DOCSLIB.ORG

Teng Tianhang 201606 MAS T

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Teng Tianhang 201606 MAS T Representative Post-Stall Modeling of T-tailed Regional Jets and Turboprops for Upset Recovery Training by Tianhang Teng A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Applied Science Graduate Department of Aerospace Science and Engineering University of Toronto c Copyright 2016 by Tianhang Teng Abstract Representative Post-Stall Modeling of T-tailed Regional Jets and Turboprops for Upset Recovery Training Tianhang Teng Master of Applied Science Graduate Department of Aerospace Science and Engineering University of Toronto 2016 Loss-of-control resulting from airplane upset is a leading cause of worldwide commer- cial aircraft accidents. In order to provide pilots with sufficient stall recovery training using ground simulators, flight models will need to be improved. In this thesis, a methodology for generating a generic representative post-stall aircraft model is developed. Current type specific post-stall models are too expensive to generate, and are not practical for routine training. The representative model offers a much cheaper way to train crew for upset conditions, at the same time providing sufficiently realistic cues seen in an upset condition. The methodology provides a foundation for generating full scale representative models using wind tunnel data and physics-based approaches. An example of applying the methodology to predict stall regime aircraft behavior is provided for one aerodynamic coefficient. ii Acknowledgements First, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my thesis supervisor Professor Peter Grant for the continuous support of my MASc study and related research, for his patience, motivation, and immense knowledge. His guidance helped me throughout the entire research and writing portions of this thesis. I could not have imagined having a better advisor and mentor for my MASc study. I would like to thank Stacey Liu for her tremendous support in the lab, for help on technical knowledge, as well as moral support at difficult times. Thanks also go out to the Plane of Sky (POS) group, Tony Zhang, Zane Luo, and Jacek Khan for their feedback on some of the issues related to this study, for the sleepless nights we were working together before deadlines, and for all the fun we have had in the last few years. Finally, I would like to thank my parents and my girlfriend for their constant support during the course of my studies. iii Contents 1 Introduction1 1.1 Background..................................1 1.2 Upset Recovery Training...........................2 1.3 Post Stall Modeling..............................3 1.4 Project Definition...............................4 1.5 Organization.................................5 2 Literature Review6 2.1 Existing Post-Stall Model..........................6 2.2 Semi-Analytical Methods...........................9 2.2.1 Linear Methods............................9 2.2.2 Non-Linear Methods......................... 11 2.3 Stall Aerodynamics.............................. 13 2.3.1 G Break/Pitch Non-Linearity.................... 14 2.3.2 Roll-Off................................ 15 2.3.3 Reduced Lateral/Directional Stability................ 15 2.3.4 Reduced Control Effectiveness.................... 15 2.4 Configuration Effects............................. 16 2.4.1 Tail Effects.............................. 16 2.4.2 Nacelle Effects............................ 19 2.4.3 Wing Effects............................. 19 2.4.4 Fuselage Effects............................ 21 2.4.5 Engine/Power Effects......................... 21 2.5 Published Wind Tunnel Data........................ 22 3 Basic Methodology 26 3.1 Model Structure................................ 26 3.2 Modeling Approach.............................. 28 iv 3.3 Configuration Deltas (∆)........................... 30 4 Generation of Configuration ∆'s 32 4.1 Overview.................................... 32 4.2 Semi-Analytical Approach.......................... 33 4.2.1 Coefficient of Lift CL ......................... 39 4.2.2 Coefficient of Pitching Moment Cm ................. 42 4.2.3 Coefficient of Rolling Moment Cφ due to β ............. 43 4.2.4 Flap Effects.............................. 46 4.2.5 Engine Power Effects CT ....................... 48 4.2.6 Dynamic Effects Clp and Clr ..................... 51 4.3 Empirical Approach.............................. 53 4.3.1 Effects of Nacelle-Tail Interaction on Pitching Moment...... 54 4.3.2 Effects of Wing-Tail Interaction on Pitching Moment....... 58 4.3.3 Effects of Tail Location on Pitching Moment............ 59 4.3.4 Effects of Tail Size and Incidence on Pitching Moment...... 59 4.3.5 Effects of Fuselage on Pitching Moment............... 60 5 Full Scale Example 62 6 Conclusions 67 6.1 Summary of Work.............................. 67 6.2 Future Research Needs............................ 69 References 70 v List of Figures 2.1 Enhanced post stall model developed by NASA LaRC [1].........7 2.2 Blending method used on merging post stall model onto existing pre-stall model [2]....................................8 2.3 Classical vortex-lattice method....................... 11 2.4 Pitching moment for conventional tailed aircraft versus T-tailed aircraft. Reprinted from [3].............................. 14 2.5 Schematic of Tail Effect on Cm for T-Tail (Data adapted from NASA technical report [4]).............................. 17 2.6 Effect of horizontal tail size on Cm. Adapted from Ray [4]........ 18 2.7 Effect of horizontal tail incidence angle on Cm. Adapted from Ray [4].. 18 2.8 Nacelle Location effect on Cm(α), dashed lines are nacelle off condition (Reprinted from Ray [4])........................... 19 2.9 Sweep effect on Cm(α) (Reprinted from NASA technical report [4])... 20 2.10 Effect of fuselage shape and size on Cm. Adapted from Ray [4]...... 21 2.11 Effect of fuselage length on Cm. Adapted from Ray [4].......... 21 2.12 Wind tunnel data of CT effect on a straight wing turboprop aircraft... 22 3.1 Example Pitch Moment Coefficients for Target pre-stall (T P ), Target es- timated pre-stall/stall/post-stall (T E), and Target Stretched/offset pre- stall/stall/post-stall ( T M )......................... 29 3.2 Example Pitch Moment Coefficients for Target pre-stall (T P ), Target Stretched/offset stall (T M ) and Target stall model (T S). Blending occurs between two dashed vertical lines............................. 30 4.1 Spanwise lift distribution for angle of attack ranging from 0◦ to 25◦ at 5◦ interval..................................... 34 4.2 Viscous remapping procedure for a generic swept wing using a generic cambered airfoil................................ 35 4.3 Schematic of the de-α process........................ 37 vi 4.4 Prediction of CL after every iteration of de-α ................ 38 4.5 Comparison between α-correction method and crude direct remap method 38 4.6 3-D effect on the spanwise lift distribution. Reprinted from [5]...... 38 4.7 Example of spanwise lift after correcting for 3-D effect.......... 38 4.8 Comparison of de-α method vs. wind tunnel data using wing modeled from Ostawari [6]............................... 41 4.9 2-D lift curve of NACA 4415 airfoil..................... 41 4.10 Comparison between the potential flow and corrected span-wise lift distri- bution..................................... 41 4.11 2-D lift curve of the artificially generated NACA 0024 airfoil....... 42 4.12 Comparison of wing configuration from Shortal [7] with wind tunnel data 42 4.13 Comparison of wing configuration from Shortal [7] with wind tunnel data 43 4.14 2-D pitching moment curve of the artificially generated NACA 0024 airfoil 43 4.15 Spanwise lift distribution for straight wing at α = 15◦ β = −10◦ ..... 44 4.16 Comparison of the spanwise lift of wings under sideslip for higher α ... 45 4.17 Comparison of Cr vs. β for wing configuration from Ray [8]....... 45 4.18 Comparison of Crβ for wing configuration from Ray [8].......... 45 4.19 Definition of the three parameters. Plot shows two-dimensional trailing- edge flap effects................................ 46 4.20 2-D lift curve of clean airfoil versus predicted flap 35 configuration.... 47 4.21 Comparison of predicted CL and Cm against wind tunnel data for flap 35 48 4.22 Augment spanwise lift distribution to capture accelerated flow...... 49 4.23 Comparing predicted CT effects against wind tunnel data for high and low CT ....................................... 50 4.24 A schematic showing the two side of the wing at non-zero rolling rate.. 51 4.25 Spanwise lift distribution under non-zero p or r .............. 52 4.26 Spanwise lift distribution of an already stalled wing under non-zero p .. 52 4.27 Predicted Clp for a straight wing....................... 52 4.28 Predicted Clr for a straight wing....................... 52 4.29 Isolation of nacelle-tail interaction N ⊗ VH ................ 56 4.30 N ⊗ VH effect for various tail shadow angles................ 56 4.31 Spline points on the interpolation curve................... 56 4.32 Extrapolation of nacelle-tail interaction from tail shadowing angle.... 56 4.33 ∆ term subtracted from the two interoplated curves............ 57 4.34 Comparison of wind tunnel data between target configuration and baseline + ∆...................................... 57 vii 4.35 Isolation of wing-tail interaction W ⊗ VH ................. 58 4.36 W ⊗ VH effect for various tail shadow angles............... 58 4.37 Look-up graph for horizontal tail size.................... 60 4.38 Look-up graph for horizontal tail incidence angle.............. 60 4.39 Look-up graph for fuselage cross-section size................ 60 4.40 Look-up
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CANARD.WING LIFT INTERFERENCE RELATED to MANEUVERING AIRCRAFT at SUBSONIC SPEEDS by Blair B
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19740003706 2020-03-23T12:22:11+00:00Z NASA TECHNICAL NASA TM X-2897 MEMORANDUM CO CN| I X CANARD.WING LIFT INTERFERENCE RELATED TO MANEUVERING AIRCRAFT AT SUBSONIC SPEEDS by Blair B. Gloss and Linwood W. McKmney Langley Research Center Hampton, Va. 23665 NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION • WASHINGTON, D. C. • DECEMBER 1973 1.. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. NASA TM X-2897 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date CANARD-WING LIFT INTERFERENCE RELATED TO December 1973 MANEUVERING AIRCRAFT AT SUBSONIC SPEEDS 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. L-9096 Blair B. Gloss and Linwood W. McKinney 10. Work Unit No. 9. Performing Organization Name and Address • 760-67-01-01 NASA Langley Research Center 11. Contract or Grant No. Hampton, Va. 23665 13. Type of Report and Period Covered 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Technical Memorandum National Aeronautics and Space Administration 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Washington , D . C . 20546 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract An investigation was conducted at Mach numbers of 0.7 and 0.9 to determine the lift interference effect of canard location on wing planforms typical of maneuvering fighter con- figurations. The canard had an exposed area of 16.0 percent of the wing reference area and was located in the plane of the wing or in a position 18.5 percent of the wing mean geometric chord above the wing plane. In addition, the canard could be located at two longitudinal stations.
    [Show full text]
  • Vertical Motion Simulator Experiment on Stall Recovery Guidance
    NASA/TP{2017{219733 Vertical Motion Simulator Experiment on Stall Recovery Guidance Stefan Schuet National Aeronautics and Space Administration Thomas Lombaerts Stinger Ghaffarian Technologies, Inc. Vahram Stepanyan Universities Space Research Association John Kaneshige, Kimberlee Shish, Peter Robinson National Aeronautics and Space Administration Gordon Hardy Retired Research Test Pilot Science Applications International Corporation October 2017 NASA STI Program. in Profile Since its founding, NASA has been dedicated • CONFERENCE PUBLICATION. to the advancement of aeronautics and space Collected papers from scientific and science. The NASA scientific and technical technical conferences, symposia, seminars, information (STI) program plays a key part or other meetings sponsored or in helping NASA maintain this important co-sponsored by NASA. role. • SPECIAL PUBLICATION. Scientific, The NASA STI Program operates under the technical, or historical information from auspices of the Agency Chief Information NASA programs, projects, and missions, Officer. It collects, organizes, provides for often concerned with subjects having archiving, and disseminates NASA's STI. substantial public interest. The NASA STI Program provides access to the NASA Aeronautics and Space Database • TECHNICAL TRANSLATION. English- and its public interface, the NASA Technical language translations of foreign scientific Report Server, thus providing one of the and technical material pertinent to largest collection of aeronautical and space NASA's mission. science STI in the world. Results are Specialized services also include organizing published in both non-NASA channels and and publishing research results, distributing by NASA in the NASA STI Report Series, specialized research announcements and which includes the following report types: feeds, providing information desk and • TECHNICAL PUBLICATION. Reports of personal search support, and enabling data completed research or a major significant exchange services.
    [Show full text]
  • Airplane Icing
    Federal Aviation Administration Airplane Icing Accidents That Shaped Our Safety Regulations Presented to: AE598 UW Aerospace Engineering Colloquium By: Don Stimson, Federal Aviation Administration Topics Icing Basics Certification Requirements Ice Protection Systems Some Icing Generalizations Notable Accidents/Resulting Safety Actions Readings – For More Information AE598 UW Aerospace Engineering Colloquium Federal Aviation 2 March 10, 2014 Administration Icing Basics How does icing occur? Cold object (airplane surface) Supercooled water drops Water drops in a liquid state below the freezing point Most often in stratiform and cumuliform clouds The airplane surface provides a place for the supercooled water drops to crystalize and form ice AE598 UW Aerospace Engineering Colloquium Federal Aviation 3 March 10, 2014 Administration Icing Basics Important Parameters Atmosphere Liquid Water Content and Size of Cloud Drop Size and Distribution Temperature Airplane Collection Efficiency Speed/Configuration/Temperature AE598 UW Aerospace Engineering Colloquium Federal Aviation 4 March 10, 2014 Administration Icing Basics Cloud Characteristics Liquid water content is generally a function of temperature and drop size The colder the cloud, the more ice crystals predominate rather than supercooled water Highest water content near 0º C; below -40º C there is negligible water content Larger drops tend to precipitate out, so liquid water content tends to be greater at smaller drop sizes The average liquid water content decreases with horizontal
    [Show full text]
  • CAP High Ground 18.03
    The High Ground A Newsletter From Wyoming Wing Standards/Evaluation 15 March, 2018 Hot Topics Pilot Proficiency Profiles… The New Reality! With the implementation of CAPR 70-1 Flight Management, the Air Force came out with new requirements for documentation of training sorties. The AF now requires us to document what is planned, and what we actually accomplished during that sortie, per the Pilot Prof iciency Profile. We are required to accomplish all of the REQUIRED items listed in the PPP Checklist. We have to document each item and upload/note supporting documentation, or document why we did not accomplish the required item. Please review the preamble of the Pilot Proficiency Profiles (first page) and the specific Profile which you are planning on flying. Unfortunately, we can’t “just wing it” anymore. (Sigh) This ain’t my idea, this is from “On High”. Pilot Proficiency Profiles To review, the Pilot Proficiency Profiles, dated 01 January 2018, have changes. Best to print out a copy and keep it handy while operating under any one of these Profiles. And the Profiles are now to be documented in the “Profile Used” in WMIRS as P#, i.e. Profile number 1 would be entered as “P1”. Note that each Profile has a header which dictates the PIC qualifications to operate under that Profile. Read these before you attempt to fly the Profile. Now the BIG CHANGE is in the details of each Profile, what we are expected to do, and what we have to document for each Pilot Proficiency Profile sortie. Each PPP has in its description “Routine” and “Required” Items.
    [Show full text]
  • Stall Warnings in High Capacity Aircraft: the Australian Context 2008 to 2012
    Stall warnings in high capacityInsert document aircraft: title The Australian context Location2008 to 2012 | Date ATSB Transport Safety Report InvestigationResearch [InsertAviation Mode] Research Occurrence Report Investigation XX-YYYY-####AR-2012-172 Final – 1 November 2013 Publishing information Published by: Australian Transport Safety Bureau Postal address: PO Box 967, Civic Square ACT 2608 Office: 62 Northbourne Avenue Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601 Telephone: 1800 020 616, from overseas +61 2 6257 4150 (24 hours) Accident and incident notification: 1800 011 034 (24 hours) Facsimile: 02 6247 3117, from overseas +61 2 6247 3117 Email: [email protected] Internet: www.atsb.gov.au © Commonwealth of Australia 2013 Ownership of intellectual property rights in this publication Unless otherwise noted, copyright (and any other intellectual property rights, if any) in this publication is owned by the Commonwealth of Australia. Creative Commons licence With the exception of the Coat of Arms, ATSB logo, and photos and graphics in which a third party holds copyright, this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence is a standard form license agreement that allows you to copy, distribute, transmit and adapt this publication provided that you attribute the work. The ATSB’s preference is that you attribute this publication (and any material sourced from it) using the following wording: Source: Australian Transport Safety Bureau Copyright in material obtained from other agencies, private individuals or organisations, belongs to those agencies, individuals or organisations. Where you want to use their material you will need to contact them directly.
    [Show full text]
  • SM11188 Standard Modification Page : 1 of 6 Issue 1 Compiled : S Brown Approved : F Donaldson
    Mod No. SM11188 Standard Modification Page : 1 of 6 Issue 1 Compiled : S Brown Approved : F Donaldson TITLE : Main Wing Trailing Edge Flow Straighteners AIRCRAFT TYPE : Vari-Eze Mod Type: Retro-fit 1. Introduction The Rutan Aircraft Factory approved the (later to be mandatory) installation of leading edge vortilons on all Vari-Ezes in the October 1984 edition of the Canard Pusher ( CP 42 pages 5/6) to improve the swept main wing stall margins, increase visibility over the nose on final approach and enable reduced approach speeds without the risk of low speed wing rock or deep stall. The vortilons generate vortices over the main wing at high angles of attack that reduce lift-losing span-wise flow. There is negligible speed or drag penalty Flow straighteners positioned on the trailing edge of the swept main wing further reduce span wise flow at high angles of attack. It has been demonstrated that the addition of trailing edge flow straighteners enable the wing to produce more lift at a given angle of attack enabling lower approach speeds with no loss of view over the nose. The result is a reduced sink rate for a given airspeed and an increased margin between main wing and canard stall speeds. 2. Parts List Qty Part No. Description Source 2 SM11188-1 Outboard Fence Manufacture 2 SM11188-2 Middle Fence Manufacture 2 SM11188-3 Inboard Fence Manufacture White RTV Silicone Hardware store Flocked Cotton / BID / Aircraft Spruce Epoxy Resin List of related drawings / photos Drawing No. Title / Description Issue SM11188-D1 Drawing of Flow Straighteners dimensions SM11188-D2 Drawing of installation on main wing and fitting detail SM11188-D3 Photograph of Gary Hertzler’s fences installation on N99VE 3.
    [Show full text]
  • FAA-H-8083-3A, Airplane Flying Handbook -- 3 of 7 Files
    Ch 04.qxd 5/7/04 6:46 AM Page 4-1 NTRODUCTION Maneuvering during slow flight should be performed I using both instrument indications and outside visual The maintenance of lift and control of an airplane in reference. Slow flight should be practiced from straight flight requires a certain minimum airspeed. This glides, straight-and-level flight, and from medium critical airspeed depends on certain factors, such as banked gliding and level flight turns. Slow flight at gross weight, load factors, and existing density altitude. approach speeds should include slowing the airplane The minimum speed below which further controlled smoothly and promptly from cruising to approach flight is impossible is called the stalling speed. An speeds without changes in altitude or heading, and important feature of pilot training is the development determining and using appropriate power and trim of the ability to estimate the margin of safety above the settings. Slow flight at approach speed should also stalling speed. Also, the ability to determine the include configuration changes, such as landing gear characteristic responses of any airplane at different and flaps, while maintaining heading and altitude. airspeeds is of great importance to the pilot. The student pilot, therefore, must develop this awareness in FLIGHT AT MINIMUM CONTROLLABLE order to safely avoid stalls and to operate an airplane AIRSPEED This maneuver demonstrates the flight characteristics correctly and safely at slow airspeeds. and degree of controllability of the airplane at its minimum flying speed. By definition, the term “flight SLOW FLIGHT at minimum controllable airspeed” means a speed at Slow flight could be thought of, by some, as a speed which any further increase in angle of attack or load that is less than cruise.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 12 Design of Control Surfaces
    Aileron Design Chapter 12 Design of Control Surfaces From: Aircraft Design: A Systems Engineering Approach Mohammad Sadraey 792 pages September 2012, Hardcover Wiley Publications 12.4.1. Introduction The primary function of an aileron is the lateral (i.e. roll) control of an aircraft; however, it also affects the directional control. Due to this reason, the aileron and the rudder are usually designed concurrently. Lateral control is governed primarily through a roll rate (P). Aileron is structurally part of the wing, and has two pieces; each located on the trailing edge of the outer portion of the wing left and right sections. Both ailerons are often used symmetrically, hence their geometries are identical. Aileron effectiveness is a measure of how good the deflected aileron is producing the desired rolling moment. The generated rolling moment is a function of aileron size, aileron deflection, and its distance from the aircraft fuselage centerline. Unlike rudder and elevator which are displacement control, the aileron is a rate control. Any change in the aileron geometry or deflection will change the roll rate; which subsequently varies constantly the roll angle. The deflection of any control surface including the aileron involves a hinge moment. The hinge moments are the aerodynamic moments that must be overcome to deflect the control surfaces. The hinge moment governs the magnitude of augmented pilot force required to move the corresponding actuator to deflect the control surface. To minimize the size and thus the cost of the actuation system, the ailerons should be designed so that the control forces are as low as possible.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dynamics of Static Stall
    16th Int Symp on Applications of Laser Techniques to Fluid Mechanics Lisbon, Portugal, 09-12 July, 2012 The Dynamics of Static Stall Karen Mulleners1∗, Arnaud Le Pape2, Benjamin Heine1, Markus Raffel1 1: Helicopter Department, German Aerospace Centre (DLR), Göttingen, Germany 2: Applied Aerodynamics Department, ONERA, The French Aerospace Lab, Meudon, France * Current address: Institute of Turbomachinery and Fluid Dynamics, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Germany, [email protected] Abstract The dynamic process of flow separation on a stationary airfoil in a uniform flow was investigated experimentally by means of time-resolved measurements of the velocity field and the airfoil’s surface pressure distribution. The unsteady movement of the separation point, the growth of the separated region, and surface pressure fluctuations were examined in order to obtain information about the chronology of stall development. The early inception of stall is characterised with the abrupt upstream motion of the separation point. During subsequent stall development, large scale shear layer structures are formed and grow while travelling down- stream. This leads to a gradual increase of the separated flow region reaching his maximum size at the end of stall development which is marked by a significant lift drop. 1 Introduction Stall on lifting surfaces is a commonly encountered, mostly undesired, condition in aviation that occurs when a critical angle of attack is exceeded. At low angles of attack a, lift increases linearly with a. At higher angles of attack an adverse pressure gradient builds up on the airfoil’s suction side which eventually forces the flow to separate and the lift to drop.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Low-Speed Stall Aerodynamics of a Swept Wing with Laminar-Flow Glove
    NASA/TM—2014–216641 Analysis of Low-Speed Stall Aerodynamics of a Swept Wing with Laminar-Flow Glove Trong T. Bui Dryden Flight Research Center, Edwards, California Click here: Press F1 key (Windows) or Help key (Mac) for help January 2014 This page is required and contains approved text that cannot be changed. NASA STI Program ... in Profile Since its founding, NASA has been dedicated • CONFERENCE PUBLICATION. to the advancement of aeronautics and space Collected papers from scientific and science. The NASA scientific and technical technical conferences, symposia, seminars, information (STI) program plays a key part in or other meetings sponsored or helping NASA maintain this important role. co-sponsored by NASA. The NASA STI program operates under the • SPECIAL PUBLICATION. Scientific, auspices of the Agency Chief Information Officer. technical, or historical information from It collects, organizes, provides for archiving, and NASA programs, projects, and missions, disseminates NASA’s STI. The NASA STI often concerned with subjects having program provides access to the NASA substantial public interest. Aeronautics and Space Database and its public interface, the NASA Technical Reports Server, • TECHNICAL TRANSLATION. thus providing one of the largest collections of English-language translations of foreign aeronautical and space science STI in the world. scientific and technical material pertinent to Results are published in both non-NASA channels NASA’s mission. and by NASA in the NASA STI Report Series, which includes the following report types: Specialized services also include organizing and publishing research results, distributing • TECHNICAL PUBLICATION. Reports of specialized research announcements and completed research or a major significant feeds, providing information desk and personal phase of research that present the results of search support, and enabling data exchange NASA Programs and include extensive data services.
    [Show full text]
  • Spin-Resistant Airframe (SRA)
    Spin-Resistant Airframe (SRA) Spin-Resistant Airframe (SRA) ICON Aircraft What is a Spin? A spin is a dangerous combination of a stall and harrowing. During a spin, the aircraft experi- yaw. Spins occur when a stalled aircraft expe- ences low airspeed and a high angle of attack. riences too great a yaw rate, which can be the It is worth noting that this is different from a result of an incorrect rudder input or a pre-exist- spiral dive in which an aircraft experiences high ing yawing moment as would occur if an airplane airspeed and a low angle of attack, and during is stalled while performing an uncoordinated turn. which more control authority is preserved. Some During the ensuing spin, an aircraft rapidly loses spins are recoverable by experienced pilots, but altitude as it rotates about its spin axis, driven by this requires high situational awareness, proper an asymmetric stall condition between the two training, and often more than 1,000 feet of alti- wings. The pilot often loses the ability to control tude. Other spins are unrecoverable, even by the the aircraft because of disorientation or loss of most experienced pilot. control authority, making spins dangerous and iconaircraft.com Spin-Resistant Airframe (SRA) 02 Stalls/spins are a significant mechanical, unknown, or undeter- (above ground level) or below. source of serious accidents in mined in cause. Stall/spin acci- Surprisingly, the highest portion of General Aviation accounting for dents are particularly dangerous stall/spin accidents happened to 41% of fatal accidents that oc- because they usually occur at low private and commercial pilots and curred because of “pilot-related altitude and low airspeeds, such not to students, likely because of factors,” according to the Aircraft as in the traffic pattern during students’ close supervision and Owners and Pilots Association maneuvering when the pilot’s at- the fact that more experienced pi- (AOPA) Air Safety Institute’s 2010 tention is diverted from maintain- lots may have grown complacent Nall Report.
    [Show full text]
  • Design of Canard Aircraft
    APPENDIX C2: Design of Canard Aircraft This appendix is a part of the book General Aviation Aircraft Design: Applied Methods and Procedures by Snorri Gudmundsson, published by Elsevier, Inc. The book is available through various bookstores and online retailers, such as www.elsevier.com, www.amazon.com, and many others. The purpose of the appendices denoted by C1 through C5 is to provide additional information on the design of selected aircraft configurations, beyond what is possible in the main part of Chapter 4, Aircraft Conceptual Layout. Some of the information is intended for the novice engineer, but other is advanced and well beyond what is possible to present in undergraduate design classes. This way, the appendices can serve as a refresher material for the experienced aircraft designer, while introducing new material to the student. Additionally, many helpful design philosophies are presented in the text. Since this appendix is offered online rather than in the actual book, it is possible to revise it regularly and both add to the information and new types of aircraft. The following appendices are offered: C1 – Design of Conventional Aircraft C2 – Design of Canard Aircraft (this appendix) C3 – Design of Seaplanes C4 – Design of Sailplanes C5 – Design of Unusual Configurations Figure C2-1: A single engine, four-seat Velocity 173 SE just before touch-down. (Photo by Phil Rademacher) GUDMUNDSSON – GENERAL AVIATION AIRCRAFT DESIGN APPENDIX C2 – DESIGN OF CANARD AIRCRAFT 1 ©2013 Elsevier, Inc. This material may not be copied or distributed without permission from the Publisher. C2.1 Design of Canard Configurations It has already been stated that preference explains why some aircraft designers (and manufacturers) choose to develop a particular configuration.
    [Show full text]