DOCSLIB.ORG

Monographs 1 (1986) — — 47 Geesinkorchis De 43* Coelogyne Lindley 19, 23, 24,43, Vogel 17

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Monographs 1 (1986) — — 47 Geesinkorchis De 43* Coelogyne Lindley 19, 23, 24,43, Vogel 17 Index cases code) from numbers The hyphen separates the names of taxa at the left side (in most followed by a and the side. Names of followed code of letters of pages, figures plates at right accepted species are by a with their in this A B: Ch: and numbers corresponding sequence paper. means Acriopsis, Bracisepalum, Chelonistele, E: Entomophobia, G: Geesinkorchis, and N: Nabaluia. Synonyms are followed by '='and An 'Excl.' excluded - subsequently by the code of the species to which they belong. refers to species. asterisk indicates the where the is 'fig.' refers to a line-drawing; to a coloured page taxon described; 'plate' Two unnumbered with their number. plate. maps are given page Acriopsidinae Dressier — 1 Chelonanthera Blume - 23, 24 Acriopsis Reinw. ex Blume - 1, 2, 3*, 4 map clypeata (Lindley) Pfitzer - 23 = — annamensis Guill. ?A5c 16 gibbosa Blume - 23 = — = annamica Finet ?A5c 15, 16 sulphurea Blume ChlOa - 23, 37 = - borneensis Ridley A2b 7 ventricosa Blume - 23 carrii Holttum A1 - 2, 3, 5*, fig. 2 Chelonistele Pfitzer - 17, 23, 24*, 25 map, 43, 47 densiflora Lindley A2 — 2, 3, 5, 6*, 7 amplissima (Ames & Schweinf.) Carr Chi - var. borneensis (Ridley) Minderhoud & 26*, fig. 10, plate 2d de Vogel A2b - 6, 7*, fig. 3f-g apiculata (Lindley) Pfitzer Excl. — 23, 40 var. densiflora A2a — 6*, fig. 3a-e biflora (Par. & Rchb. f.) Pfitzer Excl. - 23, 40 = floribunda Ames A5b - 13 brevilamellata (J.J. Smith) Carr Ch2 - 24, 26, gracilis Minderhoud & de Vogel A3 — 1, 3, 5, 28*, fig. 11 = 7*, fig. 4, plate la clemensii (Ames) Carr N2 - 47, 49 = = griffithii Rchb. f. A5a - 11 crassifolia Carr Chi Ob — 39 = = harai Tuyama ?A5a — 12, 13 cuneata (J.J. Smith) Carr ChlOa - 38, 39 - indica Wight A4 3, 5, 8*, fig. 5, plate lb dentifera de Vogel Ch3 - 26, 29*, fig. 12 = insulari-sylvatica Fukuyama ?A5a - 12, 13 ingloria (J.J.Smith) Carr Ch4 - 18, 26, 30*, javanica Reinw. ex Blume A5 — 3,5,9*, 13,15, fig. 13, plate 3a = 16 keithiana W.W. Smith N2 - 40, 47, 49 var. auriculata Minderhoud & de Vogel kinabaluensis (Rolfe) de Vogel Ch5 — 26, 31*, A5c - 1, 3, 10, 14*, 16, fig. 6 fig. 14 = var. floribunda (Ames) Minderhoud & de kutaiensis (J.J. Smith) Carr ChlOa — 38, 39 Vogel A5b - 10, 13*, fig. ld-e (p. 11) lamellulifera Carr Ch6 — 26, 32*, 47, fig. 15 var. javanica A5a — 3, 10*, 13, fig. la—c, lurida (L. Linden & Cogn.) Pfitzer Ch7 - 26, f-h (p. 11), plate lc, Id 33* = var. nelsoniana (Bailey) J.J. Smith A5a - 11 var. grandiflora de Vogel Ch7b - 34*, fig. = javanica (non Reinw. ex Bl.) Blume A5c — 14 16j-k, plate 3c = - javanica (non Reinw. ex Bl.) Schltr. A5b - 13 var. lurida Ch7a 34*, fig. 16a-i, plate 3b — = latifolia Rolfe Excl. 16 perakensis (Rolfe) Ridley ChlOa - 23,38,39, = nelsoniana Bailey A5a — 11 43 = = var. pallidifloraSchltr. A5a - 12 pinniloba (J.J. Smith) Carr Chl0a-38, 39 = - = papuana Kraenzlin A5a 12 pusilla (Ridley) Ridley ChlOa - 37, 39 = — philippinensis Ames A5a 12 ramentacea J.J.Wood Ch8 - 26, 35*, fig. 17 = ?A5a - picta Lindley 11 richardsii Cart Ch9 - 26, 35*, fig. 18 = - purpurea Ridley A2a 7 sulphurea (Blume) Pfitzer ChlO - 24, 36*, 43 - ridleyi Hooker f. A6 2, 3, 5, 15*, fig. 7, plate var. crassifolia (Carr) de Vogel Chi0b - 18, 2a, 2b 26, 39*, fig. 19e-g, fig. 20e = sumatrana Schltr. ?A5a -11,13 var. sulphurea ChlOa — 18, 26, 37*, fig. 19a-d, fig. 20a-d, f, g, plate 3d, Basigyne J.J. Smith - 19 cover Smith — Bracisepalum J.J. 17, 19* tenuiflora (Ridley) Pfitzer Excl. - 40 densiflorum de Vogel Bl - 19, 20*, fig. 8, unguiculata Carr Chll - 26, 39*, fig. 21 plate 2c vermicularis (J.J. Smith) Kraenzlin Excl. — 40 selebicum J.J.Smith B2 — 18, 19, 20*, fig. 9 Chelonostele auct. non Pfitzer: Ridley - 43, 44 52 Orchid Monographs 1 (1986) — — 47 Geesinkorchis de 43* Coelogyne Lindley 19, 23, 24,43, Vogel 17, - - 44*, 23, sect. Chelonistele J.J. Smith 23, 24 alaticallosa de Vogel G1 43, fig. sect. Longifoliae Pfitzer - 43 plate 4a, 4b G2 — subgen. Chelonistele (Pfitzer) Butzin - 24 phaiostele (Ridley) de Vogel 18, 40, 43, - 4c amplissima Ames & Schweinf. Chi — 26, 28 44, 45*, fig. 24, plate var. schweinfurthiana J.J. Smith = Chi — Nabaluia Ames — 47* 26, 28 17, 23, 43, - 39 de N1 — 49, fig. 25, beyrodtianaSchltr. = ChlOa 23, 38, angustifolia Vogel 47, 48*, biflora Par. & Rchb. f. — 23 plate 4d - 26 bilamellata Lindley - 47 clemensii Ames N2 40,47,48, 49*, fig. - = non Ames 48 brevilamellata J.J. Smith Ch2 — 23, 28 clemensii auct. Ames: = de - 27 crassifolia (Carr) Masamune ChlOb - 39 exaltata Vogel N3 48, 50*, fig. = croockewitii Teysm. & Binnend. ChlOa — — 23 23,38,39 Panisea Lindley = - 23 cuneata J.J. Smith ChlOa — 38 apiculata Lindley = - 40 decipiens Sander ?Chl0a - 38 uniflora (Lindley) Lindley - 47 gibbosa(Blume) Rchb. f. — 23 Pholidota W.J. Hooker 17, 23, 41,43, = de Vriese - 43 ingloria J.J. Smith Ch4 — 30 gibbosa (Blume) = J. Hooker — 43 kutaiensis J.J. Smith ChlOa - 38 imbricata W. = = - kinabaluensis Ames El - 41 lamellulifera (Carr) Masamune Ch6 32 — = - Rchb. f. 47 lurida L. Linden & Cogn. Ch7 23, 34 nervosa (Blume) 41, 43, = - 38 = perakensis Rolfe ChlOa - 23, 38 pusilla (Ridley) Kraenzlin ChlOa = Smith Ch5 - 31 = phaiostele G2 - 43,45 sigmatochilus(Rolfe) J.J. = - pinnilobaJ.J. Smith ChlOa — 38 sulcata J.J. Smith 43 = = - pusilla Ridley ChlOa - 23, 37 triloba J.J. Smith G2 45 = - 43 richardsii (Carr) Masamune Ch9 - 35 ventricosa (Blume) Rchb. f. — 23 = ridleyana Schltr. G2 — 43,45 Pleione D. Don = = & O. Kuntze sarawakensis Schltr. Ch7a - 34 croockewitii (Teysm. Binnend.) = - ChlOa - 38 sulphurea (Blume) Rchb. f. ChlOa 23, 37 23, = O. Kuntze ChlOa — 37 tenuiflora Ridley - 23 sulphurea (Blume) 23, = unguiculata(Carr) Masamune Chll — 39 - - Rolfe 24 ventricosa (Blume) Rchb. f. 23 Sigmatochilus = kinabaluensis Rolfe Ch5 — 31 Cymbidieae — 1 24, = - Cyrtopodiinae — 1, 2 Spathoglottis ?trivalvis Lindley A5a 11 Dendrochilum Blume - 19 Thecopus —1,2 Thecostele — 1,2 — Entomophobia de Vogel - 17, 41* alata (Roxb.) Par. & Rchb. f. 16 kinabaluensis (Ames) de Vogel El - 41*, Thecostelinae -1,2 fig. 22 - Epidendreae — 1 Vandeae 1 — Epidendroideae - 1 Vandoideae 1 Orchid Monographs 1 (1986) 53 Legends of the figures For Fig. 1, see page 11. Holttum. b. flower d. and column Fig. 2. Acriopsis carrii a. Habit; flower; c. analysis; lip (a. Carr 135; b-d. SF 10254). flower Fig. 3. Acriopsis densiflora Iindley var. densiflora. a. Habit; b. flower; c. analysis; d. lip and column; e. lip. — Acriopsis densiflora Lindley var. bomeensis (Ridley) Minderhoud& de f. Habit; and column Niel b-d. Herb. Paris e. van der Est Vogel. g. lip (a. van 3718, s.n.; s.n.; f-g. Collenette 29/79). Fig. 4. Acriopsis gracilis Minderhoud & de Vogel. a. Flower; b. flower analysis; c. lip and column (a—d. Giles 620). indica b. flower column Fig. 5. Acriopsis Wight, a. Habit; analysis; c. flower; d. lip and Weber b—d. Seidenfaden& Smitinand (a. s.n.; 8345). Blume auriculata Minderhoud de Fig. 6. Acriopsis javanica Reinw. ex var. & Vogel. a. Habit; b. flower; c. flower analysis; d. lip and column; e. cross-section through lip and column (a—d. Leiden, cult. Hort. (Roos & Franken) 20788; e. Mason 546). Fig. 7. Acriopsis ridleyi Hooker f. a. Habit; b. flower; c. flower analysis; d. lip and column; e. fruit (a. Burkill 3331;b-e. Bridson 353). Fig. 8. Bracisepalum densiflorum de Vogel. a. Habit; b. bract; c. flower; d. flower analysis; e. lip and column; f. column (a—f. Leiden, cult. Hort. (de Vogel) 20313). Smith, flower Fig. 9. Bracisepalum selebicum J.J. a. Habit; b. bract; c. flower; d. analysis; e. lip and column; f. colum (a—f. Leiden, cult. Hort. (de Vogel) 20446). flower Fig. 10. Chelonisteleamplissima (Ames & Schweinf.) Carr. a. Habit; b. flower; c. anal- outline Chai ysis; d. column; e. cross-section through ovary (a. & c—e. Nooteboom& 2247; b. Singapore, cult. Hort. 11.111.66 (Kew ale. 31926)). Fig. 11. Chelonistele brevilamellata(J.J. Smith) Carr. a. Habit; b. flower analysis; c. backside of the lip; d. column (a—d. Endert 4427). Fig. 12. Chelonistele dentifera de Vogel. a. Habit; b. flower analysis; c. lip and column; d. column; e. lip (a. & c—e. S 21954; b. Burtt B. 11375). Carr. b. flower d. col- Fig. 13. Chelonistele ingloria (J.J.Smith) a. Habit; flower; c. analysis; cult. Hort. Martin umn (a. & c-d. Endert 3972; b. Leiden, (Burtt & 5215) 22064). de b. flower Fig. 14. Chelonistele kinabaluensis (Rolfe) Vogel. a. Habit; flower; c. analysis; the lobes Clemens e—f. Clemens d. lip and column; e. column; f. column, spread (a—d. 51192; 50658). Carr. flower d. col- Fig. 15. Chelonistele lamellulifera a. Habit; b. flower; c. analysis; lip; e. umn,left lobes spread (a. & d. Synge S. 521; b-c. & e. Burtt & Martin B. 5405). 54 Orchid Monographs 1 (1986) Fig. 2. Holttum. 55 Orchid Monographs 1 (1986) 16. Chelonistele lurida Linden & Pfltzer Fig. (L. Cogn.) var. lurida. a. Habit; b. flower; c. flower analysis; d. column, lobes spread; e. anther; f. pollinia; g. flower analysis; h. lip and column; i. column, lobes spread. — Chelonistele lurida var. grandiflora de Vogel. j. Flower analysis; k. column, lobes spread (a. Clemens s.n., 7-1-1932; b-f. SAN (Sinanggul) 38318; g—i. Bruxelles, cult. Hort. (Herb. Cogniaux); j-k. Burtt & Woods B. 2169). Fig. 17. Chelonistele ramentacea J.J.Wood, a. Habit; b. flower analysis; c. column (a—c. Burtt & Woods B. 2192). Fig. 18. Chelonistele richardsii Carr. a. Habit; b. flower; c. flower analysis; d. lip and column; Richards e. column, lobes spread (a-e.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (Acriopsidinae, Orchidaceae) Latter, Acriopsis Only Genus
    A taxonomic revision of the genus Acriopsis Reinwardt ex Blume (Acriopsidinae, Orchidaceae) M.E. Minderhoud & E.F. de Vogel Rijksheibaiium, Leiden, The Netherlands Drawings by J. J. Vermeulen Summary taxonomic revision of the 5 One This article presents a genus Acriopsis (6 species, varieties). species to (A. gracilis) and one variety (A. javanica var. auriculata) are described as new. Two species are reduced reduced to variety level ((A. javanica var. floribunda, A. densiflora var. bomeensis). Twelve names are synonymy. Introduction Several opinions have been expresssed on the position of the genus Acriopsis within the Orchidaceae. According to Schlechter (1915) Acriopsis belongs to the Vandeae tribe. For this and Thecostele he the Thecostelinae. The the subtribe containing genus proposed name for Schlechter these because of the of main reason to place two genera together was presence tubular formed the adnation of the base of the the base of the a unique structure, by hp to column. In Acriopsis the hp is adnate to the column itself, no column foot is present. In front. Thecostele, however, it is adnate to an outgrowth of the column which projects to the Many authors followedthe classification by Schlechter, with Acriopsis closely alliedto Theco- stele. Holttum (1953) also kept both genera together, but named the tribe 'Acriopsis tribe'. with the Dressier & Dodson (1960) placed Acriopsis a questionmark in tribe Epidendreae of the Vandoid and Epidendroid orchids. They stressed that it may deserve a separate sub- tribe and that it is not related to Thecostele which was placed by them in the monotypic subtribe Thecostelinae. subfamilies. Dressier (1981) treated the Epidendroideae and the Vandoideae as separate classified the the Within the latter, Acriopsis is as only genus in subtribe 'Acriopsidinae', which he described as new, in juxtaposition to the monotypic subtribe Thecostelinae, both in the Cymbidieae.
    [Show full text]
  • Phytogeographic Review of Vietnam and Adjacent Areas of Eastern Indochina L
    KOMAROVIA (2003) 3: 1–83 Saint Petersburg Phytogeographic review of Vietnam and adjacent areas of Eastern Indochina L. V. Averyanov, Phan Ke Loc, Nguyen Tien Hiep, D. K. Harder Leonid V. Averyanov, Herbarium, Komarov Botanical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Prof. Popov str. 2, Saint Petersburg 197376, Russia E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Phan Ke Loc, Department of Botany, Viet Nam National University, Hanoi, Viet Nam. E-mail: [email protected] Nguyen Tien Hiep, Institute of Ecology and Biological Resources of the National Centre for Natural Sciences and Technology of Viet Nam, Nghia Do, Cau Giay, Hanoi, Viet Nam. E-mail: [email protected] Dan K. Harder, Arboretum, University of California Santa Cruz, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, California 95064, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] The main phytogeographic regions within the eastern part of the Indochinese Peninsula are delimited on the basis of analysis of recent literature on geology, geomorphology and climatology of the region, as well as numerous recent literature information on phytogeography, flora and vegetation. The following six phytogeographic regions (at the rank of floristic province) are distinguished and outlined within eastern Indochina: Sikang-Yunnan Province, South Chinese Province, North Indochinese Province, Central Annamese Province, South Annamese Province and South Indochinese Province. Short descriptions of these floristic units are given along with analysis of their floristic relationships. Special floristic analysis and consideration are given to the Orchidaceae as the largest well-studied representative of the Indochinese flora. 1. Background The Socialist Republic of Vietnam, comprising the largest area in the eastern part of the Indochinese Peninsula, is situated along the southeastern margin of the Peninsula.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of CITES Appendices I and II Plant Species from Lao PDR
    A Review of CITES Appendices I and II Plant Species From Lao PDR A report for IUCN Lao PDR by Philip Thomas, Mark Newman Bouakhaykhone Svengsuksa & Sounthone Ketphanh June 2006 A Review of CITES Appendices I and II Plant Species From Lao PDR A report for IUCN Lao PDR by Philip Thomas1 Dr Mark Newman1 Dr Bouakhaykhone Svengsuksa2 Mr Sounthone Ketphanh3 1 Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh 2 National University of Lao PDR 3 Forest Research Center, National Agriculture and Forestry Research Institute, Lao PDR Supported by Darwin Initiative for the Survival of the Species Project 163-13-007 Cover illustration: Orchids and Cycads for sale near Gnommalat, Khammouane Province, Lao PDR, May 2006 (photo courtesy of Darwin Initiative) CONTENTS Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations used in this report Acknowledgements Summary _________________________________________________________________________ 1 Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) - background ____________________________________________________________________ 1 Lao PDR and CITES ____________________________________________________________ 1 Review of Plant Species Listed Under CITES Appendix I and II ____________ 1 Results of the Review_______________________________________________________ 1 Comments _____________________________________________________________________ 3 1. CITES Listed Plants in Lao PDR ______________________________________________ 5 1.1 An Introduction to CITES and Appendices I, II and III_________________ 5 1.2 Current State of Knowledge of the
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Philippine Orchids with Descriptions of New Species, 1.^=
    NOTES ON PHILIPPINE ORCHIDS WITH DESCRIPTIONS OF NEW SPECIES, I. By Oakes Ames, A. M., F. L. S. Director of the Botanic Garden of Harvard University. (From the Ames Botanical Laboratory, North Easton, Mass.. U. S. A.) Reprinted from THE PHILIPPINE JOURNAL OF SCIENCE Published by the Bureau of Science of the Philippine Government, Manila, P. I. Vol. IV, No. 5, Section C, Botany, November, 1909 MANILA BUREAU OF PRINTING 1909 S921C THE PHILIPPINE Journal of Sciench C. Botany Vol. IV NOVEMBER, 1909 No. 5 NOTES ON PHILIPPINE ORCHIDS WITH DESCRIPTIONS OF NEW SPECIES, 1.^= By Oakes Ames. (From the Ames Botanical Laboratory, Worth Easton, Mass., U. S. A.) Tt has been suggested by Dr. Fritz Kranzliu that the species of Dcn~ drochilum which I have assigned to the section Acoridmm ought to constitute a distinct genus. Dr. Kriinzlin asserts that the form of the labellum is quite distinctive in Acoridiuin on account of its likeness to the letter E. When I studied DendrochiluDi tenclhun in the preparation of Fascicle I of ^'^Orchidaceae" I felt strongly that it belonged to a genus entirely distinct from DendrocliUum because of the absence of stelidia from the column and of the peculiar subfiliform leaves. Since then I have been convinced by a study of more material that Acoridiuin belongs to DendrocliiJum. In the first place, the E-formed labellum on which Dr. Kranzlin lays emphasis is only characteristic of a majority of the species of the section Acoridiuin and is not found in D. turpe, D. oligan- fJiun), D. ]ia.'<fatum, I). McrrilJii and 1).
    [Show full text]
  • An Assessment of Orchids' Diversity in Penang Hill, Penang, Malaysia After
    Biodivers Conserv (2011) 20:2263–2272 DOI 10.1007/s10531-011-0087-z ORIGINAL PAPER An assessment of orchids’ diversity in Penang Hill, Penang, Malaysia after 115 years Rusea Go • Khor Hong Eng • Muskhazli Mustafa • Janna Ong Abdullah • Ahmad Ainuddin Naruddin • Nam Sook Lee • Chang Shook Lee • Sang Mi Eum • Kwang-Woo Park • Kyung Choi Received: 22 September 2010 / Accepted: 3 June 2011 / Published online: 12 June 2011 Ó The Author(s) 2011. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract A comprehensive study on the orchid diversity in Penang Hill, Penang, Malaysia was conducted from 2004 to 2008 with the objective to evaluate the presence of orchid species listed by Curtis (J Strait Br R Asiat Soc 25:67–173, 1894) after more than 100 years. A total of 85 species were identified during this study, of which 52 are epiphytic or lithophytic and 33 are terrestrial orchids. This study identified 57 species or 64.8% were the same as those recorded by Curtis (1894), and 78 species or 66.1% of Turner’s (Gar- dens’ Bull Singap 47(2):599–620, 1995) checklist of 118 species for the state of Penang including 18 species which were not recorded by Curtis (1894) and the current study but are actually collected from Penang Hill. A comparison table of the current findings against Curtis (1894) and Turner (1995) is provided which shows only 56 species were the same in all three studies. The preferred account for comparison was Curtis’ (1894) list as his report was specifically for the areas around Penang Island especially Penang Hill, Georgetown and Ayer Itam areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Checklist of Orchids in the Sungai Kangkawat, Imbak Canyon Conservation Area (ICCA), Sabah, Malaysia
    Journal of Tropical Biology and Conservation 17: 49–63, 2020 ISSN 1823-3902 E-ISSN 2550-1909 Short Notes Preliminary Checklist of Orchids in the Sungai Kangkawat, Imbak Canyon Conservation Area (ICCA), Sabah, Malaysia Edward Entalai Besi1, Dome Nikong4, Vanilie Terrence Justine5, Farah Alia Nordin2, Ahmad Asnawi Mus3, Heira Vanessa Nelson3, Nurul Najwa Mohamad3, Nor Azizun Rusdi3, Rusea Go1* 1Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia 2School of Biological Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800 USM, Penang, Malaysia 3Unit for Orchid Studies, Institute for Tropical Biology and Conservation, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, 88400 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia 4No.5, Bangunan PMINT, Kg Sungai Tong, 21500 Setiu, Terengganu, Malaysia 5Research and Education Division Sabah Parks, Lot 45 & 46, 1st-5th Floor, Block H, Signature Office, KK Times Square, Coastal Highway, 88100 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia *Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract A study on orchids diversity was carried out in the Sungai Kangkawat, Imbak Canyon Conservation Area (ICCA), Sabah, Malaysia. The study aimed to record species composition and distribution of orchids in the furtherance of orchid conservation objective in the gazetted conservation area. A total of 95 species and 30 genera were collected from South Rim, Kawang, and Nepenthes trails. The collection consists of 91 epiphytes, two terrestrials, and two mycoheterotrophs. More orchids were found in the riverine than inland areas. Our study on the species composition based on the vegetation types shows that the presence of inconspicuous and achlorophyllous, either mycoheterotrophic or leafless epiphytic orchids, are indicators of the undisturbed vegetation types. Though the finding was preliminary and brief, our encounter of endemic and rare species underlines the importance of Sungai Kangkawat forest area as an orchid biodiversity hotspot.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    A PRELIMINARY LIST OF THE ORCHIDS OF KHAO YAI NATIONAL PARK by P.F. CUMJ?ERLEGE AND V.M.S. CUMBEl{LEGI:: Introduction Khao Yai National Park lies in the Provinces of Nakorn Nayok, Prachinburi, Sraburi and Korat, roughly between latitude 14"S ' and 14"1S' North and longitude 101 "S' and 101 "SO' East. The total area is about 2,08S square kilometres. The Park is very roughly a rectangle 80 kms long and 40 kms at the wide3t part, enclosed by the Korat-Kabinburi H.oad on the East, the Korat/Prachinburi Changwad border on the North, the Huay Yai and Huay Muak Lek Rivers on the West and the line of rising ground north of the Hin Kong-Kabinburi Road on the South. The Park consists of forested hills and valleys, from about 4S0- 1400 metres high, with many old clearings at its lower-middle altitudes, i.e. from about 6S0-8SO m. Most of that part of the Park which is nor­ mally used by visitors lies in the central Khao Yai massif of rolling forest and grassland on either side of the Lam Takrong river. The latter flows across the park from West to East, turning Northwards in a big loop and flowing out of the Park in the direction of Pakchong, to the North-East. The river flows sluggishly for much of its way through the area, but has several waterfalls where the drop is anything up to SO m. There are three highish hills at the sides of the Park, namely Khao Laem to the North-East, Khao Khieow to the South-East, and Khao Sam Yod to the West.
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Checklist of the Orchidaceae of Laos
    Nordic Journal of Botany 26: 257Á316, 2008 doi: 10.1111/j.1756-1051.2008.00265.x, # 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation # Nordic Journal of Botany 2008 Subject Editor: Henrik Ærenlund Pedersen. Accepted 13 October 2008 An annotated checklist of the Orchidaceae of Laos Andre´ Schuiteman, Pierre Bonnet, Bouakhaykhone Svengsuksa and Daniel Barthe´le´my A. Schuiteman ([email protected]), Nationaal Herbarium Nederland, Univ. Leiden, PO Box 9514, NLÁ2300 RA Leiden, the Netherlands. Á P. Bonnet, CIRAD and UM2, UMR AMAP, FRÁ34000 Montpellier, France. Á B. Svengsuksa, National Univ. of Lao PDR, Faculty of Science, Dept of Biologie, PO Box 7322, Vientiane, Laos PDR. Á D. Barthe´le´my, INRA, UMR AMAP, FRÁ34000 Montpellier, France. A checklist is presented of the orchid flora of Laos, enumerating 485 species in 108 genera. An estimate is given of the expected size of the orchid flora of Laos. Notes on habitat, global and local distribution, endemism, conservation, phenology, as well as a systematic overview complement the checklist. Origin of the checklist Á The karst formations and montane forests in the Lak Xao district, Bolikhamxai province. The checklist presented below grew out of a UNESCO Á Various sites in the Phou Khao Khouay NBCA, project (reference no. 27213102 LAO) and the ORCHIS Vientiane and Bolikhamxai provinces. project (Bhttp://www.orchisasia.org/). The first, entitled Á The Phou Phanang NBCA, Vientiane prefecture. ‘Systematic study of the wild orchids in Lao P.D.R. and Á The Louangphrabang district, Louangphrabang pro- their conservation’, was conducted during the year 2005 by vince. Bouakhaykhone Svengsuksa. Some 700 living orchid speci- Á The Oudomxai district, Oudomxai province.
    [Show full text]
  • Orchids on Phu Kradueng's Plateau
    Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol. 39 (4), 479-487, Jul - Aug. 2017 http://www.sjst.psu.ac.th Original Article Orchids on Phu Kradueng’s plateau Purichaya Jongsirikankha1, Tosak Seelanan1*, and Thittasak Suriyachaiwatthana2,3 1,2 Plants of Thailand Research Unit, Department of Botany, Faculty of Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Pathum Wan, Bangkok, 10330 Thailand 2 Phu Kradueng National Park, Moo 1, Si Than, Phu Kradueng, Loei, 42180 Thailand 3 Na Yung - Nam Som National Park, Moo 2, Na Yung, Udonthani, 41380 Thailand Received: 11 May 2016; Revised: 6 July 2016; Accepted: 8 July 2016 Abstract Phu Kradueng plateau is the table-top mountain whose altitude ranges from 1,100m to 1,350m and harbors the large area of lower montane coniferous forest and lesser area of lower montane rain forest with many waterfalls. Sporadic floristic exploration has been made for as long as 60 years but no more than 60 species of orchids had ever recorded. Thus, the intensive orchid exploration in Phu Kradueng plateau was conducted from October, 2014 to February, 2016. Together with herbarium specimens and orchid’s census data, it was suggested that as many as 111 species of orchids should have been found on the plateau. Thus far, however, only 78 species had been recorded, and as many as 33 species still have not been seen in this study. Possible causes include illegal smuggling of wild orchids, habitat losses and changes caused by severe wild fires and climate changes. Keywords: orchids, Phu Kradueng National Park, Loei 1. Introduction Sanctuaries, Forest Parks, and reserved forest. However, the Orchidaceae in the “Flora of Thailand” has not been Orchidaceae is one of two largest families of flowering completed; reports on area-based “catalogs” of orchids still plants, consisting of about 27,800 accepted species in 736 remain largely undone.
    [Show full text]
  • Andaman & Nicobar Islands, India
    RESEARCH Vol. 21, Issue 68, 2020 RESEARCH ARTICLE ISSN 2319–5746 EISSN 2319–5754 Species Floristic Diversity and Analysis of South Andaman Islands (South Andaman District), Andaman & Nicobar Islands, India Mudavath Chennakesavulu Naik1, Lal Ji Singh1, Ganeshaiah KN2 1Botanical Survey of India, Andaman & Nicobar Regional Centre, Port Blair-744102, Andaman & Nicobar Islands, India 2Dept of Forestry and Environmental Sciences, School of Ecology and Conservation, G.K.V.K, UASB, Bangalore-560065, India Corresponding author: Botanical Survey of India, Andaman & Nicobar Regional Centre, Port Blair-744102, Andaman & Nicobar Islands, India Email: [email protected] Article History Received: 01 October 2020 Accepted: 17 November 2020 Published: November 2020 Citation Mudavath Chennakesavulu Naik, Lal Ji Singh, Ganeshaiah KN. Floristic Diversity and Analysis of South Andaman Islands (South Andaman District), Andaman & Nicobar Islands, India. Species, 2020, 21(68), 343-409 Publication License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. General Note Article is recommended to print as color digital version in recycled paper. ABSTRACT After 7 years of intensive explorations during 2013-2020 in South Andaman Islands, we recorded a total of 1376 wild and naturalized vascular plant taxa representing 1364 species belonging to 701 genera and 153 families, of which 95% of the taxa are based on primary collections. Of the 319 endemic species of Andaman and Nicobar Islands, 111 species are located in South Andaman Islands and 35 of them strict endemics to this region. 343 Page Key words: Vascular Plant Diversity, Floristic Analysis, Endemcity. © 2020 Discovery Publication. All Rights Reserved. www.discoveryjournals.org OPEN ACCESS RESEARCH ARTICLE 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Actes Colloque Blois
    CAHIERS DE LA SOCIÉTÉ FRANÇAISE D’ORCHIDOPHILIE N°9 – 2018 18th European Orchid Council Conference and Exhibition Proceedings What future for orchids? Proceedings of the 18th European Orchid Council Conference and Exhibition Scientific conference What future for orchids? 24-25 March 2018 Paris Event Center, Paris On behalf of L’orchidée en France Conference organizing committee: Richard Bateman, Alain Benoît, Pascale Besse, Yves Henry, Jana Jersákowá, Ray Ong, Daniel Prat, Marc-Andre Selosse, Tariq Stevart Cover photography from Philippe Lemettais Proceeding edition: Daniel Prat Cahiers de la Société Française d’Orchidophilie, N° 9, Proceedings of the 18th European Orchid Council Conference and Exhibition – Scientific conference: What future for orchids? ISSN 2648-2304 en ligne © SFO, Paris, 2018 Proceedings of the 18th European Orchid Council Conference and Exhibition – Scientific conference: What future for orchids? SFO, Paris, 2018, 166 p. Société Française d’Orchidophilie 17 Quai de la Seine, 75019 Paris Foreword The first European Orchid Council Conference and Exposition (EOCCE) was organized in 1967 in Vienna. The second conference followed 2 years later in 1969, together with the Floralies in Vincennes, Paris. 19 years later, in 1988 the EOCCE was again in Paris, the conference program was in a building at the Trocadero, the orchid exhibition was in a tent on the Champs de Mars, both localities with the perfect view to the most famous landmark of Paris, the Eiffel-tower. I still remember the storm during one afternoon, strong enough to force the responsible of the organization committee to shut down the exhibition for some hours. And now in 2018 we saw the 3rd EOCCE again in Paris, not in the heart of the town, but not too far away.
    [Show full text]
  • Contribution to the Bryological Knowledge of Malaysia Ii
    CONTRIBUTION TO THE BRYOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE OF MALAYSIA II. KEDAH PEAK P. Tixier* Kedah Peak (Gunong Jerai, 1,350 m), an isolated hill above the rice fields and near the sea, is at about forty kilometers South of Alor Star, the chief town of the Kedab State. One may think that the massive rocks are granitic. Dr. B.C. Stone of the University of Kuala Lumpur notes the ressemblance between this mountain and Mt. Bokor in Cambodia on the border of Thailand Gulf. This two stations are situated just above the sea shore and received directly the South-East moonson. Yet some difference may be noted: the Bohor is a wide plateau of about 30 km long, between Kampot and Sre Am bel and it is probable that its vegetal formations occupy all the mari­ time front of the Cardamones Range till the Thai border. On the other hand, Kedah Peak remains a regularly sloping massive of only 10 km in length and without any connection with other hill ranges; its slopes come steeply down to the sea and the plain. The two stations have a real dry season but the Bokor is probably wetter than the Kedah Peak because its annual rainfall is 3-4,000 rom, but only 2,000 mmjyear in the Kedah Plain. Considering the orientation of the massive, the southern and the northern faces are drier, the other ones wetter. There are no real different levels of vegetation along the slopes. The lowland forest remains poorly known botanically, and from the sea­ side, the first formation is the mangrove forest.
    [Show full text]