DOCSLIB.ORG

Transgender Equality

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Transgender Equality THE REPORT OF THE About the National Center for Transgender Equality The National Center for Transgender Equality (NCTE) is the nation’s leading social justice policy advocacy organization devoted to ending discrimination and violence against transgender people. NCTE was founded in 2003 by transgender activists who recognized the urgent need for policy change to advance transgender equality. NCTE now has an extensive record winning life-saving changes for transgender people. NCTE works by educating the public and by influencing local, state, and federal policymakers to change policies and laws to improve the lives of transgender people. By empowering transgender people and our allies, NCTE creates a strong and clear voice for transgender equality in our nation’s capital and around the country. © 2016 The National Center for Transgender Equality. We encourage and grant permission for the reproduction and distribution of this publication in whole or in part, provided that it is done with attribution to the National Center for Transgender Equality. Further written permission is not required. RECOMMENDED CITATION James, S. E., Herman, J. L., Rankin, S., Keisling, M., Mottet, L., & Anafi, M. (2016).The Report of the 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey. Washington, DC: National Center for Transgender Equality. The Report of the 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey by: Sandy E. James Jody L. Herman Susan Rankin Mara Keisling Lisa Mottet Ma’ayan Anafi December 2016 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ...............................................................................................................1 Executive Summary ...............................................................................................................3 Chapter 1: Introduction ....................................................................................................... 18 Chapter 2: Methodology ..................................................................................................... 21 Chapter 3: Guide to Report and Terminology ...................................................................39 Chapter 4: Portrait of USTS Respondents .........................................................................43 Chapter 5: Family Life and Faith Communities .................................................................64 Chapter 6: Identity Documents .......................................................................................... 81 Chapter 7: Health ...............................................................................................................92 Chapter 8: Experiences at School .................................................................................... 130 Chapter 9: Income and Employment Status .................................................................... 139 Chapter 10: Employment and the Workplace .................................................................. 147 Chapter 11: Sex Work and Other Underground Economy Work ..................................... 157 Chapter 12: Military Service ............................................................................................. 166 Chapter 13: Housing, Homelessness, and Shelter Access ............................................. 175 Chapter 14: Police, Prisons, and Immigration Detention ................................................ 184 Chapter 15: Harassment and Violence ........................................................................... 197 Chapter 16: Places of Public Accommodation and Airport Security .............................. 212 Chapter 17: Experiences in Restrooms ............................................................................224 Chapter 18: Civic Participation and Policy Priorities ...................................................... 231 About the Authors ............................................................................................................. 241 Appendix A: Characteristics of the Sample .....................................................................243 Appendix B: Survey Instrument (Questionnaire) ........................................................... 250 Appendix C: Detailed Methodology ................................................................................ 291 Acknowledgements he report authors extend our gratitude to all the members of the transgender community who participated in the 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey and the hundreds of individuals and organizations that made this T survey report possible. The following individuals in particular are recognized for their contributions during one or more stages of the process, including survey development, implementation, distribution, data preparation and analysis, and reporting: Osman Ahmed Andrew Cray Chai Jindasurat Gabriel Rodenborn M. V. Lee Badgett Kate D’Adamo JoAnne Keatley Shelby Rowe Kellan Baker Laura Durso Elliot Kennedy Brad Sears Genny Beemyn Jake Eleazer Paul Lillig Jama Shelton Aaron Belkin Gary J. Gates Emilia Lombardi Jillian Shipherd Walter Bockting Jaime Grant Jenifer McGuire Sharon Stapel Kyler Broadus Emily Greytak Ilan Meyer Michael Steinberger David Chae Ann Haas Shannon Price Minter Catalina Velasquez Cecilia Chung Jack Harrison-Quintana Aaron Morris Bianca Wilson Loree Cook Daniels Mark Hatzenbuehler Asaf Orr Kerith Conron Darby Hickey Dylan Orr Ruby Corado Lourdes Ashley Hunter Sari Reisner The authors extend special gratitude to the following individuals for their contributions to the project: Ignacio Rivera, Survey Outreach Coordinator, for leading the survey outreach efforts and building a network of individuals and organizations that led to the unprecedented levels of participation in this survey. Andrew Flores for assistance with questionnaire development and the weighting procedures to prepare the data for analysis. Daniel Merson for continued work in cleaning the data set, re-coding the data, and providing population numbers for comparative purposes in the final report. Michael Rauch for programming and implementation of the complex survey. Appreciation is also extended to NCTE interns, law fellows, staff, and volunteers who assisted ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS with the project, including outreach across the country, development of outreach materials, and translation: Bre Kidman Mati Gonzalez Gil Kory Masen Cullen O’Keefe Cyres Gibson Romeo Jackson Imari Moon Nowmee Shehab 1 A special thanks is also extended to USTS Interns, Fellows, and Assistants for their work at various stages of the project: Rodrigo Aguayo-Romero Shabab Mirza Jeymee Semiti Venus Selenite Willem Miller Davida Schiffer Danielle Stevens The authors also thank the USTS Advisory Committee (UAC) members, who devoted their time to the project by giving valuable recommendations around project development and community outreach: Danni Askini Brooke Cerda Guzman Angelica Ross Brynn Tannehill Cherno Biko Trudie Jackson Nowmee Shehab Thomas Coughlin Andrea Jenkins Stephanie Skora Additional acknowledgement goes to the more than 300 transgender, LGBT, and allied organizations that promoted and distributed the survey to its members throughout the country for completion. The authors also acknowledge current and former NCTE staff for their work on the project, particularly: Theo George and Vincent Villano for their pivotal work in survey project development and distribution through their respective roles in digital media and communication strategy. Arli Christian, Joanna Cifredo, K’ai Smith, and Harper Jean Tobin for their contributions as report co-writers, including lending their subject-matter expertise and analysis to the findings included in this report. Various individuals and firms assisted in spreading the word about the survey, both prior to and during the data collection phase, and they also assisted with survey translation, design, and reporting. Thanks goes to: Sean Carlson Anna Zuccaro ThoughtWorks Leah Furumo Design Action Collective TransTech Social Enterprises Molly Haigh Dewey Square Group ZERN Additionally, NCTE would like to express special appreciation to an anonymous donor for providing the largest share of the funds needed to conduct and report on the U.S. Transgender Survey. Other important funders were the Arcus Foundation, the Gill Foundation, the Human Rights Campaign Foundation, and the David Bohnett Foundation. NCTE is also grateful to its other funders, many of which supported this project through general operating support, including the Ford Foundation, the Evelyn & Walter Haas, Jr. Fund, and the Tides Foundation. Finally, NCTE would like to give special thanks to the National LGBTQ Task Force, for its previous partnership in conducting the National Transgender Discrimination Survey as a joint project from 2008 to 2011, as well as for its support of NCTE’s re-development of it as the U.S. Transgender Survey. 2015 U.S. TRANSGENDER SURVEY 2015 U.S. 2 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY USTS Executive Summary he 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey (USTS) is the largest survey examining the experiences of transgender people in the United States, with 27,715 respondents T from all fifty states, the District of Columbia, American Samoa, Guam, Puerto Rico, and U.S. military bases overseas. Conducted in the summer of 2015 by the National Center for Transgender Equality, the USTS was an anonymous, online survey for transgender adults (18 and older) in the United States, available in English and Spanish. The USTS serves as a follow-up to the groundbreaking 2008–09 National Transgender Discrimination Survey (NTDS), which helped to
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Individual Losses to Movement Victories: How Sex Became a Civil Liberty
    Indiana Journal of Law and Social Equality Volume 2 Issue 2 Article 1 Spring 2014 Individual Losses to Movement Victories: How Sex Became a Civil Liberty Dara E. Purvis [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ijlse Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Purvis, Dara E. (2014) "Individual Losses to Movement Victories: How Sex Became a Civil Liberty," Indiana Journal of Law and Social Equality: Vol. 2 : Iss. 2 , Article 1. Available at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ijlse/vol2/iss2/1 This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School Journals at Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Indiana Journal of Law and Social Equality by an authorized editor of Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Indiana Journal of Law and Social Equality Volume 2: Issue 2 Individual Losses to Movement Victories: How Sex Became a Civil Liberty Review by Dara E. Purvis* HOW SEX BECAME A CIVIL LIBERTY. By Leigh Ann Wheeler. New York, New York: Oxford University Press. 2013. For those of us who teach courses relating to sexuality and the law, it can be a Sisyphean task to help contemporary students grasp a world in which giving a lecture about birth control that involved the visual aid of a packet of spermicide could result in criminal prosecution. Yet, in order to understand today’s headlines about legal challenges to required insurance coverage of contraceptives, one must be able to trace how and why political, social, and legal understandings of sexual- ity moved it from a deeply illicit taboo towards constitutionally protected rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Transgender Representation on American Narrative Television from 2004-2014
    TRANSJACKING TELEVISION: TRANSGENDER REPRESENTATION ON AMERICAN NARRATIVE TELEVISION FROM 2004-2014 A Dissertation Submitted to the Temple University Graduate Board In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY by Kelly K. Ryan May 2021 Examining Committee Members: Jan Fernback, Advisory Chair, Media and Communication Nancy Morris, Media and Communication Fabienne Darling-Wolf, Media and Communication Ron Becker, External Member, Miami University ABSTRACT This study considers the case of representation of transgender people and issues on American fictional television from 2004 to 2014, a period which represents a steady surge in transgender television characters relative to what came before, and prefigures a more recent burgeoning of transgender characters since 2014. The study thus positions the period of analysis as an historical period in the changing representation of transgender characters. A discourse analysis is employed that not only assesses the way that transgender characters have been represented, but contextualizes American fictional television depictions of transgender people within the broader sociopolitical landscape in which those depictions have emerged and which they likely inform. Television representations and the social milieu in which they are situated are considered as parallel, mutually informing discourses, including the ways in which those representations have been engaged discursively through reviews, news coverage and, in some cases, blogs. ii To Desmond, Oonagh and Eamonn For everything. And to my mother, Elaine Keisling, Who would have read the whole thing. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Throughout the research and writing of this dissertation, I have received a great deal of support and assistance, and therefore offer many thanks. To my Dissertation Chair, Jan Fernback, whose feedback on my writing and continued support and encouragement were invaluable to the completion of this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Centering Sex Workers' Rights in Prostitution Policy
    Sarah Lawrence College DigitalCommons@SarahLawrence Women's History Theses Women’s History Graduate Program 9-2016 Lone Voice in the Wilderness: Centering Sex Workers’ Rights in Prostitution Policy Emily A. Parker Sarah Lawrence College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.slc.edu/womenshistory_etd Part of the Women's History Commons Recommended Citation Parker, Emily A., "Lone Voice in the Wilderness: Centering Sex Workers’ Rights in Prostitution Policy" (2016). Women's History Theses. 20. https://digitalcommons.slc.edu/womenshistory_etd/20 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Women’s History Graduate Program at DigitalCommons@SarahLawrence. It has been accepted for inclusion in Women's History Theses by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@SarahLawrence. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Capstone Final Draft Emily Parker Lone Voice in the Wilderness: Centering Sex Workers’ Rights in Prostitution Policy Emily Parker Submitted in partial completion of the Master of Arts Degree at Sarah Lawrence College, May 2016 Capstone Final Draft Emily Parker ABSTRACT: Sex work and its legal status is a controversial and divisive subject amongst feminist scholars and lawmakers alike. While sex workers are often subject to violence and discrimination simply by virtue of their labor, legal institutions designed to protect individuals from such experiences tend to exacerbate their impacts on sex workers. Sympathetic lawmakers and scholars have attempted to implement laws to the benefit of sex workers but have struggled to successfully ameliorate the harms they experience both at work and during their everyday lives. This paper attempts to explicate the ways in which purportedly beneficial laws actually work to the detriment of sex workers and how even piecemeal reforms can yield substantial improvements in sex workers’ lives.
    [Show full text]
  • June 7Th and It Is a "E” Day
    Rise and Grind Eagles! Today is Monday, June 7th and it is a "E” day. ** DAILY ATTENDANCE ** Scroll down to the bottom for the Attendance Form! WHAT SHOULD EACH GROUP DO TODAY? BLUE GOLD GRAY - BLUE Follow your schedule in-person. Sign in and complete the Daily Remote learners need to complete the Be in HR by 7:50am (unless you Attendance Form. Do your Daily Attendance Form and login to are AM Harkness or have Senior asynchronous assignments. It is your classes today (teachers stream Privilege), and make sure you still a school day, and students with Google Meets). complete the attendance form! are losing points because they 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5e 5l 6th aren't doing their work! 8:05 9:05 10:05 11:05 12:05 12:40 1:40 IMPORTANT NOTES: Nominate the “Rise & Grind” Teacher of the YEAR! https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfhWcB_s-U5g_ql9QH DDpKFNYCHk9T01b85bKJqQBwcl0sgwg/viewform?usp=sf_link Important Calendar Updates Weds, June 9th - 15th - Graduation Cap/Gown and Ticket Pickup Wednesday, June 16th - Last day of Remote Classes for all students. Select classes will be hosting in-person exam reviews for Regents Exams. Wednesday, June 16th - Senior Walk! Thursday, June 17th - First Day of Regents Exams (Common Core ELA) Thursday, June 17th - High School Musical Premiere! Friday, June 18th - Juneteenth Day (No Student Attendance) Monday, June 21st - Spanish 4 + 5 Final Exams Tuesday, June 22nd - Living Environment (Biology) Regents Exam Wednesday, June 23rd - Algebra I Regents Exam Thursday, June 24th - Earth Science Regents Exam and Rating Day Friday, June 25th - Grad.
    [Show full text]
  • Email to Cedarville University Regarding the Supreme Court Decision on Same-Sex Marriage
    THOMAS WHITE EMAIL TO CEDARVILLE UNIVERSITY REGARDING THE SUPREME COURT DECISION ON SAME-SEX MARRIAGE JUNE 30, 2015 / 105 COMMENTS Below is the email that I sent to the Faculty and Staff at Cedarville University on Saturday, June 27, 2015. I am posting it here so that students, parents, alumni, and friends can join in praying for Cedarville University in the coming days and specifically praying that God would visit our campus in a unique way this fall. I want to see God move like He did during the Great Awakenings and for all of us to come to clearer realization of who we are, who God is and to be more like Jesus. Dear Cedarville Family, Today, I am in Seattle, WA for an alumni meeting. Tomorrow, just blocks from my hotel room rainbow banners mark the route where a gay pride parade will celebrate, as none have in the past, the recent ruling of the Supreme Court. I could not help but reflect upon the rainbow, a symbol of God’s mercy, which has been turned to mean something very different. I am burdened for our nation and for so many people hopelessly looking for fulfillment down the dead end road of a sexual revolution. They will soon discover the emptiness of their journey, and amidst their eventual despair, we must be ready to present a biblical worldview and the hope of the Gospel with more clarity, compassion, and boldness than ever before. Walking beneath the banners, I found myself thinking back to Daniel and what he must have experienced as he remained faithful in a much more secular culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Building a Fair and Just New York: Decriminalize Transactional Sex Frankie Herrmann
    Hastings Race and Poverty Law Journal Volume 15 | Number 1 Article 2 1-1-2018 Building a Fair and Just New York: Decriminalize Transactional Sex Frankie Herrmann Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/ hastings_race_poverty_law_journal Part of the Law and Race Commons Recommended Citation Frankie Herrmann, Building a Fair and Just New York: Decriminalize Transactional Sex, 15 Hastings Race & Poverty L.J. 51 (2018). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_race_poverty_law_journal/vol15/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Race and Poverty Law Journal by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 7 - HERMANN_MACRO.DOCX (DO NOT DELETE) 7/20/2018 5:28 PM Building a Fair and Just New York: Decriminalize Transactional Sex FRANKIE HERRMANN† Introduction.............................................................................................................. 57 I. How Did We Get Here? Legal and Judicial Systems in New York .................... 59 A. Why Is Sex Work Criminalized in New York? ...................................... 59 1. Prostitution has Its Roots in Inequities and a History of Harm Reduction....................................................................................... 60 2. Criminalization Came from the Advocacy of a Wealthy Few.................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • LGBTQ History at Rutgers University 1969 Sophomore Lionel Cuffie
    LGBTQ History at Rutgers University 1969 Sophomore Lionel Cuffie establishes the Rutgers Student Homophile League on the College Avenue campus in New Brunswick. It was the first openly homosexual organization in New Jersey and one of the oldest organizations on a college campus nationwide. Over time, the league evolved into the Bisexual, Gay, and Lesbian Alliance of Rutgers University (BiGLARU) and is now known as the Queer Student Alliance (QSA) 1970 The League sets up office in the Rutgers Student Center and holds weekly meetings on the College Avenue campus and discussion groups and socials on the Busch and Douglass campuses. 1974 Rutgers holds its first Blue Jeans Day to raise awareness about gay and lesbian issues among the student population. 1976 The School of Law-Newark organizes the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Caucus to represent LGBT interests and raise awareness on campus. The caucus also encourages the study of law affecting the LGBT community. 1981 Rutgers adopts policies prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation, amending anti-discrimination policies first adopted in 1974. 1988 President Edward J. Bloustein establishes the President’s Select Committee for Lesbian- Gay Concerns and directs the New Brunswick, Newark, and Camden provosts to identify a student affairs staff member to assume responsibility for lesbian and gay concerns. These liaisons were responsible for protecting the interests of lesbians and gay men, and later bisexual and transgender individuals, at Rutgers. 1989 David Nichols and Morris J. Kafka-Hozschlag publishes “The Rutgers University Lesbian/Gay Alliance, 1969-1989: The First Twenty Five Years,” a special issue of The Journal of the Rutgers University Libraries.
    [Show full text]
  • Bob the Drag Queen and Peppermint's Star Studded “Black Queer Town Hall”
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE BOB THE DRAG QUEEN AND PEPPERMINT’S STAR STUDDED “BLACK QUEER TOWN HALL” IS A REMINDER: BLACK QUEER PEOPLE GAVE US PRIDE Laverne Cox, Mj Rodriguez, Angelica Ross, Todrick Hall, Monet X Change, Isis King, Tiq Milan, Shea Diamond, Alex Newell, and Basit Among Participants NYC Pride and GLAAD to Support Three Day Virtual Event to Raise Funds for Black Queer Organizations and NYC LGBTQ Performers on June 19, 20, 21 New York, NY, Friday, June 12, 2020 – Advocates and entertainers Peppermint and Bob the Drag Queen, today announced the “Black Queer Town Hall,” one of NYC Pride’s official partner events this year. NYC Pride and GLAAD, the global LGBTQ media advocacy organization, will stream the virtual event on YouTube and Facebook pages each day from 6:30-8pm EST beginning on Friday, June 19 and through Sunday, June 21, 2020. Performers and advocates slated to appear include Laverne Cox, Mj Rodriguez, Angelica Ross, Todrick Hall, Monet X Change, Isis King, Shea Diamond, Tiq Milan, Alex Newell, and Basit. Peppermint and Bob the Drag Queen will host and produce the event. For a video featuring Peppermint and Bob the Drag Queen and more information visit: https://www.gofundme.com/f/blackqueertownhall The “Black Queer Town Hall” will feature performances, roundtable discussions, and fundraising opportunities for #BlackLivesMatter, Black LGBTQ organizations, and local Black LGBTQ drag performers. The new event replaces the previously announced “Pride 2020 Drag Fest” and will shift focus of the event to center Black queer voices. During the “Black Queer Town Hall,” a diverse collection of LGBTQ voices will celebrate Black LGBTQ people and discuss pathways to dismantle racism and white supremacy.
    [Show full text]
  • United States District Court Southern District of Ohio Western Division
    Case: 1:13-cv-00501-TSB Doc #: 65 Filed: 12/23/13 Page: 1 of 50 PAGEID #: <pageID> UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION JAMES OBERGEFELL, et al., : Case No. 1:13-cv-501 Plaintiffs, : Judge Timothy S. Black : vs. : : THEODORE E. WYMYSLO, M.D., et al., : Defendants. : FINAL ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION This civil case is before the Court for final decision on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Declaratory Judgment and Permanent Injunction (Doc. 53), the record evidence (Docs. 34, 42-47, 61; see Appendix at pp. 49-50i), Defendants’ memorandum in opposition (Doc. 56), Plaintiffs’ reply (Doc. 62), and oral argument held on December 18, 2013. Plaintiffs include two individuals who entered into legal same-sex marriages in states that provide for such marriages and have been denied recognition of those legal marriages on their spouses’ death certificates by the State of Ohio. Plaintiffs seek a declaratory judgment that, as applied to them, Ohio’s ban on the recognition of legal same-sex marriages granted in other states is unconstitutional; and, therefore, that a permanent injunction compelling Defendants and their officers to recognize Plaintiffs’ marriages on Ohio death certificates is required under the law and the evidence. Also present as a Plaintiff is Robert Grunn, an Ohio funeral director, who seeks a declaration of his rights and duties when preparing death certificates for individuals in same-sex marriages. Defendants are the local and state officers responsible
    [Show full text]
  • Phallo-After-Meta.Pdf
    SURGEON'S CORNER The Surgical Techniques and Outcomes of Secondary Phalloplasty After Metoidioplasty in Transgender Men: An International, Multi-Center Case Series Muhammed Al-Tamimi, MD,1,2,3 Garry L. Pigot, MD,2,3 Wouter B. van der Sluis, MD, PhD,1,3 Tim C. van de Grift, MBA, MD, PhD,1,3,4 R. Jeroen A. van Moorselaar, MD, PhD,2 Margriet G. Mullender, MBA, PhD,1,3,4 Romain Weigert, MD,5 Marlon E. Buncamper, MD, PhD,1,3,4,6 Müjde Özer, MD,1,3,4 Kristin B. de Haseth, MD,1,4 Miroslav L. Djordjevic, MD, PhD,7 Christopher J. Salgado, MD,8 Maud Belanger, MD, PhD,9 Sinikka Suominen, MD, PhD,10 Maija Kolehmainen, MD,10 Richard A. Santucci, MD,11 Curtis N. Crane, MD,11 Karel E. Y. Claes, MD,12 Stan Monstrey, MD, PhD,12 and Mark-Bram Bouman, MD, PhD1,3,4,6 ABSTRACT Introduction: Some transgender men express the wish to undergo genital gender-affirming surgery. Metoi- dioplasty and phalloplasty are procedures that are performed to construct a neophallus. Genital gender-affirming surgery contributes to physical well-being, but dissatisfaction with the surgical results may occur. Disadvantages of metoidioplasty are the relatively small neophallus, the inability to have penetrative sex, and often difficulty with voiding while standing. Therefore, some transgender men opt to undergo a secondary phalloplasty after metoidioplasty. Literature on secondary phalloplasty is scarce. Aim: Explore the reasons for secondary phalloplasty, describe the surgical techniques, and report on the clinical outcomes. Methods: Transgender men who underwent secondary phalloplasty after metoidioplasty were retrospectively identified in 8 gender surgery clinics (Amsterdam, Belgrade, Bordeaux, Austin, Ghent, Helsinki, Miami, and Montreal).
    [Show full text]
  • Report of Lgbtq Campus Climate Task Force
    REPORT OF LGBTQ CAMPUS CLIMATE TASK FORCE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT NEW PALTZ July 2013; Revised November 2013 LGBTQ Campus Climate Task Force Members: Karl Bryant: Faculty / Sociology / Women’s, Gender, & Sexuality Studies Rachel Dornheim: Student / Queer Student Union Thomas Gaffney: Staff / Human Resources Morgan Gwenwald: Faculty / Sojourner Truth Library Dana Hershkowitz: Student/Student Association (Fall 2013) Benjamin Junge: Faculty / Anthropology Lisa Kozlowski: Staff / Human Resources Tanhena Pacheco Dunn: Staff / Compliance and Campus Climate Michael Patterson, Chair: Staff / Student Activities & Union Services James Schiffer: Faculty / English Shane Triano: Student / Student Association (Spring 2013) Marcia Roth Tucci: Staff / Academic Advising Brendan Wright: Student / Residence Hall Student Association i | P a g e EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS The LGBTQ Task Force has been charged with making recommendations for improvement of the campus climate for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer students, faculty, and staff at SUNY New Paltz. Using data collected through the Campus Climate Survey, on-campus focus groups, and a Campus Pride Index assessment, we provide recommendations divided by in-progress status and priority. The recommendations are drawn from the following categories: Policy Review, Communications and Institutional Response, Binary/Sex Gender Issues, Coordination and Networks of Support, Training and Education, Academic Issues, Employee Issues, and Implementation and Ongoing Assessment. It is important to note that SUNY New Paltz has already begun to address a number of the concerns identified in this report. These recommendations have been included in this report in order to illustrate positive movement forward in addressing the experience for LGBTQ people at SUNY New Paltz.
    [Show full text]
  • Toward Equal Rights for Lgbt Employees: Legal and Managerial Implications for Employers
    Ohio Northern University Law Review Volume 43 Issue 1 Article 5 2019 TOWARD EQUAL RIGHTS FOR LGBT EMPLOYEES: LEGAL AND MANAGERIAL IMPLICATIONS FOR EMPLOYERS Michael T. Zugelder Old Dominion University Strome College of Business Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.onu.edu/onu_law_review Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, and the Labor and Employment Law Commons Recommended Citation Zugelder, Michael T. (2019) "TOWARD EQUAL RIGHTS FOR LGBT EMPLOYEES: LEGAL AND MANAGERIAL IMPLICATIONS FOR EMPLOYERS," Ohio Northern University Law Review: Vol. 43 : Iss. 1 , Article 5. Available at: https://digitalcommons.onu.edu/onu_law_review/vol43/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the ONU Journals and Publications at DigitalCommons@ONU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Ohio Northern University Law Review by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@ONU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Zugelder: TOWARD EQUAL RIGHTS FOR LGBT EMPLOYEES: LEGAL AND MANAGERIAL IMPL Toward Equal Rights for LGBT Employees: Legal and Managerial Implications for Employers MICHAEL T. ZUGELDER* American lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) workers have made great strides toward equal employment rights, and the trend toward equal rights is clear. Still, 52% of LGBT workers can be denied employment or fired simply for being LGBT. This state of the law makes the U.S. lag behind many of its major trading partners, who have already established equal employment in their national laws. While there are a number of routes U.S. law may soon take to end LGBT employment discrimination, private firms, especially those with international operations, will need to determine the best course to take.
    [Show full text]