021-1985 WLU Festival

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

FROM Wilfrid Laurier University 021-1985 SPECIAL TO: The Waterloo Chronicle Richard K. Taylor The Independent, Elmira March 8, 1985 There was a King Arthur WLU festival audience told There was a King Arthur! Thats the word from an authority, Geoffrey Ashe, a British scholar and historian, who chose the Arthurian festival at Wilfrid Laurier University last week to give a lecture that summed up his years of research. Arthur really did exist and was indeed a great king, he said, only he was known partly by his title, Riothamus, a fact that may have misled some historians. The word means "great king" or "high king." It was used in much the same fashion as another great ruler, Temujin, is now remembered as Ghengis Khan, a term meaning "very mighty ruler." Ashe has written 19 books, nine about Arthur, and the latest is probably the most important. It is titled, The Discovery of King Arthur, and lays out Ashes Arthur-Riothamus theory. According to legend, Ashe explains, the great monarch crossed the channel to the continent, leading glorious expeditions and finally disappearing from history without dying. -more- -2- Riothamus is mentioned in some fifth-century letters and continental histories as having fought in Gaul in the years 468 to 470 A.D. Ashe says these dates coincide with the description of King Arthur by Geoffrey of Monmouth, the 15th century historian who first popularized the tales of Arthur. Ashes book is the book-of-the-month selection for two book clubs, one in the United States and one in Britain, and he has been asked to contribute an article on his theory to an encyclopedia. The British historian is also giving a number of other lectures on campus and is here on the invitation of Hugh MacLachlan, chairman of the English department, and chairman for the week-long festival. Among the events for the week were a number of Arthurian films, a medieval fair, two medieval feasts, one on campus and the other at the Seagram Museum, and four presentations of a shortened version of Lerner and Loewes musical, Camelot. -30-.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Introduction: the Legend of King Arthur
Department of History University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire “HIC FACET ARTHURUS, REX QUONDAM, REXQUE FUTURUS” THE ANALYSIS OF ORIGINAL MEDIEVAL SOURCES IN THE SEARCH FOR THE HISTORICAL KING ARTHUR Final Paper History 489: Research Seminar Professor Thomas Miller Cooperating Professor: Professor Matthew Waters By Erin Pevan November 21, 2006 1 Copyright for this work is owned by the author. This digital version is published by McIntyre Library, University of Wisconsin – Eau Claire with the consent of the author. 2 Department of History University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire Abstract of: “HIC FACET ARTHURUS, REX QUONDAM, REXQUE FUTURUS” THE ANALYSIS OF ORIGINAL MEDIEVAL SOURCES IN THE SEARCH FOR THE HISTORICAL KING ARTHUR Final Paper History 489: Research Seminar Professor Thomas Miller Cooperating Professor: Matthew Waters By Erin Pevan November 21, 2006 The stories of Arthurian literary tradition have provided our modern age with gripping tales of chivalry, adventure, and betrayal. King Arthur remains a hero of legend in the annals of the British Isles. However, one question remains: did King Arthur actually exist? Early medieval historical sources provide clues that have identified various figures that may have been the template for King Arthur. Such candidates such as the second century Roman general Lucius Artorius Castus, the fifth century Breton leader Riothamus, and the sixth century British leader Ambrosius Aurelianus hold high esteem as possible candidates for the historical King Arthur. Through the analysis of original sources and authors such as the Easter Annals, Nennius, Bede, Gildas, and the Annales Cambriae, parallels can be established which connect these historical figures to aspects of the Arthur of literary tradition.
[Show full text]
Arthur Pack2
Arthur – King Of The Britons Easter Sunday 31 March 2002 Contents Arthur – King Of The Britons Introduction . 2 Key elements of the legend . 3 The truth behind the myth: King Arthur . 4 The identity of the real Arthur . 4 Tintagel – Arthur’s birthplace? . 4 The sword in the stone . 5 The magic of Excalibur . 5 Camelot . 5 The Round Table . 6 Arthur’s final resting place . 6 Presenter Richard Harris . 7 Production credits . 8 Arthur – King Of The Britons Introduction Arthur – King Of The Britons Easter Sunday 31 March 2002 on BBC ONE King Arthur is one of the most famous figures Arthur – King Of The Britons is a BBC in British mythology – but did he really exist? Manchester production. The producer and Arthur – King Of The Britons goes on a quest director is Jean Claude Bragard and the to discover the true story behind the legend. executive producer is Ruth Pitt. Richard Harris – who famously portrayed Arthur in the film Camelot – unravels Arthur’s story and finds evidence for a real flesh-and- blood hero, hidden away in one of the most obscure periods of British history. The programme reveals that there is compelling evidence for a real warrior king, a leader who united the Dark Age tribes of Britain against a common enemy, and overcame amazing odds to stem the tide of invasion for decades. The earliest reliable record of the legend of King Arthur is a book written by Geoffrey of Monmouth in the 12th century, but the myth of Arthur continues to enthrall people around the world.
[Show full text]
Reconsidering the Origins of the Arthurian Legend Rae Marie Marotta '00 Illinois Wesleyan University
Illinois Wesleyan University Digital Commons @ IWU Honors Projects English 2000 The oP wer of Perception and Origin Myth: Reconsidering the Origins of the Arthurian Legend Rae Marie Marotta '00 Illinois Wesleyan University Recommended Citation Marotta '00, Rae Marie, "The Power of Perception and Origin Myth: Reconsidering the Origins of the Arthurian Legend" (2000). Honors Projects. Paper 7. http://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/eng_honproj/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by The Ames Library, the Andrew W. Mellon Center for Curricular and Faculty Development, the Office of the Provost and the Office of the President. It has been accepted for inclusion in Digital Commons @ IWU by the faculty at Illinois Wesleyan University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ©Copyright is owned by the author of this document. rmarotta: 7 1 Contemporary Theories and Arthur's Historical Prototypes "On the basic issue ofArthur's identity, there need never have been any mystery at all." -Geoffrey Ashe Riothamusl Geoffrey Ashe has made the most recent attempt to find a historical prototype of Arthur. According to Ashe, Arthur's history is more than just a medley of yams, more than just a saga in the" dream time" myth. It puts him within a definite period. It names definite places, and takes him to definite countries .... This is not to say that the official history is true. As it stands, it isn't. But its fullness and firmness, and its power of shaping a consensus, justify a search for the realities behind it. (Discovery 3) For Ashe, there is no need to consider the possibility that Arthur's roots are legendary.
[Show full text]
Introduction 1
NOTES Introduction 1 . Siân Echard, Arthurian Narrative in the Latin Tradition , Cambridge Studies in Medieval Literature 36 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998 ), p. 14; Helen Cooper, The English Romance in Time: Transforming Motifs from Geoffrey of Monmouth to the Death of Shakespeare (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004 ), pp. 26–27; Anne F. Sutton and Livia Visser-Fuchs, “The Dark Dragon of the Normans: A Creation of Geoffrey of Monmouth, Stephen of Rouen, and Merlin Silvester,” Quondam et Futurus: A Journal of Arthurian Interpretations 2.2 ( 1992 ): 2 [1–19]. 2 . Julia Briggs discusses the Vortiger and Uther Pendragon plays per- formed by Philip Henslowe’s company as well as William Rowley’s The Birth of Merlin and Thomas Middleton’s Hengist , “New Times and Old Stories: Middleton’s Hengist ,” Literary Appropriations of the Anglo-Saxons from the Thirteenth to the Twentieth Century , ed. Donald Scragg and Carole Weinberg, Cambridge Studies in Anglo-Saxon England 29 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000 ), pp. 108–9 [107–21]. 3 . For evidence supporting a late 1138 date for Geoffrey’s HRB , see Wright, introduction to HRB Bern , p. xvi [ix-lix] and John Gillingham, “The Context and Purposes of Geoffrey of Monmouth’s History of the Kings of Britain ,” Anglo-Norman Studies 13 (1991 ): 100 n5 [99–118]. 4 . Clarke, introduction to VM , p. vii [vii-50]; Echard, Arthurian Narrative , p. 218. 5 . Lee Patterson, Negotiating the Past: The Historical Understanding of Medieval Literature (Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1987 ), pp. 160, 201, 170, and 187; Virgil, Aeneid in Eclogues, Georgics, Aeneid I-VI , trans.
[Show full text]
The Battle of Averne 469 AD
The Battle of Averne 469 AD “Now Eurich, king of the Visigoths, perceived the frequent change of Roman Emperors and strove to hold Gaul by his own right. The Emperor Anthemius heard of it and asked the Brittones for aid. Their King Riotimus came with twelve thousand men into the state of the Bituriges by the way of Ocean, and was received as he disembarked from his ships. Eurich, king of the Visigoths, came against them with an innumerable army, and after a long fight he routed Riotimus, king of the Brittones, before the Romans could join him. So when he had lost a great part of his army, he fled with all the men he could gather together, and came to the Burgundians, a neighboring tribe then allied to the Romans. But Eurich, king of the Visigoths, seized the Gallic city of Arverna; for the Emperor Anthemius was now dead. Engaged in fierce war with his son-in-law Ricimer, he had worn out Rome and was himself finally slain by his son-in-law and yielded the rule to Olybrius ” Jordanes; Origins and Deeds of the Goths. Gaul in the period after the Battle. The Scenario Riothamus is often conflated with the title, High King. Sometimes he is equated with the legendary King Arthur, High King of the Britons. In terms of British History this period of 460-70 AD may represent the time when Ambrosius Aurelianus and the Romano-British have successfully contained the Saxon Revolt and regained control of most of Britain. Soon after the defeat of Riothamus and the large British contingent (who are never heard of again) the Saxons once again become active.
[Show full text]
Dark Age Isles Summary
Dark Age Isles Summary By Matt Schwoebel Dark Age Isles: Rome, Arthur, and the New West (337-686 A.D.) is a heuristic, generational, geographic history of the Dark Age period in the Isles – Britain (England, Scotland, & Wales), Ireland, and Brittany (Armorica) including adjacent areas of Gaul/Francia. Contents: I. Introduction to Dark Age Isles Myth and Reality Page 2 II. Seven Cultural-Historical Phases Page 4 III. Generation Timeline Page 7 1 © Matt Schwoebel I. Introduction to Dark Age Isles Myth and Reality The period and place covered by this book represent one of the least enlightened by surviving written records from the Dark Ages. Between 337 A.D. and 686 A.D, the reasonably integrated Roman province of Britannia became an early form of England (or Angleland) divided into multiple kingdoms. The imperial language of Latin (in its vulgar form) was no longer spoken. Unusually in former western imperial lands a native language, Brythonic Celtic (Welsh), AND a conqueror language, Anglo-Saxon (English), arose to replace Latin. This linguistic situation is unique with Basque (Euskara) being the only other pre-Roman native survivor. Elsewhere a Latin dialect prevailed or a Germanic or Slavic conqueror language replaced it. There are eight myths listed below that will be addressed by this book. It will describe seven main cultural-historical phases between the death of Emperor Constantine the Great in 337 A.D. and the death of the last Pagan Saes king in 686 A.D. (along with the great Pict victory the year before). The main portion of the book will describe the changing situation in Britannia (England & Wales), Hibernia (Ireland), Caledonia (Pictland/Scotland), and an extended Armorica (Brittany) generation by generation.
[Show full text]
Geoffrey of Monmouth Hypothes.Is Reading
L..0J 6AA J 152 Riddles rrz.l (. A,J'i1./,Ld~ :?f €,.)Us t( l.,. k and dash of waves; few men I saw my home in that wilderness, V.7l. I (1...~ n. P,.-) /~~). but each dawn, each dusk, 1 the tawny waves surged and swirled /.}\JV) /)M«.D5c{ {{) . around me. Little did I think that I, mouth less, should ever sing to men sitting at the mead-bench, 10 vary ing my pitch. It is rather puzzling, a miracle to men ignorant of such arts, how a knife's point and a right hand (mind and implement moving as one) could cut and carve me-so that I 15 can send you a message without fear, and no one else can overhear or noise abroad the words we share. Solutions: 1. Penis or onion; 2. Bible; 3. Book worm; 4. Pen and fingers; 5. Reed. After the Norman Conquest P ERSPECTI VES Arthurian Myth in the History o f Britain A lmost since it first appeared, the story of King Arthur has occupied a contested zone between myth and history. Far from diminishing the Arthurian tradition, though, this ambiguity has lent it a tremendous and protean impact on the political and cultural imagination of Europe, from the Middle Ages to the present. Probably no ocher body of medieval legend remains today as widely known and as often revisited as the Arthurian story. O ne measure of Arthur's undiminished importance is the eager debate, eight centuries old and going strong, about his historical status. Whether or not a specific "Arthur" ever exist ed, legends and attributes gathered around his name from a very early dace, mostly in texts of W elsh background.
[Show full text]
Arthur and the Giant of Mont-Saint-Michel: the Creation
Arthur and the Giant of Mont-Saint-Michel: the Creation of a Folktale Four writers mention the activities of the Britons in Gaul in the fifth century: the Gothic historian, Jordanes; Sidonius Apollinaris, Prefect of Rome and later Bishop of Clermont-Ferrand; Gregory, bishop of Tours; and Geoffrey of Monmouth. Jordanes, writing his De Origine Actibusque Getarum ('On the Origin and Deeds of the Goths') in 551, tells of the deeds of Euric,, king of the Visigoths (between466 and 485).1 The Visigoths already hold most of Spain but, spurred on by changes of government in Rome,, Euric thinks to conquer parts of Gaul as well. The Western Roman emperor, Anthemius, thus seeks assistance from the Britons, and their king, Riotimus, mounts an expedition: Anthemius imperator Brittonum solacia postulavit. quorum rex Riotimus cum duodecim milia veniens in Beturigas civitate Oceano e navibus egresso susceptus est'Emperor Anthemius sought help from the Britons, of whom the king Riotimus, coming with 12,000 (men) into the state of the Bituriges by way of the Ocean, was received as he came out of his ships' (pp. I 1 8-1 191.2 Euric comes to Riotimus, in Berry, with a great force. and defeats him: ad [eosJ rex Vesegotharum Eurichus innumerum ductans advenit exercitum diuque pugnans Riutimum Brittonum rege, antequam Romani in euis societate coniungerentur, effugavit'Eurich, king of the Visigoths, came against (them) leading an immense affny, and fighting fbr a long time against Ri(o)timus, king of the Britons, put him to flight, before the Romans could join up with him' (p.
[Show full text]
The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire
THE HISTORY OF THE DECLINE AND FALL OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE BY EDWARDGIBBON ,, EDITED BY i J. B. BURY, M.A. WITH AN INTRODUCTION nY THE RT. HON. W. E. H. LECKY VOL. VI NEW YORK FRED DE FAU & COMPANY PUBLISHERS COPYRIGHT, Iga7. FRED DE FAU & COMPANY. CONTENTS OF THE SIXTH VOLUME PAGE LISTOF ILLUSTBATIONS . xi CHAPTER XXXIV The Character, Conquests, and Court of Attila, King of the Huns - Denth of Theodosius the Younger -Elevation of Marcien to the Empire of the &st A.D. , 376-433 TheHuns . .......I Their Establishment in modernHungary . 2 433-453 Reign of Attila . -3 H is FigureCharacterHisand . 4 He discovers the Sword of Mars . 6 Acquires theEmpire of Scythia and Germany . .7 430-440 TheHuns invadePersia . .9 41,&c. They attackEasternthe Empire . XI Ravage Europe as far as Constantinople . la The Scythian or TartarWars . , 14 State of the Captives . .x6 446 Treaty of Peace betweenAttila Ad theEastern Empire . 19 Spirit of the Azimuntines . 21 EmbassiesfromAttila to Constantinople . 22 448 The Embassy of Maximin to Attila . ’ 25 The royal Village and Palace . .28 The Behaviour of Attilato the Roman Ambassadors . 30 The royal Feast . .32 Conspiracy of theRomans against the Life of Attila . 34 He re rimands and forgives theEmperor . 35 450 ThdosiusYounger the dies . ’ 36 Is succeededby Marcian . ’ 37 CHAPTER XXXV Invasion of Gad by Attila - He is repulsed by Aetius and the Visigoths - Attila invades and evacrralcs Itdy - The Dealhs of Attila, Aetius, and Vakntinian the Third 450 Attila threatensboth Empires, and prepares to invade Gaul . 39 433-454 Character and Administration of Aetius .
[Show full text]
Recovering the Historical Arthur Marcus Ladd Bucknell University
Comparative Humanities Review Volume 1 Article 3 Issue 1 Conversation/Conversion 1.1 2007 Recovering the Historical Arthur Marcus Ladd Bucknell University Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.bucknell.edu/chr Recommended Citation Ladd, Marcus (2007) "Recovering the Historical Arthur ," Comparative Humanities Review: Vol. 1: Iss. 1, Article 3. Available at: http://digitalcommons.bucknell.edu/chr/vol1/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Bucknell Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Comparative Humanities Review by an authorized administrator of Bucknell Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Recovering the Historical Arthur Marcus Ladd Bucknell University And at the feste of Pentecost alle maner of men assayed to pulle at the swerde that wold assay; but none myghte prevaille but Arthur, and pullit it oute afore all the lordes and comyns that were there - wherefore alle the comyns cryed at ones, 'We wille have Arthur unto our kyng. We wille put hym no more in delay, for we all see that it is Goddes wille that he shalle be our kynge - and who that holdeth ageynst it, we wille slee hym.' And therwithall they knelyd at ones, both ryche and poure, and cryed Arthur mercy bycause they had delayed hym so longe. And Arthur foryaf hem, and took the swerd bitwene both his handes and offred it upon the aulter where the Archebisshop was; and so was he made knyghte of the best man that was there. –Sir Thomas Malory, Le Morte d’Arthur1 Much ink (and blood) has been spilled over the truth of the Arthurian saga, and though debates over the centuries have moved away from Breton streets2 and into journals, a conclusive stance has yet to be reached.
[Show full text]
The Origins of the Arthurian Legend
origins of the arthurian legends 1 The Origins of the Arthurian Legend geoffrey ashe After prolonged debate, the search for the ‘historical Arthur’ remains inconclusive, because of the nature of the evidence which historians take into account. Possibilities arise, however, from evidence of another kind. Literary inquiry can lead towards historical insight and identify an Arthur- figure who has been noticed at various times, but not adequately considered. (GA) o the question ‘Did Arthur exist?’ a straight yes-or-no answer cannot be T given. More is involved here than historical doubt. With, say, Robin Hood, the straight answer is likewise excluded, but solely by insufficiency of data. A new find might some day make it possible. With Arthur the difficulty cuts deeper. For any ordinary inquirer, the answer ‘yes’ implies the reality of the Arthur of romance, the idealized medieval monarch, at the centre of a sort of montage that includes Guinevere and Merlin and the Knights of the Round Table. Since Arthur in that sense is a literary creation and didn’t exist, the answer ‘yes’ is wrong. But the answer ‘no’ is also wrong. It implies that Arthur is fictitious as Don Quixote is fictitious, that he has no factual basis at all. The romancers themselves would never have accepted that, and it cannot be maintained as a definite statement. Actually, of course, the literary Arthur is a shape-shifter who has taken different forms over the centuries. But all versions presumably derive from a source or prototype earlier than any. There have been numerous attempts to work back to this point, and, more specifically, to pin down a ‘historical Arthur’ as the starting-point, so that the question of existence can be affirmatively answered … on the understanding that this is the Arthur who is meant.
[Show full text]
OBINUS, Fictitious Archbishop of London. He Appears Fourth in a List Attributed to Jocelin of Furness, Succeeding Cadar and Succ
A WELSH CLASSICAL DICTIONARY OBINUS, fictitious archbishop of London. He appears fourth in a list attributed to Jocelin of Furness, succeeding Cadar and succeeded by Conan (John Stow, The Chronicles of England, 1580, p.56). OCTAVIUS, Duke of the Gewissei. See Eudaf Hen. ODGAR ab AEDD. (Legendary). Odgar ab Aedd, king of Ireland, appears in the tale of ‘Culhwch and Olwen’. He accompanied Arthur to the west of Ireland in the search for Gwrgi Seferi, the purpose of which is never explained (RM 134). Later Arthur dispatched a message to Odgar to seek the cauldron of Diwrnach Wyddel, his overseer. Odgar, king of Ireland, besought Diwrnach to give it, but he would not (RM 135). Odgar was the only person who could pluck from the head of Ysgithyrwyn, Chief Boar, the tusk which Ysbaddaden Pencawr required in order to shave himself for the wedding of Culhwch and Olwen (WM 452, RM 122). However it was actually ‘Cadw’ [Caw] of Prydyn who ‘took’ the tusk (RM 135). Odgar was brother of Gwitard, son of Aedd king of Ireland. On the name see Patrick Sims-Williams in BBCS 29 pp.605-6 (1982). ODIAR the Frank. (Legendary). He is mentioned as Odyar franc in the romance of ‘Geraint and Enid’ as the steward of Arthur's Court (WM 412, RM 265). See further CO(2) p.227. ODWYN ap TEITHWALCH. (1040) He is mentioned in the genealogies as a descendant of Ceredig ap Cunedda, and the father of Morfydd the mother of Gwaithfoed of Ceredigion (PP §45). Here the spelling is Odwin.
[Show full text]