Meng Mechanical Engineering the Spherical Revolution

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Meng Mechanical Engineering the Spherical Revolution MEng Mechanical Engineering The Spherical Revolution: Development and Promotion of an Open-source & Arduino-based Spherical Drive System in the Maker Community Alex DUNNETT May, 2020 Supervisor: David Polson Thesis submitted to the University of Sheffield in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Engineering 1 PROJECT SUMMARY To promote consideration of omnidirectional actuators in a more diverse number of ap- plications; an open-source omnidirectional actuator was conceptualized, designed, con- structed and tested. Upon selection of a spherical motor configuration for the actuator, further research was conducted to determine which technology would could be adapted to power it. The research concluded with a selection of brushless DC motor technology as a means to actuate the spherical motor drive, with an emphasis on linear induction technology. To promote the development of omnidirectional drive systems within the open-source com- munity a set of generalised performance metrics was developed. Initially work was undertaken to better understand the principles behind linear induction and permanent magnet motor technology. Maxwell’s equations as well as insight from aca- demic literature on the subject were then used to construct an analytical model in MATLAB. The model was validated through both numerical and experimental means. Optimum design parameters, based on the recommendations of the design tool, were used to propose a design foundation from which a number of design concepts were generated. The designs were generated with consideration to the manufacturing capabilities of the IForge and the cost of materials. In parallel to the physical design, and working within the constraints of accessibility and Arduino-based hardware, a three phase open-source motor controller was developed. On account of Covid-19, the decision was taken to continue manufacture as accessibility was a design consideration. Third party suppliers were sourced in order to help build the components. In order to achieve this within an expanded, but still small, budget significant redesign was undertaken. The motor was then switched on and and an attempt to characterise performance was made. The findings were uploaded to the Project’s hackaday page in addition to a video which explained how any viewer could go about constructing their own device, starting with the motor controller and power supply. i CONTENTS 1 Project Summary i 2 Introduction 1 2.1 Omni-Directional Drives ................................ 1 2.2 Limitations of Omnidirectional Drives ........................ 2 2.3 The Maker Community ................................. 3 3 Literature Review 4 3.1 Methods of Omnidirectional Drive .......................... 4 3.1.1 Mecanum Wheels ................................ 4 3.1.2 Swerve Drive ................................... 4 3.1.3 Ball Drive ..................................... 4 3.2 Omnidirectional Drive Selection ............................ 5 3.3 Overview of the Arduino Platform ........................... 5 3.4 Omnidirectional Drive Systems ............................ 6 3.4.1 Ultrasonic Motors ................................ 7 3.4.2 Single-Stator Ultrasonic Motors (SSUM) .................. 7 3.4.3 Multi-stator Ultrasonic Motors (MSUM) .................. 8 3.4.4 Inverse Mouse Drives (IMD) .......................... 9 3.4.5 Stepper Motor .................................. 10 3.4.6 Linear Induction Motor (LIM) ......................... 12 3.4.7 Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor (PMSM) ............. 14 3.5 Technology Selection .................................. 15 3.6 Conclusion from Literature Review .......................... 15 3.7 Aims & Objectives .................................... 16 4 Theory 17 4.1 The Maxwell Equations ................................. 17 4.1.1 Faraday’s Law .................................. 17 4.1.2 Lenz’s Law .................................... 17 4.1.3 Biot-Savart Law ................................. 18 4.1.4 Lorentz Equation ................................ 18 4.2 Linear Induction Motor ................................. 18 4.2.1 Operating Principles of the Induction Motor ................ 19 ii 4.2.2 LIM Topologies: Single-sided LIM ....................... 21 5 Modelling 22 5.1 Analytical Design Tool .................................. 22 5.1.1 Key Design Parameters ............................. 22 5.1.2 Analytical Methodology ............................ 23 5.2 Validation ......................................... 24 5.2.1 Analytical ..................................... 25 5.2.2 Experimental ................................... 25 5.2.3 Numerical .................................... 26 5.2.4 Conclusion .................................... 26 6 Arduino Motor Controller 27 6.1 Motor Controller Design Specification ........................ 27 6.2 Code Development ................................... 28 6.2.1 SPWM Signal ................................... 28 6.2.2 Polarity Switching ................................ 29 6.2.3 Adaption for Three Phase Inversion ..................... 30 6.2.4 Testing ...................................... 31 7 System Analysis 32 7.1 Generic Metrics ..................................... 32 7.1.1 Inertia ....................................... 33 7.1.2 Torque ...................................... 33 7.1.3 Driving Frequency ................................ 33 7.1.4 Efficiency ..................................... 33 7.1.5 Uniformity .................................... 34 7.2 Specific Metrics ..................................... 34 7.2.1 Goodness Factor ................................ 34 7.2.2 Magnetic Flux Linkage ............................. 35 8 Optimised Design 36 8.1 Independent Design Parameters ........................... 36 8.2 Dependent Design Parameters ............................ 36 8.3 Optimisation of Key Parameters ............................ 36 8.3.1 Scale Factor and Rotor Material ....................... 37 8.3.2 AWG ........................................ 38 iii 8.3.3 Permanent Magnet Grade ........................... 38 9 Design for Manufacture 39 9.1 Concept Generation and Design Selection ..................... 39 9.2 Covid 19 .......................................... 40 9.3 Stator ........................................... 40 9.3.1 Windings ..................................... 41 9.4 Rotor ............................................ 41 9.4.1 Rotor Core .................................... 42 9.4.2 Support Structure ............................... 42 9.4.3 Prototype ..................................... 43 9.5 Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor ....................... 43 9.5.1 Permanent Magnet Synchronous Rotor ................... 43 10 Testing Methodology 45 10.1 Sense Rig ......................................... 45 10.1.1 Peak Current .................................. 45 10.1.2 Peak Voltage ................................... 46 10.1.3 Flux Density ................................... 46 10.1.4 Angular Acceleration .............................. 46 11 Results 47 11.1 Characterisation of a Dysfunctional Omnidirectional Drive System ....... 47 12 Engagement with Open-Source Community 49 12.1 Hackaday ......................................... 49 12.2 YouTube .......................................... 49 13 Discussion 50 13.1 Future Work ....................................... 50 14 Appendix A ix 14.1 Motor Controller Theory ................................ ix 14.1.1 SPWM Production ............................... ix 15 Microcontroller theory x 15.0.1 Lower Frequency Limit ............................. x 15.0.2 Upper Frequency Limit ............................. xi iv 15.0.3 Interrupts .................................... xi 15.0.4 Component Selection ............................. xi 16 Appendix B xiii 17 Appendix C xix 17.1 Fritzing Diagram of 3 Phase Motor Controller .................... xxiii 18 Appendix D xxiv v NOMENCLATURE The next list... Physical Constants −12 −3 −1 ϵ0 Permittivity of Free Space 8:8542 × 10 m kg µS Relative Permeability of Mild Steel 1000 −3 ρCu1 Density of Copper 8; 940 kg:m −8 ρCu2 Resistivity of Copper 1:71 × 10 Ω:m −3 ρCu1 Density of Steel 7; 750 kg:m −7 ρCu2 Resistivity of Steel 1:18 × 10 Ω:m −3 ρCu1 Density of Aluminium 2; 700 kg:m −7 ρCu2 Resistivity of Aluminium 2:65 × 10 Ω:m −3 ρCu1 Density of ABS 1; 040 kg:m 16 ρCu2 Resistivity of ABS 1:50 × 10 Ω:m −3 ρCu1 Density of Air 1:225 kg:m 16 ρCu2 Resistivity of Air 1:30 × 10 Ω:m Design Parameters (Default Values) l Stator Width 0:06 m Rin Stator Inner Radius 0:05 m ϕ Phases 3 p Number of Poles 4 −3 δairgap Airgap 2 × 10 m Fbf Bearing Friction 0 N R Rotor Diameter 0:1 m δShell Shell Thickness 0:03 m ! Frequency 1 Hz Ipeak Current Limit 4 A Vpeak DC Source Voltage 12 V R0 DC Internal Resistance 1:5 Ω Rload Additional Circuit Resistance 0 Ω Slotw Slot Width 0:005m vi Sloth Slot Height 0:01m N45 Neodymium Magnet Rating −3 XPM Permanent Magnet Cube Length 5 × 10 m Key Design Parameter MShell Rotor Shell Material MCore Rotor Core Material SF Linear Size Scale Factor ACoil American Wire Gauge of Coil AW G Physical Quantities E Electric Flux Density C:m−2 B Magnetic Flux Density T Φ Magnetic Flux Linkage T G Goodness Factor qenc Enclosed Charge C Ienc Enclosed Current A S Slip J Current Density Am−2 XL Reactance Ω XR Resistance Ω Z Impedance Ω Mathematical Notation −! B Denotes Vector Field × Denotes Cross Product ◦ Denotes Dot Product n^ Denotes Normal Vector H Denotes Surface Integral vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to take this opportunity to thank the following
Recommended publications
  • Axial-Flux Permanent-Magnet Dual-Rotor Generator for a Counter-Rotating Wind Turbine
    energies Article Axial-Flux Permanent-Magnet Dual-Rotor Generator for a Counter-Rotating Wind Turbine Filip Kutt *,† , Krzysztof Blecharz † and Dariusz Karkosi ´nski † Faculty of Electrical and Control Engineering, Gda´nskUniversity of Technology, 80-233 Gda´nsk,Poland; [email protected] (K.B.); [email protected] (D.K.) * Correspondence: fi[email protected]; Tel.: +48-58-347-19-39 † These authors contributed equally to this work. Received: 31 March 2020; Accepted: 26 May 2020; Published: 2 June 2020 Abstract: Coaxial counter-rotating propellers have been widely applied in ships and helicopters for improving the propulsion efficiency and offsetting system reactive torques. Lately, the counter-rotating concept has been introduced into the wind turbine design. Distributed wind power generation systems often require a novel approach in generator design. In this paper, prototype development of axial-flux generator with a counter-rotating field and armature is presented. The design process was composed of three main steps: analytical calculation, FEM simulation and prototype experimental measurements. The key aspect in the prototype development was the mechanical construction of two rotating components of the generator. Sturdy construction was achieved using two points of contact between both rotors via the placement of the bearing between the inner and outer rotor. The experimental analysis of the prototype generator has been conducted in the laboratory at the dynamometer test stand equipped with a torque sensor. The general premise for the development of such a machine was an investigation into the possibility of developing a dual rotor wind turbine. The proposed solution had to meet certain criteria such as relatively simple construction of the generator and the direct coupling between the generator and the wind turbines.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016-09-27-2-Generator-Basics
    Generator Basics Basic Power Generation • Generator Arrangement • Main Components • Circuit – Generator with a PMG – Generator without a PMG – Brush type –AREP •PMG Rotor • Exciter Stator • Exciter Rotor • Main Rotor • Main Stator • Laminations • VPI Generator Arrangement • Most modern, larger generators have a stationary armature (stator) with a rotating current-carrying conductor (rotor or revolving field). Armature coils Revolving field coils Main Electrical Components: Cutaway Main Electrical Components: Diagram Circuit: Generator with a PMG • As the PMG rotor rotates, it produces AC voltage in the PMG stator. • The regulator rectifies this voltage and applies DC to the exciter stator. • A three-phase AC voltage appears at the exciter rotor and is in turn rectified by the rotating rectifiers. • The DC voltage appears in the main revolving field and induces a higher AC voltage in the main stator. • This voltage is sensed by the regulator, compared to a reference level, and output voltage is adjusted accordingly. Circuit: Generator without a PMG • As the revolving field rotates, residual magnetism in it produces a small ac voltage in the main stator. • The regulator rectifies this voltage and applies dc to the exciter stator. • A three-phase AC voltage appears at the exciter rotor and is in turn rectified by the rotating rectifiers. • The magnetic field from the rotor induces a higher voltage in the main stator. • This voltage is sensed by the regulator, compared to a reference level, and output voltage is adjusted accordingly. Circuit: Brush Type (Static) • DC voltage is fed External Stator (armature) directly to the main Source revolving field through slip rings.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit VI Superconductivity JIT Nashik Contents
    Unit VI Superconductivity JIT Nashik Contents 1 Superconductivity 1 1.1 Classification ............................................. 1 1.2 Elementary properties of superconductors ............................... 2 1.2.1 Zero electrical DC resistance ................................. 2 1.2.2 Superconducting phase transition ............................... 3 1.2.3 Meissner effect ........................................ 3 1.2.4 London moment ....................................... 4 1.3 History of superconductivity ...................................... 4 1.3.1 London theory ........................................ 5 1.3.2 Conventional theories (1950s) ................................ 5 1.3.3 Further history ........................................ 5 1.4 High-temperature superconductivity .................................. 6 1.5 Applications .............................................. 6 1.6 Nobel Prizes for superconductivity .................................. 7 1.7 See also ................................................ 7 1.8 References ............................................... 8 1.9 Further reading ............................................ 10 1.10 External links ............................................. 10 2 Meissner effect 11 2.1 Explanation .............................................. 11 2.2 Perfect diamagnetism ......................................... 12 2.3 Consequences ............................................. 12 2.4 Paradigm for the Higgs mechanism .................................. 12 2.5 See also ...............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Why the Exlar T-LAM™ Servo Motors Have Become the New Standard of Comparison for Maximum Torque Density and Power Efficiency
    Why the Exlar T-LAM™ Servo Motors have Become the New Standard of Comparison for Maximum Torque Density and Power Efficiency By Richard Welch Jr. - Consulting Engineer November 3, 2008 Introduction According to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) 63-65% of a typical manufacturing plant’s monthly electric bill goes to pay for all the electricity consumed by the electric motors operating in the plant. Hence, with a steady rise in electricity cost along with constant pressure to lower manufacturing cost, if you ask plant managers to describe the three most important words associated with electric motors they quickly respond by saying its “efficiency”, “efficiency” and “efficiency”. As you can see, no matter how you arrange these three words “efficiency” is always at the top of your list. Furthermore, systems and design engineers who build equipment used in manufacturing plants constantly search for electric motors that provide the “most bang for least buck”. Therefore, producing electric motors that have the highest obtainable torque density (i.e., continuous torque output per motor volume) along with maximum power efficiency has become a real challenge for all motor manufacturers. To meet this challenge for both high torque density and maximum power efficiency, Exlar has developed its T-LAM™ stator that’s now being used in all SLM and SLG brushless DC servo motors and in all GSX and GSM rotary actuators [1]. Hence, the focus of this paper is to show you graphically why the T-LAM servo motor has become the new standard of comparison for torque density and power efficiency.
    [Show full text]
  • ON Semiconductor Is
    ON Semiconductor Is Now To learn more about onsemi™, please visit our website at www.onsemi.com onsemi and and other names, marks, and brands are registered and/or common law trademarks of Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC dba “onsemi” or its affiliates and/or subsidiaries in the United States and/or other countries. onsemi owns the rights to a number of patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets, and other intellectual property. A listing of onsemi product/patent coverage may be accessed at www.onsemi.com/site/pdf/Patent-Marking.pdf. onsemi reserves the right to make changes at any time to any products or information herein, without notice. The information herein is provided “as-is” and onsemi makes no warranty, representation or guarantee regarding the accuracy of the information, product features, availability, functionality, or suitability of its products for any particular purpose, nor does onsemi assume any liability arising out of the application or use of any product or circuit, and specifically disclaims any and all liability, including without limitation special, consequential or incidental damages. Buyer is responsible for its products and applications using onsemi products, including compliance with all laws, regulations and safety requirements or standards, regardless of any support or applications information provided by onsemi. “Typical” parameters which may be provided in onsemi data sheets and/ or specifications can and do vary in different applications and actual performance may vary over time. All operating parameters, including “Typicals” must be validated for each customer application by customer’s technical experts. onsemi does not convey any license under any of its intellectual property rights nor the rights of others.
    [Show full text]
  • Tradeoff Between Efficiency and Melting for a High
    1 Tradeoff between Efficiency and Melting for a High-Performance Electromagnetic Rail Gun William C. McCorkle and Thomas B. Bahder Army Aviation and Missile Research, Development, and Engineering Center, Redstone Arsenal, AL 35898 USA Email: [email protected] Abstract— We estimate the temperature distribution in the and the historical lack of understanding of the reasons for the rails of an electromagnetic rail gun (EMG) due to the confinement low endurance of the gun rails in service, sometimes limited to of the current in a narrow surface layer resulting from the skin one shot at maximum energies before replacement is needed. effect. In order to obtain analytic results, we assume a simple geometry for the rails, an electromagnetic skin effect boundary For high-performance EMGs, in order to increase the arma- edge that propagates with the accelerating armature, and a ture velocity while keeping the length of the rails fixed, the current carrying channel controlled by magnetic field diffusion current pulse during firing must be shorter and have a higher into the rails. We compute the temperature distribution in the average amplitude, causing a stronger skin effect in the rails, rails at the time that the armature leaves the rails. For the range which leads to an increase in Joule heating of the rails. In this of exit velocities, from 1500 m/s to 5000 m/s, we find the highest temperatures are near the gun breech. After a single gun firing, paper, we show that the EMG efficiency is higher at higher the temperature reaches the melting temperature of the metal velocity, but there is increased melting of the rails, leading to rails in a layer of finite thickness near the surface of the rails, a tradeoff between efficiency of the EMG and melting of the for rails made of copper or tantalum.
    [Show full text]
  • Hyperloop, ¿El Transporte Del Futuro? Comparativa Y Análisis Dinámico
    HYPERLOOP, ¿EL TRANSPORTE DEL FUTURO? Jorge Martínez García COMPARATIVA Y 29 de junio de 2020 Tutores: ANÁLISIS DINÁMICO María Dolores Gómez Pulido Roberto Revilla Angulo Trabajo Final de Máster ESCUELA TÉCNICA SUPERIOR DE INGENIEROS DE CAMINOS, CANALES Y PUERTOS UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID Máster Universitario en Ingeniería de Caminos, Canales, y Puertos Hyperloop, ¿el transporte del futuro? Comparativa y análisis dinámico Contenido Índice de Tablas ............................................................................................................................. 4 Índice de Figuras ............................................................................................................................ 5 1 Resumen ................................................................................................................................ 7 2 Agradecimientos .................................................................................................................... 8 3 Introducción .......................................................................................................................... 9 4 Estado del arte ..................................................................................................................... 10 4.1 Sistema de propulsión y suspensión ............................................................................ 12 4.2 Velocidad ..................................................................................................................... 15 4.3 Tamaño del
    [Show full text]
  • Compulsator Design for Electromagnetic Railgun System
    COMPULSATOR DESIGN FOR ELECTROMAGNETIC RAILGUN SYSTEM By Bryan Bennett Senior Project Electrical Engineering Department Cal Poly State University, San Luis Obispo June, 2012 ABSTRACT This project designed, fabricated, and partially tested a compensated pulsed alternator (compulsator) to power an electromagnetic rail gun (EMRG) in a multidisciplinary team. The EMRG team includes two master’s AERO students, two senior EE students, and three senior ME students. Design of the compulsator began with research through conference and research papers. This design was changed throughout the project as system analysis and component testing exposed unforeseen system limitations. While original specifications were not met, all fabricated components but one, the stator, were completed using Cal Poly’s facilities and the project’s limited available budget. Experimental verification of calculations and system modeling were not obtained because the compulsator was fully assembled at the time of this writing, but the necessary measurements and testing procedures have been outlined. i TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………………i Table of Contents…………………………………………………………………………………ii List of Figures…………………………………………………………………………………….iii List of Tables……………………………………………………………………………………..iv Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………………….v Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………….1 Background………………………………………………………………………………………..3 Requirements……………………………………………………………………………………...6 Design……………………………………………………………………………………..………7 Total System Design……………………………………………………………...……….7
    [Show full text]
  • Tesla Files His Patents for the Electric Motor
    NUMBERS DON’T LIE_BY VACLAV SMIL OPINION corresponding lecture at the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, one of IEEE’s predecessor societies. However, it was Tesla, helped with generous financ- ing from U.S. investors, who designed not only the AC induction motors but also the requisite AC transformers and dis- tribution system. The two basic patents for his polyphase motor were granted 130 years ago this month. He filed some three dozen more by 1891. In a polyphase motor, each electromag- netic pole in the stator—the stationary housing—has multiple windings, each of which carries alternating current that’s out of phase with current in the other windings. The differing phases induce a current flow that turns the rotor. George Westinghouse acquired Tesla’s AC patents in July 1888. A year later Westinghouse Co. began selling the world’s first small electrical appliance, a fan powered by a 125-watt AC motor. Tesla’s first patent was for a two-phase MAY 1888: motor; modern households now rely on many small, single-phase electric TESLA FILES HIS PATENTS motors. The larger, more efficient three- phase machines are common in indus- trial applications. Mikhail Osipovich FOR THE ELECTRIC MOTOR Dolivo-Dobrovolsky, a Russian engi- neer working as the chief electrician for Germany’s AEG, built the first three- ELECTRICAL DEVICES ADVANCED by leaps and bounds in the 1880s, phase induction motor in 1889. which saw the first commercial generation in centralized power plants, Today, some 12 billion small, non- the first durable lightbulbs, the first transformers, and the first (limited) industrial motors are sold every year, urban grids.
    [Show full text]
  • DC Motor, How It Works?
    DC Motor, how it works? You can find DC motors in many portable home appliances, automobiles and types of industrial equipment. In this video we will logically understand the operation and construction of a commercial DC motor. The Working Let’s first start with the simplest DC motor possible. It looks like as shown in the Fig.1. The stator is a permanent magnet and provides a constant magnetic field. The armature, which is the rotating part, is a simple coil. Fig.1 A simplified D.C motor, which runs with permanent magnet The armature is connected to a DC power source through a pair of commutator rings. When the current flows through the coil an electromagnetic force is induced on it according to the Lorentz law, so the coil will start to rotate. The force induced due to the electromagnetic induction is shown using 'red arrows' in the Fig.2. Fig.2 The electromagnetic force induced on the coils make the armature coil rotate You will notice that as the coil rotates, the commutator rings connect with the power source of opposite polarity. As a result, on the left side of the coil the electricity will always flow ‘away ‘and on the right side , electricity will always flow ‘towards ‘. This ensures that the torque action is also in the same direction throughout the motion, so the coil will continue rotating. Fig.3 The commutator rings make sure a uni-directional current flows through the left and right part of the coil Improving the Torque action But if you observe the torque action on the coil closely, you will notice that, when the coil is nearly perpendicular to the magnetic flux, the torque action nears zero.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Stator Segmentation and Manufacturing Degradation on the Performance of IPM Machines, Using Icare Electrical Steels
    World Electric Vehicle Journal Vol. 8 - ISSN 2032-6653 - ©2016 WEVA Page WEVJ8-0450 EVS29 Symposium Montréal, Québec, Canada, June 19-22, 2016 Effect of stator segmentation and manufacturing degradation on the performance of IPM machines, using iCARe® electrical steels Jan Rens1, Sigrid Jacobs2, Lode Vandenbossche1, Emmanuel Attrazic3 1ArcelorMittal Global R&D Gent, J.Kennedylaan 3, 9060 Zelzate, Belgium 2(corresponding author) ArcelorMittal Global R&D, J. Kennedylaan 51, 9042 Gent, Belgium, [email protected] 3ArcelorMittal St Chély d’Apcher, Route du Fau de Peyre, 48200 St Chély d’Apcher, France Summary In order to increase the performance of permanent magnet electrical machines and/or reduce cost, improved manufacturing techniques are continuously being searched for by machine designers. Segmenting the stator core offers the possibility to simplify the winding process, to increase slot fill factor or to minimise wastage of electrical steel. This paper investigates some of the benefits that can be gained from stator segmentation, and highlights the effect of magnetic degradation due to the increased requirement on punching, through a series of finite element models. Keywords: Efficiency, motor design, power density, permanent magnet motor, materials 1 Introduction The design choice made for traction electrical machines has a significant influence on its final production cost and performance. With regards to the production of the stator core, recent publications have demonstrated the potential advantages of a segmented approach, where the stator core is assembled from a number of sub-stacks, as demonstrated in Figs 1 (a) to (d) [1-4]. The topology from Fig. 1(a) shows a segment comprising an entire tooth where adjacent segments are interconnected in the back-iron.
    [Show full text]
  • Brushless DC Motor Primer
    Brushless DC Motor Primer By Muhammad Mubeen [email protected] Last Revision: July, 2012 1 Foreword This primer on brushless DC motors has been written for the benefit of senior management executives of OEM companies in whose products, the electric motor is a major cost and feature component. The focus of this primer is permanent magnet brushless DC motors (BLDC), sometimes referred to as ECM (Electronically Commutated Motors). The material has been written from the stand point of top management. It has technical depth but is really meant to be used as a tool for senior management to get a quick and broad overview of the technology and the underlying pros and cons. It is my intent that the material presented will quickly make the reader well versed with the technology and give him or her a deep understanding of major impact of BLDC technology on their own competitiveness. Most important of all, the material is designed to point out ways in which the technology can be harnessed to advantage. Conversely, the material also points out the perils of ignoring these profound changes in the motor technology landscape. Muhammad Mubeen Radford, VA July, 2012 2 Overview of the Electric Motor Business in North America According to some estimates, the overall consumption of electric motors of all types in North America will be $18 Billion by 2007 up from $14 Billion in 2002 with an annual growth rate of 5%. The breakdown of this overall picture of consumption by motor technology looks as follows for 20071. 2007 Electric Motor Consumption in North America Total $18B All Other, $1.4, 8% AC Induction, $5.0, 28% BLDC, $4.1, 23% Brush DC, $7.4, 41% The consumption of electric motors is heavily influenced by the automotive industry and consumer applications.
    [Show full text]