After Agincourt

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

After Agincourt After Agincourt After Agincourt William Worcester’s Lost Journal edited by Stephen Cooper 1 After Agincourt Copyright Stephen Cooper, 2013 The right of Stephen Cooper to be identified as Author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 2 After Agincourt For William 3 After Agincourt Contents Editor’s Preface Sir John Fastolf’s accompt of the burning of John Badby, 1410 I September, 1444 II October III November IV December V January, 1445 VI February VII March VIII April IX May X June XI July XII August 4 After Agincourt Editor’s Preface This Journal, which I have entitled After Agincourt, was written by William Worcester over a period of twelve months in 1444-5. It describes a very different country from the one we inhabit today. The Kingdom of England was surrounded by enemies. The Welsh were a subject people, but one which had come within an ace of throwing off English rule only thirty years before. The Scots were inveterate enemies, universally hated in England, especially in the northern counties. The French were a constant threat, much more populous and powerful than the English, and quite determined to reclaim the territories which the King of England still held on to, in Aquitaine and Normandy. Henry V’s startling victory at Agincourt in 1415 seemed like a distant memory three decades later. Superficially, there were many similarities between the England of 1444 and the England of 2014. We had a monarch and a bi-cameral Parliament then, and London dominated the life of the nation financially and politically, while most of the wealth was in the South-East. Yet appearances can be deceptive. The King ruled as well as reigned. Parliament existed to assist the Crown, not to limit its power. Democracy, in so far as men thought about it at all, was an unspeakable Greek practice, the equivalent of mob rule. The population of the country had been drastically reduced by the Black Death of 1348 and subsequent outbreaks of plague, and was tiny, compared to what it is today. Most people lived in the countryside and they earned their living by farming. It was no part of the function of government to promote economic growth. Most men had no aspiration to ‘rise’ in society. The expectation was that you stayed in the station to which you had been born and life for most people was nasty, brutish and above all short. Around a third of the population was in holy orders. There were hundreds of monasteries and other religious houses, not visibly in decline. The major buildings of the day were built to honour God, not Mammon. The fate of the individual soul was paramount. Sexual intercourse was considered an unclean act, the product of the Original Sin committed by Adam and Eve, which had condemned all mankind to a miserable life, subject only to the promise of redemption through Christ and the Holy Roman Catholic Church. Yet, although that Church was ubiquitous, the Lollard heresy, the first in England for a thousand years, had gained manie adherents. Likewise, the monarchy, though divinely ordained, was far from being 5 After Agincourt totalitarian in the modern sense. It lacked the power to impose its will, since there was no police force, no standing army outside Normandy, and no Royal Navy. Law and order was largely left to local authorities and England was a much more violent place then, than it is now. William Worcester (1415 - c.1482) was born in Agincourt year. He came from Bristol, was educated at Oxford and became scrivener, or secretary, to Sir John Fastolf (c.1380 - 1459). He joined Fastolf’s service some time before 1439, when the Knight retired to England, after manie years’ service to the Crown. They lived at Fastolf Place, or Palace, in Southwark, gradually moving to the sumptuous castle Sir John was built at his birthplace of Caister in Norfolk. Fastolf was one of the richest men in England, but he was never a member of the aristocracy, though he was made Baron of Sillé-le-Guillaume, in France. He was lord of a large number of manors, spread throughout manie counties. Some of these, notably Castle Combe in Dorset and Bentley in Yorkshire, had come to him when he married a wealthy and older widow, Millicent Scrope, in 1409. The marriage was childless but Fastolf held on to her manors after Millicent died in 1445. Millicent had a son by her previous marriage, Stephen Scrope, who became Fastolf’s ward. Stephen ought by rights to have inherited his parents’ estates in 1445, but Fastolf kept Scrope waiting until his own death in 1459. Stephen Srope never forgave Fastolf for the way he had been treated. Fastolf lived was a soldier, landowner and litigant and he lived in the public eye. His alleged ‘desertion’ of Sir John Talbot at Patay in 1431, when he ‘fled the field’ and left an entire English army to its fate, made him notorious. It is less well known that he was a writer, the author of the first military tract written in English, and a prime mover in a small literary circle which included Worcester, Scrope and Peter Basset, who wrote a chronicle of the French wars at his master’s request. Worcester is altogether more obscure than his master; but as Fastolf’s secretary, he had occasion to travel the length and breadth of the South of England. As he did, he compiled a guidebook, somewhat akin to Cobbett’s Rural Rides, which we know as The Itineraries and which was completed some time in the 1470s. The Itineraries is an invaluable source for historians of all kinds today, though it is a long and rambling work, full of lists, and tells us nothing of Worcester’s privat life. Worcester’s other works included the Annales Rerum Anglicarum, (‘Annals of the History of England’), the Acta Domini Johannis Fastolf (‘The Deeds of Master John Fastolf’) and The Boke of Noblesse, begun in the 1450s and finished in 1475. He is also known to have collaborated with Scrope on The Dicts and Sayings of the Philosophers, a very boring compendium of sayings, reflections and moral tales; and there is also his Topography of Medieval Bristol. Literary historians have long suspected that he wrote 6 After Agincourt another work, but believed that it was lost long ago, and possibly never completed. I think I can now claim to have discovered this.1 The text I now present to the public was discovered by me some years ago in the McFarlane library in Magdalen College, Oxford. It is not like any of Worcester’s other books. For a start, it is a ‘juvenile’ work, in the sense that it was written much earlier than any of his other known works, before he was married, or indeed had any experience of women, though he was 30 at the time. More importantly, it is highly unusual. It is not a chronicle or history or travelogue or work of theology, and it was written in English, when it was still common to write in Latin or French. It was evidently begun when Sir John Fastolf asked Worcester to prepare a tract, similar to several which he is known to have written himself, to explain why the English had triumphed at Agincourt, and why triumph had been followed by disaster. In Fastolf’s view the answer was very simple: the country had gone to the dogs; but Fastolf was old and Worcester was young, and the younger man was reluctant to agree with his master’s pessimistic view. Worcester struggled with this commission. In fact, he found it impossible to write the book Fastolf required, though his notes clearly informed the later Boke of Noblesse. What he did manage to do was to record his thoughts on the subject, and on manie others, with a remarkable frankness and in a way which is most untypical of his other writings, especially The Itineraries. In doing so, he may have achieved something which he certainly never set out to do, and written the earliest English diary that is now available to us. What do we learn from Worcester’s Journal? Principally, I think, that late medieval men (and women) had a much wider variety of opinions than we might think, if we only considered works which were intended to be read by others. For, in William Worcester’s day, there was no ‘Press’ and no recognition of a right to freedom of expression. If a man wrote, or even spoke, words against the King, he might be executed for treason, and in a very horrible way. If he wrote or spoke words critical of the Church or the Faith, he might be burnt at the stake, under the terms of the Statute of Heresy - De Heretico Comburendo - of 1401; but neither of these risks seems to have troubled our William. He that felt he could write what he liked in the privacy of his chamber over the barge-house in Caister Castle, and say what he liked to his friends and acquaintances. His text shines a light into manie dark places. For the sake of clarity I have modernised the punctuation in Worcester’s text and some of the spelling, but not all. Since I thought it was important to retain as much of the flavour of his writing as possible. For those who would like to know more about him, I would recommend the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, and 1 I have included in the text some letters and documents, which were evidently inserted before the Fastolf Papers as a whole were taken by cart from Caister to the recently-founded Magdalen College in Oxford, around 1480.
Recommended publications
  • Stratford's the Merchant of Venice and Alabama Shakespeare Festival's the Winter's Tale
    Vol. XVI THE • VPSTART • CR.OW Editor James Andreas Clemson University Founding Editor William Bennett The University of Tennessee at Martin Associate Editors Michael Cohen Murray State University Herbert Coursen Bowdoin College Charles Frey The University of Washington Marjorie Garber Harvard University Walter Haden The University of Tennessee at Martin Chris Hassel Vanderbilt University Maurice Hunt Baylor University Richard Levin The University of California, Davis John McDaniel Middle Tennessee State University Peter Pauls The University of Winnipeg Jeanne Roberts American University Production Editors Tharon Howard, Suzie Medders, and Deborah Staed Clemson University Editorial Assistants Martha Andreas, Kelly Barnes, Kati Beck, Dennis Hasty, Victoria Hoeglund, Charlotte Holt, Judy Payne, and Pearl Parker Copyright 1996 Clemson University All Rights Reserved Clemson University Digital Press Digital Facsimile Vol. XVI About anyone so great as Shakespeare, it is probable that we can never be right, it is better that we should from time to time change our way of being wrong. - T. S. Eliot What we have to do is to be forever curiously testing new opinions and courting new impressions. -Walter Pater The problems (of the arts) are always indefinite, the results are always debatable, and the final approval always uncertain. -Paul Valery Essays chosen for publication do not necessarily represent opin­ ions of the editor, associate editors, or schools with which any contributor is associated. The published essays represent a diver­ sity of approaches and opinions which we hope will stimulate interest and further scholarship. Subscription Information Two issues- $14 Institutions and Libraries, same rate as individuals- $14 two issues Submission of Manuscripts Essays submitted for publication should not exceed fifteen to twenty double­ spaced typed pages, including notes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Battle Speeches of Henry V
    The Battle Speeches of Henry V Anne Curry University qfSouthampton In the attack on Constantinople in 1204, when Peter of Amiens saw Murzurphlus spurring his horse towards him, he shouted to his followers Now lords, stand firm' We will have a fight on our hands: see the emperor is coming. Take care that there is no one so bold as to run away. But now resolve to stand firm,l Such scenes arc commonplace in medieval chronicles. As Bllese observed, chroniclers wrote hundreds of battle orations. harangues to the knights before or during combat, that show in detail the kinds of motive appeals the chroniclers believed would be most effective in building morale.' . One of the most famous battle speeches of all must be that of Henry V at Agincourt, well known not from its chronicle versions but from the stirring words of Shakespeare.' Shapiro has alerted us to Shakespeare's use of expressions he heard in daily life as well as those he read in the printed histories which informed his works. In the case of the battle speech, Shapiro detects the influence ofa sermon delivered to the royal court on Ash Wednesday 1599 by Lancelot Anclrewes. 4 The theme was war, the context the preparations for the expedition of the earl of Essex to Ireland. Andrewes' 'thumping reiteration of "this time" and "this day''', Shapiro argues, inspired Shakespeares similarly repeated emphasis on 'St Crispin's day'. Shakespearean scholars have detected other influences on the composition of the speech, ranging from popular sayings,' to biblical passages,6 to accounts of other battles in the histories of Hall and Holinshed.' But Henry V's battle speech has a much longer pedigree which can be traced back to the earliest chronicle narratives of the battle.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Southampton Research Repository Eprints Soton
    University of Southampton Research Repository ePrints Soton Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given e.g. AUTHOR (year of submission) "Full thesis title", University of Southampton, name of the University School or Department, PhD Thesis, pagination http://eprints.soton.ac.uk i UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON FACULTY OF HUMANITIES School of History The Wydeviles 1066-1503 A Re-assessment by Lynda J. Pidgeon Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 15 December 2011 ii iii ABSTRACT Who were the Wydeviles? The family arrived with the Conqueror in 1066. As followers in the Conqueror’s army the Wydeviles rose through service with the Mowbray family. If we accept the definition given by Crouch and Turner for a brief period of time the Wydeviles qualified as barons in the twelfth century. This position was not maintained. By the thirteenth century the family had split into two distinct branches. The senior line settled in Yorkshire while the junior branch settled in Northamptonshire. The junior branch of the family gradually rose to prominence in the county through service as escheator, sheriff and knight of the shire.
    [Show full text]
  • Kiils K Qffiel
    KIilS k QffiEl FROM THE REIGN OF WILLIAM THE CONQUEROR R\ ^'Cl TTCtO VICTORIVTflTORTA THTTTtEf t?TDQFIRSTT . §J? <A V WILLIAM THE CONQUfciiOR. 3 PRINT E D ^ •b §M^W:&-'-:. H 1 S T 0 It Y OF THE KINGS & QUEENS OF ENGLAND, WILLIAM THE CONQUEROR Began to Born Reign 1024. Decern. 25, 1066. Died Scptem. 9, Reigned 1087. 21 Years. Surnamed Rufus, from his red hair and florid complexion, was the second surviving son to the Conqueror, and was by his father's will appointed his successor. The Norman barons being dis­ Was natural son of Robert, Duke of Normandy, pleased with this, and looking on his brother Robert and was called the Conqueror because he conquered as the proper owner, a powerful conspiracy was Harold the Dauntless, and overthrew the Saxon therefore formed against William by his uncle Odo. dynasty in thisliountry. He gave out that Edward William, sensible of his danger, was soon in the the Confessor left him the crown of England by field at the head of a powerful army. Robert will, and determining to assert his right to it, lost his opportunity by not assisting his friends, landed in England with an army of 60,000 men, who had taken fortresses on the hopes of his and gave battle at Hastings, where Harold was assurances, and who, when William appeared be­ killed, and his army defeated; after which William fore them, had to implore his mercy. He was became King of England. He was above eight accidentally shot through the heart with an arrow, feet high, strong built, and well proportioned.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Henry 4 Closes in April 1413
    Reigned 1399–1413. The play opens in July 1403; 2 henry 4 closes in April 1413. Written about 1596. Dramatis Personae: Rumor, the presenter Lady Northumberland Lady Percy Mistress Quickly Doll Tearsheet King Henry the Fourth Henry, Prince of Wales; afterwards King Henry the Fifth Thomas of Clarence Prince John of Lancaster Humphrey of Gloucester Earl of Warwick Earl of Westmoreland Earl of Surrey Gower Harcourt Blunt Lord Chief Justice A Servant to the Chief Justice Earl of Northumberland Scroop, Archbishop of York Lord Mowbray Lord Hastings Lord Bardolph Sir John Coleville Travers and Morton Falstaff, Bardolph, Pistol, and a Page Poins and Peto Shallow and Silence, country justices Davy, Shallow’s servant Mouldy, Shadow, Wart, Feeble, and Bullcalf, recruits Fang and Snare, sheriff’s officers Lords and Attendants Officers, Messengers, Soldiers Porter, Drawer, Beadles, Grooms, etc. A Dancer, Speaker of the Epilogue Robin Williams • www.iReadShakespeare.org • www.InternationalShakespeare.center Reigned 1399–1413. The play opens in July 1403; 2 henry 4 closes in April 1413. Written about 1596. Name and title Birth date Death date Age in play Age at death King Henry IV 1367 1413 36/46 46 Son of John of Gaunt; cousin to Richard II. Usurped Richard II and became Henry IV. Henry, Prince of Wales, called Prince Hal sep 1387 1442 of 16/26 35 Also called Henry of Monmouth. Oldest son to King dystentery in Henry IV. Mother is Mary de Bohun. France Thomas, Duke of Clarence 1388 1422 15/25 34 2nd son of Henry IV; brother to Henry V, Gloucester, and Bedford; uncle to Henry VI.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on the Agincourt Roll Author(S): J
    Notes on the Agincourt Roll Author(s): J. Hamilton Wylie Source: Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, Vol. 5 (1911), pp. 105-140 Published by: Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal Historical Society Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3678363 Accessed: 26-06-2016 09:46 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Cambridge University Press, Royal Historical Society are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Transactions of the Royal Historical Society This content downloaded from 128.178.131.113 on Sun, 26 Jun 2016 09:46:50 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms NOTES ON THE AGINCOURT ROLL By J. HAMILTON WYLIE, M.A., D.Litt., F.R.Hist.S. Read April 27, 1911. IF anyone were to ask where he ought to look for the Roll of Agincourt he would probably be told that he would find it in the 'History of the Battle,' published by Sir Harris Nicolas in 1827, in which there are seventy-two pages of printed matter containing 'the names of the Dukes, Earls, Barons, Knights, Esquires, Servitours and others that wer withe the Excellent Prince King Henry the Fifte
    [Show full text]
  • Vi. Town Hermits
    Clay, Rotha Mary., The Hermits and Anchorites of England. Methuen & Co. London, 1914. Larger images available on Historyfish.net Public Domain text transcribed and prepared "as is" for HTML and PDF by Richenda Fairhurst, historyfish.net. September 2008. No commercial permissions granted. Text may contain errors. (Report errors to [email protected], or check historyfish.org for current address.) VI. TOWN HERMITS If a hermit dwell in a borough, town, or city, or nigh thereto where each day he can well beg his daily bread, let him before sunset distribute to Christ’s poor that which remains of his food.—Rule of Hermits, Bodleian MS. The city of London seems a strange place in which to seek solitude, yet there were hermits by Cripple-gate, Aldgate, Bishopsgate, and also near the Tower. In the present Monkwell street stood the cell of St. James, “in the corner towards the west near Cripple-gate,” that is, in the comparatively retired spot formed by the north-west angle of the city wall, between the gate and the bastion which may still be seen in the churchyard of St. Giles. It was an ancient foundation, for the architectural features of the crypt below the chapel were Norman. Brother Warin, chaplain of Richard I dwelt here. It was afterwards granted to Robert Bat, rector of St. Bride’s, with the provision that he entered the hermitage1 immediately and religiously stayed therein. Probably he did not comply with the condition, for Jordan de Eston was subsequently appointed to serve it. One of Henry III’s last nominees was Robert de S.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin Issue 28 Autumn 2017
    BULLETIN ISSUE 28 AUTUMN 2017 The SHA in Paris The SHA at Flammarion’s Observatory The SHA in Cambridge The 1927 Eclipse The SHA in Liverpool The SHA in Cornwall 2017 AUTUMN CONFERENCE Saturday 28th October The conference registration is The first morning session is the 2017 Annual General Meeting John Lee Theatre, Birmingham between 0930 and 1000 at which refreshments are available in the to which all members and & Midland Instute Margaret guests are invited. The AGM Street, Birmingham B3 3BS lecture theatre. The conference starts at 1000 with a welcome by lasts for one hour after which the morning talk begins. the SHA Chairman The first talk is at 1115 and the Bob Bower introduces the The day ends with a talk about morning session ends at 1215 afternoon session at 1330 and Norman Lockyer from the SHA for lunch. The lunch break is there is a break for refreshments Honorary President Dr. Allan until 1330. Please make your at 1530, when tea, coffee and Chapman. The afternoon own arrangements. There is a biscuits will be served. session will end at 5 p.m. and cafe upstairs and a nearby pub. the conference will then close. 10 00 - 1015 10 15 - 1115 1115 - 1215 SHA Chairman Bob Bower Roger Salt Welcomes delegates SHA The Antikythera Mechanism. to the Birmingham 2017 A presentation covering and Midland Instute Roger's research into the ANNUAL ancient Greek analogue for the SHA Autumn GENERAL MEETING Conference computer and orrery 13 30 - 1430 14 30 - 1530 16 00 – 17 00 Eddie Carpenter Professor Donald Kurtz Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Expenses of Thomas Playter of Sotterley, 1459
    THE EXPENSES OF THOMAS PLAYTER OF SOTTERLEY, 1459 - 60 by COLINRICHMOND,B.A.,D.PHIL.,F.R.HIST.S. THOMASPLAYTERWASSirJohn Fastolfs chief legal adviser' and after Fastolf s death on 5 November 1459was retained by his late master's executorsJohn Paston and Thomas Howes. For Playter the period 1459—60, as shown by the bill of expenses printed below,' was thus a particularly busy one. There was much to be done. What mattered most was not routine business such as embracery, but the discussions and working dinners with Master John Stokes, William Wayneflete the Chancellor, John Lord Beauchamp of Powick, William Yelverton, William Jenny, doctors of law and other lawyers, and even (as his 'conceytes' needed urgently to be discovered) William Worcester, Fastolfs secretary and workhorse in general.' The subject of these conversations was, briefly, that version of Fastolfs will, dated 3 November, which John Paston maintained truly reflected the childless old man's last wishes concerning the disposition of his lands after his death. Others, however, were less certain of the authenticity of this nuncupative will, for it varied greatly from earlier versions, most significantly in leaving all the extensive East Anglian properties, including the great house at Caister,4 to Paston himself, and reducing the number of executors from ten to two, of whom one, Thomas Howes, was Fastolfs former chaplain, and the other, John Paston, a principal beneficiary. Too much was at stake for the excluded executors, who included Stokes, Wayneflete, Beauchamp, Yelverton and Worcester, to accept from Paston a document which offered him all that he could desire and gave him the means to obtain it.
    [Show full text]
  • A PORTRAIT of SHAKESPEARE His Life, Times and Words
    THE SHAKESPEARE PROJECT OF CHICAGO presents Peter Garino in A PORTRAIT OF SHAKESPEARE His life, times and words Sandwich Public Library Highland Park Public Library Oak Lawn Public Library St. Charles Public Library Mokena Public Library Vernon Area Public Library Glencoe Public Library THE SHAKESPEARE PROJECT OF CHICAGO IS PROUD TO ANNOUNCE the lineup for our 25th Anniversary Season. “Hamlet” by William Shakespeare, directed by J.R. Sullivan (Oct. 11-17, 2019); “Richard III” by William Shakespeare, directed by Peter Garino (Jan. 10- 16, 2020); “Romeo and Juliet” by William Shakespeare, directed by Michelle Shupe (Feb. 21-27, 2020); “Measure for Measure” by William www.shakespeareprojectchicago.org Shakespeare, directed by Erin Sloan (May 15-21, 2020). For venues and P.O. Box 25126 show times, visit: www.shakespeareprojectchicago.org Chicago, Illinois 60625 773-710-2718 Peter Garino is a founding member of The Shakespeare Project of Chicago and has served as Artistic Director A PORTRAIT OF SHAKESPEARE since June 2010. This past season, he directed The Roaring Girl, appeared as Marcus Andronicus in Titus Featuring selections from… Andronicus and as Helicanus in Pericles, Prince of Tyre. He will direct Richard III in January 2020. Previous appearances with The Shakespeare Project include the Duke of Florence in Women Beware Women, Duke Hamlet, Prince of Denmark Frederick/Duke Senior in As You Like It, Boyet/Anthony Dull in Love's Labour's Lost, Sir Thomas Erpingham and the Duke of Burgundy in Henry V and Tackleton in Charles Dickens' The Cricket on the Hearth. Peter Edward III directed the Chicago premier of Tom Stoppard's Darkside (Incorporating The Dark Side of the Moon by Pink Floyd).
    [Show full text]
  • Where Are the Princes? Register Staff
    s Richard III Society, Inc. Volume XXVI No. 3 Fall, 2001 Where Are The Princes? Register Staff EDITOR: Carole M. Rike 4702 Dryades St. • New Orleans, LA 70115 (504) 897-9673 FAX (504) 897-0125 • e-mail: [email protected] ©2001 Richard III Society, Inc., American Branch. No part may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means — mechanical, RICARDIAN READING EDITOR: Myrna Smith electrical or photocopying, recording or information storage retrieval — P. O. Box 69 • Aransas Pass, TX 78335 without written permission from the Society. Articles submitted by FAX: (361) 758-4084 • e-mail: [email protected] members remain the property of the author. The Ricardian Register is published four times per year. Subscriptions are available at $18.00 ARTIST: Susan Dexter annually. 1510 Delaware Avenue • New Castle, PA 16105-2674 e-mail: [email protected] In the belief that many features of the traditional accounts of the character and career of Richard III are neither supported by sufficient SPECIAL CORRESPONDENT — YORKSHIRE evidence nor reasonably tenable, the Society aims to promote in every Geoffrey Richardson possible way research into the life and times of Richard III, and to secure a re-assessment of the material relating to the period, and of the role in English history of this monarch The Richard III Society is a nonprofit, educational corporation. In This Issue Dues, grants and contributions are tax-deductible to the extent allowed by law. Editorial License, Carole Rike . 3 Dues are $30 annually for U.S. Addresses; $35 for international. Richard & The Parson of Blokesworth Each additional family member is $5.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Beacher
    THE TM 911 Franklin Street Weekly Newspaper Michigan City, IN 46360 Volume 35, Number 44 Thursday, November 7, 2019 A Placeby Williamin Halliar History Lt. Julian Turner talks to the media on the bridge of the USS Indianapolis. All photos by Bob Wellinski. Much has been written about the commissioning homeland. Their youth belies their dedication to the of the U.S. Navy’s new warship, USS Indianapolis, job at hand. Because of the captain and offi cers, the Freedom Class (LCS 17). This story hails from a crew understands the long tradition of ships bear- proud Hoosier who stood in the cold and rain with ing the name Indianapolis, and the even longer 8,000 other patriotic Americans in Burns Harbor, traditions of the U.S. Navy, itself. They appreciate lending our cheers and our hearts to the birth of their place in this continuing saga of history. this ship bearing the name of our capitol city. USS Indianapolis (LCS 17) is the fourth U.S. Here, too, is the story of a young captain and an Navy ship to bear this proud name. The fi rst (ID even younger crew who bear the responsibility of 3865) was commissioned in 1918 and served as a a ship worth more than $400 million to defend our Continued on Page 2 THE THE Page 2 November 7, 2019 November 7, 2019 Page 3 THE 911 Franklin Street • Michigan City, IN 46360 Navy ship commissioned, but protect the delicate electronic 219/879-0088 • FAX 219/879-8070 %HDFKHU&RPSDQ\'LUHFWRU\ it is truly a historic moment equipment required to run e-mail: News/Articles - [email protected] 'RQDQG7RP0RQWJRPHU\ 2ZQHUV email: Classifieds - [email protected] $QGUHZ7DOODFNVRQ (GLWRU to do so on the shores of Lake and control this modern ship.
    [Show full text]