Perry NETL Poster

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Perry NETL Poster MRCSP Regional Geologic Cross Section and Correlation Chart Steven Greb1, Tomas Sparks1, Dave Barnes2, William Harrison III2, Cristian Medina3, John Rupp3, Mark Baranoski4, Ronald Riley4, Michael Solis4, Chris Perry4, Eric Lewis5, Kristen Carter6, and John Harper6 1Kentucky Geological Survey, 2Western Michigan University, 3Indiana Geological Survey, 4Ohio Geological Survey, 5West Virginia Geological Survey, 6Pennsylvania Geological Survey The Midwest Regional Carbon Sequestration W.V. Michigan Indiana Indiana Kentucky Ohio Kentucky Ohio Kentucky West Virginia Ohio Ohio W.V. Pennsylvania Ohio Partnership (MRCSP) Upper Kentucky Penninsula covers nine-states Michigan Basin Kankakee Arch CincinnaƟ Arch Cambridge Arch Appalachian Basin containing varying RelaƟve posiƟon of HunƟngton, W.V. MarieƩa, Oh. geology and stratigraphic CincinnaƟ͕ Oh. Maysville, Ky. Portsmouth, Oh. Ashland, Ky. Parkersburg, W.V. Wheeling, W.V. PiƩsburgh, Pa. nomenclature. To ensure 3 9 11 18 25 ůevaƟŽŶ (feet) stratigraphic consistency Lake 2 North Indiana Public Central Indiana Common- 19 28 30 Huron Service Co. 12 wealth Gas 29 ŶĞƌgy AcquisiƟon Gas Co. Great Dominion +2,000 No. 1 Corp. No. 1 23 24 Corp. & Weitzman Core Energy No. 16T52 15 26 NĂƟonal ƌnest džƉůor. & Prod. for correlations/ LLC 8 Leuenberger, BeƩy ĚǁĂƌds, ͘͘ Newell Amoco 27 No. 4873 1 No. 1-27 5 7 10 16 Hill No. 1 Corp. No. 1 MĂƌƟŶ No. 4-30 4 6 13 14 Spencer (B&N Coal) Humble Rice Rose ŶĞƌgy North Michigan Land North Indiana Public 21 22 First Energy Georgetown No. 1 ůevaƟŽŶ State Charlton Hunt ŶĞƌgy McClure Oil Co. džxon-Mobile Oil AtlanƟĐ-RitchĮĞůĚ Co. ConƟnental Oil Co. Ford Ashland Oil Petroleum United Fuel 17 Aristech 20 No. 1 No. 1 Pennsylvanian units Inc. No. 1-32 and Oil Corp. Service Co. No. 1 Cyclops GeneraƟon Marine AshcroŌ regional mapping, a (feet) Corp. No. 1-8 No. 1 No. 1-13 Wabash FormaƟon No. 1 No. 1 & ZĞĮning Gas No. 1 (USS United Ullman Minesinger undivided No. 1 BaƩelle Cabot Corp. Inland Gas Corp. No. 1, MRCSP Reno No. 1-15 Sparks, R.J., and Arco & Gaglio Branch Louisville Limestone Resur, R.D. Connery No. 1 Griĸth No. 9061T Chemical/ Fuel Gas Kelly, Gladys Unit Wakeland, L.M. No. 1 No. 1-A No. 537 FEGENCO +1,000 others Waldron Shale Rawlings US Steel) No. 1 No. 1 Mississippian units +1,000 MĂƌƟn Gladwin Duke Wilson Bailey Fannin AEP No. 1 correlation chart of all Kingery undivided Glacial sediments Energy Arrington Mountaineer Undivided Upper Unconsolidated Ordovician units Bedrock Berea FormaƟon formations from surface “Red beds” (CincinnaƟan Series) “CincinnaƟan” Undivided (Big Hill and Stonington FormaƟons) Saginaw FormaƟon Pennsylvanian UƟca FormaƟon units (some Venango Group to the Precambrian in (Bill’s Creek Shale) 0 coal-bearing) 0 Colllingwood Shale Michigan FormaƟon Berea Trenton FormaƟon FormaƟon Black River FormaƟon all nine states has been Sunbury Shale Marshall FormaƟon Glenwood FormaƟon Chadakoin FormĂƟon Saint Peter Sandstone Bedford and Berea Oneota Dolomite Undivided Prairie du Chien Group FormaƟons constructed. The chart Shakopee Mississippian units Trempealeau FormaƟon Coldwater Dolomite -1,000 Munising Group FormaƟon -1,000 Shale Chadakoin Mount Simon Sandstone Bedford and Berea is color coded based on Davis Ohio Limestone FormaƟons and Brallier Bradford Group Shale FormĂƟons Knox Group Chagrin a unit’s potential as: 1) Chagrin Member ? storage interval (regional -2,000 Ohio -2,000 Shale saline reservoir), 2) ? Java FoƌŵĂƟon confi ning interval with thin Basal sandstone Brallier FormaƟon -3,000 Precambrian or Mount Simon -3,000 unconformity Angola local potential reservoirs, Sandstone FoƌŵĂƟon West Falls West Falls Group Maryville Limestone 3) confi ning zone, or 4) Precambrian unconformity organic-rich shale. -4,000 Rhinestreet Shale -4,000 Sonyea FormaƟon Munising Middle Run Genesee FormaƟon To gain a perspective Group Tully Limestone FormaƟŽŶ Hamilton Group of lateral stratigraphic (Precambrian) Marcellus Shale -5,000 Onondaga FormaƟon -5,000 Mount Simon Sandstone Helderberg Group changes across the Keyser FormaƟon Conasauga Maynardsville Limestone Nolichucky Shale Bass Islands Dolomite Group Maryville Limestone region spanning from the St. Peter Ss. Basal sandstone -6,000 -6,000 Michigan Basin, across Precambrian unconformity ? Salina Group Middle Run Grenville ? FormaƟon Province the Arches Province to (Proterozoic) (Proterozoic) ? the Northern Appalachian -7,000 -7,000 Grenville Queenston Precambrian Front FormĂƟon and Lockport Dolomite ? Basin, a detailed cross unconformity Reedsville Shale Rochester Shale ? ? (MĂƌƟnsburg Irondequoit Dolomite Correlation Chart Copper Ridge “B zone” “Clinton” Group) Dayton Dolomite section was constructed. Reynales Dolomite NORTHERN Tuscarora Sandstone -8,000 SOUTHERN AND EASTERN EASTERN -8,000 ? MICHIGAN OHIO KENTUCKY WEST VIRGINIA PENNSYLVANIA MARYLAND NEW YORK NEW JERSEY (Medina Group) ERA INDIANA The section uses 30 (SUB- ? SERIES Basal sandstone SYSTEM SYSTEM) Queenston Shale Monongahela Gp Monongahela Gp Monongahela Gp Monongahela Gp ? deep wells, including Monongahela and ? ? (Juniata FormaƟon) Conemaugh Fms ? undivided ? UPPER Grand River Fm Conemaugh Gp Conemaugh Gp Conemaugh Gp Conemaugh Gp all four wells drilled -9,000 -9,000 ? Bald agle FormaƟon Allegheny Gp Allegheny Fm Allegheny Gp Allegheny Gp ? ? by U.S. Department of ? Pottsville Gp Breathitt Gp Kanawha ? ? MIDDLE Pottsville Fm Pottsville Gp Pottsville Gp Gp ? Reedsville FormaƟon Energy-funded projects ? Saginaw Fm New Olean Cong ? -10,000 ? (PENNSYLVANIAN) River Precambrian ? -10,000 ??? Fm unconformity for testing CO2 storage Poca- LOWER Parma Ss hontas Fm hƟca Shale Mid-conƟnent ? ? ??? Point Pleasant FormaƟon technology in the region. RiŌ Penning- Mauch Bluefield Paragon Chunk Buffalo Wallow Gp Fm ton Fm Fm Trenton Limestone (may include Fm Mauch Chunk Fm ? CARBONIFEROUS Stephensport Gp UPPER ? ? -11,000 Maxville -11,000 Twelve wells were chosen basalts) West Baden Gp Ls Mauch Chunk Black River Limestone Slade Newman Fm Fm Ls Greenbrier Ls Green- ? brier Loysburg FormaƟon Blue River Gp Ls Loyalhanna Ls Greenbrier Fm ? ? along a north-south line ??? Wells Creek FormaƟon Bayport Ls ? ? ? MIDDLE Michigan Fm Sanders Gp Larke from the Core Energy site (Beekmantown) (MISSISSIPPIAN) Borden Grainger Maccrady -12,000 Logan Purslane Ss FormaƟon -12,000 Borden Gp Fm Fm Fm Fm Burgoon Fm ? Marshall Ss Cuyahoga Shenango in the Michigan Basin Coldwater Sh Rockford Ls Price Fm Rockwell Knopp Ss Coldwater Sh Fm Fm LOWER Coldwater Sh Fm Sunbury Sunbury Cuyahoga Rockwell Fm Sunbury Sh Sunbury Sh Pocono Fm Mid-conƟnent Sh Sh Sunbury Sh Sunbury Sh Gp Riddlesburg Berea Ss Mbr Forma Ells- Berea Ss Ellsworth Bedford Berea Ss Berea Ss Berea Ss ? ? Mines Member Gatesburg to the Battelle-Duke RiŌ (including Sh Sh Hampshire Bedford Sh Murryville ? worth Bedford Sh Bedford Sh Bedford Sh Bedford Sh Ss Conewango Local Gp Cussewago Fm Gp Sh New Riceville Fm Oswayo Fm Upper Sandy Member some basalts) sequestration Albany Catskill Chagrin Venang Hampshire Fm Ohio o Gp Fm Conneaut Gp Ɵ -13,000 target Sh Ohio Sh Fm Chadakoin -13,000 Antrim Ohio Sh Sh Greenland Gap on Energy site in Kentucky Gp Fm Bradford Gp Canadway Gp Sh Huron Ore Hill Member Sh Foreknobs Fm UPPER Java Elk Antrim Sh Chattanooga Sh Java Fm Green- Java Fm Upper Java Fm Olentangy Sh Fm Gp Scherr Fm Lower Sandy Member Antrim Sh Olentangy Sh land Gap West Falls Fm Brallier West Falls Fm Gp West Falls Gp West Rhinestreet Sh Mbr Brallier Fm Cambridge- on the Cincinnati Arch. Falls Fm Sonyea Fm Sonyea Fm Fm Sonyea Fm Brallier Fm Sonyea Gp Conasauga FormaƟon Sequestration Squaw Bay Ls Genesee Fm Genesee Fm Harrell Fm Genesee Fm Harrell Fm Harrell Sh Genesee Gp Burning Lower Tully Tully Ls Tully Fm Gilboa Skunne- target Olentangy Tully Ls Fm munk Cgl Springs Fault Warrior FormaƟon Precambrian Mahan- Mahan- Undivided Traverse Ls Traverse kill Fm North Hamilton Mahan- tango Fm Manor- Bellvale Eighteen wells were unconformity Fm Gp tango Millboro Gp tango Fm Hamilton Hamilton Ss Vernon Sh undivided Gp -14,000 Traverse Bell Sh Ls Fm -14,000 Group Cornwall Potsdam Sandstone Delaware Ls Gp Marcellus Hamilton Gp Marcellus Dundee Ls Marcellus Fm Marcellus Fm Marcellus Sh Hamilton Ls Sh dee DEVONIAN Marcellus Sh Subgroup Sh Hamilton MIDDLE Dun- Confining Detroit Onondaga chosen along the Ohio Muscatuck Gp unit Lucas Fm Jeffer- River Onondaga Onondaga Ls Ls Gp Onondaga Ls Ls Onon- Need- Fm Kanouse Ss Amherstburg Fm son Ls Ls Onondaga Fm Schoharie Schoharie Fm Detroit River Gp daga more Fm Detroit Sylvania Columbus Onondaga River Gp Carlisle Bois Ls Chert Sh Ss Needmore Center Fm Esopus ? ? Blanc Fm Bois Blanc Bois Blanc Hunters- Need- Bois Blanc Esopus Fm Fm River, in a southwest- ? Huntersville Fm Fm ville more Sh Esopus Sh Chert Sh WŝƩsburgh- Oriskany Ss Connelly Cgl Oriskany Oriskany Oriskany Gp -15,000 Organic Oriskany Ss Ss Oriskany Ss Washington -15,000 LOWER Oriskany Ss Oriskany Ss Ss shale Helderberg Mandata Sh Helderberg Lineament northeast trend, to link Helderberg Gp Helderberg Gp Gp Gp Mbr Helderberg Gp Helderberg Ls Helderberg Ls Bass Bass Clifton Bass Keyser Akron Dol Rondout Fm Rondout Fm Bass Island Gp Islands Gp Islands Forge Ss Islands Dol Keyser Ls PALEOZOIC Keyser Fm Bertie Fm Decker Berkshire the Kentucky site to Fm Fm Valley Fm Camillus Coal-bearing Bossards- Salina Dol Tonoloway Tonoloway Fm ville Ls rocks Bailey Ls Tonoloway Fm Salina Gp Fm Salina Gp Salina Ls Salina Syracuse Poxono Poxono Wabash Fm Island Fm Island Fm the AEP Mountaineer -16,000 Fm Fm Gp Wills Gp Salina Vernon Salina Gp Wills Salina Gp Salina Mocc. Springs Creek Creek Wills Creek Fm Fm Ludlow-Pridoli Louis- Blooms- ville Fm Longwood Pleasant Ls Fm burg Basal Mills Newburg Ss Bloomsburg Williamsport Red Beds Sh site in West Virginia, Niagara Gp Wald- Bainbridge Gp Fm Ss Fm Bloomsburg Lockport Dol ron Lockport Dol Lockport Dol Lockport McKenzie Fm confining Sh Lockport McKenzie Fm Salamonie Dol Dol Fm Fm Mifflintown Fm units SILURIAN Rochester Rochester Manistique Gp Clinton Rochester Sh Keefer Ss Sh Keefer Ss Keefer Ss to the First Energy St.
Recommended publications
  • Fractured Shale Gas Potential in New York
    FRACTURED SHALE GAS POTENTIAL IN NEW YORK David G. HILL and Tracy E. LOMBARDI TICORA Geosciences, Inc., Arvada, Colorado, USA John P. MARTIN New York State Energy Research and Development Authority, Albany, New York, USA ABSTRACT In 1821, a shallow well drilled in the Devonian age shale ushered in a new era for the United States when natural gas was produced, transported and sold to local establishments in the town of Fredonia, New York. Following this discovery, hundreds of shallow shale wells were drilled along the Lake Erie shoreline and eventually several shale gas fields were established southeastward from the lake in the late 1800’s. Since the mid 1900’s, approximately 100 wells have been drilled in New York to test the fractured shale potential of the Devonian and Silurian age shales. With so few wells drilled over the past century, the true potential of fractured shale reservoirs has not been thoroughly assessed, and there may be a substantial resource. While the resource for shale gas in New York is large, ranging from 163-313 trillion cubic feet (Tcf) and the history of production dates back over 180 years, it has not been a major contributor to natural gas production in New York. A review of the history and research conducted on the shales shows that the resource in New York is poorly understood and has not been adequately tested. Other shales such as the Silurian and Ordovician Utica Shale may also hold promise as new commercial shale gas reservoirs. Experience developing shale gas plays in the past 20 years has demonstrated that every shale play is unique.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambrian Ordovician
    Open File Report LXXVI the shale is also variously colored. Glauconite is generally abundant in the formation. The Eau Claire A Summary of the Stratigraphy of the increases in thickness southward in the Southern Peninsula of Michigan where it becomes much more Southern Peninsula of Michigan * dolomitic. by: The Dresbach sandstone is a fine to medium grained E. J. Baltrusaites, C. K. Clark, G. V. Cohee, R. P. Grant sandstone with well rounded and angular quartz grains. W. A. Kelly, K. K. Landes, G. D. Lindberg and R. B. Thin beds of argillaceous dolomite may occur locally in Newcombe of the Michigan Geological Society * the sandstone. It is about 100 feet thick in the Southern Peninsula of Michigan but is absent in Northern Indiana. The Franconia sandstone is a fine to medium grained Cambrian glauconitic and dolomitic sandstone. It is from 10 to 20 Cambrian rocks in the Southern Peninsula of Michigan feet thick where present in the Southern Peninsula. consist of sandstone, dolomite, and some shale. These * See last page rocks, Lake Superior sandstone, which are of Upper Cambrian age overlie pre-Cambrian rocks and are The Trempealeau is predominantly a buff to light brown divided into the Jacobsville sandstone overlain by the dolomite with a minor amount of sandy, glauconitic Munising. The Munising sandstone at the north is dolomite and dolomitic shale in the basal part. Zones of divided southward into the following formations in sandy dolomite are in the Trempealeau in addition to the ascending order: Mount Simon, Eau Claire, Dresbach basal part. A small amount of chert may be found in and Franconia sandstones overlain by the Trampealeau various places in the formation.
    [Show full text]
  • Columnals (PDF)
    2248 22482 2 4 V. INDEX OF COLUMNALS 8 Remarks: In this section the stratigraphic range given under the genus is the compiled range of all named species based solely on columnals assigned to the genus. It should be noted that this range may and often differs considerably from the range given under the same genus in Section I, because that range is based on species identified on cups or crowns. All other abbreviations and format follow that of Section I. Generic names followed by the type species are based on columnals. Genera, not followed by the type species, are based on cups and crowns as given in Section I. There are a number of unlisted columnal taxa from the literature that are indexed as genera recognized on cups and crowns. Bassler and Moodey (1943) did not index columnal taxa that were not new names or identified genera with the species unnamed. I have included some of the omissions of Bassler and Moodey, but have not made a search of the extensive literature specifically for the omitted citations because of time constraints. Many of these unlisted taxa are illustrated in the early state surveys of the eastern and central United States. Many of the columnal species assigned to genera based on cups or crowns are incorrect assignments. An uncertain, but significant, number of the columnal genera are synonyms of other columnal genera as they are based on different parts of the stem of a single taxon. Also a number of the columnal genera are synonyms of genera based on cups and crowns as they come from more distal parts of the stem not currently known to be associated with the cup or crown.
    [Show full text]
  • Tremichnus in Crinoid Pluricolumnals from the Silurian of Western Estonia (Baltica)
    Carnets Geol. 15 (17) Tremichnus in crinoid pluricolumnals from the Silurian of western Estonia (Baltica) Olev VINN 1 Mark A. WILSON 2 William I. AUSICH 3 Ursula TOOM 4 Abstract: Rare pits attributed to Tremichnus have been found in crinoids from the Silurian of Estonia. The Rhuddanian Tremichnus is the earliest symbiont in crinoid columnals of Baltica. These pits presu- mably were domiciles of unknown organisms. Tremichnus had a negative effect on the host crinoid as demonstrated by swollen columnals. Tremichnus in the Silurian of Estonia is less common than similar traces in the Silurian of nearby Gotland. The most important aspect of this study is the rarity of this interaction in these samples in contrast to most other samples of comparable age elsewhere. These structures have a very patchy distribution. Key Words: Trace fossils; Tremichnus; symbiosis; crinoids; Silurian; Estonia. Citation: VINN O., WILSON M.A., AUSICH W.I. & TOOM U. (2015).- Tremichnus in crinoid pluricolumnals from the Silurian of western Estonia (Baltica).- Carnets Geol., Madrid, vol. 15, nº 17, p. 239-243. Résumé : Tremichnus dans des segments de tiges de crinoïdes du Silurien d'Estonie occiden- tale (bouclier balte).- Quelques petites cavités attribuées à Tremichnus ont été trouvées dans des crinoïdes provenant du Silurien d'Estonie. Ce Tremichnus rhuddanien est le symbiote le plus ancien ob- servé dans des segments de tiges de crinoïdes du bouclier balte. Ces cavités correspondent vraisem- blablement à des habitats d'organismes inconnus. Tremichnus a eu un impact négatif sur le crinoïde hôte comme en attestent les renflements des tiges. Tremichnus est moins fréquent dans le Silurien d'Estonie que des traces semblables dans le Silurien du Gotland voisin.
    [Show full text]
  • GEOLOGIC SUMMARY of the APPALACHIAN BASIN, with REFERENCE to the SUBSURFACE DISPOSAL of RADIOACTIVE WASTE SOLUTIONS by George W
    TEI-791 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY" GEOLOGIC SUMMARY OF THE APPALACHIAN BASIN, WITH;REFERENCE TO THE SUBSURFACE DISPOSAL OF RADIOACTIVE WASTE SOLUTIONS* By George W. Colton June 1961 Report TEI-791 This report is preliminary and ha^;not been edited for conformity with G^logical Survey format and nomenclature. ?1 ^Prepared on behalf of the U. S. Atomic Energy Commission. CONTENTS Abstract* .......................... 5 Introduction. ........................ 7 Purpose of report. ................... 7 Organization of report .................. 7 Location and extent of area. .............. Q Acknowledgments. .................... 10 Geologic framework. ..................... 10 Depositional framework ................. 10 Structural framework .................. llj. Stratigraphy. ........................ 17 Late Precambrian stratified sequence .......... 17 Early Cambrian clastic sequence. ............ 18 Thickness and depth ................ 22 Cambrian-Ordovician carbonate sequence ......... 23 Thickness and depth . , ........... 35 Late Ordovician clastic sequence ............ 35 Thickness and depth ................ Mi- Early Silurian clastic sequence. ............ kk Thickness and depth ................ 51 Silurian-Devonian carbonate sequence .......... 52 Thickness and depth ................ 62 Devonian classic sequence. ............... 63 Thickness and depth ................ 69 Mississippian sequence ................. 70 Thickness and depth ................ 79 Pennsylvanian sequence ................. 79 Waste
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibit 5 Town of Barton Geology and Seismicity Report Sections
    GEOLOGY AND SEISMICITY REPORT SNYDER E1-A WELL TOWN OF BARTON TIOGA COUNTY, NEW YORK Prepared for: Couch White, LLP 540 Broadway P.O. Box 22222 Albany, New York 12201 Prepared by: Continental Placer Inc. II Winners Circle Albany, New York 12205 July 25, 2017 Table of Contents 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................................. 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Depositional Sequences and General Stratigraphic Sequence ................................................ 2 2.1.1 Upper Devonian Lithologies ........................................................................................................ 4 2.1.2 Marcellus-Hamilton ..................................................................................................................... 4 2.1.3 Tristates-Onondaga ...................................................................................................................... 4 2.1.4 Helderberg .................................................................................................................................... 4 2.1.5 Oneida-Clinton-Salina ................................................................................................................. 4 2.1.6 Black River-Trenton-Utica-Frankfort .......................................................................................... 5 2.1.7 Potsdam-Beekmantown ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • X Hydrogeologic Framework and Geochemistry of Ground Water
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR PREPARED IN COOPERATION WITH THE WATER-RESOURCES INVESTIGATIONS REPORT 02-4123 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, SOUTHERN DIVISION, SHEET 1 of 3 NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND Taylor. C.J., and Hostettler, F.D., 2002, Hydrogeologic Framework and Geochemistry of Ground Water and Petroleum in the Silurian-Devonian Carbonate Aquifer, South-Central Louisville, Kentucky science USGSfor a changing world INTRODUCTION (A) (B) (C) (D) Previously published investigations concerning the ground-water resources HOLE DIAMETER, ACOUSTIC HOLE DIAMETER. ACOUSTIC HOLE DIAMETER. ACOUSTIC HOLE DIAMETER, ACOUSTIC of the city of Louisville and Jefferson County, Kentucky, have mostly focused on IN INCHES LITHOLOGY TELEVIEWER IN INCHES LITHOLOGY TELEVIEWER IN INCHES LITHOLOGY TELEVIEWER IN INCHES LITHOLOGY TELEVIEWER the highly productive Ohio River alluvial aquifer (Rorabaugh, 1956; Walker, 1957; Bell. 1966: Unthank and others, 1995). In contrast, relatively little attention has been given to the Ordovician and Silurian-Devonian carbonate aquifers that 10h X 10.4 underlie much of the Louisville and Jefferson County area (fig. I) because of their limited potential for water-supply development (Palmquist and Hall, 1960). LLJ LU O O However, detailed information about the ground-water quality and hydrogeology of £ the carbonate aquifer is needed by State and Federal environmental regulators and o: a: ^ ID private consultants for planning and conducting local environmental t,ite 5% CO C/3 t. * assessments and ground-water remediation. The Silurian-Devonian carbonate Q Q aquifer is of particular interest because it underlies much of the urbanized and 40;: 72%- industrialized areas of the city of Louisville, exhibits moderately well-developed NF karst, and is potentially vulnerable to human-induced contamination.
    [Show full text]
  • Le Silurien Du Synclinorium De Moncorvo (Ne Du Portugal): Biostratigraphie Et Importance Paléogéographique
    LE SILURIEN DU SYNCLINORIUM DE MONCORVO (NE DU PORTUGAL): BIOSTRATIGRAPHIE ET IMPORTANCE PALÉOGÉOGRAPHIQUE GRACIELA NOEMI SARMIENTO, JOSÉ MANDEL PIÇARRA, JOSÉ ALMEIDA REBELO, MICHEL ROBARDET, JUAN CARLOS GUTIÉRREZ-MARCO, PETR STORCH & ISABEL RABANO SARMIENTO G.N., PIÇARRA, REBELO J.A., ROBARDET M., GUTIÉRREZ-MARCO J.C., STORCH P. & RABANO I. 1999. Le Silurien du synclinorium de Moncorvo (NE du Portugal): biostratigraphie et importance paléogéogra- phique. [The Silurian of the Moncorvo synclinorium (NE Portugal): biostratigraphy and paleogeographical impor- tance]. GEOBIOS, 32, 5: 749-767. Villeurbanne, le 31.10.1999. RÉSUMÉ - Dans la succession silurienne du synclinorium de Moncorvo (NW de la Zone Centre Ibérique, Portugal), des lentilles calcaires ont livré, dans deux localités distinctes, les premiers conodontes siluriens du Portugal. Dans la première localité, Kockelella cf. uariabilis, K. cf. absidata, Ozarkodina confluens, Oz. excauata et Pseudooneotod us beckmanni indiquent le Ludlow s.l. (ou peut-être le Wenlock supérieur ou terminal). Dans la seconde, Oulod us ele- gans, O. cf. cristagalli et Ozarkodina ex gr. remscheidensis indiquent le Pridoli, ce que confirme la présence, dans le même gisement, de scyphocrinoïdes du genre Scyphocrinites, et en particulier les lobolithes à cirrhes. Dans les schistes noirs à nodules sous-jacents aux calcaires, des graptolites montrent l'existence de niveaux du Llandovery moyen et supérieur (Aéronien et Télychien) et du Wenlock. La succession silurienne de Moncorvo apparaît ainsi comme une séquence condensée, analogue, en particulier, à celles qui existent dans la Zone d'Ossa Morena, en Sardaigne et dans certaines régions d'Afrique du Nord. Ces successions sont bien différentes de celles qui caracté- risent les régions centrales et méridionales de la Zone Centre Ibérique où, dans leur partie supérieure, les dépôts siluriens, de faible profondeur, sont beaucoup plus épais et plus riches en matériel terrigène grossier.
    [Show full text]
  • Figure 3A. Major Geologic Formations in West Virginia. Allegheney And
    82° 81° 80° 79° 78° EXPLANATION West Virginia county boundaries A West Virginia Geology by map unit Quaternary Modern Reservoirs Qal Alluvium Permian or Pennsylvanian Period LTP d Dunkard Group LTP c Conemaugh Group LTP m Monongahela Group 0 25 50 MILES LTP a Allegheny Formation PENNSYLVANIA LTP pv Pottsville Group 0 25 50 KILOMETERS LTP k Kanawha Formation 40° LTP nr New River Formation LTP p Pocahontas Formation Mississippian Period Mmc Mauch Chunk Group Mbp Bluestone and Princeton Formations Ce Obrr Omc Mh Hinton Formation Obps Dmn Bluefield Formation Dbh Otbr Mbf MARYLAND LTP pv Osp Mg Greenbrier Group Smc Axis of Obs Mmp Maccrady and Pocono, undivided Burning Springs LTP a Mmc St Ce Mmcc Maccrady Formation anticline LTP d Om Dh Cwy Mp Pocono Group Qal Dhs Ch Devonian Period Mp Dohl LTP c Dmu Middle and Upper Devonian, undivided Obps Cw Dhs Hampshire Formation LTP m Dmn OHIO Ct Dch Chemung Group Omc Obs Dch Dbh Dbh Brailler and Harrell, undivided Stw Cwy LTP pv Ca Db Brallier Formation Obrr Cc 39° CPCc Dh Harrell Shale St Dmb Millboro Shale Mmc Dhs Dmt Mahantango Formation Do LTP d Ojo Dm Marcellus Formation Dmn Onondaga Group Om Lower Devonian, undivided LTP k Dhl Dohl Do Oriskany Sandstone Dmt Ot Dhl Helderberg Group LTP m VIRGINIA Qal Obr Silurian Period Dch Smc Om Stw Tonoloway, Wills Creek, and Williamsport Formations LTP c Dmb Sct Lower Silurian, undivided LTP a Smc McKenzie Formation and Clinton Group Dhl Stw Ojo Mbf Db St Tuscarora Sandstone Ordovician Period Ojo Juniata and Oswego Formations Dohl Mg Om Martinsburg Formation LTP nr Otbr Ordovician--Trenton and Black River, undivided 38° Mmcc Ot Trenton Group LTP k WEST VIRGINIA Obr Black River Group Omc Ordovician, middle calcareous units Mp Db Osp St.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology for Environmental Planning . in Marion County
    GEOLOGY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING . GEOLOGY--:~ .\RY IN MARION COUNTY, INDIANA SURVEY Special Report 19 c . 3 State of)pdiana Department of N'.atural Resources GEOLOGICAL SURVEY SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL STAFF OF THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY JOHN B. PATION, State Geologist MAURICE E. BIGGS, Assistant State Geologist MARY BETH FOX, Mineral Statistician COAL AND INDUSTRIAL MINERALS SECTION GEOLOGY SECTION DONALD D. CARR, Geologist and Head ROBERT H. SHAVER, Paleontologist and Head CURTIS H. AULT, Geologist and Associate Head HENRY H. GRAY, Head Stratigrapher PEl-YUAN CHEN, Geologist N. K. BLEUER, Glacial Geologist DONALD L. EGGERT, Geologist EDWIN J. HARTKE, Environmental Geologist GORDON S. FRASER, Geologist JOHN R. HILL, Glacial Geologist DENVER HARPER, Geologist CARL B. REXROAD, Paleontologist WALTER A. HASENMUELLER, Geologist NELSON R. SHAFFER, Geologist GEOPHYSICS SECTION PAUL IRWIN, Geological Assistant MAURICE E. BIGGS, Geophysicist and Head ROBERT F. BLAKELY, Geophysicist JOSEPH F. WHALEY, Geophysicist DRAFTINGANDPHOTOGRAPHYSECTION JOHN R. HELMS, Driller WILLIAM H. MORAN, Chief Draftsman and Head SAMUEL L. RIDDLE, Geophysical Assistant RICHARDT. HILL, Geological Draftsman ROGER L. PURCELL, Senior Geological Draftsman PETROLEUM SECTION GEORGE R. RINGER, Photographer G. L. CARPENTER, Geologist and Head WILBUR E. STALIONS, Artist-Draftsman ANDREW J. HREHA, Geologist BRIAN D. KEITH, Geologist EDUCATIONAL SERVICES SECTION STANLEY J. KELLER, Geologist R. DEE RARICK, Geologist and Head DAN M. SULLIVAN, Geologist JAMES T. CAZEE, Geological Assistant
    [Show full text]
  • Biostratigraphy and Paleoecology of the Upper Devonian Ithaca Formation Near Cortland, New York
    Biostratigraphy and Paleoecology of the Upper Devonian Ithaca Formation near Cortland, New York by Jonathan W. Harrington Geological Consultant Groton, New York and W. Graham Heaslip State University College at Cortland Cortland, New York It i s particularly appropriate that we examine the Ithaca Formation in the Cortland area during the Golden Anniversary Meeting of the New York State Geological Association. The rocks of this region are of con­ siderable historical interest, having received attention since the earli­ est days of geolog ical investigation in New York State . In fact, the presence of fossil shells in the Devonian rocks of New York was first noted in 1751 at a hillside outcrop in Cortland County by John Bartram, a member of the Lewis Evans Onondaga expedition (We lls, 1963). The New York Devonian is unique in its completeness, fossil content. numerous outcrops, and relatively undisturbed nature. It is the standard reference section for North America and displays a classic example of facies transition. Stratigraphic and paleontologic investigation over the past century has produced a wealth of infonnation, but uDespite this, perhaps another century of rigorous study wi ll be required before a thor­ ough understanding of its paleontology, lithology, stratigraphy and paleoecology can be attained. n (Rickard. 1964). The early stratigraphic work in the Upper Devonian of New York was done mainly by James Hall. J. M. Clarke. and H. S. Williams between 1840 and 1915 . These workers subdivided the succession, described the faunas and attempted to correlate along the strike. Due to comp l ex interfinger­ ing of the argillaceous western sequence with the thicker arenaceous eastern sequence, correlations proved difficult.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Hydrogeologic Evaluation of the Cincinnati Arch Region For
    PRELIMINARY HYDROGEOLOGIC EVALUATION OF THE CINCINNATI ARCH REGION FOR UNDERGROUND HIGH-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE DISPOSAL, INDIANA, KENTUCKY, AND OHIO By Orville B. Lloyd, Jr., and Robert W. Davis U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 88-4098 Raleigh, North Carolina 1989 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL HODEL, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information, Copies of this report can contact: be purchased from: Chief, Branch of Nuclear Waste Hydrology Books and Open-File Reports U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey National Center, Mail Stop 410 Federal Center, Building 810 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive Box 25425 Reston, Virginia 22092 Denver, Colorado 80225 or District Chief U.S. Geological Survey Post Office Box 2857 Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 Telephone: (919) 856-4510 CONTENTS Page Abstract. ............................... 1 Introduction. ............................. 2 Background ............................ 2 Purpose and scope. ........................ 4 Previous investigations. ..................... 4 Acknowledgments.......................... 6 Methods of investigation. ....................... 6 Hydrogeology of the sedimentary rocks ................. 8 General geology. ......................... 8 Hydrogeologic framework. ..................... 14 Basal sandstone aquifer ................... 14 Potential confining unit. .................. 17 Distribution and source of freshwater, saline water, and brine. ........................... 19 Ground-water occurrence and
    [Show full text]