DOCSLIB.ORG

Publication: Platypus and Parliament

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Publication: Platypus and Parliament Bibliography ALDONS, MALCOLM. (2001) ‘Responsible, Representative and Accountable Government,’ Australian Journal of Public Administration, v. 60, n. 1. ARCHER, JEFFREY, AND GRAHAM MADDOX. (1976) ‘The 1975 Constitutional Crisis in Australia,’ Journal of Commonwealth and Comparative Politics, v. 14. Reprinted in Woodward et al. (1985). ARCHER, J.A. (1980) ‘The Theory of Responsible Government in Britain and Australia,’ in Weller and Jaensch (1980). ARONEY, NICHOLAS. (2002) ‘Imagining a Federal Commonwealth: Australian Conceptions of Federalism, 1890–1901,’ Federal Law Review, v. 30, n. 2. BANNON, JOHN. (1997) ‘Towards Federation: the Role of the Smaller Colonies,’ Papers on Parliament n. 30, November 1997. BARTLETT, ANDREW. (1999) ‘A Squeeze on the Balance of Power: Using Senate “Reform” to Dilute Democracy,’ in Sawer and Miskin (1999). BARWICK, GARFIELD. (1983) Sir John Did His Duty. Serendip Publications. BAUME, PETER. (1991) ‘Senate Estimates Committees—Do These Watchdogs Bite or Only Bark?’ Papers on Parliament n. 12, September 1991. BEAHAN, MICHAEL. (1996) ‘Majorities and Minorities: Evolutionary Trends in the Australian Senate,’ Papers on Parliament n. 27, March 1996. BEAN, CLIVE. (1988) ‘Politics and the Public: Mass Attitudes Towards the Australian Political System,’ in Jonathan Kelly and Clive Bean (eds) (1988) Australian Attitudes. Allen & Unwin. BEAN, CLIVE, AND MARTIN P. WATTENBERG. (1998) ‘Attitudes Toward Divided Government and Ticket-Splitting in Australia and the United States,’ Australian Journal of Political Science, v. 33, n. 1. BEAN, CLIVE, AND IAN MCALLISTER. (2002) ‘From Impossibility to Certainty: Explaining the Coalition’s Victory in 2001,’ in John Warhurst and Marian Simms (eds) 2001: the Centenary Election. University of Queensland Press. BENNETT, SCOTT. (1971) The Making of the Commonwealth. Cassell Australia. —— (1996) Winning and Losing: Australian National Elections. Melbourne University Press. BLACK, JOHN, MICHAEL MACKLIN, AND CHRIS PUPLICK. (1992) ‘How Parliament Works in Practice,’ Papers on Parliament n. 14 February 1992. BLEWETT, NEAL. (1993) ‘Parliamentary Reform: Challenge for the House of Representatives,’ Australian Quarterly, v. 65, n. 3. BLICK, BILL. (1992) ‘Accountability, the Parliament and the Executive,’ Papers on Parliament n. 18, December 1992. 370 PLATYPUS AND PARLIAMENT BOLTON, GEOFFREY. (1962) ‘The Choice of the Speaker in Australian Parliaments,’ Parliamentary Affairs, v. 15. BONGIORNO, PAUL, MICHELLE GRATTAN, AND MELISSA LANGERMAN. (1999) ‘Reporting the Senate: Three Perspectives,’ in Sawer and Miskin (1999). BRENNAN, GEOFFREY. (1994) ‘Australian Parliamentary Democracy: One Cheer for the Status Quo,’ Papers on Parliament n. 22, February 1994. —— (1998–99) ‘The “Unrepresentative Swill” Feel Their Oats,’ Policy, v. 14, n. 4. —— (1999) ‘The Senate and Proportional Representation: Some Concluding Observations,’ in Sawer and Miskin (1999). BROOME, RICHARD. (2002) Aboriginal Australians. (3rd ed.) Allen & Unwin. BROWNING, H.O. (1985) 1975 Crisis: an Historical View. Hale & Iremonger. BRYCE, JAMES. (1905) Constitutions. Oxford University Press. BUTLER, DAVID. (1973) The Canberra Model. St. Martin’s Press. BUTTON, JOHN. (1980) ‘Federal Parliament: Decision Making in a Bizarre Working Environment,’ in Mayer and Nelson (1980). —— (1992) ‘The Role of the Leader of the Government in the Senate,’ Papers on Parliament n. 14, February 1992. CABINET HANDBOOK (5TH ED.) (2000) Department of the Prime Minster and Cabinet. [www.dpmc.gov.au/pdfs/cabineted5.pdf] CHANEY, FRED. (1988) ‘Bicameralism Australian Style: Governing Without Control of the Upper House,’ The Parliamentarian, v. 69, n. 3. —— (1999) ‘Should Parliament Be Abolished?’ in Sawer and Miskin (1999). CHILDS, BRUCE. (1992) ‘The Truth About Parliamentary Committees,’ Papers on Parliament n. 18, December 1992. CLARK, MANNING. (1981) A Short History of Australia. The Macmillan Company of Australia. CODY, HOWARD. (1988) ‘Australian Small State MPs and Senators as Representatives,’ Australian Quarterly, v. 60, n. 2. —— (1996) ‘Australia’s Senate and Senate Reform in Canada,’ Papers on Parliament n. 27, March 1996. COGHILL, KEN AND DESPINA BABBAGE. (1991) ‘Seating in Legislatures,’ Legislative Studies, v. 5, n. 2. COLLINS, HUGH. (1985) ‘Political Ideology in Australia: the Distinctiveness of a Benthamite Society,’ in Stephen R. Graubard (ed.) (1985) Australia: the Daedalus Symposium. Angus and Robertson. COMANS, C.K. (1985) ‘Constitution, Section 57—Further Questions,’ Federal Law Review, v. 15, n. 3. CONSTITUTION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA [Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900], as amended to 1977. Various editions; available online at www.aph.gov.au/Senate/general/Constitution/index. htm COONAN, HELEN. (1999a) ‘“Survival of the Fittest”: Future Directions of the Senate,’ in Sawer and Miskin (1999). —— (1999b) ‘Safeguard or Handbrake on Democracy?’ Address to the Sydney Institute, 3 February 1999. Published in revised form in Costar (2000). BIBLIOGRAPHY 371 COSTAR, BRIAN (ED.). (2000) Deadlock or Democracy? The Future of the Senate. University of New South Wales Press. th CRISP. L.F. (1983) Australian National Government (5 ed.). Longman Cheshire. DALE, WILLIAM. (1993) ‘The Making and Remaking of Commonwealth Constitutions,’ International and Comparative Law Quarterly, v. 42, n. 1. DAVIS, S.R. (1983) ‘What Price Upper Houses in Australia?’ in Reid (1983). DENNING, WARREN. (1946) Inside Parliament. Australasian Publishing Co. DETMOLD, M.J. (1985) The Australian Commonwealth: a Fundamental Analysis of Its Constitution. Law Book Company. DISNEY, JULIAN, AND J.R. NETHERCOTE (EDS). (1996) The House on Capital Hill: Parliament, Politics and Power in the National Capital. Federation Press. EDWARDS, J.E. (1943) ‘The Powers of the Australian Senate in Relation to Money Bills,’ Australian Quarterly, v. 15, n. 3. —— (1948) ‘P.R. : Application of the System in Electing the Senate of the Commonwealth of Australia,’ Journal of the Society of Clerks-at-the- Table in Empire Parliaments, v. XVII. ELLICOTT, R.J. (1977) ‘The Blocking of the Budget and Dismissal of the Government: Commentaries,’ in Evans (1977). ELLINGHAUS, M.P., ADRIAN BRADBROOK AND A.J. DUGGAN (EDS). (1989) The Emergence of Australian Law. Butterworths. ELLIOTT, CLEAVER. (1997) ‘Less than Optimal Outcomes: Fraser and Keating Without the Numbers,’ Legislative Studies, v. 11, n. 2. EMY, HUGH. (1974) The Politics of Australian Democracy. Macmillan. —— (1996) ‘The Mandate, the Senate, and Responsible Government,’ Australia and World Affairs, n. 30. —— (1997) ‘The Mandate and Responsible Government,’ Australian Journal of Political Science, v. 32, n. 1. EPSTEIN, LEON. (1976) ‘Australian Bicameralism: a Comparative Perspective,’ Politics, v. 11, n. 1. EVANS, GARETH. (1975) ‘The Senate’s Rights Can be Wrong,’ The Australian, 29 October 1975, p. 11. Reprinted in Mayer and Nelson (1976). EVANS, GARETH (ED.). (1977) Labor and the Constitution 1972–1975. Heinemann. EVANS, HARRY. (1982) ‘Australia and the “Westminster System,”‘ The Table, v. 50. —— (1984) ‘Party Government Versus Constitutional Government,’ Australian Quarterly, v. 56, n. 3. —— (1992a) ‘Parliamentary Reform: New Directions and Possibilities for Reform of Parliamentary Processes,’ Papers on Parliament n. 14, February 1992. —— (1992b) ‘Parliament: an Unreformable Institution?’ Papers on Parliament n. 18, December 1992. —— (1993a) ‘Party Government: the Australian Disease and Australian Cures,’ Legislative Studies, v. 7, n. 2. 372 PLATYPUS AND PARLIAMENT —— (1993b) ‘Constitution, Section 53—Amendments and Requests— Disagreements Between the Houses,’ Papers on Parliament n. 19, May 1993. —— (1994) ‘Essentials of Republican Legislatures: Distributed Majorities and Legislative Control,’. Papers on Parliament n. 24, September 1994. —— (1995) ‘Restructuring the Senate’s Committee System,’ Canberra Bulletin of Public Administration, n. 78. —— (1997a) ‘Federalism and the Role of the Senate.’ Paper presented at the Samuel Griffith Society Conference, Canberra. [www.aph.gov. au/senate/pubs/griffith.htm] —— (1997b) ‘Government and Parliament,’ in Gwynneth Singleton (ed.). The Second Keating Government. Centre for Research in Public Sector Management, University of Canberra and Institute of Public Administration Australia. —— (1998) ‘The Other Metropolis: the Australian Founders’ Knowledge of America,’ The New Federalist, n. 2. —— (1999) ‘Accountability Versus Government Control: the Effect of Proportional Representation,’ in Sawer and Miskin (1999); also published in Costar (2000). —— (2000a) ‘The Howard Government and the Parliament,’ in Singleton (2000). —— (2000b) ‘The Australian Constitution and the 1911 Myth,’ The House Magazine, 6 September. Reprinted in Murray (2001). —— (2001) ‘An Elected President for an Australian Republic: Problems and Solutions,’ in Murray (2001). FARRELL, DAVID, AND IAN MCALLISTER. (1995) ‘Legislative Recruitment to Upper Houses: the Australian Senate and House of Representatives Compared,’ Journal of Legislative Studies, v. 1, n. 2. FAULKNER, JOHN. (1999) ‘A Labor Perspective on Senate Reform,’ in Sawer and Miskin (1999): 119–129; also published in Costar (2000). FUSARO, ANTHONY. (1966) ‘The Australian Senate as a House of Review: Another Look,’ Australian Journal of Politics and History, v. 12. —— (1967) ‘The Effect of Proportional Representation on Voting in the Australian Senate,’ Parliamentary Affairs, vol. 20, n. 4. GALLIGAN, BRIAN. (1980a) ‘The Founders’ Design and Intentions Regarding
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Unit 7 Political Parties and Pressure Groups in Australia
    UNIT 7 POLITICAL PARTIES AND PRESSURE GROUPS IN AUSTRALIA Structure 7.1 Introduction 7.2 Objectives 7.3 Antecedents of the Australian Party System 7.4 Compulsory Voting and Party System 7.4.1 Preferential Voting System and Political Parties 7.4.2 Proportional Representation System and Political Parties 7.5 The Liberal Party 7.6 The Australian Labour Party 7.7 The National Party or the Nationals 7.8 The Minor Parties 7.8.1 The Australian Democrats 7.8.2 The Greens 7.8.3 The Independents 7.8.4 One Nation 7.9 Electoral System and the Changing Dynamics of the Australian Party System 7.10 Pressure Groups 7.11 Summary 7.12 Exercises Suggested Readings 7.1 INTRODUCTION Political parties are almost an unavoidable feature of democracies, whatever may be the reasons. In fact, one could cite many reasons; but may be it is because political parties enable ordinary citizens to exercise some kind of influence-even if it be only during election times-over the political elite that parties are an inescapable reality of democracies. This is notwithstanding the fact that political parties are in themselves quite imperfect an institution in a democracy, and politicians are generally held in low esteem by the citizens. This here is the paradox of contemporary party- based democracies-both old and new. Citizens do not have any particular liking for parties and politicians; but once it is election time, the same citizens vote for them. 7.2 OBJECTIVES After reading this unit, you should be able to: z describe the antecedents of the Australian party system; 74 z delineate the voting system in Australia; z identify the major and minor parties in Australia; z understand the changing dynamics of the Australian party system; and z define the role of pressure groups in Australian politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Abolition of the Upper House Community Engagement – Updated 27 March 2001
    Abolition of the Upper House Community Engagement – Updated 27 March 2001 THE ABOLITION OF THE UPPER HOUSE IN QUEENSLAND INTRODUCTION Unicameral legislatures, or legislatures with only one chamber, are uncommon in democracies. It is usually considered that two chambers are necessary for government, and this is the case for the United Kingdom, Canada (at the Federal level) and the United States (Federally, and for all states except Nebraska.) However, some countries, usually small ones, are unicameral. Israel, Denmark, Finland, Luxembourg, Sweden, and Greece have only one chamber. All the Canadian Provinces, all the Malaysian States and some of the Indian ones, including Assam, are unicameral. Other single-chambered legislatures in the Commonwealth include New Zealand, Ghana, Cyprus, Sierra Leone, Tanzania, Uganda, Malta, Malawi, Zambia, Gambia, Guyana, Singapore, Botswana, Zimbabwe and (Western) Samoa. In Australia, the Federal Government has two chambers, as do the governments of all the states, except Queensland. At its separation from New South Wales in 1859, Queensland had two houses of Parliament, the Legislative Assembly and the Legislative Council. But in a move unique in Australian history, the Legislative Council abolished itself. EARLY DAYS OF THE LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL, 1860-1890 Queensland, separated from New South Wales in 1859, was the only colony to have a Parliament from its inception. When the Parliament of Queensland was first promulgated in 1860, there were two houses of Parliament. The first members of the Upper House, the Legislative Council, were appointed for five years by the Governor of New South Wales, so that Queensland would not be left permanently with nominees from the Governor of another colony.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Aspects of the Federal Political Career of Andrew Fisher
    SOME ASPECTS OF THE FEDERAL POLITICAL CAREER OF ANDREW FISHER By EDWARD WIL.LIAM I-IUMPHREYS, B.A. Hans. MASTER OF ARTS Department of History I Faculty of Arts, The University of Melbourne Submitted in total fulfilment of the requirements of the degr'ee of Masters of Arts (by Thesis only) JulV 2005 ABSTRACT Andrew Fisher was prime minister of Australia three times. During his second ministry (1910-1913) he headed a government that was, until the 1940s, Australia's most reformist government. Fisher's second government controlled both Houses; it was the first effective Labor administration in the history of the Commonwealth. In the three years, 113 Acts were placed on the statute books changing the future pattern of the Commonwealth. Despite the volume of legislation and changes in the political life of Australia during his ministry, there is no definitive full-scale biographical published work on Andrew Fisher. There are only limited articles upon his federal political career. Until the 1960s most historians considered Fisher a bit-player, a second ranker whose main quality was his moderating influence upon the Caucus and Labor ministry. Few historians have discussed Fisher's role in the Dreadnought scare of 1909, nor the background to his attempts to change the Constitution in order to correct the considered deficiencies in the original drafting. This thesis will attempt to redress these omissions from historical scholarship Firstly, it investigates Fisher's reaction to the Dreadnought scare in 1909 and the reasons for his refusal to agree to the financing of the Australian navy by overseas borrowing.
    [Show full text]
  • Papers on Parliament No. 14
    PAPERS ON PARLIAMENT Number 14 February 1992 Parliamentary Perspectives 1991 Published and Printed by the Department of the Senate Parliament House, Canberra ISSN 1031-976X The Department of the Senate acknowledges the assistance of the Department of the Parliamentary Reporting Staff. Cover design: Conroy + Donovan, Canberra NOTE This issue of Papers on Parliament includes lectures given in the Senate Department's Occasional Lecture series during the second half of 1991, together with a paper given by the Clerk of the Senate, Harry Evans, to a seminar organised by the Queensland Electoral and Administrative Review Commission in Brisbane on 26 July 1991. It concludes with a digest of procedurally significant events in the Senate during 1991 which we hope to include as a regular feature of Papers on Parliament. CONTENTS Page Chapter 1 - John Black, Michael Macklin and Chris Puplick 1 How Parliament Works in Practice Chpater 2 - John Button 20 The Role of the Leader of the Government in the Senate Chpater 3 - Hugh Collins 31 Political Literacy: Educating for Democracy Chapter 4 - Harry Evans 47 Parliamentary Reform: New Directions and Possibilities for Reform of Parliamentary Processes Chapter 5 - Senate Department 61 Senate Procedural Digest 1991 Parliamentary Reform: New Directions and Possibilities for Reform of Parliamentary Processes Harry Evans Clerk of the Senate Parliament and the Problem of Government In considering the reform of parliament we are examining the alteration of the basic institutions of government, and it is therefore wise to refer to first principles, and to ponder how the task relates to the elementary problem of government. The great difficulty of government is the creation of authorities with sufficient power to achieve the desired aims of government, peace and order, while preventing the unintended misuse of that power.
    [Show full text]
  • Optional Preferential Voting for the Australian Senate
    ELECTORAL REGULATION RESEARCH NETWORK/DEMOCRATIC AUDIT OF AUSTRALIA JOINT WORKING PAPER SERIES OPTIONAL PREFERENTIAL VOTING FOR THE AUSTRALIAN SENATE Michael Maley (Associate, Centre For Democratic Institutions, Australian National University) WORKING PAPER NO. 16 (NOVEMBER 2013) 1 Introduction This paper explores the possible use of optional preferential voting (OPV) as a way of dealing with concerns which have been crystallised at the 2013 Australian federal election about the operation of some aspects of the Senate electoral system. Its main emphasis is on the extent to which full preferential voting no longer enables voters to express their preferences truthfully, and the role which OPV could play in correcting this.1 In a number of respects, the election was remarkable. • The 40 vacancies were contested by a record number of candidates, 529. • The percentage of votes polled by parties already represented in the Parliament dropped significantly from 2010. • In five out of the six States, a candidate was elected from a party which had never previously been represented in the federal Parliament. • For the first time ever, the seats in one State, South Australia, were divided between five different parties. • In Victoria, a minor party candidate was elected after having polled only 0.5% of the first preference votes cast in the State. • In Western Australia, a partial recount of ballot papers was ordered, and in the aftermath of its conduct it was revealed by the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) that some 1,375 ballot papers “all of which had been verified during the initial WA Senate count … could not be located, rechecked or verified in the recount process”.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit 5 Constitutional Development – a Historical Perspective
    UNIT 5 CONSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT – A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE Structure 5.1 Introduction 5.2 Objectives 5.3 Making of the Constitution and Constitutional Principles 5.3.1 Responsible Government 5.3.2 Federalism 5.4 The Constitutional Structure 5.4.1 The Senate and the Constitution 5.4.2 Constitutional Crisis of 1975 5.5 Australian Parliament and the Constitution 5.5.1 Declining Role of the Parliament 5.6 'Revival' of the Senate 5.6.1 Reforming the Senate 5.7 Referendum and the Debate for a Republic 5.7.1 The Referendum of 1999 5.7.2 Failure of the Referendum 5.8 Summary 5.9 Exercises Suggested Readings 5.1 INTRODUCTION The Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia (referred to as the Constitution hereafter) came into effect on 1 January 1901. For students of political science, it is not enough to know simply the provisions of a country's constitution. For, it is only a formal document that establishes institutions and rules of governance. Equally important, they must know many of the unwritten conventions, rules, understandings and practices within which a country's Constitution operates. In other words, you should have a clear idea of the broader 'constitutional framework'. It is the 'constitutional framework', which expresses many things. For instance, the meaning of Australia as a nation, the inter-play between various institutions and levels of government (some of which are mentioned while others are not in the Australian Constitution) and the relationship between the government and the citizens; and, of course, the way political parties shape the functioning of Australian Constitution and many of its institutions-all these can be comprehended only by studying the constitutional framework of Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Young People and Democracy: a Review
    YOUNG PEOPLE AND DEMOCRACY: A REVIEW A Whitlam Institute ‘Future of Australian Democracy – Young People and Democracy’ Research Project Associate Professor Philippa Collin and Jane McCormack Young and Resilient Research Centre | Institute for Culture and Society | Western Sydney University August 2020 About the Whitlam Institute The Whitlam Institute is building a nationally significant institution delivering distinctive, bold and inspiring policy research and programs that promote common ground, inclusive national identity and civic engagement for all Australians. We seek to be recognised across the political spectrum as delivering a nation-building agenda. “...help the great and continuing work of building a more equal, open, tolerant and independent Australia.” Gough Whitlam 2010 For more information about the Whitlam Institute, please visit our website whitlam.org About the Authors Associate Professor Philippa Collin Jane McCormack Principal Research Fellow, Institute for Culture Research Associate and Society, Western Sydney University Jane has conducted research in academic, advisory, Philippa Collin co-directs the WSU Young and Resilient commercial and non-government organisation contexts Research Centre and the Intergener8 Living Lab and is a across a range of topics, including social media and co-Stream Leader for the Wellbeing, Health and Youth the wellbeing of children and young people, and NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence (2017 – 2022). young people’s participation in democracy. A social scientist, Philippa studies new forms of political participation, identity and governance as they relate to the dynamics of elitism and exclusion – particularly for young people. She also studies the role of the digital in the social, cultural and political lives of young people, with a focus on the implications for health and wellbeing.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Britannia
    Mary Murnane A New Britannia ONE OF THE ASSUMPTIONS pervading the study of Australian history is that the working class and their political correlate the Labor Party were the bearers of what is distinctively Australian. It is perhaps for this reason the history of the Labor Movement is a favorite field of study for Australian historians. A New Britannia is essentially a history of the Labor Movement — but with a difference. It is not Humphrey McQueen’s primary intention to argue the significance of the strikes of the 1890’s; to date with accuracy Labor’s intention to enter politics; or to dissect the more notorious strikes of the twentieth century. McQueen refers to these other peaks in the history of the Labor Movement and sometimes records a deviant interpretation. But the central impulse of the book is to locate the Labor Movement in the materialistic, acquisitive perspectives of Australian society as a whole. McQueen accords more importance to racism as a component of Australian nationalism than any historian heretofore. It is, he says, “the most important single component of Australian nat­ ionalism”. Racism had an economic origin — the fear that the labor markets wouldl be flooded with cheap colored labor. McQueen sees racism as more than the fear of the Australian worker that he would lose his bargaining power vis a vis his employer — scarcity of labor. He refers to a notion of “pure racism” which was born on the goldfields of the 1850’s. Diggers blamed bad luck on the Chinese, anti-Chinese riots occurred, the most well known being at Lambing Flat in 1861.
    [Show full text]
  • THE POLITICAL SCENE Whenmr
    CHAPTER I1 THE POLITICAL SCENE WHENMr. Cook forced the double dissolution he calculated that the Liberal party would be returned at the genexal election with substantial majorities in both Houses of the Federal Parliament. The Labour party, regarded simply as the political instrument of the trades unions, was not strong enough to win the election. Its leaders were well aware that, although the massing of the working-class votes in certain urban constituencies in the capital cities gave them a solid core of support, which would he faithful in all eventualities, victory wculd depend upon the disposition of the thousands of voters who were not pledged to either party, but whose political sympathies were swayed by independent interests, judgment, and feeling. The Liberal party managers reckoned that this “middle” vote would for the most part swing to the support of the Government, in order to put an end to the paralysing Conditions which had prevailed in Parliament during 1913-14. The manipulators of the Labour political machinery were not confident that the estimates of their rivals were misjudged. In public both sides maintained the defiant optiniism which proclaims the inevitableness of triumph ; but in private there was a more pallid hope among the Labour leaders than in the opposite camp. The principal newspapers of the Commonwealth unanimously supported the Govern- ment ; the Labour party commanded extremely meagre press influence. No dispassionate judge of the prospects would have said that the election was a foregone conclusion ; probably most would have considered that the Liberal Government had the better prospects. Between the two party leaders there was not much to choose in respect to character and ability.
    [Show full text]
  • Expect to Find Residuary Power and Some Controlling Power in the Imperial Parliament and the Imperial Government
    THE NEW AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH In any description of the present political condition of Aus- tralia the federal constitution naturally commands the first place. But students of politics have already had sufficient opportunity of becoming acquainted with the history of. the federal movement, and with the structure of the new commonwealth to make it unnec- essary to examine the constitution in any detail.’ To a very large extent the framers of the constitution worked upon existing models; and the principal interest in the new constitution lies in those parts which, departing from those models, express some dis- tinctively Australian characteristic or aspiration, or bear upon the position of Australia in the empire. Moreover, it is above all the economic experiments of Australia-her legislation and admin- istration-which form her principal claim to attention whether of students or of politicians; the- activity rather than the structure of her government. The natural model for the union of a group of British colonies would have been the Dominion of Canada of which the constituent act in its preamble recites the desire of the provinces to be united into one dominion &dquo;with a constitution similar in principle to that of the United Kingdom.&dquo; But the character of the Canadian union was determined by special circumstances both internal and external, very different from any which exist in regard to Aus- tralia. The fundamental character of the dominion-the possession of residuary power by the dominion government and the subordi- nation of the provinces to the dominion government-was the natural outcome of the existing consolidation of the provinces of Upper and Lower Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Hansard 30 Oct 1997
    30 Oct 1997 Vacancy in Senate of Commonwealth of Australia 4051 THURSDAY, 30 OCTOBER 1997 As this Parliament does not have a representative of the Australian Democrats, I move the motion nominating the authorised Australian Democrat nominee and the Leader At 8.45 a.m., of the Opposition seconds the motion. I am very happy to do so, as I am sure my Mr SPEAKER (Hon. N. J. Turner, Nicklin) colleague opposite is happy to second. took the chair. Despite the politics of Cheryl Kernot's precipitate resignation from the Parliament VACANCY IN SENATE OF COMMONWEALTH and the Australian Democrats, it is appropriate OF AUSTRALIA and correct that a spirit of bipartisanship is manifested today in choosing her successor. Nomination of Andrew John Julian Bartlett, vice Cheryl Kernot Today is also an historic occasion because it is the first time to my knowledge Mr SPEAKER: Order! The House has that the Queensland Parliament has fast- resolved to meet at 8.45 a.m. this day for the tracked the selection process by suspending purpose of the election of a senator. There Standing Orders so that the expressed wish of being a quorum present, the meeting is now the Queensland electorate is in no way constituted. Honourable members should note diminished. Honourable members will be that the provisions of Standing Orders and aware that the Government in the House of Rules shall apply to this meeting. I now call for Representatives and the Senate has granted nominations. I point out that every nomination a pair so that, until the Queensland Parliament must be accompanied by a declaration by the fills the vacancy, the relative voting strength of nominee of qualification and consent to be the parties in the Senate is not altered.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Conference of the Samuel Griffith
    Chapter Four Independents and Minor Parties in the Commonwealth Parliament J. B. Paul I accepted Julian Leeser’s invitation to address the Society on this subject without a second thought. Had I thought twice about it I might have queried him on a vexing problem: how to compress this subject into a presentation confined to thirty minutes. It follows that my fully prepared statement will have to be published with the other papers. The first and shorter part of this paper will deal with the House of Representatives; the second and more important part will deal with the Senate. The House of Representatives Two factors have limited the role of Independents and minor parties in the House: it comprises single-member constituencies and two succeeding electoral systems have governed its elections. From 1901 to 1918 the simple majority/plurality system applied. This has been misnamed “first-past-the-post”: a misnomer because there was no fixed post for the winning candidate to get past. Independents found it difficult to top the poll against candidates endorsed by political parties. Independents found their position more favourable under the preferential system introduced in 1918 especially when a seat was being contested by three or more candidates. If the count went to preferences an Independent could move to a winning position from behind with each distribution. Not that this happened often! I would isolate two examples when an Independent has succeeded. In the 1922 election, a prominent leader of the Victorian Bar, J G Latham, KC, contested and won the seat of Kooyong, then held by a grandee of the Nationalist Party, Sir Robert Best.
    [Show full text]