DOCSLIB.ORG

SOUTH SUDAN Humanitarian Snapshot January 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SOUTH SUDAN Humanitarian Snapshot January 2020 SOUTH SUDAN Humanitarian Snapshot January 2020 The 2020 Humanitarian Needs Overview estimated that approximately 7.5 million people will need humanitarian Clashes were reported between various armed groups in Upper Nile, and Central and Western Equatoria. assistance in 2020. Some 5.5 million people were expected to be acutely food insecure in January according to the Fighting in Maiwut County, Upper Nile, and in Yei and Lainya counties, Central Equatoria, led to the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) projections released in September 2019.1 A new IDP baseline displacement of more than 19,000 civilians—of these, over 8,000 sought refuge in Ethiopia. Clashes released by IOM and OCHA in January indicated that 1.67 million people were internally displaced as of November between armed youth groups in Mvolo County, Western Equatoria, displaced an estimated 5,000 people. 2019. This is a marginal increase from the IDP count published in September 2019, resulting mainly from increased Communal fighting, violent cattle raids, forceful recruitment and forced relocation were reported in geographic coverage of assessment locations. It does not represent an absolute increase in the number of IDPs in the Jonglei, Unity and Western Equatoria. An armed attack in the disputed Abyei area displaced an country.2 Pockets of populations continued to need assistance due to the 2019 floods. estimated 4,800 people and resulted in more than 50 civilian casualties. KEY FIGURES 7.5M 1.67M 190K 2.22M 298K 5.5M 597K 860k PEOPLE IN NEED INTERNALLY IDPS IN PROTECTION SOUTH SUDANESE REFUGEES IN SEVERELY FOOD MALNOURISHED MALNOURISHED DISPLACED PEOPLE OF CIVILIANS SITES REFUGEES SOUTH SUDAN INSECURE (JAN-APR) WOMEN (JAN-DEC) CHILDREN (JAN-DEC) DISPLACEMENT AND HOTSPOTS INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL DISPLACEMENT IPC ACUTE FOOD INSECURITY (JAN-APR) xx Estimated number of IDPs PoC site IPC Phase Catastrophe/ Famine ! PoC site xx South Sudanese refugees Location of conflict IDPs South Sudanese refugees Emergency Crisis 5M5000 Refugee location Cattle raiding Stressed SUDAN Minimal Internal displacement 810,917 Change in IDP population ABYEI 3.89M people displaced REGION P ! Upper Nile compared to previous baseline 4M4000 released in September 2019 SUDAN ! P Northern P Upper 2.22M Bahr el P Unity Nile Ghazal Warrap 3M3000 ETHIOPIA Western P Jonglei ABYEI REGION Bahr el ! Ghazal Unity 215,888 2M2000 CENTRAL Northern Lakes AFRICAN P ! Bahr el Ghazal REPUBLIC 247,614 1.67M Western Eastern 127,035 ETHIOPIA Equatoria Central Equatoria 1M1000 Equatoria P Warrap ! P Western Bahr 233,198 DEMOCRATIC KENYA 334,014 REPUBLIC OF el Ghazal 00 THE CONGO Jonglei Jan May Sep May Sep Jan Sept Jan May Sep Jan 16-Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar AprMayMay Jun July August Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan UGANDA 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 105,465 Lakes CENTRAL 196,055 AFRICAN 206,455 IDPs IN PROTECTION OF CIVILIANS SITES STAPLE FOOD PRICE TREND REPUBLIC 600 2,222 500 Western Equatoria 150 400 Central Eastern 7% 0-4 yr 7% Equatoria Equatoria 64,027 300 24% 100 5-17 yr 25% 61,225 200 DEMOCRATIC 208,853 KENYA 22%South Sudanese Pounds 18-59 yr 12% 100 REPUBLIC OF 50 South Sudanese pounds THE CONGO 88,717 119,799 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2% 60+ yr 1% 3.5 kg of white sorghum (Juba, Central Equatoria) UGANDA 861,590 0 2020 2019 Average 2017-2019 The administrative boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. Final boundary between the Republic of Sudan and the Republic of South Sudan has not been determined. Final Status of Abyei area is not yet determined. 1. IPC analysis for 2020 is ongoing. | 2. Based on IDP baseline set in January 2020 following Round 7 of the IOM-DTM assessements concluded in November 2019. Change of the IDP numbers should mainly be attributed to an increased coverage (operational expansion and newly gained access) which accounted for 11.3 per cent out of the total (1.67 million) IDPs assessed. Another 8.3 per cent is replicated from the previous rounds of data collection for 252 locations which were not assessed due to unusual seasonal flooding in Duk, Pibor, Maiwut, Melut and Ulang, and insecurity in Maiwut and Morobo. Creation date: 14 February 2020 | Sources: OCHA, IOM-DTM, UNHCR, IPC TWG, WFP-VAM | [email protected] | unocha.org/south-sudan | reliefweb.int/country/ssd | southsudan.humanitarianresponse.info I reports.unocha.org/south-sudan | @OCHASouthSudan .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Report on Western Equatoria Infographic V6 Final
    Joint report by United Nations Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS) and Ofce of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) Report on violations and abuses against civilians in Gbudue April–August and Tambura States, Western Equatoria 2018 INTRODUCTION This report is jointly published by the United Nations Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS) and the Ofce of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), pursuant to United Nations Security Council resolution 2406 (2018). The report presents the ndings of an investigation conducted by the UNMISS Human Rights Division (UNMISS HRD) into violations and abuses of international human rights law and violations of international humanitarian law reportedly committed by the pro-Machar Sudan People’s Liberation Army in Opposition (SPLA-IO (RM)) and the Government’s Sudan People’s Liberation Army (SPLA) against civilians in the states of Gbudue and Tambura, in Western Equatoria, between April and August 2018. The report documents the plight of civilians in the Western Equatoria region of South Sudan, where increased violence and attacks between April and August 2018 saw nearly 900 people abducted, including 505 women, and forced into sexual slavery or combat, and over 24,000 displaced from their homes. The report identies three SPLA-IO commanders who may bear the greatest responsibility for the violence committed against the civilian population in Western Equatoria during the period under consideration. HRD employed the standard of proof of reasonable grounds to believe in making factual determinations about the violations and abuses incidents, and patterns of conduct of the perpetrators. Unless specically stated, all information in the report has been veried using several independent, credible and reliable sources, in accordance with OHCHR’s human rights monitoring and investigation methodology.
    [Show full text]
  • Secretary-General's Report on South Sudan (September 2020)
    United Nations S/2020/890 Security Council Distr.: General 8 September 2020 Original: English Situation in South Sudan Report of the Secretary-General I. Introduction 1. The present report is submitted pursuant to Security Council resolution 2514 (2020), by which the Council extended the mandate of the United Nations Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS) until 15 March 2021 and requested me to report to the Council on the implementation of the Mission’s mandate every 90 days. It covers political and security developments between 1 June and 31 August 2020, the humanitarian and human rights situation and progress made in the implementation of the Mission’s mandate. II. Political and economic developments 2. On 17 June, the President of South Sudan, Salva Kiir, and the First Vice- President, Riek Machar, reached a decision on responsibility-sharing ratios for gubernatorial and State positions, ending a three-month impasse on the allocations of States. Central Equatoria, Eastern Equatoria, Lakes, Northern Bahr el-Ghazal, Warrap and Unity were allocated to the incumbent Transitional Government of National Unity; Upper Nile, Western Bahr el-Ghazal and Western Equatoria were allocated to the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement/Army in Opposition (SPLM/A-IO); and Jonglei was allocated to the South Sudan Opposition Alliance. The Other Political Parties coalition was not allocated a State, as envisioned in the Revitalized Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in the Republic of South Sudan, in which the coalition had been guaranteed 8 per cent of the positions. 3. On 29 June, the President appointed governors of 8 of the 10 States and chief administrators of the administrative areas of Abyei, Ruweng and Pibor.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 South Sudan Education Statistical Booklet
    Education Statistics for Western Equatoria Government of Republic of South Sudan Ministry of General Education and Instruction State Statistical Booklet Western Equatoria Republic of South Sudan Ministry of General Education and Instruction Directorate of Planning and Budgeting Department of Data and Statistics Education Management Information Systems Unit Juba, South Sudan www.goss.org © Ministry of General Education and Instruction 2012 This publication may be used as a part or as a whole, provided that the MoGEI is acknowledged as the source of information. This publication has been produced with financial and technical support from UNICEF, FHI360, and SCiSS. For inquiries or requests, please use the following contact information: George Mogga / Director for Planning and Budgeting / [email protected] Fahim Akbar / Senior EMIS Advisor / [email protected] Moses Kong / EMIS Officer / [email protected] Paulino Kamba / EMIS Officer / [email protected] Joanes Odero / Programme Associate / [email protected] Deng Chol Deng / Programme Associate / [email protected] 1 Foreword Message from Minister Joseph Ukel Abango On behalf of the Ministry of General Education and Instruction (MoGEI), I am pleased for the fifth education census data for the Republic of South Sudan (RSS). The collection and consolidation of the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of Learning Spaces (RALS) conducted in 2006. RALS covered less than half of the primary schools operating in the country at the time. By 2011, data from pre-primary, primary, secondary, an Alternative Education Systems (AES), and technical and vocational education and training (TVET) schools, centres, and institutes were collected.
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict and Crisis in South Sudan's Equatoria
    SPECIAL REPORT NO. 493 | APRIL 2021 UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE www.usip.org Conflict and Crisis in South Sudan’s Equatoria By Alan Boswell Contents Introduction ...................................3 Descent into War ..........................4 Key Actors and Interests ............ 9 Conclusion and Recommendations ...................... 16 Thomas Cirillo, leader of the Equatoria-based National Salvation Front militia, addresses the media in Rome on November 2, 2019. (Photo by Andrew Medichini/AP) Summary • In 2016, South Sudan’s war expand- Equatorians—a collection of diverse South Sudan’s transitional period. ed explosively into the country’s minority ethnic groups—are fighting • On a national level, conflict resolu- southern region, Equatoria, trig- for more autonomy, local or regional, tion should pursue shared sover- gering a major refugee crisis. Even and a remedy to what is perceived eignty among South Sudan’s con- after the 2018 peace deal, parts of as (primarily) Dinka hegemony. stituencies and regions, beyond Equatoria continue to be active hot • Equatorian elites lack the external power sharing among elites. To spots for national conflict. support to viably pursue their ob- resolve underlying grievances, the • The war in Equatoria does not fit jectives through violence. The gov- political process should be expand- neatly into the simplified narratives ernment in Juba, meanwhile, lacks ed to include consultations with of South Sudan’s war as a power the capacity and local legitimacy to local community leaders. The con- struggle for the center; nor will it be definitively stamp out the rebellion. stitutional reform process of South addressed by peacebuilding strate- Both sides should pursue a nego- Sudan’s current transitional period gies built off those precepts.
    [Show full text]
  • 09.04.20 South Sudan Program
    South Sudan USG Response to the Complex Emergency COUNTRYWIDE PROGRAMS Response Sectors: SUDAN Agriculture Economic Recovery, Market Systems, and Livelihoods Education Food Assistance CHAD Health Humanitarian Coordination and Information Management Humanitarian Policy, Studies, Analysis, or Application Multipurpose Cash Assistance Logistics Support and Relief Commodities Abyei Area- UPPER NILE Disputed* Nutrition Protection NORTHERN UNITY Shelter and Settlements CENTRAL BAHR EL GHAZAL Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene AFRICAN WARRAP REPUBLIC WESTERN BAHR EL GHAZAL JONGLEI LAKES Response Partners: ETHIOPIA AAH/USA Mentor Initiative WESTERN EQUATORIA ACTED Mercy Corps EASTERN EQUATORIA ALIMA Nonviolent Peaceforce ARC NRC CENTRAL CONCERN OCHA EQUATORIA CRS Relief International Danish Refugee Council (DRC) Samaritan's Purse Doctors of the World SCF FAO Tearfund ICRC UNHCR IFRC UNICEF IMC VSF/G UGANDA KENYA Internews WFP (UNHAS) IOM WFP DEMOCRATIC IRC WHO REPUBLIC Lutheran World Federation World Vision, Inc. (USA) MEDAIR, SWI WRI OF THE CONGO * Final sovereignty status of Abyei Area pending negotiations between South Sudan and Sudan. IDPs in South Sudan Estimated Food Security Levels # By State " UNMISS IDP Site SUDAN THROUGH SEPTEMBER 2020 # Malakal UNMISS 1: Minimal 4: Emergency 60,000 - 100,000 IDP Site ~813,300 base: 27,900 100,000 - 150,000 Host Communities # 2: Stressed 5: Famine 150,000 - 200,000 ## 3: Crisis No Data Abyei Area - 200,000 - 250,000 Bentiu UNMISS Disputed # Source: FEWS NET, South Sudan Outlook, August - September 2020 base: 111,800 ~9,300 ## ## # # ~233,800# # ## # ##"# # # #"# # ### # #~76,400 # # # ~226,000 # # # # # # # ### Wau UNMISS # ETHIOPIA ##~246,700 # base: 10,000 #"## # ~71,200 ~346,300 # # ~207,200 # ~187,200 # # Bor C.A.R. UNMISS # ~2,600 #"# base: # # 1,900 ## # ~70,900 ## # # # ~60,100 Map reflects FEWS NET # ##"# # # # food security projections # Refugees in Neighboring Countries #~220,800 # at the area level.
    [Show full text]
  • Wfp256400.Pdf
    Acknowledgements This report is a collaborative effort of the Republic of South Sudan ministries, UN agencies and development partners. These include: Food Security Technical Secretariat (FSTS), National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (MoAF), Ministry of Animal Resources and Fisheries (MoARF), Relief and Rehabilitation Commission (RRC) and Ministry of Health (MoH). The activity was funded by the World Food Programme (WFP). The UN agencies included: Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), World Food Programme, United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) and United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (UNOCHA). We gratefully acknowledge support provided by Famine Early Warning Systems Network (FEWS NET) and all partners of the Food Security and Livelihoods and Nutrition clusters for their invaluable inputs and the ANLA Technical Working Group (chaired by FSTS) that dedicated their time to contribute different chapters of the report. We especially thank Manase Yanga Laki, Elijah Luak (MoAF), Bernard Owadi, Idiku Michael, Hersi Mohamud, Gummat Abdallatif, Yomo Lawrence (WFP VAM Team), Elijah Mukhala (FAO), Mtendere Mphatso (FSL Cluster), Gloria Kusemererwa of WFP Nutrition Unit who prepared specific chapters of the report. Overall technical editing and layout of the report was done by WFP VAM Unit. Last but not least we thank all the men and women who braved difficult terrain and long travel hours to provide the empirical data used for this report. For questions or comments concerning
    [Show full text]
  • C the Impact of Conflict on the Livestock Sector in South Sudan
    C The Impact of Conflict on the Livestock Sector in South Sudan ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors would like to express their gratitude to the following persons (from State Ministries of Livestock and Fishery Industries and FAO South Sudan Office) for collecting field data from the sample counties in nine of the ten States of South Sudan: Angelo Kom Agoth; Makuak Chol; Andrea Adup Algoc; Isaac Malak Mading; Tongu James Mark; Sebit Taroyalla Moris; Isaac Odiho; James Chatt Moa; Samuel Ajiing Uguak; Samuel Dook; Rogina Acwil; Raja Awad; Simon Mayar; Deu Lueth Ader; Mayok Dau Wal and John Memur. The authors also extend their special thanks to Erminio Sacco, Chief Technical Advisor and Dr Abdal Monium Osman, Senior Programme Officer, at FAO South Sudan for initiating this study and providing the necessary support during the preparatory and field deployment phases. DISCLAIMER FAO South Sudan mobilized a team of independent consultants to conduct this study. The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of FAO. COMPOSITION OF STUDY TEAM Yacob Aklilu Gebreyes (Team Leader) Gezu Bekele Lemma Luka Biong Deng Shaif Abdullahi i C The Impact of Conflict on the Livestock Sector in South Sudan TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...I ABBREVIATIONS ..................................................................................................................................................... VI NOTES ..................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Western Equatoria State
    ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Western Equatoria State Map ! ! ! " ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! 27°E 28°E 29°E ! ! ! 30°E 31°E ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Yafa Gumbolo !Gau Abiriu ! ! ! Langcok Rabengai River Lau !Jummayzah Da Billinguit ! Wereboi ! Gok Tik ! Longo !Ninong Wau ! ! !Akwoing ! ! Guln! a!mAber ! Raffili Ag Ngrial ! ! !Akuoc-Cok ! Western Bahr el Ghazal ! Manyang Ajit !Ador Kwech ! ! ! ! Amolbut ! Manyang Dak Kok Deim Bakhit Malwal Abeir ! ! Bo River Post Jur River Cueibet ! Rumbek ! Nahr Naam Adior ! ! ! ! ! Rumbek ! Raga Chito Leku ! ! Adol ! ! ! !Riyek ! Yirol East Pa!kujiak Mayom ! Yand!u ! Domadoma l ! ! Ma!uoa ! Poloich !Angweri e Bahr Gel ! !Amerachir ! Gorok Law! Pagarau ! ! Qawz Dengwiri !Wango G ! Rumbek East ! . ! ! ! ! Abin Ajok ! ! ! Pobat R ! ! ! Ger !Yang ! Akwir Billing Pacong Koriom! ! ! ! ! ongo ! R. P Makembeli ! ! ! Nirang Abang ! Ragao ! Pan-Awach !Lang ! Langeiek ! Ubori ! ! Alel Tonj South ! Gopp! ! ! Kap ! Umbabatu ! ! ! Lang Karich !Margar ! Ndia Mal!ou ! Naam! !Kporogedi Lakes ! ! ! Elelpaich! ! Alliab !Ayen ! ! Ak!wei Warrap ! ! A! tiabba ! ! Pakok ! ! G!ok !! ! ! Nadiangere Iniviru Bolmanyango ! ! Mayom Chuei Yirol ! ! ! Akot ! " ! ! Ngukyu Alcool ! Higoli Said Gatti ! " Elerwey! ! Kumio ! ! ! ! Deper Tiit Agok ! Wullu ! ! ! ! ! ! Kelwon Nagero ! Makur-Agar !Payii ! !Ruku ! River Tuju Kool Cum Atiriu ! Aliep ! ! Megak ! ! ! Aluakluak ! Ndei K! unga ! ! ! Gutthom ! T! honic Agany ! Dirjai Nagero ! Lol ! ! Geng-Geng ! j ! !Hibbi Delindia on ! . T Ngap-Pankon ! Mamer R Billing ! !Tebbe Da Molam!udi ! ! !Madbar !Meding! !Lam ! Mayom !Ka! kor ! ! ! ! River Rohl Mapuordit Komangba Madalla ! ! Damb!lu ! Matinga Madet Abongkeu ! ! Ngoia Bungaru ! Mboyo ! ! Beir ! Bambu ! ! Rua ! Suo Wulu ! ! !Wilsary Mbelembo Riggu Yirol West ! ! ! ! Toinya Ngop Guamari Bilmogga !Domolotto ! !Lualdit Paker! ! Du Nangume !Mbia ! Unagok Alel ! Kuloti Modi Gweni ! m Gumro ! ! a Kulu ! ! ! ! ! To! ko Wako ! ! Marar ! a Bunagok ! ! Atiit ! Dagai ! ! ! ! N !Eassi Dekada Pul Anyuol Anuol ! ! ! Dado! Maringa .
    [Show full text]
  • Western Equatoria State Map " Type Jonglei ") N State Capitals N " Western Bahr El Ghazal " 0 0 ' ' 0 0
    27°0'0"E 28°0'0"E 29°0'0"E 30°0'0"E " 31°0'0"E Tonj ") Unity Settlements Western Equatoria State Map " Type Jonglei ") N State Capitals N " Western Bahr el Ghazal " 0 0 ' ' 0 0 ° ") ° 7 Larger Towns 7 Warrap " Towns Lakes ") Big Villages Rumbek Ragao Small Villages Kporogedi Main Road Network Nadiangere Akot Yirol Ngukyu Alcool Kumio " ") Nagero County Boundaries Aliep Gutthom Delindia Hibbi State Boundaries Tebbe River Rohl Komangba Mapuordit Mapuordit National Boundary Ngoia Suo Mboyo Beir Rua Bungaru Korikori Madet Wilsary Laru Guamari Bilmogga Diungo Pulkum Du Nangume Kuloti Marar Modi Gweni Jokki Abbot International Boundaries TAMBURA Bor Dagai Eassi Dekada Moyat Luak River Kumu Dado Doku Maringa Kulu Bandala Whelbi Umbelti Minikolome Desere Uweli Awerial Nyendella Khogali Wara Bahr El Girin Marra Hills " Kussu Korai Kerjok Mvolo Assombo Mbakaia Kidi Gatanga Mamgumi Ndo " Ageng Tabau N Dogoba N " River Yubo Anganja " Nguku 0 0 ' Dibira Ambo Kila ' 0 Bittima Tolla 0 ° Duma Higola ° 6 Namutina Gira Domeri 6 M'bittima Wia Rigl Duma Mangi Dazaki Bufi Tali Lindi " Makangere Diaturu Lesi Awiri Lanioro Ali Bundit Ngogola Banwar Dakada Dari Renzi Nakape Kadi Yeri Biarubo Kirma " Teri Delinoi Mulinda Sassa Azai Kasiko Central Duboro Kulundulu Rigl Biki Madi Biti Bogori Andari African Koranza Koraja Gabir Tambura Duwwo Pagar Gulu Rushi Yeba Fort Hossinger Zangia Rika Liki Republic ") Abdulla Mbara Berri Lamindo Bukba Kpakpawiya Zabit Resi Onayo Amadi Kediba Bukita unknown Tagura Ire " Keza Wandi Mupoi Doso Wito Nambi Madoro Dali Bani Riku
    [Show full text]
  • Internews in South Sudan Map Updated May 2020
    INTERNEWS IN SOUTH SUDAN MAP UPDATED MAY 2020 SUDAN SUDAN UPPER NILE SUDAN Jamjang 11 3 Gendrassa Abyei 1 2 UNITY 34 Malakal 40 Bentiu 0 km 100 km Turalei 7 SUDAN 4 5 Nasir WESTERN Aweil BAHR EL NORTHERN GHAZAL BAHR EL 32 GHAZAL Kwajok WARRAP D.R. 41 Wau ETHIOPIA CONGO 42 Leer Pochala 36 JONGLEI 37 38 Rumbek LAKES 8 9 10 6 Bor South Awerial Sudan WESTERN Mundri EASTERN EQUATORIA 35 EQUATORIA 12 18 24 30 13 19 25 Ilemi- Kapoeta Dreieck Yambio Juba 14 20 26 15 21 27 31 TYPES OF ORGANIZATIONS 43 16 22 28 Radio Station 17 23 29 Torit Repeaters CENTRAL KENYA Media Training Institution EQUATORIA Magwi DEMOCRATIC 33 Advocacy Organization REPUBLIC OF Media Outlet THE CONGO Community-Based Organization UGANDA Associate Partner Type Location Partner Reach (if applicable) Partnership Active 1 Radio Station Abyei, Agok Abyei FM 60 km radius 2015 - Present 3 Radio Station Jamjang, Unity Jamjang FM 60 km radius 2016 - Pesent 4 Radio Station Aweil, Northern Bahr el Ghazal Akol Yam 91.0FM 150 km radius 2017 - Present 6 Radio Station Awerial, Lakes Mingkaman 100FM 150 km radius 2014 - Present 7 Radio Station Bentiu, Unity Kondial FM 30 km radius 2018 - Present 8 Radio Station Bor, Jonglei Radio Jonglei 50 km radius 2018 11 Radio Station Gendrassa, Upper Nile Radio Salam 30 km radius 2019 - Present 19 Radio Station Juba, Central Equatoria Radio Bakhita 100 km radius 2015-2016 23 Radio Station Juba, Central Equatoria Advance Youth Radio 50 km radius 2019 - Present 26 Radio Station Juba, Central Equatoria Eye Radio 60 km radius 2014 - Present 28 Radio Station
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Ethnic Groups in Southern Sudan Exact Representationw Ohf Iteh En Isleituation Ins Tehnen Acrountry
    Ethnic boundaries shown on this map are not an Distribution of Ethnic Groups in Southern Sudan exact representationW ohf iteh eN isleituation inS tehnen aCrountry. The administrative units and their names shown on this map do not imply White acceptance or recognition by the Government of Southern Sudan. Blue ") State Capitals This map aims only to support the work of the Humanitarian Community. Nile Renk Nile Sudan Renk Admin. Units County Level Southern Darfur Southern Shilluk Berta Admin. Units State Level Kordofan Manyo Berta Country Boundary Manyo Melut International Boundaries Shilluk Maban Sudan Fashoda Dinka (Abiliang) Abyei Pariang Upper Nile Burum Malakal Data Sources: National and State Dinka (Ruweng) ") boundaries based on Russian Sudan Malakal Baliet Abiemnhom Panyikang Map Series, 1:200k, 1970-ties. Rubkona Guit County Boundaries digitized based on Aweil North Statistical Yearbook 2009 Aweil East Twic Mayom ") Nuer (Jikany) Canal (Khor Fulus) Longochuk Southern Sudan Commission for Census, Dinka (Twic WS) Nuer (Bul) Statistics and Evaluation - SSCCSE. Fangak Dinka (Padeng) Digitized by IMU OCHA Southern Sudan Aweil West Dinka (Malual) Nuer (Lek) Gogrial East Unity Nuer (Jikany) Northern Bahr el Ghazal ") Luakpiny/Nasir Aweil Maiwut Aweil South Raga Koch Gogrial West Nuer (Jegai) Nyirol Ulang Nuer (Gawaar) Aweil Centre Warrap ") Tonj North Ayod Kwajok Mayendit Leer Dinka (Rek) Fertit Chad Nuer (Adok) Nuer (Lou) Jur Chol Tonj East ") Wau Akobo Western Bahr el Ghazal Nuer (Nyong) Dinka (Hol) Uror Duk Jur River Rumbek North Panyijar
    [Show full text]
  • Bentiu IDP Camp Flow Monitoring January – March 2021
    Bentiu IDP Camp Flow Monitoring January – March 2021 IOM’s Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM) continued operating Displacement Site Flow Monitoring (DSFM) at the gates of Bentiu IDP camp. In the first Methodology: quarter of 2021 (January – March), 5,505 interviews were conducted representing 19,230 individual movements in and out of the site. There has been a 12.0 Displacement Site Flow Monitoring (DSFM) involves per cent decrease in surveyed day movements compared to the previous quarter. Most day movements were by women and girls (80.0%), usually travelling interviewing a cross-section of persons passing through the site’s entry and exit points. DTM aims to understand mobility for livelihood reasons. The most common reason for longer temporary movement was to visit friends or family (22.0%), followed by attempting to return dynamics and reasons underpinning movement in and out home (17.7%). Flow monitoring enumerators also surveyed 169 newly arriving individuals, compared to 64 in October – December 2020, 44.5 per cent of of the site to provide partners with a better understanding of same day movement, temporary travel, new entry and whom intend to stay more than six months. About two in five individuals came to join family (42.0%), followed by access to healthcare (16.6%) and family permanent exit. Interviews are conducted seven days a week visits (14.0%). The number of surveyed permanent exits increased to 206, from 176 in October – December 2020, 70.0 per cent of whom were women from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. DSFM provides indicative traveller profiles and girls.
    [Show full text]