1972 due to legal challenge. RARE identified 711,043 acres of roadless area on the Routt National Forest. In 1977, the Forest Service began another nation-wide Roadless Area Review and Evaluation (RARE II) to identify roadless and undeveloped areas within the National Forest System that were suitable for inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System. Twenty nine areas, totalling 566,756 acres, were inventoried on the Routt National Forest (including the Middle Park Ranger District of the Arapaho-Roosevelt National Forest). As a result of RARE II, four areas on the forest - Williams Fork, St. Louis Peak, Service Creek, and Davis Peak - were administratively designated as Further Planning Areas (FPA). This further planning area designation meant that more information was needed before the Forest Service would recommend any of these areas to Congress for wilderness designation. In January 1979, the Forest Service issued nationally a Final Environmental Impact Statement documenting a review of 62 million acres of roadless and undeveloped areas within the 191-million-acre National Forest System.
    [Show full text]
  • 1994 Pilot Corrected
    1994 Steamboat Pilot Index Indexed by Peggy Dorr and Rosemary Dukelow at CMountain College Alpine Campus Library (970) 870-4451 Summary Comments Date Page AARP establishes scholarship for women age 50+ to enter or return to work 12/08/94 B1 AAUW hosts a public Dare To Be You program through Extension Office 10/06/94 A10 Abbott, Hardy B. (military poet and author) obituary 03/24/94 D4 Abernathy, Charles M. (physician) obituary 03/31/94 B6 Abernathy, Meghan B. graduates from Fort Lewis College 02/24/94 B4 Academic Year in America seeks families to host students 08/18/94 A6 Access Awareness Group meets 03/17/94 C1 Access Awareness Group presents First National Bank with certificate 06/02/94 B1 Ackerman, James "Bear" announces plans to run for county surveyor 01/13/94 A4 Addresses need to be made visible and correct 02/10/94 A9 Adventure Bound Camps offer teenagers three weeks of outdoor activities 05/19/94 B7 Advocates Against Battering & Abuse host candle lighting 09/29/94 C6 Advocates Against Battering & Abuse kickoff fund-raising drive 03/24/94 D3 Advocates Against Battering & Abuse select Nov. 13 for Decadent Desserts photos 11/10/94 C1 Affordable Housing Construction Assistance Program offers down-payment loans 12/08/94 B1 Affordable Housing Foundation accepts requests from non-profits 08/11/94 B1 Affordable housing need rises by 15 percent 12/15/94 A1 Affordable housing problems cited in Vail editorial 03/24/94 A7 Affordable housing seekers must consider outlying areas editorial 04/07/94 A7 Affordable lots offered by Pagoda Peak Land
    [Show full text]
  • Yampa River Is Placed on Call for 1St Time Ever | Steamboattoday.Com 8/12/20, 943 AM
    Yampa River is placed on call for 1st time ever | SteamboatToday.com 8/12/20, 943 AM YOUR AD HERE » Yampa River is placed on call for 1st time ever News FOLLOW NEWS | September 5, 2018 Eleanor C. Hasenbeck FOLLOW [email protected] The Yampa River flows through Dinosaur National Monument around Aug. 18. Low flows in the lower stretch of the river led water managers to curtail some use of water from the river. (courtesy photo) STEAMBOAT SPRINGS — For the first time, water users on the main stem of the Yampa River have been curtailed. Due to low water conditions in the lower stretch of the river near Dinosaur National Monument, the Colorado Division of Water Resources placed a call on the river Tuesday. The call applies to water users upstream from the river’s lowest diversion point, which essentially places the entire river on call. https://www.steamboatpilot.com/news/yampa-river-is-placed-on-call-for-1st-time-ever/ Page 1 of 4 Yampa River is placed on call for 1st time ever | SteamboatToday.com 8/12/20, 943 AM “We are now faced again with the Yampa River being extremely low at its lower end, and we are unable to both protect the Endangered Fishes Recovery Program reservoir water and allow all water users to continue to divert water,” Erin Light, the area division engineer, wrote in an email to water users in the Yampa River Basin on Wednesday morning. The Division of Water Resources places a call on a stream when water rights owners do not receive the amount of water they have a legal right to.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Small Vessel General Permit
    ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PUBLIC NOTICE The United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 W. Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois has requested a determination from the Illinois Department of Natural Resources if their Vessel General Permit (VGP) and Small Vessel General Permit (sVGP) are consistent with the enforceable policies of the Illinois Coastal Management Program (ICMP). VGP regulates discharges incidental to the normal operation of commercial vessels and non-recreational vessels greater than or equal to 79 ft. in length. sVGP regulates discharges incidental to the normal operation of commercial vessels and non- recreational vessels less than 79 ft. in length. VGP and sVGP can be viewed in their entirety at the ICMP web site http://www.dnr.illinois.gov/cmp/Pages/CMPFederalConsistencyRegister.aspx Inquiries concerning this request may be directed to Jim Casey of the Department’s Chicago Office at (312) 793-5947 or [email protected]. You are invited to send written comments regarding this consistency request to the Michael A. Bilandic Building, 160 N. LaSalle Street, Suite S-703, Chicago, Illinois 60601. All comments claiming the proposed actions would not meet federal consistency must cite the state law or laws and how they would be violated. All comments must be received by July 19, 2012. Proposed Small Vessel General Permit (sVGP) United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) SMALL VESSEL GENERAL PERMIT FOR DISCHARGES INCIDENTAL TO THE NORMAL OPERATION OF VESSELS LESS THAN 79 FEET (sVGP) AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act, as amended (33 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]