PoC Site Flow Monitoring January – March 2021

IOM’s Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM) continued operating Displacement Site Flow Monitoring (DSFM) at the gates of Malakal Protection of Civilians Methodology: (PoC) site. During this period, 3,073 interviews were conducted representing 4,544 individual movements in to and out of the site. There was a 6.0 per Displacement Site Flow Monitoring (DSFM) involves cent decrease in surveyed day movements relative to October – December 2020, most of which are for farming / fishing (23.0%) and other livelihood interviewing a cross-section of persons passing through the site’s entry and exit points. DTM aims to understand mobility activities. Individuals embark on longer temporary travel primarily to visit friends or family (47.0%) and for farming / fishing (12.0%), with 36.0 per cent dynamics and reasons underpinning movement in and out of temporary travels lasting more than six months. Women and girls are slightly over-represented among both same day and temporary travelers. The of the site to provide partners with a better understanding number of surveyed new arrivals, 48.0 per cent of whom intend to stay more than six months, increased by a third relative to the previous quarter of same day movement, temporary travel, new entry and permanent exit. Interviews are conducted seven days a week (309 compared to 229). Common reasons for new arrivals were to join family (34.0%) or because their homes had been destroyed by natural disasters from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. DSFM provides indicative traveller profiles (14.0%). Surveyed permanent exits increased from 30 to 67 individuals, 82.0 per cent of whom traveled to join family in areas of return or relocation. rather than comprehensive or representative estimates.

Biometric Registration 30,468 ind. (9,034 households) 14,185 (47%) Male 16,283 (53%) Female

Same Day Travel n = 3,386 Temporary Travel n = 782 New Arrivals n = 309 Permanent Exits n = 6 7

40% 60% 44% 56% 44% 56% 39% 61% Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female

Most common reason for Most common reason for Most common reason: Most common reason: Farming/ fishing Visit friends/ family movement into the site: To be with family movement out of the site: To be with family

Top reasons for same day movement Top reasons for temporary movement Top reasons for new arrivals Top reasons for permanent exit Farming/ fishing Visit friends/family To be with family To be with family 23% 11% 12% 47% 18% 29% 34% 14% 21% 82% 28% 54% Collect firewood Farming/ fishing Destroyed home because of natural disaster Looking for education opportunities 17% 1% 16% 12% 9.2% 2.3% 14% 8% 6% 12% 6% 6% Other livelihood activity Health services Hunger because of natural disaster Looking for livelihood/work opportunities 15% 8% 7% 8% 2.3% 5.5% 12% 6% 6% 3% 3% Make / sell charcoal Attempt to return home Healthcare generally Looking for education opportunites 10% 6% 4% 6% 2% 4% 11% 5% 6% 2% 1% Sand / soil Other livelihood activity Visit Family Leaving due to uncomfortable living conditions 8% 3% 5% 5% 3% 2% 8% 3% 5% 1% 1% Reasons continued; Reasons continued: Reasons continued: Access to services (3%), healthcare (3%), visit friends/ family To buy things (7%), visit friends / family (5%), washing clothes Collect firewood (5%), make / sell charcoal (3%), employ- No other reasons were recorded. (2%), not safe/insecurity because of conflict (2%), education (4%), education (3%), and other (8%). ment (3%), sand / soil (2%), and other (9%). (2%), other livelihood (1%), and other (8%). Daily gate count Intended period of stay / time spent away Intended period of stay at the site Nature & top destinations of permanent exit During the outbreak of COVID-19, DTM conducted daily Probably more than 6 months Probably more than 6 months Nature of % of permanent Main locations by gate counts for individual movements in and out of the site. 36% 22% 14% 48% 20% 28% Destination exit nature of destination Daily average movement from January to March 2021 are as 1 - 7 days (stayed at least one night) 2 - 4 weeks indicated in the table below. Former Home 73% Fashoda 29% 5% 24% 26% 14% 12% Month Entry Average Exit Average Net Flow 2 - 3 months 2 - 3 months New Home, dif- 19% Jabal Aulia (SDN) 18% 7% 11% 17% 6% 11% ferent area January 4,475 4,538 -63 4 - 6 months 2 - 4 weeks Former area but 15% 7% 4% 3% 4% Kosti (SDN) 8% 8% new home February 4,570 4,561 +9 4 - 6 months 1 - 7 days Other Displace- 2% 2% 2% 2% 4% - March 4,204 4,058 +146 ment site Begin Temporary travel Return from temporary travel Male Female 1Disclaimer: [Rounding] Percentages may not add up to 100% as a result of rounding error. Malakal PoC Site Flow Monitoring January – March 2021 Movement Dynamics

Return from temporary travel n = 446 Embarking on temporary journey n = 336

Return from Temp orary Travel Sinkat Begin Temporary Travel River Nile From Temporary Travel Red Sea Begin Temporary Travel Khartoum North sala Northern Counties of origin Sharq El Nile Kas Counties of intended destinations 1 - 2 1 - 2 Um Durman 3 - 4 River Nile 3 - 6 Jabal Aulia 5 - 6 Malakal 43% 7 - 9North Darfur North Malakal 19% 7 - 11 la 10 - 20 Greater Wad Madani sa G y s e ra 12 - 178 Sharq El Nile a 21 - 36 d Tig K Rabak a CNoourntthry Darfur Um Durman G S u d a n re e Fangak 13% Country Kosti S f Fashoda 17% Jabal Aulia da W en AdminS 1u d a n North Kordofan Admin 1 n S u d a n re e El Jabalian ar f s A

t r Ti m gr K ay u e l Eastern Sennar f h Panyikang 8% o i Khartoum (SDN) 12% Sennar r E a a r N a r Rabak d W Kosti S s Renk a D e t o e n Abu Jubaiha e na D f u El Jabalian h l s r a t a t r n B K u r Khartoum (SDN) 8% V Panyikang 11% u f o Melut f u

a r E or S r

k a a Fashoda do s Renk a D t Amhara g D Abu Jubaiha f h a U Panyikang a a Fashoda 5% Fangak 7% n Longochuk V r f n FangakCanal/Pigi out ur MelutUpper Nile W a i t S Luakpiny/Nasir ka y Fashoda Maban a o r t g Ayod Oromia t r a U Panyikang a E tth ii o p ii a Longochuk 3% o Renk 6% Longochuk p n Fangak W K i Akobo - Northern Bahr el Ghazal t y E t h i o p i a e o a E t h i o p i a Jonglei t t r r u

ot a a p n tt rra ll A ff rr ii c a n R e p u b ll ii c K Um Durman (SDN) 3% Lak Rabak (SDN) 5% H es - Western Bahr el Ghazal e Jonglei Snnpr ut W t r a l A a f r i c a n R e p u b l i c e t r a l A f r i c a n R e p u b l i c L ou ster S o u t h S u d a n H akes om n Eq Snnpr Other 17% Mb uato Kosti (SDN) 5. ria toria ou S o u tt h S u d a n Equa m tern Mbo Central Eas T toria u qua r M Other 18% E k Central EquatoriaJuba tern Ha a Eas na Oromia Bas-Uele ut-U a r a e n s k le a D e m o cBrraastt-iUice lRe e p u b lliic Ho affu Ct o n g o rK e n yMa a b -Uele u arsab D e m o c rr a ttii c R e p u b ll ii c o ff C o n g o U g a n d a it U g a n d a T it K e n y a The maps above do not include same-day travel, which tends to be limited to the immediate surroundings of the site.

New arrivals n = 309 Permanent exit n = 6 7

New Entry Permanent Exit Kassala New Entry Sharq El Nile Permanent Exit Kassala 1 Um Durman Counties of origin Um Durman Jabal Aulia 1 Jabal Aulia Counties of intended destinations 2 North Kordofan North Kordofan ira North Darfur G 2 North Darfur az 3 - 4 e l G G da y 3 E e igra Fangak 22% da ray Fashoda 36% 5 - 7 re T 4 r Tig Rabak f Rabak e 8 S u d a n f S u d a n W Kosti S 5 - 10 S u d a n e W S nna S u d a n Kosti en e na Country r e s Country r Panyikang 19% s Panyikang 12% t

r t K r Admin 1 K u S e Admin 1 u e f out l i f l r E or Manyo i h A r E or a K a N a A s do o a N r Renk m do D d s t U Renk m of D Juba 7% t U Renk 9% D a ue f n h Abu Jubaiha h D ue p l f h a h p l a a a pe a n a B r pe r n B f a r r out f a V ur r out V ur r a S N a S N ka Fashoda ka Fashoda i Khartoum (SDN) 6% Luakpiny/Nasir 9% i g l g l a e U Panyikang a e E tth ii o p ii a U Panyikang E tth ii o p ii a n Fangak n W Fangak i Luakpiny/Nasir W i Luakpiny/Nasir t Northern Bahr el Ghazal t y Northern Bahr el Ghazal a y NyirolUlang a Nyirol r ia Ayod Orom Um Durman (SDN) 6% r ia Jabal Aulia (SDN) 9% r Orom r a a p to o p ot Western Bahr el Ghazal ott Western Bahr el Ghazal e-K Jonglei -K Jonglei C e n t r a l uAt f r i c a n R e p u b l i c ute C e n t rHa al A f r i c a n R e p u b l i c Ayod 6% C e n tt rrHa all A ff rr ii c a n R e p u b ll ii c Fangak 6% Lakes Snnpr Snnpr S o u tt h S u d a n S o u t h S u d a n ou Kosti (SDN) 6% ou S o u t h S u d a n Malakal 4% bom m M Western Equatoria ria Mbo Western Equatoria ria quato quato Central EquatoriaJuba rn E rn E Easte Rabak (SDN) 4% Easte Kosti (SDN) 4% T T u u r M r M Bas-Uele Aringa k Bas-Uele k a le a Haut-Uele a r Haut-Ue a r na s na s Arua Municipality a a a b Other 24% a b Other 11% l it l it ga U g a n d a ga D e m o c r a t i c R e p u b l i c o f C o n g o U g a n d a on D e m o c rr a ttii c R e p u b ll ii c o ff C o n g o U g a n d a K e n y a on D e m o c r a t i c R e p u b l i c o f C o n g o K e n y a M M Tshopo Ituri Tshopo Ituri