DOCSLIB.ORG

Beijing and the Korean Crisis, June 1950-June 1951 Author(S): Michael H

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Beijing and the Korean Crisis, June 1950-June 1951 Author(S): Michael H Beijing and the Korean Crisis, June 1950-June 1951 Author(s): Michael H. Hunt Reviewed work(s): Source: Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 107, No. 3 (Autumn, 1992), pp. 453-478 Published by: The Academy of Political Science Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2152440 . Accessed: 27/04/2012 02:35 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The Academy of Political Science is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Political Science Quarterly. http://www.jstor.org Beijingand the KoreanCrisis, June 1950-June1951 MICHAEL H. HUNT Our understanding of the Korean War and especially the crisis- filled first year of that war has undergone some dramatic changes. Through the 1980s, approaching the fortieth anniversary of the outbreak of the war, some twenty books appeared dealing with the war's politics, diplomacy, and strategy.' The late Gregory Henderson, writing in an elegiac vein, acknowledged this new era in scholarship. "The men who lived the Korean War now pass. A new genera- tion, eyes deep in mountains of documents declassified up to 1954, claims the old fields. The headiness of those years for us who lived them ebbs. We come, cooly [sic] enmeshed in footnotes, to the scribes' time."2 The scribes have been busiest rewriting American policy and Anglo-American relations during the war. Perhaps as much as anything, the appearance between 1976 and 1984 of the relevant volumes in the U.S. foreign relations series and the clock-like opening of pertinent materials in the British Public Records Office stimulated this fresh research. New accounts have also brought the role of Ko- I A count that included military and campaign histories would go substantially higher. The findings of Bruce Cumings, Rosemary Foot, Burton I. Kaufman, Callum A. MacDonald, and others have served cumulatively to displace David Rees, Korea: The Limited War (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1964), the standard treatment for at least twenty years. For recent reviews of the new literature, see Rosemary Foot, "Making Known the Unknown War: Policy Analysis of the Korean Conflict in the Last Decade," Diplomatic History 15 (Summer 1991): 411-31; and Philip West, "Interpreting the Korean War," American Historical Review 94 (February 1989): 80-96. 2 Gregory Henderson, book review, Journal of Asian Studies 47 (May 1988): 389. MICHAEL H. HUNT, professor of history at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, is the author of Ideology and U.S. Foreign Policy and The Making of a Special Relationship, which is a study of early U.S.-China ties. He is now completing a book on the origins of Chinese Communist foreign policy. Political Science Quarterly Volume 107 Number 3 1992 453 454 | POLITICAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY reans into clearerfocus. IntegratingKorean sources with the English-language literature,those accountshave focusedattention on the peninsularorigins of the war and the interactionbetween the great powersand the local actors, between internationalpolitics and local politics. On a thirdfront, Sovietinvolvement, the first volumeof Nikita Khrushchev'smemoirs opened up some intriguinginsights in 1970, and the 1990 volume has offered some supplementarydetails. But in general, our view on the Kremlinremained limited in the age of glasnost, and little has yet changednow in the age of Boris Yeltsin.3 The Chineserole has, at leastuntil recently,been only marginallybetter under- stood. Whetherand when the Chinese might release illuminatingmaterial on the war has been a subject of occasional, generallypessimistic comment.4 But the Chinese are making their own contributionto our understandingof the war, helping us to move beyond the point researchersrelying heavily on the contemporarypublic record had carried US.5 Thanks to new material China'sintrusion into the narrativeneed no longerbe accompaniedby a relentless rain of speculationand misinformation.We can now correct misconceptions by nonspecialistsintent on a more global view of the war,6 subject undocu- mented claims to critical scrutiny,7and begin to nail down such vital but elu- 3 See John Merrill, review article, Journal of Korean Studies 3 (1981): 181-91, for a helpful appraisal of Nikita S. Khrushchev, Khrushchev Remembers, Strobe Talbott, trans. and ed., 2 vols. (Boston: Little, Brown, 1970 and 1974). See also Khrushchev Remembers: The Glasnost Tapes, Jerrold L. Schecter with Vyacheslav V. Luchkov, trans. and eds. (Boston: Little, Brown, 1990), 143- 47. For recent revelations, perhaps a harbinger, see the Reuters report from Moscow, "Ex-North Korea Envoy Says Kim Started War," New York Times, 6 July 1990; and N. Anin (pseud.), "How the War in Korea Started," Newsreview, 13 July 1991, 31, and 20 July 1991, 29, and 27 July 1991, 30. Milton Leitenberg was kind enough to supply me with a copy of the latter item. 4For example, Max Hastings writing in 1987 suggested that the Chinese records are either lost or forever sealed. "It may never be possible to piece together the precise decision-making process in Peking that led to the order to enter Korea. Almost all the key participants are dead, and among the living there is no reliable body of records to enable even those who wish to establish the objective truth about recent Chinese political history to do so." Hastings, The Korean War (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1987), 132. Edwin P. Hoyt, The Day the Chinese Attacked: Korea, 1950 (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1990), 144, is similarly pessimistic. 5 Allen S. Whiting, China Crosses the Yalu: The Decision to Enter the Korean War (originally published 1960, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1968), a meticulous reconstruction of Chinese signalling from June to November 1950, is the best known and most influential of these works based primarily on the public record. 6 Take for example the basic error of making Lin Biao the commander of the Chinese "volunteers" in Korea in Joseph C. Goulden, Korea: The Untold Story of the War (New York: Times Books, 1982), 309; and Clay Blair, TheForgotten War:America in Korea, 1950-53 (New York: Times Books, 1987), 390, 396. 7See for example the imaginative treatment of Chinese decision making in October and November 1950 in Russell Spurr, Enter the Dragon: China's Undeclared War against the U.S. in Korea, 1950- 51 (New York: Newmarket Press, 1988). Spurr fails to indicate precisely how the interviews in China on which he relies so heavily support his narrative. Hoyt, The Day the Chinese Attacked, a somewhat better grounded account, also dispenses with precise documentation. BEIJING AND THE KOREAN CRISIS | 455 sive topics as the domesticimpact of the war8and its effects on Sino-Sovietre- lations.9 The creditfor this advanceon the Chinesefront of the KoreanWar, but one aspect of a broad movementto develop and open up party history, goes to the Communistparty central committee itself. Much of the headwaymade through the 1980swas dueto the efforts of threehistorical units in Beijingoperating under the directsupervision of a centralcommittee "small group."'0 The partycenter's own researchoffices have put out a wide variety of materialrelevant to Mao Zedong'scentral role in the crisis as well as the context in which he operated."I Adding significantlyto the literature,the Chinesemilitary itself has promoted researchand publicationon a topic in whichit takes considerablepride. Officers who played a prominentrole in the conflict together with militaryresearchers have producedan impressivebody of work, much of it publishedby one or another of the military-runpresses.-2 These various secondarytreatments and 8 The most ambitious study to date is Larry S. Weiss, "Storm Around the Cradle: The Korean War and the Early Years of the People's Republic of China" (Ph.D. dissertation in Political Science, Columbia University, 1981), which contends that the war radicalized China's domestic policy, thus bringing to a premature end the New Democracy stage of China's development. I See RobertR. Simmons,The StrainedAlliance: Peking, Pyongyang,Moscow and the Politics of the Korean War (New York: Free Press, 1975); Wilbur A. Chaffee, "Two Hypotheses of Sino- Soviet Relations as Concerns the Instigation of the Korean War," Journal of Korean Affairs 6 (1976- 77): 1-13; and Nakajima Mineo, "The Sino-Soviet Confrontation: Its Roots in the International Background of the Korean War," Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs 1 (January 1979): 19-47. 10 For a fuller treatment of developments over the last decade, see Michael H. Hunt and Odd Arne Westad, "The Chinese Communist Party and International Affairs: A Field Report on New Historical Sources and Old Research Problems," China Quarterly 122 (Summer 1990): 258-72. For an updated listing of sources, see Steven M. Goldstein and He Di, "New Chinese Sources on the History of the Cold War,"Cold WarInternational History Project Bulletin 1 (Spring1992): 4-6. " Zhonggong zhongyang wenxian yanjiushi, comp., Jianguo yilai Mao Zedong wengao [Mao Zedong manuscripts for the period following the establishment of the country], 5 vols. to date, internal circulation (Beijing: Zhongyang wenxian, 1987), vols.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • New Trends in Mao Literature from China
    Kölner China-Studien Online Arbeitspapiere zu Politik, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft Chinas Cologne China Studies Online Working Papers on Chinese Politics, Economy and Society No. 1 / 1995 Thomas Scharping The Man, the Myth, the Message: New Trends in Mao Literature From China Zusammenfassung: Dies ist die erweiterte Fassung eines früher publizierten englischen Aufsatzes. Er untersucht 43 Werke der neueren chinesischen Mao-Literatur aus den frühen 1990er Jahren, die in ihnen enthaltenen Aussagen zur Parteigeschichte und zum Selbstverständnis der heutigen Führung. Neben zahlreichen neuen Informationen über die chinesische Innen- und Außenpolitik, darunter besonders die Kampagnen der Mao-Zeit wie Großer Sprung und Kulturrevolution, vermitteln die Werke wichtige Einblicke in die politische Kultur Chinas. Trotz eindeutigen Versuchen zur Durchsetzung einer einheitlichen nationalen Identität und Geschichtsschreibung bezeugen sie auch die Existenz eines unabhängigen, kritischen Denkens in China. Schlagworte: Mao Zedong, Parteigeschichte, Ideologie, Propaganda, Historiographie, politische Kultur, Großer Sprung, Kulturrevolution Autor: Thomas Scharping ([email protected]) ist Professor für Moderne China-Studien, Lehrstuhl für Neuere Geschichte / Politik, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft Chinas, an der Universität Köln. Abstract: This is the enlarged version of an English article published before. It analyzes 43 works of the new Chinese Mao literature from the early 1990s, their revelations of Party history and their clues for the self-image of the present leadership. Besides revealing a wealth of new information on Chinese domestic and foreign policy, in particular on the campaigns of the Mao era like the Great Leap and the Cultural Revolution, the works convey important insights into China’s political culture. In spite of the overt attempts at forging a unified national identity and historiography, they also document the existence of independent, critical thought in China.
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript Pas been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissenation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from anytype of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely. event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material bad to beremoved, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with smalloverlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back ofthe book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI A Bell &Howell Information Company 300North Zeeb Road. Ann Arbor. MI48106-1346 USA 313!761-47oo 800:521·0600 THE LIN BIAO INCIDENT: A STUDY OF EXTRA-INSTITUTIONAL FACTORS IN THE CULTURAL REVOLUTION A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN HISTORY AUGUST 1995 By Qiu Jin Dissertation Committee: Stephen Uhalley, Jr., Chairperson Harry Lamley Sharon Minichiello John Stephan Roger Ames UMI Number: 9604163 OMI Microform 9604163 Copyright 1995, by OMI Company.
    [Show full text]
  • How Do Asians See Their Future?
    HOW DO ASIANS SEE THEIR FUTURE? edited by François Godement ABOUT ECFR The European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR) is the first pan-European think-tank. Launched in October 2007, its objective is to conduct research and promote informed debate across Europe on the development of coherent, effective and values-based European foreign policy. ECFR has developed a strategy with three distinctive elements that define its activities: • A pan-European Council. ECFR has brought together a distinguished Council of over two hundred Members – politicians, decision makers, thinkers and business people from the EU’s member states and candidate countries – which meets once a year as a full body. Council Members provide ECFR staff with advice and feedback on policy ideas and help with ECFR’s activities within their own countries. The Council is chaired by Carl Bildt, Emma Bonino and Mabel van Oranje. • A physical presence in the main EU member states. ECFR, uniquely among European think- tanks, has offices in Berlin, London, Madrid, Paris, Rome, Sofia and Warsaw. Our offices are platforms for research, debate, advocacy and communications. • A distinctive research and policy development process. ECFR has brought together a team of distinguished researchers and practitioners from all over Europe to advance its objectives through innovative projects with a pan-European focus. ECFR’s activities include primary research, publication of policy reports, private meetings and public debates, ‘friends of ECFR’ gatherings in EU capitals and outreach to strategic media outlets. ECFR is a not-for-profit organisation supported by a range of donors. Our work would not be possible without the generous support of these donors allowing us to publish our ideas and advocate for a values-based foreign policy for Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • The Korean War
    CHAPTER 1 Fathers and sons Was it for this the clay grew tall? Wilfred Owen, ‘Futility’ he bright moon plays on that ragged, dangerous ridgeline. TDown in the valley men sit in a circle. Keith, Denis, Sam, Titch and Ron are not ready for sleep. It would be good to have a fi re to keep away shadows and thoughts of tomorrow. It would be good to have a beer. Not this night, but they do sing a drinking song. It’s a song Denis carried in his memory from another war on another continent, sad, angry, defi ant, written fi rst as a poem for soldiers in the 19th century and adopted as an anthem by some their 20th century descendants. Stand to Your Glasses is a variation of the universal theme of young men far from home and facing death. On a battle eve they sing: Who dreads to the dust returning? Who shrinks from the sable shore? Where the high and haughty yearning Of the soul will be no more. 1 TThehe kkoreanorean wwar.inddar.indd 1 99/9/10/9/10 99:43:36:43:36 AAMM THE KOREAN WAR There is not time for repentance, ’Tis folly to yield to despair When a shudder may fi nish a sentence Or death put an end to a prayer. Both Confederate and Union soldiers sang the song during the American Civil War and World War I airmen made it their own: We loop in the purple twilight, We spin in silvery dawn, With a trail of smoke behind us, To show where our comrades have gone.
    [Show full text]
  • New Trends in Mao Literature from China
    Kölner China-Studien Online Arbeitspapiere zu Politik, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft Chinas Cologne China Studies Online Working Papers on Chinese Politics, Economy and Society No. 1 / 1995 Thomas Scharping The Man, the Myth, the Message: New Trends in Mao Literature From China Zusammenfassung: Dies ist die erweiterte Fassung eines früher publizierten englischen Aufsatzes. Er untersucht 43 Werke der neueren chinesischen Mao-Literatur aus den frühen 1990er Jahren, die in ihnen enthaltenen Aussagen zur Parteigeschichte und zum Selbstverständnis der heutigen Führung. Neben zahlreichen neuen Informationen über die chinesische Innen- und Außenpolitik, darunter besonders die Kampagnen der Mao-Zeit wie Großer Sprung und Kulturrevolution, vermitteln die Werke wichtige Einblicke in die politische Kultur Chinas. Trotz eindeutigen Versuchen zur Durchsetzung einer einheitlichen nationalen Identität und Geschichtsschreibung bezeugen sie auch die Existenz eines unabhängigen, kritischen Denkens in China. Schlagworte: Mao Zedong, Parteigeschichte, Ideologie, Propaganda, Historiographie, politische Kultur, Großer Sprung, Kulturrevolution Autor: Thomas Scharping ([email protected]) ist Professor für Moderne China-Studien, Lehrstuhl für Neuere Geschichte / Politik, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft Chinas, an der Universität Köln. Abstract: This is the enlarged version of an English article published before. It analyzes 43 works of the new Chinese Mao literature from the early 1990s, their revelations of Party history and their clues for the self-image of the present leadership. Besides revealing a wealth of new information on Chinese domestic and foreign policy, in particular on the campaigns of the Mao era like the Great Leap and the Cultural Revolution, the works convey important insights into China’s political culture. In spite of the overt attempts at forging a unified national identity and historiography, they also document the existence of independent, critical thought in China.
    [Show full text]
  • (1893-1976) Mao Zedong Led China's Communist Revolution in The
    Mao Zedong 1 (1893-1976) Mao Zedong led China's Communist revolution in the 1920s and 1930s and became chairman (chief of state) of the People's Republic of China in 1949, an office he held until 1959. From "Mao Zedong." Microsoft Encarta Encyclopedia 2001. Mao Zedong was the foremost Chinese Communist leader of the 20th century and the principal founder of the People's Republic of China. Mao was born December 26, 1893, into a peasant family in the village of Shaoshan, Hunan province. His father was a strict disciplinarian and Mao frequently rebelled against his authority. Mao's early education was in the Confucian classics of Chinese history, literature, and philosophy, but early teachers also exposed him to the ideas of progressive Confucian reformers such as K'ang Yu-wei. In 1911 Mao moved to the provincial capital, Changsha, where he briefly served as a soldier in Republican army in the 1911 revolution that overthrew the Qing dynasty. While in Changsha, Mao read works on Western philosophy; he was also greatly influenced by progressive newspapers and by journals such as New Youth, founded by revolutionary leader Chen Duxiu. In 1918, after graduating from the Hunan Teachers College in Changsha, Mao traveled to Beijing and obtained a job in the Beijing University library under the head librarian, Li Dazhao. Mao joined Li's study group that explored Marxist political and social thought and he became an avid reader of Marxist writings. During the May Fourth Movement of 1919, when students and intellectuals called for China's modernization, Mao published articles criticizing the traditional values of Confucianism.
    [Show full text]
  • The China Quarterly 189:-1 Book Reviews
    Book Reviews 205 Law that emphasized love within marriage. He fails to recognize that prior to the Maoist era, males frequently sought out love through patronizing courtesans, and that as a result of the New Culture movement, both males and females were encouraged to seek love through marriage. Failure to examine the issue in its historical context shakes the author's argument that the CCP policy contributes to the changing sexual culture. While a major theme of the book is the complexity of the interaction between state governance and individual rights, at least in certain areas, the state has maintained a repressive role. For instance, as Li Yinhe points out in her chapter, the state continues to apprehend and interrogate gay men. Gary Sigley also criticizes the state's repression and prohibition of premarital and extramarital sex for the purpose of maintaining stability. This book weaves in a wealth of knowledge about the intertwined relationships between the changing sexual culture in China and the government policy, in an effort to show the complexity of a state that both creates and regulates the new spaces of sexual entrepreneurship and consumption, and the new forms of sexuality. It will be welcomed by a wide array of scholars who have an interest in sexuality studies in contemporary China. TIANTIANZHENG Mao: The Unknown Story. JUNGCHANGANDJONHALLIDAY London: Jonathan Cape, 2005 814 pp. £25.00 ISBN 0-224-07126-2 doi:10.1017/S030574100600107X Mao: The Unknown Story is a very singular piece of work. The authors claim that their book is the only full and truly objective account of Mao's life ever published.
    [Show full text]
  • A Floating History: the Korean War and China's
    A FLOATING HISTORY: THE KOREAN WAR AND CHINA’S POLITICAL USE OF WAR MEMORY A Thesis submitted to the FaCulty of the Graduate SChool of Arts and SCiences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in CommuniCation, Culture, and TeChnology By Huazhi Qin, LL.B. Washington, D.C. April 21, 2020 Copyright 2020 by Huazhi Qin All Rights Reserved ii A FLOATING HISTORY: THE KOREAN WAR AND CHINA’S POLITICAL USE OF WAR MEMORY Huazhi Qin, M.A. Thesis Advisor: Diana Owen, Ph.D. ABSTRACT The Korean War has served as one of the Crucial historiCal confliCts in China’s relations with other countries, espeCially with the United States. However, the narrative of the offiCial memory and the meaning of the War in China have Changed dramatiCally from the wartime period to the present. Based on textual and content analysis, the thesis tries to explore the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)’s politiCal use of the Korean War and relevant memory through the lens of offiCial documentaries. The thesis looks into six series of offiCial documentaries whiCh Cover three historiCal periods: the 1950s, the early 1990s and the 21st Century. It adopts an analytiC framework to look into four types of messages: Constitutive norms, relational contents, cognitive contents, and social purposes. Then it analyzes the link between the narrative and the CCP’s politiCal purposes in eaCh period and makes a longitudinal Comparison to disCuss ConsistenCy and inconsistency of the memory. The thesis Concludes that the structural frame of the War itself remains Constant since the wartime period while the speCifiC interpretation of the War has changed dramatiCally over time.
    [Show full text]
  • Casualty Figures Communist Forces in Korean War All Numbers from Chinese Sources
    Casualty Figures Communist Forces in Korean War All Numbers from Chinese Sources Missing in Country Dead Wounded Hospitalized POWs Total Action Chinese People's Volunteer Forces 152,000 383,000 450,000 21,700 4,000 1,010,700 (CPVF) North Korean People's Army - - - - - 520,000 (NKPA) Communist Forces - - - - - 1,530,700 Total China Airplanes Vehicles Cost Supplies Destroyed in War 399 12,916 $3,300,000,000 5,600,000 Tons Casualty Figures United Nations Forces The United States Armed Forces suffered 33,665 Americans killed in action in Korea; 3,275 died there from non-hostile causes. *TOTAL: 36,940 Americans gave their lives in the Korean Theater. There were 92,134 Americans wounded in action in 103,284 incidents. A total of 1,789,000 Americans served in the Korean theater during the Korean War from June 25, 1950 to July 27, 1953. There are still 8,176 MIAs. South Korea sustained 1,312,836 military casualties, including 415,004 dead; casualties among other United Nations allies totaled 16,532, including 3,094 dead. *Source: Office of Secretary of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (WHS/DIOR); Defense Prisoners of War/Missing in Action Office (DPMO). Data released 10January 2000. Country Dead Wounded and Missing Total Australia 339 1,245 1,584 Belgium 97 355 452 Canada 309 1,235 1,544 Colombia 140 517 657 Ethiopia 120 536 656 France 288 836 1,124 Greece 169 545 714 Netherlands 111 593 704 New Zealand 31 78 109 Philippines 92 356 448 1 South Africa 20 16 36 Thailand 114 799 913 Turkey 717 2,413 3,130 United Kingdom 670 2,692 3,362 Korea According to figures published in the Soviet Union, 11.1% of the total population of North Korea died, which indicates that around 1,130,000 people were killed.
    [Show full text]
  • China's Robber Barons
    CHINA’S ROBBER BARONS NO.2, 2003 BY LIU XIAOBO CHINA RIGHTS FORUM The ongoing debate in China over whether to the New Left seems to be shifting the blame; their defense of 73 recognize private property rights as constitu- the socialist constitution arises from their worship of Mao Zedong and a desire to conceal the actual roots of the elite tional rights must take into account privatiza- privatization system. tion of political power, Liu Xiaobo writes. While The roots of Chinese-style elite privatization is not a capi- officials at all levels turn their control of public talist market system centered on the protection of private property and free competition. Rather, it is the dictatorial resources into private wealth, equitable distri- system, in itself a privatization of public political power, ON THE GROUND bution of property depends on abolishing con- which leads to privatization of property through the elite. Privatization of public power is not a special product of the trol by clan-based power monopolies. reform era, but rather is characteristic of a political system that has allowed the Chinese Communist government to develop China’s present reform of property ownership, with its focus into the ultimate totalitarian regime. It could be said that on making private property rights constitutional, has become clarifying the essence of the Chinese Communist Party’s power a hot topic in every segment of Chinese society.One of the is the key to understanding the current problem of property points currently under debate in intellectual circles is whether rights; but clarifying the essence of the Party’s power is no property rights reform can be implemented on the premise of easy matter since the Party has begun to accept market liquidating illicit wealth.
    [Show full text]
  • Selected Works of Mao Tse-Tung
    WORKERS OF ALL COUNTRIES, UNITE! SELECTED WORKS OF MAO TSE-TUNG Volume VII Originally published by Kranti Publications Foreign Languages Press Foreign Languages Press Collection ‘‘Works of Maoism’’ #3 Contact - [email protected] https://foreignlanguages.press Paris, 2020 First edition, Kranti Publications, Secunderabad, 1991 Second edition, Foreign Languages Press, Paris, 2020 ISBN: 978-2-491182-24-3 This book is under license Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ Note from Foreign Languages Press It’s with great joy that we release this new printing of Volume VII of the “Unofficial”Selected Works of Mao Zedong. This volume was initially released by our Indian comrades from Kranti Publications in 1991, but was out of stock by the end of the 90s and has since been unavailable in hard copy or online. This volume covers the period from the founding of the People’s Republic (October 1949) until the Great Leap Forward (1958) and contains 478 doc- uments that are not included in the “Official” Volume V of the Selected Works that covered this period. While the “Official” Volume V gave us access to documents reflecting Chairman Mao’s philosophy, as well as his ideas regarding the development of the economy, this volume is mainly composed of his letters and telegrams showing all the difficulties that the chairman of the newly founded People’s Republic of China had to face, including the danger of imperialist aggres- sions as seen during the Korean War (1950-1953), the delicate situation of national minorities in Xinjiang and Tibet and the complexity of diplomacy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Korean War and Sino–North Korean Friendship 朝鮮戦争と 中朝友好関係
    Volume 11 | Issue 32 | Number 4 | Article ID 3982 | Aug 08, 2013 The Asia-Pacific Journal | Japan Focus The Korean War and Sino–North Korean Friendship 朝鮮戦争と 中朝友好関係 Heonik Kwon The relationship between China and North Korea is a subject that attracts much discussion and speculation in today’s policy circles and media. The history of Sino–North Korean friendship is typically traced to the time of the Korean War (1950–1953), although in North Korea it tends to go further back, to the colonial period. The texture of this international friendship has been changing recently. Some Chinese leaders state that China’s friendship with North Korea is no longer a special one and that the two countries have, or should have, a “normal” interstate relationship—respecting mutual interests as well as certain international norms—rather than one that is historically determined and unchanging. In North Korea, by contrast, there Image depicting Sino–North Korean war alliance has been renewed interest in reinventing its relationship with China as a historicallyFriendship and kinship constituted and durable friendship. This essay explores North Korea’s recent efforts to In the history of anthropological research, present its relationship with China as a special, studies of human friendship have developed in extraordinary, revolutionary friendship. It will close interaction with those of human kinship focus on how the making of this special relations. Kinship is a milieu of relations we are friendship draws upon a set of powerful ideas born into, thus making up ascribed and given and metaphors of kinship and consanguinity. relationships, in contrast to friendship, which is First, however, a few words on kinship and something we construct in the course of our friendship concepts.
    [Show full text]