CAMCOS Working Paper – Bio-Physical Environment
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Marine Fish Conservation Global Evidence for the Effects of Selected Interventions
Marine Fish Conservation Global evidence for the effects of selected interventions Natasha Taylor, Leo J. Clarke, Khatija Alliji, Chris Barrett, Rosslyn McIntyre, Rebecca0 K. Smith & William J. Sutherland CONSERVATION EVIDENCE SERIES SYNOPSES Marine Fish Conservation Global evidence for the effects of selected interventions Natasha Taylor, Leo J. Clarke, Khatija Alliji, Chris Barrett, Rosslyn McIntyre, Rebecca K. Smith and William J. Sutherland Conservation Evidence Series Synopses 1 Copyright © 2021 William J. Sutherland This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0). This license allows you to share, copy, distribute and transmit the work; to adapt the work and to make commercial use of the work providing attribution is made to the authors (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Attribution should include the following information: Taylor, N., Clarke, L.J., Alliji, K., Barrett, C., McIntyre, R., Smith, R.K., and Sutherland, W.J. (2021) Marine Fish Conservation: Global Evidence for the Effects of Selected Interventions. Synopses of Conservation Evidence Series. University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. Further details about CC BY licenses are available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Cover image: Circling fish in the waters of the Halmahera Sea (Pacific Ocean) off the Raja Ampat Islands, Indonesia, by Leslie Burkhalter. Digital material and resources associated with this synopsis are available at https://www.conservationevidence.com/ -
Citizens & Reef Science
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Report Editor: Jennifer Loder Report Authors and Contributors: Jennifer Loder, Terry Done, Alex Lea, Annie Bauer, Jodi Salmond, Jos Hill, Lionel Galway, Eva Kovacs, Jo Roberts, Melissa Walker, Shannon Mooney, Alena Pribyl, Marie-Lise Schläppy Science Advisory Team: Dr. Terry Done, Dr. Chris Roelfsema, Dr. Gregor Hodgson, Dr. Marie-Lise Schläppy, Jos Hill Graphic Designers: Manu Taboada, Tyler Hood, Alex Levonis This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence visit: http:// This project is supported by Reef Check creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Australia, through funding from the Australian Government. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to: Reef Check Foundation Ltd, PO Box 13204 George St Brisbane QLD 4003, Project achievements have been made [email protected] possible by a countless number of dedicated volunteers, collaborators, funders, advisors and industry champions. Citation: Thanks from us and our oceans. Volunteers, Staff and Supporters of Reef Check Australia (2015). Authors J. Loder, T. Done, A. Lea, A. Bauer, J. Salmond, J. Hill, L. Galway, E. Kovacs, J. Roberts, M. Walker, S. Mooney, A. Pribyl, M.L. Schläppy. Citizens & Reef Science: A Celebration of Reef Check Australia’s volunteer reef monitoring, education and conservation programs 2001- 2014. Reef Check Foundation Ltd. Cover photo credit: Undersea Explorer, GBR Photo by Matt Curnock (Russell Island, GBR) 3 Key messages FROM REEF CHECK AUSTRALIA 2001-2014 WELCOME AND THANKS • Reef monitoring is critical to understand • Across most RCA sites there was both human and natural impacts, as well evidence of reef health impacts. -
East Gippsland, Victoria
Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations. -
Matters of National Environmental Significance
NORTHEAST BUSINESS PARK Report on Matters of National Environmental Significance 16 January 2008 Job No. 7800-40 Northeast Business Park Pty Ltd NORTHEAST BUSINESS PARK REPORT ON MATTERS OF NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE Cardno (Qld) Pty Ltd ABN 57 051 074 992 5 Gardner Close Milton Q 4064 PO Box 388 Toowong Queensland 4066 Australia Telephone: 07 3369 9822 Facsimile: 07 3369 9722 International: +61 7 3369 9822 [email protected] www.cardno.com.au Document Control Author Reviewer Version Date Name Initials Name Initials Jeff Short 1 November 2007 JS / MC John Delaney KJD Dr Monica Campbell 2 16 January 2008 Dr Monica Campbell John Delaney "© 2008 Cardno (Qld) Pty Ltd All Rights Reserved. Copyright in the whole and every part of this document belongs to Cardno (Qld) Pty Ltd and may not be used, sold, transferred, copied or reproduced in whole or in part in any manner or form or in or on any media to any person without the prior written consent of Cardno (Qld) Pty Ltd.” Northeast Business Park Pty Ltd Version 2 16 January 2008 I:\7800-40\WP\Cardno Reports\Matters of NES\Matters of NES Final Draft_V2_16 Jan 2008\Matters of NES Final Draft_V2.docCommercial in Confidence Page i NORTHEAST BUSINESS PARK REPORT ON MATTERS OF NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE NORTHEAST BUSINESS PARK REPORT ON MATTERS OF NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................. 3 2. SITE DESCRIPTION.......................................................................................................... -
South East Queensland
YOUR FAMILY’S GUIDE TO EXPLORING OUR NATIONAL PARKS SOUTH EAST QUEENSLAND Featuring 78 walks ideal for children Contents A BUSH ADVENTURE A bush adventure with children . 1 Planning tips . 2 WITH CHILDREN As you walk . 4 Sometimes wonderful … As you stop and play . 6 look what can we As you rest, eat and contemplate . 8 This is I found! come again? Great short walks for family outings. 10 awesome! Sometimes more of a challenge … I'm tired/ i need are we hungry/bored the toilet nearly there? Whether the idea of taking your children out into nature fills you with a sense of excited anticipation or nervous dread, one thing is certain – today, more than ever, we are well aware of the benefits of childhood contact with nature: 1. Positive mental health outcomes; 2. Physical health benefits; 3. Enhanced intellectual development; and 4. A stronger sense of concern and care for the environment in later life. Planet Ark – Planting Trees: Just What the Doctor Ordered Above all, it can be fun! But let’s remember … Please don’t let your expectations of what should “If getting our kids out happen as you embark on a bush adventure into nature is a search for prevent you from truly experiencing and perfection, or is one more enjoying what does happen. Simply setting chore, then the belief in the intention to connect your children to a perfection and the chore natural place and discover it alongside defeats the joy.” 2nd Edition - 2017 them is enough. We invite you to enjoy Produced & published by the National Parks Association of Queensland Inc. -
Laboratory Evaluation of the Predation Efficacy of Native Australian Fish on Culex Annulirostris (Diptera: Culicidae)
Journal of the Americctn Mosquito Control Association, 20(3):2g6_291,2OO4 Copyright A 2OO4by the American Mosquib Control Association, Inc. LABORATORY EVALUATION OF THE PREDATION EFFICACY OF NATIVE AUSTRALIAN FISH ON CULEX ANNULIROSTRIS (DIPTERA: CULICIDAE) TIMOTHY P HURST, MICHAEL D. BRowNI eNo BRIAN H. KAY Australian Centre International for and Tropical Health and Nutrition at the eueensland Institute of Medical pO Research, Royal Brisbane H<tspital, eueensland 4029, Austalia ABSTRACT. The introduction and establishment of fish populations can provide long-term, cost-effective mosquito control in habitats such as constructed wetlands and ornamental lakes. The p.idution efficacy of 7 native Brisbane freshwater fish on I st and 4th instars of the freshwater arbovirus vector culex annulirostris was evaluated in a series of 24-h laboratory trials. The trials were conducted in 30-liter plastic carboys at 25 + l"C urder a light:dark cycle of l4:10 h. The predation eflcacy of native crimson-spotted rainbowfish Melanotaenia (Melanotaeniidae), cluboulayi Australian smelt Retropinna semoni (Retropinnadae), pacific blue-eye pseudomugil (Atherinidae), signfer fly-specked hardyhead Craterocephalus stercusmLtscarum (Atherinidae), hretail gudgeon Hypseleotris gttlii (Eleotridae), empire gudgeon Hypseleotris compressa (Eleotridae), and estuary percilet Am- bassis marianus (Ambassidae) was compared with the exotic eaitern mosquitofish Getmbusia iolbrooki (poe- ciliidae). This environmentally damaging exotic has been disseminated worldwide and has been declared noxrous in Queensland. Melanotaenia duboulayi was found to consume the greatest numbers of both lst and 4th instars of Cx. annuliro.t/ri.t. The predation efficacy of the remaining Australian native species was comparable with that of the exotic G. holbrooki. With the exception of A- marianu^s, the maximum predation rates of these native species were not statistically different whether tested individually or in a school of 6. -
Original Article Seascape Context Modifies How Fish Respond to Restored Oyster Reef Structures
ICES Journal of Marine Science (2019), 76(4), 1131–1139. doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsz019 Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/icesjms/article-abstract/76/4/1131/5333156 by Griffith University user on 02 September 2019 Original Article Seascape context modifies how fish respond to restored oyster reef structures Ben L. Gilby 1,2*, Andrew D. Olds1,2, Christopher J. Henderson1,2, Nicholas L. Ortodossi1, Rod M. Connolly3, and Thomas A. Schlacher1,2 1The Animal Research Centre, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore DC, Queensland 4558, Australia 2School of Science and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore DC, Queensland, 4558, Australia 3Australian Rivers Institute—Coasts and Estuaries, School of Environment and Science, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland 4222, Australia *Corresponding author: tel: +61 7 5430 2891; e-mail: [email protected]. Gilby, B. L., Olds, A. D., Henderson, C. J., Ortodossi, N. L., Connolly, R. M., and Schlacher, T. A. Seascape context modifies how fish re- spond to restored oyster reef structures. – ICES Journal of Marine Science, 76: 1131–1139. Received 14 October 2018; revised 13 January 2019; accepted 24 January 2019; advance access publication 18 February 2019. The seascape context of coastal ecosystems plays a pivotal role in shaping patterns in fish recruitment, abundance, and diversity. It might also be a principal determinant in structuring the recruitment of fish assemblages to restored habitats, but the trajectories of these relationships require further testing. In this study, we surveyed fish assemblages from 14 restored oyster reefs and 14 control sites in the Noosa River, Queensland, Australia, that differed in the presence or absence of seagrass within 500 m, over four periods using baited cameras. -
Landsborough to Nambour Rail Corridor Study (The Study) ERRSYRGIH%TVMP Is an Early Component of the Project
Landsborough to Nambour Rail Project )RZMVSRQIRXEP-QTEGX7XEXIQIRX )\IGYXMZI7YQQEV] .YP] 0ERHWFSVSYKLXS2EQFSYV4VIJIVVIH6SYXI 1SSPSSPEL 4EPQ[SSHW 2EQFSYV )YHPS 0ERHWFSVSYKL ;SSQF]I Preferred route Existing North Coast Line Whilst every care has been taken to ensure the accuracy of this data, the Department of Transport and Main Roads makes no representations or warranties about its accuracy, reliability, completeness or suitability for any particular Copyright Brisway Publishing 2007. Reproduced from Brisway with permission. purpose and disclaims all responsibility and all liability (including without limitation, liability in negligence) and costs Note: Map not to scale. which might be incurred as a result of the plan being inaccurate or incomplete in any way and for any reason. Figure 1: Project Features Fi 1 P j t F t 'SRXIRXW 1. Introduction 1 12. Nature conservation: Terrestrial fauna 38 2. Project description 10 13. Aquatic biology 41 3. Land use and infrastructure 12 14. Water resources 44 4. Land: Topography 16 15. Noise and vibration 46 5. Land: Geology and soils 18 16. Air quality 49 6. Landscape character and visual amenity 20 17. Climate and natural disasters 52 7. Transport 23 18. Waste 54 8. Economic environment 28 19. Hazard and risk 56 9. Social environment 30 20. Cumulative impacts 59 10. Cultural heritage 32 21. Special management areas 61 11. Nature conservation: Terrestrial flora 35 22. Environmental management plans 76 0MQMXEXMSRWSJXLMWHSGYQIRX (EXEERHXIGLRMGEPMRZIWXMKEXMSRW The environmental impact statement has been prepared by Arup The investigations documented in the environmental impact solely for the Department of Transport and Main Roads, in statement have been undertaken in accordance with the response to the Terms of Reference prepared by the Queensland requirements of the Terms of Reference where appropriate. -
Report on the Administration of the Nature Conservation Act 1992 (Reporting Period 1 July 2019 to 30 June 2020)
Report on the administration of the Nature Conservation Act 1992 (reporting period 1 July 2019 to 30 June 2020) Prepared by: Department of Environment and Science © State of Queensland, 2020. The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia (CC BY) licence. Under this licence you are free, without having to seek our permission, to use this publication in accordance with the licence terms. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. For more information on this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en Disclaimer This document has been prepared with all due diligence and care, based on the best available information at the time of publication. The department holds no responsibility for any errors or omissions within this document. Any decisions made by other parties based on this document are solely the responsibility of those parties. If you need to access this document in a language other than English, please call the Translating and Interpreting Service (TIS National) on 131 450 and ask them to telephone Library Services on +61 7 3170 5470. This publication can be made available in an alternative format (e.g. large print or audiotape) on request for people with vision impairment; phone +61 7 3170 5470 or email <[email protected]>. September 2020 Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Nature Conservation Act 1992—departmental administrative responsibilities ............................................................. 1 List of legislation and subordinate legislation .............................................................................................................. -
Published on DES Disclosure Log RTI Act 2009
Offence start 'tblStatus'[Status] Offence Location OffenceCode Description of Offence Section Legislation Penalty date Warning Notice 11/06/09 AMITY BANK TOWARD MAROOM BANK MB72 Unlawful operation of vessel in a go slow area (turtle and dugong) s45(1) Marine Parks (Moreton Bay) Zoning Plan 2008 $0. Referred to SPER 07/11/09 Waters of Nundah Creek (MN913) M086 Unlawfully enter/use Marine Park (taking natural or cultural resources) s109(1) Marine Parks Regulation 2006 $500. Paid in Full 14/11/09 Marine national park zone #MNP08 M086 Unlawfully enter/use Marine Park (taking natural or cultural resources) s109(1) Marine Parks Regulation 2006 $500. Referred to SPER 01/12/09 Waters of Salwater Creek MNP11 M086 Unlawfully enter/use Marine Park (taking natural or cultural resources) s109(1) Marine Parks Regulation 2006 $500. Paid in Full 23/12/09 Marine Park Green zone North East of Rodney Point Fraser Island M086 Unlawfully enter/use Marine Park (taking natural or cultural resources) s109(1) Marine Parks Regulation 2006 $500. Paid in Full 30/12/09 Tripcony Bight Marine National Park 02 - 26571155 - 15303131 E M086 Unlawfully enter/use Marine Park (taking natural or cultural resources) s109(1) Marine Parks Regulation 2006 $500. Paid in Full 31/12/09 Tripcony Bight MNPZ02 M086 Unlawfully enter/use Marine Park (taking natural or cultural resources) s109(1) Marine Parks Regulation 2006 $500. Withdrawn 31/12/09 Tripcony Bight MNPZ02 M086 Unlawfully enter/use Marine Park (taking natural or cultural resources) s109(1) Marine Parks Regulation 2006 $500. Debt Finalised with SPER 01/01/10 Tripcony Bight Marine National Park 02/52656760- E15304872 M086 Unlawfully enter/use Marine Park (taking natural or cultural resources) s109(1) Marine Parks Regulation 2006 $500. -
2014 Update of the SEQ NRM Plan: Redlands
Item: Redlands Draft LG Report Date: Last updated 11th November 2014 2014 Update of the SEQ NRM Plan: Redlands How can the SEQ NRM Plan support the Community’s Vision for the future of Redlands? Supporting Document no. 7 for the 2014 Update of the SEQ Natural Resource Management Plan. Note regards State Government Planning Policy: The Queensland Government is currently undertaking a review of the SEQ Regional Plan 2009. Whilst this review has yet to be finalised, the government has made it clear that the “new generation” statutory regional plans focus on the particular State Planning Policy issues that require a regionally-specific policy direction for each region. This quite focused approach to statutory regional plans compares to the broader content in previous (and the current) SEQ Regional Plan. The SEQ Natural Resource Management Plan has therefore been prepared to be consistent with the State Planning Policy. Disclaimer: This information or data is provided by SEQ Catchments Limited on behalf of the Project Reference Group for the 2014 Update of the SEQ NRM Plan. You should seek specific or appropriate advice in relation to this information or data before taking any action based on its contents. So far as permitted by law, SEQ Catchments Limited makes no warranty in relation to this information or data. ii Table of Contents Redlands, Bay and Islands ....................................................................................................................... 1 Part A - Achieving the community’s visions for Redlands .................................................................... 1 Queensland Plan – South East Queensland Themes .......................................................................... 1 Regional Development Australia - Logan and Redlands ..................................................................... 1 Services needed from natural assets to achieve these Visions .......................................................... 2 Natural Assets depend on the biodiversity of the Redlands. -
Submission Re Proposed Cooloola World Heritage Area Boundary
Nearshore Marine Biodiversity of the Sunshine Coast, South-East Queensland: Inventory of molluscs, corals and fishes July 2010 Photo courtesy Ian Banks Baseline Survey Report to the Noosa Integrated Catchment Association, September 2010 Lyndon DeVantier, David Williamson and Richard Willan Executive Summary Nearshore reef-associated fauna were surveyed at 14 sites at seven locations on the Sunshine Coast in July 2010. The sites were located offshore from Noosa in the north to Caloundra in the south. The species composition and abundance of corals and fishes and ecological condition of the sites were recorded using standard methods of rapid ecological assessment. A comprehensive list of molluscs was compiled from personal observations, the published literature, verifiable unpublished reports, and photographs. Photographic records of other conspicuous macro-fauna, including turtles, sponges, echinoderms and crustaceans, were also made anecdotally. The results of the survey are briefly summarized below. 1. Totals of 105 species of reef-building corals, 222 species of fish and 835 species of molluscs were compiled. Thirty-nine genera of soft corals, sea fans, anemones and corallimorpharians were also recorded. An additional 17 reef- building coral species have been reported from the Sunshine Coast in previous publications and one additional species was identified from a photo collection. 2. Of the 835 mollusc species listed, 710 species could be assigned specific names. Some of those not assigned specific status are new to science, not yet formally described. 3. Almost 10 % (81 species) of the molluscan fauna are considered endemic to the broader bioregion, their known distribution ranges restricted to the temperate/tropical overlap section of the eastern Australian coast (Central Eastern Shelf Transition).