DOCSLIB.ORG

Bentiu IDP Camp Flow Monitoring January – March 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bentiu IDP Camp Flow Monitoring January – March 2021 Bentiu IDP Camp Flow Monitoring January – March 2021 IOM’s Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM) continued operating Displacement Site Flow Monitoring (DSFM) at the gates of Bentiu IDP camp. In the first Methodology: quarter of 2021 (January – March), 5,505 interviews were conducted representing 19,230 individual movements in and out of the site. There has been a 12.0 Displacement Site Flow Monitoring (DSFM) involves per cent decrease in surveyed day movements compared to the previous quarter. Most day movements were by women and girls (80.0%), usually travelling interviewing a cross-section of persons passing through the site’s entry and exit points. DTM aims to understand mobility for livelihood reasons. The most common reason for longer temporary movement was to visit friends or family (22.0%), followed by attempting to return dynamics and reasons underpinning movement in and out home (17.7%). Flow monitoring enumerators also surveyed 169 newly arriving individuals, compared to 64 in October – December 2020, 44.5 per cent of of the site to provide partners with a better understanding of same day movement, temporary travel, new entry and whom intend to stay more than six months. About two in five individuals came to join family (42.0%), followed by access to healthcare (16.6%) and family permanent exit. Interviews are conducted seven days a week visits (14.0%). The number of surveyed permanent exits increased to 206, from 176 in October – December 2020, 70.0 per cent of whom were women from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. DSFM provides indicative traveller profiles and girls. The most common reason for exit was improved circumstances at destination (32.0%), followed by looking for education opportunities (19.0%). rather than comprehensive or representative estimates. April Population Count 100,051 ind. (15,554 households) 49,502 (49%) Male 50,549 (51%) Female Same Day Travel n = 8,005 Temporary Travel n = 10,850 New Arrivals n = 169 Permanent Exits n = 206 20% 80% 32% 68% 38% 62% 30% 70% Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Most common reason for Most common reason for Life is now better at Most common reason: Collect firewood Most common reason: Visit friends/ family To be with family moving in to the site: moving out of the site: destination Top reasons for same day movement Top reasons for temporary movement Top reasons for new arrivals Top reasons for permanent exit Collect firewood Visit friends / family To be with family Life is now better in destination 23% 23% 22% 6% 16% 42% 15% 27% 32% 10% 22% Collect elephant grass Attempt to return home Healthcare generally Looking for education opportunities 18% 18% 17.7% 4.3% 13.4% 16% 8% 8% 19% 8% 11% Make / sell charcoal Check on / repair property Visit friends / family Looking for livelihood / work opportunities 13.9% 6.4% 7.5% 13.4% 4.8% 8.6% 14% 4% 11% 17% 3% 14% Visit friends / family Collect firewood Access to services To be with family 10.7% 3.4% 7.3% 11% 4% 7% 7% 2% 5% 16% 5% 11% Reduced/canceledSand / so servicesil at the site following- Leaving temporarily to avoid the congested site Destroyed home due to natural disaster Leaving because of uncomfortable living conditions 9 % 9 % COVID-19 prevention measures 9% 3 % 6 % as I’m concerned about COVID-19 6.5% 4% 2% 5.8% 1.4% 4.4% Reasons continued: Reasons continued: Collect elephant grass (6%), reduced/canceled services at the Reasons continued: Reasons continued: Leaving because of irregular or insufficient food rations (5%), site following COVID-19 prevention measures (5%), food To buy things (4%), food disrtribution on-site (3%), other live- Education (4%), hunger because of natural disaster (2.4%), leaving becasuse of lack of water (4%), and leaving because of distribution on-site (3%), cattle camp visit (3%), and others lihood activity (3%), washing clothes (3%), and other (11%). access to livelihood opportunities (2%), and other (6%). congested site due to COVID-19 fears (1%). (10%). Daily gate count Intended period of stay/ time spent away Intended period of stay at the site Nature & top destinations of permanent exits During the outbreak of COVID-19, DTM conducted 2 - 3 months Probably more than 6 months Nature of % of permanent Main location by nature 30% daily gate counts for individual movements in and out 20% 10% 44.4% 17.8% 26.6% Destination exit of destination of the site. Daily average movement from January 2 - 4 weeks 4 - 6 months to March 2021 are as indicated in the table below. 26% 15% 11% 16.5% 4.7% 11.8% Former home 74% Rubkona, Guit 1 - 7 days (stayed at least one night) 2 - 3 months Month Entry Average Exit Average Net Flow New home, dif- 22% 7% 15% 14.2% 5.9% 8.3% 21% Kampala (UGA), Juba Probably more than 6 months ferent area January 16,394 15,681 +713 1 - 7 days 12% 4% 8% 14.3% Former area but 3.6% 10.7% 5% Koch February 16,794 16,504 +290 4 - 6 months 2 - 4 weeks new home 9% 7% 2% 10.6% 6.5% 4.1% Other Displace- - - March 16,683 15,820 +863 Begin Temporary travel Return from temporary travel Male Female ment site Note: [Rounding] Percentages may not add up to 100% as a result of rounding error. Bentiu IDP Camp Flow Monitoring January – March 2021 Movement Dynamics Return from temporary travel n = 5,143 Embarking on temporary journey n = 5,707 Return Temporary Travel River Nile Northern River Nile Begin Temporary Travel From Temporary Travel a la Begin Temporary Travel al Umm Badda a Counties of origin ass Counties of intended destinations 1 - 30 ss 3 - 6 K Sharq El Nile a Um Durman 31 - 68 K 7 - 9 Jabal Aulia Um Durman ra 69 - 143 Jabal Aulia 10 -N 1o8r2th Darfur North Kordofan azi North Darfur W North Kordofan Rubkona 53% G G Rubkona 43% 144 - 339 183 - 335 El h e G d y e i ra 340 - 910 da Tig 336 - 708 t a ig ray e re T S u d a n r S u d a n f Country e Country S u d a n N Se S f W n i W e Guit 22% n Guit 19% n l a na e r Admin 1 Admin 1 e e r s s A t t r K K r m u e u e l S f o S h f or out l i i Koch 10% r E o r r u Koch 17% E h t a a d h a a N a do K r o N K s o o a s r D D d t r e t d of f f a Amhara D o u D ue a f a n h a h l n l t n a n U a U B u r B V r V f p f out Leer 4% o p ur u Mayendit 11% a a pe p S S r ka k e r a r g N g N a Rubkona a RubkonaUnity i W Guit i Mayom l Guit e E t h i o p i a Mayendit 4% Mayom l Leer 8% E t h i o p i a e Northern Bahr el Ghazal a E tth ii o p ii a UnityKoch r o Northern Bahr el Ghazal r Koch t a o Leer p Oromia t ot WarrapMayendit t MayenditLeer K o - Western Bahr el Ghazal Panyijiar Other 7% Other 2% e K Western Bahr el Ghazal Jonglei - Panyijiar ut e t a Jonglei tt rra ll A ff rr ii c a n R e p u b ll ii c Lake u H s Snnpr n tt rra ll A aff rr ii c a n R e p u b ll ii c Lakes H S o u tt h S u d a n Snnpr mou W Mbo ou ester S o u t h S u d a n Western Equatoria toria om n E Equa Mb quat Central EquatoriaJuba stern Oromia oria oria Ea T Equat u Juba tern r s T k Central Equatoria Ea Morobo a M u Bas-Uele na r M a k Haut-Uele rs Ha a Ayivu ab Bas-Uele ut-U a r it ele n sa D e m o c rr a ttiic R e p u b lliic o ff C o n g o a b U g a n d a K e n y a D e m o c rr a ttii c R e p u b ll ii c o ff C o n g o U g a n d a it i K e n y a Tshopo Itur The maps above do not include same-day travel, which tends to be limited to the immediate surroundings of the site. New arrivals n = 169 Permanent exit n = 206 New Entry Permanent Exit New Entry Kassala KhartoumSharq El Nile Kassala Counties of origin Permanent Exit Khartoum Counties of intended destinations 1 - 2 Um Durman 1 - 2 Jabal Aulia 3 - 5 Jabal Aulia North Kordofan ira North Kordofan ra 3 - 4 North Darfur az 6 - 8 zi l G G Ga 5 - 9 E e North Darfur l Leer 18% da ay Rubkona 23% 9 - 15 E Tigr ay 10 - 13 re 16 - 21 W Gedaref igr S f T 14 - 64 S u d a n W en h na e r Country S u d a n i t S u d a n Um Rawaba S Country s e e n Rubkona 16% t Guit 22% N na K Admin 1 r Admin 1 r W u S e l i Amhara f or out i l r E r e e h a A a do K N u s o f s r t m D d r t K of Mayom 11% f a a e D ue Koch 17% Dilling a n h E l h l n or i a U a D a r B r s S N f p a do out h t out V ur pe D h a S f K ue ka o l a r out a r r d N n of Guit 10% g S f B Rubkona Leer 8% ur an a U i Mayom Guit l e E t h i o p i a p E t h i o p i a Northern Bahr el Ghazal Koch pe Unity romia r Juba 9% Leer O N WarrapMayendit Kampala (UGA) 7% Rubkona Panyikang to i Guit l ot Western Bahr el Ghazal Panyijiar W Mayom e K e Northern Bahr el Ghazal E tth ii o p ii a e- s W C e n t r a l uAt f r i c a n R e p u b l i c Jonglei te Unity C e n t rHa al A f r i c a n R e p u b l i c rn a Koch Panyijar 7% Lake Juba 6% B r s r Ayod Oromia Snnpr a a MayenditLeer G h p a r m S o u t h S u d a n el be ou S o u t h S u d a n G l m ha Panyijiar la Jabal Aulia (SDN) 6% bo H M Western Equatoria oria Khartoum 5% a za Jonglei quat ut l Central EquatoriaJuba tern E - Eas M Lakes bom Snnpr T a ll A ff rr ii c a n R e p u b ll ii c Khartoum (SDN) 5% u M Other 12% r S o u tt h S u d a n Bas-Uele k ou e a Haut-Uel a r na s We a stern a b Equ l it a ia a Other 18% ga tor Central Equatoria tor i D e m o c r a t i c R e p u b l i c o f C o n g o U g a n d a ia ern Equa on D e m o c r a t i c R e p u b l i c o f C o n g o K e n y a Juba East M na om a r Ituri m o c rr aBtt iiacs- UR eelpeu b ll ii c o ff C o n g o urk Tshopo T K e n y a O U g a n d a K e n y a.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Warrap State SOUTH SUDAN
    COMMUNITY CONSULTATION REPORT Warrap State SOUTH SUDAN Bureau for Community Security South Sudan Peace and Small Arms Control and Reconciliation Commission United Nations Development Programme The Bureau for Community Security and Small Arms Control under the Ministry of Interior is the Gov- ernment agency of South Sudan mandated to address the threats posed by the proliferation of small arms and community insecurity to peace and development. The South Sudan Peace and Reconciliation Commission is mandated to promote peaceful co-existence amongst the people of South Sudan and advise the Government on matters related to peace. The United Nations Development Programme in South Sudan, through the Community Security and Arms Control Project supports the Bureau strengthen its capacity in the area of community security and arms control at the national, state, and county levels. Cover photo: © UNDP/Sun-Ra Lambert Baj COMMUNITY CONSULTATION REPORT Warrap State South Sudan Published by South Sudan Bureau for Community Security and Small Arms Control South Sudan Peace and Reconciliation Commission United Nations Development Programme MAY 2012 JUBA, SOUTH SUDAN CONTENTS Acronyms ........................................................................................................................... i Foreword ........................................................................................................................... .ii Executive Summary .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Western Equatoria Infographic V6 Final
    Joint report by United Nations Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS) and Ofce of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) Report on violations and abuses against civilians in Gbudue April–August and Tambura States, Western Equatoria 2018 INTRODUCTION This report is jointly published by the United Nations Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS) and the Ofce of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), pursuant to United Nations Security Council resolution 2406 (2018). The report presents the ndings of an investigation conducted by the UNMISS Human Rights Division (UNMISS HRD) into violations and abuses of international human rights law and violations of international humanitarian law reportedly committed by the pro-Machar Sudan People’s Liberation Army in Opposition (SPLA-IO (RM)) and the Government’s Sudan People’s Liberation Army (SPLA) against civilians in the states of Gbudue and Tambura, in Western Equatoria, between April and August 2018. The report documents the plight of civilians in the Western Equatoria region of South Sudan, where increased violence and attacks between April and August 2018 saw nearly 900 people abducted, including 505 women, and forced into sexual slavery or combat, and over 24,000 displaced from their homes. The report identies three SPLA-IO commanders who may bear the greatest responsibility for the violence committed against the civilian population in Western Equatoria during the period under consideration. HRD employed the standard of proof of reasonable grounds to believe in making factual determinations about the violations and abuses incidents, and patterns of conduct of the perpetrators. Unless specically stated, all information in the report has been veried using several independent, credible and reliable sources, in accordance with OHCHR’s human rights monitoring and investigation methodology.
    [Show full text]
  • An Article on Explosion of Ethnic Violence in Warrap State in South Sudan
    South American Journal of Academic Research Special Edition May 2016 An article on explosion of ethnic violence in Warrap state In south Sudan Article by Emmanuel Moju, MSC on clinical psychology, Texila American University, South Sudan Email: [email protected] Abstract As matter of facts, ethnic conflict is an outcome of number of interrelated factors. It is important to cautiously and thoroughly study each of these factors and establish relationship among the characteristics involved. Appropriate approach is useful in an endeavor to resolve ethnic conflicts through a peaceful means. Ethnic conflict leads, among other things, to the breakdown of law and order, the disruption of economic activities, political stability, humanitarian crises and a state of uncertainty which prevent long run investment and development efforts and peace. A case on line is the conflict that broke out between the SPLA and SPLA in opposition on 15th December 2013, in South Sudan, all the developments made from independence till the date were gone. Violent ethnic conflict leads to extraordinary displacement of people including vulnerable groups such as women, children, the elderly as well as the disabled who often are seriously affected by violent conflict. Therefore, it is worthwhile to give due concern to interethnic relations and manage it cautiously and systematically. Conflict is like contagious disease. Unwise handling of conflict gives it the opportunity to widespread all of a sudden. If it occurred, conflict must be handled at its early stages. Once allowed to escalate, it would change to violence that cannot be easily remedied and control. A good example is the Central Africa Republic ongoing ethnic violence between the Muslims and the Christians (Alemayehu, Fantaw.
    [Show full text]
  • 20170331 Abyei
    Abyei Report Village Assessment Survey | Nov - Dec 2016 IOM OIM bomas functional functional reported villages are 73% education 73% health 52% presence of 21% deserted facilities facilities UXOs. RUMAMEER RUMAMEER MAJAK payams hosting the majority of IDPs ABYEI TOWN payams receiving the majority of returnees ALAL MAJAK MAIN SURVEY RECOMMENDATIONS MAIN RECOMMENDATION livelihood diversication Rehabilitate and Engage in sustained activities operationalize key public community-level dialogue infrastructure Ed Dibeikir Ramthil Raqabat Rumaylah Nyam Roba Nabek Umm Biura El Amma Mekeines Zerafat SUDABeida N Ed Dabkir Shagawah Duhul Kawak Al Agad Al Aza Meiram Tajiel Dabib Farouk Debab Pariang Um Khaer Langar Di@ra Raqaba Kokai Es Saart El Halluf Pagol Bioknom Pandal Ajaj Kajjam Majak Ghabush En Nimr Shigei Di@ra Ameth Nyak Kolading 15,685 Gumriak 2 Aguok Goli Ed Dahlob En Neggu Fagai 1,055 Dumboloya Nugar As Sumayh Alal Alal Um Khariet Bedheni Baar Todach Saheib Et Timsah Noong 13,130 Ed Derangis Tejalei Feid El Kok Dungoup Padit DokurAbyeia Rumameer Todyop Madingthon 68,372 Abu Qurun Thurpader Hamir Leu 12,900 Awoluum Agany Toak Banton Athony Marial Achak Galadu Arik Athony Grinঞ Agach Awal Aweragor Madul Northern Bahr Agok Unity State Lort Dal el Ghazal Abiemnom Baralil Marsh XX Population in need SOUTH SUDANMolbang Warrap State Ajakuao 0 25 50 km The boundaries on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the Government of the Republic of South Sudan or IOM. This map is for planning purposes only. IOM cannot guarantee this map is error free and therefore accepts no liability for consequential and indirect damages arising from its use.
    [Show full text]
  • Partner Presence and Interventions in Warrap State A14062012-1
    FSL Cluster Partner Presence and Interventions in Warrap State A14062012-1 27°0'0"E 30°0'0"E Disclaimer The boundaries and and names shown and the designations used on this map do not Abyei imply offical endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations or the Government U of South Sudan. For any comment please contact: F S L - c l u st e r- s s d @ fa o . o r g n it Data sources y H! * Administrative boundaries were obtained courtesy of IMU OCHA; State capitals * Kind of interventions are provided by FSL Cluster partners ! H Undetermined boundary 13 Bentiu Twic Primary roads N N " " 0 0 ' Secondary roads ' 0 0 ° ° 9 l 9 za ha Gogrial East Tertiary roads l G r e ah Rivers B ern H! rth Abyei administrative area No Aweil t s International boundary e 6 11 Warrap W l South Sudan states a i 8 r g South Sudan counties J o o G n Waterbg ody/marsh l H! Tonj North e Kuajok Grazingi areas Type of intervention Food assistance and livestock interventions Tonj East Food assistance, livestock, income & employment, value addition/markets, and Intervening Partners' by County H! 5 agriculture interventions County Livestock Gogrial East FAO, VSF Suisse Wau Gogrial West FAO, VSF Suisse * Figures indicate number of partners Tonj East VSF Belgium, FAO, VSF Suisse Tonj North VSF Belgium, FAO, VSF Suisse Tonj South FAO, VSF Suisse Scale 1: 665,360 Twic FAO, VSF Suisse 7 Map Paper Size: A1 ¬ Map created: June 2012 County Income/Employment Value Addition/Markets Gogrial East FAO, VSF Germany VSF Germany Gogrial West NRC, FAO, NPA FAO Sudan Tonj East Tonj South
    [Show full text]
  • Secretary-General's Report on South Sudan (September 2020)
    United Nations S/2020/890 Security Council Distr.: General 8 September 2020 Original: English Situation in South Sudan Report of the Secretary-General I. Introduction 1. The present report is submitted pursuant to Security Council resolution 2514 (2020), by which the Council extended the mandate of the United Nations Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS) until 15 March 2021 and requested me to report to the Council on the implementation of the Mission’s mandate every 90 days. It covers political and security developments between 1 June and 31 August 2020, the humanitarian and human rights situation and progress made in the implementation of the Mission’s mandate. II. Political and economic developments 2. On 17 June, the President of South Sudan, Salva Kiir, and the First Vice- President, Riek Machar, reached a decision on responsibility-sharing ratios for gubernatorial and State positions, ending a three-month impasse on the allocations of States. Central Equatoria, Eastern Equatoria, Lakes, Northern Bahr el-Ghazal, Warrap and Unity were allocated to the incumbent Transitional Government of National Unity; Upper Nile, Western Bahr el-Ghazal and Western Equatoria were allocated to the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement/Army in Opposition (SPLM/A-IO); and Jonglei was allocated to the South Sudan Opposition Alliance. The Other Political Parties coalition was not allocated a State, as envisioned in the Revitalized Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in the Republic of South Sudan, in which the coalition had been guaranteed 8 per cent of the positions. 3. On 29 June, the President appointed governors of 8 of the 10 States and chief administrators of the administrative areas of Abyei, Ruweng and Pibor.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com09/24/2021 04:59:59AM Via Free Access “They Are Now Community Police” 411
    international journal on minority and group rights 22 (2015) 410-434 brill.com/ijgr “They Are Now Community Police”: Negotiating the Boundaries and Nature of the Government in South Sudan through the Identity of Militarised Cattle-keepers Naomi Pendle PhD Candidate, London School of Economics, London, UK [email protected] Abstract Armed, cattle-herding men in Africa are often assumed to be at a relational and spatial distance from the ‘legitimate’ armed forces of the government. The vision constructed of the South Sudanese government in 2005 by the Comprehensive Peace Agreement removed legitimacy from non-government armed groups including localised, armed, defence forces that protected communities and cattle. Yet, militarised cattle-herding men of South Sudan have had various relationships with the governing Sudan Peoples’ Liberation Movement/Army over the last thirty years, blurring the government – non government boundary. With tens of thousands killed since December 2013 in South Sudan, questions are being asked about options for justice especially for governing elites. A contextual understanding of the armed forces and their relationship to gov- ernment over time is needed to understand the genesis and apparent legitimacy of this violence. Keywords South Sudan – policing – vigilantism – transitional justice – war crimes – security © NAOMI PENDLE, 2015 | doi 10.1163/15718115-02203006 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial 4.0 (CC-BY-NC 4.0) License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Downloaded from Brill.com09/24/2021 04:59:59AM via free access “they Are Now Community Police” 411 1 Introduction1 On 15 December 2013, violence erupted in Juba, South Sudan among Nuer sol- diers of the Presidential Guard.
    [Show full text]
  • Wartime Trade and the Reshaping of Power in South Sudan Learning from the Market of Mayen Rual South Sudan Customary Authorities Project
    SOUTH SUDAN CUSTOMARY AUTHORITIES pROjECT WARTIME TRADE AND THE RESHAPING OF POWER IN SOUTH SUDAN LEARNING FROM THE MARKET OF MAYEN RUAL SOUTH SUDAN customary authorities pROjECT Wartime Trade and the Reshaping of Power in South Sudan Learning from the market of Mayen Rual NAOMI PENDLE AND CHirrilo MADUT ANEI Published in 2018 by the Rift Valley Institute PO Box 52771 GPO, 00100 Nairobi, Kenya 107 Belgravia Workshops, 159/163 Marlborough Road, London N19 4NF, United Kingdom THE RIFT VALLEY INSTITUTE (RVI) The Rift Valley Institute (www.riftvalley.net) works in eastern and central Africa to bring local knowledge to bear on social, political and economic development. THE AUTHORS Naomi Pendle is a Research Fellow in the Firoz Lalji Centre for Africa, London School of Economics. Chirrilo Madut Anei is a graduate of the University of Bahr el Ghazal and is an emerging South Sudanese researcher. SOUTH SUDAN CUSTOMARY AUTHORITIES PROJECT RVI’s South Sudan Customary Authorities Project seeks to deepen the understand- ing of the changing role of chiefs and traditional authorities in South Sudan. The SSCA Project is supported by the Swiss Government. CREDITS RVI EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: Mark Bradbury RVI ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR OF RESEARCH AND COMMUNICATIONS: Cedric Barnes RVI SOUTH SUDAN PROGRAMME MANAGER: Anna Rowett RVI SENIOR PUBLICATIONS AND PROGRAMME MANAGER: Magnus Taylor EDITOR: Kate McGuinness DESIGN: Lindsay Nash MAPS: Jillian Luff,MAPgrafix ISBN 978-1-907431-56-2 COVER: Chief Morris Ngor RIGHTS Copyright © Rift Valley Institute 2018 Cover image © Silvano Yokwe Alison Text and maps published under Creative Commons License Attribution-Noncommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 Available for free download from www.riftvalley.net Printed copies are available from Amazon and other online retailers.
    [Show full text]
  • South Sudan - Crisis Fact Sheet #2, Fiscal Year (Fy) 2019 December 7, 2018
    SOUTH SUDAN - CRISIS FACT SHEET #2, FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2019 DECEMBER 7, 2018 NUMBERS AT USAID/OFDA1 FUNDING HIGHLIGHTS A GLANCE BY SECTOR IN FY 2018 Relief actor records at least 150 GBV cases in Bentiu during a 12-day period 5% 7% 20% UN records two aid worker deaths, 60 7 million 7% Estimated People in South humanitarian access incidents in October 10% Sudan Requiring Humanitarian USAID/FFP partner reaches 2.3 million Assistance 19% 2018 Humanitarian Response Plan – people with assistance in October December 2017 15% 17% HUMANITARIAN FUNDING Logistics Support & Relief Commodities (20%) Water, Sanitation & Hygiene (19%) FOR THE SOUTH SUDAN RESPONSE 6.1 million Health (17%) Nutrition (15%) USAID/OFDA $135,187,409 Estimated People in Need of Protection (10%) Food Assistance in South Sudan Agriculture & Food Security (7%) USAID/FFP $402,253,743 IPC Technical Working Group – Humanitarian Coordination & Info Management (7%) September 2018 Shelter & Settlements (5%) 3 State/PRM $91,553,826 USAID/FFP2 FUNDING $628,994,9784 2 million BY MODALITY IN FY 2018 1% TOTAL USG HUMANITARIAN FUNDING FOR THE SOUTH SUDAN CRISIS IN FY 2018 Estimated IDPs in 84% 9% 5% South Sudan OCHA – November 8, 2018 U.S. In-Kind Food Aid (84%) 1% $3,760,121,951 Local & Regional Food Procurement (9%) TOTAL USG HUMANITARIAN FUNDING FOR THE Complementary Services (5%) SOUTH SUDAN RESPONSE IN FY 2014–2018, Cash Transfers for Food (1%) INCLUDING FUNDING FOR SOUTH SUDANESE Food Vouchers (1%) REFUGEES IN NEIGHBORING COUNTRIES 194,900 Estimated Individuals Seeking Refuge at UNMISS Bases KEY DEVELOPMENTS UNMISS – November 15, 2018 During a 12-day period in late November, non-governmental organization (NGO) Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) recorded at least 150 gender-based violence (GBV) cases in Unity State’s Bentiu town, representing a significant increase from the approximately 2.2 million 100 GBV cases that MSF recorded in Bentiu between January and October.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 South Sudan Education Statistical Booklet
    Education Statistics for Western Equatoria Government of Republic of South Sudan Ministry of General Education and Instruction State Statistical Booklet Western Equatoria Republic of South Sudan Ministry of General Education and Instruction Directorate of Planning and Budgeting Department of Data and Statistics Education Management Information Systems Unit Juba, South Sudan www.goss.org © Ministry of General Education and Instruction 2012 This publication may be used as a part or as a whole, provided that the MoGEI is acknowledged as the source of information. This publication has been produced with financial and technical support from UNICEF, FHI360, and SCiSS. For inquiries or requests, please use the following contact information: George Mogga / Director for Planning and Budgeting / [email protected] Fahim Akbar / Senior EMIS Advisor / [email protected] Moses Kong / EMIS Officer / [email protected] Paulino Kamba / EMIS Officer / [email protected] Joanes Odero / Programme Associate / [email protected] Deng Chol Deng / Programme Associate / [email protected] 1 Foreword Message from Minister Joseph Ukel Abango On behalf of the Ministry of General Education and Instruction (MoGEI), I am pleased for the fifth education census data for the Republic of South Sudan (RSS). The collection and consolidation of the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of Learning Spaces (RALS) conducted in 2006. RALS covered less than half of the primary schools operating in the country at the time. By 2011, data from pre-primary, primary, secondary, an Alternative Education Systems (AES), and technical and vocational education and training (TVET) schools, centres, and institutes were collected.
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict and Crisis in South Sudan's Equatoria
    SPECIAL REPORT NO. 493 | APRIL 2021 UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE www.usip.org Conflict and Crisis in South Sudan’s Equatoria By Alan Boswell Contents Introduction ...................................3 Descent into War ..........................4 Key Actors and Interests ............ 9 Conclusion and Recommendations ...................... 16 Thomas Cirillo, leader of the Equatoria-based National Salvation Front militia, addresses the media in Rome on November 2, 2019. (Photo by Andrew Medichini/AP) Summary • In 2016, South Sudan’s war expand- Equatorians—a collection of diverse South Sudan’s transitional period. ed explosively into the country’s minority ethnic groups—are fighting • On a national level, conflict resolu- southern region, Equatoria, trig- for more autonomy, local or regional, tion should pursue shared sover- gering a major refugee crisis. Even and a remedy to what is perceived eignty among South Sudan’s con- after the 2018 peace deal, parts of as (primarily) Dinka hegemony. stituencies and regions, beyond Equatoria continue to be active hot • Equatorian elites lack the external power sharing among elites. To spots for national conflict. support to viably pursue their ob- resolve underlying grievances, the • The war in Equatoria does not fit jectives through violence. The gov- political process should be expand- neatly into the simplified narratives ernment in Juba, meanwhile, lacks ed to include consultations with of South Sudan’s war as a power the capacity and local legitimacy to local community leaders. The con- struggle for the center; nor will it be definitively stamp out the rebellion. stitutional reform process of South addressed by peacebuilding strate- Both sides should pursue a nego- Sudan’s current transitional period gies built off those precepts.
    [Show full text]
  • 09.04.20 South Sudan Program
    South Sudan USG Response to the Complex Emergency COUNTRYWIDE PROGRAMS Response Sectors: SUDAN Agriculture Economic Recovery, Market Systems, and Livelihoods Education Food Assistance CHAD Health Humanitarian Coordination and Information Management Humanitarian Policy, Studies, Analysis, or Application Multipurpose Cash Assistance Logistics Support and Relief Commodities Abyei Area- UPPER NILE Disputed* Nutrition Protection NORTHERN UNITY Shelter and Settlements CENTRAL BAHR EL GHAZAL Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene AFRICAN WARRAP REPUBLIC WESTERN BAHR EL GHAZAL JONGLEI LAKES Response Partners: ETHIOPIA AAH/USA Mentor Initiative WESTERN EQUATORIA ACTED Mercy Corps EASTERN EQUATORIA ALIMA Nonviolent Peaceforce ARC NRC CENTRAL CONCERN OCHA EQUATORIA CRS Relief International Danish Refugee Council (DRC) Samaritan's Purse Doctors of the World SCF FAO Tearfund ICRC UNHCR IFRC UNICEF IMC VSF/G UGANDA KENYA Internews WFP (UNHAS) IOM WFP DEMOCRATIC IRC WHO REPUBLIC Lutheran World Federation World Vision, Inc. (USA) MEDAIR, SWI WRI OF THE CONGO * Final sovereignty status of Abyei Area pending negotiations between South Sudan and Sudan. IDPs in South Sudan Estimated Food Security Levels # By State " UNMISS IDP Site SUDAN THROUGH SEPTEMBER 2020 # Malakal UNMISS 1: Minimal 4: Emergency 60,000 - 100,000 IDP Site ~813,300 base: 27,900 100,000 - 150,000 Host Communities # 2: Stressed 5: Famine 150,000 - 200,000 ## 3: Crisis No Data Abyei Area - 200,000 - 250,000 Bentiu UNMISS Disputed # Source: FEWS NET, South Sudan Outlook, August - September 2020 base: 111,800 ~9,300 ## ## # # ~233,800# # ## # ##"# # # #"# # ### # #~76,400 # # # ~226,000 # # # # # # # ### Wau UNMISS # ETHIOPIA ##~246,700 # base: 10,000 #"## # ~71,200 ~346,300 # # ~207,200 # ~187,200 # # Bor C.A.R. UNMISS # ~2,600 #"# base: # # 1,900 ## # ~70,900 ## # # # ~60,100 Map reflects FEWS NET # ##"# # # # food security projections # Refugees in Neighboring Countries #~220,800 # at the area level.
    [Show full text]