Congressional Record—House H3552

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Congressional Record—House H3552 H3552 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE April 18, 2007 As a lame duck President and as (Ms. SOLIS addressed the House. Her as it is big enough.’’ And, Mr. Speaker, slave to his own failed foreign policy, remarks will appear hereafter in the at this very moment, this cataclysmic Congress must ensure that the Presi- Extensions of Remarks.) heartbreak continues. dent cannot unilaterally strike Iran in f Arthur Cohen, who is perhaps the the remaining months of his failed world’s leading scholar on the Euro- THE SCOURGE OF ABORTION IN presidency. Congress must pass legisla- pean Holocaust, used a Latin term to AMERICA tion that preserves the checks and bal- describe abortion in America. He called ances to guarantee that the President The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under it ‘‘mysterium tremendum,’’ which must listen to someone other than the the Speaker’s announced policy of Jan- means an utter mystery to the rational Vice President. uary 18, 2007, the gentleman from Ari- human mind, a mystery that carries zona (Mr. FRANKS) is recognized for 60 with it not only the aspect of vastness, b 2015 minutes as the designee of the minor- but the resonance of complete terror, America cannot afford to remain on a ity leader. something so unutterably diabolical as hair trigger until a new President Mr. FRANKS of Arizona. Mr. Speak- to be literally unknowable to us. takes the oath of office in January er, today was a very important day. Mr. Speaker, following the invasion 2009, but that is exactly what will hap- Today, the United States Supreme of Germany into Poland in 1939, a Jew- pen unless Congress steps up to ensure Court handed down a decision uphold- ish man named Yitzhak Katzenelson that the President stands down on a ing the Federal law protecting unborn was trapped by the Nazis in the Warsaw military strike against Iran. We must children from partial-birth abortion. ghetto. He was later transported to the take away his blank check. Mr. Speaker, perhaps it is important Auschwitz concentration camp, where for those of us in this Chamber to first f he and his son were brutally murdered. remind ourselves again of why we were Before his death, he buried under a The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a really all put here. Thomas Jefferson previous order of the House, the gen- tree a song that encapsulated the en- said, ‘‘The care of human life and its tire Nazi regime in one verse. He stated tleman from Texas (Mr. POE) is recog- happiness and not its destruction is the that, ‘‘The first to perish were the chil- nized for 5 minutes. chief and only object of good govern- (Mr. POE addressed the House. His dren. From these a new dawn might ment.’’ have arisen.’’ What a profound lesson remarks will appear hereafter in the Mr. Speaker, protecting the lives of for the rest of the world to hearken Extensions of Remarks.) our innocent citizens and their con- unto. A new dawn might have arisen stitutional rights is indeed why we are f from those children that perished in all here. The phrase in the 14th amend- The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a the Holocaust. ment capsulizes our entire Constitu- previous order of the House, the gen- No matter the rhetoric, Mr. Speaker, tion. It says, ‘‘No State shall deprive tleman from New Jersey (Mr. PALLONE) we must not ever be so blind to the fact any person of life, liberty or property is recognized for 5 minutes. that each time an abortion takes place, without due process of law.’’ The bed- (Mr. PALLONE addressed the House. a nameless little baby dies a lonely rock foundation of this Republic is the His remarks will appear hereafter in death; a mother is never quite the belief that all human beings are cre- the Extensions of Remarks.) same, whether she realizes it or not; ated equal and endowed by their Cre- f ator with the inalienable rights of life, and all of the gifts that that child The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a liberty and the pursuit of happiness. might have brought to humanity are previous order of the House, the gen- Every conflict and battle our Nation lost forever. tleman from Texas (Mr. PAUL) is recog- has ever faced can be traced to this It is often said, Mr. Speaker, that a nized for 5 minutes. core foundational belief on our part society is measured by how it treats (Mr. PAUL addressed the House. His that every life, from the smallest child those in the dawn of life, those in the remarks will appear hereafter in the to the elderly widow, from the strong- shadows of life, and those in the twi- Extensions of Remarks.) est and bravest soldiers on our front light of life. Because unborn children are hidden both in the dawn and in the f lines, to the weakest and most frail in our society, every human soul is of in- shadows of life, we kill thousands of The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a them every day in America, using previous order of the House, the gentle- finite worth and entitled by God to pursue liberty, prosperity and happi- sometimes methods like partial-birth woman from New York (Mrs. MCCAR- ness. abortion that cause so much agonizing THY) is recognized for 5 minutes. But, Mr. Speaker, for 34 years, Roe v. pain that the child that is being killed, (Mrs. MCCARTHY of New York ad- Wade has been a desecration of that if they were an animal, it would be ille- dressed the House. Her remarks will bedrock foundation upon which Amer- gal under Federal law to do it the way appear hereafter in the Extensions of ica stands, and Roe v. Wade sets itself we do it. Remarks.) apart from all of the other egregious If we, as a human family in America, f decisions made by our courts in that cannot find enough humanity within The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a its result is 45 million dead American ourselves to change that, if this human previous order of the House, the gen- children. rights atrocity of dismembering our tleman from Indiana (Mr. BURTON) is Mr. Speaker, that is 15,000 times the own children alive is truly who we are, recognized for 5 minutes. number of lives that were lost to ter- then the ‘‘invincible ignorance’’ Henry (Mr. BURTON of Indiana addressed rorism on September 11; and the land Hyde spoke of in this Chamber so long the House. His remarks will appear of the free and the home of the brave ago will indeed finally prevail, the pa- hereafter in the Extensions of Re- now stands awash in the blood of 45 triots’ dream will be lost, and those marks.) million of its own children. And it will lying out in Arlington National Ceme- tery will have died in vain and twilight f never cease to totally astound me how we, as Americans, fail to grasp the will have fallen upon us all. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a Mr. Speaker, that day may come in previous order of the House, the gen- enormous and terrifying threat to our Nation’s survival economically, mili- America indeed. But, sir, that day has tleman from Oregon (Mr. DEFAZIO) is not come yet. It is not this day, be- recognized for 5 minutes. tarily, morally and spiritually that this tragedy represents. cause today, Mr. Speaker, the world (Mr. DEFAZIO addressed the House. We have made it illegal to throw changed. Today the United States Su- His remarks will appear hereafter in away polystyrene diapers, while it re- preme Court upheld a law protecting the Extensions of Remarks.) mains for the last 34 years legal to unborn children from the barbaric, f throw away babies. How can we be so nightmarish procedure of partial-birth The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a blind to such a cataclysmic, soul- abortion. And with this ruling comes a previous order of the House, the gentle- crushing tragedy? brilliant, piercing ray of hope, because woman from California (Ms. SOLIS) is G.K. Chesterton said once that ‘‘Men even though this ruling only upholds a recognized for 5 minutes. can always be blind to a thing as long law that protects a small number of VerDate Aug 31 2005 04:18 Apr 19, 2007 Jkt 059060 PO 00000 Frm 00072 Fmt 7634 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\K18AP7.157 H18APPT1 hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMHOUSE April 18, 2007 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE H3553 late-term babies from this horrifying tions to restore protection to unborn b 2030 procedure called partial-birth abortion, children throughout the world. Mr. HENSARLING. I thank the gen- it represents the day that America Hope is a powerful thing, Mr. Speak- tleman for yielding. changed direction and turned her heart er. One of the most powerful messages Rarely do I rise with such trepidation toward home. of hope I ever saw in my life was cap- as I do tonight in trying to follow the I believe, Mr. Speaker, that this deci- tured in a picture I saw a few years powerful eloquence of my dear friend sion is part of a growing awareness on ago, and I cite the commentary that and colleague from Arizona (Mr. the part of all Americans of the simple accompanied it. It should be the pic- FRANKS). I want to thank him for the truth that abortion takes the life of a ture of the year, or perhaps the picture passion and clarity that he brings to child, and the United States of Amer- of the decade.
Recommended publications
  • Idaho Shows Strong Support for GNEP
    Idaho shows strong support for GNEP Support for Idaho as a potential site for the Department of Energy's Global Nuclear Photo: Idaho mayors Energy Partnership (GNEP) project was abundant at the March 15 Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) scoping meeting. Turnout was considerable. Approximately 650 people participated in the event, and 132 speakers shared their opinions. The number attending was roughly double in size of the next-largest GNEP scoping meeting prior to Idaho Falls. Widespread support for the project was clear with approximately 95% of the speakers advocating the development of GNEP in Idaho or at Idaho National Laboratory. Throughout the evening, numerous private citizens and representatives of Idaho civic and business organizations provided compelling reasons why DOE should choose INL to Idaho Falls Mayor Jared Fuhriman was surrounded participate in the project - including the lab's history, current mission and resources. by 16 other mayors from Idaho as he read a joint statement that favored a critical GNEP role for INL. Political luminaries lined up to support GNEP. Spokesmen for the entire Idaho political delegation - all of Idaho's U.S. senators and congressmen, the governor, lieutenant governor, the state legislature, as well as 16 mayors and commissioners from 10 counties - stood up to read letters of support into the meeting record. The standing-room-only crowd included dozens of community leaders from counties surrounding INL. Among the key political figures represented were Sen. Larry Craig, Sen. Mike Crapo, Rep. Mike Simpson, Rep. Bill Sali, Gov. Butch Otter and mayors from across the state who offered written appeals to DOE to include INL as a vital element of GNEP.
    [Show full text]
  • Election 2006
    APPENDIX: CANDIDATE PROFILES BY STATE We analyzed the fair trade positions of candidates in each race that the Cook Political Report categorized as in play. In the profiles below, race winners are denoted by a check mark. Winners who are fair traders are highlighted in blue text. Alabama – no competitive races___________________________________________ Alaska_________________________________________________________________ Governor OPEN SEAT – incumbent Frank Murkowski (R) lost in primary and was anti-fair trade. As senator, Murkowski had a 100% anti-fair trade voting record. 9 GOP Sarah Palin’s trade position is unknown. • Democratic challenger Tony Knowles is a fair trader. In 2004, Knowles ran against Lisa Murkowski for Senate and attacked her for voting for NAFTA-style trade deals while in the Senate, and for accepting campaign contributions from companies that off-shore jobs.1 Arizona________________________________________________________________ Senate: Incumbent GOP Sen. Jon Kyl. 9 Kyl is anti-fair trade. Has a 100% anti-fair trade record. • Jim Pederson (D) is a fair trader. Pederson came out attacking Kyl’s bad trade record in closing week of campaign, deciding to make off-shoring the closing issue. On Nov. 3 campaign statement: “Kyl has repeatedly voted for tax breaks for companies that ship jobs overseas, and he has voted against a measure that prohibited outsourcing of work done under federally funded contracts,” said Pederson spokesman Kevin Griffis, who added that Pederson “wants more protections [in trade pacts] related to child labor rules and environmental safeguards to help protect U.S. jobs.”2 House Arizona 1: GOP Rep. Rick Renzi incumbent 9 Renzi is anti-fair trade. 100% bad trade vote record.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Delegation
    CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION Boise Depot Tower Photo courtesy of: Boise Convention & Visitors Bureau CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION 39 Congressional Districts 40 IDAHO BLUE BOOK Congressional Qualifi cations Method of Offi cer Selection Qualifi cation Term of Offi ce United Elected by greatest 30 years of age, US Six years States number of votes in citizen for at least 9 Senator general election years and an Idaho resident United Elected by greatest 25 years of age, US Two years States number of votes in citizen for at least 7 Congressman general election years and an Idaho resident Article I of the U.S. Constitution states that Congress will consist of two separate houses. A lawmaking body with two houses is called a bicameral legislature. The two houses that make up the U.S. Congress are the House of Representatives and the Senate. Congress is the primary lawmaking body in the U.S. government. To solve problems, Members of Congress introduce legislative proposals called bills or resolutions. After considering these proposals, Members vote to adopt or to reject them. Members of Congress also review the work of executive agencies to determine if they are following government policy, and may introduce new legislation based on what they discover. Bills accepted by both houses of Congress and by the President become law. When the President vetoes a bill and returns it to Congress, Congress reviews the reasons for the rejection but may still act to pass the bill. The U.S. Constitution allows Congress to override the President’s veto with a two-thirds majority vote of both the House and the Senate.
    [Show full text]
  • Former Idaho Journalists
    Former Idaho Journalists Anderson, KTVB-TV (Boise, reporter) Bogus Basin ski area (communications) Gretchen Anthony, Bob KTVB-TV (Boise, weather) Department of Water Resources Arledge, Sharla KTVB-TV (Boise, managing editor) City of Nampa Baker, Karen Idaho Statesman (Boise, managing HealthWise (senior vice president) editor) Bard, Steve Idaho Statesman (Boise) Cypress Semiconductor (Boise) Micron Technology Student, Boise State University Beaman, Jeff KTVB-TV (Boise, reporter) Idaho Power Co. (communications) Boles, Jan Idaho Press Tribune (Nampa, chief Albertson College of Idaho (archivist) photographer) Bostwick, Bob* KBCI-TV (Boise, reporter) Coeur d’Alene Tribe Casino (communications) KID-TV (Idaho Falls, reporter) Brown, Janelle Idaho Statesman (Boise) Boise State University (communications) Browning, Mark KPVI-TV (Pocatello), KBCI-TV State Board of Education (communications) (Boise) Bugger, Brad Idaho State Journal (Pocatello, U.S. Department of Energy reporter) (communications) Bunch, Al** Idaho Statesman (Boise) State Insurance Fund (communications) Camp, Roya Idaho Statesman (Boise, city editor) HealthWise Campbell, Joe Morning News (Blackfoot, assistant CH2M-Hill WG Idaho (CWI), editor) (communications) Carnopis, Mark Idaho Statesman (Boise) Department of Corrections (communications) Valley Regional Transit (community relations) Cawley, Eric KIDK-TV (Idaho Falls, reporter) Idaho State Legislature (Communications) Lance for Atty General (Campaign Manager) Idaho Atty General’s Office (Communications) Ada County Assessor
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Government
    Federal Government US Capitol Building Photo courtesy of Architect of the Capitol Congressional Districts 46 IDAHO BLUE BOOK U.S. Congress Article I of the U.S. Constitution states agencies to determine if they are following that, “All legislative Powers herein granted government policy, and may introduce new shall be vested in a Congress of the United legislation based on what they discover. States, which shall consist of a Senate and a Bills accepted by both houses of Con- House of Representatives.” This bicameral gress and by the President become law. legislature (a governing body with two However, the President may veto a bill houses) is the primary lawmaking body in and return it to Congress. Congress then the U.S. government. To solve problems, reviews the reasons for the rejection but Federal Members of Congress introduce legislative may still act to pass the bill. The U.S. Con- proposals called bills or resolutions. After stitution allows Congress to override the considering these proposals Members vote President’s veto with a two-thirds majority to adopt or to reject them. Members of vote of both the House and the Senate. Congress also review the work of executive Members of Congress Members of the Senate and of the House elected for a period of six years, while of Representatives are known respectively representatives are elected for a period as senators and representatives. Each of two years. Furthermore, senators and Member of Congress is elected by representatives must meet the following receiving the greatest number of votes minimum requirements: in the general election.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Delegation
    CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION Blacks Creek Road overlooking the south fork of the Boise River. Photo courtesy of: Rachel “Annie” Cuellar CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION 37 Congressional Districts 38 IDAHO BLUE BOOK Congressional Qualifications Method of Officer Selection Qualification Term of Office United Elected by greatest 30 years of age, US Six years States number of votes in citizen for at least 9 Senator general election years and an Idaho resident United Elected by greatest 25 years of age, US Two years States number of votes in citizen for at least 7 Congressman general election years and an Idaho resident Article I of the U.S. Constitution states that Congress will consist of two separate houses. A lawmaking body with two houses is called a bicameral legislature. The two houses that make up the U.S. Congress are the House of Representatives and the Senate. Congress is the primary lawmaking body in the U.S. government. To solve problems, Members of Congress introduce legislative proposals called bills or resolutions. After considering these proposals, Members vote to adopt or to reject them. Members of Congress also review the work of executive agencies to determine if they are following government policy, and may introduce new legislation based on what they discover. Bills accepted by both houses of Congress and by the President become law. When the President vetoes a bill and returns it to Congress, Congress reviews the reasons for the rejection but may still act to pass the bill. The U.S. Constitution allows Congress to override the President’s veto with a two-thirds majority vote of both the House and the Senate.
    [Show full text]
  • From Macacas to Turban Toppers: the Rise in Xenophobic and Racist Rhetoric in American Political Discourse
    SOUTH ASIAN AMERICANS LEADING TOGETHER FROM MACACAS TO TURBAN TOPPERS: THE RISE IN XENOPHOBIC AND RACIST RHETORIC IN AMERICAN POLITICAL DISCOURSE OCTOBER 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 PART I COMMENTS AIMED GENERALLY AT SOUTH ASIAN, MUSLIM, SIKH, AND ARAB AMERICAN COMMUNITIES 4 PART II COMMENTS AIMED AT SOUTH ASIAN CANDIDATES FOR PUBLIC OFFICE 19 PART III TIPS FOR COMMUNITY MEMBERS RESPONDING TO XENOPHOBIC RHETORIC 22 TIMELINE OF KEY POST-SEPTEMBER 11TH DOMESTIC POLICIES AFFECTING 25 SOUTH ASIAN, MUSLIM, SIKH, AND ARAB AMERICAN COMMUNITIES ENDNOTES 28 FROM MACACAS TO TURBAN TOPPERS: THE RISE IN XENOPHOBIC AND RACIST RHETORIC IN AMERICAN POLITICAL DISCOURSE 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY research about such incidents only after that time, primarily Xenophobia and racism have no place in political and civic because of their unprecedented frequency as part of the discourse. Yet, a pattern of such rhetoric continues to exist in broader backlash against these communities. America’s political environment today. For decades, African Divided into three primary sections, the report touches upon Americans and Latinos have been subjected to racist rhetoric the following themes: (1) documented examples of in the political sphere. More recently, as this report shows, xenophobic rhetoric, aimed generally at South Asian, Muslim, South Asians, Muslims, Sikhs, and Arab Americans have been Sikh, or Arab American communities as a whole; the targets of such rhetoric by public officials and political (2) documented examples of such rhetoric aimed specifically candidates from both sides of the aisle. Even more alarming at South Asian candidates running for elected office; and (3) is the use of xenophobia and racism to stir negative responses tips for community members on how to respond to such against political candidates of South Asian descent.
    [Show full text]
  • NORMAL WINNERS: the STRATEGIES of STRONG CANDIDATES Ellen Gutman Galantucci a Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Unive
    NORMAL WINNERS:THE STRATEGIES OF STRONG CANDIDATES Ellen Gutman Galantucci A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Political Science. Chapel Hill 2015 Approved by: James A. Stimson John H. Aldrich Virginia H. Gray Michael B. MacKuen Jason M. Roberts c 2015 Ellen Gutman Galantucci ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT ELLEN GUTMAN GALANTUCCI: Normal Winners: The Strategies of Strong Candidates. (Under the direction of James A. Stimson) Much research has focused on what challengers do to win an election. Little research has been dedicated to exploring the behavior of candidates who are expected to win their elections. Candidates who find themselves in close races are likely to act differently than candidates in landslide elections because, as Kahn and Kenney (1997) suggest, voters eval- uate candidates differently based on the intensity of the election. What things do candidates who are expected to easily win their elections discuss? By content analyzing websites of candidates for the U.S. House, Senate, and state gov- ernorships from 2008, I find that candidates who are expected to win their elections are likely to act in ways that will not draw attention to the election. They are less likely to discuss controversial issues or mention their opponents than candidates in close races or those expected to lose. Alternatively, they focus on valence issues and constituent service. The same is true for their advertisements. Expected winners air fewer ads than candidates in competitive elections and the ones they do air tend to have less controversial content.
    [Show full text]
  • Senate State Affairs Committee
    Senate State Affairs Committee Minutes 2005 MINUTES SENATE STATE AFFAIRS COMMITTEE DATE: Friday, January 14, 2005 TIME: 8:00 a.m. PLACE: Room 437 MEMBERS Chairman Burtenshaw, Vice Chairman McKenzie, Senators Darrington, PRESENT: Davis, Stegner, Little, Stennett, Malepeai MEMBERS Geddes ABSENT/ EXCUSED: GUESTS: Clive Strong, Office of the Attorney General CONVENE: Chairman Burtenshaw called the meeting to order at 8:08 a.m. NEZ PERCE Presentation from Mr. Clive Strong, with the Attorney General's Office. AGREEMENT: Mr. Clive Strong, Division Chief of the Natural Resources Division for the Attorney General's Office, provided the committee with an unabridged version of the Nez Perce Water Rights Agreement as well as a short two-sided handout of the main points of the Agreement, which is attached to these minutes. Mr. Strong stated that this Agreement has a lot of support but added that it does not have unanimous support. The Agreement came about as a result of the Snake River Basin Adjudication. In 1987, the state commenced the SRBA to quantify all water right claims in the state of Idaho and to provide a comprehensive inventory of all the water rights. He explained that Idaho follows the prior appropriations doctrine. He stated that the federal Indian reserved water rights are an exception to state water law. Indian reserved water rights originated from the United States Supreme court case of Winters v. United States. This case involved the Fort Peck Reservation in Montana. Because all of the water supply had been fully appropriated under state law, there was insufficient water remaining to irrigate tribal lands.
    [Show full text]
  • Departing Members of the 109Th Congress
    DEPARTING MEMBERS OF THE 109TH CONGRESS RETIRING HOUSE MEMBERS REPLACED BY Michael Bilirakis (R-9th FL) Gus Bilirakis (R-9th FL) Jim Kolbe (R-8th AZ) Gabrielle Giffords (D-8th AZ) Bill Thomas (R-22nd CA) Kevin McCarthy (R-22nd CA) Joel Hefley (R-5th CO) Doug Lamborn (R-5th CO) Henry Hyde (R-6th IL) Peter Roskam (R-6th IL) Lane Evans (R-17th IL) Phil Hare (D-17th IL) Tom Osborne (R-3rd NE) Adrian Smith (R-3rd NE) Major Owens (D-11th NY) Yvette Clarke (D-11th NY) Sherwood Boehlert (R-24th NY) Michael Arcui (D-24th NY) Michael Oxley (R-4th OH) Jim Jordan (R-4th OH) Bill Jenkins (R-1st TN) David Davis (R-1st TN) Martin Sabo (D-5th MN) Keith Ellison (D-5th MN) RETIRING SENATE MEMBERS REPLACED BY Mark Dayton (D-MN) Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) Bill Frist (R-TN) Bob Corker (R-TN) Jim Jeffords (I-VT) Bernard Sanders (I-VT) Paul Sarbanes (D-MD) Ben Cardin (D-MD) DEFEATED HOUSE MEMBERS DEFEATED BY J.D. Hayworth (R-5th AZ) Harry Mitchell (R-5th AZ) Richard Pombo (R-11th CA) Jerry McNerney (D-11th CA) Nancy Johnson (R-5th CT) Chris Murphy (D-5th CT) Clay Shaw (R-22nd FL) Ron Klein (D-22nd FL) Chris Chocola (R-2nd IN) Joe Donnelly (D-2nd IN) John Hostettler (R-8th IN) Brad Ellsworth (D-8th IN) Mike Sodrel (R-9th IN) Baron Hill (D-9th IN) Jim Leach (R-2nd IA) Dave Loebsack (D-2nd IA) Jim Ryun (R-2nd KS) Nancy Boyda (D-2nd KS) Anne Northrup (R-3rd KY) John Yarmuth (D-3rd KY) Gil Gutkneckt (R-1st MN) Tim Walz (D-1st MN) Jeb Bradley (R-1ST NH) Carol Shea-Porter (D-1st NH) Charlie Bass (R-2nd NH) Paul Hodes (D-2nd NH) Sue Kelly (R-19th NY) John Hall (D-19th NY)
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Delegation
    CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION Diversion Dam Photo courtesy of: Deborah Courson Smith, Boise CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION 49 Congressional Districts 50 IDAHO BLUE BOOK Congressional Qualifi cations Method of Offi cer Selection Qualifi cation Term of Offi ce United Elected by greatest 30 years of age, US Six years States number of votes in citizen for at least 9 Senator general election years and an Idaho resident United Elected by greatest 25 years of age, US Two years States number of votes in citizen for at least 7 Congressman general election years and an Idaho resident Article I of the U.S. Constitution states that Congress will consist of two separate houses. A lawmaking body with two houses is called a bicameral legislature. The two houses that make up the U.S. Congress are the House of Representatives and the Senate. Congress is the primary lawmaking body in the U.S. government. To solve problems, Members of Congress introduce legislative proposals called bills or resolutions. After considering these proposals, Members vote to adopt or to reject them. Members of Congress also review the work of executive agencies to determine if they are following government policy, and may introduce new legislation based on what they discover. Bills accepted by both houses of Congress and by the President become law. When the President vetoes a bill and returns it to Congress, Congress reviews the reasons for the rejection but may still act to pass the bill. The U.S. Constitution allows Congress to override the President’s veto with a two-thirds majority vote of both the House and the Senate.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 110 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 110 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 154 WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 20, 2008 No. 177 House of Representatives The House met at 10 a.m. and was PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE House of January 4, 2007, the Chair an- called to order by the Speaker pro tem- The SPEAKER pro tempore. Will the nounces the Speaker’s reappointment pore (Mr. MCNULTY). gentleman from Ohio (Mr. LATTA) come of the following member on the part of the House to the United States-China f forward and lead the House in the Pledge of Allegiance. Economic and Security Review Com- DESIGNATION OF THE SPEAKER Mr. LATTA led the Pledge of Alle- mission, effective January 1, 2009: Mr. Michael Wessel, Falls Church, PRO TEMPORE giance as follows: Virginia. The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the f fore the House the following commu- United States of America, and to the Repub- nication from the Speaker: lic for which it stands, one nation under God, COMMUNICATION FROM THE HON- indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. WASHINGTON, DC, ORABLE RAY LAHOOD, MEMBER November 20, 2008. f OF CONGRESS I hereby appoint the Honorable MICHAEL R. MESSAGE FROM THE SENATE The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- MCNULTY to act as Speaker pro tempore on fore the House the following commu- this day. A message from the Senate by Ms. nication from the Honorable RAY NANCY PELOSI, Curtis, one of its clerks, announced LAHOOD, Member of Congress: Speaker of the House of Representatives.
    [Show full text]