DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

FEDERAL REGISTER Vol. 86 Wednesday No. 123 June 30, 2021 Pages 34591–34904 OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL REGISTER VerDate Sep 11 2014 19:08 Jun 29, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4710 Sfmt 4710 E:\FR\FM\30JNWS.LOC 30JNWS jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with FR_WS II Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 123 / Wednesday, June 30, 2021 The FEDERAL REGISTER (ISSN 0097–6326) is published daily, SUBSCRIPTIONS AND COPIES Monday through Friday, except official holidays, by the Office PUBLIC of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration, under the Federal Register Act (44 U.S.C. Ch. 15) Subscriptions: and the regulations of the Administrative Committee of the Federal Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 Register (1 CFR Ch. I). The Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Assistance with public subscriptions 202–512–1806 Government Publishing Office, is the exclusive distributor of the official edition. Periodicals postage is paid at Washington, DC. General online information 202–512–1530; 1–888–293–6498 Single copies/back copies: The FEDERAL REGISTER provides a uniform system for making available to the public regulations and legal notices issued by Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 Federal agencies. These include Presidential proclamations and Assistance with public single copies 1–866–512–1800 Executive Orders, Federal agency documents having general (Toll-Free) applicability and legal effect, documents required to be published FEDERAL AGENCIES by act of Congress, and other Federal agency documents of public Subscriptions: interest. Assistance with Federal agency subscriptions: Documents are on file for public inspection in the Office of the Federal Register the day before they are published, unless the Email [email protected] issuing agency requests earlier filing. For a list of documents Phone 202–741–6000 currently on file for public inspection, see www.federalregister.gov. The seal of the National Archives and Records Administration The Federal Register Printing Savings Act of 2017 (Pub. L. 115- authenticates the Federal Register as the official serial publication 120) placed restrictions on distribution of official printed copies established under the Federal Register Act. Under 44 U.S.C. 1507, of the daily Federal Register to members of Congress and Federal the contents of the Federal Register shall be judicially noticed. offices. Under this Act, the Director of the Government Publishing The Federal Register is published in paper and on 24x microfiche. Office may not provide printed copies of the daily Federal Register It is also available online at no charge at www.govinfo.gov, a unless a Member or other Federal office requests a specific issue service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office. or a subscription to the print edition. For more information on how to subscribe use the following website link: https:// The online edition of the Federal Register is issued under the www.gpo.gov/frsubs. authority of the Administrative Committee of the Federal Register as the official legal equivalent of the paper and microfiche editions (44 U.S.C. 4101 and 1 CFR 5.10). It is updated by 6:00 a.m. each day the Federal Register is published and includes both text and graphics from Volume 1, 1 (March 14, 1936) forward. For more information, contact the GPO Customer Contact Center, U.S. Government Publishing Office. Phone 202-512-1800 or 866-512- 1800 (toll free). E-mail, gpocusthelp.com. The annual subscription price for the Federal Register paper edition is $860 plus postage, or $929, for a combined Federal Register, Federal Register Index and List of CFR Sections Affected (LSA) subscription; the microfiche edition of the Federal Register including the Federal Register Index and LSA is $330, plus postage. Six month subscriptions are available for one-half the annual rate. The prevailing postal rates will be applied to orders according to the delivery method requested. The price of a single copy of the daily Federal Register, including postage, is based on the number of pages: $11 for an issue containing less than 200 pages; $22 for an issue containing 200 to 400 pages; and $33 for an issue containing more than 400 pages. Single issues of the microfiche edition may be purchased for $3 per copy, including postage. Remit check or money order, made payable to the Superintendent of Documents, or charge to your GPO Deposit Account, VISA, MasterCard, American Express, or Discover. Mail to: U.S. Government Publishing Office—New Orders, P.O. Box 979050, St. Louis, MO 63197-9000; or call toll free 1-866-512-1800, DC area 202-512-1800; or go to the U.S. Government Online Bookstore site, see bookstore.gpo.gov. There are no restrictions on the republication of material appearing in the Federal Register. How To Cite This Publication: Use the volume number and the page number. Example: 86 FR 12345. Postmaster: Send address changes to the Superintendent of Documents, Federal Register, U.S. Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20402, along with the entire mailing label from the last issue received. Prin~d oo recycled papN. VerDate Sep 11 2014 19:08 Jun 29, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4710 Sfmt 4710 E:\FR\FM\30JNWS.LOC 30JNWS jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with FR_WS * III Contents Federal Register Vol. 86, No. 123 Wednesday, June 30, 2021 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Copyright Royalty Board NOTICES PROPOSED RULES Request for Nominations: Determination of Rates and Terms for Public Broadcasting, National Advisory Council for Healthcare Research and 34674–34677 Quality, 34752–34753 Education Department Agriculture Department PROPOSED RULES See Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Proposed Priorities and Definitions: See Federal Crop Insurance Corporation Secretary’s Supplemental Priorities and Definitions for See Food and Nutrition Service Discretionary Grants Programs, 34664–34674 See Foreign Agricultural Service See Forest Service Energy Department NOTICES See Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, PROPOSED RULES Submissions, and Approvals, 34713 Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Dehumidifiers, 34639– Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service 34640 NOTICES Test Procedures for Consumer Products, Early Environmental Assessments; Availability, etc.: Assessment Review—Dehumidifiers, 34640–34644 Determination of Nonregulated Status for Maize NOTICES Developed Using Genetic Engineering for Dicamba, Energy Conservation Program: Glufosinate, Quizalofop, and 2,4- Extension of Interim Waiver to AHT Cooling Systems Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid Resistance, with Tissue- GmbH and AHT Cooling Systems USA Inc. from the specific Glyphosate Resistance Facilitating the Department of Energy Commercial Refrigerator, Production of Hybrid Maize Seed; Reopening of Freezer, and Refrigerator-Freezer Test Procedure, Comment Period, 34714–34715 34727–34730 Okanagan Specialty Fruits Inc.; Availability of a Request, a Financial Assistance for Weatherization Enhancement and Draft Plant Pest Risk Similarity Assessment, and Innovation, 34730–34731 Preliminary Determination for an Extension of Determination of Nonregulated Status for Non- Environmental Protection Agency Browning Apple, 34713–34714 PROPOSED RULES Air Quality State Implementation Plans; Approvals and Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection Promulgations: RULES Missouri; Revision to Emission Data, Emission Fees and Protections for Borrowers Affected by the COVID–19 Process Information Rule, 34677–34679 Emergency under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures NOTICES Act, 34848–34903 Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, NOTICES Submissions, and Approvals, 34745–34748 Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals, 34726–34727 Submissions, and Approvals: Annual Public Water Systems Compliance Report Bureau of the Fiscal Service (Renewal), 34737–34738 NOTICES Application for Reference and Equivalent Method Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Determination (Renewal), 34736–34737 Submissions, and Approvals: Cross-Media Electronic Reporting Rule (Renewal), 34742– Claim Against the United States for the Proceeds of a 34743 Government Check, 34843–34844 EPA’s WaterSense Program (Renewal), 34743–34744 Public Health Emergency Workplace Response System Children and Families Administration (Renewal), 34738 NOTICES Privacy Act; Systems of Records, 34738–34742 Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Proposed CERCLA Settlement Agreement and Order on Submissions, and Approvals: Consent: Head Start Program Performance Standards, 34753–34754 Commonwealth Utilities Corporation Power Plant Site, Rota, Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Civil Rights Commission Islands, 34748 NOTICES Request for Nominations: Meetings: Science Advisory Board, 34744–34745 Nevada Advisory Committee, 34716–34717 Export-Import Bank Commerce Department NOTICES See International Trade Administration Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, See National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Submissions, and Approvals, 34748–34749 VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:41 Jun 29, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4748 Sfmt 4748 E:\FR\FM\30JNCN.SGM 30JNCN jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with CONTENTS IV Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 123 / Wednesday, June 30, 2021 / Contents Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Submissions, and Approvals: RULES Generic Clearance for the Collection
Recommended publications
  • Transgender Equality

    Transgender Equality

    THE REPORT OF THE About the National Center for Transgender Equality The National Center for Transgender Equality (NCTE) is the nation’s leading social justice policy advocacy organization devoted to ending discrimination and violence against transgender people. NCTE was founded in 2003 by transgender activists who recognized the urgent need for policy change to advance transgender equality. NCTE now has an extensive record winning life-saving changes for transgender people. NCTE works by educating the public and by influencing local, state, and federal policymakers to change policies and laws to improve the lives of transgender people. By empowering transgender people and our allies, NCTE creates a strong and clear voice for transgender equality in our nation’s capital and around the country. © 2016 The National Center for Transgender Equality. We encourage and grant permission for the reproduction and distribution of this publication in whole or in part, provided that it is done with attribution to the National Center for Transgender Equality. Further written permission is not required. RECOMMENDED CITATION James, S. E., Herman, J. L., Rankin, S., Keisling, M., Mottet, L., & Anafi, M. (2016).The Report of the 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey. Washington, DC: National Center for Transgender Equality. The Report of the 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey by: Sandy E. James Jody L. Herman Susan Rankin Mara Keisling Lisa Mottet Ma’ayan Anafi December 2016 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ...............................................................................................................1
  • STRENGTHENING ECONOMIC SECURITY for CHILDREN LIVING in LGBT FAMILIES January 2012

    STRENGTHENING ECONOMIC SECURITY for CHILDREN LIVING in LGBT FAMILIES January 2012

    STRENGTHENING ECONOMIC SECURITY FOR CHILDREN LIVING IN LGBT FAMILIES January 2012 Authors In Partnership With A Companion Report to “All Children Matter: How Legal and Social Inequalities Hurt LGBT Families.” Both reports are co-authored by the Movement Advancement Project, the Family Equality Council, and the Center for American Progress. This report was authored by: This report was developed in partnership with: 2 Movement Advancement Project National Association of Social Workers The Movement Advancement Project (MAP) is an independent National Association of Social Workers (NASW) is the largest think tank that provides rigorous research, insight and membership organization of professional social workers in analysis that help speed equality for LGBT people. MAP works the world, with 145,000 members. NASW works to enhance collaboratively with LGBT organizations, advocates and the professional growth and development of its members, to funders, providing information, analysis and resources that create and maintain professional standards, and to advance help coordinate and strengthen their efforts for maximum sound social policies. The primary mission of the social work impact. MAP also conducts policy research to inform the profession is to enhance human well-being and help meet the public and policymakers about the legal and policy needs of basic human needs of all people, with particular attention to LGBT people and their families. For more information, visit the needs and empowerment of people who are vulnerable, www.lgbtmap.org. oppressed, and living in poverty. For more information, visit www.socialworkers.org. Family Equality Council Family Equality Council works to ensure equality for LGBT families by building community, changing public opinion, Acknowledgments advocating for sound policy and advancing social justice for all families.
  • Anti-Gay Curriculum Laws Clifford J

    Anti-Gay Curriculum Laws Clifford J

    SJ Quinney College of Law, University of Utah Utah Law Digital Commons Utah Law Faculty Scholarship Utah Law Scholarship 2017 Anti-Gay Curriculum Laws Clifford J. Rosky S.J. Quinney College of Law, University of Utah, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://dc.law.utah.edu/scholarship Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Human Rights Law Commons, Law and Gender Commons, and the Sexuality and the Law Commons Recommended Citation Rosky, Clifford J., "Anti-Gay Curriculum Laws" (2017). Utah Law Faculty Scholarship. 13. http://dc.law.utah.edu/scholarship/13 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Utah Law Scholarship at Utah Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Utah Law Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Utah Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DRAFT: 117 COLUM. L. REV. ___ (forthcoming 2017) ANTI-GAY CURRICULUM LAWS Clifford Rosky Since the Supreme Court’s invalidation of anti-gay marriage laws, scholars and advocates have begun discussing what issues the LGBT movement should prioritize next. This article joins that dialogue by developing the framework for a national campaign to invalidate anti-gay curriculum laws—statutes that prohibit or restrict the discussion of homosexuality in public schools. These laws are artifacts of a bygone era in which official discrimination against LGBT people was both lawful and rampant. But they are far more prevalent than others have recognized. In the existing literature, scholars and advocates have referred to these provisions as “no promo homo” laws and claimed that they exist in only a handful of states.
  • United States District Court Southern District of Ohio Western Division

    United States District Court Southern District of Ohio Western Division

    Case: 1:13-cv-00501-TSB Doc #: 65 Filed: 12/23/13 Page: 1 of 50 PAGEID #: <pageID> UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION JAMES OBERGEFELL, et al., : Case No. 1:13-cv-501 Plaintiffs, : Judge Timothy S. Black : vs. : : THEODORE E. WYMYSLO, M.D., et al., : Defendants. : FINAL ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION This civil case is before the Court for final decision on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Declaratory Judgment and Permanent Injunction (Doc. 53), the record evidence (Docs. 34, 42-47, 61; see Appendix at pp. 49-50i), Defendants’ memorandum in opposition (Doc. 56), Plaintiffs’ reply (Doc. 62), and oral argument held on December 18, 2013. Plaintiffs include two individuals who entered into legal same-sex marriages in states that provide for such marriages and have been denied recognition of those legal marriages on their spouses’ death certificates by the State of Ohio. Plaintiffs seek a declaratory judgment that, as applied to them, Ohio’s ban on the recognition of legal same-sex marriages granted in other states is unconstitutional; and, therefore, that a permanent injunction compelling Defendants and their officers to recognize Plaintiffs’ marriages on Ohio death certificates is required under the law and the evidence. Also present as a Plaintiff is Robert Grunn, an Ohio funeral director, who seeks a declaration of his rights and duties when preparing death certificates for individuals in same-sex marriages. Defendants are the local and state officers responsible
  • Publication 3319, 2021 Grant Application Package and Guidelines

    Publication 3319, 2021 Grant Application Package and Guidelines

    2022 Grant Application Package and Guidelines TABLE OF CONTENTS MAY 2021 DEAR PROSPECTIVE LOW INCOME TAXPAYER CLINIC GRANT APPLICANT: I am pleased to announce the opening of the 2022 Low Income Taxpayer Clinic (LITC) grant application period, beginning May 3, 2021 through June 18, 2021. We are excited about increasing the number of LITCs and the scope of LITC coverage this year and appreciate your consideration and interest. Under Internal Revenue Code § 7526, the IRS provides matching grants up to $100,000 per year to qualifying organizations representing low-income taxpayers in Internal Revenue Service (IRS) disputes and educating individuals who speak English as a second language (ESL) about their rights and responsibilities as U.S. taxpayers. LITC services must be provided for free or for no more than a nominal fee. To know more about the activities and accomplishments of organizations awarded LITC funding in prior years, see IRS Publication 5066, LITC Program Report. Publication 3319 outlines eligibility requirements for an LITC matching grant and provides application instructions. Topics include: n Statutory eligibility requirements; n Other eligibility and compliance requirements; n Application and selection process; n Standards for operating an LITC; n Reporting responsibilities; n LITC Program Office responsibilities; n Application forms and instructions; and n Reporting forms and instructions. This publication, including the appendices, is a good reference for LITC grant recipients and includes program and grant administration guidance for the grant year. Congress, the IRS, and the Taxpayer Advocate Service remain committed to achieving maximum access to representation for low-income taxpayers. Thus, in awarding 2022 LITC grants, we will continue to work toward the following program goals: n Expanding coverage in areas identified as underserved; and n Ensuring that grant recipients demonstrate that they are serving geographic areas with sizable populations eligible for and requiring LITC services.
  • Warned That Big, Messy AI Systems Would Generate Racist, Unfair Results

    Warned That Big, Messy AI Systems Would Generate Racist, Unfair Results

    JULY/AUG 2021 | DON’T BE EVIL warned that big, messy AI systems would generate racist, unfair results. Google brought her in to prevent that fate. Then it forced her out. Can Big Tech handle criticism from within? BY TOM SIMONITE NEW ROUTES TO NEW CUSTOMERS E-COMMERCE AT THE SPEED OF NOW Business is changing and the United States Postal Service is changing with it. We’re offering e-commerce solutions from fast, reliable shipping to returns right from any address in America. Find out more at usps.com/newroutes. Scheduled delivery date and time depend on origin, destination and Post Office™ acceptance time. Some restrictions apply. For additional information, visit the Postage Calculator at http://postcalc.usps.com. For details on availability, visit usps.com/pickup. The Okta Identity Cloud. Protecting people everywhere. Modern identity. For one patient or one billion. © 2021 Okta, Inc. and its affiliates. All rights reserved. ELECTRIC WORD WIRED 29.07 I OFTEN FELT LIKE A SORT OF FACELESS, NAMELESS, NOT-EVEN- A-PERSON. LIKE THE GPS UNIT OR SOME- THING. → 38 ART / WINSTON STRUYE 0 0 3 FEATURES WIRED 29.07 “THIS IS AN EXTINCTION EVENT” In 2011, Chinese spies stole cybersecurity’s crown jewels. The full story can finally be told. by Andy Greenberg FATAL FLAW How researchers discovered a teensy, decades-old screwup that helped Covid kill. by Megan Molteni SPIN DOCTOR Mo Pinel’s bowling balls harnessed the power of physics—and changed the sport forever. by Brendan I. Koerner HAIL, MALCOLM Inside Roblox, players built a fascist Roman Empire.
  • Toward Equal Rights for Lgbt Employees: Legal and Managerial Implications for Employers

    Toward Equal Rights for Lgbt Employees: Legal and Managerial Implications for Employers

    Ohio Northern University Law Review Volume 43 Issue 1 Article 5 2019 TOWARD EQUAL RIGHTS FOR LGBT EMPLOYEES: LEGAL AND MANAGERIAL IMPLICATIONS FOR EMPLOYERS Michael T. Zugelder Old Dominion University Strome College of Business Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.onu.edu/onu_law_review Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, and the Labor and Employment Law Commons Recommended Citation Zugelder, Michael T. (2019) "TOWARD EQUAL RIGHTS FOR LGBT EMPLOYEES: LEGAL AND MANAGERIAL IMPLICATIONS FOR EMPLOYERS," Ohio Northern University Law Review: Vol. 43 : Iss. 1 , Article 5. Available at: https://digitalcommons.onu.edu/onu_law_review/vol43/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the ONU Journals and Publications at DigitalCommons@ONU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Ohio Northern University Law Review by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@ONU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Zugelder: TOWARD EQUAL RIGHTS FOR LGBT EMPLOYEES: LEGAL AND MANAGERIAL IMPL Toward Equal Rights for LGBT Employees: Legal and Managerial Implications for Employers MICHAEL T. ZUGELDER* American lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) workers have made great strides toward equal employment rights, and the trend toward equal rights is clear. Still, 52% of LGBT workers can be denied employment or fired simply for being LGBT. This state of the law makes the U.S. lag behind many of its major trading partners, who have already established equal employment in their national laws. While there are a number of routes U.S. law may soon take to end LGBT employment discrimination, private firms, especially those with international operations, will need to determine the best course to take.
  • The Biden-Harris Administration's Statement of Drug Policy Priorities

    The Biden-Harris Administration's Statement of Drug Policy Priorities

    EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OFFICE OF NATIONAL DRUG CONTROL POLICY Washington, DC 20503 The Biden-Harris Administration’s Statement of Drug Policy Priorities for Year One The overdose and addiction crisis has taken a heartbreaking toll on far too many Americans and their families. Since 2015, overdose death numbers have risen 35 percent, reaching a historic high of 70,630 deaths in 2019.1 This is a greater rate of increase than for any other type of injury death in the United States.2 Though illicitly manufactured fentanyl and synthetic opioids other than methadone (SOOTM) have been the primary driver behind the increase, overdose deaths involving cocaine and other psychostimulants, like methamphetamine,3 have also risen in recent years, particularly in combination with SOOTM. New data suggest that COVID-19 has exacerbated the epidemic,4, 5 and increases in overdose mortality6 have underscored systemic inequities in our nation’s approach to criminal justice and prevention, treatment, and recovery. President Biden has made clear that addressing the overdose and addiction epidemic is an urgent priority for his administration. In March, the President signed into law the American Rescue Plan, which appropriated nearly $4 billion to enable the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration and the Health Resources and Services Administration to expand access to vital behavioral health services. President Biden has also said that people should not be incarcerated for drug use but should be offered treatment instead. The President has also emphasized the need to eradicate racial, gender, and economic inequities that currently exist in the criminal justice system.
  • Admissions & Continued Occupancy Policy for the Low-Income Public

    Admissions & Continued Occupancy Policy for the Low-Income Public

    ADMISSIONS & CONTINUED OCCUPANCY POLICY FOR THE LOW-INCOME PUBLIC HOUSING PROGRAM Approved by the Board of Commissioners November 16, 2021 by Resolution 22-## Submitted to HUD: November ##, 2021 Table of Contents Chapter 1 OVERVIEW OF THE PROGRAM AND PLAN INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 1-1 PART I: THE PHA I.A. OVERVIEW .................................................................................................................... 1-1 I.B. ORGANIZATION AND STRUCTURE OF THE PHA ................................................. 1-2 I.C. PHA MISSION ................................................................................................................ 1-3 I.D. THE PHA’S COMMITMENT TO ETHICS AND SERVICE ........................................ 1-4 PART II: THE PUBLIC HOUSING PROGRAM II.A. OVERVIEW AND HISTORY OF THE PROGRAM..................................................... 1-5 II.B. PUBLIC HOUSING PROGRAM BASICS..................................................................... 1-6 II.C. PUBLIC HOUSING PARTNERSHIPS .......................................................................... 1-6 II.D. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS .................................................................................. 1-10 PART III: THE ADMISSIONS AND CONTINUED OCCUPANCY POLICIES III.A. OVERVIEW AND PURPOSE OF THE POLICY ........................................................ 1-11 III.B. CONTENTS OF THE POLICY ...................................................................................
  • Lawrence V. Texas

    Lawrence V. Texas

    No. INTHE SUPREME COURT OF TIlE UNITED STATES JOHN GEDDES LAWRENCE AND TYRON GARNER, Petitioners, V. STATE OF TEXAS Respondent. On Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari To The Court Of Appeals Of Texas Fourteenth District PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI Paul M. Smith Ruth E. Harlow William M. Hohengarten Counsel of Record Daniel Mach Patricia M. Logue JENNER& BLOCK, LLC Susan L. Sommer 601 13th Street, N.W. LAMBDALEGALDEFENSE Washington, DC 20005 AND EDUCATION FUND, INC. (202) 639-6000 120 Wall Street, Suite 1500 New York, NY 10005 Mitchell Katine (212) 809-8585 WILLIAMS, BIRNBERG & ANDERSEN,L.L.P. 6671 Southwest Freeway, Suite 303 Houston, Texas 77074 (713) 981-9595 Counsel for Petitioners i QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether Petitioners' criminal convictions under the Texas "Homosexual Conduct" law - which criminalizes sexual intimacy by same-sex couples, but not identical behavior by different-sex couples - violate the Fourteenth Amendment guarantee of equal protection of the laws? 2. Whether Petitioners' criminal convictions for adult consensual sexual intimacy in the home violate their vital interests in liberty and privacy protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment? 3. Whether Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186 (1986), should be overruled? ii PARTIES Petitioners are John Geddes Lawrence and Tyron Garner. Respondent is the State of Texas. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE QUESTIONS PRESENTED ........................... i PARTIES ........................................... ii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .......................... vi OPINIONS AND ORDERS BELOW ................... 1 JURISDICTION ..................................... 1 STATUTORY AND CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS .. 2 STATEMENT OF THE CASE ......................... 2 A. The Homosexual Conduct Law ............ 2 B. Petitioners' Arrests, Convictions, and Appeals ................................ 5 REASONS FOR GRANTING THE WRIT ..............
  • Questions for the Record to the Honorable Gina Raimondo U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation Nomination Hearing January 26, 2021

    Questions for the Record to the Honorable Gina Raimondo U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation Nomination Hearing January 26, 2021

    Questions for the Record to the Honorable Gina Raimondo U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation Nomination Hearing January 26, 2021 Response to Written Questions Submitted by the Hon. Maria Cantwell to the Hon. Gina Raimondo. Digital Trade. Digital trade and the free flow of information across borders is vitally important to the more than 5,000 technology companies in Washington state and our state’s more than $2.8 billion digital export economy. Nationally, U.S. digital exports were worth more than half a trillion dollars in 2019, an increase of more than 50 percent over the past decade. In Washington state, software industry jobs have increased by approximately one-third since 2016, and now account for around half a million jobs in my state. Unfortunately, digital trade barriers and restrictions are proliferating in many countries, which could undermine our nation’s economic recovery and threaten key trade relationships, including the $1.1 trillion trade relationship between the U.S. and Europe. Question 1. If confirmed, will you prioritize digital trade issues and the continued free flow of digital goods and information across borders? Answer. For U.S. companies to compete, they need the ability to – among other things – access networks, transfer data, and use secure data centers of their choice. If confirmed, I will pursue all available avenues to ensuring data flows and cross-border digital trade, whether that is through trade agreements, the World Trade Organization, expansion of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Cross Border Privacy Rules System, or enhancement of the EU-U.S.
  • Romer V. Evans: a Legal and Political Analysis

    Romer V. Evans: a Legal and Political Analysis

    Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality Volume 15 Issue 2 Article 1 December 1997 Romer v. Evans: A Legal and Political Analysis Caren G. Dubnoff Follow this and additional works at: https://lawandinequality.org/ Recommended Citation Caren G. Dubnoff, Romer v. Evans: A Legal and Political Analysis, 15(2) LAW & INEQ. 275 (1997). Available at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/lawineq/vol15/iss2/1 Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality is published by the University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing. Romer v. Evans: A Legal and Political Analysis Caren G. Dubnoff* Introduction Despite the Supreme Court's role as final arbiter of the "law of the land," its power to effect social change is limited. For exam- ple, school desegregation, mandated by the Court in 1954, was not actually implemented until years later when Congress and the President finally took action.1 As a result, prayer in public schools, repeatedly deemed illegal by the Court, continues in many parts of the country even today. 2 To some degree, whether the Court's po- * Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, College of the Holy Cross. Ph.D. 1974, Columbia University; A.B. 1964, Bryn Mawr. The author wishes to thank Jill Moeller for her most helpful editorial assistance. 1. Several studies have demonstrated that Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954), produced little school desegregation by itself. One of the earliest of these was J.W. PELTASON, FIFTY-EIGHT LONELY MEN: SOUTHERN FEDERAL JUDGES AND SCHOOL DESEGREGATION (1961) (demonstrating how district court judges evaded the decision, leaving school segregation largely in place).