DOCSLIB.ORG

Ricardian Bulletin Is Produced by the Bulletin Editorial Committee, General Editor Elizabeth Nokes, and Printed by St Edmundsbury Press

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ricardian Bulletin Is Produced by the Bulletin Editorial Committee, General Editor Elizabeth Nokes, and Printed by St Edmundsbury Press Ricardian Bulletin Winter 2005 Contents 2 From the Chairman 4 The Robert Hamblin Award 2005 5 Celebrating 50 Years: The Programme 9 Society News and Notices 15 The Executive Committee: Who we are and what we are doing 16 A Gateway to the Fifteenth Century: Improvements to the Society’s website 18 Media Retrospective 19 News and Reviews 22 News from Barley Hall 24 Richard III & Yorkist History Trust Annual Report 26 The Man Himself 27 The Debate: Historical Novels: A good thing or not? 30 Logge Notes and Queries: Education, Education, Education by L Wynne-Davies 32 Battling for Bosworth by A D White 35 Irving, Cibber and Richard III by Angela Moreton 38 Richard III’s Christmas by John Ashdown-Hill 40 Correspondence 42 The Barton Library 45 Letter from America 47 Report on Society Events 51 Future Society Events 53 Branches and Groups Contacts 55 Branches and Groups Reports 61 New Members 62 Obituaries 64 Calendar Contributions Contributions are welcomed from all members. Articles and correspondence regarding the Bulletin Debate should be sent to Peter Hammond and all other contributions to Elizabeth Nokes. Bulletin Press Dates 15 January for Spring issue; 15 April for Summer issue; 15 July for Autumn issue; 15 October for Winter issue. Articles should be sent well in advance. Bulletin & Ricardian Back Numbers Back issues of The Ricardian and Bulletin are available from Judith Ridley. If you are interested in obtaining any back numbers, please contact Mrs Ridley to establish whether she holds the issue(s) in which you are interested. For contact details see back inside cover of the Bulletin The Ricardian Bulletin is produced by the Bulletin Editorial Committee, General Editor Elizabeth Nokes, and printed by St Edmundsbury Press. © Richard III Society, 2005 1 From the Chairman he Christmas season is almost upon us and in this issue we get an idea of what the season T would have been like at the court of King Richard III. There is also a new debate, focussing on the role of the historical novel. This is an interesting coincidence, for at the AGM this year the point was made that the Society owes a big debt to Josephine Tey. Over the years, her 1952 novel The Daughter of Time has led many to join the Society. As my opening remarks to this year’s AGM addressed many of the challenges that have re- cently faced us as well as looked forward to our anniversary next year, it has been suggested that these ought to be printed in the Bulletin so that they can be shared with all members. Consequent- ly, my remarks for this Chairman’s page are shorter than usual. I must however mention experiences by two members of the Society. First, the terrible for- tunes of Carole Rike, who lost both her home and her business as a result of Hurricane Katrina. Carole is the editor of the Ricardian Register and distributes the Bulletin and Ricardian to mem- bers of the American Branch. All Ricardians, I am sure, will join me in sending her our commis- erations and best wishes for the speedy restoration of her fortunes. We have in the meantime been doing all we can to help Carole and the branch. I am sure that really, luck did not come into it, but the other person I must mention is Lesley Wynne-Davies. A member of the Executive Committee and prominent in the Wills Project, Lesley has recently been awarded her PhD and we offer her our heartiest congratulations on this well earned achievement. Finally, let me wish you all a very merry Christmas and a safe and happy New Year. Phil Stone Chairman’s Opening Remarks to the 2005 Annual General Meeting We have had another year of change within the Society, and I think it is true to say that it has been a year of change for the better, and before I go any further, let me assure members that, con- trary to the supercilious comments printed about us in The Times newspaper just after the Bos- worth commemoration, the Richard III Society is not in great financial trouble and it is still very much committed to its aims regarding the much maligned king. True, as members will be aware, our financial position for some years has been out of bal- ance, with income not keeping up with expenditure. As Mr Micawber would have said, the result was ‘misery’. Consequently, we have had to take some tough decisions. Tough and necessary decisions. This year has seen us continuing with our review of the way we operate, looking at areas that can be made more efficient to reduce costs, while at the same time, of course, ensuring that we maintain and even improve our services to members To this end, we have reorganised the membership and sales functions, bringing them back in- house. This has saved money and, through better use of information technology, has improved the effectiveness of both. One indication that such reorganisation is working is evident when I tell you that this last year has seen the lowest number of membership lapses (i.e. members who have neither paid nor officially resigned) for well over ten years. One of the hardest bullets we have had to bite, though, has been the taking of a realistic deci- sion about subscription rates. As a relatively small and basically voluntary society, we must 2 charge members the real cost of their membership. Having increased subscription rates across the board and raised the overseas postage supplement, this has now been achieved, and my thanks go to the membership for its understanding, and especially to our much valued overseas members, where increases have hit the hardest. Fortunately, we will not be needing to make any more in- creases as we have found an overseas bulk mailing system - called M Bags - that will enable us to keep the costs down for a while yet. In relation to these increases, members can be assured of two things: firstly, in all cases, we have explored the most cost effective means of serving the membership, particularly in respect of postage costs, hence the use of M Bags, and secondly, our subscription and postage rates com- pare very favourably with those of similar societies. I firmly believe that what we have achieved represents good value for money for members. These changes for the better have meant a lot of work and so I take this opportunity to thank all those involved in developing and implementing them. Overall, we have had another successful Ricardian year. We are continuing to expand and enhance our research capacity and, through the new research community initiative, we can expect much more. The triennial conference in Cambridge this year showcased all that is best in the So- ciety. It was greatly enjoyed by all who attended, and my thanks go to the Research Officer, Wendy Moorhen, for managing our research programme and for organising the conference. Now we look forward next year to the publishing of the results of the Wills project. The continuing excellence of The Ricardian, and increasingly the Bulletin, projects our posi- tive image to the membership and the outside world. My thanks, then, to Anne Sutton for The Ricardian and to Elizabeth Nokes and the editorial team for the Bulletin. We are beginning to forge a new relationship with our branches and groups. Regional meet- ings are being planned, with the first having taken place in Bridport a few weeks ago. The dia- logue has begun and we are listening. My thanks go to John Ashdown-Hill, in the newly created post of Branches and Groups Officer, for developing and taking forward this important initiative. As you will all know by now, John is doing some very interesting work involving DNA, and we wait with much anticipation to see where this may lead. John has also had what we think is a splendid idea for encouraging younger members of the public to develop a greater interest in Richard III, and it was enthusiastically taken up by the Ex- ecutive Committee, especially when it became obvious that we could get John to do most of the work! As a result, he has been organising a nationwide competition for schools. It is broadly di- vided into two parts, with subsections for different ages. The first is for an essay on the subject of Richard III, whilst the second is a poster competition, the subject being any Ricardian site. The essays will be marked by a group of history teachers, organised by Jane Trump, whilst the judges for the posters will include the artist Graham Turner and our own Geoffrey Wheeler. My thanks go also to the rest of the Executive Committee and to the officers of the Society for all the work they have done over the year. There is not time to mention everything and every- one, but I must mention our retiring treasurer, Bill Featherstone, and thank him for his invaluable contributions during his tenure. We wish him and his family well for the future. Next year, we celebrate the fiftieth anniversary of the 1956 refounding of the Society. We have a special logo (or badge) for the anniversary and a growing programme of events to enjoy, which I hope will involve as many members as possible. A highlight is undoubtedly the weekend of events in York around the AGM. It promises to be a Ricardian weekend to remember. It surely goes without saying that the Society would not have been refounded without the prodigious work of our senior Vice President, Isolde Wigram, and I think it is safe to say that we will be acknowledging her contribution on a number of occasions during 2006.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Leighway Winter 2005.Pdf
    Issue 16 – Winter 2005 The newsletter of the Leigh Society An eye to the future with an ear to the past in the heart of Leigh FROM THE EDITOR MEET THE ANCESTORS At Leigh Regatta at the Heritage Centre Carole will have I hope you have all been looking forward to this edition her 18000+ database of Leigh people and their of Leighway which is full of interesting items and connections going back over 300 years so if you want to information. know about your Leigh ancestors or know someone who 2005 was a truly momentous one for the Society with the does spread the word. award of Lottery funding for Plumbs Cottage so keep your eyes on the Old Town. DIARY DATES Our annual quiz was again a great success thanks to Unless otherwise stated, all events will be held at Wesley Duncan our expert quiz master and the outing to Hall, Elm Road Methodist Church at 8 p.m. There is a Portsmouth was enjoyed by all who took part, thanks, as small entrance fee of 50p for members and £1 for non ever, to Ann Price, for organizing the trip. members for those meetings to help cover the cost of the Our next challenge is to get Plumbs Cottage up and hall which has risen again this year. running. 12 October - Hadleigh Past and Present - Derek Barber I thank all of those who have contributed to the Leighway 21 October - 8pm at Clifftown URC, Nelson Street – this year, your articles have been very interesting so keep Southend Band Concert to celebrate Nelson and support them coming.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Framework Revised.Vp
    Frontispiece: the Norfolk Rapid Coastal Zone Assessment Survey team recording timbers and ballast from the wreck of The Sheraton on Hunstanton beach, with Hunstanton cliffs and lighthouse in the background. Photo: David Robertson, copyright NAU Archaeology Research and Archaeology Revisited: a revised framework for the East of England edited by Maria Medlycott East Anglian Archaeology Occasional Paper No.24, 2011 ALGAO East of England EAST ANGLIAN ARCHAEOLOGY OCCASIONAL PAPER NO.24 Published by Association of Local Government Archaeological Officers East of England http://www.algao.org.uk/cttees/Regions Editor: David Gurney EAA Managing Editor: Jenny Glazebrook Editorial Board: Brian Ayers, Director, The Butrint Foundation Owen Bedwin, Head of Historic Environment, Essex County Council Stewart Bryant, Head of Historic Environment, Hertfordshire County Council Will Fletcher, English Heritage Kasia Gdaniec, Historic Environment, Cambridgeshire County Council David Gurney, Historic Environment Manager, Norfolk County Council Debbie Priddy, English Heritage Adrian Tindall, Archaeological Consultant Keith Wade, Archaeological Service Manager, Suffolk County Council Set in Times Roman by Jenny Glazebrook using Corel Ventura™ Printed by Henry Ling Limited, The Dorset Press © ALGAO East of England ISBN 978 0 9510695 6 1 This Research Framework was published with the aid of funding from English Heritage East Anglian Archaeology was established in 1975 by the Scole Committee for Archaeology in East Anglia. The scope of the series expanded to include all six eastern counties and responsi- bility for publication passed in 2002 to the Association of Local Government Archaeological Officers, East of England (ALGAO East). Cover illustration: The excavation of prehistoric burial monuments at Hanson’s Needingworth Quarry at Over, Cambridgeshire, by Cambridge Archaeological Unit in 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Speakers of the House of Commons
    Parliamentary Information List BRIEFING PAPER 04637a 21 August 2015 Speakers of the House of Commons Speaker Date Constituency Notes Peter de Montfort 1258 − William Trussell 1327 − Appeared as joint spokesman of Lords and Commons. Styled 'Procurator' Henry Beaumont 1332 (Mar) − Appeared as joint spokesman of Lords and Commons. Sir Geoffrey Le Scrope 1332 (Sep) − Appeared as joint spokesman of Lords and Commons. Probably Chief Justice. William Trussell 1340 − William Trussell 1343 − Appeared for the Commons alone. William de Thorpe 1347-1348 − Probably Chief Justice. Baron of the Exchequer, 1352. William de Shareshull 1351-1352 − Probably Chief Justice. Sir Henry Green 1361-1363¹ − Doubtful if he acted as Speaker. All of the above were Presiding Officers rather than Speakers Sir Peter de la Mare 1376 − Sir Thomas Hungerford 1377 (Jan-Mar) Wiltshire The first to be designated Speaker. Sir Peter de la Mare 1377 (Oct-Nov) Herefordshire Sir James Pickering 1378 (Oct-Nov) Westmorland Sir John Guildesborough 1380 Essex Sir Richard Waldegrave 1381-1382 Suffolk Sir James Pickering 1383-1390 Yorkshire During these years the records are defective and this Speaker's service might not have been unbroken. Sir John Bussy 1394-1398 Lincolnshire Beheaded 1399 Sir John Cheyne 1399 (Oct) Gloucestershire Resigned after only two days in office. John Dorewood 1399 (Oct-Nov) Essex Possibly the first lawyer to become Speaker. Sir Arnold Savage 1401(Jan-Mar) Kent Sir Henry Redford 1402 (Oct-Nov) Lincolnshire Sir Arnold Savage 1404 (Jan-Apr) Kent Sir William Sturmy 1404 (Oct-Nov) Devonshire Or Esturmy Sir John Tiptoft 1406 Huntingdonshire Created Baron Tiptoft, 1426.
    [Show full text]
  • Bills of Attainder
    University at Buffalo School of Law Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship Winter 2016 Bills of Attainder Matthew Steilen University at Buffalo School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/journal_articles Part of the Legal History Commons Recommended Citation Matthew Steilen, Bills of Attainder, 53 Hous. L. Rev. 767 (2016). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/journal_articles/123 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLE BILLS OF ATTAINDER Matthew Steilen* ABSTRACT What are bills of attainder? The traditional view is that bills of attainder are legislation that punishes an individual without judicial process. The Bill of Attainder Clause in Article I, Section 9 prohibits the Congress from passing such bills. But what about the President? The traditional view would seem to rule out application of the Clause to the President (acting without Congress) and to executive agencies, since neither passes bills. This Article aims to bring historical evidence to bear on the question of the scope of the Bill of Attainder Clause. The argument of the Article is that bills of attainder are best understood as a summary form of legal process, rather than a legislative act. This argument is based on a detailed historical reconstruction of English and early American practices, beginning with a study of the medieval Parliament rolls, year books, and other late medieval English texts, and early modern parliamentary diaries and journals covering the attainders of Elizabeth Barton under Henry VIII and Thomas Wentworth, earl of Strafford, under Charles I.
    [Show full text]
  • Wing During the Anglo-Saxon Period
    Wing during the Anglo-Saxon period. By Sarah Roe BA (Hons) History Introduction I have the most wonderful privilege of having a young Saxon girl living with me at present, not a ghost as such, but a recreation of a skull found in our local graveyard during a development dig 15 years ago. She has inspired me to take another look at Wing to see exactly how she may have lived, who she may have been and what life was like. Wing was not the ordinary small village that was made out when ‘Meet the Ancestors’ visited in 1999, it was in fact a frontier Anglo-Saxon holding, on the very edge of the Kingdom of Mercia, with a Minster serving several parishes around the area, its influence dwindling in the mid- late Medieval period until Tudor times. We have no exact knowledge of what Wing would have been like as very little written evidence has been found, however we can imagine from the fragmentary evidence we do have the rough size and scope of Wing. This paper will look at the land history of the area. Early Wing The only physical evidence we have of Anglo-Saxons in Wing today is the Church, supposed to be one of the oldest in the country, potentially dating from as early as the 7th century, and probably used as a burial ground from that time (Holmes and Chapman, p.66). This date puts Wing at the forefront of the rise of the Christian Church. Pope Gregory had determined that the English would be converted and took the relevant steps to ensure success.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Southampton Research Repository Eprints Soton
    University of Southampton Research Repository ePrints Soton Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given e.g. AUTHOR (year of submission) "Full thesis title", University of Southampton, name of the University School or Department, PhD Thesis, pagination http://eprints.soton.ac.uk i UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON FACULTY OF HUMANITIES School of History The Wydeviles 1066-1503 A Re-assessment by Lynda J. Pidgeon Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 15 December 2011 ii iii ABSTRACT Who were the Wydeviles? The family arrived with the Conqueror in 1066. As followers in the Conqueror’s army the Wydeviles rose through service with the Mowbray family. If we accept the definition given by Crouch and Turner for a brief period of time the Wydeviles qualified as barons in the twelfth century. This position was not maintained. By the thirteenth century the family had split into two distinct branches. The senior line settled in Yorkshire while the junior branch settled in Northamptonshire. The junior branch of the family gradually rose to prominence in the county through service as escheator, sheriff and knight of the shire.
    [Show full text]
  • Kiils K Qffiel
    KIilS k QffiEl FROM THE REIGN OF WILLIAM THE CONQUEROR R\ ^'Cl TTCtO VICTORIVTflTORTA THTTTtEf t?TDQFIRSTT . §J? <A V WILLIAM THE CONQUfciiOR. 3 PRINT E D ^ •b §M^W:&-'-:. H 1 S T 0 It Y OF THE KINGS & QUEENS OF ENGLAND, WILLIAM THE CONQUEROR Began to Born Reign 1024. Decern. 25, 1066. Died Scptem. 9, Reigned 1087. 21 Years. Surnamed Rufus, from his red hair and florid complexion, was the second surviving son to the Conqueror, and was by his father's will appointed his successor. The Norman barons being dis­ Was natural son of Robert, Duke of Normandy, pleased with this, and looking on his brother Robert and was called the Conqueror because he conquered as the proper owner, a powerful conspiracy was Harold the Dauntless, and overthrew the Saxon therefore formed against William by his uncle Odo. dynasty in thisliountry. He gave out that Edward William, sensible of his danger, was soon in the the Confessor left him the crown of England by field at the head of a powerful army. Robert will, and determining to assert his right to it, lost his opportunity by not assisting his friends, landed in England with an army of 60,000 men, who had taken fortresses on the hopes of his and gave battle at Hastings, where Harold was assurances, and who, when William appeared be­ killed, and his army defeated; after which William fore them, had to implore his mercy. He was became King of England. He was above eight accidentally shot through the heart with an arrow, feet high, strong built, and well proportioned.
    [Show full text]
  • After Agincourt
    After Agincourt After Agincourt William Worcester’s Lost Journal edited by Stephen Cooper 1 After Agincourt Copyright Stephen Cooper, 2013 The right of Stephen Cooper to be identified as Author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 2 After Agincourt For William 3 After Agincourt Contents Editor’s Preface Sir John Fastolf’s accompt of the burning of John Badby, 1410 I September, 1444 II October III November IV December V January, 1445 VI February VII March VIII April IX May X June XI July XII August 4 After Agincourt Editor’s Preface This Journal, which I have entitled After Agincourt, was written by William Worcester over a period of twelve months in 1444-5. It describes a very different country from the one we inhabit today. The Kingdom of England was surrounded by enemies. The Welsh were a subject people, but one which had come within an ace of throwing off English rule only thirty years before. The Scots were inveterate enemies, universally hated in England, especially in the northern counties. The French were a constant threat, much more populous and powerful than the English, and quite determined to reclaim the territories which the King of England still held on to, in Aquitaine and Normandy. Henry V’s startling victory at Agincourt in 1415 seemed like a distant memory three decades later. Superficially, there were many similarities between the England of 1444 and the England of 2014. We had a monarch and a bi-cameral Parliament then, and London dominated the life of the nation financially and politically, while most of the wealth was in the South-East.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Archaeology
    Public Archaeology Arts of Engagement edited by Howard Williams Caroline Pudney Afnan Ezzeldin Access Archaeology aeopr ch es r s A A y c g c e o l s o s e A a r c Ah Archaeopress Publishing Ltd Summertown Pavilion 18-24 Middle Way Summertown Oxford OX2 7LG www.archaeopress.com ISBN 978-1-78969-373-7 ISBN 978-1-78969-374-4 (e-Pdf) © the individual authors Archaeopress 2019 Cover image: The Heritage Graffiti Project during creation (Photograph: Ryan Eddleston, reproduced with permission) All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the copyright owners. This book is available direct from Archaeopress or from our website www.archaeopress.com Contents List of Figures ......................................................................................................................................................... iii List of Tables .......................................................................................................................................................... vii Contributors.......................................................................................................................................................... viii Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................................................x Foreword ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
    [Show full text]
  • Lisa L. Ford Phd Thesis
    CONCILIAR POLITICS AND ADMINISTRATION IN THE REIGN OF HENRY VII Lisa L. Ford A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews 2001 Full metadata for this item is available in Research@StAndrews:FullText at: http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/7121 This item is protected by original copyright Conciliar Politics and Administration in the Reign of Henry VII Lisa L. Ford A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of St. Andrews April 2001 DECLARATIONS (i) I, Lisa Lynn Ford, hereby certify that this thesis, which is approximately 100,000 words in length, has been written by me, that it is the record of work carried out by me and that it has not been submitted in any previous application for a higher degree. Signature of candidate' (ii) I was admitted as a reseach student in January 1996 and as a candidate for the degree of Ph.D. in January 1997; the higher study for which this is a record was carried out in the University of St. Andrews between 1996 and 2001. / 1 Date: ') -:::S;{:}'(j. )fJ1;;/ Signature of candidate: 1/ - / i (iii) I hereby certify that the candidate has fulfilled the conditions of the Resolution and Regulations appropriate for the degree of Ph.D. in the University of St. Andrews and that the candidate is qualified to submit this thesis in application for that degree. Date \ (If (Ls-> 1 Signature of supervisor: (iv) In submitting this thesis to the University of St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Enduring Appeal of Richard III
    The Enduring Appeal of Richard III Harriet Jordan, 2002 Written as part of the M.Litt. program at the University of Sydney, in the subject Medieval Crime Fiction. It has indeed been confidently asserted that [Richard the 3d] killed his two Nephews & his Wife, but it has also been declared that he did not kill his two Nephews.1 Richard III has been a presence in the popular imagination for centuries. There are, however, two radically different Richard IIIs appearing in the works of novelists, historians and playwrights/filmmakers. On the one hand, we have the traditional Evil Richard, who may have first appeared in writing in the histories of Polydore Vergil (1534) and Sir Thomas More (1543 and 1557), but who undoubtedly gained his ongoing fame – or infamy – as a result of William Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of Richard III, and the earlier Henry VI plays. Opposing him is Defamed Richard, who first saw light of day in 1619 with Sir George Buck’s five-part The History of the Life and Reigne of Richard the Third, but whose main impact on the public consciousness came as recently as 1951 with the publication of Josephine Tey’s The Daughter of Time. Unlike virtually any other historical figure, Richard III manages to be both “an enduring symbol of evil and conversely a white knight whose honour has been besmirched by his enemies.”2 Thus, his ongoing appeal arises from a number of very different sources. When Shakespeare wrote his Richard III, England was still under the rule of the Tudors, and so it would hardly have been politic to present Richard in a sympathetic light.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Henry 4 Closes in April 1413
    Reigned 1399–1413. The play opens in July 1403; 2 henry 4 closes in April 1413. Written about 1596. Dramatis Personae: Rumor, the presenter Lady Northumberland Lady Percy Mistress Quickly Doll Tearsheet King Henry the Fourth Henry, Prince of Wales; afterwards King Henry the Fifth Thomas of Clarence Prince John of Lancaster Humphrey of Gloucester Earl of Warwick Earl of Westmoreland Earl of Surrey Gower Harcourt Blunt Lord Chief Justice A Servant to the Chief Justice Earl of Northumberland Scroop, Archbishop of York Lord Mowbray Lord Hastings Lord Bardolph Sir John Coleville Travers and Morton Falstaff, Bardolph, Pistol, and a Page Poins and Peto Shallow and Silence, country justices Davy, Shallow’s servant Mouldy, Shadow, Wart, Feeble, and Bullcalf, recruits Fang and Snare, sheriff’s officers Lords and Attendants Officers, Messengers, Soldiers Porter, Drawer, Beadles, Grooms, etc. A Dancer, Speaker of the Epilogue Robin Williams • www.iReadShakespeare.org • www.InternationalShakespeare.center Reigned 1399–1413. The play opens in July 1403; 2 henry 4 closes in April 1413. Written about 1596. Name and title Birth date Death date Age in play Age at death King Henry IV 1367 1413 36/46 46 Son of John of Gaunt; cousin to Richard II. Usurped Richard II and became Henry IV. Henry, Prince of Wales, called Prince Hal sep 1387 1442 of 16/26 35 Also called Henry of Monmouth. Oldest son to King dystentery in Henry IV. Mother is Mary de Bohun. France Thomas, Duke of Clarence 1388 1422 15/25 34 2nd son of Henry IV; brother to Henry V, Gloucester, and Bedford; uncle to Henry VI.
    [Show full text]