(Pecten Maximus (L.)) Dredge Discards Using a Static Time-Lapse Camera System

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

(Pecten Maximus (L.)) Dredge Discards Using a Static Time-Lapse Camera System Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 255 (2000) 111±129 www.elsevier.nl/locate/jembe An in situ study of predator aggregations on scallop (Pecten maximus (L.)) dredge discards using a static time-lapse camera system L.O. Vealea,* , A.S. Hill b , A.R. Brand a aUniversity of Liverpool Port Erin Marine Laboratory, Port Erin, Isle of Man IM96JA, UK bSEPA, Clearwater House, Heriot-Watt Research Park, Edinburgh EH14 4AP, UK Received 25 May 2000; received in revised form 19 September 2000; accepted 21 September 2000 Abstract The impact of demersal ®shing gears on benthic habitats and species has been the subject of much attention recently, and suggestions have been made that scavenging epifaunal species may bene®t at the population level from the additional food source provided by discards. This paper investigates some aspects of this process, including the relative attractiveness to predators of different discard species, and the role of damage in scavenger attraction. A time-lapse video system with a 1000 m long cable was positioned in an area closed to ®shing, adjacent to the most heavily ®shed scallop (Pecten maximus) ground in the Irish Sea. A variety of undamaged and damaged by-catch animals were positioned in front of the camera, and the subsequent predator aggregations investigated. Densities of scavenger species up to 200 times that of the background population were observed, and aggregations of some species persisted for up to 3 days. The most frequently recorded scavengers, and therefore presumably those species most likely to bene®t from discards as a food source, were: Asterias rubens L., Astropecten irregularis (Pennant), Liocar- cinus spp Stimpson, Pagurus spp Fabricius and Callionymus lyra L. Predator attraction to apparently undamaged queen scallops, Aequipecten opercularis (L.), was almost as high as to damaged A. opercularis. Of all the prey species studied, queen scallops were the most attractive to scavengers. A directional relationship was found between the ambient water current and the arrival of the star®sh, Asterias rubens. 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Fisheries by-catch and discards; Fishing impact; Pecten maximus; Predator aggregation; Time-lapse video *Corresponding author. Tel.: 144-1624-831-017; fax: 144-1624-831-001. E-mail address: [email protected] (L.O. Veale). 0022-0981/00/$ ± see front matter 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. PII: S0022-0981(00)00295-1 112 L.O. Veale et al. / J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 255 (2000) 111 ±129 1. Introduction Mobile demersal ®shing gears are known to have a detrimental effect on benthic epifaunal and infaunal communities (Dayton et al., 1995; Thrush et al., 1995; Jennings and Kaiser, 1998), often dramatically increasing local mortality in the wake of the gear (Kaiser and Spencer, 1994b); this may have long-term implications for the structure of the community (Thrush et al., 1998). Both those animals disturbed or damaged by the passage of the gear and left on the seabed, and those retained in the catch and subsequently discarded, are known to attract mobile predators (Kaiser and Spencer, 1994a, 1996), which act as facultative scavengers (Britton and Morton, 1994). This ability to feed opportunistically on dead and dying animals, coupled with robustness to capture and damage in the ®shing gear, may confer an increased survivorship on certain species that, in turn, may lead to an enhanced population size (Polis et al., 1996; Ramsay et al., 1997b), e.g. the ¯at®sh, Limanda limanda (L.) (Kaiser and Ramsay, 1997). In intensively ®shed areas, such as the North Sea, this carrion will inevitably subsidize some marine food webs (Furness, 1996; Ramsay et al., 1997b). The levels of ®shing effort presently exerted by scallop (Pecten maximus) and queen scallop (Aequipecten opercularis) dredging in the northern Irish Sea (approx. 177,000 metre hours for the 1994±95 ®shing season) will potentially introduce a large amount of by-catch material [approximately 231 tonnes for the 1994±95 season (L. Veale, unpublished data)] into the food web; a proportion of this will become available to benthic predators and scavengers. Aggregations of scavenging species after the passage of towed demersal ®shing gears have been recorded in several previous studies, mainly by submersible, video or diver observations made along a ®shed track (e.g., Medcof and Bourne, 1964; Caddy, 1973; Chapman et al., 1977; Murawski and Serchuk, 1989; Kaiser and Spencer, 1994b). These have all noted increased densities of several ®sh and invertebrate scavenging species in response to ®shing activities, but details such as the relative attractiveness of the different prey species, the importance of prey damage, and the relationship between direction of attraction and water movement, have not been addressed. It is of particular importance to ascertain whether apparently undamaged animals are equally likely to be preyed upon after discard, as this will have implications for the potential bene®ts of gear modi®cations designed to reduce animal damage. Some studies have used baited time-lapse stills cameras deployed from research vessels to investigate the scavengers attracted to damaged animals typical of material discarded from ®shing gears (e.g., Kaiser and Spencer, 1996; Ramsay et al., 1997b). Here, the maximum scavenger activity occurred within 24 h. This approach allows a detailed investigation of the arrival times of different scavenging species and the rate of bait consumption. However, a stills camera will inevitably return fewer frames than a video camera, and its deployment from a ship will either limit the duration of the investigation, or incur high ship-time costs. Invertebrate scavenger species are generally slow moving, and slow at ingesting and digesting food, so it is important that such investigations are of suf®cient duration to adequately record the arrival of all species attracted to the prey, and to monitor their subsequent departure. A static time-lapse video system was deployed in this study to identify the major L.O. Veale et al. / J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 255 (2000) 111 ±129 113 species involved in scavenging dead and damaged benthos typical of that either discarded from scallop dredges, or damaged and left on the seabed. A 1000 m long cable allowed the camera to be positioned offshore, on an area of seabed typical of that supporting the local scallop ®shery, but within an area closed to commercial ®shing (Bradshaw et al., 2000). Recordings totalling over 2000 h were made, which would have been impossible to achieve using SCUBA divers or cameras deployed from a ship. These extended time periods ensured that the aggregation and dispersion of slow-moving invertebrate scavengers were adequately monitored. Firstly, the relative merits of using white and red light to record nighttime footage were compared. Next, the aggregation of scavengers on mixed damaged benthos was examined, and then the attractiveness of different by-catch species was investigated using four mono-speci®c baits: damaged Aequipecten opercularis, Pecten maximus, Asterias rubens and Buccinum undatum L. These species were chosen as they represented some of the most abundant members of the catch assemblage of the north Irish Sea scallop ®shery (Veale et al., 2000). The composition and size of scavenger aggregations attracted to both damaged and undamaged A. opercularis were then compared. An exploration of the interaction of water current direction and distribution of olfactory stimuli was conducted for Asterias rubens. 2. Materials and methods From the 14th June to 5th October 1996, a static video camera system was deployed in the area closed to ®shing off Port Erin, Isle of Man. This was during the closed season for the great scallop, which runs from 1st June to 31st October inclusive: no commercial dredging occurred in the vicinity during the study. A Rovtech Systems low-light colour camera with two 250 W lights was used. The signal was transmitted to a terrestrial control box via a booster unit and 1000 m of cable. The image was recorded on a Panasonic SVHS time-lapse video recorder, and real time video was viewed on a JVC colour monitor. The camera was situated approximately 600 m offshore in 25 m depth, due west of the Marine Laboratory (Fig. 1), mounted on a galvanised Dexian frame at an angle of 458, 1 m above the seabed. The camera was orientated facing east, perpen- dicular to the prevailing currents in the area, which travel north or south, depending on tidal state. Throughout the study period divers positioned a variety of baits loose on the seabed in front of the camera. Mixed bait comprised a variety of dredge-caught epifaunal species, including Aequipecten opercularis, Pecten maximus, Neptunea antiqua (L.), Buccinum undatum, Echinus esculentus Lamarck, and Asterias rubens, which were damaged just prior to baiting: damage was applied with stones and metal bars to simulate that observed in damaged by-catch animals. Baited periods were interspersed with unbaited (control) periods, and the camera was repositioned three times to reduce the number of animals permanently associating themselves with the frame, although no differences in background (unbaited) abundance were noted after repositioning. Initially, the relative merits of using white and red light to record nighttime footage were compared in single 3-day unbaited trials with each type of light. Then the 114 L.O. Veale et al. / J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 255 (2000) 111 ±129 relocated over three positions throughout the study. Fig. 1. Approximate positions of the ®xed camera within the area closed to ®shing. Diamonds indicate the positions of navigation buoys. The camera was L.O. Veale et al. / J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 255 (2000) 111 ±129 115 aggregations on mixed damaged benthos were investigated, with two unbaited/baited comparisons. Mono-speci®c baits of Aequipecten opercularis, Pecten maximus, Asterias rubens and Buccinum undatum were also studied in single unbaited/baited trials, and then ®nally the effect of damage incurred by Aequipecten opercularis on the ensuing aggregation was investigated by a single undamaged/damaged comparison.
Recommended publications
  • High Level Environmental Screening Study for Offshore Wind Farm Developments – Marine Habitats and Species Project
    High Level Environmental Screening Study for Offshore Wind Farm Developments – Marine Habitats and Species Project AEA Technology, Environment Contract: W/35/00632/00/00 For: The Department of Trade and Industry New & Renewable Energy Programme Report issued 30 August 2002 (Version with minor corrections 16 September 2002) Keith Hiscock, Harvey Tyler-Walters and Hugh Jones Reference: Hiscock, K., Tyler-Walters, H. & Jones, H. 2002. High Level Environmental Screening Study for Offshore Wind Farm Developments – Marine Habitats and Species Project. Report from the Marine Biological Association to The Department of Trade and Industry New & Renewable Energy Programme. (AEA Technology, Environment Contract: W/35/00632/00/00.) Correspondence: Dr. K. Hiscock, The Laboratory, Citadel Hill, Plymouth, PL1 2PB. [email protected] High level environmental screening study for offshore wind farm developments – marine habitats and species ii High level environmental screening study for offshore wind farm developments – marine habitats and species Title: High Level Environmental Screening Study for Offshore Wind Farm Developments – Marine Habitats and Species Project. Contract Report: W/35/00632/00/00. Client: Department of Trade and Industry (New & Renewable Energy Programme) Contract management: AEA Technology, Environment. Date of contract issue: 22/07/2002 Level of report issue: Final Confidentiality: Distribution at discretion of DTI before Consultation report published then no restriction. Distribution: Two copies and electronic file to DTI (Mr S. Payne, Offshore Renewables Planning). One copy to MBA library. Prepared by: Dr. K. Hiscock, Dr. H. Tyler-Walters & Hugh Jones Authorization: Project Director: Dr. Keith Hiscock Date: Signature: MBA Director: Prof. S. Hawkins Date: Signature: This report can be referred to as follows: Hiscock, K., Tyler-Walters, H.
    [Show full text]
  • Fisheries (Southland and Sub-Antarctic Areas Commercial Fishing) Regulations 1986 (SR 1986/220)
    Reprint as at 1 October 2017 Fisheries (Southland and Sub-Antarctic Areas Commercial Fishing) Regulations 1986 (SR 1986/220) Paul Reeves, Governor-General Order in Council At Wellington this 2nd day of September 1986 Present: The Right Hon G W R Palmer presiding in Council Pursuant to section 89 of the Fisheries Act 1983, His Excellency the Governor-Gener- al, acting by and with the advice and consent of the Executive Council, hereby makes the following regulations. Contents Page 1 Title, commencement, and application 4 2 Interpretation 4 Part 1 Southland area Total prohibition 3 Total prohibitions 15 Note Changes authorised by subpart 2 of Part 2 of the Legislation Act 2012 have been made in this official reprint. Note 4 at the end of this reprint provides a list of the amendments incorporated. These regulations are administered by the Ministry for Primary Industries. 1 Fisheries (Southland and Sub-Antarctic Areas Reprinted as at Commercial Fishing) Regulations 1986 1 October 2017 Certain fishing methods prohibited 3A Certain fishing methods prohibited in defined areas 16 3AB Set net fishing prohibited in defined area from Slope Point to Sand 18 Hill Point Minimum set net mesh size 3B Minimum set net mesh size 19 3BA Minimum net mesh for queen scallop trawling 20 Set net soak times 3C Set net soak times 20 3D Restrictions on fishing in paua quota management areas 21 3E Labelling of containers for paua taken in any PAU 5 quota 21 management area 3F Marking of blue cod pots and fish holding pots [Revoked] 21 Trawling 4 Trawling prohibited
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Bivalve Molluscs
    Marine Bivalve Molluscs Marine Bivalve Molluscs Second Edition Elizabeth Gosling This edition first published 2015 © 2015 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd First edition published 2003 © Fishing News Books, a division of Blackwell Publishing Registered Office John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK Editorial Offices 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford, OX4 2DQ, UK The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030‐5774, USA For details of our global editorial offices, for customer services and for information about how to apply for permission to reuse the copyright material in this book please see our website at www.wiley.com/wiley‐blackwell. The right of the author to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, without the prior permission of the publisher. Designations used by companies to distinguish their products are often claimed as trademarks. All brand names and product names used in this book are trade names, service marks, trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The publisher is not associated with any product or vendor mentioned in this book. Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and author(s) have used their best efforts in preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • Diseases Affecting Finfish
    Diseases Affecting Finfish Legislation Ireland's Exotic / Disease Name Acronym Health Susceptible Species Vector Species Non-Exotic Listed National Status Disease Measures Bighead carp (Aristichthys nobilis), goldfish (Carassius auratus), crucian carp (C. carassius), Epizootic Declared Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), redfin common carp and koi carp (Cyprinus carpio), silver carp (Hypophtalmichthys molitrix), Haematopoietic EHN Exotic * Disease-Free perch (Percha fluviatilis) Chub (Leuciscus spp), Roach (Rutilus rutilus), Rudd (Scardinius erythrophthalmus), tench Necrosis (Tinca tinca) Beluga (Huso huso), Danube sturgeon (Acipenser gueldenstaedtii), Sterlet sturgeon (Acipenser ruthenus), Starry sturgeon (Acipenser stellatus), Sturgeon (Acipenser sturio), Siberian Sturgeon (Acipenser Baerii), Bighead carp (Aristichthys nobilis), goldfish (Carassius auratus), Crucian carp (C. carassius), common carp and koi carp (Cyprinus carpio), silver carp (Hypophtalmichthys molitrix), Chub (Leuciscus spp), Roach (Rutilus rutilus), Rudd (Scardinius erythrophthalmus), tench (Tinca tinca) Herring (Cupea spp.), whitefish (Coregonus sp.), North African catfish (Clarias gariepinus), Northern pike (Esox lucius) Catfish (Ictalurus pike (Esox Lucius), haddock (Gadus aeglefinus), spp.), Black bullhead (Ameiurus melas), Channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus), Pangas Pacific cod (G. macrocephalus), Atlantic cod (G. catfish (Pangasius pangasius), Pike perch (Sander lucioperca), Wels catfish (Silurus glanis) morhua), Pacific salmon (Onchorhynchus spp.), Viral
    [Show full text]
  • Predator and Scavenger Aggregation to Discarded By-Catch from Dredge Fisheries: Importance of Damage Level
    Journal of Sea Research 51 (2004) 69–76 www.elsevier.com/locate/seares Short Communication Predator and scavenger aggregation to discarded by-catch from dredge fisheries: importance of damage level S.R. Jenkinsa,b,*, C. Mullena, A.R. Branda a Port Erin Marine Laboratory (University of Liverpool), Port Erin, Isle of Man, British Isles, IM9 6JA, UK b Marine Biological Association, Citadel Hill, Plymouth, PL1 2PB, UK Received 23 October 2002; accepted 22 May 2003 Abstract Predator and scavenger aggregation to simulated discards from a scallop dredge fishery was investigated in the north Irish Sea using an in situ underwater video to determine differences in the response to varying levels of discard damage. The rate and magnitude of scavenger and predator aggregation was assessed using three different types of bait, undamaged, lightly damaged and highly damaged individuals of the great scallop Pecten maximus. In each treatment scallops were agitated for 40 minutes in seawater to simulate the dredging process, then subjected to the appropriate damage level before being tethered loosely in front of the video camera. The density of predators and scavengers at undamaged scallops was low and equivalent to recorded periods with no bait. Aggregation of a range of predators and scavengers occurred at damaged bait. During the 24 hour period following baiting there was a trend of increasing magnitude of predator abundance with increasing damage level. However, badly damaged scallops were eaten quickly and lightly damaged scallops attracted a higher overall magnitude of predator abundance over a longer 4 day period. Large scale temporal variability in predator aggregation to simulated discarded biota was examined by comparison of results with those of a previous study, at the same site, 4 years previously.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 - R.Int.Drv/Rh/Lbrest 2001-01
    Direction des Ressources Vivantes/Ressources Halieutiques/Laboratoire Côtier Brest PITEL Mathilde BERTHOU Patrick FIFAS Spyros fév 2001 - R.INT.DRV/RH/LBREST 2001-01 1 - Dredge design and fisheries Les dragues françaises et la pêcherie 2 - Environnemental impact Impact sur l’environnement 3 - Management Gestion Programme ECODREDGE 1999-2001 Report 1 – Dredge designs and fisheries These 3 reports have been realised during Ecodredge Program (1999-2001) and contribute to a final ECODREDGE report on international dredges designs and fisheries, environnemetal impact and management. REPORT 1 DREDGE DESIGNS AND FISHERIES ECODREDGE Report 1 – Dredge designs and fisheries Table of contents 1 DREDGE DESIGNS....................................................................................... 5 1.1 Manual dredges for sea-shore fishing................................................................... 7 1.1.1 Recreational fisheries....................................................................................... 7 1.1.2 Professional fisheries........................................................................................ 7 1.2 Flexible Dredges for King scallops (Pecten maximus)......................................... 9 1.3 Flexible and rigid dredges for Warty venus (Venus verrucosa) ....................... 14 1.4 Flexible Dredge for Queen scallops (Chlamys varia, Chlamys opercularia)..... 18 1.5 Rigid Dredges for small bivalves......................................................................... 19 1.6 Flexible Dredge for Mussels
    [Show full text]
  • Determination of the Abundance and Population Structure of Buccinum Undatum in North Wales
    Determination of the Abundance and Population Structure of Buccinum undatum in North Wales Zara Turtle Marine Environmental Protection MSc Redacted version September 2014 School of Ocean Sciences Bangor University Bangor University Bangor Gwynedd Wales LL57 2DG Declaration This work has not previously been accepted in substance for any degree and is not being currently submitted for any degree. This dissertation is being submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirement of the M.Sc. in Marine Environmental Protection. The dissertation is the result of my own independent work / investigation, except where otherwise stated. Other sources are acknowledged by footnotes giving explicit references and a bibliography is appended. I hereby give consent for my dissertation, if accepted, to be made available for photocopying and for inter-library loan, and the title and summary to be made available to outside organisations. Signed: Date: 12/09/2014 i Determination of the Abundance and Population Structure of Buccinum undatum in North Wales Zara Turtle Abstract A mark-recapture study and fisheries data analysis for the common whelk, Buccinum undatum, was undertaken for catches on a commercial fishing vessel operating from The fishing location, north Wales, from June-July 2014. Laboratory experiments were conducted on B.undatum to investigate tag retention rates and behavioural responses after being exposed to a number of treatments. Thick rubber bands were found to have a 100 % tag retention rate after four months. Riddling, tagging and air exposure do not affect the behavioural responses of B.undatum. The mark-recapture study was used to estimate population size and movement. 4007 whelks were tagged with thick rubber bands over three tagging events.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylum MOLLUSCA Chitons, Bivalves, Sea Snails, Sea Slugs, Octopus, Squid, Tusk Shell
    Phylum MOLLUSCA Chitons, bivalves, sea snails, sea slugs, octopus, squid, tusk shell Bruce Marshall, Steve O’Shea with additional input for squid from Neil Bagley, Peter McMillan, Reyn Naylor, Darren Stevens, Di Tracey Phylum Aplacophora In New Zealand, these are worm-like molluscs found in sandy mud. There is no shell. The tiny MOLLUSCA solenogasters have bristle-like spicules over Chitons, bivalves, sea snails, sea almost the whole body, a groove on the underside of the body, and no gills. The more worm-like slugs, octopus, squid, tusk shells caudofoveates have a groove and fewer spicules but have gills. There are 10 species, 8 undescribed. The mollusca is the second most speciose animal Bivalvia phylum in the sea after Arthropoda. The phylum Clams, mussels, oysters, scallops, etc. The shell is name is taken from the Latin (molluscus, soft), in two halves (valves) connected by a ligament and referring to the soft bodies of these creatures, but hinge and anterior and posterior adductor muscles. most species have some kind of protective shell Gills are well-developed and there is no radula. and hence are called shellfish. Some, like sea There are 680 species, 231 undescribed. slugs, have no shell at all. Most molluscs also have a strap-like ribbon of minute teeth — the Scaphopoda radula — inside the mouth, but this characteristic Tusk shells. The body and head are reduced but Molluscan feature is lacking in clams (bivalves) and there is a foot that is used for burrowing in soft some deep-sea finned octopuses. A significant part sediments. The shell is open at both ends, with of the body is muscular, like the adductor muscles the narrow tip just above the sediment surface for and foot of clams and scallops, the head-foot of respiration.
    [Show full text]
  • Ambient Concentrations of Selected Organochlorines in Estuaries
    Ambient concentrations of selected organochlorines in estuaries Organochlorines Programme Ministry for the Environment June 1999 Authors Sue Scobie Simon J Buckland Howard K Ellis Ray T Salter Organochlorines in New Zealand: Ambient concentrations of selected organochlorines in estuaries Published by Ministry for the Environment PO Box 10-362 Wellington ISBN 0 478 09036 6 First published November 1998 Revised June 1999 Printed on elemental chlorine free 50% recycled paper Foreword People around the world are concerned about organochlorine contaminants in the environment. Research has established that even the most remote regions of the world are affected by these persistent chemicals. Organochlorines, as gases or attached to dust, are transported vast distances by air and ocean currents – they have been found even in polar regions. Organochlorines are stored in body fat and accumulate through the food chain. Even a low concentration of emission to the environment can contribute in the long term to significant risks to the health of animals, including birds, marine mammals and humans. The contaminants of concern include dioxins (by-products of combustion and of some industrial processes), PCBs, and a number of chlorinated pesticides (for example, DDT and dieldrin). These chemicals have not been used in New Zealand for many years. But a number of industrial sites are contaminated, and dioxins continue to be released in small but significant quantities. In view of the international concern, the Government decided that we needed better information on the New Zealand situation. The Ministry for the Environment was asked to establish an Organochlorines Programme to carry out research, assess the data, and to consider management issues such as clean up targets and emission control standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Shellfish Size at Maturity Review
    Shellfish Size at Maturity Review Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 2 American hard-shelled clam (Mercenaria mercenaria) ............................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Crawfish (Palinurus spp.) ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Edible/brown crab (Cancer pagurus) ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Grooved carpetshell clam (Ruditapes decussatus) ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Lobster (Homarus gammarus) ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Manila clam (Ruditapes philippinarum)
    [Show full text]
  • Pecten Maximus) Sea-Ranching in Norway – Lessons Learned
    Scallop (Pecten maximus) sea-ranching in Norway – lessons learned Ellen Sofie Grefsrud, Tore Strohmeier & Øivind Strand Background - Sea ranching in Norway • 1990-1997: Program to develop and encourage sea ranching (PUSH) • Focus on four species • Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) • Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) • Arctic char (Salvelinus alpinus) • European lobster (Homarus gammarus) • Only lobster showed an economic potential Grefsrud et. al, 6th ISSESR, 11-14 November, Sarasota FL, USA Background - Scallop sea ranching • 1980-90’s – a growing interest on scallop Pecten maximus cultivation in Norway • Based on suspended culture (1980’s) – labour costs high • European concensus that seeding on bottom was the most viable option • First experimental releases i Norway in mid-1990’s Photo: IMR Photo: IMR Grefsrud et. al, 6th ISSESR, 11-14 November, Sarasota FL, USA Production model Pecten maximus • Hatchery + nursery – larvae + 2-20 mm shell height • Intermediate culture – 20-55 mm • Grow-out on seabed – 55->100 mm Photo: IMR Three production steps to lower risk for investors and increase the profit in each step Time aspect – four-five years from hatchery to market sized scallops Grefsrud et. al, 6th ISSESR, 11-14 November, Sarasota FL, USA Hatchery + nursery • Established a commercial hatchery, Scalpro Photo: S. Andersen • Industry + research developed methodolgy for producing spat on a commercial scale • Larvae phase • Antibiotics and probiotica to prevent bacterial outbreaks (early phase) • Continous flow-through in larvae tank and increased volume • No use of antibiotics in commercial production • From hatching to spat in about three weeks Photo: IMR Grefsrud et. al, 6th ISSESR, 11-14 November, Sarasota FL, USA Hatchery + nursery • Transferred from hatchery to nursery in the sea at 2-4 mm • Land based race-way system – 2-20 mm Photo: IMR • Flow-through filtered sea water • Reduced predation and fouling • The commercial hatchery, Scalpro, covered both the hatchey and nursery phase Photo: IMR Grefsrud et.
    [Show full text]
  • Amnesic Shellfish Poisoning Toxins in Bivalve Molluscs in Ireland
    Amnesic shellfish poisoning toxins in bivalve molluscs in Ireland Kevin J. Jamesa,*, Marion Gillmana,Mo´nica Ferna´ndez Amandia, Ame´rico Lo´pez-Riverab, Patricia Ferna´ndez Puentea, Mary Lehanea, Simon Mitrovica, Ambrose Fureya aPROTEOBIO, Mass Spectrometry Centre for Proteomics and Biotoxin Research, Department of Chemistry, Cork Institute of Technology, Bishopstown, Cork, Ireland bMarine Toxins Laboratory, Biomedical Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile Abstract In December 1999, domoic acid (DA) a potent neurotoxin, responsible for the syndrome Amnesic Shellfish Poisoning (ASP) was detected for the first time in shellfish harvested in Ireland. Two liquid chromatography (LC) methods were applied to quantify DA in shellfish after sample clean-up using solid-phase extraction (SPE) with strong anion exchange (SAX) cartridges. Toxin detection was achieved using photodiode array ultraviolet (LC-UV) and multiple tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MSn). DA was identified in four species of bivalve shellfish collected along the west and south coastal regions of the Republic of Ireland. The amount of DA that was present in three species was within EU guideline limits for sale of shellfish (20 mg DA/g); mussels (Mytilus edulis), !1.0 mg DA/g; oysters (Crassostrea edulis), !5.0 mg DA/g and razor clams (Ensis siliqua), !0.3 mg DA/g. However, king scallops (Pecten maximus) posed a significant human health hazard with levels up to 240 mg DA/g total tissues. Most scallop samples (55%) contained DA at levels greater than the regulatory limit. The DA levels in the digestive glands of some samples of scallops were among the highest that have ever been recorded (2820 mg DA/g).
    [Show full text]