DOCSLIB.ORG

Biennial Report 2015 – 2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The Czech Academy of Sciences INSTITUTE OF VERTEBRATE BIOLOGY BIENNIAL REPORT 2015 –2016 BRNO 2017 BIENNIAL REPORT INSTITUTE OF VERTEBRATE BIOLOGY the Czech Academy of Sciences 2015–2016 BRNO 2017 BIENNIAL REPORT 2015–2016 A periodical continuation of the Institute’s previous bulletins: Vertebratologické Zprávy (1969–1987), Zprávy ÚSEB (1988–1991) and the ILE Biennial Report (1993–1994). Edited by Josef Bryja, Alena Fornůsková, Jan Zima, Hana Slabáková, and Marcel Honza Published by the Institute of Vertebrate Biology of the CAS, v. v. i., Brno English correction by Kevin Roche Layout and pre-press by Jiří Kaláček Printed by H.R.G. Litomyšl © Institute of Vertebrate Biology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, v. v. i. Front cover: Smooth newt, Lissotriton vulgaris, as a model system for behavioural thermoregulation research in ectothermic vertebrates. (Photo by L. Gvoždík) Back cover: a) Aerial respirometry system for measuring energy metabolism in small vertebrates. (Photo by L. Gvoždík) b) Water temperature measurements over an aquatic thermal gradient, photographed using a thermal imaging camera. (Photo by L. Gvoždík) ISBN 978-80-87189-22-1 CONTENTS PREFACE . 5 1. BASIC FACTS ........................................................................... 7 | STRUCTURE OF THE INSTITUTE OF VERTEBRATE BIOLOGY OF THE CAS ................... 7 | STAFF AND BUDGET ................................................................... 8 Addresses ...............................................................................11 | HEADQUARTERS......................................................................11 | RESEARCH FACILITIES ................................................................11 | FIELD STATION .......................................................................11 | MANAGEMENT AND SERVICES ........................................................11 | BOARD OF THE INSTITUTE.............................................................12 | SUPERVISORY BOARD.................................................................13 | RESEARCH STAFF .....................................................................13 2. RESEARCH PROJECTS ..................................................................19 Projects supported by the Czech Science Foundation (GA ČR) . 19 Projects supported by the Technology Agency of the Czech Republic (TA ČR) . 21 Projects supported by the Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic . 21 Projects supported by the Ministry of Enviroment of the Czech Republic . 21 Projects supported by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport . 21 International projects . 22 3. SCIENTIFIC RESULTS ...................................................................23 | SUMMARY OF PUBLICATION OUTPUT . .23 RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS . 25 Geographical distribution of selected research activities abroad . 26 Most important research collaborations . 28 Complete list of publications . 29 Books, textbooks, edited proceedings . 29 Chapters in books . 30 Papers in journals included in the databases Web of Science . 30 Papers in other refereed journals . 46 Papers in proceedings . 47 Book reviews . 47 Popularization books and articles . 47 SELECTED SCIENTIFIC ACHIEVEMENTS ....................................................49 EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY . 52 BIODIVERSITY . 66 PARASITES AND DISEASES . 78 4. OTHER ACTIVITIES .....................................................................87 | POPULARISATION ACTIVITIES AND COLLABORATION WITH UNIVERSITIES AND HIGH SCHOOLS ...................................................................... 87 | MEETINGS ORGANISED BY THE INSTITUTE .............................................91 | MEMBERSHIP IN EDITORIAL BOARDS ..................................................95 | EDUCATION AND TEACHING ACTIVITIES ...............................................96 Teaching at universities . 96 PhD students working at the Institute and/or supervised by the Institute’s fellows . 97 PhD theses defended over 2015–2016 and supervised by the Institute’s fellows . 99 | EDITORIAL ACTIVITIES ...............................................................100 | AWARDS ............................................................................101 achievements of a more applied character. It is my wish here to express a vote of heartfelt thanks to all the research teams for their excellent results over the past two years. In addition to our sci- entific output, I am also pleased to announce the successful completion of our new state-of-the-art breeding facility in 2016, which we now plan to open in summer 2017. Probably the most significant event for the IVB over the past two years was the international eval- uation of the Institute for 2010-2014. I am happy to say that the Institute was evaluated very posi- tively, which is reflected in an increase in the Insti- tute budget of cca 10 % for 2017. Of course, these funds are never enough to cover all our expenses, especially when it comes to funding research pro- PREFACE jects. As ever, thanks must go to all our scientists who proved highly competitive and successful in obtaining research grants. These grants contribut- Dear reader, ed significantly to the IVB budget, representing an You have just opened the Biennial report, which is additional 45.8 and 49.7 million CZK in 2015 and traditionally published every other year by the In- 2016, respectively. stitute of Vertebrate Biology (IVB). The purpose Finally, I would like to express once again what of this report is to provide information on the sci- a personal pleasure it has been to work at the IVB. entific results published by the Institute’s staff -be I always feel that the pleasant and constructive at- tween 2015 and 2016 and important events that mosphere that is so typical at our Institute is one occurred over that time, both in a style that is ac- of the primary prerequisites for our ongoing suc- cessible to the interested layperson. cess and will allow us to reach even greater heights I believe that the information contained in this over the coming years. report will be of interest not only to our co-work- ers but also to colleagues from other institutions and to the general public. What is more, it should Dear reader, I wish you pleasant reading. also stimulate our potential new students and post-doctoral researchers in deciding where to di- rect their professional career. Finally, I believe that the information provided in this and previous re- ports on the development of the Institute and the milestones that have influenced the direction of the Institute over time could prove an inspiring and useful resource to writers and contributors. At the IVB, we focus on groundbreaking re- search in fields such as evolutionary biology, bio- diversity and medical zoology. These research ac- tivities are primarily of a fundamental nature and focus on observation and experiment in order to Marcel Honza gain a better understanding of the processes that Director of the Institute of Vertebrate Biology affect the fascinating world of the animal king- dom. Such studies have produce around 110 sci- April, 2017 entific publications per year in peer-reviewed journals. Also of note is the growing number of 5 6 BASIC FACTS 1. BASIC FACTS | STRUCTURE OF THE INSTITUTE OF VERTEBRATE BIOLOGY OF THE CAS Supervisory Board Director Board of the Institute Deputy Directors Scientific Secretary Research Sector * Services (Brno) Research Team 1 Administrative Department (headed by group leader 1) Research Team 2 Scientific Information (headed by group leader 2) Centre and Library Research Team 3 Secretariat (headed by group leader 3) Research Team … X (headed by group leader … X) * dispersed at three research facilities – Brno, Studenec, Valtice The Institute of Vertebrate Biology (IVB) is a relatively small institute (ca 22-25 permanent researchers) of the Czech Academy of Sciences and, as such, is not structured to separate research departments. Senior researchers are usually the principal investigators of national and international projects and are responsible for creating and maintaining their teams, predominantly from external funds. Principal in- vestigators (group leaders) of projects are directly subordinated to the Director. Research teams are very flexible and are composed of junior researchers, post-doctorates, research assistants, technicians and pre- and post-graduate students (most paid from project grants). Research subjects can be divided into three main domains: evolutionary ecology, biodiversity, and pathogens and diseases (see below). Indi- vidual projects, however, can cover more topics and researchers often use interdisciplinary approaches. 7 INSTITUTE OF VERTEBRATE BIOLOGY | THE CZECH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES BIENNIAL REPORT 2015–2016 | STAFF AND BUDGET While the IVB is relatively small based on number of employees and budget, it is important as regards scientific output and other activities. Eighty-two people were employed in 2015, a number that rose to 89 in 2016 (full- time equivalents). Staff structure was similar in both years. While a significantly decreasing trend in the number of institutional employees was stopped, the number of people (mainly post-doctorate students, PhD students and technicians) employed on the basis of (unpredictable) external project funding rose to 54 %. 31 % 69 % 54 % 46 % Supporting Staff Researchers Projects Institutional Staff structure of the IVB between 2015 and 2016 (mean values for both years recalculated to full-time jobs) . Number of employees Number of employees (recalculated
Recommended publications
  • Great Lakes/Big Rivers Fisheries Operational Plan Accomplishment

    Great Lakes/Big Rivers Fisheries Operational Plan Accomplishment

    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Fisheries Operational Plan Accomplishment Report for Fiscal Year 2004 March 2003 Region 3 - Great Lakes/Big Rivers Partnerships and Accountability Aquatic Habitat Conservation and Management Workforce Management Aquatic Species Conservation and Aquatic Invasive Species Management Cooperation with Native Public Use Leadership in Science Americans and Technology To view monthly issues of “Fish Lines”, see our Regional website at: (http://www.fws.gov/midwest/Fisheries/) 2 Fisheries Accomplishment Report - FY2004 Great Lakes - Big Rivers Region Message from the Assistant Regional Director for Fisheries The Fisheries Program in Region 3 (Great Lakes – Big Rivers) is committed to the conservation of our diverse aquatic resources and the maintenance of healthy, sustainable populations of fish that can be enjoyed by millions of recreational anglers. To that end, we are working with the States, Tribes, other Federal agencies and our many partners in the private sector to identify, prioritize and focus our efforts in a manner that is most complementary to their efforts, consistent with the mission of our agency, and within the funding resources available. At the very heart of our efforts is the desire to be transparent and accountable and, to that end, we present this Region 3 Annual Fisheries Accomplishment Report for Fiscal Year 2004. This report captures our commitments from the Region 3 Fisheries Program Operational Plan, Fiscal Years 2004 & 2005. This document cannot possibly capture the myriad of activities that are carried out by any one station in any one year, by all of the dedicated employees in the Fisheries Program, but, hopefully, it provides a clear indication of where our energy is focused.
  • Checklistccamp2016.Pdf

    Checklistccamp2016.Pdf

    2 3 Participant’s Name: Tour Company: Date#1: / / Tour locations Date #2: / / Tour locations Date #3: / / Tour locations Date #4: / / Tour locations Date #5: / / Tour locations Date #6: / / Tour locations Date #7: / / Tour locations Date #8: / / Tour locations Codes used in Column A Codes Sample Species a = Abundant Red-lored Parrot c = Common White-headed Wren u = Uncommon Gray-cheeked Nunlet r = Rare Sapayoa vr = Very rare Wing-banded Antbird m = Migrant Bay-breasted Warbler x = Accidental Dwarf Cuckoo (E) = Endemic Stripe-cheeked Woodpecker Species marked with an asterisk (*) can be found in the birding areas visited on the tour outside of the immediate Canopy Camp property such as Nusagandi, San Francisco Reserve, El Real and Darien National Park/Cerro Pirre. Of course, 4with incredible biodiversity and changing environments, there is always the possibility to see species not listed here. If you have a sighting not on this list, please let us know! No. Bird Species 1A 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Tinamous Great Tinamou u 1 Tinamus major Little Tinamou c 2 Crypturellus soui Ducks Black-bellied Whistling-Duck 3 Dendrocygna autumnalis u Muscovy Duck 4 Cairina moschata r Blue-winged Teal 5 Anas discors m Curassows, Guans & Chachalacas Gray-headed Chachalaca 6 Ortalis cinereiceps c Crested Guan 7 Penelope purpurascens u Great Curassow 8 Crax rubra r New World Quails Tawny-faced Quail 9 Rhynchortyx cinctus r* Marbled Wood-Quail 10 Odontophorus gujanensis r* Black-eared Wood-Quail 11 Odontophorus melanotis u Grebes Least Grebe 12 Tachybaptus dominicus u www.canopytower.com 3 BirdChecklist No.
  • Fish, Various Invertebrates

    Fish, Various Invertebrates

    Zambezi Basin Wetlands Volume II : Chapters 7 - 11 - Contents i Back to links page CONTENTS VOLUME II Technical Reviews Page CHAPTER 7 : FRESHWATER FISHES .............................. 393 7.1 Introduction .................................................................... 393 7.2 The origin and zoogeography of Zambezian fishes ....... 393 7.3 Ichthyological regions of the Zambezi .......................... 404 7.4 Threats to biodiversity ................................................... 416 7.5 Wetlands of special interest .......................................... 432 7.6 Conservation and future directions ............................... 440 7.7 References ..................................................................... 443 TABLE 7.2: The fishes of the Zambezi River system .............. 449 APPENDIX 7.1 : Zambezi Delta Survey .................................. 461 CHAPTER 8 : FRESHWATER MOLLUSCS ................... 487 8.1 Introduction ................................................................. 487 8.2 Literature review ......................................................... 488 8.3 The Zambezi River basin ............................................ 489 8.4 The Molluscan fauna .................................................. 491 8.5 Biogeography ............................................................... 508 8.6 Biomphalaria, Bulinis and Schistosomiasis ................ 515 8.7 Conservation ................................................................ 516 8.8 Further investigations .................................................
  • Mitochondrial ND2 Phylogeny of Tilapiines and the Evolution of Parental Care Systems in the African Cichlid Fishes

    Mitochondrial ND2 Phylogeny of Tilapiines and the Evolution of Parental Care Systems in the African Cichlid Fishes

    What, if Anything, is a Tilapia?ÐMitochondrial ND2 Phylogeny of Tilapiines and the Evolution of Parental Care Systems in the African Cichlid Fishes Vera Klett and Axel Meyer Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Germany We estimated a novel phylogeny of tilapiine cichlid ®sh (an assemblage endemic to Africa and the Near East) within the African cichlid ®shes on the basis of complete mitochondrial NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2 (ND2) gene sequences. The ND2 (1,047 bp) gene was sequenced in 39 tilapiine cichlids (38 species and 1 subspecies) and in an additional 14 nontilapiine cichlid species in order to evaluate the traditional morphologically based hypothesis of the respective monophyly of the tilapiine and haplochromine cichlid ®sh assemblages. The analyses included many additional cichlid lineages, not only the so-called tilapiines, but also lineages from Lake Tanganyika, east Africa, the Neotropics and an out-group from Madagascar with a wide range of parental care and mating systems. Our results suggest, in contrast to the historical morphology-based hypotheses from Regan (1920, 1922), Trewavas (1983), and Stiassny (1991), that the tilapiines do not form a monophyletic group because there is strong evidence that the genus Tilapia is not monophyletic but divided into at least ®ve distinct groups. In contrast to this ®nding, an allozyme analysis of Pouyaud and AgneÁse (1995), largely based on the same samples as used here, found a clustering of the Tilapia species into only two groups. This discrepancy is likely caused by the difference in resolution power of the two marker systems used. Our data suggest that only type species Tilapia sparrmanii Smith (1840) should retain the genus name Tilapia.
  • Indian and Madagascan Cichlids

    Indian and Madagascan Cichlids

    FAMILY Cichlidae Bonaparte, 1835 - cichlids SUBFAMILY Etroplinae Kullander, 1998 - Indian and Madagascan cichlids [=Etroplinae H] GENUS Etroplus Cuvier, in Cuvier & Valenciennes, 1830 - cichlids [=Chaetolabrus, Microgaster] Species Etroplus canarensis Day, 1877 - Canara pearlspot Species Etroplus suratensis (Bloch, 1790) - green chromide [=caris, meleagris] GENUS Paretroplus Bleeker, 1868 - cichlids [=Lamena] Species Paretroplus dambabe Sparks, 2002 - dambabe cichlid Species Paretroplus damii Bleeker, 1868 - damba Species Paretroplus gymnopreopercularis Sparks, 2008 - Sparks' cichlid Species Paretroplus kieneri Arnoult, 1960 - kotsovato Species Paretroplus lamenabe Sparks, 2008 - big red cichlid Species Paretroplus loisellei Sparks & Schelly, 2011 - Loiselle's cichlid Species Paretroplus maculatus Kiener & Mauge, 1966 - damba mipentina Species Paretroplus maromandia Sparks & Reinthal, 1999 - maromandia cichlid Species Paretroplus menarambo Allgayer, 1996 - pinstripe damba Species Paretroplus nourissati (Allgayer, 1998) - lamena Species Paretroplus petiti Pellegrin, 1929 - kotso Species Paretroplus polyactis Bleeker, 1878 - Bleeker's paretroplus Species Paretroplus tsimoly Stiassny et al., 2001 - tsimoly cichlid GENUS Pseudetroplus Bleeker, in G, 1862 - cichlids Species Pseudetroplus maculatus (Bloch, 1795) - orange chromide [=coruchi] SUBFAMILY Ptychochrominae Sparks, 2004 - Malagasy cichlids [=Ptychochrominae S2002] GENUS Katria Stiassny & Sparks, 2006 - cichlids Species Katria katria (Reinthal & Stiassny, 1997) - Katria cichlid GENUS
  • Outgroup Effects on Root Position and Tree Topology in the AFLP Phylogeny of a Rapidly Radiating Lineage of Cichlid Fish

    Outgroup Effects on Root Position and Tree Topology in the AFLP Phylogeny of a Rapidly Radiating Lineage of Cichlid Fish

    Accepted Manuscript Short Communication Outgroup effects on root position and tree topology in the AFLP phylogeny of a rapidly radiating lineage of cichlid fish Paul C. Kirchberger, Kristina M. Sefc, Christian Sturmbauer, Stephan Koblmüller PII: S1055-7903(13)00347-3 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2013.09.005 Reference: YMPEV 4706 To appear in: Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution Received Date: 5 December 2012 Revised Date: 4 September 2013 Accepted Date: 6 September 2013 Please cite this article as: Kirchberger, P.C., Sefc, K.M., Sturmbauer, C., Koblmüller, S., Outgroup effects on root position and tree topology in the AFLP phylogeny of a rapidly radiating lineage of cichlid fish, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution (2013), doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2013.09.005 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. 1 Outgroup effects on root position and tree topology in the AFLP phylogeny of a rapidly 2 radiating lineage of cichlid fish 3 4 Paul C. Kirchbergera,b, Kristina M. Sefca, Christian Sturmbauera, Stephan Koblmüllera.* 5 6 a Department of Zoology, Karl‐Franzens‐University Graz, Universitätsplatz 2, A‐8010 Graz, 7 Austria 8 b present address: Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, 9 Canada T6G 2E9 10 11 * Corresponding author: Tel.:+43 316 380 3978; Fax: +43 316 380 9875; email: 12 stephan.koblmueller@uni‐graz.at (S.
  • Presentation

    Presentation

    Evolution in Darwin’s Dreampond: The genomic substrate for adaptive radiation in Lake Tanganyika cichlid fish Walter Salzburger Zoological Institute drawings: Julie Johnson drawings: !Charles R. Darwin’s (1809-1882) journey onboard of the HMS Beagle lasted from 27 December 1831 until 2 October 1836 Adaptive Radiation !Darwin’s specimens were classified as “an entirely new group” of 12 species by ornithologist John Gould (1804-1881) African Great Lakes taxonomic diversity at the species level L. Turkana 1 5 50 500 species 0 50 100 % endemics 4°N L. Tanganyika L. Tanganyika L. Albert 2°N L. Malawi L. Malawi L. Edward L. Victoria L. Victoria 0° L. Edward L. Edward L. Kivu L. Victoria 2°S L. Turkana L. Turkana L. Albert L. Albert 4°S L. Kivu L. Kivu L. Tanganyika 6°S taxonomic diversity at the genus level 10 20 30 40 50 genera 0 50 100 % endemics 8°S Rungwe L. Tanganyika L. Tanganyika Volcanic Field L. Malawi 10°S L. Malawi L. Victoria L. Victoria 12°S L. Malawi L. Edward L. Edward L. Turkana L. Turkana 14°S cichlid fish non-cichlid fish L. Albert L. Albert gastropods bivalves 28°E 30°E 32°E 34°E 36°E L. Kivu L. Kivu ostracods ••• W Salzburger, B Van Bockxlaer, AS Cohen (2017), AREES | AS Cohen & W Salzburger (2017) Scientific Drilling Cichlid Fishes Fotos: Angel M. Fitor Angel M. Fotos: !About every 20th fish species on our planet is the product of the ongoing explosive radiations of cichlids in the East African Great Lakes taxonomic~Diversity Victoria [~500 sp.] Tanganyika [250 sp.] Malawi [~1000 sp.] ••• ME Santos & W Salzburger (2012) Science ecological morphological~Diversity zooplanktivore insectivore piscivore algae scraper leaf eater fin biter eye biter mud digger scale eater ••• H Hofer & W Salzburger (2008) Biologie III ecological morphological~Diversity ••• W Salzburger (2009) Molecular Ecology astbur Astbur.:1-90001 Alignment 1 neobri 100% Neobri.
  • Towards a Regional Information Base for Lake Tanganyika Research

    Towards a Regional Information Base for Lake Tanganyika Research

    RESEARCH FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF THE FISHERIES ON LAKE GCP/RAF/271/FIN-TD/Ol(En) TANGANYIKA GCP/RAF/271/FIN-TD/01 (En) January 1992 TOWARDS A REGIONAL INFORMATION BASE FOR LAKE TANGANYIKA RESEARCH by J. Eric Reynolds FINNISH INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Bujumbura, January 1992 The conclusions and recommendations given in this and other reports in the Research for the Management of the Fisheries on Lake Tanganyika Project series are those considered appropriate at the time of preparation. They may be modified in the light of further knowledge gained at subsequent stages of the Project. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion on the part of FAO or FINNIDA concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or concerning the determination of its frontiers or boundaries. PREFACE The Research for the Management of the Fisheries on Lake Tanganyika project (Tanganyika Research) became fully operational in January 1992. It is executed by the Food and Agriculture organization of the United Nations (FAO) and funded by the Finnish International Development Agency (FINNIDA). This project aims at the determination of the biological basis for fish production on Lake Tanganyika, in order to permit the formulation of a coherent lake-wide fisheries management policy for the four riparian States (Burundi, Tanzania, Zaïre and Zambia). Particular attention will be also given to the reinforcement of the skills and physical facilities of the fisheries research units in all four beneficiary countries as well as to the buildup of effective coordination mechanisms to ensure full collaboration between the Governments concerned.
  • A Small Cichlid Species Flock from the Upper Miocene (9–10 MYA)

    A Small Cichlid Species Flock from the Upper Miocene (9–10 MYA)

    Hydrobiologia https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-020-04358-z (0123456789().,-volV)(0123456789().,-volV) ADVANCES IN CICHLID RESEARCH IV A small cichlid species flock from the Upper Miocene (9–10 MYA) of Central Kenya Melanie Altner . Bettina Reichenbacher Received: 22 March 2020 / Revised: 16 June 2020 / Accepted: 13 July 2020 Ó The Author(s) 2020 Abstract Fossil cichlids from East Africa offer indicate that they represent an ancient small species unique insights into the evolutionary history and flock. Possible modern analogues of palaeolake Waril ancient diversity of the family on the African conti- and its species flock are discussed. The three species nent. Here we present three fossil species of the extinct of Baringochromis may have begun to subdivide haplotilapiine cichlid Baringochromis gen. nov. from their initial habitat by trophic differentiation. Possible the upper Miocene of the palaeolake Waril in Central sources of food could have been plant remains and Kenya, based on the analysis of a total of 78 articulated insects, as their fossilized remains are known from the skeletons. Baringochromis senutae sp. nov., B. same place where Baringochromis was found. sonyii sp. nov. and B. tallamae sp. nov. are super- ficially similar, but differ from each other in oral-tooth Keywords Cichlid fossils Á Pseudocrenilabrinae Á dentition and morphometric characters related to the Palaeolake Á Small species flock Á Late Miocene head, dorsal fin base and body depth. These findings Guest editors: S. Koblmu¨ller, R. C. Albertson, M. J. Genner, Introduction K. M. Sefc & T. Takahashi / Advances in Cichlid Research IV: Behavior, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. The tropical freshwater fish family Cichlidae and its Electronic supplementary material The online version of estimated 2285 species is famous for its high degree of this article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-020-04358-z) con- phenotypic diversity, trophic adaptations and special- tains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
  • Patterns of Evolution in Gobies (Teleostei: Gobiidae): a Multi-Scale Phylogenetic Investigation

    Patterns of Evolution in Gobies (Teleostei: Gobiidae): a Multi-Scale Phylogenetic Investigation

    PATTERNS OF EVOLUTION IN GOBIES (TELEOSTEI: GOBIIDAE): A MULTI-SCALE PHYLOGENETIC INVESTIGATION A Dissertation by LUKE MICHAEL TORNABENE BS, Hofstra University, 2007 MS, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, 2010 Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in MARINE BIOLOGY Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Corpus Christi, Texas December 2014 © Luke Michael Tornabene All Rights Reserved December 2014 PATTERNS OF EVOLUTION IN GOBIES (TELEOSTEI: GOBIIDAE): A MULTI-SCALE PHYLOGENETIC INVESTIGATION A Dissertation by LUKE MICHAEL TORNABENE This dissertation meets the standards for scope and quality of Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi and is hereby approved. Frank L. Pezold, PhD Chris Bird, PhD Chair Committee Member Kevin W. Conway, PhD James D. Hogan, PhD Committee Member Committee Member Lea-Der Chen, PhD Graduate Faculty Representative December 2014 ABSTRACT The family of fishes commonly known as gobies (Teleostei: Gobiidae) is one of the most diverse lineages of vertebrates in the world. With more than 1700 species of gobies spread among more than 200 genera, gobies are the most species-rich family of marine fishes. Gobies can be found in nearly every aquatic habitat on earth, and are often the most diverse and numerically abundant fishes in tropical and subtropical habitats, especially coral reefs. Their remarkable taxonomic, morphological and ecological diversity make them an ideal model group for studying the processes driving taxonomic and phenotypic diversification in aquatic vertebrates. Unfortunately the phylogenetic relationships of many groups of gobies are poorly resolved, obscuring our understanding of the evolution of their ecological diversity. This dissertation is a multi-scale phylogenetic study that aims to clarify phylogenetic relationships across the Gobiidae and demonstrate the utility of this family for studies of macroevolution and speciation at multiple evolutionary timescales.
  • Aquatic Nuisance Species Management Plan

    Aquatic Nuisance Species Management Plan

    NORTH CAROLINA ria ut N e Mystery er Prim es S Wat ros in na e Ch il Aquatic ish F on Nuisance Li rn Sna Species Nor the kehead Marbled Cray fish Hydrill a h Spo fis tted Jelly MANAGEMENT PLAN NORTH CAROLINA AQUATIC NUISANCE SPECIES MANAGEMENT PLAN Prepared by the NC Aquatic Nuisance Species Management Plan Committee October 1, 2015 Approved by: Steve Troxler, Commissioner North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Donald R. van der Vaart, Secretary North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Gordon Myers, Executive Director North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements Executive Summary I. Introduction .....................................................................................................................................................................................................................1 The difference between Aquatic Invasive Species (AIS) and Aquatic Nuisance Species (ANS) ................................................................5 Plan Purpose, Scope and Development ............................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Aquatic Invasive Species Vectors and Impacts ............................................................................................................................................................... 6 Interactions with Other Plan ................................................................................................................................................................................................
  • Chewing and Sucking Lice As Parasites of Iviammals and Birds

    Chewing and Sucking Lice As Parasites of Iviammals and Birds

    c.^,y ^r-^ 1 Ag84te DA Chewing and Sucking United States Lice as Parasites of Department of Agriculture IVIammals and Birds Agricultural Research Service Technical Bulletin Number 1849 July 1997 0 jc: United States Department of Agriculture Chewing and Sucking Agricultural Research Service Lice as Parasites of Technical Bulletin Number IVIammals and Birds 1849 July 1997 Manning A. Price and O.H. Graham U3DA, National Agrioultur«! Libmry NAL BIdg 10301 Baltimore Blvd Beltsvjlle, MD 20705-2351 Price (deceased) was professor of entomoiogy, Department of Ento- moiogy, Texas A&iVI University, College Station. Graham (retired) was research leader, USDA-ARS Screwworm Research Laboratory, Tuxtia Gutiérrez, Chiapas, Mexico. ABSTRACT Price, Manning A., and O.H. Graham. 1996. Chewing This publication reports research involving pesticides. It and Sucking Lice as Parasites of Mammals and Birds. does not recommend their use or imply that the uses U.S. Department of Agriculture, Technical Bulletin No. discussed here have been registered. All uses of pesti- 1849, 309 pp. cides must be registered by appropriate state or Federal agencies or both before they can be recommended. In all stages of their development, about 2,500 species of chewing lice are parasites of mammals or birds. While supplies last, single copies of this publication More than 500 species of blood-sucking lice attack may be obtained at no cost from Dr. O.H. Graham, only mammals. This publication emphasizes the most USDA-ARS, P.O. Box 969, Mission, TX 78572. Copies frequently seen genera and species of these lice, of this publication may be purchased from the National including geographic distribution, life history, habitats, Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, ecology, host-parasite relationships, and economic Springfield, VA 22161.